Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Laplace:
An intelligence knowing, at a given instant of time, all forces acting in nature, as well as the momentary positions of all things of which the universe consists, would be able to comprehend the motions of the largest bodies of the world and those of the smallest atoms in one single formula, provided it were sufficiently powerful to subject all data to analysis. To it, nothing would be uncertain; both future and past would be present before its eyes.
A point mass is surrounded by N much smaller masses on nearly circular, nearly coplanar orbits. Is the configuration stable over very long times (up to 1010 orbits)?
many famous mathematicians and physicists have attempted to find analytic solutions or constraints, with limited success (Newton, Laplace, Lagrange, Gauss, Poincar, Kolmogorov, Arnold, Moser, etc.) only feasible approach is numerical solution of equations of motion by computer, but:
needs 1012 timesteps so lots of CPU needs sophisticated algorithms to avoid buildup of truncation error
geometric integration algorithms + mixed-variable integrators
= G
PN
m j (x i x j ) j = 1 jx i x j j3
+ small corrections
Unknowns include:
asteroids and Kuiper belt (fractional effect < 10-7) solar quadrupole moment (fractional effect < 10-10) mass loss from Sun through radiation and solar wind, and drag of solar wind on planetary magnetospheres (<10-14) 1 AU = 1 astronomical unit Galactic tidal forces (fractional effect <10-13) = Earth-Sun distance passing stars (closest passage about 500 AU) Neptune orbits at 30 AU
Masses mj known to better than 10-9M Initial conditions known to fractional accuracy better than 10-7
0 - 55 Myr
+4.5 Gyr
-55 0 Myr
-4.5 Gyr
Pluto s inclination
Kuiper belt objects Plutinos (3:2) Centaurs comets as of March 8 2006 (Minor Planet Center)
difficult to predict, erratic small differences grow exponentially at large times: x, v exp(t/tL) where tL is Liapunov time appears regular on timescales short compared to Liapunov time linear growth on short times, exponential growth on long times e.g. roulette, dice, pinball, weather, billiards, double pendulum
Chaotic
t , r a e n li
10 Myr
exp(t /tL )
Laskar (1989)
Pluto
Jupiter
The orbit of every planet in the solar system is chaotic (Sussman & Wisdom 1988, 1992) separation of adjacent orbits grows exp(t / tL) where Liapunov time tL is 5-20 Myr factor of at least 10100 over lifetime of solar system
saturated
Hayes (astro-ph/0702179)
r y M 2 1 = tL
Integrators: 200 Myr
double-precision (p=53 bits) 2nd order mixed-variable symplectic method with h=4 days and h=8 days double-precision (p=53 bits) 14th order multistep method with h=4 days extended-precision (p=80 bits) 27th order Taylor series method with h=220 days
Laskar (1994)
start
finish
Consequences of chaos
orbits of inner planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars) are chaotic with e-folding times for growth of small changes (Liapunov times) of 5-20 Myr (i.e. 200-1000 e-folds in lifetime of solar system chaos in orbits of outer planets depends sensitively on initial conditions but usually are chaotic positions (orbital phases) of planets are not predictable on timescales longer than 100 Myr the solar system is a poor example of a deterministic universe shapes of some orbits execute random walk on timescales of Gyr or longer most chaotic systems with many degrees of freedom are unstable because chaotic regions in phase space are connected so trajectory wanders chaotically through large distances in phase space ( Arnold diffusion ). Thus solar system is unstable, although probably on very long timescales most likely ejection has already happened one or more times
JSUN
Holman (1997)
Causes of chaos
chaos arises from overlap of resonances orbits with 3 degrees of freedom have three fundamental frequencies i. In spherical potentials, 1=0. In Kepler potentials 1=2=0 so resonances are degenerate planetary perturbations lead to fine-structure splitting of resonances by amount O() where mplanet/M*. two-body resonances have strength O() and width O()1/2. three-body resonances have strength O(2) and width O(), which is matched to fine-structure splitting. Murray & Holman (1999) show that chaos in outer solar system arises from a 3-body resonance with critical argument = 3 (longitude of Jupiter) - 5(longitude of Saturn) - 7(longitude of Uranus) small changes in initial conditions can eliminate or enhance chaos cannot predict lifetimes analytically
(198 planets)
HD 82943
planet 1: m sin I = 1.84mJ P = 435 d e = 0.18 0.04 planet 2: m sin I = 1.85mJ P = 219 d e = 0.38 0.01
(Mayor et al. 2003)
(6 planets)
primary (visible)
secondary (infrared)
mass = 0.69 Jupiter masses radius = 1.35 Jupiter radii ( bloated ) orbital period 3.52 days, orbital radius 0.047 AU or 10 stellar radii stellar obliquity < 10o T = 1130 150 K sodium, oxygen, carbon detected from planetary atmosphere
Transit searches
COROT (France)
launched December 27 2006 180,000 stars over 2.5 yr 0.01% precision
Kepler (U.S.)
launch 10/2008 100,000 stars over 4 yr 0.0001% precision
(4 planets)
Gravitational lensing
surface brightness is conserved so distortion of image of source across larger area of sky implies magnification
Beaulieu et al. (2006): 5.5 (+5.5/-2.7) MEarth, 2.6(+1.5/-0.6) AU orbit, 0.22(+0.21/-0.11) MSun, DL=6.61.1 kpc
this is one of the first three planets discovered by microlensing, but the detection probability for a lowmass planet of this kind is 50 times lower terrestrial planets are common
planets are remarkably common, especially around metal-rich stars (20% even with current technology) probability of finding a planet mass in metals in the star
wide range of masses up to 15 Jupiter masses down to 0.02 Jupiter masses = 6 Earth masses incomplete
eccentricities are much larger than in the solar system biggest eccentricity e = 0.93
tidal circularization
current surveys could (almost) have detected Jupiter Jupiter s eccentricity is anomalous therefore the solar system is anomalous
Phase 2
subsequent dynamical evolution of planets due to gravity lasts 99.99% of lifetime (10 Gyr) involves very simple physics (only gravity)
Theory of evolution
subsequent dynamical evolution of planets due to gravity lasts 99.99% of lifetime (10 Gyr) involves very simple physics (only gravity)
partially active active
most active systems end up with an average of only 2-3 planets, i.e., 1 planet per decade
inactive
partially active
active
all active systems converge to a common spacing (median a in units of Hill radii) solar system is not active
inactive
active
inactive
a wide variety of active systems converge to a common eccentricity distribution which agrees with the observations see also Chatterjee, Ford & Rasio (2007)
active
Summary
we can integrate the solar system for its lifetime the solar system is not boring on long timescales planet orbits are probably chaotic with e-folding times of 5-20 Myr the orbital phases of the planets are not predictable over timescales > 100 Myr Is the solar system stable? can only be answered statistically it is unlikely that any planets will be ejected or collide before the Sun dies most of the solar system is full , and it is likely that planets have been lost from the solar system in the past the solar system is anomalous currently, planet-formation theory in Phase 1 (first 1 Myr) has virtually no predictive power relative roles of Phase 1 and Phase 2 (last 10 Gyr) are poorly understood, but Phase 2 may be important a late phase of dynamical evolution lasting 10-100 Myr can explain two observed properties of extrasolar planet systems: eccentricity distribution typical separation in multi-planet systems