Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 10

116

8 Cable Systems

0.20 0.18 0.16 3


1 x 1 (W km )

6 8

0.14 4 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.06 10 2

1 15 25 35 50 70 95120 185 q (mm2) 500

Figure 8.3 Inductive reactances (positivesequence component) of three-phase cables. 1, 0.6/1 kV, four-core cable, NKBA; 2, 0.6/1 kV, four-core cable, NA2XY; 3 three-core cable with armoring 10 kV; 4, PVC-insulated cable 6/10 kV, NYFGbY; 5, VPE-insulated cable

6/10 kV, NA2XSEY; 6, single-core oil-lled cable 110 kV, triangle formation; 7, singlecore oil-lled cable 110 kV, at formation; 8, XLPE-insulated 110 kV triangle formation; 9, XLPE-insulated cable 110 kV at formation, distance 15 cm.

of the cable concerned. For this reason, measurements of the impedances in the zero-sequence component should be carried out during commissioning and in high-voltage systems should be repeated at intervals of at most some years.

8.4 Losses and Permissible Current 8.4.1 General

The permissible current of cables is determined by maximal permissible temperature of the cable insulation, which should not be exceeded at any time so as to protect the insulation against deterioration. Table 8.4 indicates the maximal permissible temperatures of insulating materials. Cable losses originate from current-dependent losses in conductor, metallic sheath, coatings, screens and armoring and possibly in outer metal tubes as well as from current-independent losses in the dielectricum of the cable insulation. These losses heat the individual parts of the cable construction and must be trans-

8.4 Losses and Permissible Current


Table 8.4 Maximal permissible temperature of cable insulation.

117

Cable type

Maximal permissible temperature (C) Operating temperature Copper conductor 90 70 70 80 80 70 65 60 65 Aluminum conductor 90 70 70 80 80 70 65 60 65 At end of short-circuit

Cable with soft-soldered joints VPE and XLPE insulation PVC insulation 300 mm2 >300 mm2 Oil-impregnated insulation 0.6/1 kV 3.6/6 kV 6/10 kV 12/20 kV 18/30 kV Electric eld-limited insulation 12/20 kV VPE and XLPE insulation PVC insulation 300 mm2 >300 mm2 Oil-impregnated insulation 0.6/1 kV 3.6/6 kV 6/10 kV 12/20 kV 18/30 kV Electric eld-limited insulation 12/20 kV

160 250 160 140 250 170 170 170 150 170 250 160 140 250 170 170 170 150 170

ferred through the different layers to the surrounding soil, or to the surrounding air if laid in air. Generally one starts from the thermal equivalent diagram as shown in Figure 8.4. The maximal permissible current is calculated by Equation 8.1. = T Ptot with = temperature difference T = thermal resistance Ptot = losses. The different types of losses are to be determined in detail. Based on the knowledge of the thermal resistances of the cable construction and the surrounding soil
(8.1)

118

8 Cable Systems

Ohmic conductor losses PVL Dielectric losses PVD Thermal resistance of insulation TIs Sheet losses PVM Thermal resistance of inner sheath TSi Armor losses PVB Thermal resistance of outer sheath TSa

Ji
M

Surface area of cable Thermal resistance of surroundingTU

Ja

Unaffected surrounding
U

= a + i
Figure 8.4 Thermal equivalent diagram for cables.

or air, either the temperatures at individuals layers in the cable for given load current or the maximal permissible current for given temperatures can be calculated.
8.4.2 Calculation of Losses

Cable losses consist of two parts, current-dependent and current-independent losses. Losses of the conductor are given by Equation 8.2. PVL = I 2 R20 [1 + ( L 20 C)]FS FP with R20 = DC resistance per unit length at 20 C I = conductor current = temperature coefcient L = conductor temperature in C FS = factor of skin effect (to be considered with cross-sections above 185 mm2) FP = factor of proximity effect (to be considered with cross-sections above 185 mm2). Methods for calculation of the factors of skin effect and proximity effect are outlined in [23, 24], denoted there by yS and yP. Losses in a steel pipe considered as outside casing are taken into account by adjusted factors for skin effect and
(8.2)

8.4 Losses and Permissible Current

119

proximity effect. Depending upon the arrangement of the cable cores in the pipe and the presence of armoring, the losses in the steel pipe can amount up 70% of the losses by skin and proximity effects [23]. The calculation of the resistance per unit length considering the skin and proximity effect is valid up to cable cross-sections of 1500 mm2 (copper conductors) and up to 2000 mm2 (aluminum conductors). For larger cross-sections and for large hollow conductors, additional considerations are needed [23]. Losses occur also in screens, sheaths and armoring due to eddy-current and longitudinal currents and are likewise current-dependent. In the case of magnetic materials, as used in pressure bandages and in metallic casings and pipes, magnetization losses arise. The losses in sheaths and screens depend strongly on the kind of earthing of sheaths and screens. With earthing at one end, no longitudinal current can ow and the losses are accordingly small; with earthing at both ends, the losses in sheaths and screens can be up to 40% of the total losses of the cable depending on the conductor cross-section [23]. If sheaths are cross-bonded, that is, the sheath is grounded at the beginning, at the end and with one-third and two-thirds of the length with cyclic exchange of the sheath sections, the sheath losses are reduced to an insignicant part of the total losses. In practice, an exact cross-bonding of the sheaths (at each third of the cable length) usually cannot be realized; the sheath currents of the three length sections do not compensate themselves completely and the sheath losses are higher in this case. The sheath losses by longitudinal currents are taken into and the eddy-current losses by a factor 1 as multiples of account by a factor 1 the conductor losses according to Equation 8.3a. PVM = PVL (1 + 1 )
(8.3a)

The detailed procedure for the calculation of losses by Equation 8.3a is outlined in [23, 24]. If the cross-bonding locations of the cable system are not exactly known should be assumed to in the planning and design stage, the respective factor 1 = 0.05 for cables be 1 = 0.03 for cables buried directly in the ground and 1 buried in pipes and ducts. Longitudinal current losses and eddy-current losses in armoring and steel for the losses by tubes are considered in a similar way by the factors 2 longitudinal current and 2 for the eddy-current losses according to Equation 8.3b. PVB = PVL ( 2 + 2 )
(8.3b)

The detailed procedure for the calculation of losses by Equation 8.3b can be found in [23, 24]. The current-independent dielectric losses depend on the dissipation factor tan and on the capacitance of the cable C1 (positive-sequence component) and can be calculated with Equations 8.4 and 8.5.

120

8 Cable Systems

PVD = C1 C1 =

Un tan 3

(8.4)

2 0 r d ln I dL

(8.5)

with 0 = permittivity (0 = 8.8 542 1012 A s V1m1) r = relative permittivity (see Table 8.3) dI = outer diameter of insulation dL = conductor diameter. For detailed analysis, the thermal dependence of the dissipation factor tan has also to be considered.
8.4.3 Soil Characteristics

The determination of the heat dissipation to the surrounding soil requires knowledge of the thermal characteristics (temperature and thermal conductivity) of the soil. The temperature of the soil changes with laying depth, yearly seasonal changes, the mean air temperature and the type of surface (grass, bitumen, concrete). The mean monthly soil temperature for Central European conditions is outlined in Figure 8.5. The temperature of a grass-covered earth surface corresponds approximately to the ambient air in the respective period. If the surface is sealed with bitumen, the temperature of the earth surface varies in a wide range, summer season having far higher and winter season lower temperatures. As can be seen in Figure. 8.6, the soil temperature at depths larger than 34 m is nearly constant at 10 C; typically no cables are laid in this depth. Figure 8.6 indicates the seasonal variation of soil temperature under grasscovered surfaces in Central Europe in different depths [25]. It can be observed that the soil temperature follows a sine function similar to that of the solar radiation with a time delay of several weeks depending on the depths. At larger depth the maximum soil temperature is lower and at 10 m depth is roughly constant at 8.510 C. The thermal conductivity of the soil depends on the water content of the soil, expressed by the humidity content m, and on the porosity G (the ratio of cavity volume to the total volume). For conditions surrounding cables those types of soil are desirable which consist of consolidated sand and sandgravel mixtures with at grain distributions, as the ne sand portions ll up the cavities between the coarser constituents. A loam proportion of 10% leads to a lower drainage of the soil, improves the compressibility of the soil and increases the heat conductivity. Figure 8.7 indicates the thermal conductivity of sandy soil as function of the temperature and of the humidity content m. It is assumed that the humidity content

8.4 Losses and Permissible Current


Soil temperature (C)
-2 0 0.25 0.50 January 0.75 November August 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22

121

Depth (m)

1.00 March 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25

May September

Soil temperature (C)


-2 0 0.25 0.50 0.75 January March November 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 May June September 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

Depth (m)

1.00

Figure 8.5 Mean soil temperature in Central Europe as a function of the soil depth [22]. (a) Grass covered; (b) sealed with bitumen.

m of sandy soils at depth greater 1 m remains above 25% even after long periods of suppressed rehumidication, for example, when the surface has been sealed. The thermal conductivity of different soils as function of the saturation factor h is outlined in Figure 8.8.

122

8 Cable Systems
20

15

Surface

1m

Soil temperature (C)

2m 10 4m 10 m

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53

-5

Week of the year

Figure 8.6 Seasonal changes of the soil temperature under grass-covered surfaces in Central Europe at different laying depths.

2.2 2.0 1.8

l (W K1 m1)

1.6 1.4

0.24 0.08 0.04 m 0.03 0.02

1.2

1.0 0.8 0.6

10

20

30
Temperature (C)

40

50

60

Figure 8.7 Thermal conductivity of sandy soil as a function of temperature and humidity content m [26].

The thermal conductivity remains constant within the range up to h < 0.25 for thermally stabilized sandy soils and h < 0.5 for loam soils. These gures characterize the range of the dried soil. Soil drying is to be attributed to the temperature eld in the ground with a dened temperature gradient, which is related to the humidity gradient depending on the type of soil. Each isotherm corresponds to a

8.4 Losses and Permissible Current


2.5

123

2.0
Thermally stabilized soil

l (W K1 m1)

1.5
Sandy soil

1.0
Clay soil

0.5

0 0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4 0.5 0.6 Saturation factor h

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

Figure 8.8 Thermal conductivity of different soils as a function of the saturation factor h [27].

dened humidity content. If the temperature exceeds a limit value, characteristic for each type of ground, the rehumidication of the soil is insufcient to compensate for the drying by evaporation, drainage and water transportation; consequently the soil dries out completely. A critical temperature for soil drying can be assigned to this humidity content, which is dependent on the soil type, the soil temperature, the humidity content of the unimpaired soil and the load and/or the load cycles of the buried cable. The thermal conductivity of the soil remains constant below the critical humidity content. Based on Figures 8.7 and 8.8, thermal conductances of the ground can be assumed as outlined below:

Thermally stabilized sandy soil: during soil drying: Sandy soil: during soil drying: Loamy soil: during soil drying:
8.4.4 Thermal Resistances of Cables

= 1.82.2 W K1m1 = 1.1 W K1m1 = 1.01.5 W K1m1 = 0.5 W K1m1 = 0.91.1 W K1m1 = 0.25 W K1m1.

For the calculation of the maximal permissible loading (current), the thermal resistances of the cable and/or the individual layers of the cable such as conductor, insulation, screens, sheaths, coating and so on need to be known. Reliable data can only be given by the manufacturer and should be required in detail in each specication. Values for typical materials used in the cable construction and of given laying conditions are shown in Table 8.5.

124

8 Cable Systems
Table 8.5 Typical thermal parameters of materials used in cable construction and laying material [23].

Material

Thermal resistance (Km W1)

Thermal capacity 106 W s K1m3 2.0 2.4 1.7 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.7 2.0 2.4 2.0 2.2 2.0 1.7 2.4

Paper insulation VPE, XLPE and PE insulation PVC insulation (depending on voltage) Butyl-rubber and rubber insulation Fiber and textile coatings Rubber protective layers Polychloroprene layers and coatings PVC protective layers PVC/bitumen on Al-coatings PE protective coatings Concrete Glass ber Stone materials PVC covers PE covers

5.06.5 3.5 5.06.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.5 5.06.0 6.0 3.5 1.0 4.8 1.2 7.0 3.5

8.4.5 Calculation according to VDE 0276-1000

Calculation of maximal permissible loading is described in VDE 0276-1000 for cables with rated voltages up to 30 kV. One proceeds from standardized laying arrangement, soil surrounding conditions and operating cycles that are typical in power systems of public utilities and in industry. The application of VDE 02761000 is subject to the following conditions: Cables of the same type are assumed in one trench. Cables of same rated voltage are assumed in the trench. Cables of the same loading conditions and load cycles are assumed. Only standardized cable types are included. Only standard laying arrangements are considered. Electrically parallel operated cable systems are not considered. Sheaths are assumed to be earthed on both sides. No external heat sources are assumed. Temporary overloading of the cables is not considered.

Operating and laying conditions deviating from standard conditions as in Table 8.6 are considered in VDE 0276-1000 with factors f1 and f2. The maximal permissible current is found from Equation 8.6. Izul = I r f 1 f 2 f
(8.6)

8.4 Losses and Permissible Current


Table 8.6 Standard conditions for the determination of the

125

maximal permissible loading of cables in earth according to VDE 0276-1000. Standard operating and trench conditions for the calculation of rated current Operation mode (Section 5.3.1.1 of VDE 0276-1000) load factor m = 0.7; peak load for laying in earth Laying conditions (Section 5.3.1.2 of VDE 02761000) Laying depth 0.7 m Formation 1 multiple-core cable 1 single-core cable (DC system) 3 single-core cables (AC system), triangle formation 3 single-core cables (AC system) at formation, distance between cables 7 cm Bedding in sand or relled soil Protective covering from concrete tiles or at plastic plates Deviation in operating conditions

Reduction factors according to Tables 4 to 9 of VDE 0276-1000 See Section 5.3.1.2.1 of VDE 0276-1000

Reduction factors Multiple cable trench as per Tables 4, 5, 9 and 13 of VDE 0276-1000 Multiple cable trench as per Tables 4 to 7 of VDE 0276-1000 Multiple cable trench as per Tables 4, 5 and 8 of VDE 0276-1000 Reduction factors For protective covering with air inclusions see Section 5.3.1.2.3 of VDE 0276-1000 For protective pipes see Section 5.3.1.2.4 of VDE 0276-1000 Reduction factors As per Tables 4 to 9 of VDE 0276-1000 As per Tables 4 to 9 of VDE 0276-1000 See Section 5.2 of VDE 0276-1000

Trench surrounding (Section 5.3.1.3 of VDE 0276-1000) Soil temperature in laying depth: 20 C Specic thermal resistivity of soil Wet areas: 1.0 Km W1 Dry areas: 2.5 Km W1

Earthing of sheaths, screens and armoring at both ends

with Ir = permissible current for standard conditions f = Product of other conversion factors, for example, for laying in pipes and ducts. The calculation method according to VDE 0276-1000 is based on the characteristic diameter, which depends on the energy loss factor as per Equation 8.7, see also Section 4.2.