Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Page 1 of 4
Defining and Setting Quality Objectives for Each Organization Function and Level
ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 - Questions and Discussions
The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 - Quality Management Systems > ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 - Questions and Discussions
Forum User Name Forum User Name c Remember Me? d e f g Password Today's Posts Log in Search
Defining and Setting Quality Objectives for Each Organization Function and Level
Register Photo Albums Blogs FAQ Community Calendar
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2 Elsmar Forum Sidebar Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes #9 Posts: 54 Thanks Given to Others: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts Karma Power: 31 Karma: 10 30th December 2004, 08:15 AM
Custom Search
Search
MVladimir
Involved - Posts Registration Date: Sep 2004 Location: Moscow, Russia
Follow Elsmar
Who should establish the purposes for concrete function and level? For example, for Purchasing department or Sales department (function)? The general director, which disposes of all resources or the head of department or still somebody?
Thread Tags
Tag Cloud
Lean Six Sigma Complete training materials to teach Lean Six Sigma courses. CorporateTrainingMaterials.com Productivity Calculator Improving Productivity Made Easy With The Impact Assessment Tool. Impact.wph.com.sg
#10 Posts: 20,668 Thanks Given to Others: 5,243 Thanked 3,564 Times in 2,275 Posts Blog Entries: 3 Karma Power: 939 Karma: 23072
Marc
Your Elsmar Cove Host Registration Date: Jan 1996 Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA Age: 61
I would think each departmental 'head' would come up with objectives for their department. Usually these come from upper management meetings where, for example, a departmental manager presents his/her objectives and goals. Agreements are made there and passed down. Yes, sometimes they are not 'agreed to' but rather are 'directed' by upper management. Either way, it is typical for each departmental manager (or whatever the title) to also have additional objectives and goals he/she wants to see in addition to 'hand me downs'. Also see this thread on Determining and Defining Measurable Objectives in ISO 9001:2000 Clause 5
Sponsored Links
Ads by Google
30th December 2004, 09:01 AM
ISO 9001
QMS
Smart Goals
Smart Objectives
#11 Posts: 54 Thanks Given to Others: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts Karma Power: 31 Karma: 10
MVladimir
Involved - Posts Registration Date: Sep 2004 Location: Moscow, Russia
Marc, I agree that the objectives should be coordinated and interconnected between various levels. And this work should be carried out consistently: first, top management should declare the objectives of the enterprise, and then a departmental managers should formulate the objectives of their departments. How it is expedient for registering in QMS documents? What types of QMS documents may be used for this purpose? Who should approve departments objectives?
http://elsmar.com/Forums/showthread.php?t=10486&page=2
27/12/2011
Defining and Setting Quality Objectives for Each Organization Function and Level - P... Page 2 of 4
#12 Posts: 20,668 Thanks Given to Others: 5,243 Thanked 3,564 Times in 2,275 Posts Blog Entries: 3 Karma Power: 939 Karma: 23072
Marc
Your Elsmar Cove Host Registration Date: Jan 1996 Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA Age: 61
Management Review is the major document, but if you have departmental meetings you can take minutes of them as well. As to approval, departmental managers would approve their own and the ones upper management sets they would approve. It doesn't have to be, for example, a formal, written statement "I approve". It can be shown by consensus in a meeting. Don't over complicate. But - Always make sure objectives and goals are written down (or electronic or whatever 'documented'). And you have to show you are meassuring them and whether or not you're meeting goals. And if you aren't meeting documented goals, be ready to show you have identified that fact through measurement and what you are doing to reverse the negative trend.
#13 Posts: 54 Thanks Given to Others: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts Karma Power: 31 Karma: 10
MVladimir
Involved - Posts Registration Date: Sep 2004 Location: Moscow, Russia
#14 Posts: 52 Thanks Given to Others: 4 Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts Karma Power: 39 Karma: 60
Nadeem A.
Involved - Posts Registration Date: Jan 2003 Location: Canada
I was sick during the last three days because of changing weather and come back to the net just right at the moment. Really, received a great inputs on functions and levels and the picture is quite clear now. Thanks Marc and other cove buddies for taking part in this thread, however it was discussed upto some extent already. Now, in simple words: Function means department (Marketing, Engineering, Production, Quality, ..) Level means personnel positions (Top Management, Senior Mangement,...) Corporate (Higher Level) and Departmental Objectives (Lower Level) should make a link to promote quality policy.
It is my quick response for your messages. Thanks all. __________________ Nadeem Alam
#15 Posts: 1,576 Thanks Given to Others: 418 Thanked 452 Times in 298 Posts Blog Entries: 3 Karma Power: 158 Karma: 4342
BorisS
Courtesy Access Registration Date: Jan 2002 Location: United Kingdom
I agree with a lot of what has been said above. The main point though is to ensure that the objectives and targets related to quality should start at the top of the organization. Sidney had it right with his examples: "- improving on-time delivery performance - reducing lead times - reduce time to market - improve invoice accuracy - increase nurse-to-patient ratio - reduce average call waiting times" The objectives and targets should be set here and then if required objectives set for the various functions within the organization: Sales may have an objective to agree lead times with all large customers Production may have an objective to achieve the weekly production schedule Logistics may have an objective for delivery schedule adherence
$ Contributor Forum Access
http://elsmar.com/Forums/showthread.php?t=10486&page=2
27/12/2011
Defining and Setting Quality Objectives for Each Organization Function and Level - P... Page 3 of 4
Each of these objectives contributes to the company level objectives but there should not be a functional objective without a company level one. IMHO this is one area where the standard is not being effectively implemented / assessed.
Courtesy Quick Links
As for levels - taking the first from the list above again if there is an overall objective for Sales of agreeing lead times then there may be: a departmental target to have done this by the end of the next period and
Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge: Howard's International Quality Services Atul's Symphony Technologies Marcelo Antunes' SQR Consulting
each account manager (at the next level down) will have this target for the accounts they manage. They may then set targets for the sales administration personnel to send out letters with revised terms and conditions to all named contacts by the end of the month.
This is not rocket science - some people call it policy deployment, some management by objectives. What is required is that the system follows the business objectives and that there is a Plan Do Check Act cycle in place to monitor this objective setting process. __________________ Rgds, Boris There has to be a better way .... surely?
NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers Quality Digest Portal IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology ASQ - American Society for Quality
#16 Posts: 2,388 Thanks Given to Others: 258 Thanked 424 Times in 264 Posts Blog Entries: 2 Karma Power: 245 Karma: 7871
RCBeyette
When in doubt - THINK! Registration Date: Jan 2002 Location: Ontario, Canada Age: 37
All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Quote: Originally Posted by Paul Simpson What is required is that the system follows the business objectives and that there is a Plan Do Check Act cycle in place to monitor this objective setting process.
I couldn't agree with you more, Paul! When my organization was first introduced to the concepts of objectives and targets and goals, we were very good at documenting what we wished to achieve and by when...not so good, however, at the "how" part. It took some time for people to realize that there was no magic fairy wand that would improve us from Point A to Point B. We needed time, people, skills, resources, commitment, leadership, focus and improved communication. So off we went with a partially-developed Plan, not much Do, very good at Check...and when it came to Act, well, it got a little embarassing. Over time, we've evolved to a system that included dedicated resources to planning, dedicated resources to doing, dedicated resources to checking and dedicated resources to acting...all while still fulfilling our primary goals of safety, environmental compliance and meetings the needs of our 5 Stakeholders. __________________ ~ Roxane ~
"There's a fine line between genius and insanity. I have erased this line." - Oscar Levant
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Lower Navigation Bar The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 - Quality Management Systems > ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 - Questions and Discussions
Defining and Setting Quality Objectives for Each Organization Function and Level Do you find this thread helpful and informational?
0
Bookmarks Facebook Digg Google StumbleUpon
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
Forum Posting Settings You You You You may may may may not not not not post new threads post replies post attachments edit your posts
http://elsmar.com/Forums/showthread.php?t=10486&page=2
27/12/2011
Defining and Setting Quality Objectives for Each Organization Function and Level - P... Page 4 of 4
BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Jump Forum Rules ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 - Questions and Discussions
6 Go
Glen D
ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 - Questions and Discussions
11
d.denny
ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 - Questions and Discussions
golfpark
Quality Objectives Vs. Quality Policy Setting Quality Objectives and Goals
Brian0612
Thomas Kurian
ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 - Questions and Discussions
12
The time now is 10:18 PM. All times are GMT -4. The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options. Contact Marc - Elsmar Cove Site Home Page - Elsmar Cove Index (Ar) - Privacy & Copyright Statement - Top
The Deming PDCA Cycle Auditing Information Identifying Waste Discovering Change 8-D Problem Solving Pull Systems Process Capability - Cp vs. Cpk
QMS Implementation Statistics Lead Time Reduction Histogram Animation Fishbone / Cause and Effects Animation
FMEA Information Error Proofing (Poka Yoke) Planned Maintenance Process Loop Animation
(513) 341-6272 If you are having problems Registering, Activating your Registration, or other problems, you can phone me in the US. I'm not here 24/7/365, but if I'm here I'll try to help.
The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree* - Feel free to Share! Attribution appreciated!
http://elsmar.com/Forums/showthread.php?t=10486&page=2
27/12/2011