Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Design Vision
The future
Hospital organizations seek superior performance.
An architect ultimately has a responsibility to
design buildings that are sound in all aspects --
structurally, psychologically, and emotionally.
Evidence from science blended with art of architecture.
In June 2012, on an Evidence Based Practice
workshop Kirk Hamilton reported that a
highly respected physician claimed only 15%
of current medicine is based on evidence,
so Hamilton speculated that only 5% of
potentially useful evidence might be available
for architecture. EBD (science) itself is not
the answer to good architecture. Intuition
is a powerful and necessary tool that has
to be used, but used with a great caution!
(Lundin,2012)
The essential of human values and the complementary
support of technology.
Technology is constantly improving in
healthcare. The ideas of creating a healthier
hospital go hand in hand with creating a
partnership between the patient (and often
relatives) and healthcare professionals that is
based on respect and dignity. Returning the
hospital to the people and for the people has
just begun.
1
2
human
care love
warmth
trust
lively
spirit
social
technology
professional
support equipment
health
science
art
3
DESIGN VISION
107 106
Design Values
D
esign focused for people is an important pillars symbolizing
my design values. Person-centred design. It may integrate
technology and economics, but it starts with what humans
need, or might need. What makes life easier, more enjoyable? What
makes technology useful and usable? But that is more than simply
good ergonomics, putting the buttons in the right place. Its often about
understanding culture and context before we even know where to start
to have ideas. Design relate to their surrounding, cultural diversity,
innovation, and sustainable development.
Design is people
Jane Jacobs
DESIGN VALUES DESIGN PROPOSALS
Design Proposals
I propose 2 design proposals, major and minor intervention for the
renovation of the internal ward in stra Hospital.
The Major Intervention
T
he Major proposal is keeping the core of the structural building
like shafts, column and vertical communications, but it is required to
tire down the whole interior walls in order apply the ideal space
and room functions that is needed to get maximum results that support
healing process of patients and more effective work environment for the
staffs.
I propose to expand the area of the ward twice size bigger than the
existing one in order to fit more of single bedrooms, and it means taking
over the area of another ward will lead to changes in the management
system. The intervention also demands a high cost investment of money.
On the other hand, the design can pay for itself by improving service
efficiency, patient safety and satisfaction, as mentioned in the chapter
The Economic Benefit of Evidence Based Design.
The Minor Intervention
T
he second proposal is considering technically, organizationally
feasible and financially viable by limiting the cost of intervention.
Some of applicable interior solutions in the major intervention
such as furniture or product, etc could be implemented in the minor
intervention depending on the budget.
109 108
Major
intervention
MAJOR INTERVENTION
PATIENT ROOM
Waiting room
Single (16) and double (5) patient rooms
Patient lavotory with disinfection (21)
PATIENT COMMON AREA
Dayroom
Pantry
Mini library and winter garden with balcony
STAFF AREA
Reception room
Manager room
Team rooms (4)
Medicine rooms (2)
1.1
1.2
1.3
2.1
2.2
2.3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
29 m
2
367 m
2
173.5 m
2
21 m
2
59 m
2
112 m
2
9,5 m
2
17 m
2
90 m
2
25,5 m
2
1.1
2.2
2.1
2.3
1.2
1.3
4.1
3.1
3.3
4.2
3.2
5.2
3.6
3.4
3.5
3.7
3.8
3.9
4.2
5.1
5.3
Sterilisation rooms (2)
Supply rooms (2
Meeting & multifunctional room
Relax room
Trolley storage room
STAFF COMMON AREA
Conference room with balcony
Dayroom with balcony
SERVICES
WC (3)
Waste disposal rooms (2)
Technical room
CORRIDOR
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
4.1
4.2
5.1
5.2
5.3
32.5 m
2
25.5 m
2
25 m
2
6.5 m
2
11.5 m
2
38 m
2
59 m
2
14.5 m
2
16 m
2
3.5 m
2
420 m
2
PRIVATE SEMI PRIVATE
SEMI PUBLIC/
SERVICES
PROGRAMMING UNIT 352A
111 110
In between
WHY?
Work efficiency, increase safety and working
satisfaction
HOW?
Decentralize nurse stations into 4 divisions and
decentralize storages
Pliability
WHY?
For future needs.
HOW?
Room planning in grid and module
Follow the structural core of the building
(columns, shafts, vertical communications)
$$ $
+ -
Design Concept
Be seen
WHY?
Ease atmosphere, better way finding for all users, more
safety feeling
HOW?
Transparant or translucent wall., Less wall, open work
spaces, Transparant patient door
$$ $
+ -
Matahari
WHY?
Daylight is an essencial element in healthcare, which
is contribute to healthier persons and more efficient
recovery process.
HOW?
Big wide window, low sill window, transparancy
$$ $
+ -
$$ $
+ -
MAJOR INTERVENTION
Bring greenery inside
WHY?
Mostly for its healing benefit
HOW?
Balcony garden (winter garden)
Redesign, Reuse and Recycle
WHY?
Good for environment
HOW?
Redesign existing furnitures
Reuse goods that have qualities
Use materials that can be recycle or from
$$ $
+ -
$$ $
+ -
Zoom in
WHY?
To find the solution from the details
HOW?
Putting oneself in the position of the person
$$ $
+ -
Shared space
WHY?
Encourage people to meet, do activities together,
where interactions and conversations
can naturally emerge.
HOW?
Create common spaces such as an activity room,
winter garden, mini library, seating area, etc
$$ $
+ -
MAJOR INTERVENTION
113 112
352 A
352 B
MAJOR INTERVENTION
FLOOR PLAN MAJOR INTERVENTION
Scale 1 : 250 N
Staff area, 243 m
2
Common patient area, 192 m
2
Services, 34 m
2
Common staff area, 97 m
2
Corridor, 420 m
2
Patient area, 540.5 m
2
MAJOR INTERVENTION
115 114
The design of the patient doors
transfer light to the corridor and brighten up the ward.
Section of the corridor.
MAJOR INTERVENTION
FLOOR PLAN MAJOR INTERVENTION
Scale 1 : 250 N
Strategy 1 :: Let the sunshine in
FUNCTION: THE WARD
CONDITION: Patients rooms and common areas have abundant of daylight through
the window, but office area that located in the middle core and the corridor area have
no sufficient daylight and fresh air.
PROPOSAL: Its important to get sufficient daylight to reduce stress and pain. By
providing transparency walls, doors and windows will brighten up the ward (see
the picture to the left). It will give a positive impact to patient recovery process and
reduce staff stress level. The doorframe made by wood for a warmth welcome, non-
institutional ambiance, good visual and timeless aesthetic. A translucent glass panel
door allows daylight transfer to the corridor and still provides patient dignity. Adding
a person nametag on the patient door instead of number. A contrast colour between
handle and the door panel will be really helpful for people with eye problems. (see
detail patient door). Providing the ward with big, deep and low window sill designs in
most of the room (see detail window).
MAJOR INTERVENTION
117 116
DETAIL WINDOW
Scale 1 : 50
DETAIL PATIENT DOOR
Scale 1 : 50
Olsson Svensson
DETAIL WINDOW
Scale 1 : 50
DETAIL PATIENT DOOR
Scale 1 : 50
Olsson Svensson
DETAIL WINDOW
Scale 1 : 50
DETAIL PATIENT DOOR
Scale 1 : 50
MAJOR INTERVENTION
FLOOR PLAN MAJOR INTERVENTION
Scale 1 : 250
Strategy 2 :: Shorten the corridor
FUNCTION: THE CORRIDOR
CONDITION: According to the survey, the staffs stated that the existing corridor was
often full of help aid, chaotic, and too tight. The existing corridor length is about 50 m
straight without any possibility to seat in between. And the walk distance for the staff
to walk pass to the other ward is approximate 40 m through the powder room and/or
the pantry area. The long corridors that are oftentimes predictable, however, increase
the distances travelled by nurses daily, which can ultimately lead to nurse fatigue given
their long hours and it means lower quality care.
PROPOSAL: The strategy is to shorten the corridor by adding 4 junctions in every 915
m length; providing seating area where people can do activities and providing small
storages for trollies and help aids in the corridor area. Total corridor area is around
423 m
2
.
N
MAJOR INTERVENTION
119 118
Single patient room module
Double bedroom module
MAJOR INTERVENTION
FLOOR PLAN MAJOR INTERVENTION
Scale 1 : 250
Strategy 3 :: 26 beds and 62% single patient room
FUNCTION: THE PATIENT ROOM
CONDITION: Inside of the unit there are 3 rooms of 4 beds, 3 rooms of 2 beds and
two of single patient rooms. Only the single rooms have a private bathroom. In total
there are 20 patient beds. Generally the ward needs more of patient rooms. Some
cases patients stayed in the office room, treatment room/should squeeze with other
4 patients in a small room. The existing patient rooms are too small both for patients,
relatives and staffs to move around.
PROPOSAL: Research has documented several key accomplishments that the private
patient room brings to a hospital: increased inner-staff/patient communication, better
infection control, increased patient satisfaction, increased privacy, environmental control/
comfort, increased social support and decrease in medical errors (Cullinan, 2010). Also
the staff questionnaire results strengthen the facts that single bedroom gives better
outcomes for persons than double bedroom (see appendix). Therefore, I propose mainly
single patient room, 16 beds. But also 5 double bedrooms to give another option for
people who prefer not to be alone in the room and anticipation to overcapacity. In
total 26 patient beds with total area of patient room is 540 m
2
.
N
MAJOR INTERVENTION
121 120
SECTION C-C
Scale 1 : 50
1. Provide a family zone in the patient room
2. Private toilet with shower and disinfection
3. Conveniently placed sinks, hand washing liquid,
dispensers and alcohol rubs
4. Hidden ceiling lift into toilet
5. Visual privacy are supported
6. Non-instutitional design
7. Views to outside
8. Large window sills to get maximum of daylight
9. Low window sills allow residents to look out when
lying in bed
10. Controllability of lighting system, thermal comfort,
glare
11. Sound-absorbing ceiling tiles
12. Rubber sound absorbent flooring with wood
motif.
13. Possibility to put TV and computer system
14. Adapted for wheelchair use
SECTION C-C
Scale 1 : 50
Quality of the patient room
MAJOR INTERVENTION
SINGLE ROOM MODULE
Scale 1 : 100
C C
D
D
SECTION D-D
Scale 1 : 50
SINGLE ROOM MODULE
Scale 1 : 100
SECTION D-D
Scale 1 : 50
MAJOR INTERVENTION
123 122
Staff area
Relatives area
Patient area
Bathroom with disinfection
Window design with angle. It gives
possibility to look outside while a
person seating on the chair, create
more space and an interesting
facade.
Position of the bed allows patient
to see through all over the patient
room.. View to the window, relatives
seating area, door area and wall
with a clock and white board for time
orientation, information and personal
message.
A private bathroom with disinfection
close to the patient bed.
Total area per single bedroom is 17,5
m
2
and 5,5 m
2
private bathroom.
MAJOR INTERVENTION
Here is a view from outside the patient room. This is a
sketching of storage and alco-gel cabinet. The panel for the
alco-gel station is in eye-catching colour that can be seen
easily. As a reminder,and a polite way to insist on cleanliness.
Alco-gel Cabinet
MAJOR INTERVENTION
125 124
Provide the staff area in the patient room
with enough storages to keep sanitation
stuffs and equipments that are needed for
more organize and tidier
Staff Water Basin
MAJOR INTERVENTION
Private bathroom is designed with handrail, non-slip and
easy to clean rubber flooring. The adding wall behind the
closet (vtrumskassett) functions to gives extra room for more
comfortable for person who helps a person to use the toilet.
Patient Bathroom
MAJOR INTERVENTION
127 126
Flexible sofa for relatives that can be use as bed as well by pull
down the two armrests in order to get more space to sleep.
The sofa made from white-pigmented ash wood. The white
pigment protects the wood from discolouration and easy to maintain
and clean.The fabric is used anti-fungal, anti-microbial surface
protection and prohibits the growth of bacterial and associated
odours, infection and cross contamination.
Flexible sofa
MAJOR INTERVENTION
DOUBLE ROOM MODULE
Scale 1 : 100
E E
SECTION E-E
Scale 1 : 50
DOUBLE ROOM MODULE
Scale 1 : 100
SECTION E-E
Scale 1 : 50
MAJOR INTERVENTION
129 128
Staff area Relatives area
Patient area Bathroom with disinfection
This sketch illustrates an acoustic strategy for
patient bed pod. The ceiling design help the
sound wave direct to bed rather that crossing
the room. So the volume between staff and
patient can be reduced.
The bed pod design helps to promote
a calmer environment, better privacy and
communication between patient and staffs in
double room.
Total area per double bedroom is 28,2 m
2
and
6,2 m
2
private bathroom.
Position of the bed opposite to each other allowing
both beds to have views to outside through low
window sills.
What do you miss in the physical
space of the room?
Calm and peace.
Theres a lot of noise all the time.
anynomous patient in internal medicine ward, stra
MAJOR INTERVENTION
The patient bed pod consists of a bed panel,
lighting, hidden ceiling lift, and small wardrobe.
Hidden ceiling lift produced by a company
called Integralift. It is a new safe patient handling
solution that enhances workflow efficiency, safety
and offers an aesthetic alternative to ceiling lifts.
The hidden ceiling lift consists of: 1) vertical cabinet,
2) top cabinet, 3) vertical structure, 4) lifter, 5) lifting
bar, 6) remote control, 7) sling and 8) down lights.
3
6
7
2
5
4
1
8
Patient Bed Pod
MAJOR INTERVENTION
131 130
Perspective Double Bedroom
All the patient room use rubber sound absorbent
flooring with wood motif. It provides a quiet,
extremely comfortable walking surface and resist
most chemicals. Low maintenance and no waxing
help reduce life cycle costs
Acoustic material for the furniture, ceiling tiles,
suspended ceiling to help reduce noise
Curtain for privacy
Place for relative
Low window sill
Positive or funny words written on the ceiling
could encourage person to think about good
things that can make them smile.
Dressing up the bed panel full of medical
equipment with nature figure for example, could
be slightly softening the institutional atmosphere.
Hidden ceiling lift
MAJOR INTERVENTION
133 132
Smart Matrass
This experiment gave me
a conceptual idea for an
intelligent matrass that cover
by hydro chromic can indicate
when fluid passed through
the hole site by changing
colour. Its immediately a
visual indicator telling nurses
that the matrass has been
compromised.
1 2
3 4
Here is my experiment using hydro-chromic ink that react to
moisture. There are two layers of ink on top of each other. When
moisture/water is applied, the top hydro-chromic layer goes clear
revealing the colour underneath.
MAJOR INTERVENTION
By provide a tool for patients where they can
shows their personal photo. It helps caregivers see
one, not as a patient, but as a person precious
to their family. The bag should be easily place on
any bed rail and wheelchair. Hand sanitizer, a
medical information card, notepad and pen, and
a TV remote control cover should be inside the
bag. A printed words on the bag as reminder for
patient and staff to always clean the hands.
Patient Bag
If someone are hard of hearing, or are allergic
to latex, they can post the message in the clip. It
gives safety feeling. Patient can put their personal
stuff such as glasses, hearing aid, etc close to their
reach. It shows the name that patient prefer to call.
One can display a favourite photo or the
answers to the questions on the card such as
Whats thing really make you laugh. What is your
favourite place? This tool helps staffs to get know
patient more as a person.
MAJOR INTERVENTION
135 134
Autumn
Summer
Winter
Spring
Use theme approach for the staff teams area and
the whole ward to provide visible and easily understood signage.
Simplicity in selection of textiles and materials, without being too cold,
creates a calmer space thats simple and easy to understand.
The theme appproch might encourage patients to walk in the
corridor instead of just lying in the bed,
to experience different seasons theme in the ward.
MAJOR INTERVENTION
FLOOR PLAN MAJOR INTERVENTION
Scale 1 : 250
Strategy 4 :: Decentralized staff team areas
FUNCTION: THE STAFF WORKING AREAS
CONDITION: Staff rooms in the middle core have no sufficient daylight and fresh air. The
ward has 2 division of nurse stations, but the centralized of storages (waste and clean)
increase the distance travelled by nurses. It means low work efficiency. Its good for
nurses, who get to spend more time on direct patient care and less time running around.
That leads to higher job satisfaction. Happy nurses are also engaged nurses. Research
shows that organizations in all industries that have a high level of engagement among
their employees can outperform their competition by 20%. (Herman Miller Healthcare,
2010).
PROPOSAL: One of the questionnaire results about the major barrier of implementation
of Person Centred care was doctors. It was the third most answered after lack of time
and staffs. After compared it with the interview results. I have found out that one of
the real problems is a communication problem. Therefore, I suggest having a teamwork
space, instead of separation work areas between nurses and physicians. This could
help for a better communication between staff and staff. Decentralized staff team area
into 4 teams with big window to get sufficient daylight, air and view. Decentralized
workstation and storages, 2 in the middle core. Staff areas consist of 1 reception, 4
team areas, 1 private office room, 2 meeting rooms, 1 relax room, 2 supply rooms, 2
disinfection rooms, 2 medicine rooms, and 1 manager room.
N
MAJOR INTERVENTION
137 136
Perspective Nurse Station
It has view to outside and provide with adequate
daylight to reduce stress
Transparency wall of the staff areas are not only
to transfer light into corridor but also can be seen
as a warm welcome for the visitors
Season theme for better way finding and visibility
Acoustic materials for floor, ceiling and furniture
Adjustable desk and chair to reduce person falls
or injuries
There are 4 nurse stations in the ward
MAJOR INTERVENTION
139 138
Perspective Team Area
Facilitate the ward with an interactive teamwork
space for nurses, physicians, and candidate
students.
Sufficient daylight to reduce stress
Position of the white board that may contain of
confidential informations should be hidden from
public view
Acoustic materials for floor, ceiling and furniture
Adjustable desk and chair to reduce person falls
or injuries
There are 4 team areas in total 90 m2, each
room is around 22,5 m2
MAJOR INTERVENTION
141 140
Thermo-chromic textile is integrated into the design. This sample has
been made by reversible and water-based thermo-chromic powder
mixed with transparent ink. Activation temperature is below 22C. When
the temperature is cooled the pigment goes from original colour - dark
blue - back again to original colour.
MAJOR INTERVENTION
FLOOR PLAN MAJOR INTERVENTION
Scale 1 : 250
Strategy 5 :: Bring the outdoors inside
FUNCTION: THE PATIENT COMMON AREAS
CONDITION: The common kitchen room in the southern part of the ward that is shared
with the other ward has a good quality with a big wide window toward south offers
views to nature. Unfortunately the location is unseen from the corridor and there is
no sign giving a clue for visitors or patients about the space. What missing also are
atmospheres of ease, possibility for activities, possibility to get fresh air and more
storages for food trollies.
PROPOSAL: Bring the outdoors inside to create a connection with nature by building
balconies for winter garden. The winter garden toward south has great qualities to get
daylight and nice views to nature to support patients healing process. It also facilitates
the ward with a place to do activities and also functions as a positive distraction to
help distracting people from their negative feelings into a tolerable or even relaxing
and enjoyable feeling. By providing a transparency in the end of corridor through the
winter garden allow the space to be seen by visitors. Another strategy is to locate
common area for patients and relatives in the centred and make it as the heart of the
ward. The dayroom has direct connection to the pantry in the middle. The openness
and transparency of area surrounding makes the spaces look bigger.
N
MAJOR INTERVENTION
143 142
before after
Redesign the existing chair
I have chose this chair, because of the design is quite timeless and have
armrests. And its pretty easy to redesign, which means low cost. I came out with
rocking chair design. Why rocking chair? According researcher when rocking,
blood pressure falls and respiration slows. Rocking causes a reduction in anxiety
and depression. Nancy Watson, director of Center for Clinical Research on Aging,
reported a decreased need for anxiety and depression medication in those who
she observed.
I suggest placing the rocking chair in the winter garden.
MAJOR INTERVENTION
Perspective of the rocking chair
MAJOR INTERVENTION
145 144
Perspective Pantry & Dayroom
MAJOR INTERVENTION
147 146
FLOOR PLAN MAJOR INTERVENTION
Scale 1 : 250
Strategy 6 :: Bridging the staff communication
FUNCTION: THE STAFF COMMON AREAS
CONDITION: Staff pantry has no view to outside, any fresh air and out-dated furniture.
PROPOSAL: Conference room and staff pantry are located outside the ward area.
They have access to balconies allow abundantly of daylight and fresh air. These spaces
use together with the other ward on the same floor as a communication bridge.
N
MAJOR INTERVENTION
FLOOR PLAN MAJOR INTERVENTION
Scale 1 : 250
Strategy 7 :: Decentralized services & storages
FUNCTION: SERVICE ROOMS
CONDITION: The impression of the ward generally is chaotic. Its mainly because of the
ward lack of storage and the place is too small. The centralization of the supply storage
increases staff walking distance.
PROPOSAL: Therefore by placing 5 storages along the corridor will help to increase
staff efficiency and work satisfaction. Also by providing 4 spots for food trollies will
keep the corridor tidy, organized and clean from obstructions. Service areas such as 3
toilets both for visitors and staffs (2 are accessible toilets), technical room, cleaning and
waste room. Healthcare professionals main focus are to take care patient and other
division should do the other tasks For instance; logistic staffs handle supply, cleaning
department handle waste etc.
N
MAJOR INTERVENTION
149 148
Minor
intervention
MINOR INTERVENTION
PATIENT ROOM
Single (4), double (6), 4 bedroom (6)
Patient lavotory, shower, powder room
PATIENT COMMON AREA
Dayroom (2)
Common Pantry
Mini library
STAFF AREA
Reception room (352A- 352B)
Manager room (352A- 352B)
Team rooms (4)
Medicine rooms (2)
Sterilisation rooms (2)
Supply rooms (2)
Meeting & multifunctional room
WC (2)
STAFF COMMON AREA
Dayroom
Conference room
Expedition
SERVICES
Technical room
Trolley storage room
CORRIDOR
MINOR INTERVENTION
1.1
1.2
2.1
2.2
2.3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
418 m
2
83 m
2
38 m
2
41 m
2
19 m
2
17,5 m
2
34 m
2
118 m
2
26 m
2
26 m
2
39 m
2
28 m
2
4 m
2
35 m
2
25 m
2
180 m
2
3,5 m
2
8,5 m
2
290 m
2
4.1
4.2
4.3
5.1
5.2
Programming 352A - 352B
151 150
FLOOR PLAN MINOR INTERVENTION
Scale 1 : 250
352 A
352 B
MINOR INTERVENTION
N
Staff area, 301 m
2
Common patient area, 98 m
2
Services, 3,5 m
2
Common staff area, 240 m
2
Corridor, 290 m
2
Patient area, 501 m
2
MINOR INTERVENTION
153 152
FLOOR PLAN MINOR INTERVENTION
Scale 1 : 250
FLOOR PLAN MINOR INTERVENTION
Scale 1 : 250
Keeping the two wards
just like it is now and
minimazing design
intervention for the
economic point of view.
Expanding the wards
area to fit
more of staff areas.
FLOOR PLAN MINOR INTERVENTION
Scale 1 : 250
352 A
352 B
The peach area is a
common area for all staffs
in the same the floor.
MINOR INTERVENTION
FLOOR PLAN MINOR INTERVENTION
Scale 1 : 250
The darker purple area
shows the area that
no change and the
light purple has either
changed function or an
interior structural change..
FLOOR PLAN MINOR INTERVENTION
Scale 1 : 250
Shorten the corridor into
2 squares with seating
area and 2 small junctions
for passing through to the
other ward.
FLOOR PLAN MINOR INTERVENTION
Scale 1 : 250
Patient room area
consists like the existing
one, 20 beds each wards,
total 40 beds.
MINOR INTERVENTION
Design Strategies
155 154
Applying the same
strategy like the major
intervention for the
patient room.
DETAIL WINDOW
Scale 1 : 50
DETAIL PATIENT DOOR
Scale 1 : 50
Olsson Svensson
FLOOR PLAN MINOR INTERVENTION
Scale 1 : 250
Installing LED-ceiling tiles
in the treatment rooms
that have no view and
access to outside.
It helps patient calmer
and more relax.
4 2 2 1 1 2 4 4
The door made by wood for warmth welcome,
non-institutional ambiance, and good visual and
timeless aesthetic.
Put a person name on the patient door instead
of number. I really think its one of the difference
approach between patient and person centred
care.
A contrast colour between handle and the door
panel will be really helpful for elderly people.
A translucent glass door panel will make the
corridor brighter.
3 four bedroom, 3 double
bedroom, and two single
bedroom per each ward.
MINOR INTERVENTION
4 2 2 1 1 2 4 4
4 BEDS PATIENT ROOM
Scale 1 : 200
DOUBLE BEDS ROOM
Scale 1 : 200
SINGLE PATIENT ROOM
Scale 1 : 200
Installing bed pod in the double
and four-bed room
for patient dignity
MINOR INTERVENTION
157 156
FLOOR PLAN MINOR INTERVENTION
Scale 1 : 250
Decentralized supply,
disinfection and medicine
room into 2 divisions.
Make a change in
storage system into more
compact one to save
space.
Adding meeting rooms and
multifunctional room.
Decentralized teamwork
area.Transparency in the
work area for a warm
welcome to visitors.
Adding reception area
close to main door,
thereby removing the
patient or visitor stress of
not knowing where to go
in unfamiliar surrounding
Creating experience flows
by implementing season
theme approach.
MINOR INTERVENTION
Staff common rooms such
as day room, conference
room, expedition rooms
that also use by other
wards in the same floor.
Another strategy is to
make the common room
as the heart of the ward.
Combine the patient
pantry and day room for
bigger open atmosphere.
Adding extra storages for
trollies and wheelchairs in
the service areas.
MINOR INTERVENTION
159 158
Illustration: (Longe-Olsson, 2013)
U
nderstanding peoples experiences and needs demands ways to also capture
their environmental context and conditions. This includes the pace, rhythm and
flow of activities and behaviour as well as specific contextual qualities of multi-
sensorial experience.
As care settings expand beyond the hospital to include new areas, so to do research tools
need to develop to effectively capture and communicate the diverse qualities that shape
the experiences people have when staying in, working in and visiting these spaces.
With the realization that design could positively impact peoples healthcare experiences
by also considering the healthcare environment itself, design research techniques were
integrated to enrich and deepen the level of contextual research. Conclusively, research
is necessary to support design and design is necessary to collaborate findings and provide
settings for future research (Hamilton, 2012).
I believe we should have a deeper understanding of the components that make up our
world, and right now, we dont know enough about these high-tech composites our future
will be made of. Smart materials are hard to obtain in small quantities. Theres barely
any information available on how to use them, and very little is said about how they
are produced. So for now, they exist mostly patents only universities and corporations
have access to (Mota, 2012). My expectation is that the thesis will encourage people to
know more about smart materials and make experiment with materials. The more people
experiment with materials, the more researchers are willing to share their research, and
manufacturers their knowledge, the better chances we have to create technologies that
truly serve us all.
I also hope to spread more the understanding of Evidence Based design and Person
Centred Design outside healthcare interior. I believe, the positive aspects that I have
highlighted in my thesis are not only to create a healing environment for patient, but also to
improve general health settings, could be in home, offices, or schools.
Conclusion
CONCLUSION
161 160
Appendix
Feature Visions for Healthcare Housing and Work
HOSPITAL ARCHITECTURE AS AN ACTIVE MEDICINE
We are architect students at Chalmers doing our thesis about
how the environment could be adapted to support a person-centered care.
The goal of this project is to understand
how the ward environment can be more supportive for patients, families, and staf.
This is an inquiry form that will not have any impact on your job.
Your participation in the survey is completely voluntary
and you can at any time choose to cancel without giving reasons.
If you have any questions, please contact
Bilyana Docheva eller Sophy Sapan Longe Olsson
email: bilyana@student.chalmers.se, sophy@student.chalmers.se
The questionnaire will be available for a perioud of two weeks.
Once the questionnaire is completed please submit it to the head of ward no later than 6 March 2013.
Integrating architecture as a vital healing element in patient treatment -
bridging the gap between research, users and architects
Bilyana Docheva
Sophy Sapan Longe Olsson
1/6
STAFF QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
163 162
Feature Visions for Healthcare Housing and Work
PART 1 : BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Date :
Your age (circle one) :
Position :
How long have you been employed in the ward :
under 30 30-39 40-49 50-59 60+
less than 1r 1-3 r 4-10 r more than 11 r
PART 2 : INVOLVEMENT WITH PATIENT CENTERED CARE
How long have you been involved with the process of PCC?
Have you worked in another care development project before?
What is the essence of patient centered care?
Can you describe any changes in your routines since the implementation of person-centered care?
Do you see any improvements with the new approach?
What are the major barriers which stand in the way of implementation of PCC principles?
2/6
PART 3 : PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
3.1 THE DESIGN OF THE PATIENT ROOM: SINGLE ROOM DOUBLE ROOM
agree disagree strongly disagree
Please rate the following
statements by marking in this way:
strongly agree
supports private conversations
support the patient's feeling of safety
21 5 1 4 12
14 3 4 16 1 4
STAFF QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
3/6
increases patient satisfaction of care
facilitates patient personalization
adjustment
infuences patient recovery
reduces patient isolation
reduces patient stress level
supports patient's chance for a good
night's sleep
allows for a good communication between
you and patient
reduces your stress level
prevents work injuries
prevent medical errors
increases your work satisfaction
allows for good professional collaboration
increases the time you can spend with
the patients
provides a better environment for relatives
reduces the risk of of infection
has adequate day light source
has sufcient lighting for various needs
PART 3 : PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
3.1 THE DESIGN OF THE PATIENT ROOM: SINGLE ROOM DOUBLE ROOM
agree disagree strongly disagree
Please rate the following
statements by marking in this way:
strongly agree
9 6 9 10 1 3 3 1
11 8 8 8 2 2 3
15 9 6 5 6
6 3 13 13 1 2 2
1 2 4 9 12 9 3
8 9 10 12 1 1 2
20 9 1 4 8
20 9 1 3 5
8 13 6 5 7 3
8 6 8 8 5 4 1 1
10 10 9 8 1 1
10 11 10 8 1 2
4 3 11 13 3 3
6 9 8 8 1 5 3 2
14 8 7 4 7 1
18 11 3 5 4
4 6 4 7 2 2 4
STAFF QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
165 164
4/6
3.1 THE DESIGN OF THE PATIENT ROOM:
allows visual contact with the patients
has views of nature
has access to physical contact with nature
reduces stress caused by noise
3.2 THE DESIGN OF THE WORK SPACE :
supports staf collaboration
makes it easy to move
supports staf's perception of time (day and night),
place and person
ofers views of nature
gives adequate daylight
reduces stress caused by noise
gives opportunities to control the environment
(light, temperature, equipment)
gives opportunities to control the environment
(light, temperature, equipment)
3.3 THE DESIGN OF THE CORRIDOR :
makes it easy to move
gives adequate daylight
makes it easy to fnd in the ward
SINGLE ROOM DOUBLE ROOM
agree disagree strongly disagree
Please rate the following
statements by marking in this way:
strongly agree
12 4 3 8 4 8 2
4 9 7 7 4 5 5
2 7 1 1 12 6 12
10 11 9 6 2 2 1
7 13 3 4 3 9 2
4 11 6 1
3 4 10 4
4 5 9
2 4 11 4
3 3 12 1
3 4 8 6
3 2 6 8
5 9 8
2 4 14 1
6 11 4
STAFF QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
+ -
+ -
How does the environment of the work place supports your work performance?
Does the physicality of the work place supports or prevails the process of collaboration on diferent levels:
staf - staf
staf- patient
patient- relatives
staf- relatives
If you would like any changes or additions in the physical space, what would they be? In what way will they
support afect your work routine?
5/6
3.4 THE DESIGN OF THE KITCHEN :
supports relationship between patient and staf
supports relationship between patient and relatives
makes it easy to move
is attractive (feel, appearance, atmosphere)
gives adequate daylight
has views of nature
gives opportunities to control the environment
(light, temperature, equipment)
PART 4 : OPENQUESTIONS
agree disagree strongly disagree
Please rate the following
statements by marking in this way:
strongly agree
4 2 13 1
3 7 11
2 7 11 1
3 4 10 3
10 10 1
10 9 2
4 3 14
STAFF QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
+ -
167 166
Thanks for your participation!
Once you have completed the questionnaire,
please submit it to the head of ward no later than 6 March 2013.
6/6
How would you describe the importance of the physical environment for the patient?
How the physical design in the ward afects the patients recovery?
Describe the ward with fve words (at least three of the words are adjectives).
From the physicality of the ward, please describe the importance of the corridor as your work space?
What in it do you view as an obstruction, and what function well as it is?
If any, please defne the diference in recovery outcome in patient between single and double room?
How could the patient room stimulate the involvement of relatives?
Other comments about the patient room environment
When do you use the common kitchen area?
PART 4 : OPENQUESTIONS
Thanks for your participation!
Once you have completed the questionnaire,
please submit it to the head of ward no later than 6 March 2013.
6/6
How would you describe the importance of the physical environment for the patient?
How the physical design in the ward afects the patients recovery?
Describe the ward with fve words (at least three of the words are adjectives).
From the physicality of the ward, please describe the importance of the corridor as your work space?
What in it do you view as an obstruction, and what function well as it is?
If any, please defne the diference in recovery outcome in patient between single and double room?
How could the patient room stimulate the involvement of relatives?
Other comments about the patient room environment
When do you use the common kitchen area?
PART 4 : OPENQUESTIONS
STAFF QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
Ages:
Under 30 years 8 = 38 %
30 - 39 years 6 = 28.6 %
40 - 49 years 3 = 14.3 %
50 - 59 years 2 = 9.5 %
60+ 1 = 4.8 %
Staff Questionnaire Result
How long have you been employed in the ward?
Under 1 year 2 = 9.5 %
1 - 3 4 = 19 %
4 - 10 11 = 52.4 %
Over 11 4 = 19 %
How long have you been involved with the process of
PCC?
Under 1 year 2 = 9.5 %
1 - 2 10 = 47.6 %
3 - 5 1 = 4.8 %
Over 5 years 0 = 0 %
No answer 11 = 52.4 %
Have you worked in another care development project
before?
Yes 4
No 5
No answer 2
Open Question
STAFF QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
Distributed = 41
Answered = 21
(13 nurses, 4 ass. nurses, 1 specialist nurse and 3
physicians)
169 168 STAFF QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
What is the essence of patient centered care?
26.5 % Patient is involved
14,7 % Assume patients problems and needs from their
stories
11.8 % Relationship between patient and staff
8.8 % The person behind the diseases
8.8 % Have the same goal
8.8 % Patients in focus
5.9 % Follow up
2.9 % 2.9 % Work on patients desires
2.9 % Do little extra
2.9 % Better contact/ communication with patients,
2.9 % No answer
Can you describe any changes in your routines
since the implementation of PCC?
11.1% More structure in monitoring
11.1% Spend longer time for arrival conversation
7.4 % Neutral, have only been working with PCC
7.4 % Find private place to talk with patient
7.4% Listen differently and more
3.7 % Better method for patient
3.7% More consideration of patients wishes
3.7 % Nurse and assistant nurse work for the same goal,
3.7% Easier to see patient need, resources and barriers
3.7% More preparation, make early plans
3.7% Use patients stories more
Do you see any improvements with the new
approach?
23.3% Patients satisfaction,
10% Shorter length of patients stay,
6.7% Make the process of discharge information easier
and smother,
6.7% More structured/ early planning, how long
patients stay will be,
6.7% Deep understanding of patients situation/
problems/ needs,
6.7% Doctor/ nurses should spend more time with
patients,
6.7% Better cooperation between staff,
3.3% Holistic image of patients,
3.3% Easier to rehabilitate,
3.3% Staff feels that patients recover,
3.3% Better plans for patient and staff,
3.3% Finding new solutions,
3.3% More infoldment for relatives,
3.7% Rather less routines
7.4% Decide together a preliminary prescription date-
3.7% Consistent team decision
3.7% Better to handle patients expectation/ goal/
concept/ activities levels
3.7% Person in focus
7.4% No answer
What are the major barriers which stand in the
way of implementation of PCC principles?
24.2% Not enough with time, stressful
12.1% Lack of staff
9% Senior physicians change patients treatment and
plans often
6% Old routines
6% Patients confusing (dementia)
6% Double documentation
6% Fear of change
3% Lack of private room for conversation
3% Single patient room
3% Everyone in the same corridor
3% No room for private conversation
3% Large galleries
3% New way of thinking for patients, not used to set
goals and have wishes,
3% Some patients dont have ability to explain their will,
3% Medical tasks often as a first priority
3% Journal system, doesnt work in reality
3% No answer
How does the environment of the work place
supports your work performance?
27.8% Lack of space/ tight hustle for efficient working
8.3% Long and tight corridor which force you to travel
a lot
5.6% Will be smother if the accessibility to patient room/
drug room/ help aid is close to each other
5.6% Good lighting
5.6% Lack of storage room
5.6% Messy environment
5.6% Havent enough with computers
2.8% Good ventilation
2.8% Strategist placement, less stress
2.8% Toilet should fit at least 2 persons
2.8% Doesnt effect much
2.8% Brighter corridor
2.8% More pleasant
2.8% No extra beds in rooms
2.8% Beautiful colours
2.8% Make you feel better
2.8% Big problems with 4 bedroom, not single/ double
2.8% Lack of space to sit with patients and talk
2.8% Big enough
5.6% No answer
STAFF QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
3.3% Easier to taking care a patient group,
6.7% No answer
171 170 STAFF QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
Does the physicality of the work place supports
or prevails the process of collaboration on
different levels:
Staff staff
52.4% Barrier: no meeting room; tight space, the
workplace is not good; need staff private room; need
bigger, brighter, good ventilation; the space is too small
to read a journal and working with computer; 4 beds
room is too tight.
38% answered Help
9.5% No answer
Staff patient:
66.6% Barrier: tight space; should have more of single
patient room; be private; 4 beds too tight; sensitive to
talk with patient.
23.8% Help
9.5% No answer
Patient relative
66.6% Barrier: single room should be bigger; tight
space; should have few meeting rooms, need a place
for the relative; 4 beds are not good; private room for
conversation/ do activities; the dayroom is too small & noisy.
23.8% Help
9.5% No answer
Staff relative
71.4% Barrier: No chance for a conversation;
tight space; conversation private area; hard to find a
place for private conversation.
19% Help
9.5% No answer
If you would like any changes or additions in the
physical space, what would they be? In what
way will they support affect your work routine?
15.3% No 4 beds room (max 2 beds)
8.2% A few private rooms for conversation
4.7% Single room
4,7% Better working area
4.7% Better storage area
3.5% Bigger patient room
3.5% Toilet in the room
3.5% Bigger spaces
3.5% More computer
3.5% Dimmer
3.5% No musculoskeletal injuries
3.5% Bigger and more patient WC
2.4% Less stress
2.4% Better working table
How would you describe the importance of the
physical environment for the patient?
19% Recharge, take arrest, recovery
14.3% Tight and untidy environment means unhappy
patients
9.5% Cozy, lighting, daylight, plants
9.5% Should have possibility to talk with staff
5.2% Important
4.8% Possibility to express than more talk
How the physical design in the ward affects the
patients recovery?
47.6% Yes
23,8% Big impact
14.3% Affect some agree
9.5% No answer
4.7% Not so much
2.4% Place for patient and relatives
2.4% Welcoming environment/ interior
2.4% Better solution than curtain between beds
2.4% Quite working area for documentation
1.2% Brighter
1.2% Better common area for patients
1.2% Nicer lighting 1.2% Dont need to turn off and on
all the lights at the same time
1.2% Effective working time
1.2% Less infection
1.2% More time for patients
1.2% Daylight
1.2% Less overcrowded
1.2% Not any long corridors
1.2% Doctor inside the ward, to increase communication
as a team
1.2% Medicine trolley close to the expedition
1.2% A bigger place for important help aids (gloves,
apron, wipes)
1.2% Ceiling lift in all the patient room
1.2% Better ventilation in the patient room
1.2% Plain colour of curtain
1.2% Better chairs for patients
1.2% Lighting at the window of patient room
1.2% Controlisation
1.2% A bigger, more modern and complete examination
room
4.8% More attractive environment, encourage people
to move around
4.8% Stimulating, inviting
4.8% Balance between stimulation, calm and peaceful,
4.8% For rehabilitation, comfortless, feeling that is it fresh,
4.8% Unhappy, hard to sleep, hard to talk with staff in
4 bedrooms
4.8% Dont know
STAFF QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
173 172 STAFF QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
2.6% Used to it
2.6% Big window in the end of the corridor
2.6% More colour/ painting
2.6% Easy to find
2.6% Doctor expedition outside the ward
Doesnt work so well
31.6% No room for help aid
23.7% Tight and small space
7.9% Too long
2.6% Ineffective space
2.6% Hard to find dayroom/ wc for patient
2.6% Noisy
2.6% Boring design
2.6% Too small storage
2.6% No answer
2.9% Stressful
2.9% Noisy/ high volume
2.9% Ugly
1.4% Empathy
1.4% Easy to find
1.4% Sterile
1.4% Inconsiderate room
1.4% Hard to work
1.4% Smelly
1.4% No privacy
1.4% Nice
1.4% Fairly modern
1.4% Good function
Single bed room
11.4% Variety depends on person, some recovery better
by contact with other and some wants to be alone
8.6% For person who are really sick
8.6% Quite
8.6% Sleep better
8.6% Isolated
2,9% More space for relatives
2.9% More safe
5.7% Some patient become more passive
5.7% Private
2.9% Good for old and young
Describe the ward with five words
18.6% Tight
8.7% Messy, chaotic
8.6% Long and tight corridor
7.1% Light
5.7% Positive atmosphere
5.7% Old
5.7% Good community
4.3% Dark
4.3% Muddy
4.3% Structured
2.9% Cold
Corridor
Works pretty well
7.9% Ok
6% Radio, TV, internet
3% More electrical outlet
3% The problem is 4 bed rooms
3% Sad
3% White
3% Tight
3% Hard to work, too many help aids
3% Single room with bathroom
3% Ceiling lift
3% Sliding door
3% Private wc/ shower
3% Separate rooms for men and female
When do you use the kitchen?
29.6 % Bring drink or something else for patient
18.5 % Setting food court
18.5 % Breakfast, lunch, dinner
18.5 % Make coffee
11.1 % Not often
7.4 % Almost never
3.7 % Heat up food
3.7 % To mobilize patients
3.7 % Cleaning the refrigerator
3.7 % Would like to have oven and stove
3.7 % Meeting staff
3.7 % Conversation with patients if its empty
3.7 % When its tidy
3.7 % Often, every break
3.7 % Never
STAFF QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
2.9% Satisfaction
2.9% Quite lonely
2.9% Dont know
2.9% No different
Double bed room
8.6% Good social contact
5.7% Meet with others
2.9% Best
2.9% Happier
How could the patient room stimulate the
involvement of relatives?
33.3% Dont know
25% Natural places for meetings
12.5% Private single rooms that are big and beautiful
8.3% Information board
8.3% Private sink, wc, shower in each room
4.2% Books/ files of facts
4.2% No stimulation, not so good to visit
4.2% Help aids
Other comments about the patient room
environment
30.3% No more comment
9.1% Bigger spaces
6% Old bed, wanted the one with remote control
6% Better lightning
6% Bad place for help aid
175 174
Feature Visions for Healthcare Housing and Work
HOSPITAL ARCHITECTURE AS AN ACTIVE MEDICINE
We are architect students at Chalmers doing our thesis about
how the environment could be adapted to support a person-centered care.
The goal of this project is to understand
how the ward environment can be more supportive for patients, families, and staf.
This is an inquiry form that will not have any impact on your daily care.
Your participation in the survey is completely voluntary
and you can at any time choose to cancel without giving reasons.
If you have any questions, please contact
Bilyana Docheva eller Sophy Sapan Longe Olsson
email: bilyana@student.chalmers.se, sophy@student.chalmers.se
The questionnaire will be available for a perioud of two weeks.
Once the questionnaire is completed please submit it to the head of ward no later than 6 March 2013.
Integrating architecture as a vital healing element in patient treatment -
bridging the gap between research, users and architects
Bilyana Docheva
Sophy Sapan Longe Olsson
1/4
Feature Visions for Healthcare Housing and Work
HOSPITAL ARCHITECTURE AS AN ACTIVE MEDICINE
We are architect students at Chalmers doing our thesis about
how the environment could be adapted to support a person-centered care.
The goal of this project is to understand
how the ward environment can be more supportive for patients, families, and staf.
This is an inquiry form that will not have any impact on your daily care.
Your participation in the survey is completely voluntary
and you can at any time choose to cancel without giving reasons.
If you have any questions, please contact
Bilyana Docheva eller Sophy Sapan Longe Olsson
email: bilyana@student.chalmers.se, sophy@student.chalmers.se
The questionnaire will be available for a perioud of two weeks.
Once the questionnaire is completed please submit it to the head of ward no later than 6 March 2013.
Integrating architecture as a vital healing element in patient treatment -
bridging the gap between research, users and architects
Bilyana Docheva
Sophy Sapan Longe Olsson
1/4
PATIENT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
2/4
PART 1 : PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
1.1 THE DESIGN OF THE PATIENT ROOM (mark with a cross) :
supports private conversations
support safety
facilitates your personalization adjustment
supports your chance for a good night's sleep
allows for a good communication between
you and stafs
provides a better environment for relatives
has adequate day light source
has sufcient lighting for various needs
allows visual contact with the patients
has access to physical contact with nature
1.2 THE DESIGN OF THE CORRIDOR :
makes it easy to move
gives adequate daylight
SINGLE
stimulates your mobility
supports private conversations
is attractive (feel, appearance, atmosphere)
gives opportunities to control the environment
(light, temperature, equipment)
MULTIBEDS
agree disagree strongly disagree
Please rate the following
statements by marking in this way:
strongly agree
1
1
2 2 2 1
1 4 2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
2 1
2 4 1
1 6
3 3 1
2 3 1 1
1 3 1 2
1 4 2
3 3 1
1 4 2
1 4 2
1 2 1 3
1 4 1 1
4
3 2
3 2 2 1
1 7
100%
62,5%
37,5% 62,5%
37,5%
0%
+ -
PATIENT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
177 176
3/4
1.3 THE DESIGN OF THE KITCHEN :
supports relationship between patient and staf
supports relationship between patient and relatives
makes it easy to move
is attractive (feel, appearance, atmosphere)
gives adequate daylight
has views of nature
gives opportunities to control the environment
(light, temperature, equipment)
DEL 2 : FRGOR
What is your daily routine while in the hospital?
What makes you feel good in your daily routine in the ward?
What do you miss in the physical space of the room?
If you would like any changes, additions which you fnd vital in the physical space, what would they be?
agree disagree strongly disagree
Please rate the following
statements by marking in this way:
strongly agree
1 1 4
2 2 2
2 2 2
2 1 3
2 1 3
4 2
4 1 1
50%
50%
50%
50%
100%
62,5%
62,5%
50%
50%
50%
50%
0%
37,5%
37,5%
+ -
PATIENT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
4/4
Please describe patient room, using fve words?
Other comments about the patient room environment?
How important for you are relatives visitation?
Where do you usually meet with relatives while in the hospital?
When do you use the common kitchen area? For what kind of purpose?
Thanks for your participation!
Once you have completed the questionnaire,
please submit it to the staf no later than 6 March 2013.
4/4
Please describe patient room, using fve words?
Other comments about the patient room environment?
How important for you are relatives visitation?
Where do you usually meet with relatives while in the hospital?
When do you use the common kitchen area? For what kind of purpose?
Thanks for your participation!
Once you have completed the questionnaire,
please submit it to the staf no later than 6 March 2013.
PATIENT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
179 178
Distributed = 10
Answered = 9 - 1 error = 8 persons
(single room = 1 persons, double room = 4 persons,
both single and double = 1 person and 4 bed room =
2 persons)
Patient Questionnaire Result
What is your daily routine while in the hospital?
1: No answer.
2: Wait for medicine.
B: Wait for breakfast medicine, go out for a walk in the
nature, lunch, be around the hospital, caf/ kitchen/ his
new room, take a rest, go to toilet, no fixed routine.
4: Take a rest, wake up, control/ sample, breakfast, take
a rest, lunch, take a rest, control, take a rest, dinner, take
a rest, sleep.
Open Question
What makes you feel good in your daily routine
in the ward?
1: Feel safe close to nurses, own toilet/ shower, internet
connection, good reading lamp, TV.
2: The nice treatment from staff, friendly staff, other
person who I share room with, when the food is served
at certain time.
B: Nothing, except the thought of coming home.
4: Feel that the staff cares, TV.
PATIENT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
What do you miss in the physical space of the
room?
1: coffeemaker, microwave, TV that works, modern bed
2: electric outlet close to bed, internet connection, to
contact family via webcam, shower/ WC, calm
B: calm and quiet
4: TV, lightning in normal strength
If you would like any changes, additions which
you find vital in the physical space, what would
they be?
1: Bed, TV and radio with headset control
2: Be alone, WC inside for hygienic reason, nothing to
change, few of electrical outlet on headwall.
B: Acoustic, better ventilation, its stressful to move
around, especially when you are sick
4: Better ventilation control
Please describe patient room, using five words?
1: Old bed, no radio, TV dosent work properly, light,
big window, comfortable bed
2: Noisy for other patients, little bit tight, cold, white,
sterile, tasteless, nice space, small, cosy, well equipped,
no privacy
3: Open, disclosure, irritating, noisy
4: Sterile, bright, nice view, tight, bright, boring,
sensitively, tight, sterile
Other comments about the patient room
environment?
1: Big reading chair, boring environment
2: The bed needs to clean more often, no daylight on
his/ her spot
3: The room is often open, cold, feel disclosure and
constantly noise
4: No answer
How important for you are relatives visitation?
60% Very important
30% Important
10% No answer
Where do you usually meet with relatives while
in the hospital?
33.3% Day room
26.7% Patient room
20% Cafeteria
20% Kitchen
When do you use the kitchen?
40% Never
20% When I want to eat
20% Meet relatives
10% When I want to drink
10% When I want
PATIENT QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
181 180
On reading
References
Apple, Mike. (2012). A Handbook on Facility Follow-Up & Examples of its Application in Evaluating
Intensive Care Patient Rooms. Gothenburg: Chalmers University of Technology.
Asksen,Jenny. (2012). Designprocess frn ett aktivitetsperspektiv-en bredare syn p tillgnglighet.
Gothenburg: Chalmers University of Technology.
Benkel, Inger, M.S.W., Ph.D.; Helle Wijk, R.N., R.N.T., Ph.D. and Ulla Molander, M.D., Ph.D. (2012). Hospital
Staff Opinions Concerning Loved Ones Understanding of the Patients Life-Limiting Disease and the Loved
Ones Need for Support. Journal Of Palliative Medicine, Volume 15, Number 1. Mary Ann Liebert,
Inc. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0297
Brown, Cynthia J., David T Redden, Kellie L Flood, Richard M Allman (2009). The underecognized epidemic
of low mobility during hospitalization of older adults. Birmingham/Atlanta: The American Geriatrics Society
Carlsson, Dennis (2012). Architecture and Multimodal Stimulation In Neuro Intensive Care. Master Thesis
at Chalmers Architecture.
Chaudhury, Habib; Atiya Mahmood and Maria Valente. (2003). The Use of Single Patient Rooms vs.
Multiple Occupancy Rooms in Acute Care Environments. Canada: Simon Fraser University.
Coe, Rodney M. (1970). Sociology of Medicine. New York, London: Mc Graw-Hill Book Company.
Crandall, Lynda G; Diana L. White; Sherrie Schuldheis and Karen Amann Talerico. (November 2007).
Initiating Person-centered care Practices in Long-Term Care Facilities. Journal of Gerontological nursing,
47 55.
Daab. (2006). Medical Design. Kln: Ralf Daab Publishers.
Dr. Rosemary Gates Campos RN, PhD. (October 1994). Rocking and Pacifiers: Two Comforting
Interventions for Heelstick Pain. Research in Nursing & Health, Volume 17, Issue 5, pages 321331.
Edvardsson, J. David; Per-Olof Sandman and Birgit Holriz Rasmussen (2005). Sensing an atmosphere of
ease: a tentative theory of supportive care settings. Sweden: Department of Nursing, Umea University.
Ekman I, et al, (2011). Person-centered care Ready for prime time, European Society of Cardiology.
doi:10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2011.06.008
Folmer, Mette B; Mullin, Michale F. Healing Architecture - Space for Relations. Arkitektur og Medieteknologi,
Aalborg Universitet, Danmark
Foster, S. (1989) Analysis of Spatial Patterns in Buildings (access analysis) as an Insight Into Social Structure:
Examples from The Scottish Atlantic Iron Age. Antiquity, 63 (238). pp. 40-50.
Books, Articles, Journals
REFERENCES
183 182
Books, Articles, Journals
Hamilton, D. Kirk ; David H. Watkins (2009). Evidence-Based Design for Multiple Building Types. New
Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Hamilton, DK. (November 2003). The four levels of Evidence Based practice, Healthcare Design, 18-26.
Hansen, Helle Ploug;Tine Tjrnhj-Thomsen and Christoffer Johansen. (2011). Rehabilitation interventions for
cancer survivors: The influence of context. Denmark: Informa Healthcare doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2010.529460.
Hendrich, Ann L.; Joy Fay and Amy K. Sorrells (January 2004). Effects Of Acuity-Adaptable Rooms On
Flow Of Patients And Delivery Of Care. American Journal Of Critical Care, Volume 13, No. 1
Herman Miller Healthcare (2010). Patient Rooms: A Changing Scene of Healing Research. Rep. Print. 1-10.
Johansson, Anna Klara; Malin Ramstedt and Sandra Strm. (2012). Out of The Woods:New Surgery and
Research Centre at stra Sjukhuset, Gothenburg. Gothenburg: Chalmers University of Technology.
Jokiniemi, Caroline and Christine Tam (2012). Beyond White Walls: The healing environment of a patient
hotel. Gothenburg: Chalmers University of Technology.
Jones, W. (1995). Acute Care Design: Emerging Trends. In Innovations in Healthcare Design: Selected
Presentations from the First Five Symposia on Healthcare Design, edited by S. O. Marberry, 12-20. New
York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Kayan, Cagil (2011). Neuro-architecture: Enriching healthcare environments for Children. Gothenburg:
Master Thesis at Chalmers Architecture.
Locum. (2011). Konceptprogram Fr Rum P Vrdaveldning. The Stockholm County Council: Locum.
Lynch, Kevin (1960). The Image of the City. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Malone, Eileen B and Barbara A. Dellinger (May 2011). Furniture Design Features and Healthcare
Outcomes. The Centre for Healthcare Design.
Martin, Cat. (2005). The Surface Texture Book. London: Thames & Hudson Ltd.
McCullough, Cynthia (ed.) (2010). Evidence-based design for healthcare facilities. Indianapolis: Sigma
Theta Tau International.
Melin, Andres (2012) Nrsjukhiset-fysisk struktur fr patientfokuserad vrd.. Chalmers: Gteborg.
Meuser, Philipp (ed). (2010). Construction and Design Manual Medical Practices. Berlin: DOM Publishers.
Mondo (2011). Healthcare Rubber Flooring Guide. Canada: Mondo America Inc.
Mounier E. (1952). Personalism. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Nicolson, Kate (2013). Personal Space: Interior design approaches to bedrooms in mental health
developments. Edinburgh: Architecture and Design Scotland.
Nightingale, F. (1863). Notes on Hospitals. London: Longman, Green, Longman, Roberts, and Green.
REFERENCES
NKS frvaltningen. (2011). Det ljusa sjukhuset Nya Karolinska Solna I ord och bild. Stockholm lns landsting.
Noblis. (2009). The EBD Checklist: A Tool for Institutionalizing Evidence-Based Design in the Military
Health System. Georgia Technology College of Architecture.
Nolan, Mike R; Sue Davis; Jayne Brown; John Keady; Janet Nolan. (2004). Beyond person-centred
care: a new vision for gerontological nursing. UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Olsson, L.E. (2006). Patients with acute hip fractures motivation, effectiveness and costs in two different
care systems. Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
Pallasmaa, Juhani (2012) The Eyes of The Skin. Great Britain : TJ International, Ltd.
Parameswaran, Lekshmy and Jeroen Raijmakers. (2010). People-focused Innovation in Healthcare.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Sadler, Blair L.; Leonard L. Berry; Robin Guenther; D. Kirk Hamilton; Frederick A. Hessler; Clayton Merritt
and Derek Parker. (2011). Fable Hospital 2.0: The Business Case for Building Better Health Care Facilities..
Hastings Center Report, Volume 41, No 1.
Sahlqvist, Kristina; Pamela Lindgren; Michael Nilsson (2008-2010). Rapport om Konstnrliga
Utvecklingsprojekt. Gteborg: Gothenburg University.
Schorr, J. A. 1(993). Music and pattern change in chronic pain. Advances in Nursing Science, 15, 4,
2736.
Steen, Jesper & Daniel Koch. (2012). Samspelet p vrdavdelningen. Stockholm: KTH Artitektur och
Samhllsbyggnad.
Straus, Eugene W., and Alex Straus (2006). Medical Marvels: The 100 Greatest Advances in Medicine.
Amherst: Prometheus Books.
Suciu, Ramona Nicoleta; Lucia Daina; Anca Chereji; Annamaria Pallag. (2010). The Role Of The Hospital
Environment In The Management Of The Hospitalized Patient. University of Oradea Faculty of Medicine
and Pharmacy.
U.S. Green Building Council (2010). LEED for Healthcare New Construction and Major Renovations.
Washington: USGBC Inc.
Ulrich, R. and Gilpin, L. (2003). Healing arts - nutrition for the soul. In: Charmel, P. M. Frampton, S. B. and
Gilpin, L. (eds.) Putting Patients First - Designing and Practicing Patient Centred Care, San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass, 117-146.
Ulrich, R. S. (2000b). Evidence based environmental design for improving medical outcomes. Proceedings
of the conference, Healing By Design: Building for Health Care in the 21st Century. Montreal: McGill
University Health Centre, 3.1-3.10.
REFERENCES
185 184
Media, Internet
Ulrich, Roger S; Craig Zimring, PhD; Xuemei Zhu; Jennifer DuBose, MS; Hyun-Bo Seo; Young-Seon Choi;
Xiaobo Quan ;Anjali Joseph. (2008). Healthcare Leadership, A Review of the Research Literature on
Evidence-Based Healthcare Design. HERD (Health Environments Research And Design Journal), Vol. 1,
No. 3. Ulrich, Roger S. Ph.D. Effects of Interior Design on Wellness : Theory and Recent Scientific Research.
Journal of Healthcare Interior Design, 97 - 109.
Van Laarhoven, H. (2010). Innovation in Healthcare Holland. Orbis Medical and Care Concern.
Verderber, Stephen (2000). Healthcare Architecture In an Era of Radical Transformation.. New Haven:
Yale University Press.
Wagenaar, Cor (ed.). (2006). The Architecture of Hospitals. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers.
Watson, Nancy M., PhD, RN; Thelma J. Wells, PhD, RN, FAAN and Christopher Cox,PhD. (1998). Rocking
Chair Therapy for Dementia Patients: Its effect on Psychosocial Well-being and Balance. Sage Journals
doi: 10.1177/153331759801300605.
Wijk, Helle (2001). Colour Perception in Old Age. Gothenburg: Gothenburg University.
Wolf, Axel (2012). Person-centred Care: Possibilities, barriers and effects in hospitalised patients.
Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.
Young, J. (2007). A summary of color in healthcare environments: A critical review of the research literature.
Healthcare Design, 7(7), 2223.
Books, Articles, Journals
Anell, Anders Anell; Anna H Glenngrd; Sherry Merkur. (2012). Sweden: Health System Review. Denmark:
WHO Regional Office for Europe. http://www.euro.who.int/_ _ data/assets/pdf_file/0008/164096/e96455.
pdf
Burpee, Heather (2008). History of Heathcare Architecture. Seattle: Integrated Design lab Puget Sound.
http://www.mahlum.com/pdf/HistoryofHealthcareArchBurpee.pdf
Chalmers centrum fr vrdens arkitektur, PTS. (2011) Den goda vrdavdelningen. Gteborg: Chalmers.
Cullinan, Kevin and Martha Wolf. (2010) The Patient Room: what is the ideal solution? Design Dilemma
Project from http://iwsp.human.cornell.edu/fle_uploads/IWSP_4530_2010_DILEMMA_Wolf-Callinan.pdf
REFERENCES
Department of Veterans Affairs (2005). Interior Signs. From http://vacriteria.tpub.com/sign06/sign060009.
htm
Disabled Living Foundation (2006). Choosing toilet equipment and accessories. London: Disabled Living
Foundation from http://www.dlf.org.uk/factsheets/Choosing_toilet_equipment_and_accessories_sponsored.pdf
Foltz, Mark A. Design Principles for Wayfinding from http://www.ai.mit.edu/projects/infoarch/publications/
mfoltz-thesis/node8.html
Gates, Rosemary Campos (1994). Rocking and pacifiers: Two comforting interventions for heelstick pain.
Research in Nursing & Health Volume 17, Issue 5, pages 321331.
Hamilton, C; S Hinks and M Petticrew. (2003). Arts for health: still searching for the Holy Grail. J Epidemiol
Community Health, 57:401402. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1732481/pdf/v057p00401.
pdf
IDEO. Human Centered Design ToolKit 2nd Edition from http://www.hcdconnect.org/toolkit/en
IDEO. (2011). Sacred Care For St. Joseph Health. http://www.ideo.com/
Interdisciplinarity in Built Environment Procurement (2007). Patient-Centred Care and Evidence-Based
Design: Key Issues in a Collaborative Process.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. (January 2009). Universal Design for
Health Care Facilities Addressing Safety, Access to Care for a Diverse Patient Population. Environment of
Care News, Volume 12, Issue 1, 8-11.
Lundin, Stefan; Lena From (ed) (2010). Architecture as Medicine the Importance of Architecture for
Treatment Outcomes in Psychiatry. Uppsala: The Architecture Research Foundation.
Mahlum (2009). Healthcare Design Insights. Issues 01: Seattle, Portland. http://www.mahlum.com/pdf/
MahlumHDIAutumn2009Issue01.pdf
Mahlum (2012). Healthcare Design Insights. Issues 05: Seattle, Portland.
Mumford, Stephen. (2012). Art versus Science? http://blogs.nottingham.ac.uk/artsmatters/2012/03/06/art-
versus-science/
Mota, Catarina (2012). Play with smart materials from http://www.ted.com/talks/catarina_mota_play_with_
smart_materials.html
Media, Internet
REFERENCES
187 186
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. (2004). Evidence-Based Hospital Design Improves Healthcare
Outcomes For Patients, Families and Staff. Concord: The Center for Health Design. http://www.rwjf.
org/en/about-rwjf/newsroom/newsroom-content/2004/06/evidence-based-hospital-design-improves-
healthcare-outcomes-for-.html
Starfield, Barbara. (2011). Is Patient-Centered Care the same as Person-Focused Care? The Permanente
Journal. 15(2): 6369. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3140752/
Thomas, Lauren (2010). Flexibility & Adaptability in Hospital Design & Construction.. Design Dilemma
Project from http://iwsp.human.cornell.edu/fle_uploads/IWSP_4530_2010_DILEMMA_Thomas.pdf
Ulrich, R. & Zimring, C. (2004). The role of the physical environment in the hospital of the 21st century. The
Center for Health Design. http://www.healthdesign.org/chd/research/role-physical-environment-hospital-
21st-century-abstracts-table-supplement.
Ulrich, Roger S. Ph.D. Effects of Healthcare Environmental Design on Medical Outcomes. International
Academy for Design and Health, 49-59. http://treebenefits.terrasummit.com/Documents/Health/
Effects%20of%20Healthcare%20environments.pdf
University of Gothenburg. (2012). stra Hospital / Emergency and Cardiovacular Medicine. Gothenburg:
The Sahlgrenska Academy. http://www.medicine.gu.se/english/mkm/ostra/
Veterans Health Administration. (2012). VA Signage Design Guide. Washington: US Department of Veterans
Affairs. http://www.cfm.va.gov/til/signs/Signage01-Intro.pdf
Watson, Nancy M, Ph.D.; Thelma J. Wells, Ph.D and Christopher Cox, Ph.D. Rocking chair therapy for
dementia patients: Its effect on psychosocial well-being and balance. New York. SAGE JOURNALS from
http://aja.sagepub.com
Wolf, Axel. (2013). Person Centred Care. Gothenburg: GPCC.. http://www.gpcc.gu.s
Media, Internet
REFERENCES
CVA Healthcare Seminar (2012). Chalmers: Gothenburg.
Edvardsson, J. David (2013). PCC Half day seminar. GPCC: Gothenburg.
Hamilton, Kirk and Roger Ulrich. (2012). Evidence-Based Practice Workshop. Chalmers: Gothenburg.
Workshop, seminar
Photos
http://c214206.r6.cf3.rackcdn.com/files/profiles/3388/header/600:w/GynkologischePraxis_ Brilon.
http://c214210.r10.cf3.rackcdn.com/files/projects/35064/images/500:w/01_ GynkologischePraxis.jpg
http://www.fastcodesign.com/multisite_ files/codesign/imagecache/inline-large/
Lundin, Stefan; Lena From (ed) (2010). Architecture as Medicine the Importance of Architecture for
Treatment Outcomes in Psychiatry. Uppsala: The Architecture Research Foundation.
??
http://www.home-designing.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Neutral-dining-room.jpg
http://www.centroarchitecture.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Beautiful-Stunning-and-Awesome-
Ceiling-Murals-with-Gorgeous-Blue-Sky-
NKS frvaltningen. (2011). Det ljusa sjukhuset Nya Karolinska Solna I ord och bild. Stockholm lns landsting.
http://www.newrch.vic.gov.au/assets/374/1/
http://www.csm-office.com.au/wp-content/uploads/xray-storage_ 3-430x315.jpg
http://static.dezeen.com/uploads/2012/06/dezeen_ Childrens-Hospital-Zurich-by-Herzog-and-
deMeuron_1_ 784.jpg
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ BrR _LGKAN60/S--heUUHKAI/AAAAAAAAAB4/MkwI8rTx8t4/s1600/
Other photos : from a credited source or by the author.
REFERENCES
Process of Patient Room Modules (Longe-Olsson, 2013)