Transportation (Roads) Nairobi County

4th Thematic Technical Working Group 13th Nov 2013
Road and Urban Transport Sector
ng
JICA STUDY TEAM For The Project on Integrated Urban Development Master Plan for the City of Nairobi in the Republic of Kenya
Gr
ou pM ate
ria
1 2
The Project on Integrated Urban Development Plan for The City of Nairobi in the Republic of Kenya
1. Progress of the Study 2. Future Transport Network Plan 1) Alternative Plans 2) Road Network Plan 3) Public Transport Network Plan 3. Traffic Demand Forecast Result 1) General Methodology 2) Result of Demand Forecast 4. Analysis and Evaluation of Traffic Demand Forecast 5. Staging Plan 1) Basic Strategy 2) Road Development Plan 3) Public Transport Development Plan 4) Demand Forecast and Evaluation of Staging Plan 6. Conclusion and Recommendation
Dr a
ft W
or ki
1. Progress of the Study
4th TWG/ Road and Urban Transport Sector
1. Progress of the Study
ng
Gr
ou pM ate ft W or ki
3 2. Future Transport Network Plan
2. Future Transport Network Plan

1) Alternative Plans
The following Alternative Plans are analyzed to establish network.
Do-nothing Case: Future (2030) traffic demand to present network Case 0:On-going Project Future traffic demand on existing network and on-going projects*
*Refer to next page.
Case 1: Road Development Oriented Case 2006 Road Networked reinforced by future traffic demand and land use plan Case 2: Utilization of Commuter Rail Case Future road network with Commuter Railway network Case 3: Introduction of Selective MRTS Case Case 2+selective/modified MRTS network where demand concentrates
Dr a
ria
4
ng
Gr
ou pM ate
*On-going Projects The following projects are included in the on-going projects. Expanding and upgrading of the Northern Corridor Road including the Elevated highway over the Uhuru Highway Construction of Southern Bypass Road Construction of Missing Link Roads financed by EU Dualling of Outer Ring Road Construction of Western Ring Roads Widening of Ngong Road from Kenyatta Ave. intersection to Dagoretti Widening of Juja Road Upgrading of Langata Road of KWS Gate-Bomas Junction Section
ria
l
5 6
ft W
or ki
2) Road Network Plan
a) Basic Policy for Road Network Plan
Basic network shall be 2006 M/P (NUTRANS) and reinforced in the following aspects: Strengthen circumferential/radial (C/R) network system. Strengthen radial road network connecting surrounding area of Nairobi. (Necessary capacity will be estimated by demand forecast.) Development of new road required by the land use plan. Strengthen east-west axis roads Traffic assignment of future traffic demand to existing road(Do-nothing Case) will be analyzed and necessary capacity will be adopted.
Dr a
ng
Gr
c)ResultofTrafficAssignmentofDonothingCase 2030trafficdemandtopresentnetwork
Dr a
Situation Free flow. Traffic -1.0 congestion does not appear. Traffic congestion 10may appear at a 1.25 peak hour. Traffic congestion 1.25 appears at a peak 1.50 hour. Traffic congestion 1.50may appear all day.
VCR
Source: JICA Survey Team (JST)
VCR: Volume Capacity Ratio Volume includes all type of vehicles
ria
8
b)RoadNetworkProposedbyNUTRANS
In addition to the road network proposed by NUTRANS, the following measures are required in future road network. Widening of Langata Rd to 6-lanes. Widening of Jogoo Rd to 6-lanes. Widening of Eastern Bypass to 4-lanes. Introduction of MRTS to over capacity roads. Especially on-going project roads.
ng
Gr
ou pM ate
Mombasa Rd Waiyaki Way shows VCR over 1.50. Thika Rd shows VCR over 1.50. Outer Ring Rd shows VCR over 1.50. Juja Rd shows VCR over 1.50. Jogoo Rd shows VCR over 1.50. Langata Rd shows VCR over 1.50. Ngong Rd. shows partially VCR over 1.50. Eastern Bypass shows VCR over 1.50.
ria
9 10
ft W
or ki
2. Future Transport Network Plan Road Network
e) Future Road Network in 2030
Dr a
Remark: Route of the circumferential road C2 was altered considering its feasibility.
d) Evaluation of Demand Forecast of Alternative 0
3) Public Transport Network Plan

a) Commuter Rail Network Proposed by NUTRIP
ng
Gr
c) Public Transport Network Proposed by MRTS
Dr a
ria
Legend Bus Rapid Transit Light Rail Transit Metro Rail Commuter Rail Transit Hub Transit Terminal Transit Interchange
l
12
d) Evaluation of Priority Corridor
ng
Gr
e) Selected Priority Corridors and Routes
Dr a
LRT circular route is proposed in order to decrease the number of vehicles going into CBD and make the CBD NMT area. 14
ria
Concept of new terminal in the railway city
ng
New Bus Terminal

15
3. Traffic Demand Forecast Result
ft W
or ki

1) General Methodology : Four-step-method
Dr a
Estimation of Future Population, etc.
Trip Production Trip Generated and Attracted Trip Distribution Modal Split Trip Assignment Future Traffic Volume
The purpose-oriented trip produced in the overall area is forecast. The trip generated and attracted volume by zone is forecast from the trip production. OD table which set trip generated and attracted volume to an Origin/Destination is calculated. The traffic among zones is split by transportation mode. OD table by modal split is assigned to the transportation network
Gr
Person Trip Survey
ou pM ate
Viaduct-1 Viaduct-2
Development of new bus/matatu terminal in the railway city is proposed to alleviate the congestion at the present terminal. Inter-city bus terminals are proposed at the outskirt of urban area. Those terminals also assist the creation of sub-centers.
ria
16
g)Terminal Plan
2) Result of Demand Forecast

Alternative Existing Case Do Nothing 0 On-going Project Year 2013 2030 2030 WALK 3,090,103 3,951,711 3,951,711 3,951,711 3,951,711 3,951,711
0% 2013 DoNothing 2030 Alternative0 2030 Alternative1 2030 Alternative2 2030 Alternative3 2030 20% 45.6% 39.4% 39.4% 39.4% 39.4% 39.4% WALK
PRIVATE 916,624 2,161,718 2,195,331 2,213,695 2,155,726 1,767,773

40%
BUS 2,754,489 3,885,662 3,852,215
ou pM ate
18,421 3,833,869 18,403 3,695,692 214,549 4,062,046
60%
N e w T r a n s p o r t -
Road Development 1 2030 Oriented Utilization of 2030 2 Commuter Rail Introduction of 3 2030 Selective MRTS
45,692 190,456
80% 100% 0.2%
13.5%
40.7%
Gr
21.6%
38.8%
21.9%
38.5% 38.3% 36.9%
22.1%
ng
21.5%
Source: JICA Study Team (JST)
ft W
or ki
PRIVATE
17.6% BUS
RAIL
40.5% 1.9% NewTransport 0.5%
ria
RAIL 14,006 18,587
0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 2.1%
a) Modal Split Forecast
b) Vehicle Assignment Result i)PresentVehicleAssignmentCase Assignmentofpresenttrafficdemandtopresentnetwork
Dr a
l
TOTAL
Unit : Trips 6,775,222 10,017,678 10,017,678 10,017,678 10,017,678 10,017,678
17
18
b) Vehicle Assignment Result ii)AssignmentofFutureTrafficDemand(2030)toExistingNetwork(2013)
ng
Gr
ou pM ate
ria
19 20
ft W
or ki
b) Vehicle Assignment Result iii)Alternative0:OngoingProject VehicleAssignment
Dr a
b) Vehicle Assignment Result iv)Alternative1:RoadDevelopmentOrientedCase VehicleAssignment
ng
Gr
ou pM ate
ria
21 22
ft W
or ki
b) Vehicle Assignment Result v) Alternative2:UtilizationofCommuterRailCase VehicleAssignment
Dr a
b) Vehicle Assignment Result vi)Alternative3:IntroductionofSelectiveMRTSCase VehicleAssignment
ng
Gr
ou pM ate
ria
23 24
ft W
or ki
c) Public Transport Assignment Result i)Alternative2:UtilizationofCommuterRailCase PublicTransportAssignment
Dr a
ng
Gr
ou pM ate
ria ft W or ki
25
ii)2Alternative3:IntroductionofSelectiveMRTSCase PublicTransportAssignment
Dr a
Scaled up
l
26
ii)Alternative3:IntroductionofSelectiveMRTSCase PublicTransportAssignment
4. Analysis and Evaluation of Traffic Demand Forecast

Average VehicleVehicleAverage VCR km Total hours Total Speed (Volume PCU-km PCU-Hour (km/h) Capacity (000) Ratio) 17,780 39,110 37,670 36,490 35,090 30,540
ou pM ate
431,690 41.2 1,692,480 1,173,180 23.1 32.1 929,850 880,110 725,460 39.2 39.9 42.1 273,910 1,254,120 805,560 621,140 582,600 433,330 40.0 20.2 31.7 40.0 40.8 44.9
Alternative Existing Case Do Nothing Case 0 1 On-going Project Case Road Development Oriented Case
Year 2013 2030 2030 2030 2030 2030
Utilization of 2 Commuter Rail Case Introduction of 3 Selective MRTS Case

Gr
ng
ria
1) MajorIndicesbyVehicleAssignment
a)ResultinStudyArea
ft W
or ki
1) MajorIndicesbyVehicleAssignment
Alternative Existing Case Do Nothing Case Project 0 On-going Case Development 1 Road Oriented Case of 2 Utilization Commuter Rail Case of 3 Introduction Selective MRTS Case
Dr a
Year 2013 2030 2030 2030 2030 2030
Average VehicleVehicleAverage VCR km Total hours Total Speed (Volume PCU-km PCU-Hour (km/h) Capacity (000) Ratio) 10,960 25,320 25,520 24,830 23,790 19,450 0.69 1.60 1.32 1.05 1.00 0.82
28
b)ResultinNairobiCity
l
0.54 1.19 1.02 0.85 0.81 0.71
27
0.8 - 1.0
116.4 106.9 84.1 29.2
199.7 151.9 131.3
134.8 120.3 188.2
ou pM ate
178.7 155.7 163.8 193.3 151.7 166.1 99.3 1,518.7 133.3 1,518.7
100% 60% 80% 8.0% 7.4% 5.8% 2.0% 27.9% 10.5% 9.0% 9.1% 8.1% 12.7% 10.3% 10.0% 18.3% 10.8% 8.8% 11.8% 12.7% 10.9% 6.5% 9.0% 7.3% 3.2% 1.5 14.0% 1.21.5 1.01.2
Congestion Existing in Do Nothing Alternative 0 Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Ratio 2013 in 2030 in 2030 in 2030 in 2030 in 2030 -0.8 1,114.7 563.5 770.2 887.2 908.2 1,010.4 1.0 - 1.2 1.2 - 1.5 TOTAL 1.5 -
1,451.4
Existing 2013 DoNothingCase 2030 Alternative0 2030 Alternative1 2030 Alternative2 2030 Alternative3 2030
1,451.4
20%
405.0
1,485.8
40% 76.8%
272.3
ria
144.5 117.1 131.4 807.9
100%
2) Congestion Ratio by Vehicle Assignment
a)ResultinStudyArea
0%
38.8% 51.8% 58.4% 59.8% 66.5%
13.8%
0.8
ng
0.81.0
Gr
ft W
or ki
2) Congestion Ratio by Vehicle Assignment
b)ResultinNairobiCity
0.8 - 1.0 1.0 - 1.2 1.2 - 1.5 TOTAL 1.5 -
Dr a
Congestion Existing in Do Nothing Alternative 0 Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Ratio 2013 in 2030 in 2030 in 2030 in 2030 in 2030 -0.8 510.2 171.1 243.3 329.6 343.5 450.6 81.0 69.5 62.3 751.2
Existing 2013 DoNothingCase 2030 Alternative0 2030 Alternative1 2030 Alternative2 2030 Alternative3 2030 0.8 22.8% 31.2% 40.8% 42.5% 55.8% 0.81.0 1.01.2 9.2%
69.2 80.6 85.8
81.8 87.2
127.6 109.9
139.1 778.9
40% 67.9% 10.7% 10.5% 11.4% 11.2% 15.8% 17.9% 17.9% 13.6% 60%
143.3 807.9
10.8%
28.1
0%
751.2
20%
344.5
227.4
97.6
80% 9.3%
71.4
8.3% 3.7%
45.9% 29.2% 17.7% 16.3% 13.3% 12.1% 8.8% 10.4% 1.8% 1.5
14.5% 18.7% 1.21.5
l
212.8 136.4 110.8 1,518.7 48.3
Unit : km
29
151.4 107.6 83.9
Unit : km
807.9
14.5
30
- Development of roads cannot solve the traffic congestion as shown in p.21. Reinforcement of mass transit and introduction of new transit system are requisite. - By reinforcement of commuter rail and introduction of BRT to 6 corridors, traffic congestion is eased especially in the eastern area of city centre.
ng
Gr
- As the result, Alternative 3 is recommended solution against the future increasing traffic demand.
ou pM ate
- Comparing the indices of Alternative 0 to 3, vehicle-km, vehicle-hours and average VCR decrease due to the development of Mass Transit.
ria
31
3) Evaluation of Alternatives
5. Staging Plan
ft W
or ki
5. Staging Plan
1) Basic Strategy
Target of road and urban transport 1) Network in coordination with land use 2) Network for world class mobility 1st Phase Present to 2018 Study/technical Network in assistance for coordination development of with Land infrastructure in Use Railway City Improvement of network to solve existing issues. Institutional arrangement for strengthening public transport 2nd Phase 2019 to 2023 Development of infrastructure in Railway City 3rd Phase 2024 to 2030 Network development to connect subcentres
Dr a
Network for world class mobility
Introduction of MRTS Expand to pilot corridors. Development of road introduction of MRTS to plural corridors to introduce corridors MRTS Establishment of Strengthening of C/R network circumferential roads system to form the C/R 32 network
5. Staging Plan
Short Term (-2018) Road Network
ng
Gr
ou pM ate
5. Staging Plan
ria
33
2) Road Development Plan Medium Term (-2023) Road Network
Dr a
ft W
or ki
l
34
2) Road Development Plan
5. Staging Plan
Long Term (-2030) Road Network
ng
Gr
ou pM ate
5. Staging Plan
ria
35
3) Public Transport Development Plan Medium Term (-2023) Public Transport Network
Dr a
ft W
or ki
l
36
2) Road Development Plan
5. Staging Plan
Long Term (-2030) Public Transport Network
ng
Gr
ou pM ate
5. Staging Plan
ria
37
Unit : Trips RAIL 14,006 14,416 181,736 TOTAL 6,775,222 7,832,087 8,858,349 190,456 10,017,678
100% 0.2% 0.2% 2.1% 1.9% 0.5%
ft W
or ki
4) Demand Forecast and Evaluation of Staging Plan
Dr a
1) Result of Modal Split Forecast

Alternative Existing 3 Year WALK PRIVATE BUS N e w T r a n s p o r t 45,692
80% 40.7%
2013 3,090,103
916,624 2,754,489
Introduction of Selective MRTS Introduction of 3 Selective MRTS Introduction of 3 Selective MRTS
2018 3,246,051 1,289,796 3,281,824 2023 3,606,326 1,506,186 3,564,101 2030 3,951,711 1,767,773 4,062,046
0% 2013 Alternative3 2018 Alternative3 2023 Alternative3 2030
20% 45.6%
40% 13.5%
60%
41.4%
16.5%
41.9%
40.7%
17.0%
40.2%
39.4% WALK PRIVATE
17.6% BUS RAIL
40.5% NewTransport
l
38
3) Public Transport Development Plan
5. Staging Plan
ng
Gr
ou pM ate
5. Staging Plan
ria
39 40
i) Existing in 2013
ft W
or ki
2) Vehicle Assignment Result ii) Alternative 3 in 2018
Dr a
2) Vehicle Assignment Result
5. Staging Plan
ng
Gr
ou pM ate
5. Staging Plan
ria
41 42
iv) Alternative 3 in 2023
ft W
or ki
2) Vehicle Assignment Result v) Alternative 3 in 2030
Dr a
2) Vehicle Assignment Result
5. Staging Plan
ng
Gr
ou pM ate
5. Staging Plan
ria
43 44
ii) Alternative 3 in 2023
ft W
or ki
3) Public Transport Assignment Result iii)-1 Alternative 3 in 2030
Dr a
3) Public Transport Assignment Result
5. Staging Plan
ng
Gr
ou pM ate
5. Staging Plan
ria
3) Public Transport Assignment Result v) Alternative 3 in 2023 (Scaled up)
ft W
or ki
3) Public Transport Assignment Result vi) Alternative 3 in 2030 (Scaled up)
Dr a
l
45 46
5. Staging Plan
i) Result in Study Area
Existing Case 3 3 3
2013
17,780
ou pM ate
431,690 41.2 618,900 39.1 680,230 39.7 725,460 42.1 VehicleAverage hours Total Speed PCU-Hour (km/h) 273,910 424,160 444,960 433,330 40.0 38.2 40.6 44.9
Alternative
Year
Vehiclekm Total PCU-km (000)
VehicleAverage hours Total Speed PCU-Hour (km/h)
Introduction of 2018 Selective MRTS Case Introduction of Selective MRTS Case 2023 Introduction of 2030 Selective MRTS Case
24,170
27,000
ng
Gr
30,540
ria
2) Major Indices by Traffic Assignment
5. Staging Plan
ft W
or ki
2) Major Indices by Traffic Assignment

Alternative
ii) Result in Nairobi City
Dr a
Year 2013
Vehiclekm Total PCU-km (000) 10,960 16,210 18,040 19,450
Existing Case 3 3 3
Introduction of Selective MRTS Case 2018 Introduction of Selective MRTS Case 2023 Introduction of Selective MRTS Case 2030
l
Average VCR (Volume Capacity Ratio) 0.54 0.69 0.72 0.71
47
Average VCR (Volume Capacity Ratio) 0.69 0.92 0.90 0.82
48
5. Staging Plan
i) Result in Study Area
0.8 - 1.0 1.0 - 1.2 1.2 - 1.5 1.5 TOTAL
116.4 106.9 84.1 29.2 1,451.4

0% Existing 2013 Alternative3 2018 Alternative3 2023 Alternative3 2030 20%
161.4 101.1 130.9 98.1 1,480.9

40% 76.8%
ou pM ate
147.2 127.9 148.7 122.3 129.0 111.7 113.9 107.1
100%
Congestion Ratio -0.8
Existing in Alternative 3 Alternative 3- Alternative 3- Alternative 3 2013 in 2018 1 in 2023 2 in 2023 in 2030 1,114.7 989.4 980.4 1,004.1 1,010.4 212.8 136.4 110.8 48.3 1,518.7
Unit : km
1,496.2
60%
1,496.2
80%
8.0% 7.4% 5.8% 2.0%
66.8%
67.1%
Gr
10.9% 6.8% 8.8% 6.6%
9.9%
8.2% 7.6% 7.2%
ng
66.5%
14.0% 1.21.5
9.0% 7.3% 3.2% 1.5
ria
100%
3) Congestion Ratio by Traffic Assignment
0.8
0.81.0
1.01.2
5. Staging Plan
ft W
or ki
3) Congestion Ratio by Traffic Assignment
ii) Result in Nairobi City
0.8 - 1.0 1.0 - 1.2 1.2 - 1.5 1.5 TOTAL
Dr a
Congestion Ratio -0.8
Existing in Alternative 3 Alternative 3- Alternative 3- Alternative 3 2013 in 2018 1 in 2023 2 in 2023 in 2030 510.2 389.8 403.4 419.0 450.6 81.0 69.5 62.3 28.1 751.2
0% Existing 2013 20%
122.6 100.9 83.0 773.9
77.7
108.6 106.5 69.9 789.3

60% 80%
116.9 93.1 64.3 789.3
95.9
100.9
40%
67.9%
10.8%
9.3%
8.3% 3.7%
Alternative3 2018 Alternative3 2023 Alternative3 2030
50.4%
15.8%
10.0%
13.0%
10.7%
53.1%
14.8%
12.2%
11.8%
8.1%
55.8%
18.7%
13.3%
10.4% 1.8%
0.8
0.81.0
1.01.2
1.21.5
1.5
l
49 151.4 107.6 83.9 14.5 807.9
Unit : km
50
6. Conclusion and Recommendation

1. In the short term and medium term, traffic condition will worsen because improvement of network cannot catch up the increasing traffic demand. 2. Under the condition that the proposed plan is implemented, transport condition will be improved in the target year. To this end, improvement of public transport network as well as road network is essential to realize future transport network. Road Network 1. Improvement of Mombasa Rd-Waiyaki Way is crucial project for the whole Nairobi city. According to the analysis of the study, viaduct over Nyayo Stadium round about is necessary to reduce congestion. (See P.42)
ng
2. Entry of heavy vehicles inside the area surrounded by eastern, northern and southern bypass shall be restricted after the completion of southern bypass.
Gr
ou pM ate
ria
General
ft W
or ki
Public Transport Network
2. Obtaining general consensus for the improvement of transport network among the passengers and operators of bus/matatu is also requested. Short Term Measures Result of traffic demand forecast shows the traffic congestion worsen in the short term and medium term . To cope with the issue, various measures should be undertaken. 1. System signal control Integrated Urban Surveillance System (IUSS) is now introduced to CBD area. But traffic congestion occurs in wider area, especially along the radial trunk road in the city, system signal control in the whole city area is expected.
52
Dr a
1. In order to materialize the MRTS plan, not only the physical infrastructure but also institutional framework, especially establishment of operator, is basically requested.
l
51
ng
5. Relocation of Bus terminals Along with the land use plan for development of sub-centers in the outskirts area, disposition of bus terminals is expected. These terminals will function as the transfer terminal from matatu to large bus.
Gr
4. Streamline the fleet Carrier In the information age, volume of commodity has become smaller but frequency has become high. Introduction of cooperating distribution system is highly required to decrease the number of vehicle trips in the business area.
ou pM ate
3. Staggered working hours In the morning peak, more than 20% of private car arrival is from 7:00 to 8:00. But the before and after the peak hour, traffic volume decreases to only 5%. Staggered working hours can use the transport facilities more efficiently.
ria
2. Introduction of bus-exclusive lane. Even before introduction of BRT, bus exclusive lane is effective to enhance the use of public transport.
Dr a
ft W
or ki
l
53 54

Transportation (Roads) Nairobi County

Transféré par

Informations du document

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Transportation (Roads) Nairobi County

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

4th Thematic Technical Working Group 13th Nov 2013

Road and Urban Transport Sector

1. Progress of the Study

4th TWG/ Road and Urban Transport Sector

1. Progress of the Study

2. Future Transport Network Plan

2. Future Transport Network Plan

4th TWG/ Road and Urban Transport Sector

2) Road Network Plan

a) Basic Policy for Road Network Plan

2. Future Transport Network Plan

4th TWG/ Road and Urban Transport Sector

Source: JICA Survey Team (JST)

VCR: Volume Capacity Ratio Volume includes all type of vehicles

2. Future Transport Network Plan

4th TWG/ Road and Urban Transport Sector

2. Future Transport Network Plan Road Network

4th TWG/ Road and Urban Transport Sector

e) Future Road Network in 2030

d) Evaluation of Demand Forecast of Alternative 0

2. Future Transport Network Plan

4th TWG/ Road and Urban Transport Sector

3) Public Transport Network Plan

c) Public Transport Network Proposed by MRTS

2. Future Transport Network Plan

4th TWG/ Road and Urban Transport Sector

d) Evaluation of Priority Corridor

e) Selected Priority Corridors and Routes

2. Future Transport Network Plan

4th TWG/ Road and Urban Transport Sector

Concept of new terminal in the railway city

New Bus Terminal

3. Traffic Demand Forecast Result

3. Traffic Demand Forecast Result

Estimation of Future Population, etc.

Person Trip Survey

4th TWG/ Road and Urban Transport Sector

3. Traffic Demand Forecast Result

4th TWG/ Road and Urban Transport Sector

2) Result of Demand Forecast

PRIVATE 916,624 2,161,718 2,195,331 2,213,695 2,155,726 1,767,773

BUS 2,754,489 3,885,662 3,852,215

38.5% 38.3% 36.9%

Source: JICA Study Team (JST)

3. Traffic Demand Forecast Result

40.5% 1.9% NewTransport 0.5%

a) Modal Split Forecast

4th TWG/ Road and Urban Transport Sector

b) Vehicle Assignment Result i)PresentVehicleAssignmentCase Assignmentofpresenttrafficdemandtopresentnetwork

Source: JICA Study Team (JST)

VCR: Volume Capacity Ratio Volume includes all type of vehicles

Unit : Trips 6,775,222 10,017,678 10,017,678 10,017,678 10,017,678 10,017,678

3. Traffic Demand Forecast Result

4th TWG/ Road and Urban Transport Sector

b) Vehicle Assignment Result ii)AssignmentofFutureTrafficDemand(2030)toExistingNetwork(2013)

Source: JICA Study Team (JST)

4th TWG/ Road and Urban Transport Sector

b) Vehicle Assignment Result iii)Alternative0:OngoingProject VehicleAssignment

Source: JICA Study Team (JST)

VCR: Volume Capacity Ratio Volume includes all type of vehicles

3. Traffic Demand Forecast Result

4th TWG/ Road and Urban Transport Sector

b) Vehicle Assignment Result iv)Alternative1:RoadDevelopmentOrientedCase VehicleAssignment

Source: JICA Study Team (JST)