Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
reveals more about middle class perceptions than about the workers themselves. The
validity of class distinction is never discussed; social change within the existing
problems portrayed. Consequently, Mary Barton and Hard Times are not primarily
“agendas for social change”. They are, instead, commentaries on contemporary issues
inspired by each authors’ social agenda. This essay will mainly identify the social
agendas fuelling Mary Barton and Hard Times. It will then investigate their place in
each novel as a whole and the way in which both offer similar, apolitical, solutions.
The social agendas behind Mary Barton and Hard Times are different, and are
people” defines these concepts. Gradgrind personifies the new authoritarianism that
destroys positive humanity, “a kind of cannon loaded to the muzzle with facts, and
prepared to blow [“the innocents”] clean out of the regions of childhood”. Bitzer is his
determination; “nobody to help for my being here, but myself". Dickens unites these
under his Philosophy of Fact. His exaggerated condemnation echoes the rhetorical
David Jones English II Social Agendas In Mary Barton & Hard Times: Authorial Intention &
Narrative Conflict
little dog's-eared creeds”i. The targets are real, the grandfathers of utilitarianism
condemned in Gradgrind naming some offspring Adam Smith and Malthus. Dickens’
restraintsii.
caused the poor, “doomed to struggle through their lives in strange alternations
between work and want”, to “give some utterance” to a “dumb people” as far as the
“instilling somewhat” upon the reader. The documentary style evokes non-sentimental
sympathy. The interiors of workers’ homes receive long descriptive passages. This is a
world in which people get by on the smallest possible means, “triangular pieces of
glass to save knives and forks from dirtying table-cloths”, bricks for pillows. Book I
gives full insights into working class life; Mary and Margaret stitching, John Barton
attending union meetings, Bible reading on a Sunday. The social agenda is reinforced
by the Marxist ideal of presenting “typical people in typical circumstances”. Job Legh
represents “a class of men” whose scientific obsessions refute prejudices that the
this sentiment:
Gaskell does not however allow her documentary to speak for itself. Not only
2
David Jones English II Social Agendas In Mary Barton & Hard Times: Authorial Intention &
Narrative Conflict
does the novel’s object language centre on “this time of trouble”, its metalanguage
extends to sympathy for workers that often derrides mastersiv. This directly contradicts
several polemical statements, but can be reached by locating a disparity between what
Gaskell preaches and what she portrays. Gaskell initially distances herself from social
agendasv; “Whether the bitter complaints made by [the workers] of the neglect which
they experienced from the prosperous . . . were well-founded or no, it is not for me to
judge”vi. But judge she does, within a few lines she describes this working class view
old intentional fallacy, of employing external clues about an author’s intention, such
as this post-production Preface, rather than the internal realization of that intention in
the language of the text itself. But this disparity does continue in the novel’s
themselves. Gaskell conveys the workers’ point of view in an almost Marxist polemic:
At all times it is a bewildering thing to the poor weaver to see his employer
removing from house to house, each one grander than the last, till he ends in
building one more magnificent than all, or withdraws his money from the
concern . . . while all the time the weaver . . . is struggling on for bread for his
children . . . he would bear and endure much without complaining, could he also
see that his employers were bearing their share; he is, I say, bewildered and (to
use his own word) “aggravated” to see that all goes on just as usual with the
millowners.
She stresses that this is not her opinion: “I know that this is not really the case”. So
why does she portray labour and capital, after the mill fire, in a similar fashion to the
discredited polemic?
The partners had more leisure than they had known for years; and promised
wives and daughters all manner of pleasant excursions . . . It was a pleasant
thing to be able to lounge over breakfast with a review or newspaper in hand; to
have time for becoming acquainted with agreeable and accomplished daughters.
3
David Jones English II Social Agendas In Mary Barton & Hard Times: Authorial Intention &
Narrative Conflict
. . There were happy family evenings, now that the men of business had time for
domestic enjoyments. There is another side to the picture. There were homes
over which Carsons’ fire threw a deep, terrible gloom; the homes of those who
would fain work, and no man gave unto them.
Contrary to the earlier polemic, the employers are not “bearing their share” of
hardships. Working class perceptions are dramatised: “carriages still roll along the
streets, concerts are still crowded by subscribers, the shops for expensive luxuries still
find daily customers”. The discrediting of John Barton’s rhetoric has itself been
discredited. The narrator claims this is “what the workman feels and thinks”, rather
than its own political slant. Yet throughout the novel it is poor at psychologising
concepts out of line with its own ideology. Mary’s woe and love for her father are
described in detail, but there is notably less exposition on her disastrous affection for
Harry Carson. The polemical passages are necessary to prevent the impression that
Gaskell is directly attacking her readership. The events and narration of the novel
reflect mistreatment of the workers to a greater extent the narrator’s explicit thesis that
the workers are misguided. In passing, the Bartons and Wilsons are described as “our
friends”.
narrator, “the foolishest of existing mortals”vii. She does not know “whether [the
opening scene] was on a holiday seized in right of nature and her beautiful spring
time”. The possibly arises that events are independent of her narration; she is merely
recording them. So declarations about the “misapprehension” of the poor are just a
point of view. True authority, the social agenda behind the social commentary, is
omniscient descriptions are replaced with “there runs a tale that . . . ”. We learn most
when characters take over the narrative. Margaret defines Job Legh in her scorpion
4
David Jones English II Social Agendas In Mary Barton & Hard Times: Authorial Intention &
Narrative Conflict
Margaret’s origins. This ties in with Patsy Stoneman’s idea that communication is one
of the novel's key elements. When John Barton is prevented from speaking in London,
the masters are prevented from hearing working class truths in the form that has most
impact, in sayings like “it's the poor, and the poor only, as does such things for the
poor”. Esther is partially empowered – though still condemned by the narrator and
herself – when she is able to shift community doctrine about prostitution into the
only learnt a little less, how infinitely better he might have taught much more!”ix. It
Dickens’ coverage of the industrial theme barely scratches the surface of Gaskell’s
portrait, but this is not his purpose. Industry is, for him, one facet of utilitarian
extending Hard Times' general pattern of imageryxi: “the chimneys, for want of air to
make a draught, were built in an immense variety of stunted and crooked shapes, as
though every house put out a sign of the people likely to have been born in it”. Unlike
Mary Barton with its catalogue of dying friends and infants, Dickens uses
metonymics of death, such as the undertaker’s ladder. He does not describe working
class hardship but alludes to it: “it was a room, not unaquainted with the black
“the Hands”, he fails to portray them as fully-fledged human beings himself. Stephen
5
David Jones English II Social Agendas In Mary Barton & Hard Times: Authorial Intention &
Narrative Conflict
Blackpool barely exists outside industrialisation: “the old sensation upon him which
the stoppage of the machinery always produced - the sensation of its having worked
Both novels describe a polarised society with “hostile classes, with large
appetites and no dinners at one extreme and large dinners and no appetites at the
other”xii. Workers are dehumanised. Masters continue production during slack periods
“to keep the machinery, human and metal, in some kind of order”. Carson is
unashamed that he cannot recognise loyal Davenport: “I don't pretend to know the
names of the men I employ”xiii. The rich are not evil - Carson is sympathetic once
Davenport is individualised - but ignorant. They live outside urban squalor. Stone
Lodge is “situated on a moor within a mile or two of a great town”, Wilson has a two
mile walk to reach the Carson residence. As we see in John Barton's framed narrative
of London, the working classes are also ignorant of upper class culture, but here
differentiation producing infantilised women. Mary endures misery, but proves herself
a fully capable woman. Carson’s daughter, “little Amy with her pretty jokes and her
bird like songs” is indulged by her father until she “can't live without flowers and
scents”. The same infantilisation through middle class ideology is present in Hard
Times, but there is a role reversal between headstrong Louisa and her brother, “the
Whelp”, who is trapped in a childish state. The narrator opines, “It was very strange
that a young gentleman who had never been left to his own guidance for five
disguised as a clown.
6
David Jones English II Social Agendas In Mary Barton & Hard Times: Authorial Intention &
Narrative Conflict
Even so, neither novel challenges the class system. Numerous critics identify
autonomy. Blackpool is noble because “He held no station among the Hands who
could make speeches and carry on debates”. This conviction oddly echoes Bounderby
– the character we despise most – with his conviction that discontent workers want “to
be set up in a coach and six, and to be fed on turtle soup and venison, with a gold
spoon”. Masters are actually community leaders. Stricken workers visit them in both
texts, Wilson during Davenport's illness and Blackpool when trying to divorce his
wife. But these masters do not fulfil their guiding role. Gaskell condemns Carson's
through the eyes of a bedraggled Wilson. Dickens, by contrast, does not condemn his
protagonists for their wealth alone. The only thing remarkable about Stone Lodge’s
wings, lawns and garden are that they resemble their master and his “uncompromising
the law to help me!”. For Dickens increasing disregard for humanity correlates with
His Commons is not a place of Fact but idiocy, yet it imposes utilitarian messengers
. . . the most careful officers ever known, employed by the most liberal
managers ever heard of, assisted by the finest mechanical contrivances ever
devised, the whole in action on the best line ever constructed, had killed five
7
David Jones English II Social Agendas In Mary Barton & Hard Times: Authorial Intention &
Narrative Conflict
The narrator oscillates between farce and tragedy. The “delicate” humour of the
House, “tickled” by the obscene image of a widow’s hat on a dead cow, leads to the
graver observation that the house consequently “became impatient of any serious
reference to the Coroner’s inquest”. The rich cannot appreciate the poor's plight. This
is also reflected when the masters in Mary Barton belittle workers by drawing a
caricature.
the theme that “The one great principle of the English law is to make business for
itself”xiv. This sentiment is echoed in Gaskell’s trial scene. The “life-and-death court”
is a game for Jem’s barrister, motivated “not so much out of earnestness to save the
opportunities for the display of forensic eloquence which were presented by the
facts”. The sailor Will Wilson plays a similar role to Dickens’ circus, a force outside
conventionality that embodies the voice of Truth. His response to the lawyers who
attempt to belittle him with their “garb of unaccustomed words” is a powerful piece of
rhetoric:
“Will you tell the judge and jury how much money you’ve been paid for your
impudence towards one who has told God’s blessed truth and who would scorn
to tell a lie, or blackguard any one, for the biggest fee as ever got for doing a
lawyer’s dirty work?”
power: “Would somebody with a wig on please to ask him how much he can say for
me?” Stoneman claims that by attacking the masculine authority of the court, while
patriarchy itselfxv. This may be true on an abstract level, as Gaskell had no language
8
David Jones English II Social Agendas In Mary Barton & Hard Times: Authorial Intention &
Narrative Conflict
with which she could articulate female emancipationxvi. However, Anna Walter’s claim
that “we are left so often in Gaskell’s work with the impression of what women can
do rather than the reverse” cannot be supported by the diegesis of the text. Jane
as his, and Esther’s attempts to become a lady end in prostitution. If Mary Barton is a
messages.
her adventure in Liverpool, and the murder plotxvii. Mary Barton over-arching
of broader evils. The opprobrious actions of both labour and capital are motivated by
revenge. Religious imagery dominates, Carson’s ultimate amoral deed is his reversal
of the Lord’s prayer. Unlike treatment of the class divide, Gaskell’s polemic and
remaining metalanguage are united here. Religious sanctity is tantamount: “There are
blasphemous actions as well as blasphemous words: all unloving, cruel deeds, are
acted blasphemy”. Stoneman points out that “political activism in both men and
women stems from thwarted parental love”. A middle class woman with a middle
class readership, she cannot discuss labour without commenting on her own class.
metaphor for the social bond. She thus avoids presenting an “agenda for social
change”.
Despite negative critical focus of the romance element, it does in some ways
9
David Jones English II Social Agendas In Mary Barton & Hard Times: Authorial Intention &
Narrative Conflict
contemplating “how deep might be the romance in the lives of some of those who
elbow me daily in the busy streets of the town in which I resided”. The murder plot
places the tragedy of the working class – the death of one's children – into the realm
of the middle class, increasing the sympathy of Gaskell's readership: “Rich and poor,
masters and men, were then brothers in the deep suffering of the heart”. More often,
however, it leads to conflicts in the narrative. Margaret and Mary's conversation while
stitching the Odgen funeral dresses is a true insight into working class domesticity,
but shifts awkwardly mid-chapter to the suspense-based dramatics of the fire at the
Mary, as heroin, embodies this conflict. She is the correct eponym for the
novelxviii. Her father is the antithesis of a hero, a generalisation. Yet problems arise, for
while Gaskell utilises a typical romance mode, the unconventional setting renders
conventional heroism impossible. Mary is impetuous and dynamic, but can never be a
“one would think you were the first girl that ever had a lover; have you never heard
Utilitarianism and political economy are rarely described directly but inferred. The
narrator defines the broader purpose of his industrial theme: “Is it possible, I wonder,
that there was an analogy between the case of the Coketown children and the case of
the little Gradgrinds?” Industrialisation is one facet of the damage caused by the
10
David Jones English II Social Agendas In Mary Barton & Hard Times: Authorial Intention &
Narrative Conflict
philosophy of Fact. The main interest is in its legacy upon the middle class
protagonists.
Both novels provide apolitical solutions to the problems portrayed xix. These
problems are explicit and detailed, but their solutions are abstract. One is the
importance of nurture and the family. In Mary Barton children are the most important
part of most characters’ lives, across the social spectrum. John Barton's son is “the
cynosure of all his strong power of love”, Carson declares “Have not I toiled and
struggled even to these years with hopes in my heart that all centred in my boy?” John
Barton and Jane Wilson are reluctant to give up their children, even once they are
grown. Bounderby’s false denial of nurture: “my grandmother was the wickedest and
the worst old woman that ever lived”, extends his catalogue of faults. Nurture extends
beyond the family bond however, through the unconventional relationships identified
Mary “little knows the pleasure o’ helping others” before Alice’s maternal care. Sissy
may be a “cuckoo”xxi in the Gradgrind household, but her anti-utilitarian good humour
highlights for Gradgrind the failings of his system, whilst prompting Louisa’s
emotional development.
The other solution is nostalgic, the representation of a rural idyll, that “speaks
of other times and other occupations”. Alice Wilson romanticises past rural
Louisa and Sissy go into the country where “the great wheel of earth
Though the scars of industrialisation are all too clearly felt, they are
11
David Jones English II Social Agendas In Mary Barton & Hard Times: Authorial Intention &
Narrative Conflict
there were trees to see and there were larks singing . . . and
there were pleasant scents in the air, and all was over-arched
by a bright blue sky . . . In another distance hills began to rise ;
in a third, there was a faint change in the light of the horizon
where it shone upon the far-off sea. Under their feet, the grass
was free ; beautiful shadows of branches flickered upon it, and
speckled it; hedgerows were luxuriant; everything was at
peace.
with the Green Heys Field excursion and closes with the protagonists
New World economy provides a new start for the working man, on a
romanticisation:
Mr. Southey has found a way . . . in which the effects of manufactures and
agriculture may be compared. And what is this way? To stand on a hill, to look
at a cottage and a factory, and to see which is the prettier. Does Mr. Southey
think that the body of the English peasantry live, or ever lived, in substantial or
ornamented cottages, with boxhedges, gardens, beehives and orchards?xxii
In conclusion, Mary Barton and Hard Times are commentaries on social issues
that do not prescribe social change. Gaskell’s portrait of the working class is expanded
into a Christian morality tale, while Dickens manipulates his depiction of society to
blatantly reflect the evils of utilitarianism and political economy. Though Mary
Barton draws a more realistic portrait of society than Dickens’ dramatised philosophy,
12
David Jones English II Social Agendas In Mary Barton & Hard Times: Authorial Intention &
Narrative Conflict
13
Bibliography:
Carlyle, Thomas “Captains Of Industry” in Abrams, M.H. & Greenblatt, S. ed. The
Norton Anthology of English Literature: Seventh Edition: Volume 2
USA: Norton, 1999