Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
The greatest enemy of truth is very often not the deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic. We enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought. John F. Kennedy
Historical Concepts
The CDJ as a dividing line is imaginary (Coolidge, 29) Canals should be filled to the CDJ (Skillen, 30) Canals should be slightly overfilled (Blayney, 27)
Classic Concept
Kuttler 55
Reality
Dummer 84; Ainamo & Le 68 Madsen et al 00; Meder et al 09
Shape of apical canal anatomy determined Generated micro-computerized 3-D images Analyzed maxillary molar palatal roots Selected images giving best view of apical canal Analyzed by trained and blinded evaluators Determined shape of apical canal anatomy Categorized into configuration groups
Results
Parallel 35% Single 18% Tapering (Classic) 15% Flaring 18% Delta 12%
Results
Teeth and apical tissues removed from cadavers Histologically prepared Longitudinal sections to include apical 1/3 of canal Determined were:
Apical Constriction
Frequently not present When present, shape and canal level variable
Cemento-Dentinal Junction
Location of apical foramen, apical constriction Anatomy of apical constriction Relationship of CDJ with apical constriction
Multiconstricted
Flared
Apical anatomy often altered because of apical pathosis and root resorption
In Summary:
Kuttlers concept diagram likely does not occur When present, the apical constriction is highly variable Frequently, there is no constriction There is no clinical technique to evaluate presence of constriction or shape of apical anatomy The apical constriction should not be used as a landmark for C&S or obturation
The apical few millimeters is variable in shape in cross-section Many apical canals are flattened (ribbon-shaped) May be multiple foramina Frequent deviation from apex
Gani & Visvisian JOE 1999 Wu et al OOOOE 2000 Soma et al IEJ 2008 Martos et al IEJ 2009
Lateral Canals
Frequency Can
Apical Delta
Apparently not Teeth with RCT extracted Roots prepared histologically LCs and ARs examined for tissue, obturating materials and bacteria Results: LCs and ARs not debrided and seldom contained obturating material
Ricucci, Siqueira. J Endod 36: 1, 2010
Intracanal Isthmi
Frequency Can
Apparently not Block sections of apical regions in root-filled teeth were examined in cadaver jaws All roots had lateral canals No lateral canals contained obturating material No relationship was detected between unfilled lateral canals and the status of inflammation at the periapex
Apical Patency
What is it? What is the technique based upon? What are the advantages? What are the disadvantages?
Lightspeed rotary with and without patency files Balanced force hand with and without patency
Results:
Post-treatment pain?
No effect
Updated recommendations for managing the care of patients receiving oral bisphosphonate therapy. JADA 2009 For endodontic procedures: Manipulation beyond the apex is not recommended
Success rate?
Not determined
Tissue damage?
Not determined,
however
does not accomplish the stated objectives damages periapical tissues does not improve outcomes
Clearing
Size
of Preparation
10
Yes
Tan & Messer. JOE 2002 Card et al. JOE 2002 Usman et al. JOE 2004 Baugh & Wallace. JOE 2005 Heish et al. IEJ 2007
Oval Canal
Necrotic Debris
Before
Round Canal
Apical Clearing
After
11
Apical Clearing Procedure Effectiveness of Apical Clearing: Histologic and Morphologic Evaluation
Parris J, Wilcox L, Walton R J Endod 20:219, 1994
Irrigant present in canal Files 3-4 sizes larger than MAF rotated at WL Canal irrigated Canal dried with paper points Largest file rotated at WL
12
Objectives
Compare effectiveness of step-back without apical clearing vs. stepback with apical clearing for:
13
Conclusions
Apical clearing resulted in better debridement Apical transportation was found in both groups; more in the apically cleared group
Studies generally favor removal NaOCl alternated with EDTA best Deep needle penetration Special irrigating devices? Apical third less predictable removal
Messer Uroz-Torres et al. J Endod, 2010 Violich, Chandler. Int Endod J, 2010
R Madsen
14
Poor obturation
15
Considerations
Prognosis Periapical
Prognosis
Extrusion
of Obturating Material
An irritant Related to decreased success
Nair R. Pathways of the Pulp, 2006 Torabinejad & Siggurdson. Endodontics: Principles and Practice 2009
16
Prognosis
Success rate of endodontic treatment of teeth with vital and nonvital pulps. A meta-analysis
No difference between vital and non-vital pulps Failure rate greater with a lesion present Success much lower with obturation overextension than with flush or underextension Conclusion: The root canal should be filled to within 2mm of the radiographic apex.
Considerations
Prognosis Periapical
Materials
17
18
Stepback Crown-down
Rotary
Barbizam et al JOE, 2002 Wu & Wesselink IEJ, 2001 Rdig et al IEJ, 2002
Peters et al J Endod, 2001 Imura et al J Endod, 2001 Ahlquist et al Int Endod J, 2001 Hartmann et al J Endod, 2007 Moore et al Int Endod J, 2009
Obturation
Length Technique
19
Extrusion of Debris
Compared NiTi rotary (Lightspeed & ProFile .04) and stainless steel hand (step-back & balanced force) Determined amount of debris extrusion All techniques produced apical debris Overall, NiTi rotary extruded the least
Considerations
Prognosis
Periapical
Canal preparation with either SS hand or NiTi rotary Determined pain levels and pain incidence No difference in the groups
Post-Obturation Symptoms
48% reported symptoms after obturation 10% or less significant symptoms Overfill (no lesion) more pain
Considerations
Prognosis
Periradicular
20
Systemic Considerations
Oral
Bacteremia
Inducing Bacteremia
Impact
Bacterial Extension
Pulp Necrosis Apical Foramen
Periradicular Contamination
21
Updated recommendations for managing the care of patients receiving oral bisphosphonate therapy. JADA 2009 For endodontic procedures: Manipulation beyond the apex is not recommended
In Conclusion
Conclusions (continued)
Lengths should be 1-3 mm short of the apex Aberrations are inconsistently debrided Debris in the apical canal preparation should be reduced before obturation Apical canal preparation should be at least #40 There is no superior instrumentation technique
Apical canal anatomy and histology are variable and indeterminable, clinically Instruments, materials and chemicals should be confined to the canal
22
Materials
Periapical inflammation
Short
Systemic disease
Finally
We
23
Good clinical decisions require scientific accuracy to avoid bias Clinical significance is the consideration of risk vs. benefit Important outcomes (success) of therapy are measured by a combination of evidence-based criteria, clinical judgment and common sense.
24