Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 5

Color profile: Disabled

Composite Default screen

650

NOTE / NOTE

Attempts to inhibit ruminal methanogenesis by


blocking pyruvate oxidative decarboxylation
E.M. Ungerfeld, S.R. Rust, and R. Burnett

Abstract: The inhibition of pyruvate oxidative decarboxylation as a means of decreasing ruminal methanogenesis
in vitro was studied. In the first experiment, the addition of adenosine and adenine (with and without ribose) to
ruminal batch cultures did not decrease methanogenesis. In the second experiment, the addition of oxythiamin de-
creased methanogenesis by 23%. In the third experiment, three pyruvate derivatives did not inhibit methanogenesis,
although hydroxypyruvate improved organic matter fermentation from 57.8% to 64.2%. The additives did not seem to
inhibit pyruvate oxidative decarboxylation.

Key words: methane, inhibition, rumen, pyruvate decarboxylation, thiamin.


Résumé : Nous avons étudié l’inhibition de la décarboxylation oxydative du pyruvate comme moyen de réduire la
méthanogénèse ruminale in vitro. Dans la première expérience, l’ajout d’adénosine et d’adénine, avec ou sans ribose, à
des cultures ruminales en discontinu n’a pas diminué la méthanogénèse. Dans la seconde expérience, l’ajout d’oxythia-
mine a diminué la méthanogénèse de 23 %. Dans la troisième expérience, trois dérivés du pyruvate n’ont pu inhiber la
méthanogénèse, bien que l’hydroxypyruvate a amélioré la fermentation des matières organiques de 57,8 % à 64,2 %.
Les additifs n’ont vraisemblablement pas inhibé la décarboxylation oxydative du pyruvate.
Mots clés : méthane, inhibition, rumen, décarboxylation du pyruvate, thiamine.

[Traduit par la Rédaction] Ungerfeld et al. 654

Methane production by ruminants is a source of carbon and cordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory
energy loss and contributes to global warming. The inhibition Animals (National Institute of Health 1996).
of CH4 production in the rumen would have significant eco- Adenine and adenosine impaired thiamin synthesis in Esch-
nomic and environmental benefits (Nagaraja et al. 1997). erichia coli (Iwashima et al. 1968) by lowering the hydroxy-
Pyruvate oxidative decarboxylation is the first step in the methylpyrimidine moiety synthesis (Kawasaki et al. 1969).
conversion of pyruvate to acetate and to butyrate in the The effects of adenine and adenosine on CH4 production and
rumen and produces CO2, H2, and formate, the precursors on fermentation by ruminal batch cultures were evaluated.
for CH4 formation (Russell and Wallace 1997). As thiamin The effects of adenosine’s ribose moiety alone or with ade-
pyrophosphate is a cofactor of pyruvate oxidoreductases nine were also studied. Ruminal fluid was collected after the
(Williams et al. 1990), it was hypothesized that the inhibi- morning feeding from two nonlactating Holstein cows fed
tion of thiamin utilization by ruminal microorganisms could alfalfa hay, strained through a double cheesecloth and
block pyruvate oxidative decarboxylation, decreasing the blended. One part of ruminal fluid was mixed with four parts
availability of precursors for methanogenesis and diverting of Goering and Van Soest (1975) buffer. Three samples of
pyruvate into propionate formation. the mixture were taken for subsequent determination of vol-
atile fatty acids (VFA) initial contents. Fifty millilitres of the
Experiment 1: inhibition of thiamin synthesis mixture was anaerobically delivered into 125-mL Wheaton
bottles. Each bottle had 600 mg of ground (0.2 mm screen)
All the studies herein presented were approved by the
alfalfa hay (1.8% nitrogen, dry matter basis) as substrate,
Michigan State University All-University Committee on An-
and adenine (Sigma A 8626; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis,
imal Use and Care (Animal Use Form 03/02-043-00), in ac-
Mo.), ribose (Sigma R 7500), adenine + ribose, or adenosine
(Sigma A 9251) was added as a solid to achieve 10 mmol/L
Received 7 April 2003. Revision received 15 September 2003. final concentration for each of the compounds. Control bot-
Accepted 19 September 2003. Published on the NRC Research
tles had no added chemical. The bottles were sealed under
Press Web site at http://cjm.nrc.ca on 28 November 2003.
an O2-free CO2 atmosphere and incubated in a shaking water
E.M. Ungerfeld, S.R. Rust,1 and R. Burnett. Department of bath at 39 °C for 24 h. Fermentation was terminated by in-
Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI jecting 3 mL of 12 mol/L H2SO4 into each bottle.
48824, U.S.A.
Gas composition (CH4 and CO2) was analysed as de-
1
Corresponding author (e-mail: rust@msu.edu). scribed by Callaway and Martin (1996), with a flame ioniza-
Can. J. Microbiol. 49: 650–654 (2003) doi: 10.1139/W03-079 © 2003 NRC Canada

I:\cjm\cjm4910\W03-079.vp
November 21, 2003 10:21:51 AM
Color profile: Disabled
Composite Default screen

Ungerfeld et al. 651

tion detector gas chromatograph (Gow Mac Instruments Co., found that 62% of added adenine (approximately
Bridgewater, N.J.) equipped with a 122 cm × 0.6 cm DC 1.2 mmol/L) was degraded after 4 h of incubation in ruminal
200 column (150 °C, carrier gas was N2 at 820 kPa). Gas fluid. Hypoxanthine and xanthine accounted for 33% and
production was expressed as micromoles at 25 °C and 1 atm 7%, respectively, of the adenine initially present. All the
(1 atm = 101.325 kPa). A 5-mL aliquot of the fermentation added adenosine (approximately 1.2 mmol/L) was degraded
medium was centrifuged (26 000g, 4 °C, 30 min). Volatile within 1 h, and 78% of its initial concentration was recov-
fatty acids, lactate, formate, and ethanol were quantified by ered as inosine, which was in turn converted to hypoxan-
differential refractometry with a Waters 712 Wisp HPLC thine. Therefore, and in agreement with the present
(Waters Associates Inc., Milford, Mass.) equipped with a observations, deamination seemed to proceed faster when
BioRad HPX 87H column (BioRad Laboratories, Hercules, the ribose moiety was present.
Calif.). The solvent was 0.005 mol/L H2SO4 at 0.6 mL/min. Hydrogen (H) recovery was low in all treatments. This
Column temperature was 65 °C. Sample injection volume may be partly accounted for by H sinks that were not mea-
was 15 µL. Ammonia was analysed as described by Chaney sured, like sulfate and nitrate reductions (Stewart et al. 1997)
and Marbach (1962). and fatty acids biohydrogenation and synthesis (Czerkawski
Apparently fermented organic matter (FOM) was esti- 1986).
mated from VFA production (Marty and Demeyer 1973), but
using isobutyrate instead of caproate. Initial VFA contents
were subtracted, and VFA production expressed in micro- Experiment 2: inhibition of thiamin uptake
moles. Hydrogen balance were calculated as done by Unger- and utilization
feld et al. (2003).
Thiamin structural analogues can inhibit bacterial growth
Four replicates per treatment were used. The experimental (Koser 1968) and hinder thiamin uptake in protozoa (Shi-
model was as follows: response = overall mean + treat- geoka et al. 1987). In a second experiment, the effects of
ment + residual. Data were tested for homogeneity of vari- thiamin structural analogues amprolium and oxythiamin on
ances (Modified Levene’s test, Neter et al. 1995) and CH4 production and fermentation by ruminal batch cultures
analysed as a one-way ANOVA. If homogeneity of variances were evaluated. Ruminal fluid was prepared and incubated
was rejected (P < 0.05), a Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test as described above, but collected prior to the morning feed-
(Neter et al. 1995) was conducted. Planned contrasts of in- ing. Each Wheaton bottle had 200 mg of alfalfa hay. One
terest were (i) control vs. adenine, (ii) control vs. adenosine, millilitre of aqueous solutions of amprolium (Sigma A 0542)
(iii) adenine vs. adenosine, (iv) ribose vs. adenosine, and or oxythiamin (Sigma O 4000) was added to achieve final
(v) adenine + ribose vs. adenosine. A Bonferroni adjustment concentrations of 5 or 10 mmol/L. Controls received 1 mL
(Neter et al. 1995) for five nonorthogonal comparisons was of deionized water. Fermentation was terminated by inject-
used, and significance declared at P < 0.01 (for an experi- ing 1 mL of a 10% phenol solution instead of H2SO4, as in
ment-wise type I error probability of 0.05). All other com- the previous experiment, so that the final pH could be mea-
parisons were done by the Scheffé test (Neter et al. 1995). sured (Digital Benchtop pH meter, Cole-Parmer Instrument
Adenine, with or without ribose, did not affect CH4 pro- Company, Vernon Hills, Ill.). Total gas production was mea-
duction (Table 1). The addition of ribose or adenosine alone sured, and gas composition analysed as before. Dihydrogen
tended to increase (P = 0.03 and P = 0.07, respectively, was also analysed (RGD2 Reduction Gas Detector, Trace
Scheffé test) methanogenesis. However, when CH4 output Analytical, Menlo Park, Calif.). Analysis of VFA and NH +4
was related to the amount of organic matter apparently fer- and the calculation of FOM were done as above. The num-
mented, there were no differences among treatments (not ber of replicates and the statistical model and analyses were
shown). the same as in Experiment 1. Orthogonal polynomial con-
The addition of ribose, either pure (control vs. ribose, and trasts for linear and quadratic trends were tested (Neter et al.
adenine vs. adenine + ribose) or as part of the adenosine 1995).
molecule (adenine vs. adenosine), always promoted (P < Methane production was decreased (P < 0.05) by 23% and
0.05) FOM (Table 1). On the contrary, adenine was inhibi- 8% by oxythiamin and amprolium at 5 mmol/L, respectively
tory for fermentation. The addition of ribose, alone (control (Table 2). Increasing the concentrations to 10 mmol/L
vs. adenine + ribose, P = 0.69, Scheffé test) or as the ribose further decreased methanogenesis by only 2% and 3% for
moiety in adenosine (control vs. adenosine, P = 0.58), re- oxythiamin and amprolium, respectively. The effects of am-
lieved the inhibition caused by adenine. If, as hypothesized, prolium on CH4 production were due to less fermentation, as
adenine caused an inhibition of thiamin synthesis, the reac- CH4 production per micromole of FOM did not change (not
tions of the pentose phosphate pathway catalyzed by trans- shown). Although oxythiamin addition decreased (P < 0.05)
ketolase could have been affected. However, this should not fermentation, CH4 output per micromole of FOM was de-
affect the supply of ribose, as ribose phosphate is a substrate creased (P < 0.01) by 17% at 5 and 10 mmol/L oxythiamin.
rather than a product of these reactions (Voet and Voet Oxythiamin and amprolium could have inhibited fermenta-
1995). Therefore, the relief of adenine’s fermentation inhibi- tion by affecting processes other than pyruvate oxidative
tion by ribose would have been due to the use of the latter as decarboxylation, like the pentose phosphate pathway (Voet
an energy source. and Voet 1995) or valine synthesis (McDonald et al. 1995).
The addition of adenine, with (P = 0.02) or without ribose The catabolism of some amino acids could also be affected
(P < 0.01), and adenosine (P < 0.01) increased NH +4 concen- by blocking oxidative decarboxylations (Voet and Voet
tration; however, NH +4 was higher (P < 0.01) with adenosine 1995); this may explain the decrease in NH +4 concentration
than with adenine (Table 1). McAllan and Smith (1973) observed. Oxythiamin decreased (P < 0.01) acetate and bu-
© 2003 NRC Canada

I:\cjm\cjm4910\W03-079.vp
November 21, 2003 10:21:52 AM
Color profile: Disabled
Composite Default screen

652 Can. J. Microbiol. Vol. 49, 2003

Table 1. Effects of adenine, adenosine, and ribose on end products of ruminal in vitro fermentation (Experiment 1).
Significant
(P < 0.01)
Adenine + planned
Control Adenine Ribose ribose Adenosine SEM P contrastsa
FOM (%) 52.8 46.6 58.8 51.2 53.3 0.72 <0.01 1, 3, 4
CH4 (µmol) 513 454 668 585 594 29.1 <0.01b 3
CO2 (µmol) 2302 2243 2477 2432 2443 36.0 <0.01b 3
Total VFA (mmol/L) 87.3 86.3 103 100 102 0.47 <0.01 2, 3
Acetate (µmol) 2274 2281 2834 2736 2756 35.4 <0.01 2, 3
Propionate (µmol) 706 633 828 818 842 10.5 <0.01 1, 2, 3
Butyrate (µmol) 223 208 320 296 307 8.80 <0.01 2, 3
Acetate (molar %) 69.1 70.3 68.9 68.8 67.9 0.13 <0.01 1, 2, 3, 4
Propionate (molar %) 21.5 19.5 20.1 20.6 20.8 0.16 <0.01 1
Butyrate (molar %) 6.8 6.4 7.8 7.4 7.6 0.08 <0.01 2, 3
NH +4 (mg/dL) 38.9 52.8 33.9 48.7 62.5 1.67 <0.01 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
H produced (µmol) reducing 6457 6524 8098 7944 8240 57.2 <0.01 2, 3
equivalents pairs
H incorporated (µmol) reducing 4084 3717 5220 4807 4964 61.8 <0.01b 2, 3
equivalents pairs
H recovery (%) 63.2 57.0 64.5 60.5 60.3 0.86 0.05 None
Note: FOM, apparently fermented organic matter; VFA, volatile fatty acids.
a
1, control vs. adenine; 2, control vs. adenosine; 3, adenine vs. adenosine; 4, ribose vs. adenosine; 5, adenine + ribose vs. adenosine.
b
The Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test was performed because of heterogeneity of variances (Levene test on absolute deviations P < 0.05).

Table 2. Effect of thiamin structural analogues on ruminal in vitro fermentation (Experiment 2).
Oxy Amp
Control 5 mmol/L 10 mmol/L 5 mmol/L 10 mmol/L SEM P Relationshipa
FOM (%) 56.7 53.2 51.5 51.4 48.2 1.50 0.02 1, 3
CH4 (µmol) 315 244 239 289 279 5.8 <0.01 1, 2, 3
CO2 (µmol) 646 647 643 674 705 30.7 0.58b None
H2 (µmol) 0.43 0.46 0.49 0.60 0.48 0.07 0.58 None
Total VFA (mmol/L) 48.9 47.7 47.1 46.9 45.8 0.28 0.02b 1, 3
Acetate (µmol) 814 713 697 744 724 20.3 <0.01b 1, 3
Propionate (µmol) 298 353 348 280 251 5.3 <0.01 1, 2, 3
Butyrate (µmol) 74.3 58.8 56.6 61.3 55.6 3.66 <0.01 1, 2, 3
Acetate (molar %) 67.8 62.7 62.8 67.9 69.8 0.12 <0.01 1, 2, 3, 4
Propionate (molar %) 24.9 31.0 31.4 25.7 24.3 0.21 <0.01 1, 2, 4
Butyrate (molar %) 6.2 5.2 5.1 5.6 5.4 0.11 0.02 1, 3
pH 7.3 7.2 7.1 7.2 7.2 0.07 0.18 1
NH +4 (mg/dL) 30.7 27.9 24.8 29.3 28.2 0.60 <0.01 1, 3
H produced (µmol) reducing 2511 2305 2214 2303 2199 32.4 0.02 1, 3
equivalents pairs
H incorporated (µmol) reducing 2024 1870 1820 1891 1789 23.6 0.02 1, 3
equivalents pairs
H recovery (%) 80.7 81.1 82.2 82.6 81.3 1.02 0.95 None
Note: Oxy, oxythiamin; Amp, amprolium; FOM, apparently fermented organic matter; VFA, volatile fatty acids.
a
1, significant (P < 0.05) linear relationship for oxythiamin; 2, significant (P < 0.05) quadratic relationship for oxythiamin; 3, significant (P < 0.05) lin-
ear relationship for amprolium; 4, significant (P < 0.05) quadratic relationship for amprolium.
b
The Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test was done because of heterogeneity of variances (Levene test on absolute deviations P < 0.05).

tyrate production and increased (P < 0.01) propionate. This trons spared from methanogenesis were relocated into propi-
would be expected if pyruvate oxidative decarboxylation onate production.
was inhibited; however, an increase in propionate production Amprolium increased (P < 0.05) acetate and decreased
is a general consequence of inhibiting methanogenesis butyrate (P < 0.05) molar percentages (Table 2). Horton and
(Nagaraja et al. 1997). The changes observed in the VFA Stockdale (1979) found that amprolium decreased propio-
profile may result from the inhibition of methanogenesis nate molar percentage without affecting other VFA. Heit-
rather than the latter been caused by changes in the fermen- mann and Yehya Taka (1970–1971) reported a decrease in
tation pattern. Dihydrogen did not accumulate, and the elec- propionate and an increase in butyrate when amprolium was

© 2003 NRC Canada

I:\cjm\cjm4910\W03-079.vp
November 21, 2003 10:21:52 AM
Color profile: Disabled
Composite Default screen

Ungerfeld et al. 653

Table 3. Effect of pyruvate derivatives on end products of in vitro ruminal fermentation (Experiment 3).
Significant
(P < 0.0083)
planned
Control Pyruvate Bromopyruvate Fluoropyruvate Hydroxypyruvate SEM P contrastsa
FOM (%) 57.8 58.8 56.5 55.4 64.2 5.29 0.01b 5, 6
CH4 (µmol) 467 457 423 423 453 31.4 0.20 None
CO2 (µmol) 1041 1054 1019 1090 1080 156 0.60b None
H2 (µmol) 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.4 0.065 <0.01 4, 6
Total VFA (mmol/L) 51.0 52.9 51.4 50.9 55.2 0.25 0.01b 5, 6
Acetate (µmol) 1244 1329 1260 1249 1336 17.7 0.02b 1, 5, 6
Propionate (µmol) 335 350 334 338 382 5.5 <0.01 5, 6
Butyrate (µmol) 136 135 135 127 194 0.27 0.04b 5, 6
Acetate (molar %) 70.0 70.9 70.2 70.6 67.0 0.09 <0.01 1, 2, 3, 5, 6
Propionate (molar %) 18.9 18.7 18.6 19.1 19.2 0.17 0.69 None
Butyrate (molar %) 7.6 7.2 7.5 7.2 9.8 0.14 <0.01 None
pH 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.7 0.29 0.51 None
NH +4 (mg/dL) 15.1 16.9 16.2 16.1 15.5 0.23 0.10b None
H produced (µmol) reducing 3532 3728 3584 3523 4038 32.5 0.01b 5, 6
equivalents pairs
H incorporated (µmol) 2903 2886 2738 2719 3101 36.3 0.01 5, 6
reducing equivalents pairs
H recovery (%) 82.2 77.4 76.4 77.3 76.8 0.94 0.20 None
Note: FOM, apparently fermented organic matter; VFA, volatile fatty acids.
a
1, control vs. pyruvate; 2, control vs. average pyruvate derivatives; 3, pyruvate vs. average pyruvate derivatives; 4, bromopyruvate vs. Na-
fluoropyruvate; 5, bromopyruvate vs. hydroxypyruvate; 6, Na-fluoropyruvate vs. hydroxypyruvate.
b
The Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test was performed because of heterogeneity of variances (Levene test on absolute deviations P < 0.05).

added to ruminal continuous cultures. Their results and the were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography
present ones would be contrary to the hypothesis that (HPLC) along with the concentration of VFA. Substrate ap-
amprolium would impair thiamin utilization, resulting in parently fermented was calculated by subtracting the amount
pyruvate being diverted from acetate and butyrate formation of additive disappeared from FOM.
towards propionate production. The number of replicates, the model used, and the statisti-
Final pH values slightly above 7 (Table 2) would be a cal analyses were the same as above. Planned contrasts of
consequence of the low VFA concentration, due to the low interest were (i) control vs. sodium pyruvate, (ii) control vs.
amount of substrate used, and of the loss of dissolved CO2 average of pyruvate derivatives, (iii) sodium pyruvate vs.
after the bottles were opened. average pyruvate derivatives, (iv) bromopyruvate vs. sodium
fluoropyruvate, (v) bromopyruvate vs. hydroxypyruvate,
(vi) sodium fluoropyruvate vs. hydroxypyruvate. A Bon-
Experiment 3: direct inhibition of pyruvate ferroni adjustment (Neter et al. 1995) for six nonorthogonal
oxidoreductases comparisons was used, so significance was declared at P <
In a third experiment, the direct inhibition of pyruvate 0.0083 (for an experiment-wise type I error probability of
oxidoreductases through the use of pyruvate derivatives, as 0.05). All other comparisons were done by the Scheffé test.
shown by Flournoy and Frey (1989) and Williams et al. None of the additives had any effect on CH4 production or
(1990) with purified components reactions, was attempted. CO2 release (Table 3). Disappearance of all four additives
The effects of the pyruvate derivatives bromopyruvate, fluo- was complete (not shown). As the VFA molar percentages
ropyruvate, and hydroxypyruvate on CH4 production and were the same with bromopyruvate or fluoropyruvate as with
fermentation were evaluated. Ruminal fluid was collected, pyruvate (P > 0.05, Scheffé test; not shown), it is possible
prepared, and incubated as in Experiment 2. Wheaton bottles that these derivatives were dehalogenated, converted into
contained 300 mg of alfalfa hay each. One millilitre of bro- pyruvate, and metabolized to VFA. Hydroxypyruvate, how-
mopyruvate (Sigma B 9630), sodium fluoropyruvate (Sigma ever, shifted (P < 0.05) the VFA molar proportions towards
F 4004), and hydroxypyruvate (Sigma H 9270) aqueous butyrate at the expense of acetate, which may indicate that
solutions were added to Wheaton bottles to achieve final this additive was also catabolized by an alternative pathway.
concentrations of 2 mmol/L. Controls received 1 mL of Interestingly, hydroxypyruvate increased total FOM (sub-
deionized water. Sodium pyruvate (Sigma P 2256) at strate + additive) from 57.8% to 64.2% (P < 0.01; Table 3),
2 mmol/L was also included as a positive control. Fermenta- and the alfalfa substrate apparent fermentation from 57.8%
tion was terminated by injecting 1 mL of a 10% phenol solu- to 63.2% (P = 0.02; not shown).
tion. Total gas production and composition, VFA production The pyruvate derivatives did not inhibit CH4 production
and NH +4 concentration, and the calculation of FOM were and, except for hydroxypyruvate, did not alter the VFA pro-
done as described above. The additives’ final concentrations file. This indicates that they probably did not inhibit pyru-

© 2003 NRC Canada

I:\cjm\cjm4910\W03-079.vp
November 21, 2003 10:21:52 AM
Color profile: Disabled
Composite Default screen

654 Can. J. Microbiol. Vol. 49, 2003

vate oxidoreductases, as was hypothesized. As they were metabolism of lambs with coccidiosis. Am. J. Vet. Res. 40:
totally metabolized, they must have been taken up by ru- 967–970.
minal microorganisms. They might have been metabolized Iwashima, A., Kawasaki, T., Nakamura, M., and Nose, Y. 1968.
before they could inhibit pyruvate oxidoreductases, or the Effect of amino acids and purine bases on thiamin synthesis by
structures of ruminal pyruvate oxidoreductases could be dif- Escherichia coli. J. Vitaminol. (Kyoto), 14: 203–210.
ferent from the ones these compounds were previously re- Kawasaki, T., Iwashima, A., and Nose, Y. 1969. Regulation of thia-
ported to inhibit. min biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. J. Biochem. 65: 407–416.
Koser, S.A. 1968. Vitamin requirements of bacteria and yeasts.
In conclusion, oxythiamin was the only additive that
Charles C. Thomas Publishers, Springfield, Ill., U.S.A.
achieved some inhibition of methanogenesis, although it also
Marty, R.J., and Demeyer, D.I. 1973. The effect of inhibitors of
decreased fermentation. It seems that pyruvate oxidative methane production on fermentation pattern and stoichiometry
decarboxylation could not be inhibited, either directly or in vitro using rumen contents from sheep given molasses. Br. J.
through the inhibition of thiamin utilization. Because of a Nutr. 30: 369–376.
lack of direct measurements on thiamin metabolism, it is not McAllan, A.B., and Smith, R.H. 1973. Degradation of nucleic acid
know if the additives in Experiments 1 and 2 were taken up derivatives by rumen bacteria in vitro. Br. J. Nutr. 29: 467–474.
by ruminal microorganisms and, if they were, why the intra- McDonald, P., Edwards, R.A., Greenhalgh, J.F.D., and Morgan,
cellular effects hypothesized did not occur. An antimethano- C.A. 1995. Animal nutrition. Longman Group Ltd., Harlow,
genic strategy based on the use of oxythiamin would require Essex, U.K.
the delivery of ruminal-protected thiamin together with oxy- Nagaraja, T.G., Newbold, C.J., Van Nevel, C.J., and Demeyer, D.I.
thiamin to avoid potential toxic effects of the latter on the 1997. Manipulation of ruminal fermentation. In The rumen mi-
host animal. Future work in this line would need basic re- crobial ecosystem. Edited by P.N. Hobson and C.S. Stewart.
search on thiamin uptake, synthesis, and utilization and on Blackie Academic & Professional, London. p. 523.
the enzymology of pyruvate oxidoreductases of different National Institute of Health. 1996. Guide for the care and use of
ruminal microorganisms. laboratory animals. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
Neter, J., Kutner, M.H., Naschsheim, C.J., and Wasserman, W.
1995. Applied linear statistical models. 4th ed. McGraw–Hill,
References Boston, Mass., U.S.A.
Russell, J.B., and Wallace, R.J. 1997. Energy-yielding and energy-
Callaway, T.R., and Martin, S.A. 1996. Effects of organic acid and consuming reactions. In The rumen microbial ecosystem. Edited
monensin treatment on in vitro mixed ruminal microorganism by P.N. Hobson and C.S. Stewart. Blackie Academic & Profes-
fermentation of cracked corn. J. Anim. Sci. 74: 1982–1989. sional, London. pp. 246.
Chaney, A.L., and Marbach, E.P. 1962. Modified reagents for de- Shigeoka, S., Onishi, T., Maeda, K., Nakano, Y., and Kitaoka, S.
termination of urea and ammonia. Clin. Chem. 8: 130–132. 1987. Thiamin uptake in Euglena gracilis. Biochem. Biophys.
Czerkawski, J.W. 1986. An introduction to rumen studies. Per- Acta, 929: 247–252.
gamon Press Ltd., Oxford, U.K. Stewart, C.S., Flint, H.J., and Bryant, M.P. 1997. The rumen bacte-
Flournoy, D.S., and Frey, P.A. 1989. Inactivation of the pyruvate ria. In The rumen microbial ecosystem. Edited by P.N. Hobson
dehydrogenase complex of Escherichia coli by fluoropyruvate. and C.S. Stewart. Blackie Academic & Professional, London.
Biochemistry, 28: 9594–9602. pp. 10.
Goering, H.K., and Van Soest, P.J. 1975. Forage fiber analyses (ap- Ungerfeld, E.M., Rust, S.R., and Burnett, R. 2003. Use of some
paratus, reagents, procedures and some applications). Agricul- novel alternative electron sinks to inhibit ruminal methano-
ture Handbook No. 379. Agricultural Research Services (ARS), genesis. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 43: 189–202.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Washington, Voet, D., and Voet, J.G. 1995. Biochemistry. John Wiley and Sons,
D.C. Inc., New York.
Heitmann, R.N., and Yehya Taka, M.R. 1970–1971. An in vitro Williams, K.P., Leadlay, P.F., and Lowe, P.N. 1990. Inhibition of
study of the effects of amprolium in the rumen. Mesopotamia J. pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase from Trichomonas vaginalis
Agric. 5, 6: 32–40. by pyruvate and its analogues. Comparison with the pyruvate
Horton, G.M.H., and Stockdale, P.H.G. 1979. Effects of amprolium decarboxylase component of the pyruvate dehydrogenase com-
and monensin on oocyst discharge, feed utilization, and ruminal plex. Biochem. J. 268: 69–75.

© 2003 NRC Canada

I:\cjm\cjm4910\W03-079.vp
November 21, 2003 10:21:52 AM

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi