Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Calibration of VISSIM
14th ptv vision User Group Meeting
Martin Fellendorf
Workflow Simulation
detailed operation with system performance ranking 2nd VISSIM model from scratch: definition of network topology based on arials/CAD definition of routes and/or DTA with multiple ODs calibration of VISSIM parameters and input data > Application: detailed feasibility studies and traffic operations
Calibration general Motorways Mixed traffic Urban Summary 3
Workflow Simulation
Statistics used for calibration > GEH index (UK) to test observed vs simulated link volumes
> Route Mean Square (RMS) to test flow rate / discharge rate
Summary
Calibration of VISSIM
Traffic volumes: important parameters > Total link and turning volumes > Path flows match Origin-Destination pairs and trip length distribution > Distribution of vehicles types (Composition) Vehicle and driver types: > Technical abilities of vehicles (check trucks, buses, trams) > Associate driver behaviour via link types and vehicle classes > Desired speed distribution per link and vehicle type > Mean value (max throughput at 60 90 km/h) > Increase capacity by decreasing variability of desired speed Network > Type of signalization > Gap times at unsignalized intersections (priority rules) > Visibility distance (Lane change at connectors)
Workflow Simulation Calibration general Motorways Mixed traffic Urban Summary 7
Network calibration: visibility distance > Connectors Lane Change = visibility > Visibility of connector 3 than 500m > Problem for CarPurple as visibility < 500m
500 m
1 2
Workflow Simulation Calibration general Motorways Mixed traffic Urban Summary
3
8
VISSIM 3.70 2 lane motorway only left lane investigated 5% trucks (non-overtaking) DesSpeed Car 110-140 km/h SimDuration 3*4500s VolumeIncrease every 300s by 200 veh/h All CC default motorway except: CC1: 0,9s Following distance CC7: 0,4 m/s OscillationAccel. CC1: 1,5s Following distance CC7: 0,2 m/s OscillationAccel
Workflow Simulation
Calibration general
Motorways
Mixed traffic
Urban
Summary
Awareness on motorways
Typical values: Duration: 1s 4s Probability: 1% - 3% (%: wrong unit for probability in 4.00)
Workflow Simulation
Calibration general
Motorways
Mixed traffic
Urban
Summary
10
Workflow Simulation
Calibration general
Motorways
Mixed traffic
Urban
Summary
11
Workflow Simulation
Calibration general
Motorways
Mixed traffic
Urban
Summary
12
Gradients on motorway
Brilon; Breler: Traffic Flow on Freeway Upgrades, TRB 2004
> Study conducted for the HBS > > > >
(German HCM) by Ruhr University Field measurements at 5 sections of German Motorways VISSIM was enhanced by gradient dependent acceleration Simulated data fits field measurements Example: A8, 2 lanes, grade 5.6%, speed limit 100 km/h, no truck passing, truck rate 17%
Workflow Simulation
Calibration general
Motorways
Mixed traffic
Urban
Summary
13
Workflow Simulation
Calibration general
Motorways
Mixed traffic
Urban
Summary
14
Calibration and mixed traffic > Vehicle position within lane and observation of adjacent lanes
-> validation and calibration > Lateral distance between vehicles as function of speed difference -> calibration > More experience needed in countries with little lane discipline
Workflow Simulation
Calibration general
Motorways
Mixed traffic
Urban
Summary
16
HCQS compared in 2002 results of various microsimulators with HCM results > Each developer received artificial but realistic input data and performed simulation for base and future case > Developer calibrated his own model > HCQS members standarized and compared results
Workflow Simulation Calibration general Motorways Mixed traffic Urban Summary 17
Comparison of Simulation and HCM Problem in task description > Link counts given > O/D unknown > Assumption on paths > Results like VMT or VHT depend on paths flows Results of Comparison > 13% diff of speeds in base year but 69% for future > Calibration is important > Diff. in congestion modeling > Diff. assumption on O/Ds -> same as in real world
..\Examples\Training\HCM2002 ??
Workflow Simulation Calibration general Motorways Mixed traffic Urban Summary 18
Look-ahead distance for blue left turning vehicles Look-ahead distance for green left turning vehicles
Workflow Simulation
Calibration general
Motorways
Mixed traffic
Urban
Summary
19
[496: 1.74]
Calibration general
Motorways
Mixed traffic
Urban
Summary
20
References
Material borrowed without mentioning source at all ocurrences > Dowling Associates; Cambridge Systematics: Volume III Guidelines for Applying Traffic Microsimulation Modeling Software; prepared for FHWA, August 2003 www.ptvamerica.com/library Further references > Bloomberg, L.; Swenson, M.; Haldors, B.: Comparison of Simulation Models and the Highway Capacity Manual, Preprint, Annual Meeting Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003. > Brilon, W.; Breler, A.: Traffic Flow on Freeway Upgrades. Preprint 042953, Annual Meeting Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004. > Gomes, G.; May, A.; Horowitz, R.: A Microsimulation Model of a Congested Freeway using VISSIM. Preprint, Annual Meeting Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004. www.ptvamerica.com/library > Department of Transport: Highway Agency, Manual for Roads & Bridges, Volume 12, London 1996
www.official-documents.co.uk/document/deps/ha/dmrb/vol12/index.htm
Workflow Simulation Calibration general Motorways Mixed traffic Urban Summary 21
22