Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Your memorandum must contain at least 1,800 words. It may be formatted in any way that you wish, but please cite your sources according to accepted conventions. Grading Rubric: Your grade for this assignment will not be based on whether you come to a correct opinion about the case. Instead, you will be evaluated on how well you support and explain your opinions under the issues you have identified. Do your best to identify relevant questions and issues based on what you have learned about tort law this semester. Try to consider all of the legal, social, political, or economic implications or factors in coming up with these questions. Then thoroughly research legal and nonlegal databases to try to find answers to your questions. Remember that you can always revise your questions and issues in light of this research. Form opinions only after considering these sources, and remember to keep track of how you arrived at those opinions. The better you explain the issues you have identified, your reasoning about those issues, and your ultimate opinions about the case, the better you will do on this assignment. This assignment is worth 15% of your final grade. Five percent (5%) will be based on timely submission of your First Draft and active participation in Peer Review. The remaining 10% will be allocated to your Final Draft, which will be evaluated according to the following rubric:
Content: 15 10 points 9 5 points Description of The memorandum clearly and The memorandum describes Case concisely describes all of the the facts of the case, but the facts of the case and further author does not show how shows how these facts are these facts are relevant to the relevant to the issues she or he issues he or she has has identified. If there are identified. There are some any gaps in the record, the relevant gaps in the record author has identified these which the author has not gaps and explained how identified or discussed, the resolution of these factual resolution of which is issues will impact the case. relevant to the case. Content: 25 20 points 19 15 points Quality of The author thoroughly and The author thoughtfully Reasoning thoughtfully examines the examines the issues he or she issues he or she has identified has identified in the case, and in the case, relying upon arrives at an opinion about accepted legal reasoning the case. However, the strategies. The author has authors reasoning needs to arrived at a well-reasoned be further developed and opinion about the case. explained. Content: 25 20 points 19 15 points Quality of The author has thoroughly The author has thoroughly Research researched the issues she or researched the issues he or 4 0 points The memorandum does not sufficiently describe the facts of the case. There are numerous gaps in the record which the author has not identified or discussed, the resolution of which is relevant to the case. 14 0 points The author does not adequately examine the issues he or she has identified in the case. The authors opinion about these case is not explained. 14 0 points The author needs to conduct further research
Grammar and 10-8 points 7-5 points Mechanics All paragraphs and sentences There are some distracting are free or mostly free from surface errors. distracting surface errors. Formatting 5-4 points 3-2 points The paper is formatted There are some errors in professionally and sources are formatting. cited according to accepted conventions.