Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Anders Rosborg Black Specialist, FROSIO Level III Inspector FORCE Technology, Denmark
Introduction
CUI cost studies have shown that: 40 to 60 % of pipe maintenance costs are caused by CUI NDE/inspection costs with a high confidence level for detecting CUI are equal to or exceed field painting costs Approximately 10 % of the total maintenance budget is spent repairing damage from CUl
CUI risk
General temperature ranges in which risk of CUI is present: Carbon steel: -4 C to + 175 C: Risk of CUI (highest risk area: +60 C to +120 C) Stainless steel: +50 C to +175 C Insulation of process equipment is normally implemented when the outer steel temperature exceeds 50 C (due to the risk of work-related injuries as well as heat loss).
Carbon steel
Insulated carbon steel corrodes due to: Infiltration of water under insulation (rain, process liquids, fire water, etc.) Condensation water (Ingress of external contaminants) The insulation material may also contribute to CUI: Creates a crevice for water retention May absorb water May leach contaminants that increase corrosion rate
Corrosion rate of steel Closed: Closed system Temperature controls reaction Open: ? Open system 50 100 Oxygen diffusion
Temp. C
- Corrosion rates unpredictable - Simulates closed system - CUI rates of 1.5 to 3.0 mm per year may occur (~20 times greater than atmospherc corrosion rates)
Limit of insulation
Due to significant wall thinning caused by corrosion, a fracture and a gas leak occurred.
Cross sections through corroded pipes. Corrosion attacks have propagated from the outside surface.
Stainless steel
Stainless steel (austenitic or duplex) corrodes due to: 1. Chlorides (or other halides) in presence of water are transported to the hot surface 2. The chlorides are concentrated by evaporation of the water 3. The chloride concentration reaches a critical level causing stress corrosion cracking (SCC) 4. (The critical chloride concentration depends on: Temperature and alloy type) The insulation material may also contribute to CUI: Creates a crevice for water retention May absorb water May leach contaminants (e.g. chlorides) that cause ESCC
Stainless steel
ESCC: - Buried AISI 304 pipe in chloridecontaminated soil - Surface temp.: ~ 80-90 C - No insulation => concentration of chlorides on external surface
Stainless steel
CUI in inorganic zinc-coated heater after 8 years caused by water ingress around steam inlet nozzle (J. Houben, NACE 2012).
Corrosion protection
Carbon steel: Organic coatings Thermal-sprayed aluminum (TSA) (Personnel protecting cages) Stainless steel (austenitic or duplex): Organic coatings Thermal-sprayed aluminum (TSA) Al-foil wrapping (prevents ESCC and pitting) (Personnel protecting cages)
Methods of protection
Galvanic protection
Inhibitive protection
Barrier protection
* The specifications are guiding only. Coating manufacturer should be contacted for final assessment. ** Sealer is used to fill in the porosity of the TSA (5-30 %).
TSA
TSA may provide long-term corrosion protection at significant life cycle cost savings, however at higher initial costs. TSA provides atmospheric corrosion protection for more than 40 years. Has been recorded to provide 25-30 years of maintenance and inspection-free CUI service. Application by electric arc or flame spray. Requires high quality surface preparation and strict application control.
TSA / metallisation
Advantages The coating is robust Minor pores/damages are protected by the surrounding coating No under-rusting Unlimited construction sizes No risk of deformations (cold process) Disadvantages No treatment in hollow spaces, inside pipes, etc. The treatment prescribes a certain structural design Sharp edges must be chamfered/rounded Often large variations in layer thickness Quality control Price
TSA
Key points for TSA application for CUI prevention:
J. Houben (ExxonMobil), NACE 2012. Important that TSA is included already in the design phase! It may be very expensive to change the design later on / apply additional TSA on-site.