UNIVERSITY OF SAINT LOUIS Tuguegarao City COLLEGE OF TOURISM AND TECHNICAL-VOCATIONAL EDUCATION ***Standard Rubrics for (Emgt.

) Convention and Events Management

FOR MEMBERS/LEADERS

Attendance: (Two components: Attendance and Punctuality during meetings) 20 15 10 5 0 Tardiness 10 No Tardiness 7 1 Tardiness 5 2 Tardiness 3 3 Tardiness 1 4 Tardiness ** To compute, the percentage under the attendance, the scores of the two components will be added. Then, it will be divided by 30 and will be multiplied by 10%. Perfect attendance 1 Absence 2 Absences 3 Absences 4 Absences

In assignments and activities: For every week, facilitators and head committees must assess the level of participation of students. ** To compute, get the summation of the scores of the students from week 1 to the last week of each grading period. Then divide it by the total score, eventually multiply it by 20% to get the equivalent percentage. The following are the standard rubrics: 30 25 20 18 17 16 15 0 Very Commendable. Showed initiative/leadership. Demonstrated full participation. Doesnt need to be supervised. Encouraged others to work. Commendable. Showed initiative. Demonstrated full participation. Doesnt need to be supervised. Moderately Commendable. Showed initiative. More of a follower than a leader. Demonstrated full participation. Very Satisfactory. Slightly showed initiative. Needed not to be supervised. Demonstrated participation. Satisfactory. Showed initiative. Demonstrated participation. Sometimes needs to be supervised. Moderately Satisfactory. Showed initiative. Demonstrated participation. Needed to be supervised. Fair. Often causes trouble or disturbance. Participates when supervised. None. Member/Leader is unavailable and absent

In Recitation: For every meeting the Instructor must assess the level of participation of students in class. ** To compute, get the summation of the scores of the students from the 1st meeting to the last meeting of each grading period. Then divide it by the total score, eventually multiply it by 5% to get the equivalent percentage. The following are the standard rubrics: Verbal Behavior Pattern 30 Assertive. The student use direct and unambiguous language, No attributions or evaluations of others behavior, use of I statements and cooperative we statements. 20 Aggressive. The student use swear words or abusive language, attributions and evaluations of others behavior, sexist or racist terms, explicit threats or putdown 10 Nonassertive. The student use qualifier words such as (maybe, kind of) Fillers (uh, you know, well) Negaters (its not really that important, Im not sure) In Quizzes: For every meeting/week the Instructor must assess the level of competency through skills and knowledge. ** To compute, get the summation of the scores of the students from the 1st quiz to the last quiz of each grading period. Then divide it by the total score, eventually multiply it by 15% to get the equivalent percentage.

Grading System: Criteria in grading Class Standing (50%) Quizzes Assignments/Activities Recitation Attendance 15% 20% 5% 10% 50% 100% 15% 20% 5% 10% 50% 100% 15% 20% 5% 10% 50% 100% Prelims Midterms Finals

Major Examination Total:

In summary, the students are required to initiate a Co-Curricular Academic Outreach undertaking in form of a community event which will highlight activities that are considered owned by the College of Tourism. Students will use volunteer services that often produce a range of benefits including engendering pride in the school, strengthening a feeling of belonging and creating a sense of place. Through this event, students can also help to expose people to new ideas and experiences, encourage participation in different activities, and encourage tolerance and diversity as part of community and cultural development strategies in the Hospitality and Tourism Industry. Recommending Approval: Approved by:

MA. SHERELYN S. TAMA, MSHRM

ALICIA S. TULIAO, MBE

HTM Department Head

Academic Dean UNIVERSITY OF SAINT LOUIS Tuguegarao City

COLLEGE OF TOURISM AND TECHNICAL-VOCATIONAL EDUCATION

***Standard Rubrics in Business Research in Hospitality and Tourism Industry

FOR MEMBERS/LEADERS

Attendance: (Two components: Attendance and Punctuality during meetings) 20 15 10 5 0 Tardiness 10 No Tardiness 7 1 Tardiness 5 2 Tardiness 3 3 Tardiness 1 4 Tardiness ** To compute, the percentage under the attendance, the scores of the two components will be added. Then, it will be divided by 30 and will be multiplied by 10%. Perfect attendance 1 Absence 2 Absences 3 Absences 4 Absences

In workshops (Assignments and Activities): For every week, the research promoter and the leader must assess the level of participation of members. ** To compute, get the summation of the scores of the students from week 1 to the last week of each grading period. Then divide it by the total score, eventually multiply it by 25% to get the equivalent percentage. The following are the standard rubrics: For Members 30 25 20 18 17 16 Very Commendable. Showed initiative/leadership. Demonstrated full participation. Doesnt need to be supervised. Encouraged others to work. Commendable. Showed initiative. Demonstrated full participation. Doesnt need to be supervised. Moderately Commendable. Showed initiative. More of a follower than a leader. Demonstrated full participation. Very Satisfactory. Slightly showed initiative. Needed not to be supervised. Demonstrated participation. Satisfactory. Showed initiative. Demonstrated participation. Sometimes needs to be supervised. Moderately Satisfactory. Showed initiative. Demonstrated participation. Needed to be supervised.

15 0

Fair. Often causes trouble or disturbance. Participates when supervised. None. Member/Leader is unavailable and absent

For Leaders: 30 25 20 18 17 16 15 0 Very Commendable. Showed initiative and leadership. Demonstrate full responsibility in the group. Encourage, influence and shows changing behavior for others to work. Commendable. The leader is charismatic and visionary. Very understanding in using power and influence. Runs productive meetings. Moderately Commendable. Acts decisively. Put members first. He knows the paper, responds to and writes with his/her followers. Knows what things to be done. Very Satisfactory. The leader makes productive contributions through good work habits. Satisfactory. The leader builds greatness through personal humility and professional will. Moderately Satisfactory. The leader is unable to deliver on, implement the objectives of the paper due to incompetence or bad intentions Fair. The leader is unable to deliver on, due to incompetence and a lack of follow through commitment. None. The leader under lead and tends to write the paper alone. Treats the members like other resources or numbers only.

In Recitation: For every meeting the Research promoter must assess the level of participation of students in class. ** To compute, get the summation of the scores of the students from the 1st feed backing to the last feed backing of each grading period. Then divide it by the total score, eventually multiply it by 15% to get the equivalent percentage. The following are the standard rubrics: I. FOR INDIVIDUAL LEVEL Communication styles (5%) 30 20 10 Communication competent. The student has the ability to effectively use communication behaviors in a given context. Assertive style. The student is expressive and self enhancing, pushes hard without attacking; permits others to influence outcome and self-enhancing without intruding others. Aggressive. The student takes advantage of others; expressive and selfenhancing at others expense.

II. Nonverbal Behavioral Pattern (5%) 30 20 Assertive. The student demonstrate good eye contact, comfortable but firm posture, strong, steady, and audible voice, facial expressions matched to message. Aggressive. The student demonstrate glaring eye contact, moving or leaning too close, have a threatening gestures (pointed finger; clenched fist), loud voice, frequent interruptions.

10

Nonassertive. The student demonstrate a little eye contact, downward glances, slumped posture, constantly shifting weight, whiny voice

III. Verbal Behavior Pattern (5%) 30 20 10 Assertive. The student use direct and unambiguous language, No attributions or evaluations of others behavior, use of I statements and cooperative we statements. Aggressive. The student use swear words or abusive language, attributions and evaluations of others behavior, sexist or racist terms, explicit threats or putdown Nonassertive. The student use qualifier words such as (maybe, kind of) Fillers (uh, you know, well) Negaters (its not really that important, Im not sure)

Grading System:

Course Requirement: Criteria in Grading Class Standing Attendance Recitation/Oral defense/presentation Assignments and Activities (output from workshops) Proposal Defense Final Defense Major Examination TOTAL Prelim 10% 15% 25% Midterm 10% 5% 20% 25% 50% 100% 40% 100% 25% 40% 100% Finals 10% 5% 20%

Recommending Approval:

Approved by:

MA. SHERELYN S. TAMA, MSHRM HTM Department Head

ALICIA S. TULIAO, MBE Academic Dean

University of Saint Louis Tuguegarao City, Cagayan

COLLEGE OF TOURISM AND TECHNICAL-VOCATIONAL EDUCATION

Standard Rubrics in HTM 10 Travel Services Policies and Management

Attendance: (Two components: Attendance and Punctuality during classroom meetings.) 20 15 10 5 0 Tardiness 10 No Tardiness 7 1 Tardiness 5 2 Tardiness 3 3 Tardiness 1 4 Tardiness ** To compute, the percentage under the attendance, the scores of the two components will be added. Then, it will be divided by 30 and will be multiplied by the allotted percentage. Perfect attendance 1 Absence 2 Absences 3 Absences 4 Absences

In assignments and activities: For every meeting, the facilitator assesses the level of participation. ** To compute, get the summation of the scores of the students from week 1 to the last week of each grading period. Then divide it by the total score, eventually multiply it by the allotted percentage to get the equivalent score. The following are the standard rubrics: *FOR INDIVIDUAL LEVEL For Leaders 30 29 Very Commendable. Showed initiative and leadership. Demonstrate full responsibility. Encourage, influence and shows changing behavior for others to work. Passed the output on time. Commendable. The leader is charismatic and visionary. Very understanding in using power and influence. Works productively. Passed the output on time.

28 18 17 16 15 0

Moderately Commendable. Acts decisively. Put others first. He knows the paper, responds to and writes with his/her classmates. Knows what things to be done. Passed the output on time but lack other documents. Very Satisfactory. The leader makes productive contributions through talents, knowledge and good work habits but submitted incomplete output. Satisfactory. The leader builds greatness through personal humility and professional will. Moderately Satisfactory. The leader is unable to deliver on, implement the objectives of the assignment/activity due to incompetence or bad intentions. Fair. The leader is unable to deliver on, due to incompetence and a lack of follow through commitment. None. The leader under lead and tends to write the paper alone. Treats the members like other resources or numbers only.

For Members 30 25 20 18 17 16 15 0

Very Commendable. Showed leadership. Demonstrated full participation. Doesnt need to be supervised. Encouraged others to work. Commendable. Showed initiative. Demonstrated full participation. Doesnt need to be supervised. Moderately Commendable. Showed initiative. More of a follower than a leader. Demonstrated full participation. Very Satisfactory. Slightly showed initiative. Needed not to be supervised. Demonstrated participation. Satisfactory. Showed initiative. Demonstrated participation. Sometimes needs to be supervised. Moderately Satisfactory. Showed initiative. Demonstrated participation. Needed to be supervised. Fair. Often causes trouble or disturbance. Participates when supervised. None. Member/Leader is unavailable and absent

In Recitation: For every meeting the facilitator assesses the level of participation of students in class. ** To compute, get the summation of the scores of the students from the 1st meeting to the last meeting of each grading period. Then divide it by the total score, eventually multiply it by the allotted percentage to get the equivalent score. The following are the standard rubrics: *FOR INDIVIDUAL LEVEL Communication styles 20 Communication competent. The student has the ability to effectively use communication behaviors in a given context. 10 Assertive style. The student is expressive and self enhancing, pushes hard without attacking; permits others to influence outcome and self-enhancing without intruding others. 5 Aggressive. The student takes advantage of others; expressive and selfenhancing at others expense. Nonverbal Behavioral Pattern 20 Assertive. The student demonstrate good eye contact, comfortable but firm posture, strong, steady, and audible voice, facial expressions matched to

10 5

message. Aggressive. The student demonstrate glaring eye contact, moving or leaning too close, have a threatening gestures (pointed finger; clenched fist), loud voice, frequent interruptions. Nonassertive. The student demonstrate a little eye contact, downward glances, slumped posture, constantly shifting weight, whiny voice

Verbal Behavior Pattern 20 Assertive. The student use direct and unambiguous language, No attributions or evaluations of others behavior, use of I statements and cooperative we statements. 10 Aggressive. The student use swear words or abusive language, attributions and evaluations of others behavior, sexist or racist terms, explicit threats or putdown 5 Nonassertive. The student use qualifier words such as (maybe, kind of) Fillers (uh, you know, well) Negaters (its not really that important, Im not sure) Grading System:

Course Requirement: Criteria in Grading Class Standing Attendance Recitation Assignments and Activities (output from workshops) Quiz Major Examination TOTAL Prelim 10% 10% 10% 20% 50% 100% Midterm 10% 10% 10% 20% 50% 100% Finals 10% 10% 10% 20% 50% 100%

Recommending Approval:

Approved by:

MA. SHERELYN S. TAMA, MSHRM HTM Department Head

ALICIA S. TULIAO, MBE Academic Dean

University of Saint Louis Tuguegarao City, Cagayan

COLLEGE OF TOURISM AND TECHNICAL-VOCATIONAL EDUCATION

Standard Rubrics in S/Fam Tour- Seminars and Familiarization Tours

Attendance: (Two components: Attendance and Punctuality during classroom meetings.) 20 15 10 5 0 Tardiness 10 No Tardiness 7 1 Tardiness 5 2 Tardiness 3 3 Tardiness 1 4 Tardiness ** To compute, the percentage under the attendance, the scores of the two components will be added. Then, it will be divided by 30 and will be multiplied by the allotted percentage. Perfect attendance 1 Absence 2 Absences 3 Absences 4 Absences

In assignments and activities: For every meeting, the facilitator assesses the level of participation. ** To compute, get the summation of the scores of the students from week 1 to the last week of each grading period. Then divide it by the total score, eventually multiply it by the allotted percentage to get the equivalent score. The following are the standard rubrics: *FOR INDIVIDUAL LEVEL

For Leaders 30 29 28 18 17 16 15 0 Very Commendable. Showed initiative and leadership. Demonstrate full responsibility. Encourage, influence and shows changing behavior for others to work. Passed the output on time. Commendable. The leader is charismatic and visionary. Very understanding in using power and influence. Works productively. Passed the output on time. Moderately Commendable. Acts decisively. Put others first. He knows the paper, responds to and writes with his/her classmates. Knows what things to be done. Passed the output on time but lack other documents. Very Satisfactory. The leader makes productive contributions through talents, knowledge and good work habits but submitted incomplete output. Satisfactory. The leader builds greatness through personal humility and professional will. Moderately Satisfactory. The leader is unable to deliver on, implement the objectives of the assignment/activity due to incompetence or bad intentions. Fair. The leader is unable to deliver on, due to incompetence and a lack of follow through commitment. None. The leader under lead and tends to write the paper alone. Treats the members like other resources or numbers only.

For Members 30 25 20 18 17 16 15 0

Very Commendable. Showed leadership. Demonstrated full participation. Doesnt need to be supervised. Encouraged others to work. Commendable. Showed initiative. Demonstrated full participation. Doesnt need to be supervised. Moderately Commendable. Showed initiative. More of a follower than a leader. Demonstrated full participation. Very Satisfactory. Slightly showed initiative. Needed not to be supervised. Demonstrated participation. Satisfactory. Showed initiative. Demonstrated participation. Sometimes needs to be supervised. Moderately Satisfactory. Showed initiative. Demonstrated participation. Needed to be supervised. Fair. Often causes trouble or disturbance. Participates when supervised. None. Member/Leader is unavailable and absent

In Recitation: For every meeting the facilitator assesses the level of participation of students in class. ** To compute, get the summation of the scores of the students from the 1st meeting to the last meeting of each grading period. Then divide it by the total score, eventually multiply it by the allotted percentage to get the equivalent score. The following are the standard rubrics: *FOR INDIVIDUAL LEVEL Communication styles 20 Communication competent. The student has the ability to effectively use communication behaviors in a given context. 10 Assertive style. The student is expressive and self enhancing, pushes hard without attacking; permits others to influence outcome and self-enhancing without intruding others.

Aggressive. The student takes advantage of others; expressive and selfenhancing at others expense.

Nonverbal Behavioral Pattern 20 Assertive. The student demonstrate good eye contact, comfortable but firm posture, strong, steady, and audible voice, facial expressions matched to message. 10 Aggressive. The student demonstrate glaring eye contact, moving or leaning too close, have a threatening gestures (pointed finger; clenched fist), loud voice, frequent interruptions. 5 Nonassertive. The student demonstrate a little eye contact, downward glances, slumped posture, constantly shifting weight, whiny voice Verbal Behavior Pattern 20 Assertive. The student use direct and unambiguous language, No attributions or evaluations of others behavior, use of I statements and cooperative we statements. 10 Aggressive. The student use swear words or abusive language, attributions and evaluations of others behavior, sexist or racist terms, explicit threats or putdown 5 Nonassertive. The student use qualifier words such as (maybe, kind of) Fillers (uh, you know, well) Negaters (its not really that important, Im not sure) Grading System:

Course Requirement: Criteria in Grading Class Standing Attendance Recitation Assignments and Activities (output from workshops) Quiz Major Examination TOTAL Prelim 10% 5% 15% 20% 50% 100% Midterm 10% 5% 15% 20% 50% 100% Finals 10% 5% 15% 20% 50% 100%

Recommending Approval:

Approved by:

MA. SHERELYN S. TAMA, MSHRM HTM Department Head

ALICIA S. TULIAO, MBE Academic Dean