Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 70

PEMP

AME2503
Structural Probloem
Truss Element
Session delivered by: Session delivered by:
Dr Vinod K Banthia Dr Vinod K Banthia Dr. Vinod K. Banthia Dr. Vinod K. Banthia
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 1
PEMP
AME2503
Session Objectives
At the end of this session the delegate would have understood
the the
Breaking up and Putting together of structures
The meaning of Element Formulation
Approaches to Element Formulation
Concept of shape functions for element formulation
Energyapproachfor element formulation Energy approach for element formulation
Concept of natural coordinate systems and J acobian
Limitation of linear elements
Development of higher order elements
Impact of distortion in the element on its performance
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 2
PEMP
AME2503
Session Topics
1. Structure as a combination of springs
2. Structure idealisation, discretisation and assembly
3 El t tiff f l ti 3. Element stiffness formulation
4. Displacement approach and shape functions
5. Concept, propertiesanduseof shapefunctions 5. Concept, properties and use of shape functions
6. Natural coordinates and mapping
7. Use of energy methods for element formulation
8. Pr. of Virtual work, Variation approach and Pr. of minimum
potential energy
9. Element stiffnessandconsistent loads 9. Element stiffness and consistent loads
10. Limitation of linear elements
11. Higher order element definition and formulation
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 3
12. Element distortion and resulting impact
PEMP
AME2503
Putting together of the structure
PP
o
To determine the Deformation (o) in a structure of stiffness (K) subjected to Load (P)
Ko = P
o
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 4
P
o
P
o
PEMP
AME2503
o = o
1
+ o
2
o
1
o
2
= (F
1
/K
1
) + (F
1
/K
2
)
o
1
2
F
1
= P
(Equilibrium) K1*o
1
= F
1
K2*o
2
= F
1
o =(F /K ) +(F /K )
P
o
o = (F
1
/K
1
) + (F
1
/K
2
)
= P[(1/K
1
) + (1/K
2
)]
(K
1
*K2)
(K +K )
o = P
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 5
(K
1
+K
2
)
PEMP
AME2503
o
1
o
2
P = F
1
+ F
2
= (K
1
*o1) + (K
2
*o
2
)
o
1
2
(
1
) (
2 2
)
(Equilibrium)
o
1
= o
2
(Continuity)
P
o
P = (K
1
*o) + (K
2
*o)
(K
1
+K
2
)* o = P
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 6
PEMP
AME2503
Typical Problem in Solid Mechanics
P
1
K
1
o
1
K
2
o
2
1
o
3
K
K
o
2
P
3
K
3
K
4
Basic
P
o
P
o
Configurations
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 7
P
o
PEMP
AME2503
1 2
P
A
1
,L
1
,E
1
A
2
,L
2
,E
2
1
Pl
o
2 1
Pl Pl
+ o
1 1
1
1
E A
= o
2 2
2
1 1
1
2
E A E A
+ = o
E A E A
1
1 1
1
l
E A
K =
2
2 2
2
l
E A
K =
o
2 2 1 1 2 1
* E A E A K K
P
o
1 2 2 2 1 1
2 2 1 1
2 1
2 1
l E A l E A
E A E A
K K
K K
K
+
=
+
=
2 2
2
1 1
1
2 2 1 1
1 2 2 2 1 1
2
) (
E A
Pl
E A
Pl
E A E A
l E A l E A P
K
P
+ =
+
= = o
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 8
?
1
= o
PEMP
AME2503
U1, P1 U2, P2 U3, P3
K3
K5
M1 M2 M3
K6
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 9
PEMP
AME2503
U1
F
1
(1)
K
1
U
1
=F
1
(1)
U2 U1 U2 U1
F
2
(2)
F
1
(2)
F
1
(2)
F
2
(2)
K
2
1 1 U
1
-1 1 U
2
=
K
2
(+U
1
- U
2
) = F
1
(2)
K
2
(-U
1
+U
2
) = F
2
(2)
2
F
1
2
1 1 U
2
2
(
1 2
)
2
U2 U1
F
(3)
F
(3)
F
1
(3)
F
(3)
K
3
1 1 U
1
1 1 U
=
K
3
(+U
1
- U
2
) = F
1
(3)
K ( U +U ) F
(3)
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 10
F
2
(3)
F
1
(3)
F
2
(3)
-1 1 U
2
K
3
(-U
1
+U
2
) = F
2
(3)
PEMP
AME2503
U3 U2
F
2
(4)
1 1 U
2
K (+U U ) F
(4)
F
3
(4)
F
2
(4)
2
F
3
(4)
K
4
1 1 U
2
-1 1 U
3
=
K
4
(+U
2
U
3
) = F
2
(4)
K
4
(-U
2
+U
3
) = F
3
(4)
U3 U2
F
3
(5)
F
2
(5)
F
2
(5)
F
3
(5)
K
5
1 1 U
2
-1 1 U
3
=
K
5
(+U
2
U
3
) = F
2
(5)
K
5
(-U
2
+U
3
) = F
3
(5)
U3 U2 U3 U2
F
3
(6)
F
2
(6)
F
2
(6)
F
3
(6)
K
6
1 1 U
2
1 1 U
=
K
6
(+U
2
U
3
) = F
2
(6)
K
6
(-U
2
+U
3
) = F
3
(6)
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 11
F
3
F
2
F
3
-1 1 U
3
6
(
2 3
)
3
PEMP
AME2503
U1, P1 U2, P2 U3, P3
K5
M1 M2 M3
K6
K3
K5
M1 M2 M3
( ) ( ) ( )
Equilibrium Equations:
Station 1: F
1
(1)
+ F
1
(2)
+ F
1
(3)
=P
1
Station 2: F
2
(2)
+ F
2
(3)
+ F
2
(4)
+ F
2
(5)
+ F
2
(6)
= P
2
KU = P
Station 3: F
3
(4)
+ F
3
(5)
+ F
3
(6)
=P
3
U ={U1 U2 U3} DisplacementVector
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 12
U {U1 U2 U3} Displacement Vector
P = {P1 P2 P3} Load Vector
PEMP
AME2503
U1 P1 U2 P2 U3 P3
St 1: F
1
(1)
+ F
1
(2)
+ F
1
(3)
=P
1
St 2: F
2
(2)
+ F
2
(3)
+ F
2
(4)
+ F
2
(5)
+ F
2
(6)
= P
2
K5
U1, P1 U2, P2 U3, P3
M1 M2 M3
St 3: F
3
(4)
+ F
3
(5)
+ F
3
(6)
=P
3
K6
K3
M1 M2 M3
1 2 1 3 2 1 2 1 1
) ( ) ( P U U K U U K U K = + +
) 0 ( ) ( ) ( P U U K K U K K K
1 3 2 3 2 1 3 2 1
) 0 ( ) ( ) ( P U U K K U K K K = + + + +
) ( ) ( 1 ) 3 2 ( P U K K K U K K K K K U K K = + + + + + + + +
2 3 6 5 4 2 6 5 4 3 2
) ( ) ( 1 ) 3 2 ( P U K K K U K K K K K U K K = + + + + + + + +
3 3 6 5 4 2 6 5 4 1
) ( ) ( ) 0 ( P U K K K U K K K U = + + + + +
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 13
3 3 6 5 4 2 6 5 4 1
) ( ) ( ) (
PEMP
AME2503
K
1
+K
2
+K
3
-K
2
-K
3
0
K=
-K
2
-K
3
K
2
+K
3
+K
4
+K
5
+K
6
-K
4
-K
5
-K
6
5 6
K
4
+K
5
+K
6
0 -K
4
-K
5
-K
6
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 14
PEMP
AME2503
U1, P1 U2, P2 U3, P3
M1 M2 M3
0 0 0
U1 U2 U3
P1
K=
0 0 0
P2
0 0 0
P3
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 15
PEMP
AME2503
U1, P1 U2, P2 U3, P3
M1 M2 M3
F1
(1)
+F1
(2)
+F1
(3)
=P1
K
0 0
U1 U2 U3
P1
K
1
0 0 0
P1
P2
K
1
U
1
=F
1
(1)
0
0
0
0
0
0
P2
P3
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 16
0 0 0
P3
PEMP
AME2503
U1, P1 U2, P2 U3, P3
F1
(1)
+F1
(2)
+F1
(3)
=P1
M1 M2 M3
F2
(2)
+F2
(3)
+F2
(4)
+F2
(5)
+F2
(6)
=P2
K
1
+K
2 -K
2
0
U1 U2 U3
P1
1 2
-K
2
K
2
K
2
0
P2
K
2
(+U
1
- U
2
) = F
1
(2)
K ( U +U ) = F
(2)
0
K
2
0
K
2
0
0
P3
K
2
(-U
1
+U
2
) = F
2
( )
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 17
PEMP
AME2503
U1, P1 U2, P2 U3, P3
F1
(1)
+F1
(2)
+F1
(3)
=P1
K3
M1 M2 M3
F2
(2)
+F2
(3)
+F2
(4)
+F2
(5)
+F2
(6)
=P2
K +K +K K K 0
U1 U2 U3
P1
K
1
+K
2
+K
3
-K
2
-K
3
K K
K
2
+K
3
0
0
P2
K
3
(+U
1
- U
2
) = F
1
(3)
K (-U +U ) = F
(3)
-K
2
-K
3
0 0
0
0
P3
K
3
(-U
1
+U
2
) = F
2
( )
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 18
PEMP
AME2503
U1, P1 U2, P2 U3, P3
K3
M1 M2 M3
F2
(2)
+F2
(3)
+F2
(4)
+F2
(5)
+F2
(6)
=P2
F3
(4)
+F3
(5)
+F3
(6)
=P3
K +K +K K K 0
U1 U2 U3
P1
K
1
+K
2
+K
3
-K
2
-K
3
K K K +K +K
0
K
P2
K
4
(+U
2
U
3
) = F
2
(4)
K ( U +U ) = F
(4)
-K
2
-K
3
K
2
+K
3
+K
4
K
4
0
-K
4
-K
4
P3
K
4
(-U
2
+U
3
) = F
3
( )
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 19
4 4
PEMP
AME2503
U1, P1 U2, P2 U3, P3
K3
K5
M1 M2 M3
F2
(2)
+F2
(3)
+F2
(4)
+F2
(5)
+F2
(6)
=P2
F3
(4)
+F3
(5)
+F3
(6)
=P3
K +K +K K K 0
U1 U2 U3
P1
K
1
+K
2
+K
3
-K
2
-K
3
K K
K
2
+K
3
+K
4
0
K K
P2
K
5
(+U
2
U
3
) = F
2
(5)
K ( U +U ) = F
(5)
-K
2
-K
3
+K
5
K
4
+K
5
0
-K
4
-K
5
-K
4
-K
5
P3
K
5
(-U
2
+U
3
) = F
3
( )
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 20
4 5 4 5
PEMP
AME2503
U1, P1 U2, P2 U3, P3
K
K3
K5
M1 M2 M3
F2
(2)
+F2
(3)
+F2
(4)
+F2
(5)
+F2
(6)
=P2
F3
(4)
+F3
(5)
+F3
(6)
=P3
K6
K +K +K K K 0
U1 U2 U3
P1
K
1
+K
2
+K
3
-K
2
-K
3
K K
K
2
+K
3
+K
4
0
K K K
P2
K
6
(+U
2
U
3
) = F
2
(6)
K ( U +U ) = F
(6)
-K
2
-K
3
+K
5
+K
6
K
4
+K
5
+K
6
0
-K
4
-K
5
-K
6
-K
4
-K
5
-K
6
P3
K
6
(-U
2
+U
3
) = F
3
( )
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 21
4 5 6 4 5 6
PEMP
AME2503
1 1
E A
K
2 2
E A
K
P F F F = = +
) 2 ( ) 2 ( ) 1 (
; 0
Equilibrium at point 1 and 2
o o
1
1 1
1
l
E A
K =
2
2 2
2
l
E A
K =
P F F F = = +
2 1 1
; 0
0 ) (
2 2 1 2 1
= + o o K K K
P K K o o
K
1
o
1
K
2
P
o
2
`

=
`

(
(

+ K K K 0
1 2 2 1
o
P K K = +
2 2 1 2
o o
o
1
K
1
o
1
=F
1
(1)
1 2
)
`

)
`

P K K
2 2 2
o
(
K K 0
1
o
(DE to Simultaneous eq. 2x2)
F
1
(1)
K
1
o
1
F
1
o o
)
`

+
=
)
`

P K K K
K K
K K
0
1
2 1 2
2 2
2 1 2
1
o
o
1 Pl
o
2
o
1
F
2
(2)
F
1
(2)
K
2
(+o
1
- o
2
) = F
1
(2)
K
2
(-o
1
+o
2
) = F
2
(2)
1 1
1
1
1
1
E A
Pl
P
K
= = o
2 1 2 1
2
Pl Pl
P
K K
+ =
+
= o
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 22
2
F
1
2 2 1 1 2 1
2
E A E A
P
K K
+ o
PEMP
AME2503
Idealisation and Discretisation
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 23
PEMP
AME2503
The Behaviour
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 24
PEMP
AME2503
Idealisation and Discretisation
(KYS) (KYS)
Idealisation
P
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 25
Behaviour can be represented using mathematical equations
P
PEMP
AME2503
FEM Idealisation FEM Idealisation
Idealisation
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 26
PEMP
AME2503
FEM Discretisation FEM Discretisation
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 27
PEMP
AME2503
FEM Assembly & Solution FEM Assembly & Solution
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 28
PEMP
AME2503
El t F l ti Element Formulation
Session delivered by: Session delivered by:
Dr Vinod K Banthia Dr Vinod K Banthia Dr. Vinod K. Banthia Dr. Vinod K. Banthia
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 29
PEMP
AME2503
Typical Problem in Solid Mechanics
PP
o
To determine the Deformation (o) in a structure of stiffness (K) subjected to Load (P)
Ko = P
K=?
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 30
PEMP
AME2503
1-D Truss Element (Formulation)
o
I
o
J
A, L, E F
I
F
J
I
J
K
e
* o
e
= F
e
2 x 2 2 x 1 2 x 1
`

(
(

I I IJ II
F K K o
*
)
`

=
)
`

J
I
J
I
JJ JI
IJ II
F K K o
*
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 31
PEMP
AME2503
1-D Truss Element (Direct Method Formulation)
o
1
o
2
o
A, L, E F
1
F
2
1
2
F
2
= Ao
c
2
o = Ec
c = (o
2
-o
1
)/L
L AE AE F F / ) (
2 1 2 1
o o c = = =
(
+ 1 1 F
AE
o
L AE AE F / ) (
1 2 2
o o c = =
)
`

=
)
`

+
+
2
1
2
1
*
1 1
1 1
F
F
L
AE
o
o
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 32
PEMP
AME2503
1-D Truss Element (Strain & Stress)
o
1
o
2
o
A, L, E F
1
F
2
1 2
c

=
A
=
1 2
o o
c
L


= =
1
o
c
L L


=
1
o
c o
E
E

)
`

=
2
1
1 1
1
o
o
L

)
`

=
2
1
1 1
o
o
L
E

Sign Convention:
Positive Stress or Strain Tensile
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 33
Negative Stress or Strain Compressive
PEMP
AME2503
1-D Truss Element (Summary)
Geometric - Area of Cross-section (A)
L th(L)
Required Inputs:
Length (L)
Material - Modulus of elasticity (E)
Si C i f S & S i Sign Convention for Stress & Strain:
Positive - Elongation/Tensile Strain/Stress
Negative Compression/CompressiveStrain/Stress Negative - Compression/Compressive Strain/Stress
Observations:
A
1 2
o o L
The normal Strain/Stress does not vary
`

=
= =
1
1 2
1 1
1
o
c
L L
The normal Strain/Stress does not vary
throughout the element i.e., it is constant.
The Strain/Stress throughout the mesh
varies in a piecewise constant manner
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 34

)
`

=
2
1 1
o L

varies in a piecewise constant manner.
PEMP
AME2503
1-D Truss Element (Summary)
Applicability:
Solid Mechanics
H tT f Heat Transfer
Flow
Dimensionality: Dimensionality:
1-D
Element Shape: Element Shape:
Line
Material Law: ate a aw:
Hookes Law (Linear Elastic)
Nodal Degrees of Freedom:
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 35
g
Translation along x direction
PEMP
AME2503
1-D Truss Element (Summary)
Assumptions: Assumptions:
Prismatic Member (Uniform Cross-section)
Loads/Weight act only along the axis of the element
Loads applied at the centroid of the cross-section
Applied Loads are constant
Material is homogeneous and isotropic
Poissons effect is neglected
Buckling effect is not considered
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 36
Cross-section remains plane
PEMP
AME2503
Local and Global Coordinate Systems
o
1
o
2
A, L, E F
1
F
2
1 2
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 37
PEMP
AME2503
1-D Truss Element (Displacement Approach)
o
1
o
2
A, L, E F
1
F
2
1 2
AssumeaDisplacement Function Assume a Displacement Function

+ =
2 1
a
x a a u

)
`

=
2
1
x 1
a
a
1 1 2 1
0 * ) 0 ( o = = + = a a a u
l l l) ( o
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 38
l a l a a l u
I 2 2 1
) ( + = + = o
PEMP
AME2503
1-D Truss Element (Displacement Approach)
Y
x 2
o
y
Y
a
2
2
x
L
x 1
o
1
u
2
L
a
1
u
1
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 39
X
PEMP
AME2503
1-D Truss Element (Displacement Approach)
1
1 2
o
o o
+
|
.
|

\
|

= x
L
u
. \
L
`

=
1
1
o
o
x x
)
`

2
o L L
`

1
1
o
du

)
`

= =
2
1
1 1
1
o
o
c
L dx
du


)
`

= =
2
1
1 1
o
o
c o
L
E
E
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 40
) 2
PEMP
AME2503
1-D Truss Element (Displacement Approach)

)
`

=
)
`

=
2
1
2
1
1 1
1
o
o
o
o
c B
L
) ) 2 2
o o L
Strain-Displacement Matrix

)
`

=
1
2 1
o
o
c B B

)
`

2
2 1
o
(
1 1 1
0 o c c
DB D
E
)
`

=
)
`

=
)
`

=
2
1
2
1
2
1
0
0
o
o
c
c
c
c
o DB D
E
E
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 41
Stress-Strain Matrix
PEMP
AME2503
1-D Truss Element Representation of Displacement Variation
o
2
o
1
2
L
1
o
25
Variation of Delta = Variation of Delta1 + Variation of Delta2
Variation of Delta1 = o
1
*f(x), where f(x) =1@x=0 and
=0@x=1
15
20
25
Variation of delta
delta1
delta2
@
5
10
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 42
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
PEMP
AME2503
1-D Truss Element (Shape Functions)
Shape Functions:
L
x
N =1
1
2 Node at 0 1 Node at 1 = =
L
1
L
x
N =
2
2 Node at 1 1 Node at 0 = =
N
1
1
1
2 1
= + N N
L
2 Node at 1 1 Node at 0
N
1
N
2
1 2
L
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 43
L
PEMP
AME2503
1-D Truss Element (Shape Function Approach)
o
1
o
2
A, L, E F
1
F
2
1 2

(

o o

)
`

=
)
`

=
2
1
2
1
2 1
1
o
o
o
o
L
x
L
x
N N u

| |
)
`

=
)
`

= =
1 1
1 1
1
o
o
o
o
c B
L dx
du
) ) 2 2
o o L dx
| | | || |
`

=
`

=
`

(
(

=
1 1 1
0 o c c
o B D D
E
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 44
| | | || |
)
`

)
`

)
`

2 2 2
0 o c c
o B D D
E
PEMP
AME2503
Generation of Shape Functions
PascalsTriangle
......
2
6 5
2
4 3 2 1
+ + + + + + = y xy x y x o o o o o o |
1
Pascal s Triangle
1
y x
x
2
y
2 xy
y
x
3
y
3
x
2
y xy
2
Lagrange Polynomial
) .( )......... )( .( )......... )( (
1 1 1 0 k k
n
x x x x x x x x x x
l

) .( )......... )( .( )......... )( (
) .( )......... )( .( )......... )( (
1 1 1 0
1 1 1 0
n k k k k k k k
n k k
n
k
x x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x x
l

=
+
+
m n
l l N N =
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 45
J I IJ i
l l N N =
PEMP
AME2503
1-D Truss Element (Natural Coordinate System)
Mapping of physical coordinates into non-dimensionalised system
N l C d k l f 1 d 0 h d Natural Coordinates take values of 1 and 0 at the nodes
L
L L /
1 1
=
O
1
2
P
L
/
1 1

1

1
= L
1
/ L
2
x
1
L
2
L
1
+
L L /
2 2
=
x
2
= x
1
+ L
x =
1
x
1
+
2
x
2
2 2

2
= L
2
/ L
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 46
1
2 1
= +
PEMP
AME2503
1-D Truss Element (Natural Coordinate System)
1
2
L/2 L/2

X
1
X
2
= -1 = 1 = 0
+b = a+bx
1 =a+bX 1 =a+bX 1 = a+bX
1
1 = a+bX
2
1 ) (
2
1
= X X
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 47
1 ) (
) (
1
1 2

X X
X X

PEMP
AME2503
1-D Truss Element (Natural Coordinate System)
) 1 (
N
Shape Functions in Natural Coordinate System
) 1 ( +
N
2
) (
1

= N
2
) (
2

= N
o o N N u + =
Strains in Natural Coordinate System
2 2 1 1
o o N N u + =
L d
du
dx
d
d
du
dx
du 2
*

c = = =

| |
)
`

=
)
`

=
)
`

=
1 1 1
2 1
1 1
1 2
o
o
o
o
o
o

B
L d
dN
d
dN
L
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 48
) ) ) 2 2 2
o o o L d d L
PEMP
AME2503
Generation of Shape Functions
S di i f il Serendipity family
=1 =+1
2
) 1 (
1

= N
2
) 1 (
2
+
= N
q
= 1 =+1
) 1 )( 1 (
q
(1,1)
(-1,1)
4
) 1 )( 1 (
i i
i
N
qq + +
=
) 1 )( 1 )( 1 (

(0,0)
4
) 1 )( 1 )( 1 ( + + +
=
i i i i
i
N
qq qq
) 1 )( 1 (
2
+ qq

(-1,-1) (1,-1)
0
2
) 1 )( 1 (
=
+
=
i
i
i
for N
qq
0
) 1 )( 1 (
2
=
+
=
i
for N q
q
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 49
0
2
= =
i i
for N q
PEMP
AME2503
Element Formulation Potential Energy Approach
P i i l f Vi l W k Principle of Virtual Work:
Real Quantities:
P
1
P
2
Forces & Moments (P,T,&F)
Virtual Quantity:
F
B
o
Virtual Quantity:
Displacement (o)
T
i
Virt al Strain(oc)
P
i
Virtual Strain (oc)
Virtual Work Internal & External
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 50
(oU) (oV)
PEMP
AME2503
Element Formulation Energy Approach
For a body in static equilibrium, the sum of the work done by the
Principle of Virtual Work:
y q f y
external loads (oV) and the stored strain energy (oU) is equal to
zero for any kinematically admissible virtual displacement field (o
i
)
oU + oV = 0
}}}
=
V
dV U o oc o ) (
}} }}}

}} }}}
+ + =
n
i i B
P dS dV F V
1
S
i S
V
* T * * o o o o
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 51
PEMP
AME2503
Element Formulation Energy Approach
Principle of Minimum Potential Energy:
For conservative systems, of all the kinematically admissible
displacement fields, those corresponding to equilibrium extremise
the total Potential Energy. If the extremum condition is a minimum,
the equilibrium is stable the equilibrium is stable
Kinematically admissible displacements are those that satisfy the
single-valued nature of displacements (compatibility) and boundary g f p ( p y) y
conditions.
m) Equilibriu (Stable 0
2
2
>
H
d
d
H
) q (
2
du
) E ilib i (U t bl 0
2
H d
m) Equilibriu (Neutral 0
2
2
=
H
du
d
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 52
m) Equilibriu (Unstable 0
2
<
du
u
PEMP
AME2503
Solution Techniques for Boundary Value Problems
Principle of Minimum Potential Energy:
P
x=0 x=l
Z
z
B
X Y
dA
For Beam
( ) l / x sin B ) x ( w t =
For Beam
( ) ( ) l / x cos l / Bz ) x ( w z ) z ( u t t =
'
=
( ) ( ) l / x sin l / Bz ) x ( w z ) z ( t t c
2
=
' '
=
) z ( E ) z ( c o =
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 53
) z ( E ) z ( c o =
PEMP
AME2503
Principleof MinimumPotential Energy:
Solution Techniques for Boundary Value Problems
}} }} }}
' '
= = = dV w Ez dV E dV B U
2
1
2
1
2
1
) (
2 2 2
c oc
Principle of Minimum Potential Energy:
( )
( )
( )
( )
} } }
= = dx l x
l EI B
dA z dx l x
l E B
/ sin
2
/
/ sin
2
/
2 2 2
2
4
2
2 2
4
2
t
t
t
t
( ) l l EI B
(
/
4
2
t
PB B V = ) (
( )
PB
l l EI B
B V B U B PE
(

= =
2 2
/
) ( ) ( ) (
t
F t ti ilib i B h ldb hth t
0
)) ( ( B PE d
For static equilibrium, B should be such that
0
)) ( (
=
dB
S l i it hi ll t
1
020532 0 B
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 54
Solving it graphically, we get
7 . 48
020532 . 0 ~ B
(See Excel worksheet in the next slide)
PEMP
AME2503
Potential Energy of a centrally loaded simply supported beamas a Potential Energy of a centrally loaded simply supported beam as a
function of the maximum deflection
0.02
0.01
0
P
E
(
B
)
)
/
d
B
-0.01
d
(
P
-0.02
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 55
B
PEMP
AME2503
( )

Element Formulation Energy Approach


Element Formulation:
( )

+ = +
e
e e
V U V U
Element Formulation:

= ~
i i
a N * u

u
St i E
| |a B = c | | | || |a D B D = = c o
Strain Energy:
| | ( ) | || |
e
T
e e
T
e
adV B D a B dV U
}}} }}}
= =
2
1
2
1
o c | | ( ) | || |
e
V
e
V
e e
e e
}}} }}}
2 2
| | | || |
e e
T
T
e e
dV a B D B a U
}}}
=
2
1
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 56
V
e
}}}
2
PEMP
AME2503
Element Formulation Energy Approach
Work Potential:
Element Formulation:

}} }}}
+ + =
n
i i B
u P dS u dV F u V
i S
* T * *

}} }}}
+ +
i i e e B e
u P dS u dV F u V
1
S
i S
V
T
e e
| | ( ) | | ( ) | | ( )
i
n
T
e e
T
e e B
T
e e
P a N dS a N dV F a N V

}} }}}
+ + =
1
S
i
V
T
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 57
S V
e e
PEMP
AME2503
Element Formulation Energy Approach
Element Formulation:
| | | || |
T
e
dV a B D B
U
}}}
=
c
| | | || |
e e
V
e
dV a B D B
a
e
}}}
=
c
V c
| | | |
i
n
e
T
e B
T
e
e
P N dS N dV F N
a
V
T

}} }}}
+ + =
c
c
1
S
i
V
T
e e
( )
e e
V U + c
H c

For extremum
( )
i
e
e e
i
a a c
= =
c
H c

0
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 58
R Ka =
PEMP
AME2503
Element Formulation Energy Approach
Element Formulation:
| | | || |

}}}
T
dV B D B K | | | || |

}}}
=
e
e
V
dV B D B K
e
(Assembly)
P T B
R R R R + + =
| |

}}}
=
e
V

e
e B
T
B
dV F N R
e

}}
=
e
e
T
T
dS N R
e
S
i
T
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 59
i L
P R =
PEMP
AME2503
Element Formulation Energy Approach
Formulation of 1D Truss Element:
o o
A, L, E F
1
F
2
1 2
o
1
o
2
A, L, E F
1
F
2
1 2
i i i
L
x
L
x
N o o

(

= = 1 * u
i i i
L L

(

| |

1 1
1
=
L
B
L
| |
(
(

=
0 1
E D
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 60
| |
(

1 0
E D
PEMP
AME2503
Element Formulation Energy Approach
Formulation of 1D Truss Element:
| | | || |

(
(

} }
1 1
1
1
1
Adx E dV B D B K
L
T
| | | || |

(

= =
} }
1 1
1 1
1
0
AE
Adx
L
E
L
dV B D B K
e
V
e
e
(

=
1 1
1 1
L
AE
| |
)
`


= =
} }}}
1
1
2
1
0
B
B
L
e B
T
e
B
ALF
dx AF
x
L
x
dV F N R | |
)
`

)
`

} }}}
1 2
0
V
e
B e B
e
B
L
x
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 61
PEMP
AME2503
1-D Truss Element (Characteristics)
A L E F
1
F
2 1 2
o
1
o
2
Axial Displacement Linear
A, L, E F
1
F
2 1 2
F
1
F
2
Deformation Constant
1 2
A, L, E
o
1
o
2
1 2
A, L, E
F
1
F
2
o
1
o
2
c
1
c
2
Strain Constant
F
1
F
2
o o
o
1
o
2
Stress Constant
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 62
1 2
A, L, E
o
1
o
2
PEMP
AME2503
A l R l FEA i i
1-D Truss Element (Characteristics)
Actual Result FE Approximation
r
a
i
n
r
a
i
n
S
t
r
e
s
s
/
S
t
r
t
r
e
s
s
/
S
t
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
/
S
m
a
t
i
o
n
/
S
Error
D
e
f
o
r
m
X
D
e
f
o
r
m
X
o
For a given element size, higher the result gradients higher is the error
For a given result gradient, smaller the element size smaller is the error
For better accuracy usesmaller elements
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 63
For better accuracy, use smaller elements
Smaller elements require more computing resources
PEMP
AME2503
A l R l
1-D Truss Element (Alternative)
/
S
t
r
a
i
n
/
S
t
r
a
i
n
Actual Result
FE Approximation1
FE Approximation2
n
/
S
t
r
e
s
s
/
n
/
S
t
r
e
s
s
/
Linear variation over the element
of Deformation/Stress/Strain
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
nof Deformation/Stress/Strain
Q adratic ariationo er the
D
e
f
o
X
D
e
f
o
X
Quadratic variation over the
element of Axial Displacement
x a a u
2 1
+ =
+
2
3 2 1
x a x a a u + + =
2
+ +
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 64
x a a u
2 1
+ =
2
3 2 1
x a x a a u + + =
PEMP
AME2503
L/2 L/2
1-D Quadratic Truss Element (Formulation)

3 3 2 2 1 1
o o o N N N u + + =
) ( 2 x x
L/2 L/2
1
x
2
x
3
x
1 2

1 1 0
3
) (
) ( 2
1 2
3
x x
x x

=
= -1 = 1 = 0
) 1 (
2
1
) 1 (
2
1
) 1 (
2
1
2
1
= = N
1
1.2
N3
N2
N1
2 2 2
) 1 (
1
) 1 (
1
) 1 (
1
2
+ = + = N
0.6
0.8
) 1 (
2
) 1 (
2
) 1 (
2
2
+ = + = N
) 1 )( 1 ( ) 1 (
2
+ N
0.2
0.4
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 65
) 1 )( 1 ( ) 1 (
2
3
+ = = N
-0.2
0
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
PEMP
AME2503
1-D Quadratic Truss Element (Formulation)
3 3 2 2 1 1
x N x N x N x + + =
L
For mid-point node element
) ( 2 ) ( 2
2
1 3 1 2
L
x x L x x + = + =
L
x x
x x
x x ) ( 2
) (
) ( 2
3
1 2
3

=

=
L
3
2
x
L
x + =

L
d
L
dx
2
=
L
J
dx
= =
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 66
2
J
d
= =

PEMP
AME2503
1-D Quadratic Truss Element (Formulation)

c
d
du
L d
du
J
dx
d
d
du
dx
du 2
1
= = = =

(
(

=
2
1
3 2 1
2
o
o
dN dN dN

)
`

3
2
o
o
d d d L

o


+
=
2
1
2
2
2 1
2
2 1 2
o
o
o


L

o

)

3
o
| |

=
2
1
o
o
B
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 67

3
o
PEMP
AME2503
1-D Quadratic Truss Element (Formulation)
| | | | | | | | | | | | d
L
B B
L
AE
dx B B
L
AE
dV B E B K
T
T T
e
2
4 4
1
2 2 } } }
= = = | | | | | | | | | | | |
L L
L V
e
e
2
1
2 2 } } }

(
(


8 7 1
8 1 7
AE
K
(
(
(


=
16 8 8
8 7 1
3L
AE
K
e

| |

} }
6 1
2 1
2
2 1
1
T
L

| |

+
= =
} }

3 2
6 1
2
2
2
2 1
1
B B e B
T
V
e
B
ALF d
L
AF dV F N R
e

M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 68

PEMP
AME2503
Quarter Point Truss Element
1 2

3
L/4 3L/4
0
1
= x
2
x
3
x
1 2
= -1 = 1 = 0
3
3 3 2 2 1 1
x N x N x N x + + =
3 3 2 2 1 1
L
x L x = =
For quarter-point node element
( )
2
1 + =
L
x
1 2 =
x

4
3 2
x L x = = ( ) 1
4
+ = x
(
(

+ = = L
L dx
J

1 2 =
L

J
1
1
=

+ = = L
d
J
2 2 xL
J =
A 0
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 69
o , x As 0
PEMP
AME2503
Summary
I l i f FE hh b l i d Implementation of FE approach has been explained
Variables of consequence have been identified
Meaning and goal of element formulation has been explained g g p
Formulation of 1-D truss element using displacement approach has
been explained
Concept of shapefunction itspropertiesanduseinelement Concept of shape function, its properties and use in element
formulation has been explained
Natural coordinates and their use in element formulation has been
l i d explained.
Use of energy methods in element formulation has been explained.
Limitation of linear elements and need for higher order elements has g
been demonstrated
Formulation of quadratic 1-D element has been demonstrated
Effect of element distortionhasbeendemonstratedusingacracktip
M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru 70
Effect of element distortion has been demonstrated using a crack tip
element

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi