Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
N O T E S
1. Cf. Foucaults Archaeology of Knowledge (1972) on the discursive construction of epis-
temic objects.
2. Cf. Stuart Halls (1980) early theoretical contextualization of cultural studies.
3. Hardt and Negri (2000, 45) formulate a similar critique of the local/global distinction:
It is false, in any case, to claim that we can re(establish) local identities that are in
some sense outside and protected against the global ows of capital and Empire.
4. Although I fully agree with Hardt and Negris (2000) critique of the local/global
dichotomy, I do not follow their suggestion to introduce the new dichotomy of the
Ur s St he l i 19
empire and the multitude. Instead, I will argue that we have to think the impossibility
of the global, thus avoiding Hardt and Negris ontological and substantialist gesture.
5. Cf. Kneer and Nassehi (1997) for an accessible German introduction, and William
Rasch (2000) on modernity and systems theory.
6. The only outside of the world is the nonsocial. In Luhmanns terms, it is the limit of
communication that denes the limit of the world. For Luhmann, this boundary
between communication (i.e., the social) and noncommunication (i.e., the nonsocial) is
absolutely clear (Luhmann 1997, 151). This is certainly a highly problematic assump-
tion, since it presupposes that the materiality of communication can be easily sepa-
rated from the process of communication (Stheli 2000).
7. Cf. Hardt and Negri (2000, 31, 34) who also argue that the empire has lost an outside,
making it impossible to criticize it from a standpoint that is not always already within
the empire.
8. Cf. Luhmann (1991) on blind spots and paradoxes.
9. To be more precise, systems theory speaks here about Entparadoxierung, i.e., the
process of solving paradoxes without ever arriving at a complete solution (Luhmann
1991; Stheli 2000).
10. Cf. Tagg (1991) for a short but very interesting suggestion to think globalization along
the lines of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffes post-foundationalist theory of hege-
mony.
11. This is precisely the moment of the political, as it has been described by Derrida and
Laclau and Mouffe (1985; Laclau 1996): It is a radical moment of undecidability, where
the resources of the system do not sufce to resolve this undecidability.
12. The local/global distinction changes its outline as soon as we take seriously the prem-
ise that space itself becomes an eventa process of unfolding and splaying out (Doel
1999, 7).
13. One might speak of a transimmanence (Nancy 1997, 55) in order to account for this
strange status of the outside. The idea of transimmanence avoids doing away fully with
the idea of an outsideas, for example, in Hardt and Negris (2000) concept of imma-
nence.
R E F E R E N C E S
Ang, Ien. 1998. Doing Cultural Studies at the Crossroads: Local/Global Negotiations. European
Journal of Cultural Studies 1: 1333.
Appadurai, Arjun. 1998. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press.
Blair, Tony, and Gerhard Schrder. 1999. Europe: The Third Way/Die Neue Mitte. Available online
at www.spd-bruessel.de/dokumente/Schroeder-Blair-engl.html (cited May 2002).
The Out s i de of t he Gl oba l 20
Brecher, Jeremy, Tim Costello, and Brendan Smith. 2002. Globalization from Below: The Power of
Solidarity. Cambridge, Mass.: Southend Press.
Cullenberg, Stephen. 1996. Althusser and the Decentering of the Marxist Totality. In Postmodern
Materialism and the Future of Marxist Theory, edited by A. Callari and D. F. Ruccio.
Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Felix Guattari. 1988. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia.
London: Athlone Press.
Denning, Michael. 2001. Globalization in Cultural Studies: Process and Epoch. European Journal
of Cultural Studies 4 (3): 35164.
Dirlik, Arif. 1996. The Global in the Local. In Global/Local: Cultural Production and the
Transnational Imaginary, edited by R. Wilson and W. Dissanayake. Durham, N.C.: Duke
University Press.
Doel, Marcus. 1999. Poststructuralist Geographies: The Diabolical Art of Spatial Science.
Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
During, Simon. 1997. Popular Culture on a Global Scale: A Challenge for Cultural Studies?
Critical Inquiry 23: 80833.
Fiske, John. 1987. Television Culture. London: Routledge.
. 1994 [1989]. Reading the Popular. London: Routledge.
Foucault, Michel. 1972. Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon.
Hall, Stuart. 1980 [1973]. Encoding/Decoding. In Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in
Cultural Studies, 197279, edited by the Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies.
London: Hutchinson.
. 1980. Cultural Studies: Two Paradigms. Media, Culture, and Society 2: 5772.
. 1991. The Local and the Global: Globalization and Ethnicity. In Culture, Globalization,
and the World-System, edited by A. D. King. London: Macmillan.
Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Kneer, Georg, and Armin Nassehi. 1997. Niklas Luhmanns Theorie sozialer Systeme: Eine
Einfhrung. Mnchen: Fink.
Knorr-Cetina, Karin, ed. 1981. Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an
Integration of Micro- and Macrosociologies. Boston: Routledge.
Krishnan, Raghu, and B. Skanthakumar. 2001. Globalization and its Discontents. Available
online at www.redag.org.uk/canada/global.html (cited May 2002).
Laclau, Ernesto. 1981. La Politique comme construction de limpensable. In Materialits dis-
cursives, edited by B. Conein et al. Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille.
. 1990. New Reections on the Revolution of Our Time. London: Verso.
. 1996. Emancipation(s). London: Verso.
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.
Luhmann, Niklas. 1991. Sthenographie und Euryalistik. In Paradoxien, Dissonanzen, Zusam-
menbrche, edited by H. U. Gumbrecht and L. K. Pfeiffer. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
Ur s St he l i 21
. 1997. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. 2 vols. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
Morley, David. 1980. The Nationwide Audience: Structure and Decoding. London: British Film
Institute.
Nancy, Jean-Luc. 1997. The Sense of the World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
. 2002. La Cration du monde ou la mondialisation. Paris: Galile.
Prigogine, Ilya, and Isabelle Stengers. 1984. Order out of Chaos: Mans New Dialogue with Nature.
New York: Bantam.
Rasch, William. 2000. Niklas Luhmanns Modernity: The Paradoxes of Differentiation. Stanford,
Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Robertson, Roland. 1992. Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. London: Sage.
Schmid, Hans Bernhard. 1997. Europa und die Weltgesellschaft: Zur systemtheoretischen
Kritik der transzendentalen Phnomenologie. Soziale Systeme 3: 27188.
Stheli, Urs. 2000. Sinnzusammenbrche: Eine dekonstruktive Lektre von Niklas Luhmanns
Systemtheorie. Weilerswist: Velbrck.
. 2003. Figures of the Limit. In Laclau: A Critical Reader, edited by S. Critchley and O.
Marchart. London/New York: Routledge. Forthcoming.
Staten, Henry. 1984. Wittgenstein and Derrida. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Stichweh, Rudolf. 2000. Die Weltgesellschaft: Soziologische Analysen. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
Stratton, Jon, and Ien Ang. 1996. On the Impossibility of a Global Cultural Studies: British
Cultural Studies in an International Frame. In Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in
Cultural Studies, edited by D. Morley and K. H. Chen. London: Routledge.
Tagg, John. 1991. Globalization, Totalization, and the Discursive Field. In Culture, Globalization,
and the World-System, edited by A. D. King. London: Macmillan.
Tsonis, Anastasios A. 1992. Chaos: From Theory to Application. New York: Plenum Press.
Wastell, Sari. 2001. Presuming Scale, Making Diversity: On the Mischiefs of Measurement and
the Global: Local Metonymy in Theories of Law and Culture. Critique of Anthropology
21 (2), 185210.
Wilson, Rob, and Wimal Dissanayake, eds. 1996. Global/Local: Cultural Production and the
Transnational Imaginary. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
The Out s i de of t he Gl oba l 22