C 38/22

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

9.2.2013

4. The Italian Republic shall bear its own costs.

4. The Italian Republic is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 316, 4.11.2000.

(1) OJ C 355, 9.12.2000.

Order of the General Court of 12 December 2012 Bauer v Commission (Case T-253/00) (1) (Action for annulment State aid Reductions in social security contributions for undertakings in Venice and Chioggia Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and imposing the recovery of the aid paid Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law) (2013/C 38/38) Language of the case: Italian Parties Applicant: Bauer SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: G. M. Roberti, F. Sciaudone and A. Bortoluzzi, lawyers)

Order of the General Court of 12 December 2012 Cooperativa San Marco fra Lavoratori della Piccola Pesca and Others v Commission (Case T-260/00) (1) (Action for annulment State aid Reductions in social security contributions for undertakings in Venice and Chioggia Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and imposing the recovery of the aid paid Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law) (2013/C 38/39) Language of the case: Italian Parties Applicants: Cooperativa San Marco fra Lavoratori della Piccola Pesca Burano Soc. coop. rl (Venice, Italy); Cooperativa Coopesca Organizzazione tra Produttori e Lavoratori della Pesca Chioggia Soc. coop. rl (Chioggia, Italy); Cooperativa tra i Lavoratori della Piccola Pesca di Pellestrina Soc. coop. rl (Venice); Cooperativa Pescatori di San Pietro in Volta Soc. coop. rl (Venice); Murazzo Piccola Societ Cooperativa rl (Chioggia); RAM Societ Cooperativa fra Lavoratori della Pesca, Raccoglitori ed Allevatori di Molluschi (Chioggia); Conf cooperative Unione Provinciale di Venezia (Mestre, Italy); and Comitato Venezia Vuole Vivere (Marghera, Italy) (represented by: A. Vianello, lawyer) Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, Agent, and by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer) Intervening party in support of the applicants: The Italian Republic (represented: initially by U. Leanza, then by I. Braguglia, then by R. Adam, and finally by I. Bruni, Agents, and by G. Aiello and P. Gentili, avvocati dello Stato) Re: Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2000/394/EC of 25 November 1999 on aid to firms in Venice and Chioggia by way of relief from social security contributions under Laws Nos 30/1997 and 206/1995 (OJ 2000, L 150, p. 50). Operative part of the order 1. The objection of inadmissibility raised by the European Commission is joined to the substance of the case. 2. The action is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, Agent, and by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the applicant: The Italian Republic (repre sented: initially by U. Leanza, then by I. Braguglia, then by R. Adam, and finally by I. Bruni, Agents, and by G. Aiello and P. Gentili, avvocati dello Stato)

Re: Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2000/394/EC of 25 November 1999 on aid to firms in Venice and Chioggia by way of relief from social security contributions under Laws Nos 30/1997 and 206/1995 (OJ 2000, L 150, p. 50).

Operative part of the order 1. The objection of inadmissibility raised by the European Commission is joined to the substance of the case.

2. The action is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

3. Bauer SpA is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission.

9.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/23

3. Cooperativa San Marco fra Lavoratori della Piccola Pesca Burano Soc. coop. rl, Cooperativa Coopesca Organizzazione tra Produttori e Lavoratori della Pesca Chioggia Soc. coop. rl, Cooperativa tra i Lavoratori della Piccola Pesca di Pellestrina Soc. coop. rl, Cooperativa Pescatori di San Pietro in Volta Soc. coop. rl, Murazzo Piccola Societ Cooperativa rl, RAM Societ Cooperativa fra Lavoratori della Pesca, Raccoglitori ed Allevatori di Molluschi, Confcooperative Unione Provinciale di Venezia et Comitato Venezia Vuole Vivere are ordered to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission. 4. The Italian Republic is ordered to bear its own costs.

Operative part of the order 1. The objection of inadmissibility raised by the European Commission is joined to the substance of the case. 2. The action is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law. 3. Sacaim SpA, Alfier Costruzioni Srl, Azin Asfalti Srl, Barbato Srl, Camata Costruzioni Sas, Dal Carlo Mario & C. Srl, Impresa Costruzioni Civili e Montaggi Srl (ICCEM), Rossi Renzo Costruzioni Srl, Vettore Costruzioni Srl, ACEA Associazione dei Costruttori Edili ed Affini di Venezia e Provincia and Comitato Venezia vuole vivere are ordered to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission. 4. The Italian Republic is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 355, 9.12.2000.

Order of the General Court of 12 December 2012 Sacaim and Others v Commission (Case T-261/00) (1) (Action for annulment State aid Reductions in social security contributions for undertakings in Venice and Chioggia Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and imposing the recovery of the aid paid Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law) (2013/C 38/40) Language of the case: Italian Parties Applicants: Sacaim SpA (Venice, Italy); Alfier Costruzioni Srl (Venice); Azin Asfalti Srl (Venice); Barbato Srl (Venice); Camata Costruzioni Sas (Venice); Dal Carlo Mario & C. Srl (Venice); Impresa Costruzioni Civili e Montaggi Srl (ICCEM) (Marghera, Italy); Rossi Renzo Costruzioni Srl (Marcon, Italy); Vettore Costruzioni Srl (Venice); ACEA Associazione dei Costruttori Edili ed Affini di Venezia e Provincia (Venice); and Comitato Venezia vuole vivere (Marghera) (represented by: A. Vianello, M. Merola, A. Sodano and M. Pappalardo, lawyers) Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, Agent, and by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer) Intervener in support of the applicants: The Italian Republic (repre sented: initially by U. Leanza, then by I. Braguglia, then by R. Adam, and finally by I. Bruni, Agents, and by G. Aiello and P. Gentili, avvocati dello Stato)

(1) OJ C 355, 9.12.2000.

Order of the General Court of 14 December 2012 Dectane v OHIM Hella (DAYLINE) (Case T-463/11) (1) (Community trade mark Opposition Withdrawal of opposition No need to adjudicate) (2013/C 38/41) Language of the case: German Parties Applicant: Dectane GmbH (Leipzig, Germany) (represented by: P. Ehrlinger and T. Hagen, lawyers) Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented: initially by K. Klpfel, then by K. Klpfel and D. Botis, agents) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Hella KGaA Hueck & Co. (Lippstadt, Germany) (represented by: R. Schnekenbhl, lawyer)

Re: Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 June 2011 (Case R 1231/2010-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Hella KGaA Hueck & Co. and Dectane GmbH.

Re: Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2000/394/EC of 25 November 1999 on aid to firms in Venice and Chioggia by way of relief from social security contributions under Laws Nos 30/1997 and 206/1995 (OJ 2000, L 150, p. 50).

Operative part of the order 1. There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.