Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 5

Visit: vaticancatholic.

com
Why would you say that Fr. Gruner is a schismatic? By Bro. Peter Dimond, O.S.B.
Why would you say that Fr. Gruner is a schismatic? Just wondering. I think he is a good Priest. -Sydney First of all, it should be pointed out that Fr. Gruner was ordained in 1976, after Paul VIs dubious New Rite of Ordination was introduced. Nicholas Gruners good friend, Fr. Paul Leonard Kramer, told me himself that he, Nicholas Gruner and Fr. Gregory Hesse were all ordained in the New Rite. Thus, none of them can be considered valid priests. Regarding why Nicholas Gruner is a schismatic, its very simple. Nicholas Gruner is not only a schismatic, but a heretic and an apostate. Gruner knows that Joseph Ratzinger, Antipope Benedict XVI, signed the book which states that the Jews wait not in vain for the Messiah. Yet, he holds a communion of faith with Ratzinger and accepts him as pope. (Remember, the Church is a communion of faith and government.) Therefore, Nicholas Gruner holds communion and shares faith with those who deny that Jesus Christ is the Messiah. Nicholas Gruner is an apostate. His acceptance of the Vatican II apostates as Catholics proves that Nicholas Gruner has no faith whatsoever. The same is true of all who are aware of Ratzingers t otal apostasy and still accept him as a Catholic. Gruner also accepted Antipope John Paul II as a Catholic after seeing loads of his apostasy. Gruner never once denounced him as a heretic, even though John Paul II promoted false religions, salvation outside the Church, and total apostasy again and again. Nicholas Gruner is a phony apostate. John Paul II also taught that we shouldnt convert schismatics. Nevertheless, Gruner accepted him as his fellow Catholic and leader. This shows that Gruner is also a schismatic for holding communion with John Paul, who was a schismatic. Gruner also had pictures of John Paul II in a positive way in his magazines for years and years, well after he was aware of John Paul IIs apostasy. Dont be deceived by the ostensible spirituality he claims to have or the spiritual truths he does emphasize. The Devil uses people like this, who mix truth with error and give the appearance of ascetism, to lead people astray. The heretic Arius the originator of Arianism, which ravaged almost the entire Christian world was effective in deceiving multitudes by his appearance of ascetism. Arius effectively deceived large numbers of brides of Christ (female religious) by his appearance of asceticism and spirituality, and they became one of his most effective means of spreading his heresy.

Visit: vaticancatholic.com
When a person mixes truth with apostasy or corrupts the truths of Christ, you know that his devotion is phony and insincere. Nicholas Gruner is that kind of phony. The truth is that he doesnt have true devotion to Our Lady; if he did he would denounce apostates who deny that Jesus Christ is the Messiah and he would not accept them as Catholics. He often cries in his talks. Give me a break. He can cry all he wants if hes telling people the truth, thus showing that he really cares; but when he spills forth lies such as the following, he proves himself to be a big phony who is used by the Devil: Nicholas Gruner, The Fatima Crusader, Summer 2000, The Third Secret Release Raises More Questions: However, I want to make something perfectly clear here and now. I absolutely do not suggest that the Holy Father [John Paul II] would deliberately and knowingly suppress some portion of the Third Secret of his own free will. There would have to be some other explanation. If there are two texts of the Third Secret of Fatima (we reject this idea, but this is what Nicholas Gruner claims) and John Paul II read both texts, as Gruner admits, then obviously John Paul II knew that the public was defrauded of the other text and John Paul II therefore lied to the public! So what Gruner says here is simply wicked dishonesty. Heres another evil quote from Gruners publication. In the quote, it is denied that John Paul II is without Catholic faith; in other words, The Fatima Crusader is asserting that he does have the Catholic faith. Fr. Paul Kramer, in The Fatima Crusader, Winter 2004, p. 32:The Secret of Fatima tells us, Our Lady tells us, the Mother of God reveals that the great apostasy in the Church will begin from there, from the Vatican. We can therefore surmise, and it has been prophesied down through the ages by the saints, that eventually Rome will be taken over by an Anti-pope, who will be entirely without Catholic faith, entirely heretical, unlike the present occupant of the See of Peter, who in his heart wishes to preserve and save the Church, but in his intellect, behaves as if he were the Churchs worst enemy, by promoting the very things which will lead to the destruction of the Church. Rome will be taken over by an Anti-pope, who will be entirely without Catholic faith, entirely heretical Hmmm? Whom could that possibly be? Could it be the man who removes the crucifixes from Catholic churches and allows Voodoo highpriests to preach to the people? Hmmm could it be the man who declares that all men are saved and that the Holy Ghost is responsible for false religions of Satan? Hmmm... the man who kisses the Koran and asks St. John the Baptist to protect Islam? Could it be the man who praises Martin Luther, the United Nations and the Social Justice of Communist China? How about the man who teaches that there are saints and martyrs in false religions, and that Holy Communion should be given to heretics? How about the man who says that Masses are valid which have no words of Consecration? Hmmm the man who declares that Christianity is the deep amazement at each man and that man is the Christ, the Son of the Living God? Could it possibly be the man who overturns the Council of Trent, gives donations and relics to non-Catholic sects, and prays with the Jews for the coming of the Messiah?
2

Visit: vaticancatholic.com
Do the people at The Fatima Crusader think that the Antipopes who will overtake Rome will carry signs saying: I am a heretic! Do they think that they will announce to the people, We are the satanic antipopes who are to come! Any sincere person aware of the facts can immediately recognize that Antipope John Paul II and Antipope Bendict XVI are entirely without Catholic faith, entirely heretical John Paul II denied the entire Catholic faith and approved of every false religion. Ratzinger denies that Christ is the Messiah! The statement by Paul Kramer in The Fatima Crusader, approved by Gruner, that Antipope John Paul II is not the heretical antipope who is entirely without Catholic faith is evil. Nicholas Gruner, The Fatima Crusader, Summer 2000, The Third Secret Release Raises More Questions: We are supposed to believe that if the Pope is told not to mention Russia in the Consecration, then the Magisterium has spoken, and no one may suggest that the advice given to the Pope is wrong. Gruner here is implying that its not John Paul II who was primarily responsible for the failure to Consecrate Russia, but rather its the people around him who are primarily responsible. In my view, he clearly made this statement because he didnt want to offend the Novus Ordo heretics on his mailing list who wouldnt like it if he placed the blame squarely on Antipope John Paul II. Nicholas Gruner, The Fatima Crusader, Summer 2000, The Third Secret Vision Explained: [Regarding The Devil Dragging Down the Clergy]:Pope John Paul II goes further. He doesnt suggest; he affirms it. So both Popes are pointing us to that chapter of the book of the Apocalypse of the Bible. Pope John Paul II goes further; its quite extraordinary what he says in his homily He gives us a pointer. He quotes Chapter 12, verse 3 and 4, in which the verses he quotes is, and the dragon, meaning the devil, drags down one third of the stars of Heaven. Nicholas Gruner, The Fatima Crusader, Summer 2000, The Third Secret Raises More Questions: The Vatican Secretary of State clearly did not want to risk embarrassing Mr. Gorbachev, promoter of abortion around the world. It would spoil the illusion that we have entered the post-Fatima era of peace and brotherhood if some Catholic journalist were to stand up and make note of the fact that Gorbachev personifies the very culture of death the Pope has spent the past 20 years condemning. One traditionalist priest once correctly described The Fatima Crusader magazine as an evil mlange (mixture) of truth with error. Yes indeed, The Fatima Crusader is an evil mlange of truth with error. In one part of the magazine it correctly labels the apostasy at the Fatima Shrine as an abomination, while in the same issue it has two pictures of John Paul II, a quote from him on the Rosary, and tells us to Follow his directive (p.23). So, while they declare the event in Fatima an abomination, and even the abomination of desolation, they promote in a positive light the man who is ultimately responsible for this abomination and whose interreligious actions of a similar nature at Assisi form the very basis and justification for the abomination of desolation in Fatima. Thus, The Fatima Crusader mixes Our Lady of Fatima with apostasy; it condemns the
3

Visit: vaticancatholic.com
abomination in Fatima while it promotes again and again the man ultimately responsible for it (Antipope John Paul II). It finally mentions John Paul II as teaching a heresy in the Winter of 2004, while in the same issue it declares that John Paul II is not the heretical antipope who is entirely without Catholic faith. It lures its readers in by some beautiful truth on spiritual matters and Our Lady, while at the same time it leads them right back to the very sources of the apostasy. Nicholas Gruner is not a Catholic. Hes in communion with the apostate Vatican II sect, which denies that Jesus Christ is the Messiah. Hes loyal to Antipope Benedict XVI, who denies that Jesus Christ is the Messiah. Gruner is an apostate; one really doesnt need to say more. Of course, no Catholic could donate a penny to him or his heretical magazine, The Fatima Crusader. In addition to his deadly mixture of truth with error, one of the ways by which Fr. Gruners apostolate has become so influential is by propaganda. Here are some of the things that you can find on the website of his apostolate: His website (Fatima.org) calls his magazine Our Ladys magazine. It states: Click here to read more about Our Ladys magazine! Boy, who would want to disagree with or not support Our Ladys magazine the magazine of Our Lady herself! He calls his Book Service Our Ladys Book Service! Wow, we wish we could have the privilege of being Our Ladys Book Service. He calls his radio program Our Ladys Radio Program! And yes, you guessed it he calls his Apostolate, not just a Fatima Apostolate, but Our Ladys Apostolate! His website states: Shortly following the formation of Our Lady's Apostolate, Father Gruner began publishing the Fatima Crusader magazine. In 1980, Pope John Paul II directly encouraged Father Gruner in his Fatima work and the periodical has grown Wow, he must be some priest to run Our Ladys Apostolate the Apostolate of Our Lady herself! as well as her Radio Program, her magazine and her Book Service. Does anyone fail to see how presumptuous and arguably blasphemous this is? Oh, never mind its okay I almost forgot Gruner is, according to his Apostolate (i.e. Our Ladys Apostolate), the Fatima Priest! In truth, this is simply propaganda from a false prophet, and that is why Fr. Gruner has had such an influence on what people think about Fatima and the present situation. Propaganda is defined as organized scheme, for propagation of a doctrine or practice. To dub almost every aspect of his apostolate Our Ladys is an organized scheme on the part of his apostolate to build itself up as the voice of Our Lady herself. Besides being wickedly presumptuous, this propaganda brainwashes people just like the propaganda from the mainstream media. When they hear this stuff over and over this is Our Ladys apostolate and Our Ladys magazine and Our Ladys Book Service they are often brainwashed to follow everything he says on Fatima, support him vigorously (for who wouldnt want to support Our Lady?) or consider Gruner to be Our Ladys personal representative. Since people are so gullible, it has been a major factor in how big his apostolate has become. That is why his apostolate continues to use this type of propaganda so often. Its why so
4

Visit: vaticancatholic.com
many have been brainwashed not to consider anything on this issue that doesnt conform to Fr. Gruners views. By the way, Gruner stated in one of his letters that he wants to send the book Fatima Priest (which is the story of his life) to every bishop in the world! What a complete waste. The book Fatima Priest, which is replete with pictures of Gruner from throughout his life including as a baby, which is basically all about him and what a hero he supposedly is, has been translated into various languages to spread the Good News of Nicholas Gruner around the world. All of this explains why Gruner consistently promoted pictures of Antipope John Paul II in his magazine for years (in a positive light) after he was aware of John Paul IIs apostasy. For Gruner, it wasnt about telling people the truth; it was about keeping himself popular and seen as a hero with a somewhat mainstream Catholic audience by promoting John Paul II and Fatima at the same time. Only a very wicked man would not have denounced John Paul II once he became aware of his apostasy, and thats exactly what Nicholas Gruner is.