Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 3

Losses - A Strategic Approach

Craig Lucas Tony Woods Cliff Walton


Craig.lucas@powerplanning.com tony@cre8is.co.uk cliff@cre8is.co.uk

System Losses - Why do they matter reduction of losses, and there are growing
incentives on companies to show they are
Electricity system losses affect the operation of actively managing their carbon footprint. In
every network operator and supply business, talking to senior distribution business managers
and in extreme cases can threaten the very from around the world, we find that losses are
financial sustainability of companies. When a increasingly their number one topic of future
power company generates a unit of energy, not concern. This is not just because losses directly
all of this will arrive at the consumer's affect the bottom line, and the level of capital
premises. This is because power networks investment requirements, but in some cases
inherently consume and lose a proportion of the threaten the very viability and financial
energy transported. In industry terminology we sustainability of the company itself.
call these `Technical Losses.'
Losses also impact stakeholder perception, and
In addition, no power utility in the world has in consequence the ability of the company to
perfect commercial processes, so billing 100% invest and grow to meet the needs of its
of the electricity that has been used by customers.
customers just does not happen. We call these
losses `non-technical' or `commercial' losses.
Technical Distribution (or System)
Losses occur at all levels, from generation, Losses
through transmission and distribution, to the
consumer and the meter. It is normally at the For the distribution system operator Technical
distribution level where the majority of Losses will always arise as the physics of
avoidable losses occur. The variation in the electricity transport means that no power system
level of System Losses experienced by different can be perfect in its delivery of energy to the end
utility companies, as measured by the customer. There is no absolute optimum level of
difference between generation input and energy Technical Losses as this is essentially a trade off
sales, is immense. In Western Europe System between the costs of the energy and generating
Losses account for 6-10% of energy supplied. capacity required to supply the losses incurred,
In other markets this figure can be 40% or even versus the capital costs of the network
higher. infrastructure to reduce them.

In theory, a utility with high losses may be able The level of losses incurred depends on some
to cover them by raising tariffs but this is often fundamental characteristics of the system, such
commercially, socially or politically impossible. as whether the network is urban or rural, what
This also matters because often utilities with the plant and equipment has been procured and
highest losses are also often in markets where installed in the past, the voltage levels
the customer has the least ability to pay. Even in employed, the system utilisation and load factor,
mature markets, regulators set targets and and not least the way the system is managed.
incentives for the However, in our experience there
are a number of common factors that point to looking at setting or revising system design
higher than average losses and which a standards.
successful loss reduction strategy will address
through proven processes and techniques. High or Medium Voltage Systems

Low Voltage Systems Work at these levels follows a similar


methodology involving an initial overall
The majority of avoidable losses generally assessment of the appropriateness of system
occur at the lowest level of the network closest design and the maturity of the loss
to the consumer. This is because the low management systems in use within the
voltage system is often the most extensive part company. Measures here tend to involve
of the system, and, conversely, often the least looking at the design of the network, the
well-documented and managed. There are a location and size of substations, and
wide variety of causes of such losses many of specification of network components. As few
which are rooted in design and operational customers are connected at this level, the
practices. Understanding and ranking the chance to make `quick wins' can be more
importance of these issues is a key step in cost limited. For this reason it makes sense to start
effective loss reduction. from the lowest level of the network and work
upwards as this generally gives the fastest
Our methodology works on the basis of an payback. Nevertheless, there are real benefits
initial high level assessment of the to be had at higher voltage levels although they
appropriateness of system design and the tend to be longer-term in nature and incur high
maturity of the loss management systems in use capital costs.
within the company. Having identified potential
key opportunities we work on the basis of Non-Technical Distribution Losses
measuring and studying a sample of the system
in quite a high level of detail. The sections Non-technical distribution losses - sometimes
chosen should be as `typical' as possible for the called commercial losses - is a coverall term
system as a whole. for all losses that occur in electricity systems
other than those that happen as a result of
A strategy for optimising these sample areas of thermal, electrical insulation and magnetic
network can then be scaled up with predictable effects in the plant, cables and lines that make
levels of accuracy. The issues and solutions up the system.
vary from company to company, but include
using these localised studies to draw up a By their nature non-technical losses can only
management plan addressing design, be estimated by subtracting Technical Losses
construction, and operation of the network. from overall total System Losses. As overall
Proven strategies can then be applied total System Losses and Technical Losses are
consistently over a wide area to achieve large themselves estimates, inevitably there must be a
scale sustainable and quantifiable success. degree of uncertainly about the accuracy of the
resulting estimate of non-technical losses. A
Whilst the individual techniques are sound methodology is essential to ensure
conceptually simple, designing an overall appropriate estimation accuracies are achieved
strategy which provides the best cost-benefit to avoid misleading results and inappropriate
requires consistent reliable data, deep targets being set.
experience and consideration of whole-life In even the most well managed utility there is
costs. Losses also need to be carefully likely to be a significant element of non-
considered in the context of other measures of technical loss and constant vigilance is
performance and costs and particular when required to ensure that such losses remain
small and tightly controlled. In some cases the Our Approach
level of such losses may become quite large -
perhaps more than 20% of the electricity We offer a strategic approach to this problem.
entering the system - and may exceed the level We start with a review which
of Technical Losses.
undertakes an initial high level
There are a large range of sources of non- assessment of the appropriateness of
Technical Losses which generally can be system design, business processes and
grouped under the following an assessment of maturity of the loss
headings:- § theft and fraud management systems in use within the
company.
identifies the overall level of system
technical problems with metering losses (validating the business
procedures by which this is calculated)
problems with billing systems carries out a assessment to gauge the
level of Technical Losses
problems related to human processes estimates the scale of non-Technical
such as meter reading, creation and Losses and - by examining the utility
closure of customer accounts, etc. experiences and business processes - the
likely sources of such losses
inaccurate or missing inventories of data We then propose a programme of proven
on customers solutions and activity to reduce both Technical
and Non-Technical Losses, together with a
With a large range of potential sources of these monitoring regime designed to oversee the
losses and considerable data complexity, implementation of the programme, providing
reducing non-Technical Losses requires a range the utility with evidence of progress and the
of initiatives to ensure sustained progress. ability to make changes as the programme is
executed.

Increasingly, new technologies are becoming


available to address these issues. Products such
as pre-payment meters, AMR and smart
metering all have potential to drive significant
improvements. However, as with all new
technology, improvements need to be viewed
`holistically' - i.e. the technology will only
have maximum effect if all the organisational,
behavioural, data management and commercial
factors are also addressed. We are involved in
leading research activities and programmes in
this area, and will provide more details and
case studies as they progress.

For further details about this or any related


topics see:

www.powerplanning.com www.cre8is.co.uk

Power Planning Associates: +44 1483 544944


Cre8 Innovation Solutions: +44 20 8325 6560

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi