Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Mitsuru Watanabe
Fujinomiya-shi Shizuoka-ken 418-0114 Japan
§1. Introduction.
In the General relativity, a metric is used as mathematical expression
of the gravity. However, the metric does not resemble gravity. It will
be a local inertia coordinate to be good for expression of the gravity.
We define ’point-coordinate-systems’ as a mathematical expression of
the local inertia coordinate. The way of a new gravity theory opened
out hereby. On the other hand, we define ’light-cone’. A new mathe-
matical model of space-time is made by this ’point-coordinate-systems’
and ’light-cone’. An interesting vector Ai appears when we define a
light-ray on this model. This Ai will behave like a vector potential of
electromagnetism.
2.1 Tensors.
In this paper, the definition of the tensor followed the reference[1].
We easily introduce it here.
The definition of a tensor of type (m, n) is the following. We describe
ij
it by using the example. Let us consider a set of real functions Tklm
ij
in the N -space consisted of N 5 elements. It is said that the set Tklm
is a tensor of type (2,3), if they transform on change of coordinates
(xi ) → (x̄i ) , according to the equations
op
Here, T̄qrs is defined on coordinates (x̄i ) .
A covariant vector Ai is a tensor of type (0,1) because it transform
as follows.
∂xj
Āi = Aj . (2.1.2)
∂ x̄i
A contravariant vector Ai is a tensor of type (1,0) because it transform
as follows.
∂ x̄i j
Āi = A . (2.1.3)
∂xj
z ∂xi ∂ 2 z l
Γijk (P ) = . (2.2.1)
∂z l ∂xj ∂xk
Here, this partial derivatives are evaluated at the origin of (z i ) of P . In
this paper, z Γijk are called the coefficients of connection defined by the
point-coordinate-system (z i ) .
∂xj
Ēi = Ej . (2.3.1)
∂z i
It is eazy to prove the following.
∂z k ∂z l ∂ Ēk ∂Ei z
i j l
= − Γlij El . (2.3.2)
∂x ∂x ∂z ∂xj
Here, ∂ Ēk /∂z l are evaluated at the origin of (z i ) . The expression
z
∇j Ei is defined by the left-hand side or the right-hand side of (2.3.2).
3
∂z k ∂xi ∂ F̄ l ∂F i z
= + Γijl F l . (2.3.4)
∂xj ∂z l ∂z k ∂xj
z
∇i f = ∂i f. (2.3.5)
z
∇k gij = ∂k gij − z
Γpki gpj − z
Γpkj gip . (2.3.6)
z z
We can prove that ∇i f is a tensor of type (0,1) and ∇k gij is a tensor
of type (0,3).
Let Ai and Bi be two tensor of type (0,1). Let Eij be a tensor of
type (0,2). Let g ij be a tensor of type (2,0). Then, we can prove the
following.
z z z
∇k (Ai + Bi ) = ∇k Ai + ∇k Bi .
z
∇k (gij v j v j ) = (z ∇k gij )v i v j + gij (z ∇k v i )v j + gij v i (z ∇k v j ).
z
∇k (f Eij ) = (z ∇k f )Eij + f (z ∇k Eij ).
z
∇k (g ij Aj ) = (z ∇k g ij )Aj + g ij (z ∇k Aj ).
z dv i dxi
[xi /t] = + z
Γijk v j v k , v i = . (2.4.1)
dt dt
The z [xi /t] are vectors on the curve xi (t).
Let xi (t) be the solution of z [xi /t] = 0 . If we change the parameter
from t to s , then xi (s) generally is not the solution of z [xi /s] = 0 .
Therefore, t is the special parameter of this curve. The t is called a
orthonormal parameter of this curve in this paper.
Let t be the orthonormal parameter. Let c be an arbitrary constant.
Then ct is also the orthonormal parameter. In addition, if s is an arbi-
trary orthonormal parameter, then we have s = c̄t as follows. Here, c̄ is
a certain constant. By using (3) of section 2.5,
³ dt ´2 d2 t i dxi
z
[xi /s] = z
[xi /t] + 2
v = 0 , vi = . (2.4.2)
ds ds dt
By (2.4.2), we obtain d2 t/ds2 = 0 ,i.e., s = c̄t .
In (2,4,1), the vector v i is defined only on the curve, however we
virtually can extend v i to neighborhood of the curve. Then we can
write z [xi /t] as follows.
³ ∂v i ´
z
[xi /t] = + z
Γijk v j v k = (z ∇k v i )v k . (2.4.3)
∂xk
Lemma 2.4.1
Suppose that the coefficient of connection z Γijk and the metric tensor
gij are given in the N -space. Let the curve xi (t) be a solution of z [xi /t] =
0 . Let a parameter s be the arc-length measured with gij along this
curve . Then, we obtain the following.
d2 s 1 z ³ ´2 dxi
i j k ds i
− ( ∇ k gij )V V V = 0 , V = . (1)
dt2 2 dt ds
d2 t 1 dt
+ (z ∇k gij )V i V j V k = 0. (2)
ds2 2 ds
(proof) By (3) of section 2.5,
³ ds ´2 d2 s i
z
[xi /t] = z
[xi /s] + V = 0.
dt dt2
5
z
0= ∇k (gij V i V j )V k = (z ∇k gij )V i V j V k + 2gij (z ∇k V i )V k V j .
Because (z ∇k V i )V k = z
[xi /s] , we have
By setting (4) to (3), we obtain the equation (1). Lastly, by using (1)
of section 2.5 to (1), we obtain the equation (2). 2
2.5 Formulae.
In this section, we give the formulae using in this paper. We can
prove these formulae by the simple calculation.
Suppose that t is some function of s , then we have
d2 s ³ ds ´3 d2 t
2
=− . (1)
dt dt ds2
Suppose that (xi ), (y i ) are two coordinates in the N -space and xi (t) is
a curve in the N -space , then we have
d2 y i
= 0.
dτ 2
By using (2) of section 2.5, we have
The (3.1.2) is the equation of the free-fall and the proper-time τ is the
orthonormal parameter of this curve.
we obtain
(y ∇k Gij )v i v j v k = 0. (3.2.6)
The equation (3.2.6) has to apply to all the light-rays starting from
P . Therefore, the polynomial (y ∇k Gij )X i X j X k can just be divided by
the polynomial Gij X i X j , because Gij X i X j is irreducible by Lemma
3.2.1 (→ reference[2]) . Therefore 2Ai exists as follows.
y
∇k Gij X i X j X k = (2Ai X i )(Gjk X j X k ). (3.2.7)
we have
y
∇k Ḡij X i X j X k = (∂k λ)Gij X i X j X k + λ y ∇k Gij X i X j X k . (3.2.9)
Lemma 3.2.1
If Gij is a light-cone, the polynomial Gij X i X j is irreducible.
(proof) We will lead a contradiction from the supposition which
Gij X i X j is reducible. By a certain non-singular matrix Sij , we have
Gij X i X j = ai X i bj X j . (2)
Therefore we have
1
Gij = (ai bj + aj bi ). (3)
2
By using (1) and (3), we have
1 k l 1
Bij = Si Sj (ak bl + al bk ) = (āi b̄j + āj b̄i ). (4)
2 2
Here,
āi = Sip ap , b̄i = Sip bp . (5)
Therefore we have
1 1
b̄1 = − , b̄2 = − . (7)
ā1 ā2
1
0 = B12 = (ā1 b̄2 + ā2 b̄1 ). (8)
2
By setting (7) to (8), we have
1 ³ ā1 ā2 ´
0=− + . (9)
2 ā2 ā1
9
d2 τ 1 y i j k dτ i dxi
+ ( ∇ k Gij )V V V = 0 , V = . (3.3.2)
ds2 2 ds ds
On the other hand, according to the section 3.2 ,
d2 τ dτ
2
+ (Ak V k ) = 0. (3.3.4)
ds ds
Let P, Q be two point on the xi (τ ) . We consider
Z P
ζ(P ) = − Ai dxi + C. (3.3.5)
Q
dτ = exp(ζ)ds, (3.3.6)
then
d2 τ dζ dxi
2
= exp(ζ) = − exp(ζ)Ai . (3.3.7)
ds ds ds
The equation (3.3.7) shows that τ is the solution of the equation (3.3.4).
In this paper, ζ is called a space-time-potential.
By (3.3.6),
dτ 2 = exp(2ζ)Gij dxi dxj . (3.3.8)
10
i.e.,
dx0 + Ai dxi = 0. (3.3.11)
Here, Q and C are not fixed. Then, let us suppose that the proper-time
does not vary by the gauge transformation. That is,
Therefore
ζ(P ) = ζ̄(P ) + η(P ). (3.3.16)
∂x0 ∂xj
Ā0 = 0
A0 + 0 Aj = 1 + δ0j Aj = 1, (3.3.18)
∂ x̄ ∂ x̄
∂x0 ∂xj
Āi = A 0 + Aj = ∂i η + δij Aj = Ai + ∂i η. (3.3.19)
∂ x̄i ∂ x̄i
Generally by using (3.3.17), a symmetric tensor cλµ of type (0,2)
transform as follows.
0 = g 0ν gν0 = δ00 = 1.
As a result, we obtain
1
hλµ = gλµ + (aλ Aµ + aµ Aλ ). (3.4.4)
2
12
By using (3.4.4),
h00 = a0 . (3.4.8)
h0j = a0 Aj . (3.4.9)
aj = a0 Aj .
dl2 = hλµ dxλ dxµ = h00 dx0 dx0 = a0 dx0 dx0 . (3.4.12)
References
[1] S.Isihara,Kikagaku-gairon(Kyouritu-suugaku-kouza,9),Kyouritu-
syuppan,Tokyo,1995.
[2] T.Takagi,Daisuugaku-kougi,Kyouritu-syuppan,Tokyo,1995.