Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
5 Reliability Factors
Chapter 5
RELIABILITY FACTORS
where F(t) is the probability of system failure by time t, and t is a random variable with a density function f(t).
Assuming that the time variable is described by an exponential density function, the reliability function is transformed to *)
This image cannot currently be display ed.
where e is the natural logarithm base, t is the time of interest, and is the mean life.
*) This is equivalent to making the assumption that the number of failures occurring during a time interval are Poisson distributed. The two distribution are the same, except that the exponential distribution is continuous (time) and the Poisson distribution is discrete (number of failures).
Kuliah MS4103 Perawatan Mesin 3
Mean life refers to average lifetimes of all items under consideration and is equal to Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) for the exponential time density function (t). The reciprocal of MTBF expresses the instantaneous failure rate (). Therefore, the reliability function with an exponential time density can also be expressed as:
Assuming an exponential density function for the time variable best represent a scenario where the failure is essentially constant over the useful system operating life time. This is frequently assumed during the course of reliability analysis and predictions. While variable failure rates are experienced during the infant mortality and wear-out periods of a system life cycle, the constant failure rate assumption often work well after the system attains a steady state of operation. Please see the next figure!
Kuliah MS4103 Perawatan Mesin 4
Example 1:
Suppose 10 units of product were tested under specified operating conditions where the test time is 600 hours, and assume that failed units are not repaired. Failures occur as follows: Unit 1 failed after 75 jam Unit 4 failed after 325 jam Unit 2 failed after 125 jam Unit 5 failed after 525 jam Unit 3 failed after 130 jam Five units successfully completed the test cycle. Solution: Failure rate (), in number failures per hour, can be expressed as
Example 2:
Consider a given system with operating cycle as shown in the following figure. The total operating time in this case is 152 hours and the system fails a total of six times as indicated. What is the failure rate of the system?
Down Time
2.1 hr 7.1 hr 4.2 hr 1.8 hr 3.5 hr 8.3 hr
Maintenance Actions
24.2 hr
7.1 hr
27.4 hr
35.3 hr
6.3 hr
46.7 hr
5.0 hr
Operating Time System Operational Cycle 169 Hours Fig. 2 Example of system operation
Kuliah MS4103 Perawatan Mesin 8
Further, assuming an exponential time density function, the system mean life or the MTBF is
Example 3:
A system accumulates 32 failures over a 10,000 hours operating time period. What is the system failure rate, MTBF, and reliability?
Solution:
Using the formulas given previously, we have
Time of Observation, t (hours) 0 50 100 150 200 250 500 1000
Kuliah MS4103 Perawatan Mesin
Reliability (%) 100.00 85.21 72.62 61.88 52.73 44.93 20.19 4.08
10
Seri Network
Component 1 Component 2 Component n
System Reliability, Rs
12
Parallel Network
Component 1 Component 2
Component n
If all components have the same reliability of R, then the system-level reliability becomes
13
Combination Network
Komponen a Komponen b Komponen c Komponen d Komponen e Komponen f Komponen g
where
14
Example 4:
A system consists of 3 sub-assemblies. The individual sub-assembly reliability are R1 = 97 %, R2 = 89 %, R3 = 92 %.
What is the overall system reliability if the sub-assembly are connected (a) in series and (b) parallels?
Solution: (a)
(b)
15
Example 5:
Determine the reliability of the network bellow with given individual reliability values
Component B Component E Component A Component C Component D Component F Component G
Component A
Solution:
The sub system reliability are.
16
where e-t is the first term in a Poisson expansion series and represents the probability of ZERO failures or aborts during the time interval, t. A constant failure rate is assumed in the above equation. Extending the discussion to an operational system with a backup, the applicable equations is
18
Example 6: A system with a failure rate of 0.005 failures/hours is called upon for a mission involving 5 hours of operation. What is the probability of mission success? Is this the same as system reliability? Solution:
Using the equations for the probability of survival.
Example 7: Assume that a system has a reliability of 0.778, and that the value of t = 0,25. Also, the system is supported by two identical backups. Determine the probability of system survival or mission! Solution: By using the equation for the probability of survival, we have:
20
21
The Reliability Growth curve in the Duane model can be expressed as.
where MTBFc and MTBFs are the cumulative and starting MTBF, T is total test or operating time, and is the slope of the growth curve. The slope, , indicates the effectiveness of the reliability growth program and has a strong correlation with the intensity R&D effort of a company. A given reliability growth curve can also be used to assess the test and evaluation time required to attain a target system reliability. The following figure shows a typical reliability growth curve.
22
Exercise Problems:
1. Ten units are tested to failure. Failures occur after 20, 40, 62, 78, 94, 112, 132, 142, 145, and 175 hours. What is the unit failure rate? 2. Twelve units are tested for 100 hours. Failed units are not repaired. Failures occur after 6, 14, 22, 48, 80, and 96 jam. What is the unit failure rate? 3. A system with an overall system level MTBF equal to 120 hours is to be operated for 2.6 hours. What is the system reliability? 4. If a system has reliability equal to 0.80 is to be operated continuously for a time of 1.5 hours, what is the expected failure rate? 5. Over period of 10 years, a system successfully completes 985 mission and experience only 15 aborts. What is the probability of mission success?
24
REFERENCES Benjamin S. Blanchard, Denish Verma, Elmer L. Peterson, Maintainability: A key to effective serviceability and maintenance management, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1995.
25