Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Organization
< sentences are larger phrases < sentences are endocentric constructions round a head
the head =?
S 3 Subject Predicate
the head?????
a. *Dan Diaconescu be crazy. b. Dan Diaconescu must be crazy. a. *Dan Diaconescu buy Oltchim. b. Dan Diaconescu will buy Oltchim.
(3)
Modal
verbs : Tense and modality Modal verbs: always in front of the lexical verb
Modals and auxiliaries occur in front of the lexical verb assume that T/Agr precedes VP
IP 3 Spec SUBJECT I 3
I HEAD
VP PREDICATE
The structure of IP
/z/ = 3rd person sg + present tense
Inflection : both T and Agr = the split-IP hypothesis (Pollock 1989) Nous dessinons we draw-1st pl Nous dessinions we draw-past -1st pl
The structure of IP
French, Romanian .
T 3 T VP
The structure of IP
The order in which the morphemes occur provides information with respect to the place which the two projections occupy in the structure of IP. The closer a morpheme is to the lexical stem, the closer to the VP it is in the representation of the clause.
The structure of IP
Baker (1985) : The Mirror Principle Morphological affixes appear in the order in which they apply in the syntax// Morphological structure is a reflection of syntactic operations.
The structure of IP
Back to English: /z/ : both T and Agr We will assume: IP for English
The structure of IP
IP 3
Spec
I
I 3
VP
{T/Agr/Mood/Asp}
The structure of IP
IP 3
I
2
I /d/ /z/ VP
The structure of IP
IP 3
I
2
I have be do VP
The structure of IP
IP 3 Spec I can may could will I 3 VP 3
The structure of IP
IP 3
You
I
3
{2nd
sg. Present}
So far..
in spite of the difference between bound and free morphemes, they are outside the VP they carry tense/agreement/modality information
they are hosted by Inflection
So far...
a sentence is a hierarchically structured entity the head of a sentence is Inflection ( Infl/I) a sentence is a projection of I = an Inflection Phrase (IP) the elements hosted by I carry Tense: auxiliaries, modals, bound morphemes I selects VP as a complement IP is the functional domain of the verb
The structure of IP
IP 3 Spec I 3 I /d/,/z/ modals aux VP 3
The structure of IP
We have placed modals and auxiliaries outside the VP we need evidence that they are outside the VP, i.e. that they can be separated from the VP
We have assumed that Inflection hosts both free morphemes (aux, modals) and bound morphemes BUT: He will arrive vs. He arrived we need to explain why/how they all occupy, at some point, I.
The teacher explained the status of AUX. What the teacher did was {explain the status of AUX.} {Explain the status of AUX} is what the teacher did.
Evidence <movement
And we will {provide evidence} And {provide evidence} we will
Modals, aux, tense morphemes are outside the VP, which can be moved away from a modal/an aux/the bound morpheme
Evidence <VP-ellipsis
We have provided evidence and they have {provided evidence} too. We can provide evidence and they can {provide evidence} too. He provides evidence and John does {provide evidence} too.
VP-ellipsis shows that the VP and the auxiliary/modal/bound morpheme can be separated, i.e. they represent constituents different from the VP which contains the lexical verb
Summing up...
Aux, modals, tense/agr morphemes: can be split from the VP Modals and aux always occupy a position in front of the lexical verbs Aux, modals, tense/agr morphemes: head their own projection; at one point, they occupy a position in the functional domain of the verb
Modal verbs
Q: the English modals: lexical or functional?
A1: lexical verbs A2: a distinct morpho-syntactic class
31
Modal verbs
Modality: (i) possibility (ii) necessity
MODALS of possibility: CAN, MAY, COULD, MIGHT MODALS of necessity: MUST, SHOULD, NEED, OUGHT + MODALS of prediction/volition: WILL, SHALL.
32
Modal verbs
A1 < SUBSTANTIVE CONTENT, like lexical verbs
The train must have been delayed. = necessity (probability) They may be still waiting for us at the station. = possibility logical inference from the given circumstances
33
[+V] = the capacity to license an argument and assign a theta-role to its argument Do modal verbs meet this requirement?
Modal verbs
= the modals make a common semantic contribution:
they indicate the degree of force with which the situation denoted by the VP is asserted/ the way in which the speaker evaluates the situation
She may look nice. She can look nice when she has her hair done. She must look very nice if she is a model.
35
Modal verbs
But, unlike lexical verbs, they lack an event structure their semantic function is to modify the content of another verb / of another sentence
John might have killed the cat. They neednt have sent them the letter.
Modal verbs
lack the capacity of assigning theta-roles to their argument They may have left early. MAY { they have left early} She must have missed the train. MUST {she has missed the train} they do not project an external-argument they c-select their internal argument
Modal verbs
Lexical verbs denote EVENTS have an event structure
Modals do NOT denote EVENTS do NOT have an event structure do not project an external argument C-select their argument
38
Modal verbs
A2 : < the English modals have a set of morpho-syntactic properties which distinguish them from lexical verbs
= they are NICE
Negation can attach to the modal, without DO-support Inversion (subject-modal) is possible in interrogative sentences and in tags Code: they can appear in codes Emphatic affirmation
39
Modal verbs
I cannot dance. *I do not can dance. Must they leave? *Do they must leave?
I can dance and so can Bill. *I can dance and so does Bill.
You SHALL have the money by tomorrow. *You do shall have the money by tomorrow.
Modal verbs
such properties clearly distinguish the English modals from lexical verbs and show that they behave like the auxiliaries have, be and do = AUX are also NICE !
41
Modals are incompatible with non-finite forms: a. *They are canning to do it now. b. *To can or not to can, that is the question. c. *They have must(ed) do it for a long time.
a. They may have been punished for what they had done. b. We might have gone about half a mile
42
Modal verbs
John could play the piano when he was five. They can speak Persian. * They have could speak Persian.
Modals
Modal verbs
they have no passive form they have no imperative they cannot co-occur, with the exception of certain dialects: a. You might would say that. b. I don't feel as if I should ought to leave. (Southern USA)
44
So far...
The English modals : a distinct morpho-syntactic class They merge in Inflection because they are always tensed
45
Modals
IP 2
Spec
I 3
VP
I [+T]
modals
Modals
IP 2
Spec
I 2
VP 5
I modals
Modals
IP 2
Spec I John 2
I can VP 5 dance
Modals
IP 2
Spec I They 2
I may VP 5 leave
no event structure BE+ PRESENT PARTICIPLE do not assign theta-roles HAVE + PAST PARTICIPLE do not project an external argument c-select their complement
Auxiliaries
One important difference:
(i) (ii)
Modals are inherently tensed; they lack non-finite forms Auxiliaries : present vs. past tense forms, they have non-finite forms
Auxiliaries
Auxiliaries are always preceded by the modal; in this case they are uninflected for tense They may have left. They may have been talking about the movie. They may have been forgiven.
Auxiliaries
I modals
Auxiliaries
He may have left. IP 3 Spec I He 3 I VP/ AuxP may 5 have left
Auxiliaries
Have and be are base-generated under VP; they reach Inflection as a result of movement. They move to Inflection to merge with Tense (and Agreement) markers/ to check their T (and Agr) features
Auxiliaries
IP 2 Spec I 2 I VP 5 V VP
have be
Auxiliaries
IP 2 Spec I 2 I VP 5 V VP
has left the country
Auxiliaries
IP 2 Spec I 2 I VP has 5 V VP t left the country g
Spec
I 2
VP 5
I modals
Spec They
I 2
VP 5 have left
I may
Auxiliaries
IP 2
Spec I They 2
I may VP 5 be leaving
Auxiliaries
IP 2
Spec I They 2
I VP 5 are leaving
Auxiliaries
IP 2
Spec I They 3
I are VP 5 t leaving
Spec I They 3
I have VP 5 t left
Auxiliaries
They are always buying smart phones! They have never read this book.
= NOT is always in front of the lexical verb = only auxiliaries and modals can be directly negated by not/nt.
Auxiliaries: summing up
Have
So far...
Bound morphemes
(1) (2) (3)
John will ask Mary to marry him after the LEC exam. John asked Mary to marry him after the LEC exam. John asks a girl to marry him after each LEC exam.
Bound morphemes
John must have left. must + VP Infl VP John leaves tomorrow. V /z/ = ????
bound morphemes
The Stranded Affix Filter an affix must be attached to a host, it cannot remain stranded. the stranded affix [/d/ or /z/] must merge with a free morpheme
Bound morphemes
IP 2 IP 2 Spec I /z/ I 2 VP 5 arrive
Spec I 2
I /z/ VP 5 arrive
bound morphemes
bound morphemes
a. She always teaches syntax. b. She will always teach syntax. c. She has already told us about IP.
Bound morphemes
IP 3 She I 3 I VP /z/ 3 AdvP VP 5 5 often teach syntax
Auxiliaries
IP 3 She I 3 I VP /z/ 2 AdvP VP 5 5 often teach syntax
Bound morphemes
* She
Auxiliaries
IP 3 She I 3 I VP
/z/ 3 AdvP VP 5 5 often teach syntax
Auxiliaries
In English, lexical verbs do not move to Inflection to allow the affix to attach to a verb. Instead, the affix lowers to V .