23.3.

2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/15

GENERAL COURT
Order of the General Court of 29 January 2013 Sagar v Commission (Case T-269/00) (1) (Action for annulment State aid Reductions in social security contributions for undertakings in Venice and Chioggia Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and imposing the recovery of the aid paid Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law) (2013/C 86/23) Language of the case: Italian Parties Applicant: Sagar Srl (Segrate, Italy) (represented by: A. Vianello, M. Merola and M. Pappalardo, lawyers) Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, Agent, and by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer) Interveners in support of the applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: U. Leanza initially, then I. Braguglia, then R. Adam and finally I. Bruni, Agents, and by G. Aiello and P. Gentili, avvocati dello Stato) Order of the General Court of 29 January 2013 Barbini and Others v Commission (Case T-272/00) (1) (Action for annulment State aid Reductions in social security contributions for undertakings in Venice and Chioggia Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and imposing the recovery of the aid paid Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law) (2013/C 86/24) Language of the case: Italian Parties Applicants: Alfredo Barbini Srl (Murano, Italy); Aureliano Toso Srl (Murano); AVMazzega Srl (Murano); Barovier & Toso vetrerie artistiche riunite Srl (Murano); Carlo Moretti Srl (Murano); Effetre SpA (Resana, Italy); Ferro & Lazzarini Srl (Murano); Formia Srl (Murano); Gino Cenedese & Figlio (Murano); La Murrina (Murano); Mazzuccato International Srl (Murano); Nason & Moretti Srl, (Murano); Tfz Internazionale Srl (Murano); V. Nason & C. Srl (Murano); Venini SpA (Murano); Vetreria de Majo Srl (Murano); and Vetreria LAG Srl (Murano) (represented by: A. Vianello, M. Merola and A. Sodano, lawyers)

Re: Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2000/394/EC of 25 November 1999 on aid to firms in Venice and Chioggia by way of relief from social security contributions under Laws Nos 30/1997 and 206/1995 (OJ 2000 L 150, p. 50)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, Agent, and by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the applicants: Italian Republic (represented by: U. Leanza initially, then by I. Braguglia, then R. Adam and finally I. Bruni, Agents, and by G. Aiello and P. Gentili, avvocati dello Stato)

Operative part of the order 1. The plea of inadmissibility raised by the European Commission is joined to the main proceedings. 2. The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law. 3. Sagar Srl, in addition to bearing its own costs, is to pay the costs incurred by the Commission. Operative part of the order 4. The Italian Republic is to bear its own costs. 1. The plea of inadmissibility raised by the European Commission is joined to the main proceedings. Re: Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2000/394/EC of 25 November 1999 on aid to firms in Venice and Chioggia by way of relief from social security contributions under Laws Nos 30/1997 and 206/1995 (OJ 2000 L 150, p. 50)

(1) OJ C 355, 9.12.2000.

2. The action is dismissed as, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

C 86/16

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

23.3.2013

3. Alfredo Barbini Srl, Aureliano Toso Srl, AVMazzega Srl, Barovier & Toso vetrerie artistiche riunite Srl, Carlo Moretti Srl, Effetre SpA, Ferro & Lazzarini Srl, Formia Srl, Gino Cenedese & Figlio, La Murrina, Mazzuccato International Srl, Nason & Moretti Srl, Tfz Internazionale Srl, V. Nason & C. Srl, Venini SpA, Vetreria de Majo Srl, and Vetreria LAG Srl, in addition to bearing their own costs, are to pay the costs incurred by the Commission.

Operative part of the order 1. The plea of inadmissibility raised by the European Commission is joined to the main proceedings. 2. The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law. 3. The Unione degli industriali della provincia di Venezia (Unindus tria), the Comitato Venezia vuole vivire, Siram SpA, Fiorital Srl, Jesurum di M. e A. Levi Morenos Sas, Grafiche Veneziane Srl, Cantiere navale De Poli SpA, Aive Srl, Bortoli Ettore Srl, Tessuti Artistici Fortuny SpA, Lorenzo Rubelli SpA, Tecnomare SpA and Arsenale Venezia SpA, in addition to bearing their own costs, are to pay the costs incurred by the Commission; 4. The Italian Republic is to bear its own costs.

4. The Italian Republic is to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 355, 9.12.2000.

Order of the General Court of 29 January 2013 Unindustria and Others v Commission (Case T-273/00) (1) (Action for annulment State aid Reductions in social security contributions for undertakings in Venice and Chioggia Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and imposing the recovery of the aid paid Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law) (2013/C 86/25) Language of the case: Italian Parties Applicants: Unione degli industriali della provincia di Venezia (Unindustria) (Venice, Italy); Comitato Venezia vuole vivere (Venice); Siram SpA (Milan, Italy); Fiorital Srl (Venice); Jesurum di M. e A. Levi Morenos Sas (Venice); Grafiche Veneziane Srl (Venice); Cantiere navale De Poli SpA (Pellestrina, Italy); Aive Srl (Marcon, Italy); Bortoli Ettore Srl (Venice); Tessuti Artistici Fortuny SpA (Venice); Lorenzo Rubelli SpA (Venice); Tecnomare SpA (Venice); and Arsenale Venezia SpA (Venice) (represented by: A. Vianello, M. Merola and A. Sodano, lawyers)

(1) OJ C 355, 9.12.2000.

Order of the President of the General Court of 1 February 2013 Travetanche Injection v Commission (Case T-368/11 R) (Application for interim measures Dismissal of the main action No need to adjudicate) (2013/C 86/26) Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: Travetanche Injection SPRL (Brussels, Belgium) (repre sented by: K. Van Maldegem and R. Cana, lawyers) Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Oliver and E. Manhaeve, Agents, assisted by K. Sawyer, Barrister)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, Agent, and by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re: Application for suspension of operation of Commission Regu lation (EU) No 366/2011 of 14 April 2011 amending Regu lation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards Annex XVII (Acrylamide)

Intervener in support of the applicants: Italian Republic (represented by: U. Leanza initially, then I. Braguglia, then R. Adam and finally I. Bruni, Agents, and by G. Aiello and P. Gentili, avvocati dello Stato)

Re: Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2000/394/EC of 25 November 1999 on aid to firms in Venice and Chioggia by way of relief from social security contributions under Laws Nos 30/1997 and 206/1995 (OJ 2000 L 150, p. 50)

Operative part of the order There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for interim measures.