Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
In most internal audits, interviews with operating personnel and others play an important role as a major source of audit evidence. In many audits, the audit interview will be the prime source of facts, opinions and ideas.
In most internal audits, interviews with operating personnel and others play an important role as a prime source of audit evidence. In many audits, the audit interview will be the prime source of facts, opinions and ideas. While evidence obtained through audit interviews will usually require substantiation from other sources, interviews remain a valuable source of audit evidence and often determine the direction that the audit will take.
at the planning stage, to gather background information to assist in planning the nature, extent and timing of the testing to be performed;
(contd)
Interviewing can be carried out at any time during the audit, but is primarily performed at four stages:
1.
2.
at the planning stage, to gather background information to assist in planning the nature, extent and timing of the testing to be performed; during the main part of the evidence-gathering stage, to provide evidence as to the actual conditions in existence;
(contd)
Interviewing can be carried out at any time during the audit, but is primarily performed at four stages:
1.
2.
3.
at the planning stage, to gather background information to assist in planning the nature, extent and timing of the testing to be performed; during the main part of the evidence-gathering stage, to provide evidence as to the actual conditions in existence; at the end of the evidence-gathering phase, to confirm the auditors understanding of the situation and obtain clarification of issues; and
(contd)
Interviewing can be carried out at any time during the audit, but is primarily performed at four stages:
at the planning stage, to gather background information to assist in planning the nature, extent and timing of the testing to be performed; during the main part of the evidence-gathering stage, to provide evidence as to the actual conditions in existence; at the end of the evidence-gathering phase, to confirm the auditors understanding of the situation and obtain clarification of issues; and at the end of the audit (during the exit conference) to discuss issues, recommendations, and the audit report with the manager of the unit that was audited.
2. 3.
4.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Plan and prepare for the interview. Schedule the interview. Open or begin the interview, setting the stage for a free flow of information. Conduct the interview; gather facts. Close the interview by bringing it to an effective and positive conclusion. Document the interview as audit evidence. Evaluate the evidence from the interview by collaboration from other sources.
17
the information.
4. End by telling the interviewee that their
18
Managing Conflict
1. 2.
19
Topic 6.3
20
22
document the results of the audit work; provide a framework for management action;
23
24
document the results of the audit work; provide a framework for management action; present the views of the management of the unit that was audited; provide a basis for follow-up work by the internal auditor; express an opinion on the adequacy of governance, risk management and control within the organization.
26
27
A signed, written report should be issued when the audit examination is complete.
28
(contd)
A signed, written report should be issued when the audit examination is complete. The internal auditor should discuss conclusions and recommendations with appropriate levels of management before issuing the final report.
29
(contd)
3.
A signed, written report should be issued when the audit examination is complete. The internal auditor should discuss conclusions and recommendations with appropriate levels of management before issuing the final report. Reports should be accurate, objective, clear, concise, constructive, complete, and timely.
30
10
(contd)
3. 4.
A signed, written report should be issued when the audit examination is complete. The internal auditor should discuss conclusions and recommendations with appropriate levels of management before issuing the final report. Reports should be accurate, objective, clear, concise, constructive, complete and timely. Reports should present the purpose, scope, and results of the audit and, where appropriate, an expression of the auditors opinion.
31
(contd)
Reports may include recommendations for potential improvements and acknowledge satisfactory performance and corrective action.
32
(contd)
6.
Reports may include recommendations for potential improvements and acknowledge satisfactory performance and corrective action. The auditees views about audit conclusions and recommendations may be included in the report to demonstrate fairness and respect for the auditee.
33
11
(contd)
6.
7.
Reports may include recommendations for potential improvements and acknowledge satisfactory performance and corrective action. The auditees views about audit conclusions and recommendations may be included in the report to demonstrate fairness and respect for the auditee. The chief audit executive or a nominee should review and approve the final report before it is issued and decide to whom it will be distributed.
34
(contd)
6.
7.
8.
Reports may include recommendations for potential improvements and acknowledge satisfactory performance and corrective action. The auditees views about audit conclusions and recommendations may be included in the report to demonstrate fairness and respect for the auditee. The chief audit executive or a nominee should review and approve the final report before it is issued and decide to whom it will be distributed. Auditors may issue an opinion on risks and controls for the overall organization.
35
(contd)
The IIA recently issued a Practice Guide on Formulating and Expressing Internal Audit Opinions (Online Reading 6.3-1). It was written in the context of increasing requirements that internal auditors provide opinions as to the state of governance, risk management, and control within their organizations. This reading contains useful information concerning the use of grades or rankings when expressing an opinion.
36
12
37
background information;
38
background information; the purpose and scope of the engagement (including the audit objectives);
39
13
background information; the purpose and scope of the engagement (including the audit objectives); the results of the audit, including a) observations b) conclusions (opinions) c) recommendations d) action plans (agreed with management).
40
Nature of the observation (also referred to as the condition or finding). This states the actual situation as observed by the auditor.
42
14
(contd)
2.
Nature of the observation (also referred to as the condition or finding). This states the actual situation as observed by the auditor. Criteria used to assess performance. This provides the standard against which the observation is compared.
43
(contd)
2. 3.
Nature of the observation (also referred to as the condition or finding). This states the actual situation as observed by the auditor. Criteria used to assess performance. This provides the standard against which the observation is compared. Cause of the variance between the observation and the criteria. This provides the reason why performance is not in line with the standard.
44
(contd)
2. 3.
4.
Nature of the observation (also referred to as the condition or finding). This states the actual situation as observed by the auditor. Criteria used to assess performance. This provides the standard against which the observation is compared. Cause of the variance between the observation and the criteria. This provides the reason why performance is not in line with the standard. Effect of the variance. This sets out the continued risk to the organizations achievement of its objectives if the weakness is not addressed.
45
15
(contd)
4.
5.
Nature of the observation (condition or finding). This states the actual situation as observed by the auditor. Criteria used to assess performance. This provides the standard against which the observation is compared. Cause of the variance between the observation and the criteria. This provides the reason why performance is not in line with the standard. Effect of the variance. This sets out the continued risk to the organizations achievement of its objectives if the weakness is not addressed. Recommendations provided by the auditor as to how to address the cause and mitigate the risk in the future.
46
47
48
16
available;
49
available;
4. the secondary effects of any corrective
action;
50
available;
4. the secondary effects of any corrective
17
The main reason why the report should be reviewed with management before its release is to ensure that it contains no errors or misrepresentations. Errors of fact in audit reports do a great deal of damage to the credibility of the auditor and the audit department.
52
Reviewing the report also provides an opportunity to determine if there are any differences of opinion with management concerning the significance of any of the findings so that an effort can be made to come to a mutual agreement before the report is issued.
53
It also creates goodwill because the auditee manager will be aware of the audit findings and be able to prepare a response before higher management has received the report.
54
18
accuracy
55
2.
accuracy relevance
56
2. 3.
57
19
2. 3. 4.
58
2. 3. 4. 5.
59
2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
60
20
2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
61
2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
62
2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.
accuracy relevance clarity conciseness timeliness neutrality of tone objectivity constructiveness persuasiveness
63
21
2.
64
65
22
Follow-up process
The chief audit executive should establish a follow-up process to monitor and ensure that:
management actions have been effectively implemented or senior management has accepted the risk of not taking action
67
Timing of follow-up
the significance of the observation or recommendation the effort and cost needed to implement the recommendation the impacts that might result should the corrective action fail the complexity of the corrective action
68
The auditor should review to determine if observations and recommendations are still relevant.
69
23
(contd)
The auditor should review to determine if observations and recommendations are still relevant. The auditor should inquire of management what action has been taken in response to the audit findings.
2.
70
(contd)
The auditor should review to determine if observations and recommendations are still relevant. The auditor should inquire of management what action has been taken in response to the audit findings. The auditor should decide whether follow-up is required and the appropriate timing (i.e., a special assignment or part of the next scheduled audit of the activity).
71
Timing of follow-up
to be continuous from the date of the recommendation (for very high risk matters) a separate engagement to monitor the implementation of recommendations, allowing appropriate time for the recommendations to be implemented and the benefits realized as part of the next regularly scheduled audit of the unit or activity
72
24
(contd)
4.
The auditor should review to determine if observations and recommendations are still relevant. The auditor should inquire of management what action has been taken in response to the audit findings. The auditor should decide whether follow-up is required and the appropriate timing (i.e., a special assignment or part of the next scheduled audit of the activity). If a follow-up audit is appropriate, the auditor should verify the extent of corrective action and the progress made in mitigating the risk or exposure.
73
(contd)
4.
5.
The auditor should review to determine if observations and recommendations are still relevant. The auditor should inquire of management what action has been taken in response to the audit findings. The auditor should decide whether follow-up is required and the appropriate timing (i.e., a special assignment or part of the next scheduled audit of the activity). If a follow-up audit is appropriate, the auditor should verify the extent of corrective action and the progress made in mitigating the risk or exposure. The results of the follow-up review should be reported to management.
74
and asked to prepare draft findings for the audit report. Some of the items listed would not be reported because they are not weaknesses or because they are either not controllable or the risk is not significant.
2. You should attempt to draft the findings for this
case study as drafting such findings is frequently required on the course examination.
75
25
76
interviewing skills in internal auditing, and describe the recommended approach to managing conflict during an audit. (Level 2)
77
78
26
79
included in an internal audit report, including the main factors the internal auditor considers in developing recommendations and explain why the report (including recommendations) should be reviewed with management before its release. (Level 1)
80
81
27
to monitor the implementation of their recommendations, and determine the steps in a monitoring program. (Level 1)
82
83
84
28
85
86
87
29