Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Complaints management is not just about dealing with and resolving individual complaints.
It is also about adding value by using complaints data, individually or in the aggregate, to identify areas where the agencys business processes and systems can be improved.
Cultural factors such as pro or anti- business attitudes or agencies or officers with particular agendas (including regulatory capture whereby regulatory agencies get too close to the agencies they are supposed to be regulating), leading to biased decisions.
However, a significant one-off error may, when investigated, be traced back to a systemic problem (e.g. lack of training or resourcing).
Cl. 7.5(c) of the Directive requires agency complaints management systems to have: mechanisms and strategies in place to provide feedback to relevant areas of the agency where potential system improvements are identified. This is discussed briefly in Fact Sheet 8 - Feedback, and in more detail below.
Use complaints to improve your organisation. Always ask: how could this complaint have been avoided?
Useful tip
Systemic issues
As the name implies, systemic issues relate to problems with an agencys systems, as opposed to one-off mistakes that due to human error can occur even with the best systems in place. Systemic problems can include: Inappropriate or inadequate legislation, which e.g prevents an agency from dealing with matters efficiently and effectively or achieving the Acts objectives or government policy. Inadequate or non-existent policies, which dont give clear guidance as to how to handle certain situations, leading to uncertainty and inconsistency. Inappropriate or inadequate delegations, causing either delays (due to inadequate delegation e.g. too many internal levels of approval), or incompetence (excessive delegation to staff who are out of their depth). Inadequate or non-existent supervision and controls, causing for example inconsistency and variable standards or outcomes. Inappropriate or inadequate training, causing errors or delays as staff are unable to do their job properly. Inadequate funding and other resourcing, causing e.g. delays or under skilled staff. Poor record keeping, causing factual mistakes and inability to explain decisions. Poor communication or explanation of decisions and actions, leading to unnecessary complaints.
The key to gaining business improvement from your complaints management system lies in having a systematic and reliable approach to recording complaints and their outcomes in sufficient detail to allow analysis of where and why complaints are being made. How you approach the task of collecting complaints information will depend upon the business and structure of your organisation. As discussed in Fact Sheet 10 - Resources, centralised and systematic recording of complaints information and outcomes is particularly important if your agency has a Queensland-wide presence and regional offices handle complaints. Information and communication technology offers great advantages, particularly in detecting recurring issues and themes among large numbers of complaints. A well constructed and well maintained paper based system can also work effectively for centralised agencies or agencies generating low complaint numbers. The amount of information that can be collected from complaints is considerable. A complaints form (sample attached) is a key business improvement tool for recording important details for analysis of trends over time. This form illustrates the type of information needed to resolve complaints and evaluate and improve services. Your form needs to be user-friendly for complainants and staff. Check boxes work best when people are busy or recording common complaints. For types of useful data see Fact Sheet 10 - Resources.
If your analysis indicates possible problems in a particular area this information can be fed back to the relevant personnel, thus leading to investigation, rectification and business improvement, before the problem escalates and reaches crisis point. This is a major return on your investment in complaints management.
An experienced officer should review and analyse the data produced by the system. Systems can go only so far, and the data needs to be interpreted by people who understand it and the organisation. When complaints information is classified and analysed, systemic and recurring problems will be more easily identified. However, reports should not be totally quantitative. While it is true systemic problems often generate a run of complaints that reveal the problem, a single complaint can also reveal a systemic problem, which if acted upon may avoid further similar complaints. Ideally, analyses and reports for policy makers and management should: set out complaint numbers and outcomes for different complaint types with subcategories (the structure can be modified through experience over time); measure achievement against agency standards; provide comparisons with previous periods; identify comparative data by reference to business units (e.g. regional offices) - but be wary of drawing conclusions unless all variables are known and properly taken into account; include analysis of the main complaints areas to explain basic figures and highlight significant points; identify any hotspots (i.e. actual or potential problem areas);
Level 25, 288 Edward Street Brisbane Queensland GPO Box 3314 Brisbane Queensland 4001 Tel 07 3005 7000 Fax 07 3005 7067 Email ombudsman@ombudsman.qld.gov.au Web www.ombudsman.qld.gov.au
A collaborative approach
A common thread may link other organisations with yours. Your responsibilities may cross over with others, or another agency may deliver some of your customer services. Perhaps a number of agencies have similar multicultural programs and a joint approach may be beneficial for all parties. Collaborative arrangements can result in many business benefits, such as improved services and shared costs. When developing formal or informal partnership agreements, build in arrangements to manage complaints and gain customer feedback to improve business performance. You may need to develop a stand-alone system to manage complaints arising from the shared initiative, particularly if the parties to the agreement have diverse complaints management models. However, with careful planning at the outset, it is possible to set up database links, common complaint categories and standardised reporting on complaints. This will make the complaints management system compatible with your agencys business improvement policies. The trend to public participation in government decisionmaking suggests that strengthening relations with your customers by investing in effective complaints management systems would be a sound investment.
Useful tip
PERSONAL DETAILS
Title: Last name: First name/s Address: _______________________________________________________________________Postcode: __________ Telephone (home): __________________work):________________________(mobile): ___________________________ Other ways to contact you (e.g. facsimile, email): __________________________________________________________ Preferred way for us to contact you: ____________________________________________________________________ Are you the person affected by the complaint? Yes No If not, please advise relationship to the person affected by the complaint: Parent Friend Other (please specify) ___________________________________________ If you are acting on someones behalf, please advise his or her details: Title: ________ Last name: ___________________ First name/s: _________________________Address: ______________________________________________________ Postcode:___________ Telephone (home): __________________(work):________________(mobile): _______________ Does the person affected by the complaint have a disability or other special need that we need to be aware of? Yes No If yes, please specify:
COMPLAINT DETAILS
Have you raised your complaint with us before? Yes No If yes, tell us who you spoke to, what you were told and why you are still dissatisfied. Attach any documentation you have from your previous contact. Use a separate sheet if needed.
For NEW complaints, tell us what happened? Who was involved? When and where did it happen? For example, does your complaint involve a decision or action that impacted on you, or perhaps the quality of our service? Make sure you tell us the specific area the problem occurred, particularly for regional services. Attach a separate sheet if needed.
Have you done anything about your complaint already? Perhaps you have sought assistance from a solicitor, professional advisor, an MP, or an investigative agency? If yes, please advise details, such as the person you spoke to, when and advice given:
WHAT TO EXPECT
We take complaints seriously. We will contact you within seven working days of receiving your complaint to advise you of what we will do and the expected time it will take. Your information will be treated confidentially. Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention.
Agencies:
Outline your timeframe for responding
Agencies:
Outline receival process relevant to your system
Ministerial
Agencies: Complaint referred to: Area Manager Team Leader Complaints Coordinator Other (please specify):
Date of referral:
File number:
Summary of any further advice provided to complainant about the referral (e.g. time lines for further advice):
Nature of complaint (may fall into more than one category): Customer service Policy Public interest disclosure Other (specify): Location of problem: Northern region Central records Other (specify): Southern region Corporate Services Legal services Agencies: Administrative decision/action Procedures Service delivery Ministerial
Agencies:
Complexity (estimated resources/time for complaint to be resolved): Prioritising complaints helps to identify the best approach
Priority: Low Action taken: Meeting with complainant Other (specify): Internal referral (where and when): External referral (where and when): Phone call to complainant Investigation Medium High
Outcome of action: Resolved Withdrawn Rejected (state reason): Unresolved otherwise (state reason): Agencies: select relevant titles Complaints Coordinator Regional Director Partly resolved Discontinued by complainant Deferred Unknown
Complainant satisfaction: Was complainant satisfied with the outcome of the complaint? Was complainant satisfied with the handling of the complaint? Yes Yes No No Unknown Unknown
Remedy: Admission/Acknowledgement of fault Apology Change of decision Change of law Compensation Restitution/waiver of debt/goodwill gift Protection of complainants/whistleblowers Return of property inappropriately held Technical assistance Change of policy/procedures/practice/product Service improvement Honouring of prior commitment Information that assists Promise not to repeat action/error Correction of misleading/incorrect records Repair/rework Substitute product or service Explanation of why problem occurred and what steps your agency is taking to avoid it recurring. Other (specify):
Systemic change required? If yes Legislation Policy Delegations Other (please specify): Supervision/control Training Resourcing
Identifying system improvements prevents similar problems occurring Record keeping Communication Culture
To be completed by complaints supervisor (e.g. Complaints Coordinator, Supervisor, Area Manager) Name: Phone: Date complaint received: Position: Email: Date finalised:
Yes
No
Partly
Date file closed: Details kept for trend analysis and prevention of similar problems