Close Print

FW: Character and Fitness, Kevin Kelly, Pete

Christiansen, Patrice Eichman
From: Zach Coughlin (zachcoughlin@hotmail.com)
Sent: Wed 10/31/12 12:57 PM
To: fflaherty@dlpfd.com (fflaherty@dlpfd.com)
1 attachment
combined collection of materials for State Bar of Nevada Grievance
against Peter Christiansen, Kevin Kelly, Michael Sanft, Patrice
Eichman, etc adobe 4 and later grey revised to be smaller.pdf (10.8
MB)
Dear President Flaherty,
Can I get a case number for this matter, I have not heard anything about it in forever. I also, I would like
to file a grievance or Complaint against Bar Counsel Pat King and NNDB Chairman Susich for failing to
follow the June 7th, 2012 Order of the Nevada Supreme Court and SCR 111(7)-(8), in addition to SCR
102(4)(d). Under the Ching or Chang decision, the SBN is the "complainant" and wit respect to these
matters, wherein I allege misconduct by Peter Christiansen, Character and Fitness Chairman Kevin Kelly,
Esq. and others, the SBN has not known about these matters for more than 4 years. Further, King refuses
to undertake any investigation against Richard G. Hill, Esq., Judge Nash Holmes, Casey Baker, any of the
RMC "court appointed defenders" (like Loomis, Puentes, Taitel, Sotelo) or WCPD's Leslie, Goodnight,
Dogan, or Bosler. Now, King is trying to jam me into a combo hearing on November 14th, 2012 in his
ng12-0205 ng12-0434, and ng12-0434 scr 105 complaint, which impermissilby seeks to skirt scr 111(7)-(8)
vis a vis King's SCR 111 petition in 60838 (please see my filings in that regard).
Furhter, the "courthouse sanctuary" rule makes the RMC Marshal Harley's conduct in personally serving
me notice of an Order to Show Cause Hearing in the appeal of the eviction matter in cv11-03628 (Richard
HIll got me evicted from my former home law office) on behalf of WCSO Deputy Machen (whom HIll
hired to serve it despit the Caplow decision making clear that is not even required...basically, its wrong
to have the RMC Marshal barge in to my plea bargaining session with city attorney ormaas on february
27th, 2012 incident to the traffic citations in 11 tr 26800 that the rpd gave me at hill's office when I went to
get my wallet, key's, drivers license, and client's files from hill after being released from a fraudulent
custodial arrest for criminal trespass at my former home law office in a criminal complaint signed by hill,
judge nash holmes held that 11 tr 26800 trial later that day, despite her apparent admission that she was
made aware by the wcpd and or wcpd biray dogan that an order for competency evaluation had been
entered respecting me on 2/27/12 at 1:31 pm and nrs 178.405 and nrs 5.010 shoudl have prevented judge
nash holmes from holding that trial, and In re Oliver (us supreme court case requiring sixth amendment
right to council in cases like 11 tr 26800 where Judge Nash Holmes convicted me of "summary criminal
contempt" despite her order resting upon alleged conduct outside her presence, in a bathroom stall that
she alleged in her 3/ 12/12 hearing in that matter an RMC Marshall witnessed by peering through a
bathroom stall I was in where "dissassemblign a smartphone" or some nonsense like that peeping tom
crap...RMC Harley was serving an Order to Show Cause on behalf of WCSO Deputy Machen (who didn't
want to wait around to serve me it....just like on 11/1/11 when machen didn't want to follow the law in
serving me the eviction order, and instead filed a false affidavit attesting to personal service, then
conducted a lockout using a stale or invalid eviction order when I was not present, only to attest to
having "personally served" me..
This is a mess, the SBN doesn't have jack on me (give me my hearing under the court's 6/7/12 order for
the "sole purpose" of determingin my punishment over the "walmart candy bar" petty larceny
conviction, which I completely showed to lack due process (dismissing appeals for failure to cite to a
transcript where the rmc is breaking the law in not preparing the transcript? i proved perjury by all the
city's witnesses, and prosecutorial misconduct, clearly)....then the criminal trespass conviction is so
flawed its unbelievably. the judge was the brother of the family court judge garnder who got me fired
from washoe legal services, and the brother passed her sanction order to judge nash holmes who passes
it to the sbn, and it becomes ng12-0435, but sbn king doesn't want to admit that that is how he got it?
and the brother judge gardner refuses to recuse himself from that criminal trespass case rmc 11 cr 26405,
despit my filing mandamus against his sister's order in 54844 and despite his sister's order being a bar
grievance against me, submitted by judge holmes, on behalf of the brother judge gardner and all the
other rmc judges? and the rmc "loses" my n otice of appeal an it gets dismissed in cr12-1262 by the same
judge elliot of d10 whom put me in jail between 4/19 and 4/26/12 impermissibly based upon lies by the
competency evaluators and a motion by dda young that violated nrs 178.405's mandatory stay? and
during that incarceration richard hill's $40k attorneys fees motion against me in the eviction cv11-03628 is
filed, which flanagan ultimately awarded?
the sbn is gambling a large chunk of yours and its reputation on a bunch of asinine arrest by the rpd, and
extremely suspect co-signing of richard hill's bullshit this year by people who should know better.
Sincerely,
Zach Coughlin
PO BOX 3961
Reno, NV 89505
Tel 775 338 8118
Fax 949 667 7402
ZachCoughlin@hotmail.com
From: zachcoughlin@hotmail.com
To: patrickk@nvbar.org; davidc@nvbar.org; glennm@nvbar.org
Subject: Character and Fitness, Kevin Kelly, Pete Christiansen, Patrice Eichman
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:48:17 -0700
Dear Bar Counsel,
I write respectfully asking an inquiry be conducted into whether Kevin Kelly
indicated at my June 2002 hearing that 3 pro bono attorney's name would be
provided to me, but that only one was, Peter S. Christiansen, and that, despite
Christiansen saying he was doing my case on a pro bono basis, he was paid at
least $5,000, and pretty much the only work he or his office did was attend the
June 2002 hearing, and that Christiansen and Kelly are very, very close, and
that they sent me to a psychologist who specializes in gambling addictions (I
have never really even gambled) who cost approximately another
$2,000....Then Ms. Eichman failed to submit my application for admission or
my Request For Reconsideration (sent to her and Christiansen's office on
September 15th, 2003, as confirmed by my fax records, in additional to being
mailed to them) to the Nevada Supreme Court. There are numerous other
issues that deserve a grievance there, including whether Christiansen
supervised the newly licensed Sanft in any way, whether a writing wherein I
addressed alcoholism was forward to the Bar despite the express dictate that it
not be, whether second Consent Agreement sent to the Christiasens on
9/27/04 was ever forwarded to the Bar. Additionally, Mike Rowe wrote very
stern letters to me basically telling me not to follow up on things, whereupon
my attorney's and Ms. Eichman failed to follow up on things, essentially tying
my hands in the matter. I intend to supplement this grievance with additional
matters soon, but wish it to begin now.
Sincerely,
Zach Coughlin
Zach Coughlin, Esq., 1422 E. 9th St. #2, RENO, NV 89512, tel: 775 338 8118, fax: 949 667 7402;
ZachCoughlin@hotmail.com Nevada Bar No: 9473