The article discusses about the xxx/debate on xxxx ,bases its arguent on the fact that [describe the

ain topic].The professor discusses about the passage theory/debate/experiment/ and casts doubts on its validity.

First, the passage states that xxx by providing the example. For instance, In contrast, the professor illustrates the idea of y. for example, Hence, he/she contradicts the facts provided by the author/article He/she casts doubts on the passage main idea.

Second, the passage pushes forth the idea of x.for example, The speaker contradicts the idea of passage by illustrating with an example. For example, the idea of y Consequently, we can argue that indeed not x

Finally, the professor mentions /partly agree with the idea of article x. Because, article practically demonstrates topic. For example, However, the professor again contradicts the claim as y.

In summary, the points made in the lecturer contrasts with the reading. The professor demonstrates that Yyy has more advantages than the article. Therefore, we can say that the passage fails to support /describe the main topic Independent Task: Some think/argue that opinion 1 is right. Others think /argue that opinion 2 is right. But,the issue is a controversial one. In my opinion, by closer examination reveals that opinion 1/opinion2 for several reasons. First one is that reason 1, because the xxx . for example, this clearly states that the reason 1 ..

Another one/secondly, the reason2 is that yyyi will illustrate the reason 2 by following example. For instance, the yyy.due to this.. Therefore, the reason 2 demonstrates that

On the other hand, some argue that opinon 2/other opinion . For example, However, this casts doubts on the idea of opinon 2

In summary, while the arguments are to be made for both sides, it is clear that opinion1/opinion 2 is better than opinion 2/opinion1 because of all reasons mentioned above.

Integrated Writing Task: professor infavor to reading passage initially and later contradicts the second one in passage. Reading and lecture discuss/present the issue of /concept of /about debate xxxx. The professor is drawing on current and previous examples of xxx to illustrate the key characteristics of /concept of /theory xxxx presented in initial reading passage. The professor begins by relating some information about the current yyyy, which broke out/happened in year/date.He states that this yyy began in mexico and rapidly spread to more than 60 countries and infecting more than 20,000 people and killing around 120 victims. This description of current pandemic/xxxx supports the characteristics of /theory /debate /experiment xxxx stated in reading passage; namely it is an epidemic influenza virus that spreads worldwide and infects a large amount of people. In addition, the professor explains how the current pandemic follows up from three previous influenza pandemics. According to professor, they were flu pandemics in 1968 and 1957 killed millions of people And more severe one in 1918 called Spanish flu,which killed billions of people around the globe.this account of pandemic occurrence concurs with the point made in the reading that about three influenza pandemics happen each century , and they are irregular comparsion to regular seasonal outbreak of influenza.

Integrated task: Professor contradicts the passage The reading and lecture discuss the topic of the xxx/1918 influenza pandemic , also known as the spainsh flu.The professor casts doubts on several key beliefs about spainsh flu as they are presented in reading passage. To begin with , the professor explains how the spain is one of the countries to report cases of influenza

In summary, the points made in the lecturer contrasts with main idea in the reading article. The professor demonstrates that the concept x has more advantages than disadvantages presented in the article. Therefore, we can say that the reading passage has failed to support the main topic The article discuss about the topic/debate on topic x. the reading passage explains that topic x has many disadvantages .The professor discuss about the article main idea and casts doubts on its validity. To begin with , the professor explains that concept x as many disadvantages.for example, However , this contrast with the reading passage that concept x has advantages. Hence, he casts doubts on main idea presented in article. In addition to that, speaker also claims/states that concept x is For instance, debate /theory x has many other disadvantages, Although, this again contradicts the example provided in the article Which explains the facts provided with no evidence. Consequently, we can say that indeed not facts/examples explored in the reading passage. Finally, the professor mentions that /states that/claims that the concept is In summary, the points made in the lecturer contrasts with the reading passage. The professor demonstrates that concept/theory x should implement /no evidence to report it is the first country to be effected by influenza. Hence/therefore, the article fails to describe/support the main idea/topic.

The article and lecturer discuss about the concept x/theory x/debate or hot topic on x. The reading passage explains about the concept x /theory x or debate/hot topic. The professor supports the concept/theory x discussed in the article.

First, the professor begins with concept x/theory x /debate or hot topic .He illustrates with two specific examples. For example, the theory x says that Moreover, the reading passage also explains that debate/ theory x Hence, he supports the passage main idea from above points made from lecturer and reading article. In addition to that, speaker claims /states that topic deviates from its main idea .He exemplify with two simple examples. For instance, concept x has no.c Consequently , we can say that passage is deviating from main point discussed in the lecturer.

In summary, the points made in the lecturer contrast with reading passage . The professor demonstrates that concept x has to implement /more advantages than disadvantages presented in the article. Therefore , the passage fails to describe about the main idea .