Human Rights Alert, NGO

Joseph Zernik, PhD PO Box 33407, Tel Aviv 6133501

" 6133501 - ,33407 "

123456xyz@gmail.com;

13-10-10 Ometz v Lahyani et al (6549/13) in the Supreme Court of the State of Israel sham Conditional Decree Since 2002, absent lawfully appointed Chief Clerk, no Conditional Decrees are issued by the Court, pursuant to the law of the State of Israel, and the Court conducts sham review of such petitions.
# 1. Caption and No 13-10-10 Ometz v Lahyani et al (6549/13) in the Supreme Court of the State of Israel sham Conditional Decree [English translation] 13-10-10 Ometz v Lahyani et al (6549/13) in the Supreme Court of the State of Israel sham Conditional Decree [Hebrew original] Page 2

2.

3.

Conditional Decree form, Regulations Court Procedures of the 4 High Court of Justice of the State of Israel, Conditional Decree form (Regulation 21, Form 4) [English translation] Conditional Decree form, Regulations Court Procedures of the 5 High Court of Justice of the State of Israel, Conditional Decree form (Regulation 21, Form 4) [Hebrew original]

4.

The sham decree is titled Decisions instead of Conditional Decree, fails to refer to the paper as a summons, and is signed by a judge, instead of being duly signed by the Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court. Since 2002 the Supreme Court, absent lawfully appointed Chief Clerk, the Supreme Court subverts the Conditional Decree process, key process for protection of rights in Israel. Absent issuance of the Conditional Decree, equivalent of a summons for a case of original jurisdiction, the Court acts with no jurisdiction at all. In numerous other cases, Conditional Decree petitions are subverted through the conduct of prolonged Preliminary Proceedings with no foundation in the law of the State of Israel.
LINKS: [1] 12-05-10 Human Right Alert, Appendix I to Submission; 15th UPR - State of Israel "Integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic record systems of the courts of the State of Israel" https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B8Aa2xQGbmk5cjNxd2szX05oMkU

1/5

In the Supreme Court in Jerusalem

HCJ 6549/13 Before: Petitioner: The Honorable A Shoham Ometz Citizens for Competent Administration, Social and Judicial Justice 2. Council of the City of Bay-Yam 3. Bat-Yam BeRosh Muram Party 4. Attorney General of the State of Israel Counsel: Petition for Conditional Decree Pursuant to Notice by Respondent 1, Respondent 2 is scheduled to convene on October 16, 2013, to discuss the removal of Respondent 1 from office. The Petition is scheduled for a hearing in a forum of three on October 20, 2013, at 9:00am, and updated notices by the Respondents 1-3 shall be filed by October 17, 2013, no later than 16:00. Given today, October 10, 2013 [unsigned] Judge _________ Version subject to edition and phrasing changes. 1506437.doc HG Information Center Tel: 077-1703333, Internet site: www.courts.gov.il

Respondent: 1. Mr Shlomo Lahyani, Mayor of the City of Bat-Yam

2/5

3/5

Regulations of Court Procedures of the High Court of Justice (1984) Form 4 (Regulation 21) Conditional Decree (Title same as in Form 1) Pursuant to Petition, brought before on __<date>____ before this Court, in the presence of the Petitioner of his Counsel, this Court orders that a Conditional Decree (or Summons) be entered addressed to _______ requiring him to appear and provide explanation, why (as stated in the Petition). The Respondent shall file and serve his Response, if he so wishes, within ___ days from the service of instant Decree, to the Court and to the Petitioner. The Petition shall be heard in this Court on ____. Given today, ___________ Signature of Magistrate or Chief Clerk Supreme Court

4/5

5/5