Attribute Gage R & R Effectiveness

Instructions:
1) The following spreadsheet is used to calculate an Attribute GR&R Effectiveness, in which up to 100 samples
can be evaluated, using 2 or 3 operators.

2) In the Data Entry worksheet, fill in the appropriate information in the Scoring Report section and enter the type
of Attributes you are evaluating in the Attribute Legend section. THE INFORMATION MUST BE ENTERED INTO THE ATTRIBUTE LEGEND SECTION OR THE SPREADSHEET WILL NOT WORK. The attributes can be either alpha or numeric, e.g. Yes, No; pass, fail; go, stop; or 1, 2. You must be consistent throughout the form and spell properly.

3) If you or an expert has selected samples to be evaluated and you know what attributes these samples are (Good
vs Bad), enter this information in the STANDARD column. This will enable you to determine how well each operator can evaluate a set of samples against a known standard. You do not need to enter information in this column for the spreadsheet to work, although you will not be able to assess the operators against known standards.

4) You do not have to specify how many operators or the # of samples that you will be evaluating during the test.
Simply enter the data into the spreadsheet under the specific operator. Remember the attributes must be spelled properly or the spreadsheet will not analyze the data correctly.

5) To print a copy of the report click on the Print Report icon. 6) To delete the data in the spreadsheet, click on the Delete Data icon. 7) To see a Demo of the Attribute GR&R Effectiveness spreadsheet, click on the Demo icon. Move around the
spread sheet to see the data. When you are finished, click the Delete Data icon to delete all data to begin entering your own data. NOTES:

The 95% UCL and 95% LCL represent the 95% upper and lower confidence limits on the binomial distribution. The Calculated Score is the basic computation reported on the report page for % Appraiser and % Score vs Attribute. The 95% confidence interval represents the range within which the true Calculated Score lies given the uncertainty associated with limited sample sizes. As sample size increases (in this case, Total Inspected) the confidence interval will get smaller and smaller which indicates more reliable estimates of the true percentages. In the case of the Demo data, the true Calculated score for Operator 1 could be as low as 76.8% given that only 14 samples inspected, even though there was a 100% Appraiser value calculated. Also, even though Operator 2 had a lower score, Operators 1 and 3 cannot be distinguished from Operator 2 because the calculated score of #2 (78.6%) lies within the confidence limits for Operators 1 and 3. With a worksheet limitation of 100 samples, the best the lower 95% limit can be is 96.4%. Thus, we would have to say that the best an inspector could be is 96% efficient; even though they did not make any mistakes.

Try different combinations of number of samples and number of matches to see the effects of sample size. EXAMPLE: a sample size of 30 with one non-match will yield a 17% confidence interval. In order to get reasonable reliability in estimates of efficiency, large sample sizes will be required.

ENTRADA DE DATOS - ESTUDIO DE VARIACION DE CALIBRES POR ATRIBUTOS

Todos los Inspectores coinciden en si mismos y entre ellos C. AYMIMIR SI/NO Intento 1 Intento 2 Intento 3 Intento 1 Intento 2 Intento 3 Intento 1 Intento 2 Intento 3 Acuerdo SI/NO Acuerdo SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI NO NO NO SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI

Definicin de los Atributos

(Introducir los valores) 1 2

DIA: CALIBRE: PRODUCTO: PROCESO:

1 0

PASS FAIL

05-Aug-2013 M-34106 1637 COQUILLAS

Opcional: Introducir el nombre del Inspector o dejar la opcin predeterminada D. MARTIN Muestra Conocida Muestra 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 Patrn F. REBOLLAR

1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1

1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1

1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1

1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1

1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1

1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1

1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1

1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1

1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1

1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1

SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI NO NO NO SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI

Todos los inspectores coinciden con el patrn

INFORME DE RECUENTOS

42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI

SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI SI

99 100 % Puntuacin del Inspector(1) -> 100.00% 96.00% 96.00% 96.00% 96.00% Sistema % Eficacia del resultado(3) -> 94.00% 94.00% % INSPECTOR FRENTE PATRON(2) -> 100.00%

Sistema % Eficacia del Resultado vs Patrn(4) -> Observaciones: (1) Inspector Acepta en todos sus resultados (2) Inspector Acepta en todos sus resultados con el Patrn Conocido (3) Todos los Inspectores concuerdan en sus resultados y en los del resto (4) Todos los Inspectores concuerdan en sus resultados y en los del resto y adems concuerdan con los del patr (5) Introducir Bueno/Malo, OK/NOK, ACEPTADO/RECHAZADO o el criterio elegido que indique el estado de inspeccin

INFORME ESTADISTICO - ESTUDIO DE VARIACION DE CALIBRES POR ATRIBUTOS

FECHA 5-Aug-2013 PRODUCTO 1637 % INSPECTOR1 Fuente Total Inspeccionado Correspondencias 95% LCS Resultado Calculado 95% LCI D. MARTIN 50 50 100.0% 100.0% 94.2% F. REBOLLAR 50 48 99.5% 96.0% 86.3% C. AYMIMIR 50 48 99.5% 96.0% 86.3% CALIBRE PROCESO: M-34106 COQUILLAS

% INSPECTOR FRENTE PATRON2 D. MARTIN 50 50 100.0% 100.0% 94.2% 0 0 0 F. REBOLLAR 50 48 99.5% 96.0% 86.3% 0 0 2 C. AYMIMIR 50 48 99.5% 96.0% 86.3% 0 0 2

Falso Negativo (Inspector tiende hacia el rechazo) Std = Pass Falso Positivo (Inspector tiende hacia la aceptacin) Std = Fail Dudosos (Inspector Acepta y Rechaza la misma Pieza) Sistema % Eficacia del resultado3 Total Inspeccionado Conforme 95% LCS Resultado Calculado 95% LCI 50 47 98.7% 94.0% 83.5%

Sistema % Eficacia del Resultado vs Patrn4 50 47 98.7% 94.0% 83.5%

% INSPECTOR
95% LCS
100.0% 90.0%

% INSPECTOR FRENTE PATRON

95% LCI
100.0%

Resultado Calculado

95% LCS

Resultado Calculado

95% LCI

90.0%
80.0%

80.0% 70.0%

70.0%

% Eficiencia

60.0% 50.0% 40.0%

% Eficiencia
1 2 3

60.0%

50.0%
40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0%

30.0% 20.0%
10.0% 0.0%

0.0%
1 2 3

Notas 1) Inspector Acepta en todos sus resultados 2) Inspector Acepta en todos sus resultados con el Patrn Conocido 3) Todos los Inspectores concuerdan en sus resultados y en los del resto 4) Todos los Inspectores concuerdan en sus resultados y en los del resto y adems concuerdan con los del patrn

INFORME ESTADISTICO - ESTUDIO DE VARIACION DE CALIBRES POR ATRIBUTOS

CONCLUSIONES DE LOS RESULTADOS DE LA VARIACION

Criterio de Aceptacin Inspector Conforme

Eficacia 90% 80 %

Ratio de Fallos 2% 5%

Ratio Falsas Alarmas 5% 10 %

Inspector medianamente aceptable Inspector Inaceptable < 80 % >5% > 10%

Eficacia INSPECTOR A en % INSPECTOR B en % INSPECTOR C en % 100.00 96.00 96.00

Fallos 0.00 1.96 1.96

Fal Alar 0.00 1.01 1.01

Un Resultado en Rojo el Inspector es inaceptable para el mtodo, tomar correcciones Un Resultado en amarillo el Inspector es medianamente aceptable, debera mejorarse Un Resultado en verde, el inspector es apto para realizar la medicin

OBSERVACIONES

ANALIZADO POR Y FECHA:

D. MARTIN

8/7/2013