Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 1

Results from our survey score at 1.

8 was the method of having people


come to the altar rail in groups, kneeling,
on worship matters at receiving communion, and then being
dismissed from the altar rail. It also seemed
SHUMC very few had any interest in anything along
the lines of weekly communion with scores of
Through Friday, June 12, we’ve received 1.3 and 1.6.
27 responses, some on paper and some
digitally. What follows is a summary of this 7) People who responded about their
“non-scientific” survey: PREFERED STYLE of worship, greatly
preferred a “blended worship that reaches
1) When asked what people liked BEST multiple generations” at 64%; adding the
about SHUMC worship, 35% said “preaching” responses of those who expressed a
and 27% chose “contemporary music.” The preference for the “casual style that caters to
lowest items receiving responses were the families with kids” (8%) resulted in a
use of the Apostles Creed and Psalter combined score of 72%. Combining
readings. traditional worship (16%) with formality
2) What people who responded liked (8%) reached a 24% preference score.
LEAST was praise music at 43%. Following 8) People were then asked to choose
that top response of “least liked” about our the one BEST method of doing ministry that
worship were the greeting time at 14%, reaches our neighbors, and 27% selected
announcements at 10%, and traditional culture-friendly worship services. Combining
worship elements also at 10%. mission projects and community events
3) People said that organ/piano music together produced a score of 35%. Also many
was MISSED the most at 28% in our current people (23%) responded wanting to select
blended worship style, followed closely by more than just one way of focusing our
music specials at 24%. ministry to reach our neighbors and the
frequent comments were that we have done
4) People who responded were asked that in the past.
to rank on a 1–4 scale (4 being the highest
ranking) the various parts of our CURRENT 9) When asked what we as a church
blended worship. The highest marks were should concentrate our efforts on in
preaching with a 3.5 score and Bible reading STRENGTHENING our church, the biggest
at 3.3. Those worship parts receiving the response people chose was “whatever gets
lowest rankings were the greeting time at 2.4, more people back to church and money in the
the opening praise music at 2.4 and singing offering plates” by 26%. An emphasis on
the closing song after the benediction at 2.3. using (a) Sunday School and Bible Study, (b)
children and youth ministry, or (c) small
5) Two items dominated the list of groups were all near the bottom at 9% each.
worship pieces most DESIRED. They were (Although one might also combine those
drama at 65% and artistic displays at 53% categories into “group ministries” and come
(Clearly, a much more active “Worship Arts” up with a combined scored of 27%.)
team is desired by our congregation.)
10) People responding said YES at a
6) Our question on HOLY COMMUNION 82% rate that a new effort of following up
received quite the variety of responses. Again with people who miss worship is important.
ranking on the 1–4 point scale, the highest
NOTE: I used the free software to conduct this survey
response were people preferring the manner which has built-in limitations including the inability of
of receiving communion by the congregation electronically sharing the actual results. A
moving around the sanctuary in a free- subscription, which expands the survey options, is
flowing line with a 2.9 score. The lowest $19.95 a month. –Pastor Glenn

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi