Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
FINAL
Compiled by:
Imelda Diouf
Development Consultant and Gender Specialist
ID Development Consultancy
Associate: Institute of Women’s and Gender Studies
University of Pretoria
CONTENT PAGE
Diagrams Page
Diagram 1 Strategy Framework for Growth and Development 2004-2014 8
Appendices Page
Appendix 1 Gender Practitioner Support Model (GPSM) 47
Appendix 2 DOH Gender Analysis 48
Appendix 3 Treasury Gender Analysis 49
Appendix 4 DEAET Gender Recommendations 50
Appendix 5 DOH Gender Recommendations 51
Appendix 6 DRPW Gender Recommendations 52
Appendix 7 PGDP Workshop Programme 53
Appendix 8 PGDP Workshop Programme 55
Appendix 9 PGDP Workshop Notes 56
II. Acknowledgements
Mainstreaming gender into the Provincial Growth and Development Strategy (PGDP) 2004-2014 has
been and will continue to be a multi-faceted and complex process that will require energy, knowledge,
skill, innovation and the constant formation of development partners. Despite the time constraints,
limited human capacity and the enormity of the task; the support received over the last few months in
for the gender mainstreaming process has been tremendous.
At the start of a gender journey to mainstream gender into the PGDP, special thanks go to the
following institutions and people for their time, commitment and support:
Office of the Premier of Eastern Cape Province, the Programme Management Unit; Office of the
Status of Women - Eastern Cape; the entire staff of the PGDP Project Management Unit; Departments
of Agriculture; Safety, Security and Liaison; Social Development; Health; SAPS; Roads & Public
Works; Correctional Services; Economic Affairs, Environment and Tourism; Education; Treasury;
Sport, Recreation, Arts & Culture; Housing, Local Government & Traditional Affairs. All the Gender
Focal Points in the respective departments; members of the Gender Think Tank – Ms Bea Hackula, Dr
Sibongile Muthwa; Dr C. Macleod, Ms T. Mpumlwana, Ms P. Badi and Ms Zukelwa Mkalaka.
UNDP also wishes to acknowledge the support from the head of the OSW Ms Zukelwa Mkalaka, Ms
Imelda Diouf , Gender Specialist who worked tirelessly with the departments and Gender Focal Points
in gendering the PGDP process and Ms Janet Kabeberi Macharia, Gender and Development Policy
Advisor, Southern Africa SURF for spearheading the process of gendering the PGDP.
The document has been structured in such a way as to afford the reader both a sense of the
background to the Provincial Growth and Development Plan (PGDP) 2004-2014 of the Eastern Cape
Province, as well as an understanding of the initiatives that have been undertaken to mainstream
gender into the PGDP process. Within the context of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and
the National Gender Policy Framework of South Africa; gender mainstreaming and social
development find a fertile ground for discussion and debate, advocacy and lobbying, as well as action.
As with so many marginalised development initiatives though, there is often the cry of "why didn't
this process start much sooner?" and "shouldn't these initiatives should have been undertaken during
an earlier phase?" Pragmatically we can reflect and concur that the very nature of marginalised issues
is that they are placed at the periphery of strategic objectives and goals; and are thus afforded less
time, space, personnel, budget and commitment. Marginalised issues often experience a number of
starts before they gain critical status and are then afforded a space on the agenda.
Despite the above mentioned challenges the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
undertook to support the process of mainstreaming gender into the Provincial Growth and
Development Plan (PGDP) of the Eastern Cape provincial government. This support was carried out
in two phases. The first phase, January to August 2003, focussed on ensuring that gender was fully
integrated into the Strategy Framework of the PGDP and that the ensuing programme priorities of the
PGDP were engendered. In the initial stages a detailed gender analysis of the strategy framework was
undertaken and recommendations were made as to what needed to be done to ensure that gender
concerns were fully mainstreamed. Initial discussions were held with the PMU as well as technical
stakeholders all of whom gave their views as to how best to engender the PGDP. Activities in the
phase were undertaken jointly by the UNDP Gender and Development {Policy Advisor) and the Head
of the Provincial Office of the Status of Women. The second phase, September to December 2003,
involved contracting the services of a Gender Specialist to work closely with the various departments
on ensuring that the departmental plans were fully engendered as well as building the capacity of the
respective Gender Focal points to enable them to analyse departmental plans through a gender lens
and make the necessary recommendations. The consultant worked closely with the Head of the Office
of the Status of Women as well as the UNDP Gender and Development (Policy Advisor).
Between September to December 2003 a number of support initiatives were considered, discussed and
undertaken to mainstream gender into the PGDP. These multi-disciplinary support initiatives are
detailed in this report and include aspects of challenges experienced, support received, progress to
date and specific recommendations. Over the three-month period stakeholders were constantly putting
forward ideas and making suggestions about the gender mainstreaming process; these have also been
consolidated and are detailed as key recommendations and should add to both strategic and
operational future planning of the PGDP.
The twenty-four key recommendations have been categorised into focus areas; namely strategic
planning, institutional arrangements, monitoring and evaluation, stakeholder base, training needs and
communications. They have short, medium and long-term implications for mainstreaming gender into
the PGDP and require further appraisal of methodology and timing. Because the recommendations
have both strategic and operational components; it is vital that both managers and implementers
support an approach that is holistic and integrated into every phase of the PGDP; this includes,
contextualisation, programming, identification, assessment, formulation, financing, implementation
and evaluation. The recommendations have equal importance for planning and budgeting processes,
as for programming and activities; and come together in strategic, operational and business plans.
While the detailed key recommendations may be considered vital for gendering of the PGDP; they are
by no means comprehensive and should be understood in the context of the three-month consultancy
period of developing this report on how to engender the PGDP. Gendering is a transformation process
that often requires a mental shift, changing of attitudes and ways of operating within communities and
the broader society; any one initiative can therefor never bring about the desired vision of gender
equality. By the same token gender transformation requires action and interaction at every level of the
society, many initiatives that will ultimately lead to building a critical mass of action. The work of the
last few months in "gendering" the PGDP has been part of building the critical mass of action.
The Provincial Growth and Development Plan (PGDP) 2004-2014, of the Eastern Cape Provincial
Government sets out the provincial vision, targets and programmes aimed at economic growth,
employment creation, poverty eradication and income redistribution; with a focus on achieving
improvement in the quality of life for the poorest people in the province. This ten-year plan is
currently being further revised and developed by the Eastern Cape Provincial Government and its
social partners, as it takes cognisance of the socio-economic realities of the province, the needs of
stakeholders, the methodological considerations of clustering approaches, as well as the broad growth
and development criteria of the South African government.
The Strategy Framework for Growth and Development 2004-2014, the product of phase 1 of the
PGDP process, was adopted by the Executive Council, Province of the Eastern Cape, on 4 June 2003.
Currently, the focus is on the development of programmes and projects to give the Strategy
Framework concrete form. Six PGDP Strategic Objectives are identified in the framework; these can
be represented in terms of Diagram 1:
Co of m
rit omy
ns a n
oli uf
se con
y
da ac
e
cu
tio tu
oo n
n, rin
f f aria
d
de g b
g o agr
ve as
Public Sector
lo p e
en he
& Institutional
m & to
th f t
in
Transformation
en
ng n o
t a uris
tre atio
m re
nd m
t
lop ctu
en
an form
De
Hu our ent
div pot
Re lo p
ve ru
ve
ds
m ce
s
e r en
De rast
s
an
an
sif tia
f
Tr
ica l
In
m
t io
n
The PGDP Strategic Objectives that form the sides of the triangle have been referred to as the “key
objectives”, with the objectives in the centre of the triangle referred to as the “foundation objectives”.
These PGDP Strategic Objectives are clearly related, with work towards one necessarily impacting on
the others. Although the “super goal” of the PGDP is poverty eradication, poverty eradication has also
been identified as one of the six PGDP Strategic Objectives to emphasise that poverty eradication is
not merely a by-product of growth, but requires particular developmental interventions.
The PGDP programmes and projects that are being developed in support of these PGDP Strategic
Objectives have been categorised as follows:
These categories are clearly not independent of each other, as the short- and medium-term
programmes and projects will lay the foundations for the long-term programmes and projects. They all
derive their logic and justification from the PGDP Strategic Objectives themselves. Clearly,
knowledge of the PGDP Strategic Objectives and the three categories of programmes and projects is
not sufficient. What is also required is an understanding of what, in measurable terms, these are aimed
at achieving. At a broad level, the PGDP is aimed at achieving the quantified vision contained in the
Strategy Framework for Growth and Development 2004-2014.
Section 5 of the Strategy Framework for Growth and Development 2004-2014, contains a section
entitled “Principles underlying the PGDP” and, as its name implies, highlights key principles that
should inform planning and implementation. These principles relate to gender, youth, disability,
socio-economic rights and environmental management, amongst others. In terms of a gender
responsive PGDP, the following statement lays the foundation for a gendered PGDP process:
This quantified vision consists of the following 14 broad targets, which, collectively, will constitute
the measure of success in achieving growth and development in the province:
3. To reduce by between 60% and 80% the number of households living below the
poverty line by 2014.
4. To reduce by between 60% and 80% the proportion of people suffering from hunger
by 2014.
6. To ensure universal primary education (UPE) by 2014, with all children proceeding
to the first exit point in a secondary education.
While some of these targets are "woman and gender focussed", and so clearly meet the requirement of
gendering the PGDP; within a broader context they need to be understood and evaluated in terms of
whether they meet the practical or strategic gender needs of gendering processes. Poverty alleviation
programmes can meet immediate, practical needs of women by providing short-term work and
welfare, but if they do not focus on changing gender inequality within the society, women could
remain at risk of fluctuating in and out of chronic poverty.
While it is envisaged that the 14 broad targets will maintain an economic growth rate of between 5%
and 8% per annum; it does not necessarily follow that this will impact positively on the lives of
women, especially on the lives of poor, rural women. Mainstreaming gender requires that these 14
broad targets need to be interrogated at another level, a level that takes cognisance of the fact that
women experience poverty differently to men. Put on a gender lens, and then ask the following
questions:
1. Will an economic growth rate of between 5% and 8% per annum impact positively on
the lives of poor, rural women?
2. Taking cognisance of women's triple role, what are the considerations for halving the
unemployment rate by 2014?
4. What are the gender indicators that will measure a reduction in people suffering from
hunger by 60% to 80% by 2014?
5. To what extent and at what level do women participate in the policy, planning and
budgeting of food security programmes?
6. To what extent does school infrastructure and curriculum impact on girl-child retention
rates?
7. Taking cognisance of women's triple role, what are the considerations for improving the
literacy rate by 2014?
8. What are the qualitative, as well as the quantitative considerations for eliminating
gender disparity in education and unemployment?
11. What are the gender implications for reducing the spread of HIV/AIDS by 2014?
12. How will women's education reverse the spread of tuberculosis by 2014?
13. What is the impact of clean water on women's health and welfare?
14. What is the extent of women's participation in the policy and planning processes to
eliminate sanitation problems by 2014?
The National Gender Policy Framework clearly details the many challenges faced by women in South
Africa, and suggests that in order to achieve a society that is free of gender oppression, a paradigm
shift is required in terms of resource allocations and gender relations. The challenges that women face
impact on every aspect of their lives; namely lack of access to basic resources, lack of access to
employment, lack of access to land, lack of access to science and technology, violence, HIV/AIDS,
lack of access to the economy, poverty and oppressive gender relations.
In a section on Women and Poverty1 in South Africa's National Policy Framework for Women's
Empowerment and Gender Equality, reference is made to the phenomenon called the feminisation of
poverty. A number of factors contribute towards the poverty of women in South Africa. The following
statistics are quoted:
• over a third (37%) of rural women-headed households are among the poorest fifth of
households
• 35% of economically African women are unemployed
• 49% of employed African women are working in elementary unskilled occupations such as
cleaning, garbage collection and farm work
• 30% of all non-urban households collect wood for cooking and heating; usually women
perform these tasks
• women comprise 58% of illiterate people
• 22% of all pregnant women attending antenatal clinics tested HIV positive
The PGDP in the Strategy Framework for Growth and Development recognises that women bear a
greater burden of poverty2 and commits itself to an approach that is gender responsive;
"The strategic approach to poverty eradication is aimed at not only addressing income poverty,
but also at increasing the asset base of the poor. It is based on a determination to address the
human dimensions of poverty, especially gender, and on the recognition of the need to mobilise
social partnerships to ensure that resources are well targeted and to increase the power of the
poor in the fight against poverty."
In support of this approach, gender mainstreaming is an integral part of the transformation processes
that needs to operate at the levels of contextualisation, programming, identification, assessment,
formulation, financing, implementation and evaluation, if the goal of poverty eradication is to be
realised. Continuous gender analysis of PGDP documents and processes, structures and advocacy can
only support the mainstreaming of gender that will lead to the vision of gender equality in the Eastern
Cape Province and South Africa.
1
South Africa's National Policy Framework for Women's Empowerment and Gender Equality
2
Strategy Framework for Growth and Development 2004-2014, Eastern Cape Province; Pg 28
Although the initial drafts of the Strategic Framework for the PGDP revealed a clear intention to have
a gender responsive PGDP, gender was fleetingly referred to. Accordingly a main focus of phase one
of the engendering process was to ensure that the Strategy Framework made a commitment to ensure
that gender was fully mainstreamed into all processes and programme priorities of the PGDP.
The Technical Stakeholders (from the Departments and municipalities) meeting held on May 14 in
Bisho set the pace for the key concerns that needed to be addressed in gendering the PGDP
programmes;
• The inaction regarding gender issues in the Province’s institutional structure was a concern.
Although departments are aware of the policies, the practical application is severely lacking
both at the provincial and local spheres of government especially with respect to planning,
budgeting, implementation and monitoring and evaluation.
• One of the problems relating to departmental inaction is the lack of capacity to implement
gender policies especially within top management.
• Lack of sex disaggregated data meant that attempts to improve the quality of lives of the
poorest sections of the population (dominated by women) would be difficult.
In addition some of the gendering processes initially considered in the Strategy Development phase
included the following:
An analysis of the adopted Strategy Framework for Growth and Development 2004-2014 however
continued to raise concerns regarding whether gender would be carried through to the implementation
phase of the PGDP. The Commitment outlined in the Principles in Section 5 laid the foundation for a
deeper and specific process of ensuring the PGDP was gendered. Likewise the Premier at the launch
of the PGDP reiterated the importance of ensuring that gender was fully mainstreamed into all the
PGDP process and programmes. The overall objective of gendering the PGDP is therefore to ensure
that the PGDP is not only gender sensitive, but also to ensure that it will form the basis for the
development of gender responsive programmes. Despite these commitments, there was still a need to
specifically focus on gendering processes and gender criteria, to ensure that during the
implementation phase, gender would not be viewed as merely a project within its broad strategy; but
rather as a transformation process.
A gender analysis of the Draft Programme Priorities prepared after the launch of the Strategic
Framework was carried out in August, which showed that unless the departments were supported in
understanding and mainstreaming gender into the departmental plans, the overall PGDP programmes
would in the long term fail to be gender responsive. Accordingly, there was a need to assist the
various provincial departments in identifying their gender-related priorities and interventions to
address gender inequities. There was also the need to assist with the development of strategies that
would ensure that objectives, outputs, and activities were sensitive to gender equality and would meet
the needs and priorities of both women and men and, minimise constraints to women’s participation.
The above concerns were addressed in a second phase which necessitated engaging a consultant to
work closely with the departments for a period of three months. Within the limited three-month period
and, the constant deadlines of the provincial budgeting cycle and PGDP deliverables, the following
outputs and results could reasonably be expected:
• gender relevant information and analyses fully incorporated into relevant sections of the
PGDP and the different departmental plans
• a fully gender responsive PGDP for the Eastern Cape Province
• gender responsive programmes with gender sensitive monitoring indicators developed
• a fully developed strategy and training plan for building gender competence within the
provincial departments to input into PGDP programming and implementation phase.
• collected and presented data should be sex disaggregated; in case this is not possible, adequate
justification should be provided
• time constraints imposed by both project management unit (PMU) time schedules, as well as
government deadlines in terms of budgeting processes
• recognition of the relevant stakeholders and whom to approach for relevant information
• lack of access to relevant persons in government departments; often not based on an
unwillingness, but rather time constraints and the adhoc nature of conducting business
• limited skills capacity generally within the province, for example gender analysis, gender
disaggregated data, gendered policies and planning
• inability to attend all relevant meetings and workshops where invitations were received
because of clashing dates and times
While these and a range of other challenges persisted over the three months; the work was made
exciting, innovative and sometimes even easy by the abundant willingness and support for gender
issues. These challenges and strengths are further detailed in the narrative of the specified support
initiatives of this document.
The National Gender Policy Framework outlines South Africa's vision for gender equality and for
how it intends to realise this ideal. It details overarching principles, which are to be integrated by all
sectors into their own sectoral policies, practices and programmes, and provides for a vision of human
rights which incorporates acceptance of equal and inalienable rights of all women and men. This ideal
is a fundamental tenet under the Bill of Rights of The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa,
1996 (Act 108 of 1996). The National Gender Policy Framework attempts to ensure that the process
of achieving gender equality is at the very centre of the transformation process in South Africa within
all the structures, institutions, policies, procedures, practices and programmes of government, its
agencies and parastatals, civil society and the private sector.
The National Gender Policy Framework has adopted and prioritises the "basic needs" approach which
requires intersectoral programme implementation. To deliver programmes, those involved will have to
mobilise across a number of sectors to address the multiple needs assumed within this model. The
Gender Policy Framework sees the 'women's empowerment' approach as focusing more on practical
needs which in themselves are complementary to the 'basic needs' approach, as described in the
Gender and Development (GAD) approach. Given the high levels of inequalities that pertain in the
South African context, the focus on women's empowerment in the policy framework affirms the
satisfaction of basic needs (practical gender needs) as a necessary precondition towards the
identification and attainment of strategic gender needs.
In the process of mainstreaming gender into the PGDP, there is a need to consider that the
mainstreaming process needs to operate on three levels:
• the macro level (country or community level) - this would include provincial, regional and
local levels
• the intermediate level (institutional or organisational level) - this would include departmental,
parastatal, civil society and business levels
• the micro level (project level) - this would include programmes, projects and activities
Gender analysis frameworks have been developed for each of these levels. Well-known gender
analysis frameworks to integrate the gender perspective in the project cycle includes the Harvard
Analytical Framework, the Moser Framework, the Gender Analysis Matrix, Women's Empowerment
(Longwe) Framework and the Social Relations Approach. Checklists for the integration of the gender
perspective in the project cycle are also available from the World Bank, the Food and Agriculture
Organisation (FAO) of the United Nations and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).
Within the context of the PGDP, it was critical to use gender analysis as a means of acquiring an
understanding of skills level available in the province, arrive at a common understanding of the
gender concerns and to start growing a critical mass of people who could engage with and interlink
gender mainstreaming processes and the PGDP.
Gender analysis needs to be integrated into every phase of the PGDP, this could for example include,
contextualisation, programming, identification, assessment, formulation, financing, implementation
and evaluation. Where a particular phase had already been accomplished, it was important to reflect
on gendering processes or indeed the lack of gendering processes and draw lessons that could lead to
clearly defined actions at a later stage.
In support of gender analysis processes, the Diouf/DeWaal Gender Practitioner Support Model
(GPSM) has been used as a means of capacity building for gender mainstreaming. This model builds
on gender practitioner understanding of gender theory and gender analysis, assists with
implementation and review/evaluation processes, within a supported and mentored environment.
Because many gender development practitioners find themselves having to engage with
implementation strategies with limited gender knowledge, inadequate support mechanisms and
inappropriate gender instruments, focus tends to be on single action gender-tasking in an attempt to
deliver gender responsive outcomes. This approach leads to gender dilution, where in the interest of
limited time, limited personnel and limited budget, the cross cutting issues of women, youth, children,
disability and HIV/AIDS are bundled together at the strategic level; leading to limited impact at the
level of implementation. This is certainly true of gendering processes in government departments and
generally within the PGDP. A more holistic approach is required if sustainable gender development is
to be achieved.
The three-phased approach (see Appendix 1) of the Gender Practitioners Support Model (GPSM)
provides access to theory, implementation and review mechanisms to both desk-based and field-based
gender practitioners; supports entry at any stage and supports an holistic approach to gendered
development. The D/D GPSM was in fact arose through support to personnel who without any formal
gender training, were given gender as a core responsibility and were expected to deliver gender
responsive programmes.
Using the recognised Gender Analysis Frameworks (Harvard, Moser and Longwe) and the D/D
GPSM, within the very limited time frame of three months, the methodology provided direction and
support to a number of people who engaged with mainstreaming gender into the PGDP.
The process of mainstreaming gender into the PGDP encountered immediate time constraints because
discussions regarding the "way forward" coincided with the Medium Term Economic Framework
(MTEF) budget hearings, draft proposals for the short and medium term PGDP programmes/projects,
the monitoring and evaluation (M&E) proposed strategy, evolving capacity building and
communications strategies, institutional arrangements for the PGDP, Sixteen Days of Activism and
reporting on the SADC Gender Commitments. This all while the most important stakeholders; namely
the OSW and the Gender Focal Points (GFPs) of each government department were engaging with the
broader context of the PGDP and ways that it could impact on the gender work that was unfolding in
the province.
The workplan therefor focussed on key initiatives and interventions that supported a number of entry
points into the PGDP process. Table 1 details the eight initiatives that would be the focus of gender
mainstreaming from the period September to December 2003.
Support Initiative 1: Develop gender sensitive departmental plans October 2003, ongoing
• Departmental plans read and evaluated regarding level of gender
sensitivity; recommendations made
• Present a ten point plan that would assist managers responsible for
developing plans to gender programmes
• Recommendations fed back to departmental Head of Department (HOD)
and senior mangers with key responsibilities for generating strategic plans
• Hold contact meetings with HODs and senior managers to offer further
support
Support Initiative 3: Capacity building of GFPs regarding the PGDP Gendering Workshop 28&29
• 2-day workshop with GFPs to raise awareness of PGDP process and ways October , ongoing
of mainstreaming gender into the process
• Engage with PGDP framework document at strategic and operational levels
• Share instruments of gender budgeting; gender policy, gender programmes
and projects
Support Initiative 6: Gender advocacy mainstreamed into PGDP advocacy October 2003, ongoing
• Ensure that the PGDP communications strategy has a clear gender focus on
a range of levels eg. Materials, consultations, participatory meetings
• Liaise with and provide support to PMU managers in ensuring that gender
sensitive policies and strategies are evident in M&E; as well as in final
departmental operational plans
Each of these initiatives posed significant challenges that required strategic thinking, innovation and
energy; there was however incredible support and enthusiasm of many stakeholders. Progress to date
and specific recommendations are detailed in the next section of this document.
3.1
By actively engaging with the content and modus operandi of departmental strategic plans, a
movement away from operational and activity-based inputs was envisaged where senior management
of relevant departments would engage with gender strategy. This would however require the
participation of senior management in gender discussion and debate at the strategic level, they would
need to be consulted on gender planning, gender budgets and time frames, gender monitoring; as well
as inter-departmental gender strategy.
• Departmental strategic plans were read and analysed; this analysis focussed on both the
quantitative and qualitative aspects of gender
• Recommendations that would increase the level of gender awareness, impacting on operations,
were made to relevant personnel
• Follow up meetings with senior management of the relevant departments assisted in
developing a common understanding of the process of gendering strategic plans
As can be expected, the level of interaction and engagement with departments varied considerably
with some departments being quite welcoming of gender recommendations and others not quite ready
to engage at the level of recommendations. The willingness to engage with gender recommendations
at the level of the strategic plan must also be understood against the background of Gender Focal
Points (GFPs) who are not part of senior management3, as well as the time constraints experienced in
terms of departments preparations of plans and budgets in accordance with the Medium Term
Economic Framework (MTEF) budget hearings. Table 2.1 details challenges and strengths
experienced during the process of developing gender sensitive department plans.
Table 2.1 Developing Gender Sensitive Departmental Plans - Challenges and Strengths
Initiative Actions Challenges Strengths
Develop gender Plans read and • Plans difficult to access • Plans made mention of
sensitive departmental analysed from relevant departments gender and women's issues;
strategic plans • Plans accessed were often this showed a reasonable
outdated versions; latest level of gender sensitivity
electronic version not and awareness
generally known • Where senior management
• Gender concepts linked knew that plans were being
with youth, disabled, analysed, feedback was
children, HIV/AIDS requested and even
• Gender not mainstreamed; welcomed
3
Most GFPs are low ranking officials who have never been part of strategic planning and are themselves not skilled enough to provide
adequate guidance on gendering strategic plans
In the reading and analysing departmental plans, the GFPs were key stakeholders in assisting with the
process. Once they had been trained in gender analysis and fully understood the strategic objectives of
the PGDP; they could make the connection between gender mainstreaming and the broader PGDP,
and were able to analyse their own departmental strategic plans. Table 2.2 details progress to date
regarding gender analysis of departmental plans. Appendices 2 and 3 are examples of Quantitative
and Qualitative Analysis of DOH and Treasury prepared by GFPs of the specified departments.
Emerging from the gender analysis process, recommendations that support a raised level of gender
awareness and sensitivity can be developed. Appendices 4, 5 and 6 are examples of gender
recommendations that were developed for DEAET, DOH and DRPW.
It is important to note that while many departmental strategic plans have been read and analysed, and
recommendations developed; many of these have not been fed back to senior management of relevant
departments. Once again this must be understood in the context of the time constraints of the MTEF
and the GFPs who are not part of senior management and therefor have difficulty in engaging with the
process of developing a strategic plan.
Time constraints allowed the reading, analysis and recommendations of only fifteen departmental
plans; many of the departments that have national competency require a different level of analysis and
recommendations. These will need to be followed up over the next few months.
The value of meetings with senior management of relevant departments to discuss the gendering
process cannot be overemphasised, as this assists with narrowing the gap between policy and strategic
frameworks and implementation processes. Where the GFP requested additional support, the
Table 2.3 Developing Gender Sensitive Departmental Plans - Recommendations for the way forward
Initiative Actions Recommendations for the way forward
Gender sensitive Plans read and The following departmental plans should be read and analysed
departmental strategic analysed using the quantitative and qualitative instrument:
plans • ICD
• Correctional Services
• Office of the Premier
• Justice
• GCIS
• Labour
Recommendations Recommendations should be made available to relevant
made to relevant departments, always supporting the SPU and GFP:
department • Correctional Services
• Economic Affairs, Environment and Tourism
• Education
• GCIS
• ICD
• Justice
• Labour
• Land Affairs
• Land Claims Commission
• Office of the Premier
• Safety and Liaison
• South African Police Service
• Transport
Meetings with relevant Meeting should be held with senior managers of the following
department departments to discuss both the analysis and recommendations:
• Correctional Services
• Economic Affairs, Environment and Tourism
• Education
• GCIS
• ICD
• Justice
• Labour
• Land Affairs
• Land Claims Commission
• Office of the Premier
• Safety and Liaison
• South African Police Service
• Transport
While institutions often call for the participation of women and advocates of gender, it is important
that gendering processes guard against simply "making up the numbers" or "ticking the stakeholder
checklist". Too often marginalised groups participate with no voice. Gendering the PGDP process
requires that both participation and a gender voice are available at institutional gatherings. Where
there is participation, there is greater certainty that gender would be placed on the agenda. Over the
time period September to December 2003, the PGDP reference group meetings, budget hearings and
PGDP working groups were targeted as strategic institutional processes to support gender advocacy.
It should be noted that these institutional processes were open to participation of those that would
advocate for the women's and gender issues; along with youth, the disabled and HIV/AIDS, the
crosscutting issues always find space on agenda. There is undoubtedly a political willingness to ensure
that marginalised groups are accommodated and supported within the broad activities of the PGDP.
Participation, reports and recommendations are welcomed; and though this does not necessarily
support mainstreaming processes, it is certainly an important step in ensuring that gender issues and
concerns become part of the agenda4.
Table 3.1 details some of the challenges experienced in ensuring that both gender participation and
gender voice was possible within the context of institutional processes. Here a key concern is the lack
of capacity experienced; the OSW can only be in a limited amount of places at any given moment, so
while they often receive invitations to participate, participation is ultimately not possible.
Despite the lack of human resource capacity and the inability to attend any of the working group
meetings; participation in the extended reference group meeting and budget hearings was undertaken.
Table 3.2 details progress to date regarding gender advocacy to institutions. The presence of a gender
voice certainly lead to even greater awareness of the need to engage more at the level of strategy,
planning and budgeting. As a result of gender participation in the budget hearings, certain departments
received letters from Treasury noting the recommendations to the departments for gendering
department strategic plans.
The key to growing the critical mass of action for gender transformation is to ensure that gender is so
effectively mainstreamed into any gathering, programme or activity that it's absence from an agenda
will be considered a shortcoming of the agenda. Table 3.3 details recommendations regarding gender
advocacy to institutions if both gender participation and a gender voice is to be a tangible presence at
PGDP institutional gatherings.
Mainstreaming Gender into the PGDP 26
ID Development Consultancy/The Institute of Women’s and Gender Studies
United Nations Development Programme
Table 3.3 Gender Advocacy to Institutions - Recommendations for the way forward
Initiative Actions Recommendations
Gender advocacy to Raise awareness of • The extended reference group meetings is an important
institutions gender at PGDP platform for engaging with other provincial stakeholders;
reference group attendance by the women's lobby at meetings is imperative
meetings • A written, tabled report on gender and the PGDP is desirable
at each extended reference group meeting
• Formal meetings should be held with chairpersons of each of
the working groups as a means of increasing the support base
to gendering processes
• Key partnerships need to be forged with a range of institutions
and individuals that form part of the reference group, ensuring
effective participation and an increased voice
Attend Budget • Attendance at all budget hearings is critical as a means of
Hearings ensuring that gender is considered at the strategic planning
and budgeting level
• Reports detailing the level of gender responsiveness of the
strategic plans should be made available to both departments
and the chairperson of the hearings
• Key partnerships need to be forged with a range of gender
based organisations who are able to engage with gender
issues, ensuring participation and voice
Attend working group • Participation in all working groups is vital in ensuring that
meetings gender is considered at every level of implementation
• A written, tabled report on gender and the PGDP is desirable
at each working group meeting
• Key partnerships need to be forged with a range of institutions
who are able to engage with gender issues, ensuring
participation and voice
The OSW and Special Programme Units (SPUs) are key stakeholders in the process of mainstreaming
gender; as a group, they are constantly engaging with gender theoretical and implementation issues.
Within the context of the PGDP, it was therefor imperative that they engage with the PGDP
framework on both strategic and operational levels as a way of ensuring that gendered departmental
strategic plans are developed. A gendered departmental strategic plan in turn creates the basis for
gendered programming, identification, assessment, formulation, financing, implementation and
evaluation.
A two-day workshop for Gender Focal Points (GFPs) was held on 28 -29 October to discuss ways of
mainstreaming gender into the PGDP. The workshop programme (see Appendix 7) gave GFPs the
opportunity to understand the strategic objectives of the PGDP, the role of a departmental strategic
plan in the policy and project cycles, gender analysis frameworks, and mainstreaming gender into the
PGDP. A second review workshop was held late November to evaluate progress and to discuss the
way forward (see Appendices 8 and 9) for gendering the PGDP.
Table 4.1 details the challenges and strengths encountered in raising awareness of the PGDP process.
It is important to note that most of the GFPs had not been part of departmental strategic planning
sessions, and therefor had limited knowledge of the policy, planning and budgetary processes. As
lower ranking officials they engage at the level of operations rather than strategic planning - ironically
they sometimes use the term "gender events managers" to describe their work. There is a significant
challenge facing senior management regarding the role of GFPs if departments are going to able to
access the gender knowledge and skills available, and close the gap between policy and
implementation.
Table 4.1 Awareness raising of the PGDP with GFPs - Challenges and Strengths
Initiative Actions Challenges Strengths
PGDP awareness Hold capacity building • Lack of participation of • Enthusiasm and
raising with GFPs workshops personnel not authorised to willingness of GFPs and
attend the PGDP workshop SPUs to engage with
• Lack of participation of PGDP process
certain departments who • Support provided from
did not respond to the PGDP PMU in the form of
invitation logistics and content
• Variation in ability of • Successes in analysis and
GFPs to access recommendations of
departmental strategic strategic plans
plans, and therefor to
engage with the process
• Lack of clarity regarding
roles and responsibilities
affected ability of the OSW
Table 4.2 details progress to date in raising awareness of the PGDP process with the GFPs, and the
associated actions to mainstream gender. In support of the GPSM and its methodology, a mentorship
process followed the PGDP workshop and focussed in particular on providing support to analyse the
departmental strategic plan, prepare recommendations on gendering the strategic plan; as well as
preparation for presentations of these to senior management. Where GFPs made use of the support
process, they were significantly more successful than those GFPs who liased with senior management
without the relevant, supporting documentation. It is important to note that where GFPs presented
written recommendations, they were then invited to do a more formal presentation to senior
management teams. The time constraints experienced were limiting for both GFPs and senior
managers in budget preparations for the MTEF hearings; there have however been significant
successes in getting senior managers and GFPs to engage with each other in the gendering of strategic
processes within their departments. Quite a few GFPs have reported that they have been requested to
participate in strategic planning sessions.
Table 4.2 Awareness raising of the PGDP with GFPs - Progress to Date
Initiative Actions Progress to date
PGDP awareness Hold capacity building • successful 2 day workshop held to share ways of
raising with GFPs workshops mainstreaming gender into the PGDP and to discuss training
needs as a part of training strategies; 12 departments
represented at the workshop
• a review workshop held to update and evaluate gendering
processes; 10 departments represented at workshop
Support meetings for Support meetings have been held with a number of departments
GFPs and SPUs with a particular focus on:
• preparation of gender analysis and gender recommendations
documentation
• preparations for meetings with senior management to discuss
gendering the PGDP and departmental strategic plans
• dealing with specific challenges regarding the role and
responsibility of a SPU
There are significant challenges experienced by GFPs; including the manner in which their role is
understood by senior management, the OSW and other stakeholders. Many GFPs do not come to the
job by choice, but as a result of transformation processes and restructuring, or as a means of getting to
a more senior level in government. The turnover of GFPs is high, they are overworked and
undervalued; they are expected to engage with processes, like equity plans, over which they ultimately
have very little control and often experience gender insensitivity first hand.
Despite these challenges, the role and responsibility of the GFP is key in linking the objectives of the
provincial government with local government and local communities. The role of the GFP is key in
closing the gap between policy and implementation, theory and practice; the PGDP process will be
increasingly gender responsive if the OSW and GFPs are able to operate at a more strategic level.
Table 4.3 details recommendations for continuous awareness raising and capacity building of GFPs in
support of the PGDP. Some of the recommendations made by GFPs in support of gender
mainstreaming include team building with the OSW, joint strategic planning sessions with key
stakeholders, training in gender budgeting processes and gender responsive monitoring and
evaluation.
Gender programmes face a number of challenges in terms of design, target audience, content,
implementation and evaluation. While some of the challenges are related to the WID or GAD
approach of the trainer and course programme, a notable challenge is the way in which the target
audience perceives gender programmes. For many people, a gender programme is "something for
women, facilitated by women". It is therefor not unusual for women to be nominated to attend gender
training; or for women to be appointed as GFPs (unless the sector has a greater perceived male focus,
for example finance and the police); or for women to provide inputs for women's celebrations (for
example Women's Day and Women Farmer of the Year). Often a women's event or project becomes
the only intervention that a government department engages with, citing "this will be very good for the
women to know their rights". Those rights are however perceived as rights well outside the lives of the
women within the work place.
All of the above impact on the design and facilitation of gender training programmes, as well as the
ability to mainstream gender within both public and private sector organisations. Because men
dominate senior management, and gender training programmes is "something for women, facilitated
by women", it is not given priority in terms of departmental strategy. Subsequently gender training is
accorded limited budget and human resources. Table 5.1 details the challenges experienced in the
assessment and development of gender training programmes within the province.
GFPs have participated in two exercises focussing on training needs relating to gender mainstreaming.
It is important to note that recommendations focussed not only on their training needs, but also the
gender training needs of senior and middle management with particular focus on mainstreaming
processes in support of the PGDP. Training needs include gender planning and budgeting, fiscal
management skills, as well as gender analysis with a specific focus on the use of disaggregated data.
Appendix 9, is an extract from the minutes of the PGDP workshop and details recommendations that
need to be considered when developing a gender training strategy.
A time constraint was a key factor in the lack of progress relating to this support initiative; still a
number of objectives have either been achieved or are in progress as detailed in Table 5.2.
Mainstreaming gender into the PGDP has a distinct training component, where the specific content of
the PGDP is linked to specific content of gender analysis and gender empowerment strategies. It will
become increasingly important that training needs provincially become more integrated across sectors
so that the core objectives of the PGDP lead to integrated strategic planning and joint operational
activities. Gender theory and analysis is an integral aspect of such training if the goals of the PGDP
are to be realised. Table 5.3 detail recommendations that will support gender mainstreaming processes
into the general training needs of the province.
The ideal case scenario for mainstreaming gender into the PGDP would have been to ensure that one
of the management positions in the PMU was a gender development position. This would have
supported the internal and eternal processes at every level from policy to implementation; as well as
strategic planning. The institutional arrangements of the PMU were a male director, four male
managers and one male finance manager, while the two office administrators and office assistant were
female. Most of the consultants and service providers engaged to date have also been male. While the
male colleagues were open and even welcoming of the gender issue, this situation itself was not going
to be conducive to gender being mainstreamed into the PGDP.
This initiative was therefor focussed on getting the PMU more acquainted with gender theory and
analysis, so that in the event of the OSW not being present and participating in PGDP processes the
male colleagues would be the gender eye/gender lens. Table 6.1 detail challenges and strengths
encountered in providing gender support and training to members of the PMU. Once again time
constraints resulted in not being able to get the entire PMU together at any one time for a joint gender
training session, individual managers however engaged with gender processes and the feedback is that
the increased presence of women through meetings with GFPs at the PMU office has assisted with the
gender mainstreaming process.
Table 6.1 Gender Support and Training to the PGDP PMU - Challenges and Strengths
Initiative Actions Challenges Strengths
Gender support and Gender support and • Difficulty in tracking • Political will and support
training to the PGDP training to managers PGDP processes and draft from provincial
PMU and consultants versions because of rapid government senior
changes to documentation management for women's
• Constant liaising with key and gender issues
managers of programmes, • Willingness of PGDP PMU
M&E, communications, managers to engage with
logistics; as well as the gender issues
consultants
• Time constraints that
limited participation at
each stage of a process;
inevitably gender drops off
the agenda
• Working within the tight
budget cycle time frames
• Lack of human resource
capacity and therefore
inability to participate in all
consultative activities
Progress to date as detailed in Table 6.2, has focussed on support to individual managers in the areas
of designing future programmes and projects, the monitoring and evaluation strategy and the
communications strategy. Discussions have also taken place with the range of consultants who have
engaged with PGDP development initiatives over the reported period. A series of meetings with GFPs
have taken place at the PMU offices that created a sense of connection between the PMU and
departments.
Table 6.2 Gender Support and Training to the PGDP PMU - Progress to Date
Initiative Actions Progress to date
Gender support and Gender support and • Support and advice to manager working with the development
training to the PGDP training to managers of Flagship Programme/Projects
PMU and consultants • Support and advice to manager working with the development
of medium term programmes/projects
• Participation in M&E workshop and working group; advice
regarding strategy
• Participation in communications strategy; gender analysis of
communications and recommendations to gender future
strategies
• Participation in capacity building research and process
Continued support to managers and consultants who engage with the PGDP processes is vital in the
effort to ensure that gender remains on the agenda. Further recommendations detailed in Table 6.3
will ensure that the strategic developments facilitated by the PMU will link more directly to the
gendering processes that will take place in departments, local government and beneficiary
communities of the PGDP.
Table 6.3 Gender Support and Training to the PGDP PMU - Recommendations
Initiative Actions Recommendations
Gender support and Gender support and • Continued support to managers and consultants to ensure that
training to the PGDP training to managers gender remains part of the agenda at both strategic and
PMU and consultants operational levels
• The inclusion of a gender position into the PMU over the next
few months
• Encouragement to PMU members to increasingly act as the
gender eye/gender lens through all PGDP processes
Since the launch of the PGDP Strategy Framework for Growth and Development in June 2003,
extensive consultations have continued between the provincial government, public entities, business,
labour and civil society in preparation for the implementation of flagship, medium and long term
programmes and projects. This in itself necessitates a high level of advocacy and awareness raising
around the strategic objectives of the PGDP.
Part of the gender mainstreaming process is ensuring that all processes adopt gender responsive
mechanisms, as well as usage of the necessary tools and instruments to check progress. By
mainstreaming gender advocacy into PGDP advocacy, it is envisaged that gender will become less of
an activity and more part of the transformation process that the PGDP will support in terms of gender
equality within the province. Any transformation process creates a series of tensions within personal
and working relationships; this is to be expected in mainstreaming gender and PGDP advocacy. Table
7.1 details some of the challenges, as well as strengths experienced in the process of mainstreaming
gender advocacy into PGDP advocacy.
Table 7.1 Gender advocacy mainstreamed into PGDP advocacy - Challenges and Strengths
Initiative Actions Challenges Strengths
Gender advocacy Link gender advocacy • Difficulty in tracking • Political will and support
mainstreamed into to PGDP strategies and PGDP processes and draft from provincial
PGDP advocacy advocacy versions because of rapid government senior
changes to documentation management for women's
• Constant liaising with key and gender issues
managers of programmes, • Willingness of PGDP PMU
M&E, communications, managers to engage with
logistics; as well as the gender issues
consultants • Support provided to
• Time constraints that women who have become
limited participation at associated with the team
each stage of a process;
inevitably gender drops off
the agenda
• Working within the tight
budget cycle time frames
• Lack of human resource
capacity and therefore
inability to participate in all
consultative activities
It should be noted that there was never really a problem in getting a gender voice heard, inputs were
always sought and welcomed. Table 7.2 details progress to date. What will however remain more
problematic is what happens to gender information, recommendations and the resulting actions - these
are far more difficult for institutions and individual people to work with. What often happens is that
gender is the either diluted, for example merely seen as one of the cross cutting issues together with
youth, children, the disabled and HIV/AIDS; or gender is given the status of a task that needs to be
accomplished, for example a women's focus project.
Table 7.2 Gender advocacy mainstreamed into PGDP advocacy - Progress to Date
Initiative Actions Progress to date
Gender advocacy Link gender advocacy • Support and advice provided to the Flagship
mainstreamed into to PGDP strategies and Programme/Projects
PGDP advocacy advocacy • Support and advice to development of medium term
programmes/projects
• Participation in M&E workshop and working group; advice
regarding strategy
• Participation in communications strategy
• Participation in capacity building research and process
The recommendations that will support gender mainstreaming into PGDP mainstreaming, as detailed
in Table 7.3, include a focus on the M&E, communication and capacity building strategies, where it is
critical that the participation of women is not the end point, but rather participation with a voice that is
heard, as well as support for gender action during the implementation phase.
The original idea of forming a working group that could actively engage with the processes of
developing and extending gender policies in the Eastern Cape Province, arose from informal
discussions between the OSW and UNDP. It was envisaged that such a structure could also advise and
support existing structures like the OSW and other gender based organisations in achieving the South
African vision of gender equality. Within the context of the PGDP, this advisory, support structure
would play an essential in the gender mainstreaming process. Table 8.1 details some of the challenges
and strengths encountered in the formation of a gender Think-Tank.
At the first meeting of the Think-Tank, (refer to Table 8.2) which included representation from the
OSW, UNDP, government, private sector, tertiary institutions and civil society; the institutional
arrangements and Terms of Reference was discussed, specifically because the constitution of such a
group is always open to criticism regarding its objectives, mandate, duration, participation and
purpose. Additionally, because time, logistical and geographical constraints place enormous pressure
on the ability of the group to function well, the objectives of the group needed to be clear and
transparent. Appendix 11 details revised Terms of Reference for the group.
In it's infancy stage the Think-Tank needs to be nurtured and supported so that it becomes a structure
that is able to advise and support mainstreaming of gender into the PGDP. Table 8.3 details
recommendations that the group might wish to consider as it works towards the achievement of it's
Terms of Reference.
Through the months September to December 2003, and in a final round of interviews in December,
a range of persons were asked to share their thoughts on mainstreaming gender into the PGDP,
focussing specifically on medium and long term requirements. Time and geographical constraints
meant that interactions were focussed on the following groups of people:
A multitude of ideas have been generated, and these would need greater consideration as in-depth
preparations are undertaken for launching the Flagship Projects, and as the medium and long terms
programmes and projects are put in place. These suggestions have been categorised into six main
areas:
• Strategic Planning
• Institutional Arrangements
• Monitoring and Evaluation
• Stakeholder Base
• Training Needs
• Communications
As with the specific recommendations relating to the Support Initiatives, these should form the
basis of further discussion to mainstream gender into the implementation phase of the PGDP.
Please note that neither the categories nor individual recommendations are listed in any order of
priority. Some of these recommendations are repetitions of earlier specific recommendation that
relate to the Support Initiatives; however as they arose from interviews and final discussions with
the stakeholders, for the sake of clarity they have been recorded again.
national mandate, and needs to be supported in forming effective partnerships to align itself more
strategically to the PGDP.
into all areas of strategic, business and operational plans, including planning, budgeting, human
resources and projects.
4.6 Communications
meets the requirements of gendered communications. Provincial gender machinery could advise on
both print and electronic materials.
Conclusion
The process of mainstreaming gender into the PGDP during the months September to December
2003 was only travelling part of a journey; and for those who engaged with the process of it meant
self-discovery and awareness arising, innovation and sharing, learning and developing ways of
working in support of a strategy that sets out a provincial vision, targets and programmes aimed at
economic growth, employment creation, poverty eradication and income distribution, targeting a
rapid improvement in the quality of life of the poorest people in the province. It was a time to look
back and acknowledge those achievements of the gender pioneers, as well as engage with strategy,
planning and implementation processes. It was also a time to feel the strength and commitment of a
province that is willing to commit itself to a guiding principle for gender equality:
"We commit ourselves to ensure that at all stages of planning, designing, implementation,
monitoring and evaluation of the PGDP, gender perspectives will be mainstreamed so as to
ensure the development of gender responsive programmes.5"
5
PGDP Strategy Framework for Growth and Development 2004-2014, Section 5
Appendix 1: Diouf/DeWaal Gender Practitioner's Support Model (GPSM) (Not For Publishing. Not For Distribution)
Key objective of D/D GPSM: To support and mentor gender practitioners through engendered development processes
PHASE 2
MENTORED IMPLEMENTATION
10 POINT PLAN
PHASE 1 _ Gendered policies and guidelines PHASE 3
THEORETICAL SUPPORT _ Gendered strategic frameworks REVIEW SUPPORT
_ Gendered budgets
_ Gender theory _ Gendered planning _ Gender theory
_ Gender language _ Gender sensitive community _ Gender analysis
_ Gender tools/instruments support _ Review development strategy
_ Gender analysis _ Gendered project support _ Review group strategy
_ Development strategy _ Gender disaggregated data _ Review personal contract
_ Group strategy _ Gendered reporting mechanisms _ Redefine strategy
_ Personal contract _ Gendered monitoring and
evaluation
_ Gendered review mechanisms
Prepared by:
Ms K. Mjamba
Special Programmes Unit Official
Department of Health
Eastern Cape Province
Compiled by:
Mr Bandile Sijadu
Assistant Manager, SPU
MAINSTREAMING GENDER INTO THE PROVINCIAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PGDP)
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
GENDER RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENTAL STRATEGIC PLAN
Background Information:
Government has committed itself to promote gender equality. It has established gender machinery in the form of the Office on the Status of Women (OSW) and Gender Focal
Points. These have been established to support and monitor government's efforts to promote gender equality. However, responsibilities for implementation lie not with these units,
but with senior management government. This is in accordance with the principle of `gender mainstreaming`, which is an effective methodology for addressing gender inequality.
As gender inequities have an impact on quality and efficiency of the mainstream of internal and programming activities of the department, it is best to start by mainstreaming gender
into strategic plans, as these guidelines will be translated into programmes and business plans of the department.
The aim of this exercise is to find ways of ensuring that the process of transforming the gender related guidelines of the strategy plans translate into realistic operational plans and
business plans. These recommendations are intended to assist programme managers to be able to mainstream gender into their plans as these plans feed into the PGDP.
Pg Mention Section Recommendations
1 Women Overview of MEC A sentence that focus on women, youth, children and disabled to be built in
16 Gender dimension General comments on 2nd bullet add the sentence- `could be partly attributed to gender dimensions of reproductive health`
maternal deaths
31 Women Priorities for 2004/2005 6th bullet add- ` with special focus on the most vulnerable such as women, youth , disabled and children
32 Employment Equity Act and Legislative Framework Add to legislation's
S.A. National Policy
Framework for Women's
Empowerment and Gender
Equality
33 Women Conclusion 3rd paragraph 1st sentence add `and the vulnerable groups such as women, youth, children and disabled.
37 Disaggregated data in terms of Table no.8 Posts filled to be captured in terms of females, males and racial group
senior management post – male,
females,race
80 gender Quality improvement Last bullet could read `To develop strategies that are gender responsive`.
measures HIV/AIDS
96 Gender sensitive Effective efficient Additional bullet could read - `ensuring equal rights and opportunities for both women and men in the
Management structure institution`.
96 Gender Strategic goals 2004-7 (d) last bullet …..gender mainstreaming occurs in all policies , structures and programmes
77 Gender Challenges related to Add another bullet suggested ` Gender dimensions of vulnerability to HIV: The fact that people are called upon to
HIV/AIDS Programme use condoms or to be faithful without challenging women's lesser power to negotiate sexual behaviour`.
Prepared by:
Ms K. Mjamba
Special Programmes Unit Official
Appendix 7: OSW/ GFP’S PGDP WORKSHOP PROGRAMME: HALYARDS HOTEL: PORT ALFRED – 28 – 29 OCTOBER 2003
DAY I
TIME SESSION DETAIL LEAD PERSON(S)
09h00 Welcome, background, aims and objectives of the workshop Zukelwa Mlakalaka
09h10 Introductions • United Nations Development Programme - Janet Macharia
• Office on the Status of Women - Zukelwa Mlakalaka
• Institute for Women's and Gender Studies/IDDC - Imelda Diouf
• PGDP Project Management Unit - John Reynolds
• Economic Growth and Development Working Group Ms Giwu, Ms Mvusi, Ms Ndaki,
• Governance Working Group - Ms Boqwana, Mr Manyaku, Ms Blaai, Ms Somfongo
• Fiscal Working Group - Ms Tunyiswa, Mr Sijadu,
• Social Needs Working Group - Ms Dunjana, Ms Mjamba, Ms Fanta, Ms Casoojee
09h25 Presentation of PGDP Strategic Framework for Growth and Development John Reynolds
2004-2014 by Project Management Unit (PMU)
10h00 Questions/Comments All
10h45 Tea Break
11h00 Mainstreaming gender into government programmes and processes Janet Macharia / Imelda Diouf
• Legislation and Policy
• Operations and Implementation
• Social Needs
15h45 Report Back and Discussion Cluster working group report back
Gendering Working Groups - policies, strategic guidelines, strategic Janet Macharia/Imelda Diouf
operations, activities
Diouf/DeWaal Gender Practitioner's Support Model (GPSM)
Theoretical support
Mentored Implementation
Review support
Implementing Support Models All - discussion and sharing
16h45 Overnight reading - to be allocated
17h00 End of Day
DAY II
TIME ITEM RESPONSIBLE PERSON
08h30 Review of Day 1 All
09h00 Developing personal, departmental and cluster group implementing Cluster working group meetings
strategies - Working Groups: • Economic Growth and Development Working Group - Ms Giwu, Ms Mvusi, Ms Ndaki,
• Governance • Governance Working Group - Ms Boqwana, Mr Manyaku, Ms Blaai, Ms Somfongo
• Economic Growth and Development • Fiscal Working Group - Ms Tunyiswa, Mr Sijadu,
• Fiscal • Social Needs Working Group - Ms Dunjana, Ms Mjamba, Ms Fanta, Ms Casoojee
• Social Needs
11h15 Tea Break
11h30 Cluster Report Back and Discussion Cluster working group report back
Gendering Departmental PGDP Strategies - policies, strategic guidelines, Janet Macharia/Imelda Diouf
strategic operations, activities
PGDP - linking theory and practice, strategic liaisons
13h00 Lunch
14h00 Training Needs of Gender Focal Points All
15h00 Way forward All
15h15 Tea and Departure
Participating Organisations:
UNDP
OSW
IDDC/Institute of Women’s and Gender Studies
Department of Agriculture
Department of Correctional Services
Department of Economic Affairs, Environment and Tourism
Department of Education
Department of Health
Department of Housing, Local Government and Traditional Affairs
Department of Land Affairs
Department of Roads and Public Works
Department of Safety, Security and Liaison
Department of Social Development
Department of Sports, Recreation, Arts and Culture
Department of Transport
Department of Treasury
Department of Water Affairs
South African Police Service
Objectives:
◘ To share progress regarding the gendering of the departmental strategic plans
◘ To find ways of ensuring that the process of transforming the gender guidelines of the strategy plans
translate into realistic operational and business plans
◘ To look at the programme/project short and medium term priorities of the PGDP
◘ To review the training needs strategy and discuss a way forward
◘ To provide an update on the Eastern Cape Gender Think-Tank
Meeting Agenda:
09h00 Welcome
Objectives
09h15 Report back from each department regarding gender mainstreaming intervention
(each department will get a 5 minute slot to do a report back)
Departmental strategic plans into business/operational plans – discussion and
recommendations Implications for mainstreaming gender – the way forward
10h45 Tea
12h15 Evaluation
Conclusion
Mainstreaming Gender into the Provincial Growth and Development Plan (PGDP) 2004-2014
GFP/SPU Meeting
Date: 21 November 2003
Venue: State House, Bisho
Time: 09h00-13h00
1. Report back and sharing of experiences regarding gendering of departmental strategic plans
Discussion took place regarding the value of the hearings and possible role of GFPs
and SPUs
Recommendations:
Discussion and presentation took place regarding partnerships and allies to support
the processes of gendering departmental strategies and the PGDP
Focus on the circle of concern and place one's own capacity within a realistic context
Look towards the circle of influence to bring on board allies and partners both within
and outside of a specific department
Grow the circle of influence by forming partners with those who exist outside of
government structures eg CBOs, NGOs, churches, etc
What are the training needs of GFPs (check page 29 &45 of gender policy framework) and other
members of government departments?
Gender disaggregated
• how to interpret?
• analyse?
Stress management
Gender strategy
• skills, how to deal with diversity management
• how to work with people from diverse cultures and social backgrounds
• change management(include gender perspective)
• IT skills and presentation skills; e-mails, software, MIS
The Think Tank will serve as an advisory thinking group to give support to the OSW in Eastern
Cape, in its efforts aimed at ensuring that the PGDP processes from design, planning,
implementation and monitoring are gender responsive.
.
Membership
The team is composed of women and men from the Eastern Cape who have expertise in gender and
development issues. They are drawn from government, private sector, statutory bodies, NGOs,
organised labour, universities and relevant donor agencies.
When the need arises, the Think Tank may call upon certain experts to advise on certain policy
issues.
The membership of the think tank and objectives of the group ought to be reviewed once a year.
General objectives:
1. To provide guidance on the alignment of the OSW provincial gender policy with the
strategic objectives of the PGDP
2. To bring to the PGDP process the extensive resources, knowledge and expertise on gender
generally, and in particular gender and development issues pertaining to the Eastern Cape
3. Exchange and share national, regional and international developments on gender for input
into the PGDP implementation processes
4. To advise on research priorities on gender mainstreaming for the Eastern Cape.
5. To advise on lobbying and advocacy strategies and opportunities for effective and
responsive gender mainstreaming
6. Supporting and Advising the Eastern Cape OSW
7. To advise the OSW on avenues of sharing and networking with stakeholders
8. To advise the OSW on issues of integration and co-operation between the OSW and other
stakeholders.
9. To advise on the repackaging of information in accessible formats
10. To advise the OSW on resource mobilisation
11. To act as a reference group in programme/project evaluation when requested by the OSW
12. To advise on sustainable gender mainstreaming strategies
Duration/Venue
The Think Tank will need to meet every month for the first six months. Thereafter the TT will
meet once every three months.
The venue will remain East London unless otherwise agreed upon
Logistics:
The OSW will endeavour to cater for the logistics of the Think Tank meetings
Appendix 12
1. Background
On June 26 2003, the Premier of the Eastern Cape launched the Province’s framework for the
development of the Provincial Growth Development Plan for the period 2004-2014. One of the
guiding principles of the framework is to ensures that all stages of the development,
implementation and monitoring of the PGDP’s programmes gender concerns will be cross cutting
for effective gender responsive targeting and planning.
UNDP in support to ensuring that gender is fully mainstreamed into the PGDP, wishes to recruit a
gender expert on a consultancy basis, to work closely with the UNDP SURF Gender Specialist, the
Provincial Office of the Status of Women and the Programme Management Unit based in Bisho,
Eastern Cape. The Consultant will also have continuous liaison with the already formed groups
that are working on the three thematic areas of the PGDP framework, liaison with the different
provincial departments and other stakeholders i.e. NGOs, private sector as will be identified by the
OSW.
2. Objectives
The overall objective is to ensure that the PGDP is not only gender sensitive but will form the basis
for the development of gender responsive programmes.
Specific objectives
Under take a thorough gender analysis of the PGDP thematic areas as stated in the
framework - (taking into account the paucity in Sex disaggregated data) – and inter alia
elucidate existing social and gender justice concerns and provide suggested indicators for
tracking progress.
Develop a Gender Impact Assessment of PGDP to highlight the potential negative
consequences of the Plan and how these can be balanced against any potential positive
gains in support of a correct course of action.
Undertake a critical gender analysis of the provincial departmental policies on gender
issues with a view to making recommendation on how to best engender the policies
Undertake a quick but representative survey to assess the actual status of women and men
in Eastern Cape to assist in targeted planning.
Develop strategies on how to mainstream gender into the PGDP including assist in
budgeting for mainstreaming
Develop monitoring and evaluation programmes to enable the OSW to assess extent of
gender responsiveness of the province’s programmes
Develop a strategy for building gender competence within the provincial departments
Based on the information collected, assist the various provincial departments to identify
their gender related priorities and interventions to address gender inequities.
Develop strategies that will ensure that objectives, outputs, and activities are sensitive to
gender equality and meet the needs and priorities of both women and men and, minimise
constraints to women’s participation.
4. Methods
5. Reporting requirements
The consultant will be in constant liaison with the UNDP’s SURF Gender Specialist. A
monthly meeting will be held with the PMU, the SURF Specialist, the consultant and the OSW
to assess the progress made.
6. Required qualifications
Post graduate degree in any field of the social sciences or an undergraduate degree in the
social sciences with proven working experience in the area of gender and development.
Substantive proven experience in Gender and Development
Experience in working and knowledge about the Eastern Cape on gender related activities an
advantage
Proven practical experiences in gender mainstreaming, training and development of gender
sensitive planning frameworks
Fluency in English and knowledge of other local South Africa languages an added advantage