Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
= 335
(Fig. 3).
Figure 3. Amplitude distribution of acoustic emission signals emitted by faulty fusion in welding. Cycle period 12 seconds. Lsensor = 240 mm,
Iwelding = 40
Crack formation process in welding is characterized by
dramatic increase in acoustic emission pulse number on
channels 70-80 of amplitude analyzer. It proves that the
energy of crack generation, development and formation is
very high in comparison with the energy of metal fusion and
crystallization in welding. Maximum pulse number N
E
=606
falls on 73 channels, their amplitude being 356.24 mV.
Faulty fusion is proved by metallographic research. Fig.
4 shows a screen photo of metal
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 71 73 75 77 79 81
N
microstructure with faulty fusion in weld root taken from
Austrian REICHERT microscope. Fig. 5 shows the same
from scanning electronic microscope -200.
Figure 4. Microstructure of metal with faulty fusion in weld root: steel
08181050; REICHERT microscope
Basing on experimental data of recording faulty fusion
by acoustic emission method and on simulation of faulty
fusion generation, formation and development in welding
austenitic steel a method of detecting faulty fusion has been
for the first time developed. The method consists in
receiving signals of acoustic emission arising in joint weld,
choosing the information bearing parameter which will
show the quality of a joint weld. Upon that amplitude
distribution of acoustic emission signals generated in atom
oscillation in a faulty fusion opening is chosen as the
information bearing parameter.
Besides one of the welded parts is fixed in an a tool so
that it can move vertically, and the other part is fixed rigidly,
at this signals of faulty fusion and crack formation recorded
in the same amplitude analyzer channel are distinguished
according to acoustic emission pulse number.
V. CONCLUSIONS
1. It is proved that in automatic argon-arc welding of
austenitic steels and intensive cooling of the heat affected
zone (along the fusion line) short-term tensile and
compressive stresses occur in metal and are added to
stresses in the faulty fusion opening. This phenomenon
causes breaking of interatomic bonds and emission of the
elastic mechanical wave treated as acoustic emission act.
2. It is proved that acoustic emission signals are
distributed according to amplitude criteria.
3. It is determined that acoustic emission signal of
faulty fusion generation, formation and development and
crack formation are distributed according to acoustic
emission pulse number.
Figure 5. Microstructure of metal with faulty fusion in weld root:
steel 081810; 1800 in modulation mode; microscope -200
REFERENCES
[1] Troshjenko V.T., Krasovskij A.Ja., Pokrovskij V.V., Sosnovskij L.A.,
Strizhalo V.A. Deformation and Distortion Strength of Materials.
Part.2. Kiev: Naukova dumka, 1994. 704p.(in Russian)
[2] Bol'shova K.M. Magnetic method of determining fatigue limit.
Zavodskaja laboratorija, 1947, 1, pp. 58-64. .(in Russian)
[3] Lebedev G.A., Marinec T.K., Efremov A.I. Research in Cyclic Metal
Strength By Fatigue Diagram Recording Method./ Ciklicheskaja
prochnost' metallov. M.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1962, pp. 141-146. .(in
Russian)
[4] Pisarenko G.S., Krasovskij A.Ja.. Jokobori T. Experimental Research
and Analysis of Plastic Zone Kinetics. Kiev, 1980. 66p. (Prepr.
AN Ukrainy IPP). .(in Russian)
[5] Non-Destructive Testing of Metals And Products. Reference book
edited by G.S.Samojlovicha. M.: Mashinostroenie, 1976. - 456 p. .(in
Russian)
[6] Non-destructive testing. In 5 volumes.Volume 2. Acoustic Control
Methods: Practical Guide / I.N.Ermolov, N.P.Aljoshin, A.I.Potapov;
pod red. V.V.Suhorukova. M.: Vyssh. shk., 1991.-283p. .(in Russian)
[7] Belov V.M., Bolotin Ju.I. A Method of Joint Weld Quality Control
Inventors Certificate. 567128. Inventors Bulletin, 1977, 28. .(in
Russian)
[8] Apasov A.M., Apasov A.A. A Method of Detecting Faulty Fusion in
Welding. Materials of XIV Scientific Conference, Devoted to the 300
Anniversary of Engineering Education in Russia: Yurga, Branch of l
TPU, 2001. P.62. .(in Russian)
[9] Apasov A.M., Apasov A.A. A Method of Detecting Faulty Fusion in
Welding. Patent 2212030. Inventors Bulletin, 2003.25.
P.564. .(in Russian)
[10] Apasov A.M., Apasov A.A. Faulty Fusion Generation, Development
and Diagnostics in Welding, Part1 Izvestija Tomskogo
politehnicheskogo universiteta. 2005. 1. Volume 308, pp. 158-
162. .(in Russian)
[11] Apasov A.M., Apasov A.A. Faulty Fusion Generation, Development
and Diagnostics in Welding, Part2 Izvestija Tomskogo
politehnicheskogo universiteta. 2005. 2. Volume. 308, pp.
120-126. .(in Russian)
[12] Apasov A.M., Apasov A.A. Faulty Fusion Generation, Development
and Diagnostics in Welding, Part3 Izvestija Tomskogo
politehnicheskogo universiteta. 2005. 3. Volume. 308, pp.
132-135. .(in Russian)
200 m
5,5 m
[13] Danilovskaja V.I. Temperature Stresses in Elastic Semi-Space Caused
by Sudden Heating of Its Edge Applied Mathematics and
Mechanics, 1950. Volume XIV, Issue. 3, pp. 316-318. .(in
Russian)
[14] Tverskoj V.S. Calculation of acoustic emission spectrum. Non-
destructive testing, 1981, 4, pp. 6267. .(in Russian)
[15] Apasov A.M. Active destruction diagnostics and catastrophe
prevention; monograph / A.M. Apasov. Tomsk: Izd-vo
Tomskogo politehnicheskogo universiteta, 2010. 216 p. .(in
Russian)