Observes Over The Roof

A very famous saying that man has been generated on the nature of the God the
omnipotent. Nothing as the God the same thing is with man. Nobody could have taken
over the God. It is impossible to think or image the God. Nothing is universe that
has powar/shakti to excessive next the God. What could be made from the God in
movment the much following nobody has knoweldge or can be obtained the knoweldge
from wherever or anyone in universe. The God is not generated from anyone. The God
is not a creation like others. However it is a perfect one and over the doubt and
the truth of the rejectabe that the God the omnipotent is that one in itself and
nothing it is other or wherever in universe like he or other is like he in
universe. It can express every thing as that is in the relative existence but it
could not expressed from anyone in universe.
This is a decisive and universal fact that man is the best and incomparable
creation of the God. Its heart, soul and brain do not introduce limitations or
boundations. These three, the heart the soul and the brain a man never do remain
to an only one or a silent conservation anytime. Man has limitless desires,
thoughts, sensibility, emotions, ideas, point of the sights and many innumerevoli
things even have here room in its own body. This fact is full of displeasure that
one; when man wants to express something, tact of same in itself impotent words.
Alphabet of languages is dressed short how much to within of usury for an
elephent.
The words are only symbals for the things or thoughts or sensibility or emotions
but is not since is in their existence. When a word exits from the lepidottero of
a man who only refers to that thing or thought or sensibility or emotion or
situation. We understand them because the images already have been conserved in
the mind and with these images we understand the meanings of the words. Here a
sure thing otherwise could be happened that perhaps it has generated a sure
misunderstanding.
For expample
Union of shanno the two times in a wek. (Shanno ki shadi haftay main doo baar)
This phrase generates the confusion that is:
Shanno is a woman who obtains two times union in week. The relative means are not
a good and credible mrs.
The fact is this that is name of a drama that could be watched two times to the
television in week
Roko mat janay doo can be under stood:
Roko, mat janay doo (stop and does not to go)
Roko mat, janay doo (Does not stop leaves to go)
The first phrase demonstrates this fact that to observe under the roof it is not
suficent. It is necessary for explaning or the understanding, trying that the side
of the wall or under but observing over the roof cannot only be ignored in order
to obtain the meanings of the relevet and of the exect of the words.
The second phrase is eliminating this fact that it lists to it is equipped special
attention also demanded and this power/shakti of the God have need of sensative or
second cure demanded in the relative uses to the places, the occissions, the
events and the different situations.
The things, the birds, atmosphare, animals as also thinking to one sure object
etc. of details of what all the countries are not same over the world. As other
living colleagues of the countries will understand to them because here the images
are not conserved or available in the minds. Khora, changair or charkha are things
of subcountinent. Man others of the country will not understand or image these
things.
Charkha is an industrial thing and while it is in use it gives the different
sounds. A man who does not know what is charkha, to understand the relative sounds
or image is not possiable for him.
Hundreds birds and animals are in the world. They have own speaking sounds for the
situations and the different occosions. We have only name of their speaking
sounds.
As an example
The words bark for the dog or the female;
chrip for the birds,
brag for ass is famous and within and very famous for us. As the type these
speaking sounds is, the words are not exaplan.
The poet says that the nightangle is singing. Like the type this sings, this word
is not explaning. The reader must understand it through its own vision, images and
knowelge.
Many words cannot in spoken in or in our knoweldge of the book but as the type
their sounds is igniting or their partically existence, in the words they are to
explain. My talk indicates that the words cannot fullfil the needs of the thoughts
originate them, of the sensibility, emotion or of event man spirit or in the
hearing body.
The words are constructed from the sounds. Someone says that he is pain of
sensibility in my shoulders like countinusely the hiting by a stone. Relative a
test in order to explain the matter that it ignites inside of the body. In fact
nobody is giving of soccer or hiting to the shoulders by a stone. It will be a
stupid understanding that someone has supplied in the shoulder and is here giving
of soccer or hiting by a stone.
The world languages have sounds in order to satisfy not enough man even comman and
the requirements of the daily paper. He is a large one hardle in the sense to
adopt those sounds that have they existence.
As an example
Barking: ba' oon ba' oon we find two here ba and oon
Chrip: cheen cheen we find here that che and een
choon choon we find cho
Mew: miaon It is here aon
Thak Thak the sound of the ak can be adopted
Fatik Fatik the tik and the ik they could have been
obtained annotation
Tip tip ip could be a part of the talks
Kokroonkaroon kok and roon can be used in many new words
Exparts of the languages can obtain many sounds from the nature, air, from the
birds, animal, from the things of operation, the tools of operation in the
industries etc. Through these new sounds the words have been able formated easy.
Their this action of goodness will be useful for a man in its to speak, more well
in the understanding and the writing. Moreover it will lose or less the bardon
than not or wrong understandings.