Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
By
Ir. Dr. Gue See Sew & Ir. Tan Yean Chin
www.gnpgroup.com.my
CONTENTS
a) Introduction b) Ownership/Partnership c) Quality Management System (QMS) d) Capacity Building e) Conclusion
INTRODUCTION
1. What is the Essence of a good engineering consulting firm/group ? 2. How to assure Sustainability of a firm/group ? 3. Why do we need Quality Management System (QMS) ? 4. How to achieve Capacity Building ?
ESSENCE
of a Good Engineering Consulting Firm/Group
VISION
:- To provide One-Stop Quality Service Technical Excellence Reliability & Professionalism Safety
ESSENCE
of a Good Engineering Consulting Firm/Group
MISSION
: Quality Speed Value Adding
QSVa
Action Plan
= Take Action + Closely Follow Up
-monthly
ACHIEVE SUSTAINABILITY !
QMS
SYSTEM
Dr. Edwards Deming
85%/15%
Error due to lack of system or improper system
96%/4%
Human Error
Ref: What is Lean Six Sigma? By Mike George, Dave Rowlands & Bill Kastle (McGraw-Hill)
G&P PROFESSIONALS
Principle 2 = Leadership
Establish unity of purpose and direction of organisation to achieve organisations objectives.
G&P PROFESSIONALS
Success
FOR SUSTAINABILITY Dont go for the whole small cake. Instead, go for a slice of big cake.
Ownership for Associates and above
TRAINING MODULES
Do not be afraid to teach your disciples all your 10 skills. In the unlikely event one of them manages to master all 10 skills, you would have acquired your 11. ctl2000
G&P PROFESSIONALS
10
11
12
Steel plate
Soil face
Shotcrete facing
Main reinforcement
Steel plate
X
Soil face Main reinforcement Shotcrete facing
FACE FAILURE
FACE FAILURE
13
G&P PROFESSIONALS
INNOVATIVENESS (R&D)
Innovation needs R&D culture Standard Design w/o continuing improvement with time is outdated
14
15
16
17
R&D
-
Guidelines / Checklists Interpretation of test results Database Management Contractual Document Software Guru System Operating Procedure Planning Analysis Design
18
Section: OP- 3-37 Revision: 0 Date: 15-10-2001 CHECKLIST FOR SITE VISIT Page 1 of 2 ________________________________________________________________________________ GUE & PARTNERS SDN BHD
WORK INSTRUCTIONS FOR ENGINEERS Compiled by Checked by Approved by : ____FCC_________________ : ____TYC_________________ : ____GSS_________________
19
BENEFITS OF R&D
Source of new information & knowledge Create new instrument and methodology Develop new skills Access to networks of experts and information Ability to solve complex problems Creation of spin off companies
20
G&P PROFESSIONALS
Making
Effective decisions = Analysis of Data and Information (Client Evaluation, Feedback, Complaints, Internal Quality Audits, Performance, etc.)
T Y C / R E V-0 0 / 9 9
Project File
FILE(s) LINK
SECTION 2
SECTION 3
SECTION 4 SECTION 5
SECTION 6 SECTION 7
SECTION 8 SECTION 9
SECTION 10
MISCELLANEOUS
(Working Copies, Draft, Info etc.)
21
Project Assignment
PROJECT ASSIGNMENT
Project No.: Project Title :
: : :
22
Date Date
: :
: : : : : :
B.
Project Team
Project Director Project Engineer(s) Engineer(s)/ Geologist(s) Checker(s) Reviewer(s) External Reviewer(s) : : : : : :
C.
D.
MEETING NOTES
Client : Project : Venue : Purpose of Meeting : Attended by : Time: Departure from G&P / Home Meeting Begins Meeting Ends Arrival at G&P/Home Project No.: No. of Pages : Meeting No.: Made by : Date :
Item
Description of Discussion
Action By
Completion Date
23
Revision No. :
(shall be the same as Work Ref. Revision No.)
Check by :
(Initial)
Review by :
(Initial)
Signature : Date :
Signature : Date :
Rectification Status:
Checklist : (Place X if applicable) 1) Objective & Purpose of Planning / Analysis / Design 2) Concept and Method of Planning / Analysis / Design 3) Subsurface Information and Interpreted Parameters 4) Planning / Analysis / Design 5) Computer Filenames & Path. 6) Summary of Analyses Results and Recommendations 7) Discussions and Conclusions
Note : 1. Activity : SI=Subsurface Investigation; A&D = Analysis & Design; PD = Project Deliverables; TC = Tender/Contract Management; IC = Interpretation of Construction Records & Test Results; CM = Changes/Modification 2. Work Ref. = XXXXX / Status%% / R++/ ### / &&& / @@@ Where XXXXX = Project No.; Status = Check (C) or, Review (W) or, Check & Review (B) ; %% = Number of work in sequence for each project ; R++ = Revision No. (Start with R0 for each Work Ref.) ### = Designer; &&& = Checker; @@@ = Reviewer (if any) 3. From Revision No. 1 (R1) onwards, the %% number shall be the same as Revision No. 0 (R0).
ISO/FormISO/Form -20
Audit Ref No. :
Details of Non-conformity / Potential Non-conformity by Auditor : (Yes / Not Applicable) (Please quote clauses of non -conformity if any)
Project KIV/ Inactive since last ISO Internal Audit Corrective Action(s) by Auditee : Action Due Date : Preventive Action(s) by Auditee : Action Due Date :
Yes
Implementation of the Corrective or / And preventive Action(s) has been satisfactory? (YES / NO) Comments (if NOT satisfactory) : Auditors Signature : Date : Auditees Signature : Date :
Note : A copy shall be retained in Managing Director and Management Representatives File and also in the Project File
24
Audit Checklist
Audit Ref. No : Project No. : Procedure
QP-2-02 2.4.3 QP-2-03 3.4.1 3.4.2 3.4.3
(Geotechnical Consultants)
Audit Date :
Compliance *
Remark
Organisation ?
Has the PQP stated critical stages of work to be reviewed ? Has the PQP duly updated for significant changes to the project identified as in Procedure for Design Changes/Modification (QP-2-07) ? Has the PQP referred to the Procedure for Site Supervision Plan (If No, skip Items 4.4.1 to 4.4.4) ? Site Supervision Plan (SSP, ISO/Form-3) Has the SSP been approved by the Project Director ? Has the SSP outlined the detailed scope of site work and also the associated site supervision duties ? Has the SSP duly updated for significant changes to the project identified as in the Procedure for Design Changes/Modification (QP -2-07) ? Has ISO/Form-15 been used for the nomination of contractors for Tender/ Quotation/ Direct Appointment for Projects ? Has the Contractor/ Laboratory Performance Assessment (ISO/Form-10) been submitted to CAC after completion of site work ? Have the check boxes for the Submission of Records/Reports in Item E (completion of Site Supervision) of Site Supervision Plan ISO/Form -3 been addressed ? N : Not Complying N.A. : Not Applicable
Note : * = Y : Complying
Client Evaluation
CLIENTS EVALUATION OF GUE & PARTNERS SDN BHD (G&P) ; C = Average Description ; D = Fair ; E = Poor Grade
The professionalism of the G&P Project Team. (good code of ethics, safe desi gn) The overall attitude of the G&P Project Team in handling the project. (keen to give professional advice, cooperate well with client and other consultants, able to accept criticism and advice etc.) 3. The overall attention provided by the G&P project team in attending meetings, discussions, site visits, etc. 4. The project deliverables (reports, drawings, BOQ or design etc.) submitted on time and according to schedule agreed. 5. The overall quality of the project deliverables (reports, drawings, BOQ, tender, contract and design etc.) submitted. 6. The technical knowledge and capability of the G&P project team in handling the d esign. (limited to Geotechnical works only) 7. The contractual knowledge of the G&P project team in handling the contractual issues. 8. The knowledge and capability of the G&P project team to handle construction stage of the project like site supervision, solving site issues, design changes etc. (limited to Geotechnical works only). 9. Is our professional fee fairly priced (provide value for money services)? 10. The overall grading for the professional service provided by Gue & Partners Sdn Bhd .
25
PROJECT NO. :
PROJECT TITLE :
CLIENT :
LOCATION :
Elaborate in details the SCOPE (as in Attachment C of PQP ISO/Form-2) : Photocopy and Attach the Attachment C : Project Characterisation of PQP ISO/Form -2 to this Project Summary Form, List of Dos & Donts, Lessons Learned and submit to Quality Manager for keeping.
26
TRUST
More and more transparency Written (Shareholder Agreement) Commercial decision Discipline
27
Dam
Geotechnical
Highway
Hydrology
Infrastructure
Marine
M&E
Architects
Surveyors
Structural
Others
Developers Consultants
Contractors Operators
28
G&P PROFESSIONALS
(Consulting Group)
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
P R O J E C T MANAGEMENT
INFRA
HIGHWAY
MARITIME
ENVIRONMENTAL
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
QUANTITY SURVEYOR
GEOLOGISTS
COMPETITIVENESS
Ingredients a) Capability b) Capacity c) Efficiency
-
d) Innovativeness
Track records Competition
29
CONCLUSION
Partnership or Sdn Bhd
Written agreement (RM)
System
CONCLUSION (cont.)
Formula of Successful Consultancy Firm A combination of good engineers along with continued excellent quality and value adding performance.
30
54 PEOPLE TOOK PART IN THIS CONCERTED ACROBATIC JUMP. FERRARI S PITSTOP WAS COMPLETED BY 15 MECHANICS (FUEL AND TYRES) IN 6.0 SECONDS FLAT.
31