Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 36

Lecture 7

Variation, competition, and


the effects of selection

March 31, 2000


Lecture 6,
revisited
Natural selection
works by cumulative progress

Evolution by natural selection does


not depend on impossible events.

Natural selection is an extremely efficient


search process

Genetic Algorithms: computer


procedures based on variation and
selection, can solve hard problems
The eye, revisited

Can use fossils to trace eye’s


history:
about 400-500 MY

Did not have to happen all at


once
The evolution of complexity:

Natural selection can account for


complex adaptations

Natural selection is the only known


process that can do so.
Complex solution spaces:
fractals
Complex solution spaces:
fractals
Lecture 7

The Beginning
What is evolution?

Purves et al:
change in genotypes in population

The Truth:
change in inherited traits within
a population, including genotype and
phenotype
Population:

Any group of organisms capable of


interbreeding, and coexisting at the
same time and in the same place.
Conditions for Natural
Selection

Competition

Inherited variation
Mutation is the source of
variation
The environment causes
variation in many traits

Phenotypic variation depends on


the relative contributions of genes
and environment

Temperature, nutrition, etc.


Variation can be measured:

Phenotype

Protein electrophoresis

Nucleic acid sequencing


Measure wingspan --
How much variation is found
in natural populations?

Lewontin and Hubby (1966)


Electrophoresis study of polymorphism in
Drosophila pseudoobscura

18 loci, five populations

Average: 30% of loci polymorphic


12% of individual genome
heterozygous
The Hardy-Weinberg
Equilibrium

In the absence of other influences, the


frequencies of genotypes in a
population have characteristic values
that depend only on allele frequencies.
The Hardy-Weinberg
Equilibrium
At equilibrium, the frequencies of
genotypes and alleles are the same in the
offspring as in the parent population.

There is no loss of alleles from one


generation to the next.

A population reaches equilibrium in a


single generation.
Fitness (w)

The average reproductive success of


one genotype, relative to that of the
genotype with highest fitness.
Selection coefficient (s):
the intensity of selection against a
genotype or phenotype

s=1-w

Fitness w 1.0 0.8 0.3


Selection coeff. s 0 0.2 0.7
Response to selection depends on:

strength of selection (s)


Show what you can do to the play-doh
shape variation present in population

how it represents a population


Play-Doh demonstration

Show what you can do to the play-doh


shape

how it represents a population


Three effects of selection
on populations:

Directional selection
Balancing (stabilizing) selection
Disruptive selection
Directional selection

Time

Individuals who died


before reproducing
Alleles with higher fitness increase
more rapidly when dominant than
recessive
Persistence of recessive lethal
allele under directional selection
Stabilizing selection
continuous trait

Time
Stabilizing selection
discrete trait

Heterozygotes Both alleles persist in


favored stable equilibrium
Stabilizing selection on
frog calls

Male tungara frogs use calls


to attract females

Calls most attractive to


females are also most likely
to attract predatory bats
Most traits originate by
directional selection but are
limited by balancing selection.
Disruptive selection
continuous trait

Time
Disruptive selection
discrete trait

Heterozygote has lowest fitness

Unlikely that both alleles will persist


A trait maintained by
disruptive selection

Mimicry
Mimics

Models

The mimics are homozygotes for a locus


with two alleles. The heterozygotes have
an intermediate color pattern and are not
Conclusions

Variation and competition are needed for


selection to occur.

Variation and the intensity of selection


determine the population response to
selection.

Natural selection can explain change or


the lack of change.
BACK TO HOME PAGE

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi