Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
9 June 2009
The data quality tools market continues to grow despite economic conditions, as organizations invest in master data
management and information governance. Vendors and buyers are pursuing innovations to improve support for
business-facing roles and increase the pervasiveness of data quality controls.
BI business intelligence
This document was revised on 23 June 2009. For more information,
see the Corrections page on gartner.com. CDQ Customer Data Quality
Completeness of Vision
functionality is also being recognized as a fundamental component of Business Model: The soundness and logic of
offerings in many related software markets, such as data integration tools, the vendor's underlying business proposition.
MDM solutions and BI platforms. As a result, an increasing number of Vertical/Industry Strategy: The vendor's
partnerships between MDM solution vendors and data quality tools vendors strategy to direct resources, skills and offerings
are occurring, as the desire for stronger matching, standardization and to meet the specific needs of individual market
segments, including verticals.
cleansing functionality for MDM grows. In addition, there is an increase in
the usage of data quality tools to support custom-developed MDM Innovation: Direct, related, complementary and
synergistic layouts of resources, expertise or
architectures in many organizations. capital for investment, consolidation, defensive
or pre-emptive purposes.
The vendors in this market offer a broad range of data quality functionality,
Geographic Strategy: The vendor's strategy
ranging from data quality analysis, profiling and monitoring, to data to direct resources, skills and offerings to meet
cleansing operations such as parsing, standardization and matching, the specific needs of geographies outside the
through to data enrichment. Much convergence and integration of "home" or native geography, either directly or
through partners, channels and subsidiaries as
technology has occurred, and today vendors offer more functionality within appropriate for that geography and market.
a smaller number of discrete products — most vendors have consolidated
the bulk of their core data quality functionality into a single data quality
platform, with data profiling remaining the only major functional component
commonly sold as a separate product. However, specialized add-on
capabilities (such as global name and address support, application-specific
knowledge bases and dashboards for data quality metrics) persist for their
core platforms, and even grow in number, as vendors adapt their packaging
and pricing models to suit a wider range of potential buyers.
One of the most significant trends in this market is the continued expansion
of the tools' capabilities beyond the basic data quality operations of parsing,
standardization and matching of structured data assets in a narrow set of
data domains (for example, customer data only). Increasingly, both new
entrants and longtime competitors are delivering technology with a focus on
data quality analysis, pervasive deployment of data quality controls,
ongoing data quality monitoring and the flexibility to address a range of
data subject areas.
The market for data quality tools is of moderate size (estimated at between
$400 million and $500 million at the end of 2008), and during the next few
years is expected to experience stronger growth than many other software
markets. This is a result of the significant attention that organizations are
focusing on information governance (of which data quality assurance is a
significant component, and for which data quality tools provide support for
facilitating and executing information governance initiatives), and cost
optimization (since data quality issues contribute to increased costs and
data quality tools can be leveraged to directly reduce inefficiencies and
waste by improving the productivity of people and the value of information
assets). Much of the innovation continues to come from outside the U.S. As
a result, the veteran data quality tool vendors are being challenged by
entrants with a more significant international focus. Many new entrants
focus on "domain-agnostic" data quality services (stand-alone or embedded
in applications), based on a centrally managed set of business rules.
However, with the increasing trend toward embedding data quality
capabilities in business applications, data integration tools and other
software offerings from larger vendors, these small competitors will face
significant challenges as they attempt to survive and grow.
Market Definition/Description
The data quality tools market comprises vendors that offer stand-alone
software products to address the core functional requirements of the data
quality discipline:
They must offer stand-alone (not only embedded in, or dependent on,
other products and services) packaged software tools that are
positioned, marketed and sold specifically for general-purpose data
quality applications.
They must deliver functionality that addresses, at a minimum,
profiling, parsing, standardization, cleansing and matching. Vendors
that offer narrow functionality (for example, they only address
cleansing and validation or only deal with matching) are excluded
because they do not provide complete suites of data quality tools.
They must support this functionality for data in more than one
language and specific to more than one country.
They must maintain an installed base of at least 50 production
customers for their data quality products.
They must support the opportunity for broad-scale deployment via
server-based runtime architectures.
They must demonstrate, via customer references, that the tools are
applicable in multiple data domains (for example, product/materials
data, financial data, customer/party data and/or other subject areas),
and in enterprisewide implementations.
A vendor that does not meet the above criteria may be considered for
inclusion if it is a new entrant that is demonstrably different from
established vendors, and which represents a future direction for data quality
tools.
There are many data quality tools vendors but most do not meet the above
criteria and are, therefore, not included in the Magic Quadrant. Many
vendors provide products that deal with one very specific data quality
problem, such as address cleansing and validation, but which cannot
support other types of application, or lack the full breadth of functionality
expected of today's data quality solutions. Others provide a range of
functionality, but operate only in a single country or support only narrow,
departmental implementations. Others may meet all the functional,
deployment and geographic requirements but are at a very early stage in
their "life span" and, therefore, have few, if any, production customers. The
following vendors may be considered by Gartner clients alongside those
appearing in the Magic Quadrant when deployment needs are aligned with
their specific capabilities; or they are newer entrants beginning to gain
visibility in the market but which lack a significant customer base:
Gartner will continue to monitor the status of these vendors for possible
inclusion in future updates of the Magic Quadrant for Data Quality Tools.
Return to Top
Vendors Added
No new vendors have been added to the Magic Quadrant since the previous
version.
Return to Top
Vendors Dropped
No vendors have been dropped from the Magic Quadrant since the previous
version.
Return to Top
Evaluation Criteria
Ability to Execute
Gartner analysts evaluate technology providers on the quality and efficacy of
the processes, systems, methods or procedures that enable IT providers'
performance to be competitive, efficient and effective, and to positively
affect revenue, retention and reputation. Ultimately, technology providers
are judged on their ability to capitalize on their vision, and their success in
doing so.
Table 1 gives our weightings for the Ability to Execute evaluation criteria.
Table 1. Ability to Execute Evaluation Criteria
Return to Top
Completeness of Vision
Gartner analysts evaluate technology providers on their ability to
convincingly articulate logical statements about current and future market
direction, innovation, customer needs and competitive forces, as well as
how they map to the Gartner position. Ultimately, technology providers are
assessed on their understanding of the ways that market forces can be
exploited to create opportunities.
We assess vendors' completeness of vision for the data quality tools market
by using the following criteria:
Return to Top
Leaders
Leaders in the market demonstrate strength across a complete range of data
quality functionality, including profiling, parsing, standardization, matching,
validation and enrichment. They exhibit a clear understanding and vision of
where the market is headed, including recognition of non-customer data
quality issues and the delivery of enterprise-level data quality
implementations. Leaders have an established market presence, significant
size and a multinational presence (directly or as a result of a parent
company).
Return to Top
Challengers
Challengers in the market provide strong product capabilities but may not
have the same breadth of offering as Leaders. For example, they may lack
several of the functional capabilities of a complete data quality solution.
Challengers have an established presence, credibility and viability, but may
demonstrate strength only in a specific domain (for example, only customer
name and address cleansing), and/or may not demonstrate a significant
degree of thought leadership and innovation.
Return to Top
Visionaries
Visionaries in the market demonstrate a strong understanding of current and
future market trends and directions, such as the importance of ongoing
monitoring of data quality, engagement of business subject matter experts
and delivery of data quality services. They exhibit capabilities aligned with
these trends, but may lack the market presence, brand recognition,
customer base and resources of larger vendors.
Return to Top
Niche Players
Niche Players often have limited breadth of functional capabilities and may
lack strength in rapidly evolving functional areas such as data profiling and
international support. In addition, they may focus solely on a specific
market segment (such as midsize businesses), limited geographic areas or a
single domain (such as customer data), rather than positioning themselves
toward broader use. Niche Players may have good functional breadth but
may have an early-stage presence in the market, with a small customer base
and limited resources. Niche Players that specialize in a particular
geographic area or data domain may have very strong offerings for their
chosen focus area and deliver substantial value for their customers in that
segment.
Return to Top
Datactics
Belfast, U.K., www.datactics.com
Return to Top
Strengths
Cautions
DataFlux
Cary, North Carolina, U.S., www.dataflux.com
Return to Top
Strengths
Cautions
While Project Unity is the right move to follow the market trends of
integrating data quality with data integration and MDM, there are no
market-changing results to report. It will take the vendor about 18 to
24 months to deliver a new integrated product. DataFlux will need to
expand its marketing scope to gain recognition beyond the area of
data quality, and to compete with much larger infrastructure
opponents, such as IBM, SAP or Informatica.
Customers report only average satisfaction with the value of
DataFlux's software relative to its price, and some customers continue
to struggle with the overall high price of the software, compared with
lower-cost solutions.
Although DataFlux provides broad data quality capabilities and
examples of multi-domain use are common, most recent customer
references use name and address profiling, batch-oriented cleansing
and matching, while some customers that use the tool in a
non-customer domain (product data, for example) report limited
usefulness. In addition, while the software is enabled for use in an
international environment, reference customers seem to focus on
single-country deployments, with the majority being English-language
countries.
Return to Top
DataLever
Boulder, Colorado, U.S., www.datalever.com
Return to Top
Strengths
Cautions
DataMentors
Wesley Chapel, Florida, U.S., www.datamentors.com
Return to Top
Strengths
Cautions
Datanomic
Cambridge, U.K., www.datanomic.com
Return to Top
Strengths
Cautions
Human Inference
Arnhem, The Netherlands, www.humaninference.com
Return to Top
Strengths
Cautions
IBM
Armonk, New York, U.S., www.ibm.com
Return to Top
Strengths
IBM has successfully embedded its data quality products portfolio into
its broader Information On Demand message. By promoting IBM's
platform vision, ubiquitous data quality functionality becomes a key
component of the information management portfolio. Backed by one
of the world's best-known brands and strong sales, consulting,
service and support functions, IBM approaches the data quality market
from many angles.
Information Analyzer (discovery, profiling and analysis) and
QualityStage (parsing, standardization and sophisticated matching)
continue to be positioned as enterprisewide data quality standards,
and are being used in several projects in customer organizations.
IBM's customers have started to use its data quality products in
multiple data domains, beyond customer data.
Reference customers report high satisfaction with the scalability and
performance of the solution. Also, customers praised the integrated
nature of the solution across the various modules, including profiling,
matching, cleansing and metadata management.
Return to Top
Cautions
Informatica
Redwood City, California, U.S., www.informatica.com
Return to Top
Strengths
Cautions
Innovative Systems
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S., www.innovativesystems.com
Return to Top
Strengths
Cautions
Netrics
Princeton, New Jersey, U.S., www.netrics.com
Return to Top
Strengths
Cautions
Cautions
SAP BusinessObjects
Walldorf, Germany, www.sap.com
Return to Top
Strengths
Cautions
Trillium Software
Billerica, Massachusetts, U.S., www.trilliumsoftware.com
Return to Top
Strengths
Cautions
Strengths
Cautions
The Magic Quadrant is copyrighted 9 June 2009 by Gartner, Inc. and is reused with permission.
The Magic Quadrant is a graphical representation of a marketplace at and for a specific time
period. It depicts Gartner's analysis of how certain vendors measure against criteria for that
marketplace, as defined by Gartner. Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service
depicted in the Magic Quadrant, and does not advise technology users to select only those vendors
placed in the "Leaders" quadrant. The Magic Quadrant is intended solely as a research tool, and is
not meant to be a specific guide to action. Gartner disclaims all warranties, express or implied,
with respect to this research, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular
purpose.
© 2009 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction and distribution of this
publication in any form without prior written permission is forbidden. The information contained
herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Gartner disclaims all warranties as
to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of such information. Although Gartner's research may
discuss legal issues related to the information technology business, Gartner does not provide legal
advice or services and its research should not be construed or used as such. Gartner shall have no
liability for errors, omissions or inadequacies in the information contained herein or for
interpretations thereof. The opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice.