Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 1

University of California Statement on Seismic Safety Study

Since 2007, a team led by University of California researchers has studied the seismic safety of a specific
building construction type -- older (generally pre-1980) reinforced concrete buildings.

The university is committed to furthering public understanding of the seismic risk associated with this
building type and contributing in a constructive and scientifically rigorous manner to the body of
information available to policymakers addressing seismic risk. This research was undertaken for exactly
that purpose.

It is important to clear up any confusion regarding what this study is and is not. The study, which is
nearing completion, is an assessment of the seismic collapse potential of a type of building. It is not a
seismic assessment of specific buildings.

Evaluating the seismic risk of specific buildings would require inspection of each building, confirmation
of the construction methods and design, and consideration of updated information regarding seismic
reinforcement work or other efforts that may have taken place in recent years to improve seismic
performance. The methodology of the researchers’ work did not include these kinds of evaluations
because the research concerns the building type generally and not the safety of specific structures.

The research does rely upon survey data generally confirming that approximately 1,500 structures in Los
Angeles are thought to be of reinforced concrete construction and constructed between roughly 1920 and
1980. The building inventory was prepared for the purpose of quantifying the overall seismic risk
associated with this building type in the city of Los Angeles, but the structures in the survey have not
been analyzed to determine whether individual buildings pose any specific level of seismic risk.

Release of information regarding individual buildings that was compiled for a prescribed methodological
purpose without a clear description of the methodological parameters and the scientific context could
cause undue and unnecessary alarm. The University does not intend to release information in a manner
that it considers to be irresponsible or inconsistent with the scientific context.

The university has not received a written request from the City of Los Angeles for the inventory portion
of the research underlying the study, nor has the City of Los Angeles communicated specifically how it
might use the inventory given the inventory’s lack of specific evaluation of individual buildings. The
University is prepared to discuss use of the inventory for purposes other than the scientific purpose for
which it was created with the City of Los Angeles, but those discussions have not yet occurred in
anything other than an a very informal and preliminary manner.

Ultimately, the research team does plan to post confirmed and reliable publicly accessible data from the
study on a public website.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi