The Binary Fallacy and the End of Both Political

Parties
Written by Michael Collins
Sunday, 07 June 2009
http://www.apj.us/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2434&Itemid=2
Michael Collins is not amused: "The two parties and the elitists who look down their
noses on the overwhelming majority of citizens assume that the people will simply
tolerate the creation of a catastrophe by one party and the perpetuation of that grave
injustice to citizens by the other."

June 6, 2009 – Washington, DC (electionfraudnews.com) – The results of eight years of

Bush-Cheney at the helm make the demise of the Republican Party an easy call. Our
financial system is on life support. The major banks are insolvent, according to banking
and legal authority William K. Black. If they're not, they're in intensive care. No matter
how many trillions of dollars worth of infusions they receive, they're not making loans.
The economy is in a free fall with growth down 6% a quarter and job losses running at
nearly 600,000 a month. We're stuck in two catastrophic wars. Despite President
Obama's election, we're viewed with suspicion and disregard throughout the world.

The public knows which party bears the primary blame for all of this and they're not
about to forget any time soon. The Republican Party is headed for the political
graveyard.

They're not going to rely on past achievements though. Through their self-proclaimed
national leader, the odious Rush Limbaugh, they've chosen to attack the first Latino
nominee to the Supreme Court, Judge Sonia Sotomayor, for being a "racist." Former
Oxycontin addict Limbaugh said, "She brings a form of bigotry and racism to the court."
He went on to say that nominating her was like nominating Klansman and Aryan Nation
advocate David Duke for the highest court.
These charges are quite literally bizarre, particularly with Limbaugh calling anyone else a
racist. Newt Gingrich has joined Limbaugh in a duet of stupidity. This is appropriate
since Gingrich is the architect of the power and policies used by Republicans to drive the
nation into its current crisis.

The political impact for Republicans will be devastating. Sotomayor is the first Latino
nominated to the Supreme Court. Latinos represent the fastest growing ethnic group in
the United States. They went for Obama 67% to McCain’s 33%, and comprised 9% of
the electorate in 2008. Among Latino youth, the fastest growing segment of the Latino
population, the choice was 76% Obama compared to 19% McCain.

Sotomayor is also a woman nominee. Women comprised 53% of the electorate in 2008
and they went for Obama 56% to 43% for McCain. Many of those women are working
and struggle with fools like Rush Limbaugh and Newt Gingrich on a regular basis.

The Republicans are like an early adolescent frenetically trying on new identities, each
seemingly stranger than the last. Led by the Southern wing, the party began by opposing
the bailout for the big three U.S. automakers. Acting as though the nation doesn't need
any heavy industry or a few million people don't need a job, their mask of fiscal rigor hid
the fact that key southern states have the manufacturing base for major foreign
automakers.

They then turned to Rush and, at the same time, held a national protest in April.
Sparsely attended, this nationwide event acquired the unfortunate name of "Tea bagging."
It failed to produce anything more than some Jerry Springer quality footage for a brief
spot on local news. Recently, the national Republican Party, backed by early presidential
aspirant Gingrich, tried to rename the Democrats as the "Democratic Socialist Party."
There is no end in sight to this parade of irrelevant, out of touch efforts.

We're now seeing the final phases of the Republican dance macabre. The Limbaugh-
Gingrich anti-Latino campaign is so dangerous that some Republican senators, including
right wing Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), are moving away from the slanders against
Sotomayor. John McCain (R-AZ) also sees the implications for his party. He's signed up
to attend the National Council of La Raza conference this summer to counter the anti
Latino rhetoric spread by other Republican leaders.

Democratic loyalists are acting as though the Republican demise is an accomplishment

on their part. It is as though their understated -- but very complicit -- support of the
Republican policies of empire and wealth transfer to the ultra wealthy will go unnoticed.

Congressional Democrats voted in the majority to authorize the Iraq invasion. They
voted in the majority to fund the Iraq adventure long after the lies leading to war were
well known. A majority of Senate Democrats voted for the Patriot Act. A Democratic
controlled Senate allowed further government spying on personal communication (FISA
Amendments) in 2008 and a third of Senate Democrats supported the Military
Commissions Act of 2006, which gutted habeas corpus.

Democrats voted for the initial Wall Street welfare bill; also known as the bailout. Right
now, the Obama administration is responsible for doubling the Bush administrations cash
transfer form the U.S. Treasury to Wall Street and the banks. Democrats failed to pass
the only major bill to ease rampant foreclosures. This left 1.7 million families likely to
lose their homes. Democrats did pass a credit card reform bill but forgot to cap those
29% interest limits that the banks arbitrarily assign.

There was an announced policy to leave Iraq. To date, all we've seen are plans to open
up a new phase of the Afghan war with tens of thousands of troops simply switching job
assignments from Iraq to an even more treacherous landscape. Ominously, we now have
plans for super embassy in Pakistan to rival the fortress constructed in Iraq.

Democrats don't want people to see pictures of Bush-Cheney torture from the prison at
Guantanamo, probably because it occurred with funding that they helped provide. They
don't want to close that facility if it means housing prisoners in the United States. This
forced their president into the extraordinary and troubling position of maintaining current
prisoners in Cuba. As the Democratic Senators participated in the 90 to 6 vote to refuse
President Obama funds to close Guantanamo, they were resolute in failing to mention
that only10 of over 400 prisoners there are charged with a violent crime. To borrow an
appropriate response, You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, at long last?
Apparently not.

Democrats won't even talk about the deaths of over a million Iraqi civilians due to civil
strife caused by the war that they funded. Failing to talk about it means it never
happened, they hope.

Despite all of the alleged but obvious crimes of Bush-Cheney against people here and
around the world, the Democrats want to "look forward" and bypass prosecutions of any
sort against the Bush administration.

The Binary Fallacy

The binary fallacy is the crude dialectic that assumes that the two political parties are the
only choices for voters and that what's bad for one party will always be good for the
other. As evidence for this, we have Nixon's Watergate scandal followed by huge
Democratic victories in congressional elections. President Carter's economically
distressed four years begat the Reagan revolution and so forth.

Democrat Party operatives see the collapse of the nation and attendant pain as working
against the Republicans since they were in control when the decline was assured by
Republican sponsored programs. The situation is so bad, they argue, no one will take the
Republicans seriously over the near and midterm. Add the highly favorable
demographics among youth, women, and the emerging Latino population and you've got
the dominant political party of the next few decades.

Republican loyalists speak of the risks that the Obama administration has inherited.
When he falters, as he may given the circumstances that Republicans know all too well,
his failure will assure a Republican comeback they argue.

Both parties fail to realize two flaws in their embedded fallacy.

First, the fallacy became a manufactured truth over decades due to the rigged game of
U.S. politics. Funding and access to major media presume membership in one of the two
major parties. Third party candidates need to poll equal or ahead in the public opinion
polls, as Ross Perot did in 1992, in order to get any media attention or money. When the
system is heavily rigged to exclude third parties, then, of course, there are only two
choices.

The second flaw in the binary fallacy is embodied by our current troubles. The fallacy
does not take into account successful performance during extreme crises. We're either in
a depression or we're in the most severe financial crisis since the Great Depression.
Times are desperate for tens of millions. The vast majority lives in fear of entering the
world of the unemployed, homeless, and bereft. Iraq is the biggest foreign policy disaster
in modern times. Our new plans for an Afghanistan adventure have the potential to equal
Iraq in terms of national loss and increased threats of blowback.

One party created the current disaster. The other has embraced the broadest parameters
of the policies that created the disasters that voters want fixed -- wealth transfers to the
ultra rich while the vast majority gets just about nothing plus mindless, counter
productive fantasies of empire through war.

The two parties and the elitists who look down their noses on the overwhelming majority
of citizens assume that the people will simply tolerate the creation of a catastrophe by one
party and the perpetuation of that grave injustice to citizens by the other.

When you're broke, you know it.

When you're out of work, you know it.

When there are no jobs, you know it.

And when the country continues to fight overseas but does nothing to protect economic
security at home, you know it.

The game is up. The party is over. The people have a fundamental right to survive, at
the very least. If both parties continue to promote policies that leave out almost all
citizens, as is now the case, there will be alternatives that look nothing like the current
two political parties. The binary fallacy and the two parties that fail to address our crises
will be no more. Relying solely on the failures of the opposing party while embracing
their programs will soon be defunct.

Reprinted with permission of the author. Further reproduction in part or whole is

authorized by the author with attribution of authorship and a link to this article.

Michael Collins is a writer who focuses on clean elections and voting rights. He is the
publisher of the web site ElectionFraudNews.com. His Scoop Independent News articles
can be found here.