Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Annotated Bibliography
5 24 August Tag You're It due Tuesday August 25,
by 3pm.
6 31 August Googleolopy?
Through a study of user-generated cultures, this subject traces the influence of media and communication
forms throughout history: from orality and print culture, to music, the screen and the web. The subject
examines communication technologies and media practices from present, past and the near future.
Uncovering the practices and trends of regulation, preservation and disposal of media and communication
technologies is central to the critical approach developed. The subject concludes with a comprehensive
and nuanced understanding our contemporary digital media culture from the context of historical
antecedents.
Formal class times and locations are available from the University’s home page Please note that
tutorial times on the timetable are provisional.
Modes of delivery: the three hour face-to-face session scheduled will involve lecture content,
1hr tutorial and practical exercises and review sessions.
Contact details for the subject co-ordinator can be found on the title page. Contact details for any
other staff teaching the subject will be announced in Week 1.
Consultation times will be announced in Week 1.
Students should have enrolled in tutorials via SOLS before the start of session.
Those with time tabling difficulties should see the Subject Co-ordinator.
Subject Requirements
Attendance requirements:
This subject requires an 80% attendance at all classes unless this is unavoidable on medical or
compassionate grounds and evidence of this is provided through SOLS. Attendance that falls below the
80% requirement, irrespective of the cause, may require you to complete additional written work to
complete the subject. If in doubt, consult either the subject co-ordinator or your tutor.
Completing the subject: To pass this subject you must meet the attendance requirements and
students are required to complete all assessment tasks.
Failure to meet these requirements can lead to a technical fail in the subject.
As part of the core Bachelor of Media and Communication Studies program, this subject continues
to prepare graduates for an informed engagement within the field of media and communication
with an emphasis on the continued development of practical and critical skills relevant to the
fields of Communications, Media, Advertising and Journalism.
4. To recognise and communicate the economic, cultural and political involvement in the concept
of history and how this is reconfigured by the principles of participation supported by new media
and communication technologies.
1: Annotated bibliography
due:Week 5, Tuesday August 25 by 3pm
weighting:30.00%
length:15 x 150 words
Compile brief annotations of 15 web sites on the theme of History 2.0, however interpreted.
Credit will be given for the coherence of the collection, and the useability of the tags. Students
can use this task to begin their preliminary investigation for their major project. Delicious
entries are limited to 1000 Characters per entry (140-150 words).
The University has in place codes of practice, rules and guidelines that define a range of policy issues on
both educational and student matters. Students must refer to the Faculty Handbook or online reference
which contains a range of policies on educational issues and student matters. Some of the policies
relevant to the Arts Faculty are listed below:
Background Materials:
Wesch Mike, 2008,'Anti-Teaching: Confronting the Crisis of Significance', Education Canada, Canadian
Education Association, (available: http://www.cea-ce.ca/media/en/AntiTeaching_Spring08.pdf)
date accessed June 19, 2009.
Background materials on the digital anthropology of media and communications technologies with a focus
on YouTube: Wesch, Mike 2008, The Machine is Us/ing Us, Youtube.com,(available:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLlGopyXT_g ) and Wesch, Mike 2009, An anthropological introduction to
YouTube, Youtube.com, (available: http://www.youtube.com/user/mwesch)
Background Materials:
Burgess, Jean and Green, Joshua 2009, Chapter 5: YouTube's Cultural Politics, Online Video and
Participatory Culture, Polity.
Mihm, Stephen, 2008, 'Everyone's a historian now', The Boston Globe, Mayb 28, 2008 (available
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2008/05/25/everyones_a_historian_now/?page=full
Patricia Lange (2007), ‘Publicly Private and Privately Public: Social Networking on YouTube’, Journal of
Computer Mediated Communication, vol. 13. no. 1, pp. 361-380.
Warschauer, Mark and Grimes, Douglas 2007, 'AUDIENCE, AUTHORSHIP, AND ARTIFACT: THE
EMERGENT SEMIOTICS OF WEB 2.0', Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, vol. 27, pp. 1–
23.
Background Material:
Boyd, Danah and Ellison, Nicole (2007), ‘Social Networking Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship’,
Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, vol.13, no.1, pp. 210-230. Rheingold Howard
"Participative Pedagogy: For a Literacy of Literacies" http://freesouls.cc/essays/03-howard-
rheingold-participative-pedagogy-for-a-literacy-of-literacies.html
Rosenzweig, Roy 2006, 'Can History Be Open Sourced? The Future of the Past', The Journal of American
History, vol. 93. no1. pp 117-146. available: http://chnm.gmu.edu/resources/essays/d/42 (dated
access July, 6, 2009)
Background Material:
Susan Murray, 2008, Digital Images, Photo-Sharing, and Our Shifting Notions of Everyday Aesthetics,
'Journal of Visual Culture vol. 7 no. 2. pp 147-163.
Thomas, Sue 2006, The End of Cyberspace and Other Surprises, 'Convergence: The International
Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp.383-391.
Daniel H. Pink, "Folksonomy," New York Times (December 11, 2005)
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/11/magazine/11ideas1-
21.html?_r=1&ex%1291957200&enP937f27a0973e6e&eiP90&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss
Background Material:
Anna Munster 2008, 'Welcome to Google Earth', Critical Digital Studies A Reader, edited by Arthur Kroker
and Marilouise Kroker, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
Batchelor, Bob 2009, 2009, Google and the End of Wisdon, PopMatters, July 10, 2009, (available:
http://www.popmatters.com/pm/feature/107954-google-and-the-end-of-wisdom July 14, 2009).
Hindman, Mattew, Tsioutsiouliklis, Kostas, Johnson, Judy, A. 2003, ' "Googlearchy": How a Few Heavily-
Linked Sites Dominate Politics on the Web, available:
http://seneca.uab.es/antropologia/jlm/ars/googlearchy--hindman.pdf (last accessed July, 6,
2009).
Jim Naughton, "Google Pays Small Change to Open Every Book in the World"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/nov/02/google-books-scanning-libraries
Background Materials:
50 Banned Books:http://onlinecollegedegree.org/2009/05/20/50-banned-books-that-everyone-should-
read/
Illegal Art: http://www.illegal-art.org/print/index.html
Post-Secret Archives - Secrets in Public: http://postsecretarchive.com/category/secret-archives/
SmartHistory – collaborative multimedia art and art history web-book: http://smarthistory.org/
Background Materials:
Boyle, James, 2008 The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind, Yale University press,
available (in full) at http://www.thepublicdomain.org/download/
Spring Session 2009
Deuze, Mark 2006, 'Participation, Remediation, Bricolage: Considering Principal Components of a Digital
Culture The Information Society: An International Journal, 1087-6537, Volume 22, Issue 2, 2006, Pages
63 – 75 available: http://www.andredeak.com.br/pdf/Digital+Culture+06.pdf July 4, 2009.
Decherney, Peter 2007, 'Copyright dupes: piracy and new media in Edison v. Lubin (1903),' Film History,
vol. 19, no. 2, pp.109 – 125.
Background Materials:
Whelan, Andrew 2009 ' The ‘Amen’ Breakbeat as Fratriarchal Totem' Dichotomies (forthcoming: available
via Delicious.com tag search)
Delicious.com Tags: amen breakbeat musichistory amenbreak music copyright sampling
Background Materials:
The History of Hacking, The Discovery Channel,
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5464925144369700635,
Francesca Coppa, 2006, 'A Brief History of Media Fandom', Fan fiction and fan communities in the age
of the Internet: new essays, McFarland, pp.41-60. (available via Google Books)
Naomi, Klien, 2002 Farewell to 'The End of History': Organisation and vision in Anti-Corporate
Movements, (available http://socialistregister.com/socialistregister.com/files/SR_2002_Klein.pdf )
Wiltse, Ed 2004, Fans, Geeks and Nerds, and the Politics of Online Communities, Proceedings of the
media Ecology Association, vol 5. (available: http://www.media-
ecology.org/publications/MEA_proceedings/v5/Wiltse05.pdf )
McArthur, J. A. 2009 'Digital Subculture: A geek meaning of style,' Journal of Communication Inquiry, vol.
33, no.1, (available http://jci.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/33/1/58)
Background Materials:
Coombe, R, Herman, A (2004) 'Rhetorical Virtues: Property, Speech, and the Commons on the
World-Wide Web', Anthropological Quarterly, vol. 77. no. 3, pp. 559-574.
Davis, P (2003) 'Tragedy of the Commons Revisited: Librarians, Publishers, Faculty and the Demise of a
Public Resource', Libraries and the Academy, vol.3, no.4, pp. 547 – 562.
Dolsak, Nives and Ostrom, Elinor (eds.) 2003, The commons in the new millennium challenges and
adaptation Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press.
Hardin, Garrett, 1968, The Tragedy of the Commons, Science (December 13)
(available http://www.garretthardinsociety.org/articles/art_tragedy_of_the_commons.html)
Levine, P (2002) 'Symposium: Democracy in the Electronic Era', The Good Society, vol.1. no.3. pp 3-9.
Linksvayer, Mike 2008, ‘Facts about Beyond Open Source Software - Open Culture’, Beyond Open
Source Software - Open Culture, Stanford Open Source Lab (un)Conference, Available:
http://www.slideshare.net/mlinksva/cc-stanford-open-source-lab-unconference-presentation (July 1, 2009)
Moore, C. 2005, ‘Commonising the Enclosure: Online Games and Reforming Intellectual Property
Regimes’, Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, vol. 3, no.2, 2005,
Also: Building an Australasian Commons (full book PDF) produced by Creative Commons Australia to
highlight case studies from the Australasian region. Available:
http://creativecommons.org.au/materials/Building_an_Australasian_Commons_book.pdf
Graham Meikle (2002) Future active : media activism and the internet Pluto Press/Routledge. Chapter 4:
Open Publishing, Open Technologies
Delicious.com tags: Indymedia, openpublishing, activism, advocacy, alt.media, catalyst, history2.0
Consult the relevant School and Program on the Faculty of Arts website for the appropriate referencing
system used for this subject at
www.uow.edu.au/arts
OR
http://www.library.uow.edu.au/resourcesbytopic/UOW026631.html#electronic
Presentation
• assessments must be laid out in 1.5 line spacing (minimum) or in double spacing
• use A4 paper
• leave a margin of no less than 4 cm
• strongly encouraged to print on both sides of the paper
• all assessments should be word processed
• all assessments must be page numbered, including bibliographies or works cited (not including
coversheets or title pages).
Unless your tutor or lecturer asks you to do otherwise, submit all assignments by depositing
them in one of the three School slots opposite the Enquiry Centre (19.1050 in the Arts building).
All assignments deposited in the School slots must have a cover sheet attached. Ensure that
all sections are filled in including your tutor’s name, the assignment question and sign the
plagiarism declaration. Coversheets can be found above the bench opposite the Enquiry
Centre. You can also download a coversheet from the Faculty’s webpage at:
www.uow.edu.au/arts/coversheets/index.html - Make sure you download both pages.
Assignments sent by fax or e-mail will not be accepted unless by prior agreement between the
lecturer and student.
Unless your tutor or lecturer asks you to do otherwise, submit all assignments following the
procedures set out on your campus.
All assignments must have a cover sheet attached. Ensure that all sections are filled in
including your tutor’s name, the assignment question and sign the plagiarism declaration. You
can download a coversheet from the Faculty’s webpage at:
www.uow.edu.au/arts/coversheets/index.html - Make sure you download both pages.
Assignments sent by fax or e-mail will not be accepted unless by prior agreement between the
lecturer and student.
The University’s Code of Practice Teaching and Assessment requires that at least one
assignment be assessed and returned before Week 9 of session.
Assignments submitted during session will be returned to you by your lecturer or tutor. The
Enquiry Centre does not hold any assignments during session.
Assignments submitted at the end of session will be held at the Enquiry Centre until the end of
Week 6 of the following session. After this time, assignments will be disposed of. Please take
your student card with you when collecting your work. During this period, assignments can be
collected: Monday-Friday between 11.30am-12.30pm and 3.30pm-4.30pm.
The University’s Code of Practice Teaching and Assessment requires that at least one
assignment be assessed and returned before Week 9 of session.
Assignments submitted during session will be returned to you by your lecturer or tutor.
Assignments submitted at the end of session will be held at your campus until the end of Week
6 of the following session. After this time, assignments will be disposed of. Please take your
student card with you when collecting your work.
Academic Consideration
Students who miss a deadline, or fall below the minimum attendance requirements, or otherwise find their
work in the subject affected by illness or serious misadventure should lodge a formal request for
Academic Consideration via SOLS. The procedures for lodging a request are available at:
Spring Session 2009
http://www.uow.edu.au/about/policy/studentacademicconsiderationpolicy.pdf
Late work (i.e. any work required for assessment that has not been given an extension) will be subject to
a 10% penalty per day. The penalty is applied to the original mark awarded. Work submitted after seven
calendar days will not be marked and will be given a mark of 0.
Plagiarism
Students are responsible for submitting original work for assessment, without plagiarising or cheating,
abiding by the University’s policy on plagiarism as set out in the University Handbook under Universities
Policy Directory and in Faculty Handbooks and subject guides. Plagiarism has led to the expulsion from
the University.
Faculty Handbook
The Faculty issues a Handbook free of charge to all students enrolled in an Arts Subject. It contains
information on the structure of the Faculty’s degrees, the majors offered, the more important University
policies and other matters that may affect your time as a student in the Faculty.
Grievance Procedures:
The term "academic grievance" refers to a complaint by a student concerning an act, omission or decision
by a member of staff that adversely affects a student's academic experience. Some examples of a
grievance include the following:
failure to assess work in accordance with specified criteria;
administrative error in the collating or recording of marks;
failure to address requests for Special Consideration in accordance with the Special
Consideration Policy;
failure of a member of staff to adhere to General Course Rules or requirements of a relevant
Code of Practice;
failure to adhere to Faculty assessment or examination requirements.
The University and the Faculty of Arts have formal Student Academic Grievance Policies that are to be
used only after informal approaches have been made to the relevant staff member. If the informal
approach has an unsatisfactory outcome the student should follow the procedure outlined in the Faculty of
Arts Student Grievance Form.
This form can be downloaded from the UOW website or a copy may be obtained from the Arts Central,
Level 1, Building 19, Room 1050.
For more information: http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/current/stgrievance
Both the Faculty and the University offer support services to its undergraduates.