Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Current
Name Post Dates of Issuances Location
A 11/2/97
B Riyadh 11/21/00
C Dubai 1/18/00
D \h Riyadh 10/17/00
E Riyadh 10/23/00,11/20/00
F Abu Dhabi 6/18/01
G Berlin 5/25/00
H Jeddah 9/3/00,9/4/00,
9/25/00,10/24/00,
10/24/01,10/28/00,
11/12/00,4/23/01,
6/12/01,6/13/01,
6/18/01,6/20/01
I Jeddah 4/3/99.4/7/99
J Berlin 5/18/00
10 19 plus 4
NJKrieg(4-1822) 12/30/02
Officers Issuing Visas
Current
Name Post Dates of Interviews Location
Riyadh 11/21/00
Dubai 1/18/00
Riyadh 10/17/00
^ Riyadh 10/23/00,11/20/00
Abu Dhabi 6/18/01
Berlin
Jeddah 9/3/00, 9/4/00,
9/25/00,10/24/00,
10/24/OM0/2S/00,
11/12/00,4/23/01,
A
C
Terrorist Timeline
1995 2ATTA shared an apartment with known consirator Ramzi Bin ALSHIBH in
Germany. ATTA and ALSHIBH as warehouse workers at a computer
company in Hamburg, Germany.
1998 2ATTA, Ramzi Bin AL-SHIBH, Marwan ALSHEHHI and Ziad JARRAH
and others formed and maintained an al Qaeda terrorist cell in Germany
2000-2001 2ln Florida made inquiries regarding starting a crop dusting company
18 MAYOO B2 Visa issued in Berlin
02JUNOO 4Czech officials, state ATTA arrives in Prague by bus and stays there for 24
hours
03JUNOO Entered the U.S. in Newark, Ceskoslovenske Aerol, Flight #52 from Prague,
Czech Republic(2)
JULOO 2ATTA and Marwan ALSHEHHI tour Airman Flight School in Norman, OK
but don't enroll ;
06JULOO 2ATTA and Marwan ALSHEHHI start pilot training at Huffman Aviation,
Venice, FL
17 JULOO i Registers a red Pontiac Grand Prix, at 4890 Pompano Rd, Venice FL
19JULOO 2ATTA and Marwan ALSHEHHI receive $9,985 wired from UAE into a
Florida SunTrust bank account
07AUGOO 2ATTA and Marwan ALSHEHHI receive $9,485 wired from UAE into a
Florida SunTrust bank account
30AUGOO 2ATTA and Marwan ALSHEHHI receive $19,985 wired from UAE into a
Florida SunTrust bank account
18SEPOO 2ATTA and Marwan ALSHEHHI receive $69,985 wired from UAE into a
Florida SunTrust bank account
05NOVOO 2Purchases flight deck videos for the Boeing 747 Model 200, Boeing 757
Model 200, and other items from a pilot store in Ohio ("Ohio Pilot Store")
11DECOO 2Purchases flight deck videos for the Boeing 767 Model 300ER and the
Airbus A320 Model 200 from the Ohio Pilot Store
1) Washington Post
2) 205 F.R.D. 183,30 Meaia L. Rep 1251
3) Guardian Unlimited Observer
4 ABC Net
—LAW ENF <ICEMENT SENSITIVE—
F< Official Use Only
21DECOO 4ATTA and Marwan ALSHEHHI get their pilot licenses. Around this time,
ATT A and other hijackers purchase global-positioning devices known as
GPS-3s from Tropic- Aero, an aviation-supply shop in Ft Lauderdale, FL
29/30DECOO i ATT A and Marwan ALSHEHHI pay for two three-hour jet simulator
lessons in Miami
27DECOO 4ATTA and Marwan ALSHEHHI abandon their broken-down small private
plane on a taxiway at Miami International Airport
29/30DECOO i ATTA and Marwan ALSHEHHI pay for two three-hour jet simulator
lessons in Miami
04JAN01 Departed the U.S. from Miami to Madrid on Iberia Lineas Aereas Flight
6122
10JAN01 Entered the U.S. in Miami, AA, Flight #69 from Madrid, Spain
FEB01 2ATTA and Marwan ALSHEHHI attended a health club in Decatur, GA
FEB01 i Inquires about crop-dusters at Belle Glade State Municipal Airport in Belle
Glade, FL
FEB01 i ATTA and Marwan ALSHEHHI visit Atlanta, rent a Piper Cherokee plane
FEB01 4ATTA and Marwan ALSHEHHI rent a single-engine Piper Warrior from a
Gwinnett County, Georgia flight school
2-15FEB01 2ATTA & Marwan ALSHEHHI took a flight check ride around Decatur, GA
FEB-MAR01 4ATTA and several other men inquire at South Florida Crop Care about
crop-dusting planes
11MAR01 lATTA and Marwan ALSHEHHI move out of their Hamburg apartment
APR01 4Czech Interior Minister, Stanislav GROSS says a meeting between ATTA
and Ahmad Khalil Ibrahim Samir AL-ANI, an Iraqi intelligence agent took
place in Prague, several weeks before AL-ANI was expelled from the
country April 22, 2001 for conduct incompatible with his diplomatic status.
There are reports that this was possibly the third or fourth meeting between
ATTA and AL-ANI
APR-JUN01 2ATTA, Satam ALSUQAMI, Waleed ALSHEHRI, Ahmed ALGHAMDI,
Majed MOQED, Marwan ALSHEHHI, Ahmed ALNAMI, Hamza
ALGHAMDI, Mohand ALSHEHRI Wail ALSHEHRI, Ahmed
ALHAZNAWI, Fayez Ahmed and Salem ALHAZMI traveled from various
points in the world to the U.S.
26APR01 i Receive a traffic ticket in Tamarac, FL for driving without a license
02MAY01 i ATTA and Ziad JARRAH get Florida driver's licenses. ATTA lists address
at 10001 N. Atlantic Blvd., Coral Springs, FL
13MAY-13JUN01 4ATTA and Marwan ALSHEHHI live in Jackson Street, Hollywood, FL
28MAY01 i Fails to appear in court in Broward County for driving without a license
oharge. A bench warrant is issued for his arrest
04JUN01 4A warrant is issued for ATTA's arrest due to his no-snow at his hearing for
his traffic offense
MIDJUN01 4ATTA and Marwan ALSHEHHI move into a Tara Gardens condo in Coral
Springs
1) Washington ist
2) 205 F.R.D. 3.3C vledia L. Rep 1251
3) Guardian U n m i t e d Observer
4) ABC Net
13JUN01 lATTA stays with Marwan ALSHEHHI, who moves into the Hamlet
Country Club, a gated community in Delray Beach
29JUN-01JUL01 i Stays at Econo Lodge in Las Vegas. 4lnvestigators say that ATTA met with
two other hijackers, Salem ALHAZMI and Hani HANJOUR during this trip
and that both Marwan ALSHEHHI and Ziad JARRAH were also in Las
Vegas
27JUN01 4ATTA flies from Ft Lauderdale to Boston
01JUL01 lATTA, Wail and Waleed ALSHEHRI, Satam Al SUQAMI, Marwan Al-
SHEHHI and Fayez BAN1HAMMAD register for one-month membership at
World Gym in Delray Beach and Boynton Beach
01JUL i Rents P.O. box in Delray Beach for three months. 4ATTA flies from
Boston to NY
03JUL01 4ATTA flies from Newark to Ft Lauderdale
07JUL01 Departed the U.S. from Miami on Aerolineas Argentina Flight #117.
4Spanish police say that according to airline records, ATTA flies into
Madrid, where he rents a car and then checks into a seaside hotel about 375
mile away, near Barcelona. He visits Spain extensively, logging more than
1200 miles in a rented car, and intelligence officials believe there were
meetings with suspected members of bin Laden's network (who were
recently arrested in Spain on charges unrelated to 9/1 1). Hotel records
confirm that ATTA spends his last night at the Monstsant Hostal in Salou,
I where he pays with visa and registers under his own name. There were also
reports that ATTA went to a prison southern Spain, where he asked to visit
an Algerian being held on murder charges. The Guardian reports that this
I- 08JUL
trip included a brief visit to Switzerland
2Purchased a knife in Zurich, Switzerland
I 09JUL01
19JUL01
i Flies from Miami to Spain
Entered the U.S. in Atlanta, Delta, Flight #109 from Madrid, Spain
!
I AUG 4ATTA and several other men ask about crop-dusting planes at an airstrip in
Belle Glade, FL. They want to know how much fuel and chemicals the
planes can carry and whether special skills are needed to pilot them. The also
approach South Florida Crop Care again, where ATTA leaves an impression
of being "real persistent".
I
I
r
1) Washington Post
2) 205 F.R.D. 183,30 Me,;ia L. Rep 1251
3) Guardian Unlimited Observer
4) ABC Net
06AUG01 i Rents a car from Warrick's Rent-a-Car in Pompano Beach, FL
13AUG01 i Spends night at Econo Lodge in Las Vegas. 4Both Hani HANJOUR and
Nawaf ALHAZAMI are also in Las Vegas at this time
15-19AUG01 4ATTA and Marwan ALSHEHHI rent a blue Chevy Corsica from Warrick's
Rent-A-Car, in Pompano Beach, FL and return it with almost 3000 miles
logged
16,17,19AUG01 i With three unidentified accomplices, rents a single-engine plane for 90
minutes from Palm Beach Training at Palm Beach County Park Airport.
4ATTA rents a single engine, four seater Piper Archer from the Palm Beach
County Airport at Lantana for 3 consecutive days of flying.
23AUG01 4ATTA's drivers license is suspended indefinitely when he fails to appear in
traffic court
25AUG01 i Opens frequent-flier account on AA web-site
26AUG01 lATTA and Marwan ALSHEHHI check into Panther Inn in Deerfield Beach
28AUG01 iBuys plane ticket using AA web-site. 2ATTA and Abdulaziz ALOMARI
reserved two seats on American Airlines Flight 1 1 listing a Florida telephone
number. 4ATTA flies from Baltimore to Ft Lauderdale
30AUG01 2Purchased a utility tool that contained a knife
04SEP01 2Sent FedEx package from Florida to UAE
07SEP01 lATTA and Marwan ALSHEHHI and a third unidentified man go to
Shuckum's a raw bar in Hollywood. ATTA plays video games, the others
have five drinks a piece and argue over the $48 bill
08SEP01 2An Arab male retrieved the package from ATTA at FedEx in Dubai UAE.
ATTA wired $2,860 to Mustafa AHMED in UAE. ATTA wired $5,000 to
Mustafa AHMED in UAE
09SEP01 lATTA and Marwan ALSHEHHI check out of the Panther Inn in Deerfield
Beach
10SEP01 lATTA and Abdulaziz ALOMARI stay overnight at the Comfort Inn, South
Portland, Maine
11SEP01 2ATTA and Abdulaziz ALOMARI flew from Portland, Maine to Boston
Massachusetts. ATTA possessed operating manuals for the Boeing 757 and
767, pepper spray; knives and German travel visas. ATTA, Abdul Aziz
ALOMARI, Satam Al-SUQAMI, Wail ALSHEHRI, and Waleed
ALSHEHRI hijacked American Airlines Flight 1 1, a Boeing 767, which had
departed from Boston; they flew flight 1 1 into the North Tower of the World
Trade Center.
3Mohamed ATTA, age 33, born at Kafr el-Sheikh in Egypt's Nile Delta and
brought up in Cairo. His father a lawyer. Education s adied architecture in
Cairo and town planning in Hamburg, trained as a pile* in Florida. Religious
education, member of syndicate led by Muslim Brothc hood. Friendships,
vide, from German Christians to fundamentalist Mus! ns
) Washington
.) 205 F.R.D. i ,30 Media L. Rep 1251
') Guardian Un lite ' Observer
) ABC Net
9/11 Working-level Employee
\E BUT UNCLASSIFIED
1 DEPARTMENT OF STATE
\ STATES INFORMATION AGENCY
\e of Inspector General
I \m of Conversation
\s for the 9/11 Hijackers Foreign Service Institute 2/5/03
\ Office Date
I I Bert Krieg and Kevin Hrvnkow
Official Inspector
Mr. Krieg stated that the purpose of the interview was to respond to a congressional inquiry
requesting that OIG report on visa issuances to 9/11 hijackers. He added that OIG's response
would not identify specific visa adjudicators.
Mr. Henry Sizer, Grievance Attorney of the American Foreign Service Association,
accompanied! |at the latter's request. j~ [answered the questions for the visa
adjudicators as follows.
1. For the record, please tell me your name, present rank and position.
2. Were you the officer (or consular associate) who issued nonimmigrant visas to (names of
applicants) on (dates) at (name of post)?
Yes.
No, it must be an electronic reproduction because those applications were shredded after one
year according to our standard destruction schedule for storage efficiency. We had very little
storage space at Embassy Berlin.
(See above)
4. Did you check the CLASS lookout system for his name, and what were the results?
Yes. There were no "hits," that is, no derogatory information about him.
Berlin's policy of expediting "good risk" TCNs (third country nationals) with a lengthy
residency status and the fact that Atta met that with 5 to 6 years residency and other criteria
meant that we would waive an interview for him. These long-time German residents were
basically treated like German citizens. German citizens are part of the visa waiver program, and
therefore they do not fill out visa applications nor apply for visas.
In addition to the above, only TCNs with less than 18 months to two years of residency were
interviewed.
Orally by the other office staff and my supervisor. I don't remember seeing anything in writing.
9. Were you personally given any instructions by your supervisors or superiors about asking
applicants to appear in person for an interview?
I was told that if an applicant's paperwork gave the appearance that he might be an intending
immigrant we would interview that person. Our focus was on stopping intending immigrants.
11. If so, what was the policy at post regarding travel agency procedures?
N/A
12. How were you informed of this policy? In writing? Orally? By whom?
N/A
13. Would a personal interview of this applicant have helped you decide his eligibility for a visa,
and why?
No, because he was a long-time resident. Atta met the criterion of being a quasi resident, and
therefore it was reasonable to assume that he would return to Germany.
14. If you interviewed this individual, what details can you recall?
N/A
He would have had a passport, some form of residency status from the local German police
district in Hamburg where he lived and source of income documents. I do not recall the specific
documents.
16. If so, can you recall any details of the documents that were presented?
No.
17. What specific elements obtained from the interview or the application convinced you that
this applicant was entitled to a visa?
I do not recall the specifics of this case. Looking at it now, Atta was a longtime resident of
Germany, he was not an intending immigrant, and there were no "hits" on CLASS.
18. Did you have sufficient time to conduct the interview or review the application to your
satisfaction? If not, how much time would you have preferred?
No. There was never enough time to interview the more than 25,000 applicants processed
through Embassy Berlin each year. However, time was not the issue in this case. The questions
on the interview form were not always the most useful in eliciting information about whether
someone was a terrorist or not. We only had two officers that conducted interviews at that time
and we could have used more. We needed not only more time but also better visa application
forms with more useful details for the applicants to fill out.
19. If there were sufficient consular officers at post to conduct personal interviews of every visa
applicant, would there have been sufficient interview windows, work space and support
staff?
No. Embassy Berlin covered a vast region of Germany including Hamburg, and we did not have
enough space or resources to handle the long lines that would develop outside. Applying for
visas was a real problem for applicants residing in distant parts of the consular district.
20. What other elements would have helped you make a better decision regarding the applicant's
eligibility for a visa and why?
Maybe better cooperation between the German police and other agencies at post would have
helped. We needed better information. An FSN to investigate TCN visa application claims
would have been useful At the time, I felt I made a good decision.
21. Did your superiors ever discuss the post's NTV refusal rates in general with you?
I I „ . 9/11 Law Enforcement
Yes, Berlin had about a| perusal rate. Sensitive
22. Did your superiors ever counsel you to raise or lower your own refusal rate?
23. Did you or anyone in the consular section conduct NIV return validation studies? If not, why
not?
Yes, they were done more or less ad-hoc. An FSN would telephone TCN applicants to follow-up
on their return to Germany.
Not at all. It was not an issue since I spoke and read German.
26. Do you consider that the training you received in the Department to carry out your visa
adjudication responsibilities was adequate?
Not really. It would be much better if the Department would allow new consular officers go to a
real post somewhere close by, like Mexico, for a week or two to get actual hands-on experience
before going to their first overseas post.
27. If not, what additional training would have enabled you to do a better job?
Consular officers need more practical application training for carrying out visa procedures.
28. What other comments would you like to make at this time regarding this visa case?
Team Number: 1A
Prior to departure, AA Flight 11, a Boeing 767 was serviced under the supervision
of Salvatore P. Misuraca. A FBI report of interview is the source for this information
(302-7431). Mr. Misuraca is a ramp service manager for American Airlines at Logan
International Airport. He is responsible for the cleaning, fueling and baggage loading of
American Airlines aircraft. On 09/11/2001 he supervised the cleaning, refueling and
baggage loading of AA Flight 11. AA Flight 11 was an aircraft that arrived from San
Francisco, CA at 6:00 am, and therefore was described as a "turn-around flight." Mr.
Misuraca stated that at 7:30 Donald Bennett, the crew chief for Flight 11 received a call
from a passenger service representative, stating that a passenger had just boarded Flight
11, and the passenger service representative wanted to determine if the passenger's two
suitcases had arrived from US Airways. Mr. Bennett told the passenger service
representative, also known as a gate agent, that the suitcases had arrived, but would not
be put on Flight 11, because the baggage compartment had already been locked for
departure. Mr. Misuraca noted that it was unusual for the passenger service representative
to call the ramp crew, unless the affected passenger has asked about the baggage.
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
The suitcases were then given to Philip A. DePasquale, the baggage expediter for
American Airlines at Logan International Airport. There is a FBI report of interview for
Mr. DePasquale (302-46163). Mr. DePasquale placed new tags on the suitcases and
placed them on a baggage belt to be loaded on to AA Flight 181. After the crash of
Flight 11 was reported, Mr. DePasquale examined the two suitcases. He stated that the
tags on the two suitcases had a covert marking that indicated that the suitcases belonged
to a passenger, "that was a security issue." Mr. DePasquale called Howard Crabtree, the
senior ramp supervisor for American Airlines, and told him that what he had determined.
Mr. Crabtree has a FBI report of interview (302-440). Mr. Crabtree examined the luggage
and directed Mr. DePasquale tq open the suitcases.
When the suitcases were opened, Mr. DePasquale and Mr. Crabtree found a
Koran, tapes on flying Boeing aircraft, a large folding knife, a pad with flight planning
data, and an instrument for calculating the weight on an aircraft. Mr. Crabtree contacted
the Massachusetts State Police (MSP). Sergeantf | arrived at the baggage office
and took custody of the two suitcases.
The two suitcases were searched by FBI agents at the offices of Troop "F" of the
MSP at Logan International Airport. The following items of interest were recovered
from Atta's Travelpro suitcase:
The following items of interest were recovered from al-Omari's Travel gear
suitcase:
There are two issues for the Commission to consider. First, is whether Atta
intended his luggage be discovered and searched? Based on what is reported as having
occurred, this is unlikely. The search of Atta's Travelpro suitcase provided early
information about the nature of the Islamist threat, the probable links to al Qaeda, and the
techniques used in the hijacking of the aircraft. Atta was concerned enough about
whether his luggage had been switched from US Airways Flight 5930 to American
Airlines Flight 11 that he made a last minute request to the gate agent about the suitcases.
It is conclusive, that Atta did not want his suitcase to be discovered and searched.
The second issue is the identification of Atta as a "security issue." The two
suitcases had a covert tag from US Airways to warn that Atta and his luggage were a
security issue. When a last minute inquiry was made, apparently on the behalf of Atta,
about the status of his suitcases, no one at American Airlines thought to search the
luggage. After the terrorist attacks this would become standard procedure. It is unclear
now what was the American Airlines' policy or the Federal Aviation Administration's
policy pre-09/11/2001, for the search of luggage that may pose a threat, or be evidence of
criminal activity.
N1V Applicant Detail Page 1 of 1
The United States Department of State - Bureau of Consular Affairs
SensiVve But Unclassified (SBU) - Information Protected under INA 222(f) and 9 FAM 40.4
BERLIN 20001389580003
Surname
ATTA
Given Name
Place of Birth
Egypt {EGYP)
\djudication History
Adjud Date Status
17-MAY-2000 Issued
Foil History
Foil Number Class Date Printed Foil Status
34137932 81/B2 18-MAY-2000 Printed and passed QA
Namecheck(s)
Seq# Status Source DNC/Class Hits DNC/Class Worst Hit Local Worst Hit Data Entry Date
1 RECEIVED CLASS 0 NR NR 17-MAY-2000
http://cadata.ca.state.gov/pls/pubHtfrpt jiiv^^
NIV Applicant Case Lookup Detail Page 1 of 1
The United States Department of State - Bureau of Consular Affairs
^^«L«3V
NIV Applicant Case Lookup Detail
^•^s^fr Report by \>n November, 19TH2001 13:39£T
Sensitive But Unclassified (SBU)- Information Protected under INA 222(f) and 9 FAM 40.4
Applicant Information
Name: Atta, Mohamed Mohamed Elamir \ ^IHMRIi^K
Post: Berlin (BRL) \ ' •ElF^Sl
Case Type: Applicant
**fS^*rSSn^r
Visa Control #: 20001389580003 \W
Creator ID: I Case Status: Closed \T
Source: Converted From Wang "".... ^^B^^^^P^^^
Gender. Male Nationality: Egypt
Date of Birth: 01SEP1968 Place of Birth: Egypt . 7 9 /ll Working-level Employee
Passport #: 1617066 Passport type: Regular .1
National ID: Tag: .,0 jl
Adjudication Data //
Adjudication 1: Issued
Adjudicated by: _.,•-" Adjudication Date: 17-MAY-2000
- Authorized by: Authorization Date: 17-MAY-2000
Visa Data
Visa Class: Visitor For Business And Pleasure (B1/B2) ;
Status: Finished Modified by: I I
Issued: 18-MAY-2000 Expires: 16-MAY-2005
Entries: M Validity: 60 /
Foil Number: 34137932 Status: Printed and passed QA
Type: Modified by: I 1
Date Printed: 18-MAY-2000 Date Spoiled:
Annotation:
Foil History
Foil Number Class Printed Foil Status Date Spoiled
34137932 B1/B2 18-MAY-2000 Printed and passed QA
Sensitive But Unclassified (SBU) • Information Protected under INA 222(f) and 9 FAM 40.4
Namechepk Data
NC1: RECEIVED Source: CLASS
DNC/Class Hits: 0 DNC/Class Worst Hit: NR
Local Hits: 0 Local Worst Hit: NR
Data entry date: 17-MAY-2000
Hit Override Description:
http://cadata.ca.state.gov/pls/public/rpt jiivjicjle^
HML
REC: 08NOV2001 13:19:51 RET: 08NOV2001 13:19:52 CLASS-E
ALL NR
SURNAMES CHECKED
01 ATTA/
END
9/11 Working-level Employee
Po*l: | |
MV Release: C303C-1
Non-Immigrant Visa Applicant Case Accountability Fopcrt ID: CS2
Narnecheck
HH(s): Worst Calagoty: Hit Ovenide Description: m
Sequence: I
CLASS: 0 NR e
Status: RECEIVED isi
Local MIV: 0 NR
m
i-
t-t
x
Adjudication o
X
Page t o!2
O z:
9/11 Working-level Employee
Post: I I
MV Release: C3.O3.C1
Non-Immigrant Visa Applicant Case Accountability RepcrtID: CS2
-n
Visa Foil fc
Visa Class Status Visa User ID Foil Number Slalus Dale Printed Spoiled Date Foil User D
B1/B2 Finished
CD
m
Page 2ol2
Post Users Page 1 of 1
The United States Department of State • Bureau of Consular Affairs
Post Users
Report bj|_ JonAtoi/emfter, 19TH2001 13:48 ET
Sensitive But Unclassified (SBU) - Information Protected under INA 222(f) and 9 FAM 40.4
Berlin (BRL)
User ID User Name FSO? Enabled? Password Last Change
Expiration Change User
1 07-Aug-2000 ,{_
Post:
User ID User Name FSO? Enabled? Password Last Change
Expiration Change User
Y 14-Mar-2002 15-Sep-2001 |
Webmaster: CA-DATA-£NG@state.qov
jSgra»tewf-v^^,-*wi^;
000000041
REQ #20-1 and 2
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
000000042
REQ #20-1 and 2
U.S. Department of Justice
Immigration and Naturalization Service
Intelligence Division
Forensic Document Laboratory (FPL)
Memorandum
TO: .....--""'9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
FROM:
The photocopies showed Egyptian passport #1617066, issued in Hamburg on 8 May 2000.,
as well as what appeared to be an Egyptian identity document, #M387555. The passport
showed a German "Aufentshaltsbewilligung" (indicating residence) numbered R00352475,
issued in Hamburg on 9 May 2000.
Only a few pages were photocopied. NIIS records indicate that ATTA made several entries
to the United States.
3 June 2000 Entered USA via Newark at OK 52 - Lexington Hotel, New York -
Departed 4 January 2001 via IB 6122
10 January 2001 Entered USA via Miami via AA 69 - 516 W Laurel Rd, Nokomis, FL
Entered USA via Miami, flight unknown - 10001 W Atlantic Blvd, Coral
Springs, FL - Departed 7 July 2001 via AR 117
19 July 2001 Entered USA via Atlanta on 19 July 2001 - 401A Greensward #204 in Del
Ray Beach, FL
NIIS indicates that ATTA travelled using a visa issued in Berlin on 18 May 2000. No other
passengers were connected to ATTA for any of these entries.
A copy of ATTA's visa was obtained from the Texas Service Center along with a copy of
the approved 1-539. This form indicated the 516 W Laurel Road address in Nokomis, FL.
The 1-539 was approved and ATTA was granted M-12 status.
State of Florida
Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles
FOR USE ONL Y AS AUTHORIZED B Y DHSMV
DRIVER LICENSE
QUO num5e< Class
A300-540-6&-321-0
MOHAMED ATTA
Address
10001 W ATLANTIC BLVD
CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33071-0000
Date of birth Se* Height
09-01-68 M 5-08
Restrictions
Fingerpnni file
None
issue date Issus time
05-02-01 15:36:28
Expiration dits Dup&cate
09-01-07 00-00-00
F"orm number
R010105020258
SAFE DRIVER
9/27/01
fi k-://C:\O WS\TEMP\Sub 1 ,jpg
SAC/TAMPA 0005/010
02/21/2002 11:26 FAI
• • '
]}
UNITED STATES
UNITED STATES CUSTOMS SERVICE
CUSTOMS DECLARATION
»EFma».M«.ia.i«.i».M«.iT(i. 10,111
-Each arriving traveler or responsible family member must provide the
fallowing information (only ONE nyrttten deflaration per family Is required):
1. Family name
S.AIrfine/RightNo.orV9saalNait«iorVahldeLfc8n8aNo. «. of Family
^7^^
C=i'Mr--~;=P;. ^ifei^i^S^S-SftW*:s .
•;•:>•:•: 'r^y'-v'^-'^fS 1.'"i"--:: - :;.;':£ ; * .'•'•
^^c^Hl'-^^UiSi^l^^l't^Sj^^/^P 7. (a) COunliK 7. (b) Courmy o< Realdane=
0
x-
Kl
10. The pu^soss o( my (our) trip la Of was; 1 | — IBualneas
„, _•__-.
|_J
fChe&raMOrbowiar£i>TT«pp'»caft/^ /
11. lam (e are) bringing Uuilv.planiH, meals, (two.
anil, birda, anails, other live animals, vvifdlifa _— -f^i— i- (j^7!
products. fannpredLids; or. have hcon on a firm ?c^ ---- 1—1^*5 Cul
ranch owsido the U.a: 7s^ \1 am (We are) carrying currency owforletary
v \—i ..
T \ 1
13.1 hava (Wa hjnnj) commercial merchandisa, U.S. i—i
of foreign: (Check one box only) 1 1 _ 1 Y8S 1 N°
14. The total value ol all good's, Including C / . /
da! merchandise. I/we purchased or i T.,^ /^
abroad and am/are bunging (o me U.S. a: (U.S, oeltosl
(See tfie Instructions on the ftadr of (fift bnn unrfacJMErtGMMD/SE" and us* (he space
fomided tnare to Sst all »• terns you musf daclace, ff you /lava nothing to dedyrg, mite '-0-'
in the apteo piuvksea above).
SIGN ON REVERSE
•Sr
I have read the notice on the reverse ai e aCtrgthful dedaration.
f
x_
Svoun
U.S. Custqrua^uae only- Ctoipotwrtte b«low this Una - U.S. Cusiomj Use only
SAC/TAMPA 0006/010
02/21/2002 11:26 FAX
NOTICE
ALLRASse^Gffi AHE SUBJECT TO FURTHER CX&lfn&itiSiWD TWSR PSOjiScJG,
.**
BEUSNGWQS. AND CONVEYANCE ARESUBJECTTO SEARCH. (18 CSSJ^sria).
TTx» unlawful tovunudun ofeamvIM substJraa (nafcctaa,,cnemtou..prescription medians* K
not acoxnpanlad by « powciWIon. nfc) regaifleoa of smflura sj a vBlaaon of US. to*
AGRtCUUURAL AMD VHLMJFE PROOUCTS
1 To confine anOYgfcangarDiJsaalculuralpa«arriwt*l*ad
act Runs. vogatauea, pboB. pianfpraducla, aat, moon, meat products, blrrfc, snafo. and ottwr
Due anfmab or «r*nal products, wWJjfl and wtdne pttduda, Fafluro to dadam al such tomato a
RH7TIHE OF flU. T>« CUHHaCiC OH INSmUMENTC, AND MAY SUBJECT YOU TO CWL
MgRCHAMDtSg
I .'.; • --'T-rS VtsnrttS |Wew-flE3fp£N75? mual deebra h Bern 14 «w total valuo or aB anfctes Intended br
dhsre and al Iwrne Mondod n be sold or toft m »B U.3. Trta Indudw an gifc and cornnwdaJ
•FeHL-li itomsorBBBiplw. (EXCSnioN: Vbur mm pareonaloffocte, suefi a=do«iln9.p™3onal)artriiyand
camocm aqulpnteM, (ugnapa. ofa, need not bp declared)
OS, RESIDENTS muat fladfara h lorn 14 *w lotol value or ALL ugctoa. tidudlna commends)
goods and sonplaa. Itnv acquired abroad (whoehw new or uart; SuSabfc or nceand«haiheiict»
BlneO by pgrctaee, noAJvad as a gB. or Qftowiw), Indudhg iheaa artUm purcnaaod hi DUTY
FflEE SiaBEB IN THE U.S. OR ABROAD, whfch aw In 0»ir posaolon at (he dme o« anfual, Ar-
tfcte wrtch you acqdrad on Ws tip matod from abroad, (olhar lhan aiVOei acquired In irauter
poaaeiiiorra and vaHnua Cgflbbenn BaaH carctes) an dutotiio upon iholranlvBl in tn U.3.
r
,
noornly enutled ID a du(y free cumpdon ol S*QO on *m» tons acranpanylng
derts am normally ontHacj to an aompuon o* Jioo. Duty b nomafly a Batrateof 1 0% on tie list
tiooo stwa BKampOun. B «ia **a or goods dadarad h Item U EXCffiDS Ji^oo PSfl
PERSON. thenHBlAaartdastsefaw and anew price paid hUS, oBianrur, far gats, fair mlalval-
va. Pleas* dosn*e al artldos by Ineir cgmmon namea and material. For axampteMAhfSWDOL
KNFT SWEATER; DIAMOND AND GOLD fllNG; ate. Abo, please ha«» Bl yol* wcolols ready to
present to Ihe Qawms oftcar. Irequeated.Ttita wtt hn)p totecnafaiha Inapedfcn pracaa*.
O»ft«Bfla«. USKHWOSS can be doBned as articles for Ufa, br sotefflng onJara, or otfmr
300* not con»«5«rcd persona/ alfaosodha ibmier.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT WHAT MUST BE
REPORTED OR DECLARED ASK A CUSTOMS OFFICER
DESCRIPTION OF AFfDCtciS VALUE CUSTOMS USE
rtJCT/navOTreutfiusrfonc/TYna-fivmSDSJW
\\
^\ Ci
•J.-.:r~ -' '.-^^ ':? •^-^'""•r-.k.-,1 :':i':«;---'r.i' ':.i::: :::=
•':".~V- S-."':i-.i:;L:S?'" •:'!'"-. Ui^sl:.-:'••;."?••• 5 ; •.--"iJ'V1 •' *;
TOTAL(>
^
Papuwa* BoOuJJon Afl NoMo: T(l«rtCTmnltancwhutoJ on nb tarn to nwM B mriy mil mo CuHnmi, A(r
wd lo atev UB D D0ura and n*>a ISo iloht omxrt o< duy «rd
TTm isttnaM avDragB tiuitftn acmdaied wth Hi eotnOon ef Infommoon U 5 irtnum p«r raopomtoii er n»-
ccfdompof a«p«rtdlriB en nadduaf onjiwanog. Darmonti uMxnuJuu no majracy d Ml bunion eannuB
Mia mgsBitkn tor twdidng hb bwfan itoild be dlraa«« lo OS. Qnem Snnfc», Potan«o* Maraaomort
3 ^MR,^SrP^,^EJLf^TRANT ^ SOR-TAN7 D5S ETAT4JNiS. OU LES PERSONNES EXPEDlANT OU ENVOYANT PAS IA POST6 OU R5CEVANT UNE
• MONNAIE OU TOUTAUTREJNSTRUMENT MONgTAIRE (51AGISANTAU NQM OS QUELQUTJN D'AUTRE. COMPLETEZAUSSI LA 11 ame PARTIE O-DE^OUS)
1. NOM: (nam dei famille,
famille, prinom
prinorn at
et dauxfeme
deuxttmp pr&iom)
pr&om) J " S, NUMERO D'IDENTIFICATION (valr InsWCfion) 13. DATE DE NAISSANCE (m*t.jaa, annta)
r
8. DATE DU VISA DELIVRE PAR L£S 9. UEU DE DELlVRANCE DU VISA DES ETATS-UNIS 10. NO D'ETRANGER IMMIGRANT
11. 31 LA MONNAIE OU PS UNSTRUMENT MONETAITE EST ACCOMPAGNE PAR LA PERSONNE, COMPLETED 11 (a) 00 (b)
A. EXPORTS DES ETATS-UNIS ~ B. IMPORTS OES ETATS-UNIS
Dspart da: (pan ou Arrives ^; (villelpays Atranger) Depart de (ymeSpays Gran Arrived ^ CV^JB des £tat$-Unis)
12. SI LA MONNAIE OU INSTRUMENT MONETAIRE EST ACCOMPAGNE PAR LA PERSONNE, COMPLETEZ 12a OU 12b
12a. DATE DE L'ENVOI DATE DE RECEPTION i2c, METHODS DE TRASNPORT 12d. NOM DU TRANSPORT5UR
llemePARTIE INFORMATION CONCERNANT LA PERSONNE(S) OU LA COMPAGNIE AU NOM DE LAQUELLE L'IMPORTATION OU ^EXPORTATION A ETE FAITE ,
13. NOM (noftt de fairiille, pronom, ou deuxidmg prtnom ou IB nom do la compagnla)
A, Norn da Is monnaic
Sous pelne de parjure, je declare avoir lu la presents declaration et, en toute connaissanca de cause la declare verldique. exacte et
complete.
1B. NOM et TITRE (fcrtre en letl/e d'imprimerie) 20. DATE OE LADECURATION
.S?^*>/
ETAT/ PAYS NUMERO
^?^> rfSttJ
DOE: 07/19/01
POE: Atlanta, Georgia
Class of Entry: B-1 Visitor valid until 11/12/01
Country of Citizenship: Egypt
Country of Residence: Germany
NIXDTVW NO" 4IGRANT INFORMATION SYS-" ^ DATE: 10/13/01
DETAIL VIEW TIME: 11:36:27
LN: ATTA FN: MOHAMED DOB: 09/01/1968 COC: EGYPT
PASSPORT NUMBER 1617066 GENDER: M COR: GERMA
ARRIVAL • ADMN REC: 1 OF 4
EMISSION NUMBER 32421127909
^MISSION CLASS Bl
ADMISSION DATE JUL 19, 2001
ADMITTED TO DATE NOV 12, 2001
PORT OF ENTRY ATLANTA GA 9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
INSPECTOR NUMBER
VISA ISSUE POST
CD
BERLIN
VISA ISSUE DATE MAY 18, 2000
ARRIVAL CARRIER DL DELTA AIR LINES, INC
AIRLINE FLIGHT NUMBER 00109 TRAVEL MODE: AIR
INTENDED STREET ADDRESS 401A GREENSWARD 204
INTENDED CITY ADDRESS DEL RAY BCH STATE: FLORIDA
MICROFILM NUMBER
DEPARTURE ACTUAL DEPARTURE CARRIER :
DEPARTURE DATE : ACTUAL DEPARTURE FLIGHT #:
PORT OF DEPARTURE : SCREEN HELP:
PF1=NEXT PAGE PF2=PRIOR PAGE PF4=RETURN PF5=HELP PF6=MAIN MENU
PF7=FIRST PAGE PF8=LAST PAGE PF10=INQUIRY
41900022 FIRST PAGE DISPLAYED
NIXDTVW NO" MIGRANT INFORMATION SYSr DATE: 10/13/01
DETAIL VIEW TIME: 11:36:37
LN: ATTA FN: MOHAMED DOB: 09/01/1968 COG: EGYPT
PASSPORT NUMBER 1617066 GENDER: M COR; GERMA
ARRIVAL ADMN REC: 2 OF 4
ADMISSION NUMBER 10847166009
MISSION CLASS B2 MISC
ADMISSION DATE JAN 10, 2001
ADMITTED TO DATE JUL 09, 2001
PORT OF ENTRY MIAMI FL
INSPECTOR NUMBER 1955
VISA ISSUE POST BERLIN
VISA ISSUE DATE MAY 18, 2000
ARRIVAL CARRIER
AIRLINE FLIGHT NUMBER TRAVEL MODE: AIR
INTENDED STREET ADDRESS 10001 W ATLANTIC BL
INTENDED CITY ADDRESS CORAL SPRINGS STATE:
MICROFILM NUMBER
DEPARTURE ACTUAL DEPARTURE CARRIER : AR
DEPARTURE DATE : JUL 07, 2001 ACTUAL DEPARTURE FLIGHT #: 117
PORT OF DEPARTURE : MIAMI FL SCREEN HELP:
PF1=NEXT PAGE PF2=PRIOR PAGE PF4=RETURN PF5=HELP PF6=MAIN MENU
PF7=FIRST PAGE PF8=LAST PAGE PF10=INQUIRY
NIXLTVW NO" MIGRANT INFORMATION SYS~ DATE: 10/13/01
DETAIL VIEW TIME: 11:36:40
LN: ATTA FN: MOHAMED DOB: 09/01/1968 COC: EGYPT
PASSPORT NUMBER 1617066 GENDER: M COR: GERMA
ARRIVAL ADMN REC: 3 OF
OMISSION NUMBER 68653985708
MISSION CLASS B2
ADMISSION DATE JAN 10, 2001
ADMITTED TO DATE SEP 08, 2001
PORT OF ENTRY MIAMI FL.....-• •••-" 9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
INSPECTOR NUMBER
VISA ISSUE POST BERLIN
VISA ISSUE DATE MAY 18, 2000
ARRIVAL CARRIER AA AMERICAN AIRLINES
AIRLINE FLIGHT NUMBER 00069 TRAVEL MODE: AIR
INTENDED STREET ADDRESS 516 W LAUREL RD
INTENDED CITY ADDRESS NOKOMIS STATE: FLORIDA
MICROFILM NUMBER
DEPARTURE ACTUAL DEPARTURE CARRIER :
DEPARTURE DATE : ACTUAL DEPARTURE FLIGHT ft:
PORT OF DEPARTURE : SCREEN HELP:
PF1=NEXT PAGE PF2=PRIOR PAGE PF4=RETURN PF5=HELP PF6=MAIN MENU
PF7=FIRST PAGE PF8=LAST PAGE PF10=INQUIRY
NIXDTVW NO" IIGRANT INFORMATION SYS" DATE: 10/13/01
DETAIL VIEW TIME: 11:36:43
LN: ATTA FN: MOHAMED DOB: 09/01/1968 COC: EGYPT
PASSPORT NUMBER 1617066 GENDER: M COR: GERMA
ARRIVAL ADMN REC: 4 OF 4
EMISSION NUMBER 41033626408
;MISSION CLASS B2
ADMISSION DATE JUN 03, 2000
ADMITTED TO DATE DEC 02, 2000
PORT OF ENTRY NEWARK NJ-- " 9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
INSPECTOR NUMBER
VISA ISSUE POST BERLIN
VISA ISSUE DATE MAY 18, 2000
ARRIVAL CARRIER OK CZECHOSLOVAK AIR
AIRLINE FLIGHT NUMBER 00052 TRAVEL MODE: AIR
INTENDED STREET ADDRESS LEXINGTON HOTEL
INTENDED CITY ADDRESS NEW YORK CITY STATE: NEW YORK
MICROFILM NUMBER
DEPARTURE ACTUAL DEPARTURE CARRIER : IB
DEPARTURE DATE : JAN 04, 2001 ACTUAL DEPARTURE FLIGHT #: 6122
PORT OF DEPARTURE : MIAMI FL SCREEN HELP:
PF1=NEXT PAGE PF2=PRIOR PAGE PF4=RETURN PF5=HELP PF6=MAIN MENU
PF7=FIRST PAGE PF8=LAST PAGE PF10=INQUIRY
App: INS, Cat: bio. Item: bio2/201-300/230 http://leads.ins/cgi-bin/leadr 't; )ispRecord_Body.cgi?JTTF::bio2.230::d_data
Report Narrative:
Report Narrative: Same credit card used by Al-Omari, Abdul Aziz
Fedex records show common address with Al-Omari and Al-Shehri
1.
LAST NAME: Atta| FIRST NAME, MIDDLE: Mohamad
GENDER: _J|DOB (05/28/1 958): 19680901J FOB: p
INTENDED STREET ? W. A t l a n t i c B l v d . , Coral Springs, FL 33071J
A rmoiroc.
App: INS, Cat: bio, Item: bio2/201 -300/230 http://leads.ins/cgi-hin/Ieads" JispRecord_Body.cgi?JTTF::bio2.230::d_data
INTENDED
STREET 401A Greensward 204J .
ADDRESS:
INTENDED INTENDED
CITY Del Ray .Beachj STATE _El
ADDRESS: ADDRESS:
f 1.
Address, City, S !ate: ? W . Atlantic Blvd., Coral Springs, FL 33071J
j 2.
i Address, City, State: 3389 Sheridan S t . , Hollywood, FL 33021-3608J
API DATA
INDICATOR C CONFIRMED
AIRLINE CODE DL DELTA AIR LINES INC.
FLIGHT NUMBER 109
ARRIVAL LOCATION ATL WILLIAM B HARTSFIELD
DEPARTURE LOCATION MAD MADRID, BARAJAS
TRANSMITTED BY DELTAMATI DELTA AIRLINES
INBOUND/OUTBOUND INBOUND
ADMISSION NUMBER
ADMISSION CLASS 41033626408 ADMN REC: 4 °^
B2
ADMISSION DATE JUN 03, 2000
ADMITTED TO DATE
PORT OF ENTRY LaW enforcement Privacy
INSPECTOR NUMBER
VISA. ISSUE POST BERLIN
VISA ISSUE DATE MAY 18, 2000
ARRIVAL CARRIER
OK CZECHOSLOVAK AIR
AIRLINE FLIGHT NUMBER 00052
INTENDED STREET ADDRESS LEXINGTON HOTEL TRAVEL MODE: AIR
INTENDED CITY ADDRESS NEW
MICROFILM NUMBER ,Y, v..,- STATE: NEW YORK
DEPARTURE '
DEPARTURE DATE : CARR*E*: IB
PORT OF DEPARTURE : * : 6122
HELP:
''Mi 02, ;:G'J-.V
V.' ' '\ I 1 -> f
••• < / -•L'L'v.1
>'•"? :; RK ^.T
n3^:i
\V>V'^)O0-
\^-
11/01/01 THU 18:H FAII I INS MASSBNA NY E)002
Buffalo District Office \ received information that possibly a male by the name of
Mohammad Atta, born 03-21^-68, may have applied for entry to the
U.S. at the Massena POE. ;
4. A brief description of the incident. The attached memorandum dated 11/01/01 from Sll
Mary Ellen O'Shea advised that a Mohammad ATTA DOB 03/21/68 was inspected at the
Massena, NY POE on 11/26/00. This information came to light yesterday when an intern
working for a pro §e. attorney seeking to file a law suit against the NYS police for
discrimination against North American Indians regarding the issuance of traffic citations
noticed the name Mohammad ATTA on a list of individuals who had appeared in Massena
traffic court. .
Upon receiving this information today Sll O'Shea conducted a search of POE inspections
records. This resulted in an entry being located on a secondary inspection log form I-605
reflecting the admission of Mohammad ATTA and an associate'! Ia
citizen of Pakistan and a Canadian landed immigrant. The nationally code listed for Mr.
ATTA on the I-605 was 80 which represents Canada.
Sll O'Shea contacted the Massena city court to verify th'e-.traffic citation information and a
short time later she received a call from Syracuse FBI ageritl |
I ladvised Sll O'Shea that she was made aware of the
Mohammad ATTA information yesterday and that Sll O'Shea should not conduct any further
investigation. She further advised Sll O'Shea that it was her understanding that the local
news media in Massena was aware of this information.
Buffalo INV contacted the Syracuse FBI who advised that they are attempting to confirm
weather or not a Mohammad ATTA who was inspected at Massena on 11/26/00 was the
same subject involved in the September 11 attacks. The FBI faxed a photo of ATTA to
Massena for viewing by the Judge, NYS trooper and a clerk of the court looking for a positive
ID but this proved inconclusive. The FBI is currently hoping to lift a finger print from the
traffic citation paperwork in hopes of making a conclusive ID. In the meantime they are
conducting surveillance of residences in Cornwall and Alexandria, Ontario obtained from
court records.
It appears ATTA and his associates were referred for secondary inspection on 11/26/00
because ATTA was operating a vehicle with a suspended driver's license. This resulted in
NYS police being called to the POE and the traffic citation being issued. If this subject is the
Mohammad ATTA related to the attacks it would appear he may have presented a false
Canada citizenship card or passport which would explain the nationality code of 80 recorded
on the I-605. Records reflect that both subjects were admitted as B2 visitors.
8. Other law enforcement organizations notified. Have any of these initiated an investigation?
FBI
A.-300-54C-68-321-0
MOHAMED
W ,ATLANTIC
, ATTA BU/D CORAL SPRINGS FL 33071
TYPE LIC: CLASS E OPERATOR DOB: 09/01/6S HT : 508 RACE: 0 SEX: M
CUPJIENT LICENSE ISSUED: 05/02/2001 EXPIRES: 09/01/2007
LICENSE NOT VALID - DO NOT ISSUE 30 DAY PERMIT SOC SEC : 000000000
Page 1
c,
n o - J. i - «.'*;
c
Law tniorcemeni:
NIXMISC . IMMIGRANT INFORMATION SYSTl DATE : 9/12/U1
DETAIL VIEW - MISCELLANEOUS TIME: 2:12:09
SCREEN HELP;
PF4=RETURN PF5=HELP PF6-MAIN MENU PF10=INQUIRY
NIXDTVW NO. IMMIGRANT INFORMATION SYSTl DATE: 9/12/01
DETAIL VIEW TIME: 2:10:52
LN: ATTA " FN: MOHAMED DOB: 09/01/1968 COC: EGYPT
PASSPORT NUMBER 1617066 GENDER: M COR: GERMA
ARRIVAL ADMN REC: 3 OF
""OMISSION NUMBER 68653985708
EMISSION CLASS E2
ADMISSION DATE JAN 10, 2001
ADMITTED TO DATE SEP 08, 2001
PORT OF ENTRY MIAMI FL
INSPECTOR NUMBER
VISA ISSUE POST
cm
BERLIN
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
C.
11 • • ;ot
IR.COSIROOOO.VTINS067e. *087fi494870.
ATN/C |
/ *•• RECORDS ON FILE''FOR *•• DOB/19660901 SEX/M RAC/U
NAM/A.TTA. MOHAMED
Page 1
1AQ RECEIVED: 10/03/01 01:s-;39PM
OR!/ - ELATF05SO ATN/ I J PHN/ L
NAM/ ATTA.MOHAMED \/ 19680901 CUS/ N OFF/ 1009i
PUR/ C POB/ EY SEX/ M
**" BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ""*\E FOLLOWING I.N.S. RECORD APPEARS TO RELATE:
REM/ /
LKA:
INS USE: /
NAILS RECORD ATT09016801 APPEARS TO RELATE TO SUBJECT
LEGAL/ALIAS (L/A): A
SCREEN HELP
<-^~~
) rPNTER
A PD -'iECTOfl
P R, CVV £ D •'J.
If the application is pending with INS, also give the follow ng information. / 1 'ft
a. An you, or »iy other person included in Una appfcafcon. an a#>fccar>« lor ar imrragrant vaa or
at^uatment ol Matin tn parmanrmt nutftonca? X
t>. KM in nwmorani peuoon ever be«n Had lor you. or In any udxx peuon mcJuded n this appheakon?
X
CX. Hav» you, or arty o*W person ncMXM rt *W appXcawn ever tnen arrwued or cannctad o( any crvnnaf
X
d. Have you. or any offw peraon mouMd ft ft* tpphcaton done arv/ma w<W# vtolMad iha u»n« o* Uw
nonmrragrBnt Malus you now hnW1 X
a An* you, or my othet pnr<tori nduded ir tfus appkcakon, now n siftuson or cMpivUtion prnnwdngs''
X
f. Has* you. or »f«Y on* pwsoN uicMMO <n (Tut appUcmon. beeA employed m «w U S wv» IH\ ^nn,««i
a granted an extension or mange of status? X
II you arts««red YES to Question 3(. (jrvo 9*> (ottowing •norvnalion on a separata caper: Namo o» fxyson. name ol emotoyer, aoovoo* o» emptoyw. weekly
inooino,^nd whe*r»r specrfn-jjlry auBmrwod by INS
II you anvnnrad NO ID question 3(, tu*y oaaciibe how you are •jppcrlir^i yowsoM on o Mriw«l« p*l** include Iho source artfl the amcujni »nO basis tor
any itcccne.
5. Signature. RtW mo fnft>rmaeon <Xi o<tf>a/n«i « <n» insvucnoos before c(vnpJo,'irn; Mv.i ^ecbo fffe m/s »op>K»t<Ofi
in mo United Slams
I owUfy urWer ponafly ol oenury under Ihs law* ol (to Uraud SlMet c< America thai Ihis apphcauon. and W ovtdeiica wtx'itiiocl *iu\ -i ak true and u>.ix:i
relaaaa of any nlormalAn (rom my raccrd* when the InvnigrBlion and Naturah/aton Service noons 10 douxfrufw engitaMy ICH tlx> MII«I<I I «f
Pnru Data
ATTA
f you do nor cofn&Ot&t fU Out ffvJ rbr/n. or /ai/ ro iuOm<r '»Qur*tf dOCumorils ftjled m fta 'nsrrucfitvin. tou car>no( b« found
lot the nqtMstod document And m*s appAcafion wi* h«v« fo ti«
Part 6. Signature of person preparing form If other than above. (Sign below)
I riacMre mat I nroparflrj IN* mifil>rjiim\e requed ol i»>e At»i\.-c pe«son <u\i i"»1 aN niintnvitnn nl itf'tcti i fvm1
S<9l»a«ur» P>r>t Yam Name
Firm Nanw
andAddnm
ATTA
Supplement- 1
AtUch to Form 1-539 when more than one perton U included in the petition or application. (List each person
•separately. Do not include the person you named on the form).
Family Given Middle Bate of Birth
Name Name Initial (month/day/year)
Country Social
>\h
A*
Security No.
IF Date of A/rival l-94»
IN 'montti/aeY/Y*ar)
THE Currant Nonimmigranl Expires on
U.S. Status: Imontoidfftptw)
Countiy where Expiration Data
passport issued (month/day/year)
-amity Given Middle Dale of Birth
iSamo Name Initial (month/day/year)
Country Social MI
if Birth Security No
IF Dato of Arrival -94*
IN tmonth<day!ytiae>
THE Current Nonimmigranl Expires on
U.S. Status: (maahtdaY/yoar)
iiountry whore Expiration Date
lassport issuer) (month/day/year)
family Given Middle Date of Birth
Name Name Initial (month/day/year)
Country Social M
if Birth Security No.
IF Date of Arrival 1-94*
IN tmofitttMayiYaart
THE Current Nonimmigrant Expires on
U.S. Status: (montH/tlay/yoHrl
Country where Expiration Dale
passport issued (month/day/year)
Family Given Middle Date o( Birth
Name Name Initial (month/day /year)
Country Social M
n( Birth Security No.
IF Date of Arrival I-(HT
IN (moittttloof/yfian
THE Current Nonimmigrant Expires on
U.S. Status fmonm/rtayoye nr )
Mailing Label-Complete the following mailing label and submit this page with your application
If you are required to submit your original Form 1-94.
I S f L
K u r i l , i S 10 I lt<-v I I I >j[ ,
O
Page: 1 Document Name: untitled r-
o
CURRENT STATEMENT SUMMARY OBSTM01 PAGE: o
o
MARWAN ALSHEHHI OR OF: o
MOHAMED ATTA o
LAST STATEMENT BALANCE: 14,448.61
o
516 LAUREL RD W o
NOKOMIS FL 34275-1939
FbKbUNAL BANKEK
CM
-ac
(0
o
CM
_ RESIDENTIAL LEASE
This agreement, made this M day otlui^tA. . 2000, between Steve Kona , hereinafter referred to
as the LANDLORD, through its agent and MobamedI At$» and Alshehhi Marwan , hereinafter referred to as the
TENANT, concerning the lease of the following described property: 516 W. Laurel Rd. , Venice, FL 34275 is agreed to
by and shall bind the TENANT, its heirs, estate, or legally appointed representatives. TENANT as herein used shall
include-all persons to whom this property is teased. LANDLORD as herein used shall include the owner(s) of the
premises, its. heirs, assigns or representatives and/or any agent(s) designated by the owner(s).
TERM OF LEASED July 13, 2000 to January 14, 2001. If for any reason LANDLORD cannot deliver possession of the
premises to TENANT by the beginning date, the beginning date may be extended up to 30 days or lease voided at
LANDLORD'S option without LANDLORD being liable for any expenses caused by such delay or termination.
OCCUPANTS: Only the following individuals shall occupy the premises unless written consent of the LANDLORD is
obtained: Mohamed Atta, Alshehhi Marwan,, , . A reasonable number of guests may occupy the premises without
prior written consent if stay is limited to 72 hours.
PRORATED RENT: TENANT agrees to pay the sum of N/A as prorated rent for the period N/A to N/A.
ADVANCE RENT: TENANT agrees to pay the sum of $550.00 as advance rent representing payment for the last month
of lease term or any renewal.
RENT: TENANT agrees to pay the monthly rent amount of $550.00 plus any applicable sales tax as rent on the 13th day
of each month in advance without demand at THE RENTAL COMPANY OF VENICE, INC., 236 Tampa Ave.W.
Venice, FL 34285 Phone number (941) 484-7644. Emergency number (941) 484-7644. Rent must be received by
LANDLORD or its designated agent on or before the due date. A late fee of 5% plus n/a per day thereafter shall be due
as additional rent if TENANT fails to make rent payments on or before the 17th day of each month. Cash payments are
—cepted. If TENANT'S check is dishonored, all future payments must be made by money order or cashier's check;
honored checks will be subject to the greater of 5% of the check amount or a $30.00 charge as additional rent. If
.NDLORD has actual knowledge that there are insufficient funds to cover a check, rent will be considered unpaid,
LANDLORD may serve TENANT with a Three Day Notice and will not be required to deposit the check. Third party
checks are not permitted. Time is of the essence. The imposition of late fees and/or dishonored check charges is not a
substitution or waiver of available Florida law remedies. If rent is not received by the 13th day of each month, LAND-
LORD may serve a Three Day Notice on the next day or any day thereafter as allowed by law. All signatories to this
lease are jointly and severally responsible for the faithful performance of this lease. All payments made shall first be
applied to any outstanding balances of any kind including late charges and/or any other charges due under this lease.
All notices by TENANT to LANDLORD shall be sent to LANDLORD'S address above by certified mail.
PETS: TENANT shall not keep any animal or pet in or around the rental premises without LANDLORD'S prior written
approval and a PET ADDENDUM signed by all parties.
SECURITY DEPOSIT: TENANT agrees to pay LANDLORD the sum of $550.00, as security for faithful performance by
TENANT of all terms, covenants and conditions of this lease. This deposit may be applied by the LANDLORD for any
monies owed by TENANT under the lease or Florida law, physical damages to the premises, costs, and attorney's fees
associated with TENANT'S failure to fulfill the terms of the lease. TENANT cannot dictate that this deposit be used for
any rent due. If TENANT breaches the lease by abandoning, surrendering or being evicted from the rental premises prior
to the lease expiration date (or the expiration of any extension), the deposit will be forfeited as special liquidated damag-
es to cover the costs of reletting the rental premises. TENANT will still be responsible for unpaid rent, physical damages,
future rent due, attorney's fees, costs and any other amounts due under the terms of the tenancy or Florida law. The
security deposit (and advance rent, if applicable) will be held in the following manner: Deposited in a separate non
interest bearing account with Community National Bank Of Sarasota, 270 S. Tamiami Trail, Venice, Fl 34285.
Florida statutory law, 83.49(3) provides:
(3)(a) Upon the vacating of the premises for termination of the lease, the LANDLORD shall have 15 days to return the security
deposit together with interest if otherwise required, or in which to give the TENANT written notice by certified mail to the TENANT
last known mailing address of his intention to impose.a claim on the deposit, and the reason for imposing the claim. The notice shall
-ain a statement in substantially the following form: This is a notice of my intention to impose a claim for damages in the amount
/: upon your security deposit, due to ~=z. It is sent to you as required by s. 83.49(3), Florida Statutes. You are hereby notified
., idt you must object in writing to this deduction from your security deposit within 15 days from the time you receive this notice or I will
be authorized to deduct my claim from your security deposit. Your objection must be sent to (landlord's address). If the LANDLORD
fails to give the required notice within the 15-day period, he forfeits his right to impose a claim upon the security deposit.
(b) Unless the TENANT objects to the imposition of the landlord's claim or the amount thereof within 15 days after receipt of the
landlord's notice of intention to impose a claim, the LANDLORD may then deduct the amount of his claim and shall remit the balance
a... ,. .
E ARABE D'ECYPTE
MIN1STERE DE L'INTERIEUR
ADMINISTRATION DES PASSEPORTS,
tA*. t .<* DE L'IMMIG RATION ET
DE LA NATIONALITE.
xpvrc U • - ? • -
Profession .
Signes Particuliers
000000040
REQ #20-1 and 2
1MM1UKAMT iNfUKMAl-LUJN
UA'l'fc : JLU/ J--5/ ui.
NIXDTVW
DETAIL VIEW TIME: 11:36:27
MOHAMED DOB: 09/01/") 6 8 COC: EGYPT
.LN: ATTA GENDER: M ' COR: GERMA
PASSPORT NUMBER ADMN REC; 1 OF
ARRIVAL
" iISSION NUMBER 32421127909
ISSION CLASS Bl
ADMISSION DATE JUL 19, 2001
ADMITTED TO DATE NOV 12, 2001
PORT OF ENTRY ATLANTA GA 9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
INSPECTOR NUMBER
VISA ISSUE POST BERLIN
VISA ISSUE DATE MAY 18, 2000
DL DELTA AIR LINES, INC
ARRIVAL CARRIER TRAVEL MODE: AIR
AIRLINE FLIGHT NUMBER 00109
INTENDED STREET ADDRESS 401A GREENSWARD 204 STATE: FLORIDA
INTENDED CITY ADDRESS DEL RAY BCH
MICROFILM NUMBER ACTUAL DEPARTURE CARRIER :
DEPARTURE ACTUAL DEPARTURE FLIGHT #:
DEPARTURE DATE :
PORT OF DEPARTURE : PF4=RETURN PF5=HELP PF6=MAIN MENU
PF1-NEXT PAGE PF2-PRIOR PAGE
PF7=FIRST PAGE PF8=LAST PAGE PF10=INQUIRY
NI900022 FIRST PAGE DISPLAYED
000000036
REQ #20-1 and 2
TID=J7J5
API DATA
INDICATOR C CONFIRMED
AIRLINE CODE DL DELTA AIR LINES INC.
FLIGHT NUMBER 109
ARRIVAL LOCATION ATL WILLIAM B HARTSFIELD
DEPARTURE LOCATION MAD MAORID, BARAJAS
TRANSMITTED BY DELTAMATI DELTA AIRLINES
INBOUND/OUTBOUND INBOUND
Admission Number
en
] t J^ I I I I
Immigration and 1QH .
Naturalization Service — ATI. I 1
ADMITTED
1-94
Arrival Record
JUL 1 3 W\
( Family Name
Ar'r.A
2. First (Given) Name
as > \ •
t
3. Brfth D»tefl5iy/Mo;Yr)
O, / |0,9 !,<,#,
4. Country of Citizenship 5. Sex (M»le or Femik)
5.6.V.P.T.
6. Passport Number
. n/4./.^.
7, Airline and Flight Number
/ t / 4 , D / ? , f ,D, , , ,
0. City Where Visa Was Issued . Due Issued (Day/Mo/Yr)
, .A,C/f. L
'OS -'
- Primer nombre
t i l l , ,
' Kccha dc nac idlai'mci/anni
i
•*• Cuidadanla ^ S C X O (Male nr' Female)
Afl A / /C"
i / IL/T i f_- i ^— ' i
i i
t1 No dc pasaporte '• Acrolinca y No dc vueto
1 i C? i / \ \ \f~j \h \ i i 1 I 1 1 , I
fc Pak dondc Ud. vive ^ Puerto dc cmharquc
£,£",&, A A. /I/, V , , , 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1
la dc cnnsi^n dc idli ' mcs'ano)
1
It! Ciudad dc cmisnin dc visa hcc
1
1- Direcciiin en E.U. (No y calle)
1 00
1 O
000000034
REQ #20-1 and 2
lO
is)
o
i Aviso - Si la persona que no es inmigrante acepta empleo sin autorizacidn esta1
sujeta a deportacidn.
Nota importante- Retenga Ud. estc permiso quedebe presenlar a l s a l i r d e E.U. /^/
CD 1 17
Ul\ i /
Dale:
Carrier:
MIAMI
Flight A/Ship Name:
O
O
O
o
o
o
o
U)
U1
5U U-
FL
TO:
(JSlA/S TSC
851182
CO 703.1192
Office of the Commissioner 425 I Street NW
Washington, DC 20536
MAR I 8 2002
1. A description of Mohammed Atta's admission into the United States through Miami
International Airport on January 10,2001.
Answer: Given the sheer volume of inspections, the amount of time that has passed, and the fact
that the inspection did not result in the initiation of removal proceedings, the Inspectors who
spoke to Mohammed Atta on January 10, 2001, do not remember the specific inspection. The
only record that exists of the inspection are the Inspectors' notes, which are extremely limited
and not comprehensive. A copy of the notes is attached for your review. According to that
record, Mohammed Atta arrived at Miami International Airport via American Airlines flight 69
from Madrid. Upon inspection, Atta presented Egyptian passport number 1617066. The notes
from the primary Inspector indicate that Atta had in his possession a Form 1-20, which is the
form issued to foreign students by schools authorized to accept such students. They also reflect
that Atta had indicated to the Inspector that he had been attending flight school for five or six
months. Current rules permit nonimmigrants with change of status applications pending to
attend school while awaiting adjudication of the application. The INS plans to change these
regulations to prohibit an alien from attending school until after the change of status application
is approved. Also, as part of the overall effort to reduce processing times, we plan to reduce to
less than 30 days the average processing time for applications to change status from visitor to
student.
The Honorable George W. Gekas
Page2
In light of the information given to the primary Inspector, and the fact that Atta was carrying an
unexpired B-l/B-2 visa, Atta was referred to secondary inspection to determine admissibility.
The notes from the secondary inspection indicate that a query to the CLAIMS system (INS'
benefits processing database) was made, which confirmed that Atta had previously submitted an
application to change status to M-l. The notes also indicate that no grounds for removal were
found.
While the reasoning behind the ultimate decision to admit Atta under the B-2 classification is not
clear from the record, it is clear that the Inspector made all appropriate queries and encountered
no information indicating that Atta was a terrorist. Upon completion of those queries, Atta was
admitted in visitor's status.
2. Copies of Atta's passport (if you have it) and all supporting documentation that he
submitted to INS Inspections when he arrived at Miami International Airport on
January 10, 2001.
Answer: In light of the vast volume of inspections conducted each day, copies of documents
presented are rarely retained if the INS does not initiate removal proceedings. Atta was
admitted, and therefore such copies were not made. However, as discussed in #1 above,
enclosed is a copy of the record of the Inspectors' notes.
3. An explanation of whether Atta should have been admitted to the United States on
January 10, 2001, along with a description of all grounds on which he may have been
inadmissible on that date.
Answer: An immigration officer has broad discretion to determine the admissibility of aliens
applying for admission to the United States taking into account the documents presented, the
alien's representations, information contained in automated systems, and other factors.
As a general rule, an applicant for admission who is attending flight training full-time is required
to present a student visa, and can be found inadmissible under INA section 212(a)(7)(B)(i)(II) if
the individual is not in possession of an appropriate nonimmigrant visa.
However, admission of a prospective student with a visitor visa is allowed under certain
circumstances. While the regulations do not explicitly address this question, the Inspectors Field
Manual, which contains instructions to field officers, states in part: "For prospective
students...occasionally you may encounter an applicant who, in good faith, presents a B-2 visa
but intends to attend school. Before denying admission, consider all circumstances surrounding
the case, such as the reasons for not getting a student visa abroad, financial ability, and any
possibly fraudulent activity on the part of the alien. If you are satisfied that the alien is otherwise
The Honorable George W. Gekas
Page3
bona fide, defer inspection to allow the alien to obtain an 1-20 and any other documentation and
apply for a visa waiver."
Also, B-2 visitors are permitted to engage in a short course of study incident to their primary
visitor for pleasure purpose. While the current regulations do not explicitly address this
question, the INS plans to propose a change to the regulations on this issue. The Inspectors Field
Manual, states in part: "If otherwise admissible, admit....as B-2...an alien coming primarily for
tourism who also incidentally will engage in a short course of study." As stated in #1 above, the
INS is drafting a change to the regulations and will also change the Inspectors Field Manual to
ensure that an alien in this situation will not be admitted to the United States.
The record indicates that, at the time of the January 10 admission, the Inspector was aware that
Atta had applied for a change of status to M-l student. He also was aware that Atta was not at
that time the subject of any lookout or watch list. The full content of the entire interview with
Atta is not known for the reasons discussed in #1 and #2 above. If Atta's inspection presented
issues that needed additional information or further scrutiny that should have caused the
inspector to defer the inspection or deny admission to Atta. But, we cannot know today all of the
information that was then before the Inspector. Therefore, a fair judgment would be that one
cannot determine in hindsight that the Inspector's decision was not the correct one based on the
information available to him at that time. But we do know that the Inspector conducted a
thorough inspection and had no information that Atta was a potential terrorist. Certainly, Atta
would not have been admitted had such intelligence information been available to the Inspector.
4. A copy of the memorandum referred to in the October 28,2001 Washington Post article
is requested.
I trust this information is useful to you. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to
call me.
Sincerely,
W. Ziglar
COMMISSIONER
Enclosures
Janice Kephart-Roberts
' ' ____—.-_-^-9 /-[_-]_ personal Privacy
From: WINVSECj |
Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2003 10:05 AM
To: JKEPHART-ROBERTS@9-11COMMISSION.GOV
Subject: Immigration & terrorism...more
Unfortunately, much of this article is right on the mark. Unfortunately, what transpired at the time was just part of
the overall ineffective, institutionally mandated lax enforcement focus which is only now beginning to change
slowly, two years after the attacks and billions of dollars later. And, unfortunately, in some instances, much of the
same "leadership" is still in place.
Two years after the attacks on America, the public still doesn't know the truth about terror ringleader Mohamed
Atta's entry into the country.
It was illegal.
Immigration agents shouldn't have admitted the Egyptian national at Miami International Airport on January 10,
2001. Records show he was allowed to enter as a student on an expired tourist visa. The first immigration
inspector at MIA to question Atta recognized these facts and singled him out for further grilling. But after a 30-
minute interview, secondary inspector Robert Wilson gave Atta a big break: He let him through.
The immigration agency, which has been broken into three parts and is now overseen by the Department of
Homeland Security, continues to deny that Atta was improperly admitted. And the Justice Department basically let
the agency off the hook in an investigation last year.
Had inspectors turned away Atta, who piloted the first plane that struck the World Trade Center and was the chief
planner of the attacks, the world might well be profoundly different today. Yet the story hasn't been told in full,
perhaps because it has been obscured by official disavowals and shrouded in the ambiguous complexities of
immigration law. The government is in denial - and that casts a dubious shadow over post-September 11
immigration reforms.
Atta's entry was only one symptom of the immigration authority's lax culture prior to September 11, 2001. Shortly
after the attacks, I wrote a series titled "Admitting Terror" that documented how Immigration and Naturalization
Service officials at MIA consistently broke laws and failed to properly inspect foreign travelers, including other
suspected terrorists. One finding was a 1999 directive issued by assistant INS port director Henry Aponte about
people who overstay their visas, called "7A's" in bureaucratic parlance: "Please stay away from 7A cases!!!!"
Aponte wrote. "Case closed!!" Aponte's exclamatory order contradicted immigration law, which held that overstays
- like Mohamed Atta and fellow September 11 conspirator Marwan al-Shehhi -- lose their visas.
The INS had fallen prey to political pressure that stemmed from huge lobbying campaigns by the airline and travel
industries to facilitate speedy international air travel at the expense of proper enforcement. "Until 9/11 nobody
took immigration security all that seriously," says Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration
Studies in Washington, D.C., a conservative group that pushes for reduced immigration levels. "It was seen more
as an obstacle or irritant than a security tool, and I'm afraid that two years later a lot of political forces that
opposed border enforcement are starting to creep back, Things have changed some, but not nearly enough."
One might think that September 11 would have led to an overhaul of the agency's leadership. Didn't happen.
Take Aponte, for example. The official who ordered his underlings to ignore the law is still in power. How about
Ramon Rosario, the supervisor on the night of Atta's January 2001 entry? He's still a supervisor. Robert Wilson,
the inspector who stamped Atta's visa on January 10, is no longer an inspector, though. Rest easy - he's been
9/15/2003
Page 2 of 3
promoted to supervisor. John Bulger, the port director who oversaw the giant mess, is still in a position of power
at MIA as well; he's the interim Miami district director for the new Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services.
The only one drummed out of the agency, it seems, is whistleblower Jos Touron, a dedicated agent and union
leader who did his best to expose the problems. Touron is appealing his termination, which came after he refused
to escort an INS prisoner at the airport without security measures -- which included handcuffs for the suspect and
back-up officers.
The chief watchdog over the immigration authority is the Justice Department's Office of the Inspector General,
which investigated the Atta and al-Shehhi cases last year. Inspector General Glenn Fine, who headed the federal
probe, had a chance to expose the agency's failure, but his efforts - which involved a team of three federal
lawyers, four special agents, and three program analysts - instead only illustrate the OIG's own ineptitude.
More than likely you never heard about Fine's 188-page report, which received superficial media attention when it
was released May 20, 2002. The report detailed how Atta first entered the country on a tourist visa through
Newark International Airport on June 3, 2000, and was authorized to stay in the U.S. until December 2 of that
year. Within two months Atta was enrolled at flight school in Venice, Florida. Though Fine failed to mention it in
his report, that alone constituted a form of immigration fraud - Atta clearly came here as a student rather than a
tourist. The maneuver allowed him to avoid the U.S. State Department's strictures on student visas. "It was an
outrageous fraud," says Steven Camarota, the Center for Immigration Studies' director of research. "When Atta
got his tourist visa, he implicitly promised he wouldn't be a student, but that's exactly what he did."
On September 9, 2000, Atta applied with the immigration authority to change his status from tourist to student. A
few months later, while the government was still processing his application, he finished flight training. On January
4, 2001, a month after his visa expired, he flew from Miami to Madrid. Six days later he tried to re-enter the
country on the expired tourist visa. When questioned by the primary inspector, Atta said he had applied to be a
student. At secondary inspection, Wilson allowed Atta into the country for an additional eight months, until
September 10, 2001, one day before the attack. (Wilson wasn't named in the report; I learned of his identity
through confidential sources at the immigration authority. Immigration spokeswoman Barbara Gonzalez deferred
to the OIG report when asked about Atta.)
Although Fine didn't endorse Wilson's action, neither did he condemn it. First, Fine determined that Atta wasn't an
overstay. He asserted that since Atta had applied for a student visa, he could lawfully stay in the country while
immigration officials processed it. That is true, but as soon as he left the country, Atta abandoned that application,
says veteran immigration attorney Robert Gard, who has written legal articles about the Atta entry at MIA. Thus
the overstay was applicable in Atta's case. "Anytime you overstay, even by one day, your visa is revoked and you
have to apply for a new visa in your home country," Gard says. "And Atta overstayed."
Though Fine, who didn't return calls to New Times, admitted that Atta had abandoned his application, he decided
the tourist visa was still good. Even then, Fine found that Atta shouldn't have been allowed into the country, since
he had conceded that he was entering as a student on a tourist visa.
But Wilson, who told investigators he had no memory of his encounter with Atta, said that he must have thought
the Egyptian was going to be a "part-time" student and that his schooling would be incidental to his pursuit of
"pleasure" in the United States. Rather than dismiss this excuse as silly and insignificant speculation, Fine latched
onto it: "If the inspector believed that Atta was not intending to attend school full-time ... admitting Atta as a
[tourist] would have been appropriate," he wrote.
Gard, a former Chicago chapter president of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, says that in his 26
years of practicing immigration law he has never heard that distinction. "I don't buy that a part-time student can
come here under a visitor's visa," he says. "Even if he enrolled in a school for just one course, that's a violation of
a tourist visa."
In the end, Fine lamely ducked the issue. "We were unable to reach any definitive conclusion whether Atta's
admission in January 2001 was improper, given the limited record relating to the admission and the inspector's
inability to remember the specifics of what was said at the time," Fine wrote.
So the Justice Department spared the INS accountability for allowing Atta into the country. Worse, by the time the
information filtered to the public via the Associated Press and television news, that point had somehow changed.
The AP story stated that the report "does not suggest... the agency acted improperly in allowing [Atta] to enter the
country three times."
9/15/2003
Page 3 of 3
Utter nonsense. Though it failed to reach a conclusion, the DIG strongly suggested the agency acted improperly.
But such misinformation isn't surprising when you consider the Justice Department press release that
accompanied the report. To wit: "With regard to Atta's and al-Shehhi's entries into the United States, the DIG
concluded that the evidence does not show that the inspectors who admitted them violated INS policies and
practices."
It's a lovely way to do business. First the OIG finds numerous problems with Atta's entry into the United States,
but refuses to say it was wrong. Then the press release falsely indicates that there were no problems at all.
Not everyone has been fooled. Camarota recently completed a study that showed that 22 of 48 al Qaeda
terrorists who have entered the United States during the past decade did so after violating immigration laws. Atta
is on his list. "The sloppy and lax nature of our immigration system played a central role in what happened on
September 11," Camarota says. "I think most Americans would be outraged if they knew how sloppy that agency
had become."
Immigration experts tend to agree that enforcement is at least slightly better today than it was two years ago.
Though it's already well behind schedule, the agency is implementing a foreign-student tracking system. And
Congress last year repealed a horrendous law that required the immigration authority to process foreign visitors
within 45 minutes of arrival. But the same old dubious district leadership remains in place in South Florida, and
overall funding levels, at six billion dollars a year, are still far too low to be truly effective. With our national
treasury flowing into Iraq, that's not likely to change any time soon.
One mantra repeated by immigration officials is that no one wants to be the inspector who allows in the next
Mohamed Atta. But why not? That person might, like Wilson, get a promotion out of the deal.
9/15/2003
U .S. ISCplU
(J ,ij. Department of UJustice
L1UC11L Ul / /< -.. ..' ,' f
U3LIUC ; ,' _. ,X ' ' • ' -J ' ^' , ^ , / ' - ^.' __
( S
V . v ^ : - ;^^.^v^^•^^^^g^^^^?^^?^^^S^^
Ri'CEIlT MAIK.'K • . /
-
SRC-Ctl-.-;7f-50351 .• / • --"
APPLI^TION^.-fo'^EXT^TJ/CHANGS^^fONIXMrGF-M-iT STATUS
IKIORI i Y n ITK,X / , .• • , .. .
September'2 2., 200( •' •'/, './- ••'/ /••/
' ATTA,',.VIOH/KVD- ..-' ^ / • • '/ ••/''•'/' _/, .-' ._
NOntE'llATL .PK.E .' / '
July 17, 2001. i' of i/' X • •' V
••/.-/ " / - x
MOHAMED ATTA . '_ •• y ' •' •' ' /. /' •'^ / ' Notice''Type:' ,• AgprovalxNopffce
516 W LAUREL RD.'\/''/•.' /'/'/'" Sx^- '
' '
'NOKOMIS FL 34275 .'x .•••/'•' '///' 's'- •
' ' ..Valid^f Eom'i2'/'02/20-o'o/to /10/01/2001
, • PLEASE TEAR OFF I'ORM t'yi PRIN'fyi BELOW AVO STAPLE TO ORKJI^IL |.W"|F AVA'ILABl E
Form!797A(Rev--09/p7/B3)!^. '
Additional Information
1-94 ATTACHMENT.
The section of this notice below the perforation u a replacement Form 1-94. After you have used this form to complete any necessary
Form 1-9. or other required documentation, tear off the bottom portion and give it to the alien. When you are looking at the front of the
tear off, the alien should keep the right portion with hi* or her original Form 1-94 and passport, tf any. as evidence of the changes
made to his or her status. A copy of it should be submitted with any subsequent application or petition.
Tke smaller portion on the left of the tear off is for tlie alien to keep as a permanent record of this action. He or she should be
•dvised to not keep this stub with his or her Form 1-94. If he or she should ever lose the replacement Form 1-94-, a copy of tkis stub
should be submitted with the application for a new replacement Form 1*94.
B-1B230
REQ #20-1 and 2
CO
I
U.S. Department of Justice 0.0. OPFfli
3
to INS, Texas Service Center
PO Box85I4R8
Mesquite. Texas 75185-1488
10
is)
O
I
HOHRHED RTTfl
a 51B U LflUREL RD
NOKOHIS FL 34275-
IS)
i,,i,.i.i,i,,,i,i,i,,i.i,,i,,.m,i,,,..m,
O
o
o
o
o
o
o
H
10
o
Important Document Information o
o
o
o
o
o
The Immigration and Naturalization Service has
changed the policy requiring submission of original documents
or certified copies of documents with applications and petitions.
O»
MOHAMEDATTA
010004-0167
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
OIG004-0168
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
Secondary Inspector
"I Interviewed by SA| | andl Ion December 20,
\1 at Miami International Airport
I [recalled ATTA being referred to Hard Secondary as a possible
overstay on a B-1/B-2 tourist visa.
OIO004-0189
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
OIGOO4-0170
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
O1G004-0171
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
i
• Was interviewed as a witness (no warnings or placed under oath)
* Was shown copy of 1-94 with admission # 68653985708
| has never seen this 1-94 until now
• Upon entry into U.S., INS stamps top & bottom portion of 1-94 and passport
• Top portion remains with INS, bottom portion goes with passenger
• Top portion is sent to service center for data entry
• B-l stamp on 1-94 - There is no B-l stamp being used at deferred inspection.
Dates change according to the persons circumstances - normally write in B-l and
the date
• The B- 1 stamp was probably put on the 1-94 at MIA - All passengers arriving at
MIA on a particular date would have the same date on his/her documents (i.e. Feb
9, 2001 w/B-1 or B-2 stamp). This is easier for processing at MIA with date
stamp.
• If an 1-94 has any changes, including the crossing out of information, the IIs are
authorized to issue a new 1-94 - recommended to avoid any confusion with old
and new entries
• Upon issuing a new 1-94, comments are made on the back stating the reason for
any changes and issuance of new 1-94
• If Atta had come to deferred inspection on May 2, 2001 with a Feb 9, 2001 entry
date, he would have been in overstay status. Investigations would have been
notified and Atta would have been arrested and processed. Don't know if Atta
made any changes to this 1-94 before arriving at deferred inspection.
O1G004-0178
• Would not have written on old 1-94 - would cause confusion - instead issued Atta
a new 1-94
• Never seen IIs write the date like this one 09 July 01 - Most Us normally write
the month, day, year
• If Atta presented this 1-94 with a date of 09 July 0 1 , she would not have issued
him a new one
• If Atta had come to deferred inspection with a B 1 and date of Feb 9, 2001 , he
would have been an overstay and INS Investigations would also have been
notified
• In regard to Atta' s 1-94, he only wanted to get eight months for his friend. I
issued him a new 1-94 because the 1-94 he presented clearly shows until
September 2001, which was beyond a B-2 status. This 1-94 appears to be
fraudulent | "jused a "loop" to review the 1-94 and concluded that some
of the letters in "ADMITTED" were slanted and not aligned properly and some
letters were not evenly spaced).
• She stapled the old 1-94 to the new 1-94 issued to Atta and placed them in abox,
which was sent to UNTBAND fqr data entry into NITS
• She did not write or stamp any information on the old 1-94
• IIs should issue a new 1-94, instead of crossing out and making corrections
OIG004-0179
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
This would be the correct date if Atta entered on January 10, 2001 with a B-2
visa
B-l visas for business purposes, can be issued up to one year with a supervisors
approval - B-ls can also be issued for two weeks or one month depending on the
passengers circumstances
I [did not know why the NIIS report shows a date of September 8, 2001
The top portion of the 1-94 goes to the contractor for data entry, with the bottom
portion going to the passenger
In regard to making changes and comments on the 1-94, there are no comments
made on the Departure portion of the 1-94. However, comments can be made
regarding parolees, asylum applicants, adverse actions, put A# on 1-94 etc.
The top portion of the 1-94 is to filled out if the computer goes down and manual
entries have to be made
In looking at the copy of the I-94J | said he could not tell if the document
was a counterfeit. He needs to see the original. However, the wording on the
admission stamp appear to be spelled correctly
| [docs not recall making any changes / notations on Atta's 1-94. He was
not sure if the handwriting was his. He never seen or heard of any INS directive
about writing over stamps:
In regard to a passport entry,1 the passport would normally be stamped
with the classification and not the date. The INS policy prefers Us to stamp and
not write dates hi the passport.
B-l visas - have seen more than three months issued - if no problems, a GS-07,
08, 11, can authorize without a supervisors approval
B-2 visas - more than six months normally requires a supervisors approval
Depends on superiors and passenger flow in secondary - sometimes a supervisor
wants to see every case and on some days does not "Speed is the name of the
Game"
If the supervisors in secondary are not expediting passengers in a timely manner,
the supervisor must write a memo or cc-mail the Port Director, which in turn
effects the IIs Performance Evaluation Report- mostly internal
The Airlines are also responsible for making sure the 1-94's are filled out
correctly. There are Passenger Processing Representatives who assist the
passengers with filling out the I-94s.
There is nothing INS can do to prevent an alien from crossing out and making
changes to an 1-94. Its not uncommon for aliens to purchase stamps and make
changes
Customs Declaration also shows the intent or classification in which a passenger
is intending to enter the U.S.
No additional information
010004-0180
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
J
Was issued a Ralkines warning and placed under oath
Was shown a COPY of 1-94 with admission # 68653985708
After reviewing I-94\d the handwriting / date was not his
He doesn't recall placing a B-l stamp in Atta's passport. However, he does own
a B-l date stamp, which he purchased on his own
voluntarily turned his B-l stamp over to the DIG
also made an impression with his B-l stamp on a blank 1-94
He has used his B-l stamp until three months ago
In looking at the 1-94.1 ~|said the date appears to be a 9 or possibly a 7 - the
middle portion looks like a H pr 18, and 01 for the year
| formally writes his dates ^European and South American style because
most of the passengers come fromEurope and South America and it's easier for
the passenger's to understand the date - He would write his dates as follows: 09
JulOl
1 Ivohintarily provided the QIG with a writing sample on a blank 1-94 - He
wrote the following: 09 Jul 2001 _
The admission stamp on the 1-94, #| [vvasV ^ld number.
He was recently issued a new admission stamp with A H
B-l visas for business purposes, can be issued up to one year with a supervisors
approval depending on tune needed and expiration date on the passport
| Isaid he normally issues a B-l for 30 days if passengers have in the past
continuously entered the U.S. back to back on a B-2 six month visa
Iocs not like giving six months on a B-l visa
would issue a B-l visa and tell the person to file for an extension (1-539
process)
If the person needed more than six months on a B-l visa, can also refer to
secondary for further review and supervisor approval, especially if the passenger
is looking to attend some form of training. Most cases involve training for
companies while in the U.S.
Under B-l visas, domestic servants normally request a one-year status. These
passengers are sent to secondary for further review an supervisor approval
| [said his stamps look alike and on several occasions placed the wrong
stamp on the 1-94 - Had to cross out and make handwritten changes to the 1-94
B-2s are issued for up to six months. If more time is needed, normally tell
passenger to file for an extension
OIG004-0181
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
After filing for an extension, the passenger will receive notice in the mail (1-797)
and a approval letter from INS with the expiration date
I bid not know why the NHS report shows a date of September 8, 2001
If Atta entered on January 10, 2001, a six-month visa would be issued until July
9,2001
The top portion of the 1-94 goes to the contractor at the Nebraska Service Center
for data entry, with the bottom portion going to the passenger
Upon departing the U.S, the passengers turn the bottom portion (Departure
Record) over to the airlines
The airlines in turn hands over the I-94's to INS - INS sends to service center for
data entry into NIIS
In regard to Customs Declarations - Us are only concerned with the form being
filled out correctly, and the signature on the Customs form matches with the
signature on the passport
I baid he does not recall placing a B-l date stamp in Atta's passport or
issuing him a 30 day B-l visa
| [also said the handwriting on the 1-94 was not his - nor does he know
whose handwriting appears on the 1-94
No additional information
O1G004-0182
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
OIG004-0186
UJ: ATTA PN: MOHAMED DOB: 09/01/13S8 COC: EGYPT
ADMISSION NUMBER 10847166009
CLASSIFICATION DATE JAN 10, 2001
EXTENDED ADMITTED TO DATE
ITINERARY 2001158003 194 ISSUED AT MIA 1903 194 WAS ISS IN ER
ITINERARY (CON'T) ROR NEW I 94
BOND FLAG
NOTATIONS
CONTROL OFFICE
ADJUST TO PERM RESIDENT
ALIEN NUMBER
SCREEN HELP:
PF4-RETURN PF5=HELP PFS=MAIN MENU PF10=INQUIRY
OIG004-0187
FB'd
80:iT 18SK-ZZ-J.3Q
NIXDTVW ""ON-IMMIGRANT INFORMATION DATE: 9/17/01
DETAIL VIEW TIME: 8:35:37
LN: ATTA FN: MOHAMED DOB: 09/01/1968 COC: EGYPT
PASSPORT NUMBER 1617066 GENDER: M COR: GERMA
VAL ADMN REC: 3 OF
.SSION NUMBER 68653985708
H^-lISSION CLASS B2
ADMISSION DATE JAN 10, 2001
ADMITTED TO DATE SEP 08, 2001
PORT OF ENTRY MI.
INSPECTOR NUMBER
VISA ISSUE POST BERLIN
VISA ISSUE DATE MAY 18, 2000
ARRIVAL CARRIER AA AMERICAN AIRLINES
AIRLINE FLIGHT NUMBER 00069 / TRAVEL MODE: AIR
INTENDED STREET ADDRESS 516 W LAUREL RD
INTENDED CITY ADDRESS NOKOMIS STATE: FLORIDA
MICROFILM NUMBER
DEPARTURE ACTUAL DEPARTURE CARRIER :
DEPARTURE DATE : ACTUAL DEPARTURE FLIGHT #:
PORT OF DEPARTURE : SCREEN HELP:
PF1=NEXT PAGE PF2=PRIOR PAGE PF4=RETURN/ PF5 = HELP PF6=MAIN MENU
PF7-FIRST PAGE PF8=LAST PAGE PF10=INQUIRY
OIG004-0186
UST: ATTA FN: MOHAMED
PASSPORT NUMBER 1617066 GENDER: M COR: GERMA
ARRIVAL ADMN REC; 2 OP
ADMISSION NUMBER ~ 10847166009
ADMISSION CLASS B2 MISC
ADMISSION DATE JAN 10, 2001
ADMITTED TO DATE JUL 09, 2001
PORT OP ENTRY MIAMI FL
INSPECTOR NUMBER 1955
VISA ISSUE POST BERLIN
VISA ISSUE DATE MAY 18. 2000
ARRIVAL CARRIER
AIRLINE FLIGHT NUMBER TRAVEL MODE: AIR
INTENDED STREET ADDRESS 10001 W ATLANTIC BL
INTENDED CITY ADDRESS CORAL SPRINGS STATE:
MICROFILM NUMBER
DEPARTURE ACTUAL DEPARTURE CARRIER : AR
DEPARTURE DATE : JUL 07, 2001 ACTUAL DEPARTURE FLIGHT ft: 117
PORT OF DEPARTURE : MIAMI FL SCREEN HELP:
PFl^NEXT PAGE PF2=PRIOR PAGE PF4=RETURN PF5=HELP PF6=MAIN MENU
PF7-FIRST PAGE PF8-LAST PAGE PF10=INQUIRY
010004-0188
OCT-22-2001 17:06 P. 05
6810-*OOOIO
• bO OR*rrU80T '
J 18. Occupation WP viwvcn
• •*
i
; 2fl.lNS.Filt . ' 21. INS-FCO
! A-
| 22. Nririoij Number 2J. fntfmm Number •
1 ' '
•i
i 24. O Bond 25. (3 Prat(BCX|ve Suideat
OIO004-0190
90'd
p.Z
act' 26 01 12:34p
r.i
Inspections
Miami International Airport
P.O. Box 99-7S95
Miami, Florida 33299-7895
Oa May 2,2001,1 wis detailed to me Miami Deferred Inspection Uoh for one (1) day. During me
day a person by the name of Mohammed Atta/ came to me Miami Deferred Inspection. Sabjecthad
a companion wxm him, and Mr. Atta wanted mformation about hu 1-94. Mr. Atta was admitted for
eight (8) months as a tourist, while his friend was admitted for six (6) months. Mr. Atta wanted to
know "Why hie friend got 6 months as a visitor and he got eight (3) months)? 1 explained to Mir. Atta
, his 1-94 was issued in error, as a tourist he is only entitled to six (6) monms. I spoke to (he
Supetvisof fcppt the issue. I told her I wanted to correct the 1-94 to reflect six (6) months
instead of eight (8) mourns.! Idid not see a problem with me correcting the 1-94. I
conected the 1-94 wittl me same admission date as to the time of entry for six (6) months from the
time of entry and explained to Mr Atta, if he needed more time to stay in tie United States, he would
have to file for an extension.
OK3004-0183
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
26 01
DEFERRED INSPECTION
Please, WRITE YOUR NAME AND NATIONALITY AND
A SEAtUNTILyOtm NAME IS
G/K/L
OIG004-0184
9/11 Lav; Enforcement Privacy
On March 20, 2002, at approximately 1:40 p.m., DQJ/OIG Special Agents (SAs)| land
[ [interviewed Immigration Inspector (tft I at the Immigration & Naturalization
Service (INS) Training area, Miami International Airport (MIA). Also present during the interview was
DQJ Attorney Stephen Fallowfield. The purpose of the interview was to determine the handling and
processing of Mohamed Atta's entry into the United States through MIA on January 10, 2001. Prior to
any questioning, II [was given an administrative warning (Kalkines), OIG Form III-226/3
(Warnings and Assurances to Employee Required to Provide Information), and was subsequently placed
under oath, nl I agreed to being interviewed by the OIG and stated the following:
6 ATTA can file for an M-l visa while residing in the U.S.
o NO 1-20 & M-l visa - options: computer check to verify status (1-539), contact
Supervisor, waiver. Pay fee, Supervisor has final decision
o Appropriate action - never been confronted with such a matter
p Grounds for removal - hard to sayj |said it depends on persons circumstances
(story)
o | Kvas subsequently contacted via telephone re: any notes he may have in his
possession re: ATTA.i I claims he has no notes. He wrote an e-mail requesting a
copy of the 1-94 ATTA presented on 01/10/01 to determine if he in fact wrote the 8-
months on the 1-94. The e-mail was deleted from the system
OIG004-0192
Memorandum of Investigation
Date: March 20, 2002
Case Number. 2002003602 Page 2
Item Number:
11 Law Enforcement Privacy
2002003602 Office
On April I7;:>2p02. at approximately 1:15 p.m., DQJ/OIG Special Agents (SAs)| fend
I [interviewed Immigration Inspector (IQl kt the Immigration & Naturalization
\Service (INS) Administrative Office area, Miami International Airport. The purpose of the interview was
to determine if HI Irnade handwritten entries on the original Arrival / Departure Record (1-94)
belonging to Mohamed Atta, dated January 10, 2001 with admission number 68653985708. Prior to any
questioning, HI |vas given an administrative •warning (Kalkines), OIG Form IH-226/3 (Warnings
and Assurances to Employee Requked to Provide Information), and was subsequently placed under oath.
Ill I agreed to being interviewed by the OIG and stated the following:
OIG004-0193
| [said his stamps look alike and on several occasions placed the wrong stamp on the 1-94 -
Had to cross out and make handwritten changes to the 1-94
B-2s are issued for up to six months. If more time is needed, normally tell passenger to file for an
extension
After filing for an extension, the passenger will receive notice in the mail (1-797) and a approval
letter from INS with the expiration date
j |did not know why the NIIS report shows a date of September 8, 2001
If Atta entered on January 10,2001, a six-month visa would be issued until July 9, 2001
The top portion of the 1-94 goes to the contractor at the Nebraska Service Center for data entry,
with the bottom portion going to the passenger
Upon departing the U.S, the passengers turn the bottom portion (Departure Record) over to the
airlines
The airlines in turn hands over the I-94's to INS - INS sends to service center for data entry into
NIIS
In regard to Customs Declarations - IIs are only concerned with the form being filled out
correctly, and the signature on the Customs form matches with the signature on the passport
| [said he does not recall placing a B-l date stamp in Atta's passport or issuing him a 30 day
\l visa
| jalso said the handwriting on the 1-94 was not his - nor does he know whose handwriting
appears on the 1-94
No additional information
0100044)194
Memorandum of Investigation
Date: April 17, 2002
Case Number: 2002003602 Page 2
Item Number:
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
This is an administrative inquiry regarding allegations of misconduct or conduct that affects your capacity to
carry out your official duties, la accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, you are advised that the authority to
conduct this interview is contained in the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended, and in Department of Justice
Order 1393-90.
The purpose of this interview is to obtain information which will assist in the determination of whether administrative
action is warranted.
You arc going to be asked a number of specific questions regarding the performance of your official duties and
conduct that affects your capacity to carry out your official duties.
You have a duty to reply to these questions and disciplinary action, including dismissal, may be undertaken if you
refuse to answer or fail to reply fully and truthfully.
Neither your answers nor any information or evidence gained by reason of your answers can be used against yon in any
criminal proceeding, except that if you knowingly and willfully provide false statements or information in your answers,
you may be criminally prosecuted for that action.. The answers you furnish and any information or evidence resulting
; therefore may be used in the course of disciplinary proceedings which could result in disciplinary action, including
dismissal
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Witness Date
Time Place
CERTIFICATION OF NON-COOPERATION
I herein certify that, after being advised of his/her rights and the obligation to cooperate in an administrative interview
undertaken by the Office of the Inspector General, on
I L
1-94 Arrival/DefiiirUin Record - Instruction*
This form must be completed by all persons except U.S. Citizens, returning resident
aliens, aliens with immigrant visas, and Canadian Citizens visiting or in transit
Type or print legibly with pen in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS. Use English. Do not
write oo the back of this form.
This (ornt is in two parts. Please complete both (he Amval Record (Items I through
13) and the Departure Record (Items 14 through 17).
When all items are completed, present this form to the U.S. Immigration and
Naturalization Service Inspector.
Hem 7-If you arc entering the United States by land, enter LAND in this space. If
you are entering the United States hy ship, enter SEA in this space.
Admiukw Number
OR
I I I I
Immigration and \
Naturalization Service £^C* \^- /&#/
t-y4
T IU v^
f // t-"
I —_-S~^
*^
Arrival Record
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy---
1 . Fimily N«me -^- /-J*&Z. "
1 1 l 1 l 1 l 1 l t 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 First (Given) name 3. Birth Date (Diyflik/Yr)
I I 1 l l l l l I I 1 I I I I 1
4. Country of Citizenship S. Sex (Male or Ferule)
1 I 1 ) 1 1 1 1 1 I f 1 l 1 1 1 l
6. Passport Number 7. Airline and Ri jhl Number
1 1 I 1 1 1 1 | 1 1 | l 1 1 1 l
8. Country Where Yo» Li»e 1. City Whene You Boarded
1 1 l l 1 1 l 1 l l l 1 i t •
10. City Where Visa Was Issued 1 1. Date Issued (Diy/MofYr)
1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 l 1 1 l 1 l 1 i
12. Address While in the United States (Number ind Street)
l 1 l l l 4 i | 1 l 1 i
13. City and State
1 1 1 1 1 1 1. 1 1 1 I I l l i 1 l
Departure Nwcbcr
Immigration and
Naturalization Service
B?|
Departure Record
L 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
15. First (Given) Name 16. BUlh Date (tty/Mu/Yr)
1 i l | i i i | i i l [ 1 1 1 1 l 1
17. Country of Citizenship
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 t 1 1 1
OIG004-0196
See Other Side STAPLE HERE
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
Dnj/oiG
U.S. Department of Justice
Office of the Inspector General
Office of the General Counsel
Room 4261
950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
\Vashington, DC 20530
Fax:| Telephone:! I
-,
.
•** • ;
TO:
-
FAX:
FROM: . l^t f LcJ \~te- LI
PHONE NUMBER:
MESSAGE:
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION:
OIG004-0197
DOJ/OIG
\r 16 2002 U--52 p 02
Monday, April 15. 2002 1.51 PM
08
t _ . _ i . i i. i i i i a-.; w w ' £ - , : .
'
*l
J—L JL.
It Sin*. DM (OwtMonrf )
a. I. ..L ,.l- .I
WjrtunJ - A
to cUptrtnu'on. '
I«porunt -Retail ttni papni'l1ny<nir»ow»»»Joii;j»u m.,i l
!««« </•<« KX F»n<ire bj fa xa KH> di'j-y ywir »»uy IMI Ibt US. in lh» funir,.
f-M «r* MtlwriiT4 !• -Mr :" ><« U «. ntlii until th. cUk >«rttwn en Uiu >»i-»v. To ,
ronuln t""- *'• 4it>, oilhiMt (iaraixkm from tfnmipjlim nuowMii... i» • VUUUM
Surrender thi* permit »h*n you l««vc tile U.S.-
• lr tH >r ilr, U ttK tniKpJrtMJW liM;
.
i W4c«. W a U A OBicM '
. ,
en j»n ! »r FVi» 1-20 prior (e tut«iUi»j tUi permit.
JtM»r4 of Uik^*.
n -x
Drparivcc . A
ItvcorA
C»tri«:
OIG004-0198
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
OIG004-0208
MemoraBdum of Investigation
Dale: 12/20/2001
Case Number: 2002000438 Page 2
Ilem Number:
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
On March 19._2Q02. at approximately 5:40 p.m., POI/QIG Special Agents (SAs)r~ land
1 liBterviewed Senior Immigration Inspector f SRT)f At the Immigration &
Naturalization Service (INS) Training area, Miami International Airport (MIA). Also present during the
interview was DOJ Attorney Stephen Fallowfield. The purpose of the interview was to determine the
handling and processing of Moharped Atta's entry into the United States through MIA on January 10,
2001. Prior to any questioning, SRll "Twas given an administrative warning (Kalkines), OIG Form
111-22 6/3 (Warnings and Assurances to Employee Required to provide Information), but was not placed
under oath, SRll hgreed to being interviewed by the OIG and stated the following:
OIG004-0199
On March 21, 2002, DOJ/OIG Special Agent (SA)|_ blephonicallv contacted Senior
Immigration Inspector (SRI1 I in connection with the entry of Mohamed Atta into the
United States through Miami International Airport on January 10, 2001. SRJT [was not given any
administrative warning, nor was he placed under oath prior to any questioning. SRll I agreed to
speak with SJ\d stated the following:
o
Stated that he does not maintain notes for non adverse action cases
; o
Speculated that if Atta was just going to be training for a few hours then he would
have been admissible as B-2
o Stated a passenger who is taking flight training can be admitted as a B-2 if:
• The passenger is applying for entry as a B-2
\ Has a valid B-2 visa
\ Stated a passenger possessing a B-2 visa can be admitted if the inspector
knows the PAX intends to file an 1-20 to become a student
• Stated a 1-530 and 1-20 are abandoned if the applicant leaves the US A—
; therefore the applicant would have to re-apply
OIG004-0200
Special Agent Name Date: March 21, 2002
and Signature:
OIGFortn HI -207/2 (10/23/96) This doct*nen! contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the /G. /I is the property of the IG and is loaned to your agency; il and
its contents are nor to be distributed oatsidf of your agency.
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
On April 16. 2002. at approximately S;:00 p.m., DOJ/OIG Special Agents (SAs)l
I Interviewed Senior Immigration Inspector! lat the Immigration &
Naturalization Service (INS) Admintstrative^Qffice area, Miami International Airport (MIA). The
purpose of the interview was to determine if SRJ [made handwritten entries on the original
Arrival /Departure Record (1-94) belonging to Mbbamed Atta, dated January 10, 2001 with admission
number 68653985708. Prior to any questioning, SRJI ~]was given an administrative warning
(Kalkines)i OIG Form III-226/3 (Warnings and Assurances to Employee Required to provide
Information), and was subsequently placed under oath. SRJ.I [agreed to being interviewed by the
OIG and stated the following:
010004-0201
The top portion of the 1-94 is to filled out if the computer goes down and manual entries have to
be made _____
In looking at the copy of the I-94J fcaid he could not tell if the document was a
counterfeit. He needs to see the original. However, the wording on the admission stamp appear
to be spelled correctly
1 Idoes not recall making any changes / notations on Atta's 1-94. He was not sure if the
handwriting was his. He never seen or heard of any INS directive about -writing over stamps.
In regard to a passport entry,! Ithe passport would normally be stamped with the
classification and not the date. The INS policy prefers Us to stamp and not write dates in the
passport.
B-l visas - have seen more than three months issued - if no problems, a GS-07, 08, 11, can
authorize without a supervisors approval
B-2 visas - more than six months normally requires a supervisors approval
Depends on superiors and passenger flow in secondary - sometimes a supervisor wants to see
every case and on some days does not "Speed is the name of the Game"
If the supervisors in secondary are not expediting passengers in a timely manner, the supervisor
must write a memo or cc-mail the Port Director, which in turn effects the Us Performance
Evaluation Report - mostly internal
The Airlines are also responsible for making sure the 1-94's are filled out correctly. There are
Passenger Processing Representatives who assist the passengers with filling out the I-94s.
There is nothing INS can do to prevent an alien from crossing out and making changes to an I-
94. Its not uncommon for aliens to purchase stamps and make changes
Customs Declaration also shows the intent or classification in which a passenger is intending to
enter the U.S.
No additional information
010004-0202
Memorandum of Investigation
Date: April 16, 2002
Case Number: 2002003602 Page 2
Item Number:
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
This is an administrative inquiry regarding allegations of misconduct or conduct that affects your capacity to
carry out your official duties. In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, you are advised that the authority to
conduct this interview is contained in the Inspector General Act of 1978. as amended, and in Department of Justice
Order 1393-90.
The purpose of this interview is to obtain information which will assist in the determination of whether administrative
action is warranted.
You are going to be asked a number of specific questions regarding the performance of your official duties and
conduct that affects your capacity to carry out your official duties.
You have a duty to reply to these questions and disciplinary action, including dismissal, may be undertaken if you
refuse to answer or fail to reply fully and truthfully.
Neither your answers nor any information or evidence gained by reason of your answers can be used against you in any
criminal proceeding, except that if you knowingly and willfully provide false statements or information in your answers,
you may be criminally prosecuted for that action. The answers you furnish and any information or evidence resulting
therefore may be used in the course of disciplinary proceedings which could result in disciplinary action, including
dismissal.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Witness Date
CERTIFICATION OF NON-COOPERATION
1 herein certify that, after being advised of his/her rights and the obligation to cooperate in an administrative interview
undertaken by the Office of the Inspector General, on
OIG Form IU-226/3 (10/07/99) Warnings and Assurances to Employee Required to Provide Information
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
On April 22, 2002. at approximately 4:08 p.m., DOJ/OlG Special Agents (SAsf Jand
Jinterviewed Senior Immigration Inspector (SRI)[ Jat the Immigration &
Naturalization Service (INS) Administrative Office area, Miami International Airport (MIA). The
purpose of the interview was to determine if'SRll Imade handwritten entries on the original
Arrival / Departure Record (1-94) belonging to Mphamed Atta, dated January 10, 2001 with admission
number 68653985708. Prior to any questioning, SRIf ""Was given an administrative warning
(Kalkines), and was subsequently placed under oath. SRJL_^_Iiagreed to being interviewed by the
OIG and stated the following:
OIO004-0204
Special Agent NameX^Zannine L. Marino Date: April 22, 2002
and Signature;
OIG Form ril-207/2 (10/23/96) This dociffnait contains neither recommendations nor conclusions ofthelG. It is the property of the iG and is loaned to your agency; U and
its contents art not to bt distributed outside of your agency.
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
This is an administrative inquiry regarding allegations of misconduct or conduct that affects your capacity to
carry out your official duties. In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, you arc advised that the authority to
conduct this interview is contained in the Inspector General Act of 1 978 , as amended, and in Department of Justice
Order 1393-90.
The purpose of this interview is to obtain information which will assist in the determination of whether administrative
action is warranted.
You are going to be asked a number of specific questions regarding the performance of your official duties and
conduct that affects your capacity to carry out your official duties.
You have a duty to reply to these questions and disciplinary action, including dismissal, may be undertaken if you
refuse to answer or fail to reply fully and truthfully.
Neither your answers nor any information or evidence gained by reason of your answers can be used against you in any
; criminal proceeding, except that if you knowingly and willfully provide false statements or information in your answers,
you may be criminally prosecuted for that action. The answers you furnish and any information or evidence resulting
therefore may be used in die course of disciplinary proceedings which could result in disciplinary action, including
dismissal
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Date
Time Place
CERTIFICATION OF NON-COOPERATION
I herein certify that, after being advised of his/her rights and die obligation to cooperate in an administrative interview
undertaken by the Office of the Inspector General, on
OIG004-0206
U.S. Depastmeat of Justice CcrtificaLeof Eligibility for Nonimmigrant (M-l) Sludenl
ligration and Naturalization Service' SuLus-Por Vocational Students (OMB No /J/5-005/)
must be completed ind stpned ut the U.S. by t destfiuted school official.
10. School Ccrtir«tboii I Mrtifj un<i«r ^nuJty of penury iblt •£ informilKjo [i">»xl«l tixjt m lltrm 1. IXroujh I wrn. torapUtal b«foM 1 wsn«d iku lam lllJ » ITU« ud eocnet: I
nKOtfi Ihu form a th« Oul^ Sl.l~ .fUr r««ie» ui4 «r«luai<«i m th« (JmUd SU£« kr me or olhtr oflicuU. of Uu ichool of Un rtudtnt's applK«oil, CruKnpU 01 other ncordi o(
eoutw* Uku ud proof of fluiKul meoniibiUtr vhich w>n irctiwl <l tht Khool prof to thu •itcutioa o( thu form. Oi« Khool hu dtttnnutd Ihlt <h< ibon ountd (hidcat'i qiulifiei.
box «•«•! all itandtnb (or .dmWion to the ichool, On itudtnt will I* raquirtd lo pw»u< > lull cnurx of itudj u dtfliwil br « CFR 114 2(O(6), I to > dctiputnl efflcul of ttwibon
n«m«d KCtool «0d r*m «ntbonxcd lo IMUC thu form
Ifgnatcn of cUdputed school of/icud: Name of designated school official t title <pnnt or f Date and place issued Icily tnJ Hsti)
/PZJT&. /•k&ZT- Ilicole Antinif Student Coord. OS/29/00 Venice,
11. 8tid<M CtrtiflutioD I hix KM! ind .p»rd U complr with tbt Itrnu ud condition! of my xtrnwoii «nd IhoK of i«r citcmion of *«y u ipttUitd on j»ri 2 I ecrtu")- till «U
informatiaB Jfondwl on this form rtfra to mt lad u uv« ud com* to tin b.«l of roj knowlrfte I cntif>- Uul t Htt u inter or nnujri in th« OorUd Sut«« Umpomdr, ««d loltly for
th« por^OK of PUIMJOJ > full eoum of rtiKir al ike Kkool «am«i on ilem ! ot thu form. I «l«o lulhonnd the iua«d «ctiool to itttiM any mfonrulnjn trom ray rtcordi whRh « »«dnt
by a< INS punualt to 5 CFR ZHJif).
Signature of student: Name of student fpnnf or typt) Date
Mohomed Atta
Stature of parent or c^iaMiao (Ifttudint » under 18) ' Name of parent or guardian (jirml or l>p»J Date
1084-llfebQ OR
i i i i i i i i i i i i
Servioo de Inraigncidn U.S. IMMIGRATION
y Nttunlizaodo
GBO MIAMHAP 1955
1-94
Rttmfao dc Ikputa
UNTIL _Jj:
i i i i i i i
.r. .ft./.
OIG004-0158
10/22/01 11:41 FAI 7018395' OME Eg 003
j
1 24. D Bond 25. D Prospective Student
26. hinertry/Coaunents
1ie£»u*c( K-r
zr.JHi
t 1 I
OIG004-015»
STXI1300 STUDENT/SCHOOL SYSTEM 10/23/2001
SCHOOL INFORMATION 10:35
Q.
OIG004-0155
STXI1260 STUDENT/SCHOOL SYSTE 10/23/2001
INFORMATION - CURRENT S_.VTUS 10:34
ADMISSION NUMBER: GEN01509490 ALTERNATE ADMISSION NUMBER:
STUDENT NAME: ATTA MOHOMED
DATE OF BIRTH: 19680109 COUNTRY CITIZEN: 358 EGYPT
DATE OF LAST UPDATE: 10052001
A/D STATUS: COUNTRY OF RES/BIRTH:
A#: ENTRY PLACE/DATE:
CURNT CLASS/DATE Ml 20010717 ADMIT CLASS/DATE:
DURATION STATUS: PRIOR ARRIVALS: N
LAST DEPART DATE: PRIOR DEPARTURES: N
SCHOOL CODE/NAME MIA1096000
MAJOR FLD STUDY: 810
STU STAT CD/DATE: 00000000 LEVEL OF EDUC: SECD EST COMP DATE: 20010901
CURRENT ADDRESS: NOTATIONS BOND FLAG
OVERSTAY:
WAIVER:
STATE: ZIP: APPREN FLAG:
c OIG004-01S6
STXI1240 STUDENT/ SCHOOL SYST 10/23/2001
INFORMATION - BENclFI.o 10:34
ADMISSION NUMBER: GEN01509490 ALTERNATE ADMISSION NUMBER:
STUDENT NAME: ATTA MOHOMED
--- PRACTICAL TRAINING ---
SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER: FROM TO
EMPLYMT AUTHORIZED:
FROM:
TO:
EXTENSION GRANTED TO:
EXT DENIED V/D TO: DATE OF LAST UPDATE:
REINSTATED : Y
PREVIOUS SCHOOL
TRANSFER DATE:
CODE /NAME :
c
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
Departure Xmnbii
b8b53S851 08
Immigration and M 1
) Service
I-M
Departure' Bee ord
ADMITT
UNTIL
14. Funilj N»me
/iLTiA 7 ft"i i i i i i
Tint (Oivo,) Nu 18. Birth Date CD-y/Mo/Yr)
OIO004-0209
Warning - A nonimmigrant who accepts unauthorized employment is subject
to deportation.
Important -Retain this permit in your possession; you mwU surrender it when you
leave the U.S. Failure to do so may delay your entry into the U.S. in the future.
You are authorized to stay in the U.S. only until the date written on this form. To
remain past this date, without permission from immigration authorities, is a violation
of the law.
Surrender this permit when you leave the U.S.:
- By sea or air, to the transportation line;
- Across the Canadian border, to a Canadian Official;
- Across the Mexican border, to a U.S. Official.
Students planning to recnter the U.S..within 30 days to return to the same school, see
"Arrival-Departure* on page 2 of Form 1-20 prior to sun-ending this permit.
Record of Changes
OIG004-0210
•lO.'ia.-pl 12M2 FAX[~ L . - - I'S INS Admin Office HUP -. DISTRICT
The following is a report of the travel profile of Mohamed ATTA, DOB: 09/01/1968,
Country of Citizenship Egypt/Iraq, Passport # 1617066 (Egypt).
Spain. Upon arrival (17:03 Hours) Mr. Atta was referredIby the primary officer,
Immigration frispectoil [(Stamp ff-'/y \, the referral read as follows:
"Pax turned in a 120AB but has had a response, meanwhile he's attending flight
training school, already-was in school For 5/6 months, please verify."
"Subject applied for M-l. IrS. Adjusted status. No overstay/No removal grounds
Ibuud."
It appears that Inspector!! [reviewed CLAIMS and found an extension request for
bis admission of June 03,2000. Mr. Atta application to extend his stay was received by
the service center on September 22, 2000. At the time no action had been taken on the
request by the Texas Service Center (The extension was finally approved on July 17,
2001 and was granted until October 01,2001). After conducting the interview wilh no
grounds of inidmissibility found Mr. Atta was admitted B2 until July 09, 2001.
As for the rwj separate 1-94 arrival records on Jan 10,2001 it is possible the Inspector
1 [stamped the completed 1-94 while Mr. Atta was at his booth arid then he was
referred to hard secondary, the 1-94 could of remained at the inspection booth and was
later collected. Later during the secondary interview another 1-94 arrival record was
complete and collected for entry into the Non Immigrant Information System (NflS).
The subjects' non-immigrant visa would only have been cancelled under Section 222 (g)
if he had not requested an extension of stay.
OIO004-0211
] . '10--19/01 1 2 : 1 2 J - A X J | . us INS Adnin Office MIAP - DISTSJCT
Stamps Numbers:
Stamp#1 Iwasissuedtolaspectoij |on September 21,1998. The
stamp was retired on Mar.ch 6, 2001 and destroyed. j
OIG004-0212
9/11 Lav; Enforcement Privacy
On January 24, 2002, at approximately 1:25 p.m., DOJ-OIG Special Agent (SAl I
interviewed Deputy Port Director Annette Bywaters, Immigration & Naturalization Service (INS)
Inspections Branch, Miami District Office. Bywaters was told she was being interviewed as witness in
connection with captioned investigation. The purpose of the interview was to determine how INS
employees processed Mohamed Atta's entries into the United States and how he was able to remain in
the United States. The interview took place at Port Everglades, 1800 EUer Drive, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida.
Bywaters agreed to being interviewed and stated the following:
Since December 2001, Bywaters has been the Acting Port Director at Port Everglades in Ft. Lauderdale,
Florida. Bywaters has also been the Deputy Port Director for the Inspections Branch, circa 1999. Prior
to 1999, Bywaters was the Assistant Port Director at Miami International Airport (MIA).
Bywaters was shown a copy of Atta's Application to Extend / Change Nonimmigrant Status (Form I-
539), and asked to define the difference between an 1-539 and Application to Register Permanent
Residence or Adjust Status (Form 1-485). According to Bywaters, an alien who enters the U.S. as a B-l
/ B-2 visitor and wants to become a Legal Permanent Resident must file an 1-485. If an alien enters the
U.S. on a B-l /B-2 visitor visa and wishes to extend their stay in the U.S., he/she must file an 1-539 with
INS Based upon the 1-539 filed by Atta, Bywaters said Atta requested a change from one non-
immigrant status (B-l / B-2) to another non-immigrant status (M-l - Vocational Student or other Non-
Academic Student) and not for an adjustment of status.
As per INS policy and procedures relating to a pending 1-485 application, if an alien departs the U.S. and
fails to notify the INS, then the alien's application is considered abandoned. If the alien contacts INS
prior to departing the U.S., and authorization was granted through the filing of an Application for Travel
Document (Form 1-131), then the alien can reenter the U.S. without any penalty. The filing of an 1-485
application is standard operating procedure throughout INS and each District; however, the handling or
processing of an 1-485 upon return may differ from District to District. In most cases, an alien fails to
notify INS about his/her departure from the U.S. Upon returning to the U.S., the alien frequently claims
he/she is married to a U.S. citizen and was not familiar with the INS policy relating to the 1-485
application. Bywaters said there are two options; send the alien home or send to deferred inspection for
fbrther review. _._
\1
In Atta's case, it appears he did not file an 1-485 application but an 1-539 with INS. The filing of an 1-539
application is also standard operating procedure throughout INS and each District; however, the handling
or processing of the 1-539 upon return to the U.S. may differ from District to District. Bywaters was
unfamiliar with the different processes and recommended the DIG speak with Don Monica, Assistant
District Director for Examinations, Miami District Office. Additionally, the INS field manuals located on
"Inserts" would also have INS policy and procedure^ rf^fjno ta the-, filing of an 1-539 applicatioa
\: January 24,2002
Special Agent N
and Signature: f
OIG Furra JII-2072 (10^23/96) This docmcnt contains neither rccanmend&tions nor rrarlurion; ttflhe 1G. It ii ttie frtperty oftheSGand a loaned Jo your agency; il aid
Ux contents are not tn be dwrilntjed avtiidf ofycvr agency.
In reviewing Atta's 1-539 undated application, Atta entered the U.S. on June 3, 2000 as a B-l / B-2
visitor, which expired on December 2, 2000. In the "Application Type" section of the 1-539, Atta
checked a change of status from a B-l / B-2 to an M-l status and did not check the extension box. In the
"Processing Information" section of the 1-539 for an extension, Atta wrote September 1, 2001. INS
granted Atta's change of status to M-l in July 2001 with an extension to October 1, 2001.
In reviewing a Computer Linked Application Information System (CLAIMS) printout, By waters said
Atta filed for a change of status on September 22, 2000, however INS approval was not authorized until
July 17, 2001.
An INS Non-Immigrant Information System (NIIS) printout shows Atta was issued a tourist visa on May
18, 2000 in Berlin, Germany. According to Bywaters, most tourist visas are issued for at least one year
and are rarely issued for six months. The NIIS also shows Atta's B-l / B-2 visa expired on December 2,
2000 and yet he departed the U.S from MIA on January 4, 2001. Atta returned to MIA on January 10,
2001. Based upon Atta's departure and entry into the U.S., Bywaters did not know if Atta abandoned
his change of status application and deferred the question to the INS legal counsel for further review.
Tn regard to Atta possibly being in an overstay status as of December 2, 2000, Bywaters also
recommended that the OIG speak with the INS legal counsel. Bywaters said she did not know if Atta's
tourist visa was considered expired with a pending change of status application on file. Bywaters believes
an INS memorandum, 222. G, relates to non-immigrant visas and change of status. In reviewing page two
of the 1-539 form under "penalties," Bywaters said there was no mention of an alien loosing his/her status
if departing the U.S. with a pending change of status application on file with INS.
In addition to Atta departing MIA on January 4, 2001, Bywaters said the 1-94 (Arrival — Departure
Record) would show Atta's departure date. According to Bywaters, the airlines receive the 1-94 from the
passengers with the bottom portion going to INS. The 1-94's are wrapped with the Aircraft / Vessel
Report (1-92) and sent to the INS office in South Dakota for data input by UNIB AND, a contract
company. However, the turn around time varies for the entry of 1-94 information into the NIIS database.
With Atta returning to the U.S. on January 10, 2001(approx. six days later), Bywaters believes the data
was not entered in a timely manner by UNIB AND. If the data was not entered in a timely manner,
Bywaters said the inspectors at MIA would not be privy to the fact that Atta's tourist visa expired on
December 2, 2000, which put Atta possibly in an overstay status. If Alta returned to the U.S. with the
same visa, and had a valid reason for bis overstay (pending application), then INS can allow Atta back
into the U.S. for a fee of $175.00. If Atta returned to the U.S. with a new visa, Bywaters believes Atta
would be eligible to return to the U.S. Bywaters again deferred the question to the INS legal counsel to
determine whether or not Atta was eligible to return to the U. S.
Prior to September 11, 2001, all I-94's were shipped via U.S. Postal Service to the INS office in South
Dakota. After September 11, 2001, all I-94's are sent via Federal Express. Bywaters recommended that
UNIBAND be contacted to determine when Atta's 1-94 was updated after his January 10,2001 entry.
Bywaters reiterated the problem lies with data not being entered into NQS in a timely manner.
Re: Meeting with Deputy Director Carmelo Ortiz, Immigration & Naturalization Service Center, in
Dallas Texas
On February 13, 2002, at approximately 10;00 a.m., DOJ-OIG Special Agent (SAl Imet
with Deputy Director Carmelo Ortiz, Immigration & Naturalization Service Center, in Dallas, Texas. The
meeting took place at the Miami District Naturalization Office, in Miami, Florida/ The purpose of the
meeting was to establish liaison with the Texas Service Center and to obtain any/and all documents
relating to Mohamed Atta. Ortiz agreed to cooperate and assist the OIG.
Ortiz was shown a copy of Atta's Application to Extend / Change Nonimmigrant Status (Form 1-539)
and asked if the Texas Service Center had similar information. Ortiz said the I-539's are handled along
with the I-20's at the Texas Service Center. SAl Itold Ortiz that Atta filed an 1-539 in September
2000, but the 1-539 was not approved until July 2001. In the interim, Atta departed the U.S. from Miami
International Airport (MIA) on January 4, 2001 and returned to MIA on January 10, 2001. According to
Ortiz, the 1-539 is abandoned and Atta was required to fiJe a, new 1-539. Additionally, an original or
approved 1-20 is required in order to reentry the U.S. In Atta's case, he Tvas also required to file a new I-
539 with INS after his reentry on January 10, 2001. Additionally, Atta jhust have an approved M-l visa
before he can attend any school in the U.S. The original 1-20 is forwarded to the applicant after approval,
with one copy going to the school and one copy going with the 1-539./
For further assistance, Ortiz recommended that contact be made with Gary Bradford, Director of
Operations at the Texas Service Center.l I V
;9/ll Law Enforcement Privacy
OTO004-0243
Team Number: 5 ;
JKR asked who else interviewed [about the/Atta entry. He said a few months after
9/11 he was interviewedby the DOJ IG, and a i-ep of Torn Ridge; then again by DOJ IG.
(Nov March20,2002-| "tlDOJ IG; April 17.2002-1 I
I tPOJIG. He was never interviewed/by the FBI or CBP.
I I said he was questioned pn requirements for students, adjusting status, what do they
need in terms of documents to come into this country. He said they spoke to everyone -
himself, the officer in secondary fl [ the acting watch commander at the time and
acting port supervisor at the time. His colleagues said they were asked what their role
was. It was| impression they were looking for people to blame by the types of
questions they were asking.
Was trained at FLETC in 2000 for 3 months; brief training in counter-terrorism - a couple
of hours - an expert was brought in who discussed counterterrorism with us; showed
video; learned about different organizations. The training program was more concerned
with immigration policy and laws and not terrorists at that time.
Fraudulent Documents
JKR asked if video discussed any types of fraudulent documents passing through borders
and inspector's role? | [said it was geared to information on what kinds of groups there
are. He said they had training on document fraud of-maybe a week long, everything from
passport, visa, birth certificates, any kind of travel documents - can't really learn fraud -
it takes time. He said they were told what to look for regarding false stamps. He said
they would put documents on table and they would have to look it over and determine
which were the good and bad documents. They also had to write down why the
document was bad.
They also received database training. Each class lasted about a week. The instructors he
had were more focused on how computer worked rather than reading database; at
FLOTEC it's not how much you can learn - it was learn this now, then get rid of it; when
you get to port you will have more exposure to it.
,,.••'19/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
Mock Inspections / \y had mock primary inspection - lasted one day; one scenario
Cultural/Behavioral/Language Training i
Didn't get cultural training. They focused on mostly learning naturalization laws,
deportation charges; fire weapon. In terms of behavior training, they were told the
obvious -\ |etc. Since he speaks Spanish, he
just had to take the test and didn't have to stay extra 5 weeks for language training.
j ^ on primary line - from academy 1-2 weeks training at port before - then in booth
with training officer - if you had a good training officer it makes a big difference-1 had a
good training officer - by myself on the line in May/June 2000.
| Jsaid the chances of catching fraud are rare if you are not used to seeing the
I documents. He would ask purpose of coming to the U.S.; how long you will be here; do
I you have family here; where are you staying; last time you were here; for how long.
Then he would look at documents to the best of his ability -| ~~~~
I [said these are standard questions. He asked the questions to determine admissibility;
/ if a person has overstayed last time - find out why; how did you support yourself;
: concern is that they are living or working here illegally.
Bis
Bl was always "time needed." There is a lot of confusion on Bis he said. Many
officers would give 30 days; but the actual law says it is time needed - if someone comes
in for business and needs 2 months, we would give them 2 )A months. He thought this
was national policy. If there was some confusion they would just give them 30 days.
I I said he had pre-made stamps. The Bl was 30,days. If the person needed to stay
/ longer he would write it in.
Time for B2s was 6 months. He doesn't use stamps any more; he writes it down.
When asked if he felt he had discretion to give less time on a B2,| fcaid we were told
not to limit a B2 - even if you think it was an overstay - refer to secondary - it was port
policy.
Processing Time
Regarding processing time at Miami depending on what kind of day it was and what time
of year, sometimes the wait in line was 1-2 hours to get through secondary.
JJyR asked if there was a requirement to ask for return flight and itinerary; I Isaid is
was up to inspector - it would depend on who was in front of me; if it was a| |
1
am going to ask when you are going back hd.me - discretion of officer - learn this from
experience. I i
Adjudicate Normal Primary / I \ I'said depending on the documents you haye, he would look to
JKR asked if he could read Arabic stamps. | [said UAE stamps you can read; Dubai
you can; some of them you cannot. Lebanon you can; Egypt... He couldn't remember if
he could read Saudi Arabian or Pakistani stamps.
I Kvas asked during Jan. 2000 and pripr, if anyone at Miami was available that could
speak Arabic and he said he was not aware of anyone. When asked about continuing
training frorri Forensic Document Lab, he said when it comes to fraud, you learn with
experience. When asked if the port make sure there was someone around who is well
versed in stamps, he said he could always ask one of your colleagues or supervisor.
Treatment of Saudis |
| |said he did not see a lot of Saudis f the bulk of Arabs were Turkish (we had Turkish
Air); a few Saudis and a few Iranians. JHe stated he had no cultural perception of Saudis
pre9/ll. |
Targeting/Profiling I
JKR asked what unusual characteristics or answers would cause you to refer to
secondary.l i
JKR asked if he got Lookout hits prior to January 2001. He said he got hits everyday in
primary. Prior to 9/11 he never saw a hit for a terrorists; all the hits pre 9/11 were
immigration violations; customs lookout - drugs; lookout for DBA or lookout for
historical data.
Since 9/11, he has had terrorist hits. One of them was immigrant visa,
supposedly had connections with ALQ - sent to secondary -person was
admitted I think,
Another time, I questioned and pressured a person of Arab descent to get information;
asked for wallet to see if he had any local identification. Once you have been on the line
for awhile you get a sense of something is not right. His wallet was blank, he fainted in
front of me. I scanned passport and it was a hit for possible involvement with terrorist
organization. Don't know how it was adjudicated
I paid if you can't communicate, you use body language to talk to person; you learn
some languages; you learn a few words, use your hands for 4 months; if you still can't
communicate you could refer to secondary, but if no one in secondary to speak language
doesn't look good. Alitalia can help you with Italian; the only mideast airlines was from
Turkish Airline; most likely airline reps - Arabs arrived on flights from British Airways,
Air France, Lufthansa.
ATTA
I |^ what I stated that I don't remember the actual inspection; but could tell him what I
usually do. Don't remember ota'ct exchange.
J - here is his visa; and other side of visa page - can you tell me whether either 3 of the
admission stamps - I Ivas my admission stamp - 1/10/2001 dated.
|_J-1 might have been process of admitting him and I realized he didn't have proper
documents for going to school. I did all my stamping with Bl and B2 stamps - this type
of scenario - I stamped it and realized he didn't have proper papers and referred him to
secondary. My stamp on top left. Written B2 - not my writing, void written across not
mine.
The INS Inspection Results. -name of it is Muhammad Atta, came in DOB 09/01/68;
date 1/10/01 at 17:03 -says referral.-^ ttrainee inspector -"Passenger turned in an
I-20B but has not had a response; meanwhile he is attending flight training school;
"Not have a response" means he hadn't heard from change of status form to attend
school. .....-•-""
] -no
what was your concern with Atta; you wrote the report
- because he may have been here illegally or going to school illegally.
J- concern about visa?
| [ didn't have proper visa - he needs either an F or M depending on school
J - what was understanding of law in terms of change of status outstanding it was still
iding, he, leaV.es and comes back - was the application still valid
B regarding change of status, I did know if left the country and came back, he needed
the right visa. \- what if you .had known. he had overstayed a month
I [-there are 2 types 6f flight training - a pilot for training Bl - to learn how to be pilot
that is an Ml .... .. , ;.
J - you basically considered him he was possibly a student with wrong type of visa>-
what would you recommend in secondary?1
I kyes - at the time, you really don't have option, you bring up with supervisor and he
would have final word. Options for students: either admit because of adjusted status;
deny because he doesn't have right visa; if student comes in with visa but not 120, you
can parole him for 30 days.
Discretion of supervisor; will run checks to see if he is adjusting status - could admit or
send back.
J - he came in June; 2000, he applied immediately to flight school and attended ( came in
as B2 ) applied for change of status from B2 to student; then beginning of December his
permitted length of stay is up he stays another 2 weeks; finishes flight school, is done
with flight school, gets commercial pilot license. Leaves in January with pending
application after overstaying one month; goes away for one week and comes back on Jan.
10 - if you knew he was done with flight school, left with pending application and
overstayed, and you were secondary and had information - but he told primary he was
still in flight school and showed 120
|_ p when a person says in primary and secondary can give 2 different stories
J - isn't secondary following up on what primary says
Look at my comments and go in that direction; if the information I give and check my
computer - let me go through your bags and wallet. Can't always go with primary notes.
A lot of times, our paper system is not the best way to go - if the bottom portion of 1-94
for the most part there is no recdnl of you leaving the country. Can see when you entered,
for the most part, I can't tell when you left; Means I have to check receipts in bag or
drivers license. .
J - where were you in the process, when you decided to send him to secondary
What did you do with the 1-94 .
I Kttiis type of scenario, could have happened is I stamped 1-94, put on my light, asked
him to step aside
what I should have done, waited to do all my checks before stamping; should have
asked him to redo (-94
DHS
I [said to be honest, not much of a change; on primary, main goal is to process people
and get them in. Especially before 9/11. People think we are in charge but we are not in
charge of airport. The airlines are - they want more passengers to be processed faster.
We are told to process them and get them in. Occasional computers would go down, we
are told on customs to write TD (computer down) - or airlines would complain,
supervisors would get on us.
Now supposedly! {second time is not there; but mentally it is. Not uncommon to
have airline supervisor go to our supervisor and tell them we want them processed -
don't know if Customs will tolerate it - seen it several times - American Airlines will
come to our supervisors and tell him I want 5 more inspectors.
J ^ why would an inspector have discretion on B2s - why would that eliminate some
types of secondary
S yes, have contacted them on several occasions - if their computers are up, they can
x > - if not, we can go to embassy of that country. On weekends, its not always
available - 95$ of the time it is available.
Passenger Analytic Units - folks who work with NIC and do culling of manifests -
- not familiar
Message for Bonner: I don't see big different before and after 9/11 - no departure
control. '\1 Law Enforcement Privacy
Number of officers need to increase and I am quit6 sure the airlines would complain
Admit them as fast as, you <:an - airlines have way too much control at the airport - other
people have come.on detail and said same.
J - he was originally given 8 months - it looks like this stamp - you gave him 1 month -
was the 8 months ^ did it happen in secondary. Jan. 10/01 admitted 9/8/01 -
a either was an error - when you are in vocational classes 30 days beyond expiration of
;ses not more than a year. Gave him 30 days beyond when classes ended.
J -[~]humber of there - Bl not B2 - but 1-94 arrival stamp savsl
saysX looks like B1 and written over it B/2 -
land has date and
I V- not my handwriting
J - is it possible wrong inspector number got associated with this report - the secondary
hand wrote over admission stamp longer length of stay and was actually one that gave 8
months - got to be error - doesn't make sense.
. - -• ;;:;::: 9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
10
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
Team Number: 5
Background:
Said he did not really receive continued training. Learned about changes in policy and
law via memos. FDL fraud alerts put on clip board in hard secondary. Didn't know if
there was a binder with FDL alerts to check.
training was limited at the academy — about an hour or 2. Database training was limited -
did get some training in TEXT. Mock primary inspections - one class - one for the
border and one for an airport scenario. This was only in primary. No cultural training;
one behavioral class, can't remember what was covered. Language training in Spanish
for one month. Firearms training - everyday for about a week. Was not required to carry
fire arm only during TDF (Terrorism Detection and Fraud)- certain teams go to airplane
because aliens on aircraft. | " \
shuttling people to detention center. Did not have weapon in the line or secondary.
Pre 9/11: passenger comes up - swipe passport or visa; how long in US, what are you
intentions, how long did you stay last timej I
Length of stay for Bis pre 9/11 - generally about 30 days. Had one pre-made stamp that
he used or wrote in by hand. If they asked for. 2 weeks, I would give one month. If they
asked 3 months, it is discretion of officer to give up to 6 months.
Length of stay for B2s pre 9/11 - you can give up to a year; generally 6 months. Gave
beyond 6 months sometimes. This would happen generally in secondary. If you wanted
to give less than 6 months, you have to refer because 6 months is standard B2 admission.
As a primary officer, I have referred to secondary.
Generally would process them as fast as you can move them - general understanding was
the faster the better - with our evaluations there is a time set -1 think! "I for
aliens, not sure. If you want to pass an evaluation you tried to do that.
Pressure to process quickly - everybody felt it - pressure came from headquarters down -
I felt it was national policy. Did not feel there was a port policy about referrals to
\; just needed to make sure referrals were good and not frivolous - counted on
your evaluation. Have to have basis for referral. \"
Not familiar with Saudi or UAE documents - did not see many of them.
View of Saudis pre 9/11, general feeling amongst inspector - wasn't very look that we
had finished Desert Storm - they are just like any other alien — nothing highlighted them
vs. people from other countries. Primary concern about being admissible was - out of
status, altered document, hit, overstay. In secondary, a little bit deeper because you are
conducting interviews and could go the full gambit. No Arabic speakers available on
primary or secondary line - have to call for translators. The airlines did not help with
Arabic.
19/11 Law Enforcement Sensitive
Targeting/Profiling /
Not concerned if traveling alone on B2 visa; if you have over $10,000 sent to Customs.
People coming in stay with family members so $$ not a concern or removable*..
If I can't communicate with someone in primary, try to go with French (we have people
that speak French). Arabic speaker back then the general procedure unless you see
document fraud, you admit them - even if you can't communicate - you can check their
ticket and money. /
Atta
On January 10, 2001.1 Isaid he was primarily working hard secondary. Does not
recollect interviewing Atta.
JKR - in the first DOJ IG interview, vague interview, any recollection nqw?[_Jsaid
no.
JKR - secondary officer] | January 10, 2001 at 1800. (went to primary at 1703).
"Subject applied for Ml I.S. Adjusted status. No overstay/no removal grounds found."
My understanding he applied for Ml - doesn't remember if it was a database check -
| |-he adjusted from one status to another by filing from Ml - looks like it was
approved so he was not out of status and no overstay. Would normally check to see if he
is overstay.
JKR - For flight training school attending - would you have verified? - with student
school system given you information he was still in school?
JKR - I'm asking because we got information from system. Updated August 2001.
7/17/01 current class date. If his application had been pending and not approved, would
the student school system if it is current hold the information about the status?
| F- we have applications in CLAIMS that were approved that we still can't find.
I I- if the 194 W was turned in, if the airline did it properly, if it was inputted.
JKR - one of the things you said in prior interviews with Miami field office of DOJ IG -
I 1^ was you recalled Atta referred to hard secondary as a possible overstay, you
checked records a n d . . . , . and applied for change of status from tourist to student."
Curious about extension because we haven't received any documents about extension.
| h don't recollect.
JKR - let's say data systems .had all information; hypothetical: Let's look at stamps first,
because its confusing
above it. If primary made mistake and:put stamp in but then sent to secondary, would
primary write void.
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
| [- sometimes the primary guys do it - no set poh'cy.
JKR - records indicate this was y6ur stamp - can yoia distinguish what number is?
JKR - on this one - it looks like US Immigration Miami - its | | not your stamp - the
dates are stamped in instead of handwritten 2/9/01 - but crossed out - new date and entry
type entered - SOP to change 194 and passport if you needed to make change of
admissipn status in secondary?
I [Change both? You can do that or do entire 194 over again. Don't know if that's my
>\. '*
Hypothetical: you were under impression that Atta had applied for Ml and was in status
and had adjusted status. What was your understanding of pending application if someone
leaves the country with application still pending?
j [^depends on application
JKR - if you knew Atta had overstayed visa for one week and left and came back -
would it have affected your adjudication?
JKR - if you had been able to determine he had finished his schooling even though he
had given 194 to inspector?
I |- if student said that he was finished with school, - the system could have said he
was finished but he is riot- have to go on his word. Working with student system that
was a piece of garbage / nothing factual - arbitrary - claims filed late - it was useless.
Have to use it - but what you get out of it to base adjudication - not good.
JKR - if you had seen in CLAIMS that he had not adjusted status?
What if he says he is full time student and he has Ml not B2 - does it affect adjudication?
CD--—
Regular practice to let people in a different rubric than a Ml -
Can you come in and take English classes, yes.
JKR - difference from full time or occasional school
JKR - would you have asked questions about where he is attending school, what type of
school
| K! don't think-so
| [^ jf you canfindit. Would ask how long you are attending. Depends on school -
university you .go for semester h6urs. You have guys coming in for one class at aviation
school - depends on school set up - it could be Ml, depending on facts.
JKR if he is attending flight school and he sought to adjust status to attend flight school,
would you think he was going full time? : ;<:;
, . ;;:::-:;:;;:;|?'9/ll Law Enforcement Privacy
I- not necessarily - yes or no. .. , :/
I k still gray - because yoli have pebple coming from all over the world because it is
cheaper - some come for nightflying,instrument flying, a class - grey area - because
they don't run like college institution.
1 clarify the law - set .strict limits on B2 - because it is too vague - incidental to a
B2 is wide open - what is definition of "incidental."
JKR - law has changed since 9/11 - can't request change of status as student while you
are here - have to go back abroad to do it.
JKR - what helps you in secondary - to have all facts in front of you - to do adjudication
I I- a student system that is accurate - SEVIS is a lot better than what we had -
US VIS IT will take care of overstays in the future - CLAIMS is still not up to date
because of massive amount of petitions.
JKR - what about biometrics - would it help in secondary? Consolidated Visa Data
Base?
| |we love it - its great - it will pick up altered visas. - it's a great tool.
JKR - in, situation where someone comes back in as a student, would you have checked
- no
Would have IDENT if you had suspected | [>r doing a case then you enroll
them.
JKR - check to see how much money - in a situation where they are going back to school
JKR - as far as you are concerned, flight school could fit into either Bl or B2?
JKR - what do you think overall policy on adjudications? Was there pressure to admit
did you feel it was difficult to go to supervisor not to admit
I
JKR - because INA says the opposite - the burden of proof on alien - but in practice it is
on the inspector and the U.S.
]-yes
I- no — just overall............................................:::::::::
- - Law Enforcement Privacy
DHS ,""""/ /5f /
Familiar with National Targeting Center v have used it and is helpful
Changes on line since CBP has taken over: USVISIT extremely positive
| |-its improving -facilitation is not prmiary issue as it was in the past; border
security is now primary issue. Happier with the way it is now.
JKR - if someone like Mr. Atta; came before you now, what do you think would be the
adjudication assuming the change in your databases and information available to you
now, i.e. SEVIS and overstay information.
L___f- In today's climate, if anything was; violated, he would be gone. If we have data
systems that work,, the attitude of servic0 less likely to facilitate and give waivers on the
assumption.that everything has been approved.
JKR - would you have considered a deferred or paroled for 30 days to verify his status?
| |- don't know /
| \- 1 f you defer, you are deferring inspection - means get your paperwork together. A
parole is a deferral. /
JKR - on statement that Mr.| (wrote "he is attending flight school" - would you
ever try to verify that any other way other than school system - would you pick up
phone?
| |- you could - can't recall I did that for a flight school. Did that once in awhile for
other schools.
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
If Atta had come up as done with school, would it have affected your adjudication??
As coming in as a b2?
- don't think so
JKR - you find out he lies and has B2 which is legitimate as tourist? Does it raise
questions as why is lying?
I \- if there is inconsistency, it would - hit all the databases you can to get to the
bottom of it. You would interview him - and ask him why did you say this and why did
you say than - and if the answers are inconsistent, then - if you don't have anything
\e on INA - then he is being admitted. Now, if you verified that he lied, he would
be in a world of hurt considering his country of origin- on the legal side - is there
\g to remove him - massive questions.
\R - would it affect your questioning if he had been here 8 months, left for a week and
came back to ask for another 6 months -
\ \- tried to figure out if he has been working in US illegally or living here. If you
\t prove it, you can't bar him.
\R - if you take a sworn statement from him and you can get him for lying under oath?
- no, it's a criminal charge. Misrepresenting a material fact - back in the grey again.
- it's getting better - take a while to work things out the merge with Customs -
technology wise, attitude - here to do job and not for airlines .
10
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
Team Number: 5 i
JKR asked if| [had been interviewed by anyone else regarding the Atta entry. She said
the FBI interviewed her about 2-3 weeks after 9/11 when the discovered Atta came out
of deferred inspection. The FBI agents were from the NE Miami Beach Office. She was
also interviewed by the DOJ OIG twice.
I fcaid they asked her if she could identify Atta's companions frpm pictures they were
holding. The FBI had pictures from some illegal aliens they were holding in CROM
(facility which holds illegal aliens in Miami area). She did not recognize them. They
asked her to describe Atta - what he looked like and what he was wearing - and if she
was willing to go under hypnosis which she agreed to but it never happened.
She was not interviewed by anyone from CPB or legacy INS. She was interviewed by
her port director, Mr. Garafano, and her supervisor.
On May 2 2001, she was detailed from Miami airport to the District Office located 7880
Biscayne Blvd., 5th Floor. Her supervisor asked her to help in the Deferred Office
because someone called in sick and they needed help.
11
Length of stay for Bis - standard length of stay. If they are here on business for 2, she
would give 3 weeks. She wouldn't use pre-made stamps, just write it in.
B2s
Mandatory 6 months - could not shorten that time - only supervisor could. She had
requested it in Miami a couple of instances, where person appeared to be intending
immigrant because they were here for 6 months, left for 2 days and returned...
Sometimes supervisor would make her change it back to more time.
Vocational students
I gave a year and one month.
II
DS (duration of status) - to give students to study English
Ml
Technical school- always a year and one month.
Janice asked if there was a port policy about referrals and how often it should happen,
't believe there was a port policy.
Fraud
Pre 9/11| [would look for fraud in visas with/ j She didn't check travel
stamps; most of the time in visas its\
Janice asked if there was someone on duty at the airport who had expertise in documents.
| [said yes.
Janice asked if she had much experience with Saudis or Egyptians, and! [replied
that at Miami you get everything. She said you are basically looking for people who are
staying and working here, criminals . . . I [said she has not gotten any TIPOFF hits
pre or post 9/11; she has gotten L,ookout hits. |
money they have with them, but ''she wouldn't count it in primary; she would if she was in
secondary. If she had a problem she would refef to secondary. She said her hands are
tied - supervisor would question why you want to limit stay if the person didn't overstay
last time. If she couldn't understand them because of language problem, she would get
refer to hard secondary where they could.get an interpreter. She would not process them
if she couldn't understand them. If they don't have visa or visa cancelled, refer to
supervisor. ;% i
..-• 19/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
Deferred Inspection . ; \e asked Barbara how deferred.inspection Worke
through airport and you run the person in the system and they have a record but no
judgment in the database, tie is asked to bring in his Judgment of Conviction records and
inspector can see - if someone has immigrant Ivisas and no pictures, they would be
deferred to bring in pictures. If someone needs more time because they are sick they are
deferred. Considered to be a continued inspection.
He was not deferred -he just walked off the: street - sometimes people who are close to 6
months and want more time - told no. ;
ATTA I
Janice stated that on May 2, 20011 Iwas detailed from 8:00 a.m. to the district
office and worked to approximately 3:00 p.m.
9/11 Law Enforcement Privacy
I Isaiditwas close to lunch time - about 1 l:30ish. Three guys came in and came
up to the counter. One of the 3 started asking questions about his friend - "both came in
on sarne day and we heed to get some information about his 1-94." I asked him if he was
the one that needs help; he said no -1 told him to sit down and I will help his friends. She
told them the person who needs help should sign in. Atta signed in (the guy who started
the conversation was not Atta). "this person who was a great looking kid - he didn't
look Arabic - Icjqked Caucasian. Atta said my friend and I came in on the same day and I
got .8 months and my friend only got 6 - my friend wants to get 8 months. I believe I
took both passports to see if they had valid visas. I Jsaid even if the visas were
expired, she couldn't dp .anything because they were already admitted.
change Atta's t6 6 months because he should not have gotten 8 months - only 6 months.
| jmade a notation on the tack of the 194 (1955 was her inspector number). She
said she had to backdate the I94..arid admit him on January 10 until July 9. | "jsaid
every time you change an 194 you have to write comments.
The 194 issued at Miarni by inspector] , f- the 194 issued in error: a new 194 was issued
at Deferred Inspection at the District Office ;n Miami.] jsaid she looked at the
original 194 and saw the stamp number.
She said if you look over admission stamps in the passport, you will not find her
inspector number because he had already been admitted.
said she didn't remember going through his entire passport. She said Atta didn't
say rriuch; he was quiet. She told him someone gave you the wrong admission and I'm
not giying your friend 8 months. When she asked her supervisor "it was wrong can I
change- it." Atta understood everything she said. She told them they could apply for an
: extension with forms downstairs. They said thank you and left.
Jsaid the whole encounter stuck in her mind because after they left she spoke to a
colleague and said that Atta was an ugly man "like a bulldog." She didn't remember
physical characteristics.
Janice if in\this case she looked at databases. | | said no because she didn't have
access to the district office's databases because she was only there for the day.j j
asked the inspector to put the information in the computer for her but he didn't. The top
of the 194 gets sent to Texas.
Janice said to| jthat she had said in a prior interview with DOJ IG that she saw an
194 that looked fraudulent.
)/ll Law Enforcement Privacy
I Laid she never said that. The second time they asked me to identify the 194 ...
"The one. I had - there were no corrections over it - it was just B2 -8 months."
Janice said let me read to you what it said in regard to Atta's 194 [read from
statement].
I jsaid when I gave him the 6 months, there was never an issue of whether he had a
fraudulent 194.
Janice said thai |told the FBIthere were 3 guys. She said yes. All 3 had same
skin tone, same features. The guy who made the initial conversation, about a year ago
the FBI was looking for some one named o'f| |said she called
her boss - apparently the FBI thought he worked with Atta - and he left the country. She
told Mr. Garafano -did not tell FBI - this man apparently was a legal resident, school
teacher in South Florida.
\Janicie\said for the record - the 194 with the] [stamp on it does not look familiar to
I fconfirmed she physically took out the old 194 and put the new one in his
passport..
DHS \e askecl labout what improvements she has/lias not noticed with the new
CBP. She said it was hard to say because immigration legacy INS is still doing
immigration work, and customs is still doing customs work; she doesn't know if it's
going to work - trying to do cross over - so much to learn -
Janice asked id mad trained in customs. She said very little. She said she works
mostly at private side of airport -Executive. She is back at Fort Lauderdale for about a
year and a half ago. She did Miami inspections through. November 2002 and returned to
i Ft. Lauderdale - customs and INS combined. Just an airport.
She said there are not a lot of foreign students going through Ft. Lauderdale so she
doesn't use SEVIS that much.
When some one comes through, you have to do customs, immigration and agriculture
inspections.
*********
Phone discussion March 29, 2004 re identification of Shukrijumah with Atta on May 2,
2001.
She states that Atta came in with two companions. One companion did not speak at all
and she does not recall his identity. (She recognized none of the hijackers, although she
thought al Shehhi looked familiar.) The other individual with Atta began the
conversation. After reviewing the fbi website at www.fbi.gov/terrorinto/adnan.htm. this
is what| | .had to say: "I'm 75 percent sure that this is the same guy,
Adnan G. El Shukrjumah.. He was clean cut, my skin complexion, looked Indian, like
me. I don't recall size or amount of facial hair, but dark. He spoke perfect English."
He initiated the conversation. "My friends have a question about their I-94s (arrival
records)." I asked him: "do you need to see immigration?" He said no. I said then go sit
down. He did. I didn't talk to him again.