Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Gail Taylor
Abstract
Review of Literature
The authors suggest that faculty at institutions of higher learning might create
opportunities for graduate students that address the concerns of graduate students in
an effort to prevent students from dropping out of graduate school. Anderson and
Swazey point to poor advising and mentoring as one reason why graduate students
suffer. The authors recommend action when issues arise that cause conflicts for
graduate students. Anderson and Swazey write, Graduate school faculty and
administrators can, and we believe should, periodically assess the experiences over
time of students in their departments and programs and take remedial actions when
problem areas are identified (12). The authors suggest university leaders, faculty and
staff, may take action by listening to, and recording the experiences of graduate
students for the purpose of taking actions to remove obstacles blocking the path to
student success.
advisor. The method by which students select an advisor varies with the discipline
that is studied (Zhao, Golde, and McCormick 2005); these authors also state that
both students and advisors could benefit from more knowledge about what makes an
advising relationship successful.
These journal articles indicate that academic advising and mentoring are a
process of acculturation. The goal is for the mentor to help the graduate student
understand the different expectations and the new roles that come with matriculating
to ABD and Ph.D. status. Crucial to the graduate students success, according to
researchers, is an institution that demonstrates its appreciation of the unique place
held by the graduate student within the university system (Polson). Polson cites the
1988 work of Polkosnik who identifies five important responsibilities of an academic
advisor to graduate students:
According to a review of the literature, there is need for more research on the
advisor/advisee relationship at the dissertation stage of graduate study. The review of
the literature that I am developing on the topic of advising and mentoring graduate
students is reflective of the need for attention to this matter that affects students from
increasingly diverse backgrounds (Di Pierro 2007; Ender and Wilkie 2000; Gardiner
1994, Golde 2001). An autoethnography of the dissertation process as chronicled by
Gearity and Mertz (2012) focuses on the affective component of the academic
advising process and asks these key questions: What are the doctoral student and
the committee chair thinking, feeling and doing during the dissertation process?
What are those possible barriers or facilitators to persistence? (2).
What this preliminary review of the literature indicates is that in the wake of
fundamental change in how graduate students are seen, there is a greater need for
advising and mentoring that will help graduate students adjust to the new roles and
expectations that the academy demands. While it has traditionally been thought that
graduate students are not just independent learners, but independent people who are
not in need of what might be perceived as extra help from university faculty, staff, or
administration, this traditional paradigm may be outmoded in todays diverse
academic environment.
Therefore, it seems that there is more to being a graduate student than attaining
superior grades, and passing qualifying exams. Successful graduate students have
successful faculty who guide and mentor them to success as they strive to attain the
Ph.D.
The review of literature also seems to indicate that faculty and students must
form positive relationships. Therefore, working with the right faculty may be one of
the most crucial determinants of success for a graduate student.
References
Anderson, M. S., & Swazey, J. P. (1998). Reflections on the graduate student experience:
An overview. New Directions for Higher Education, 1998(101), 3-13.
Dedrick, R. F., & Watson, F. (2002). Mentoring needs of female, minority, and
international graduate students: A content analysis of academic research guides and
related print material. Mentoring and Tutoring, 10(3), 275-289.
10
Ender, S. C., & Wilkie, C. J. (2000). Advising students with special needs. Academic
Advising: A Comprehensive Handbook, , 118-143.
Gearity, B. T. and Merz, M. (2012). From "Bitch" to "Mentor": A doctoral student's story
of self-change and mentoring. The Qualitative Report 2012 Volume 17, Article 59, 127 http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR17/gearity.pdf
Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of today's
doctoral students reveal about doctoral education ERIC Clearinghouse.
Goplerud, E. N. (1980). Social support and stress during the first year of graduate school.
Professional Psychology, 11(2), 283.
11
Lovitts, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000). The hidden crisis in graduate education: Attrition
from ph. D. programs. Academe, 86(6), 44-50.
Nerad, M., & Miller, D. S. (1996). Increasing student retention in graduate and
professional programs. New Directions for Institutional Research, 1996(92), 61-76.
Rose, G. L. (2005). Group differences in graduate students concepts of the ideal mentor.
Research in Higher Education, 46(1), 53-80.
Schlosser, L. Z., Knox, S., Moskovitz, A. R., & Hill, C. E. (2003). A qualitative examination
of graduate advising relationships: The advisee perspective. Journal of Counseling
Psychology.
12
Zhao, C., Golde, C. M., & McCormick, A. C. (2007). More than a signature: How advisor
choice and advisor behaviour affect doctoral student satisfaction. Journal of Further
and Higher Education, 31(3), 263-281.