Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Like most websites, Supply Management uses cookies to improve your experience of our site. Close this window to agree to our use of cookies. Or find out more
8/30/13
operations. So here we talk to analysts and former employees to find out how Apple does it, and how it has overcome obstacles. Supply chain excellence Apple, according to AMR, demonstrates an intoxicating mix of brilliant industrial design, transcendent software interfaces and consumable goods that are purely digital. The mechanical and financial benefits of this approach include extremely high inventory turns, minimal material or capacity limitations to growth, and excellent margins. Intoxicating and transcendent not words you see in most research reports. But it wasnt always that way. Even AMR notes that historically, Apple had a poor reputation for supply chain performance but the arrival of the iPhone in 2007 changed all that. With the introduction of the iPhone, Apple could have stumbled at meeting demand or failed on quality. It did neither. Behind-the-scenes moves such as tying up essential components well in advance and upgrading basic information systems have enabled Apple to handle the demands of its rabid fan base without having to fall back on their forgiveness for mistakes. A number of analysts make the point that Apples supply chain is in key respects different from those of most companies, in that it comprises physical and digital components in a way unseen before, with the companys revenue and growth coming increasingly from the digital side. The changing nature of this two-sided supply system has led some to suggest that Apples supply chain is a new type of beast entirely. Thats not without its problems. When Apple rolled out the 3G version of the iPhone in 2008, there was no shortage of the new handsets themselves in the companys outlets. A sure sign the physical supply chain processes of manufacturing, inventory and logistics were working well. The digital side, however, proved more difficult, and the company initially struggled under the snowstorm of activation demands through the iTunes store triggered by the new phones. That, says Kevin OMarah, chief strategist at AMR, highlighted the problems of a company straddling these two very different kinds of supply chain. The pioneering position they have taken in the digital supply chain is showing how tough it is to compete in this new realm, he says. Apples difficulties with that launch also highlight the strains placed on the supply chain by the companys marketing approach of building demand while restraining supply, and then releasing the goods in one big blazing launch. For years, industry pundits have lavished praise on Apple as an industry supply-chain leader that takes advantage of design and manufacturing expertise on a truly global basis, says supply chain commentator Jason Busch, founder and MD of Azul Partners, and blogger on Spend Matters. When it comes to such an innovative product, the possibility of potential issues rises exponentially early on in large-scale production runs, especially as suppliers at all levels begin to coordinate activities more closely. The challenge lies when product innovation outpaces the ability of suppliers to ramp up quickly enough in the early stages of a new-product supply chain. The companys ability to bring together two sides of the supply chain (digital and physical) efficiently and at increasingly low cost is a central plank to Apples rise to global dominance. So how has it overcome difficulties to be recognised as the best? Perfecting outsourcing Perhaps the key innovation Apple has made on its procurement side is that it has almost entirely outsourced its supply chain. Nigel Johnson, who worked at Apple for seven years before helping to found consulting firm Reclipse, believes outsourcing is the key to Apples supply-side success. Its probably one of the best supply chain models in the world, he says. It has done a very good job of perfecting outsourcing, of simplifying it and the way that its managed. It qualifies a supplier and builds with them globally, so
www.supplymanagement.com/analysis/case-studies/2010/right-to-the-core/ 2/5
8/30/13
somebody else does all the physical work and then it goes direct to the customer. But, whoever does it, the masterplan is always Apples. Using iPhoto [to order prints] is a good example. You press a button on a Mac or an iPhone or an iPad, and it goes off to an outsourcer somewhere, and Apple doesnt touch it, and then it goes to a customer that Apple hasnt touched. That means its pretty good at understanding the whole end-to-end chain, and I dont think that kind of understanding has been developed yet among many companies. It also gives it a lot of sway over its supply chain. Dave Howell, another former Apple insider and now CEO of software developer Avatron, working largely on creating apps for Apple, believes this ability to outsource everything from innovation to risk is at the heart of the companys success. Apple has mastered the art of identifying negative metrics and moving them off its books, he says. It optimises its physical supply chain by requiring suppliers to carry adequate inventory and taking the associated pipelines off its own books. It does the same thing with software development for iPhone and iPad, where thirdparty developers take all the financial risk of developing apps. Apple still has a 30 per cent margin on iPhone apps, but has near-zero development cost. Also, in the iPad world at least, Apple owns its entire vertical pipeline, including chip design, industrial design, box assembly, operating system, applications, hardware distribution, software distribution, and soon advertising. In the Windows world these parts would be split up between companies such as Intel, Dell, Microsoft, Adobe, PC distributors, internet software sites and AdMob. Theres no way such a disparate system could ever be optimised for anything. Apples trick is that it not only owns all of those inputs, but controls them tyrannically and makes external companies carry the inventory. Tyrannical it may be, but Howell believes this supply model opens opportunities to suppliers, at least on the software development side, that they would never have in a more traditional arrangement, while also creating an innovation machine for Apple. They create an opportunity thats real, and they allow some people to succeed beyond their dreams, he says. Theyve created a mechanism for people to write apps without any marketing team, without even management or project management, to create apps with only engineering and graphic design. Now its possible, probably for the first time, to do it on your own in your bedroom. So theyve got all these people taking the kind of chance that a start-up takes, that its hard for Apple to take any more. If you come up with an idea within Apple you have to run it through chains of management and veils of secrecy that manage to shut down most innovative thinking at an individual level. And now they have that working for them, without them having to even invest in it. Its beautiful. Leading figures The face of Apples success is unquestionably that of Steve Jobs, master marketer and co-founder. He left and then returned Messiah-like in troubled times to guide the company to glory, and emerges from time to time, dressed in enigmatic black, to amaze halls full of starry-eyed journalists with the latest piece of sleek whizzbangery. But behind the success of the companys mysterious outsourced supply chain is another, far less public figure. Tim Cook appeared as if from nowhere at the helm of Apple last year when Jobs took time off for medical treatment, an event that triggered a small seizure among Apple shareholders. Cook soon restored investors nerves, improving the COOs position as a prospective heir to the top job when Jobs finally goes. But, according to Apple-watchers, far more important than Cooks role in stepping into Jobss shoes has been his
www.supplymanagement.com/analysis/case-studies/2010/right-to-the-core/ 3/5
8/30/13
work on the supply chain. He turned a company that was on the brink of bankruptcy into one that is generating a huge amount of free cash, says Charlie Wolf, an analyst at investment banking group Needham & Co. Having earned his spurs as a procurement professional, Cook was hired from Compaq in 1998 to deal with the problems in Apples supply chain, at the time heavy with inventory and contributing to an annual loss of more than $1 billion. Cooks solution was to close down factories and warehouses and initiate the outsourcing process that has created the supply organisation that now earns so much praise. Describing inventory as fundamentally evil, Cook set about instilling a logistical discipline that has given Apple a market-leading inventory management system, territory formerly dominated by Dell. He also used Apples healthy balance sheet to lock in suppliers. When Apple introduced the iPod Nano in 2005, it pre-paid suppliers of flash memory such as Samsung and Hynix and effectively cornered the market for flash memory for years, leaving competitors empty-handed. Cooks success in reshaping Apples supply chain makes him a prime example of how procurement can be the ideal preparation for a position on the top floor. While Cooks outsourced supply chain may work well for app developers in their bedrooms, for bigger entities, and those on the physical rather than the digital side, supplying to Apple undoubtedly brings a particular set of problems. Sworn to secrecy Confidentiality is a key one. Secrecy all along the supply chain is an integral part of making Apples tightly controlled marketing approach successful, understandable in an industry that is so heavily dependent on intellectual property (IP), and in which competitors take the first opportunity to rip apart each others products to study them and begin turning out something similar. For suppliers, however, the required degree of secrecy can create unusual pressures. Apple has been criticised by some suppliers anonymously, of course for bringing them in at the absolute last minute, which can create all kinds of problems, and for insisting on the most rigorous security and confidentiality measures theyve ever experienced. But it must be a price worth paying, anonymous complainers included, to be part of the Apple supply empire. The pressure apparently felt by suppliers in the Far East to ensure none of Apples secrets find their way to competitors have been highlighted recently, with allegations of particularly tough treatment of employees in at least one facility. However, when it comes to monitoring ethical issues among its suppliers, many analysts believe Apple is leading the way in the industry. The company has a detailed supplier code of conduct and regularly conducts audits of suppliers facilities to check that the code is not being breached, auditing 102 factories last year. The effectiveness of audits has been questioned by some but they appear to go further than most of the industry. Supply chain commentator Bob Ferrari, MD of the Ferrari Group, a supply chain consulting firm, argues secrecy is a crucial element of its success and so should be respected by any supplier that wants to play a part in Apples runaway success. Apple has always had a culture of secrecy, more specifically protecting its intellectual and product capital. It is a company driven by product innovation, which has worked very well in terms of explosive business growth in sales and profitability. Apple goes to extraordinary lengths to protect its IP. If thats difficult for suppliers, the argument runs, then they should look for business elsewhere. It is no wonder that Apple remains secretive in telling the world about its supply chain business process and IT
www.supplymanagement.com/analysis/case-studies/2010/right-to-the-core/ 4/5
8/30/13
capabilities, says Ferrari. The results speak for themselves. * Richard Brass is a freelance journalist
Comments
Please enter your comments below Fill out the all the boxes and click the 'Submit comments' button to make a comment on this page First Name Last Name Email Address Job title Comments
*Comments are added to the bottom of the page. They are moderated and will not be published until approved by the Supply Management team. They may be edited. Please note unless marked confidential your feedback may be published on our letters page
Submit Clear Cancel
Supply Management is published by Redactive Media Group on behalf of the Chartered Institute of Purchasing & Supply. 2013. All Rights Reserved. Although this site has been built to work in most browsers, we recommend using Internet Explorer version 7+, Firefox version 3 (PC) or Safari (Mac). The optimum screen resolution is 1280 x 1024 pixels, followed by 1024 x 768.
www.supplymanagement.com/analysis/case-studies/2010/right-to-the-core/
5/5