Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
36
nvironmental pollution due to the development in technology is one of the most important problems of this century. Heavy metals like chromium, copper, lead, cadmium, etc. in wastewater are hazardous to the environment. These metals cannot be degraded or readily detoxied biologically and have tendency to accumulate in living material. Beside that, heavy metals discharge in the wastewater can be toxic to aquatic life and render natural waters unsuitable for human consumption. Chromium is priority metal pollutant introduced into water bodies from many industrial processes such as tanning, metal processing, paint manufacturing, steel fabrication and agricultural runoff. Chromium is also used in explosive, ceramics and photography. Chromium occurs in the aquatic environment as both trivalent and hexavalent states. Hexavalent chromium, which is primarily present in the form of chromate (Cr2O4-) and dichromate (Cr2O7-), possesses signicantly higher levels of toxicity than the other valency states (Sharma and Forster, 1995). The toxicity of Cr (VI) is well documented and it is considered a hazard to health of man and animals. The various compounds of chromium are found to be both corrosive to esh and carcinogenic (Ajmal et al., 1996). The presence of Cr (VI) in the aquatic environment at high concentrations is lethal to marine species. Hexavalent chromium can affect the reproduction of sh and can accumulate in the tissue of sh even if it is present at low concentrations (Haung et al 1978). Various treatment techniques available for the removal of Cr (VI) from wastewater include reduction, precipitation, ion exchange and solvent extraction. Most of these methods require high investment of capital and also expensive chemicals, making them unsuitable for treating chromiumcontaining wastewater. Adsorption is by far the most effective
and widely used technique for the removal of toxic heavy metals from wastewater. (Selvi et al., 2001). Owing to the high cost and difficult procurement of activated carbon, efforts are being directed towards nding efcient and low cost adsorbent materials. A variety of low cost materials like y ash (Narayanswamy., 1982), wood charcoal (Deepak and Gupta., 1991), bituminous coal (Kannan and Vanangamudi., 1991), bagasse and coconut jute (Chand et al., 1994), rice husk carbon (Srinivasan et al., 1998), peat (Brown et al., 2000) and red mud (Gupta et al., 2001) and have been tried. Bagasse is a waste product from sugar rening industry. It is the name given to the residual cane pulp remaining after the sugar has been extracted. Bagasse is composed largely of cellulose, pentosan and lignin (Dinish and Kumar., 2002). The present study is undertaken with a view to assess the feasibility of raw sugarcane bagasse as an adsorbent for the Cr (VI) removal. The effects of various parameters such as adsorbent dose, pH, contact time and initial metal concentration on the adsorption process have been studied. Adsorption studies will also be carried out to evaluate the adsorptive capacity of the adsorbent.
Raw sugarcane bagasse was collected from a night market in Kampong Kerinchi, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. It was cut into small pieces, washed several times with distilled water and kept in an oven maintained at 100C for a period of 24 hours. Then the material was ground and sieved to get desired particle size of 300 to 425 m. For the preparation of synthetic wastewater, all the chemicals used were of analytical reagent grade. Stock chromium (VI) solution (1,000 mg/L) was prepared by dissolving 2.828 g potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7) in 1,000ml double-distilled water. All working solutions of different
37
Figure1: Variation of Cr (VI) removal versus adsorbent dose at different metal concentrations
concentrations were prepared by diluting the stock solution with distilled water. The pH of the test solutions was adjusted using reagent grade dilute sulphuric acid and sodium hydroxide. Glassware was cleaned by overnight soaking in nitric acid and multiple rinsing with distilled water. A pH meter (Model: HI
8417, HANNA Instruments) was used to measure the pH of solutions. The effect of agitation rate was studied by shaking the solution in a HOTECH orbital shaker (Model: Gyromax 720). After agitation, the adsorbate and adsorbent were separated using a 0.45 m membrane lter (Schleicher &
38
Figure 3: Variation of Cr (VI) removal versus contact time at different metal concentrations
Schuell, Fed. Rep. of Germany). The chromium concentrations were analysed by a Perkin Elmer model 3100, atomic absorption spectrophotometer. All the analyses were performed according to Standard Methods for the examination of water and wastewater (1992).
The adsorption studies ware carried out by batch technique. For this investigation, a series of ask containing equal volume (50 ml in each case) of adsorbate solutions of varying concentration were employed, at desired pH and temperature. A suitable dose of adsorbent was added into each
39
conical ask. The samples were adjusted to the desired pH by using reagent grade sulphuric acid and sodium hydroxide solution. The samples were then agitated in a shaker at 165 rpm at room temperature (261C) for pre-selected contact time. After agitation, the solutions were ltered and the concentrations of Cr (VI) in the solution were analysed by atomic absorption spectrophotometer. The effect of adsorbent dose, pH, contact time and initial Cr (VI) concentration on the adsorption efciencies were studied.
Effect of adsorbent dose The effect of adsorbent dose on removal of Cr (VI) at different metal concentrations (10 and 50 mg/L) has been shown in Figure 1. The results shown in the gure indicate that the percentage removal of Cr (VI) increases with an increase in adsorbent dose. This is due to increase in the surface area of sugarcane bagasse and hence more active sites are available for the adsorption of the metal ion. It is also evident from the gure that at an adsorbent dose of 7 g/L the removal efciency of Cr (VI) is found to be 70.2% at an initial metal concentration of 10 mg/L at pH 1 and 4 hours contact time. But the removal efciency drops to 30.18% when the Cr (VI) concentration is increased to 50 mg/L at above experimental conditions. Effect of pH Variation of Cr (VI) removal versus pH at different metal concentrations is depicted in Figure 2. The percentage removal of Cr (VI) increases with decrease in pH value. At an initial Cr (VI) concentration 10 mg/L the percentage removal is 70.2% as compared to its adsorption at higher concentration (50 mg/L) which is recorded as 30.18% at pH 1. While at pH 4 the percentage removal efciencies were found to be 20.18% and 16.52% at an initial Cr (VI) concentration of 10 and 50 mg/L
respectively. The value of optimum pH is found to be 1. To study the effect of contact time on Cr (VI) removal from wastewater at different initial Cr (VI) concentration (10 and 50 mg/L), the experiments were carried out at different contact time (1, 2, 3, and 4 hours) with a xed adsorbent dose (7 g/L) and pH 1 at room temperature (261C). The response of contact time on Cr (VI) removal is shown in Figure 3. The percentage removal increased from 38.2% to 70.2% when the contact time was increased from 1 to 4 hours for initial metal concentration of 10 mg/L at pH 1. While an increased in the removal efciency was noted from 18.5% to 30.18% when the contact time was varied from 1 to 4 hours at initial metal concentration of 50 mg/L at pH 1.
The sugarcane bagasse has a great potential to remove chromium (VI) from wastewater
40
The logarithmic form of Freundlich model is represented by the following equation: log qe = log Kf + (1/n) log Ce (2)
where qe is the mass of the adsorbate adsorbed per unit mass of adsorbent (mg adsorbate/g adsorbent), while Ce is the equilibrium concentration of the adsorbate (mg/L). Kf and 1/n are Freundlich constants related to adsorption capacity and adsorption intensity respectively. The values of constant Kf and 1/n are obtained from the plot of log (x/m) against log Ce, for the adsorption data of Cr (VI), which is shown in Figure 5. It is evident that the data is well tted to the Freundlich isotherm and can be represented by the following mathematical expression: x/m = 0.0086 Ce4.380
Conclusion
From the present study, it can be concluded that the sugarcane bagasse has a great potential to remove chromium (VI) from wastewater. The percentage removal of Cr (VI) depends on adsorbent dose, pH, contact time, and initial Cr (VI) concentration. At 4 hours contact time and initial metal concentration of 10 mg/L, 70.2% Cr (VI) removal was observed but when the metal concentration was increased to 50 mg/L the removal efciency dropped to 30.8%. Sugarcane bagasse adsorbed chromium ions best at lower Cr (VI) concentration in the range of 10 to 20 mg/L but the removal efciency dropped to 19% when the metal concentration was increased to 70 mg/L. The adsorption data for Cr (VI) tted well to the Freundlich isotherm. WWA
Enquiry No: 006
This paper is written by Dr Nasim Ahmad Khan (department of civil engineering, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India) and Mr Hapsah Mohamad (department of civil engineering, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia).
41