Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
com
Section Sponsor
e-Alerts
Home
Sign Up for Free
News for Cops e-mail
Most Read Most E-mailed E-mail Article Print Article
Notifications
Jobs Central
Home > Law Enforcement Technology
Officer Forums
✔
Promo
Offers
Resources Taggers Beware: The Writing is on the
Job Updates
Wall
✔
Directory
✔ Daily News
Shop/Products
From the September 2005 Issue
✔
Officer
Magazines Down
By Douglas Page
Services Enter Email
Advertise In the United States the annual cost of graffiti abatement programs is Click to Go
estimated between $10 and $12 billion. In just the mass transit industry, the
Link/Bookmark cost of vandalism is growing by 11 percent a year, according to a survey
sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration.
Contact
In New York City alone, the average cost of removing graffiti increased from
$300,000 to $10 million between 1993 and 2003. The City of Las Vegas has
three full-time employees who remove graffiti by painting over it or blasting it
off with a power sprayer.
Graffiti removal can come with more than a monetary cost. A graffiti-removal
worker painting over a wall in the Boyle Heights area of Los Angeles was
fatally shot in June 2004 by a gunman who police believe was angry because
his gang tags were being covered.
Most cities fight graffiti with their paint brushes by quickly dispatching work
crews to slather a coat of fresh paint over tagger or gang scribblings. In doing
so they are also removing a valuable source of intelligence. One city in
California has found a way to exploit graffiti by establishing a tracking
program that empowers law enforcement and prosecutors to use this form of
street-level intelligence in court.
“It became clear that gangs were using graffiti to actually communicate,” he
says.
Kephart says publicity gang graffiti contains the name or abbreviation of the
gang’s name but does not include a threat, mark territory or have any
monikers listed. Publicity graffiti is the most frequent graffiti found in the
study, accounting for 47 percent of the analyzed images.
Roll call graffiti (26 percent) contains the gang name and a list of gang
monikers.
Sympathetic graffiti was the least observed (1 percent). Kephart says this
type of graffiti is put up to honor a slain gang member, usually in the form of
an RIP (rest in peace).
Each of these various types of graffiti can be useful to law enforcement and
prosecutors, according to Kephart.
Roll call graffiti can help prove gang membership when prosecutors are
seeking greater punishments of gang members through gang enhancements.
Territorial graffiti can assist law enforcement in determining which gangs are
expanding their boundaries. Publicity graffiti can be used when seeking gang
injunctions to prove that a gang has become a public nuisance. “Threatening
graffiti can be used to prove motive for murder or assault,” he says.
“Now, when an offender is caught putting up graffiti, they are not just charged
with one count of vandalism; they can be held accountable for all of the other
damage for which they are responsible,” Kephart says.
This has two main benefits. One, it sends a signal to the offenders that their
vandalism is being tracked. Two, a city can seek restitution from offenders for
all of the damage that they have committed, not merely a single incident.
Another advantage is that GAITS interfaces with GIS mapping software. “By
mapping a suspect’s graffiti, we can demonstrate a nexus between the
geographic location of the graffiti and the location of the offender’s residence,”
Kephart says.
This has been used successfully in the course of securing search warrants of
gang members’ residences. During the course of the search it is common not
only to find instruments of the crime but also additional graffiti at the
offender’s residence. This graffiti can then be matched in style to the graffiti
stored in the GAITS program.
“After using those locations to limit the suspect pool, we came up with our
suspect,” Rogers says. “Concerned citizens confirmed who the vandal was,
and we obtained and executed a search warrant on his house, which turned
up many graffiti tools, photos of his graffiti damage and a listing of many of
the locations he vandalized outside of the Carson area.”
As a result, he was charged with felony vandalism and plead guilty. In fact,
every graffiti case filed by the Carson district attorney has resulted in a guilty
verdict.
Rogers says what makes this program different is the close collaboration with
law enforcement. “We have had several programs in the past that have
tracked graffiti; however, they were rendered meaningless due to a lack of
law enforcement follow-up,” Rogers says.
“The bottom line is that we are now able to respond on a sustained basis to
graffiti issues throughout our city,” Rogers says.
Douglas Page writes about science and technology from Pine Mountain,
California. To contact him, e-mail douglaspage@earthlink.net.
Submit a comment