Page

Flax Nikole

From

Lerner Lois

Sent

Friday

To

Flax Nikole

Subject

FW

Attachments

2012 WorkplanFINALDRAFT

Director

From

of

White

Phil said this

was

Law

have this

is

12

2012

8 08

latest version

the

Page 6

Organizations

Customer Education

Outreach

202 283 9145 Phone

awhiteirsgov

shirley

From

Smith Philip

Sent Tuesday

To

White

Subject

Philip

January

Shirley

102012

2012 WorkPlan

Smith

Exempt Organizations
Customer Education

202 283 9163

212013

our

latest

version

WorkPlan

AE White
Exempt

0811 doc

AM

Specialist

IRS TEGE

11

G
2012

Tax

Organizations

January

FW

Shirley

13 20124 35 PM

Shirley

Lerner Lois

Subject

you

Exempt

Sent Thursday

To

January

2012 WorkPlan

know what

Dont

Outreach

101

PM

mid page has the

paragraph about Select Check

1 of1

Page

Flax Nikole

From

Lerner Lois

Sent

Monday

To

Flax Nikole

Cc

Grant Joseph

Subject

Work

January

C
H

plan

at all
am supposed to speak at an
26th will we have the work plan out by then

Not pushing
the

0920126 50 PM

Au
heads

up thanks

Director

2112013

of

Exempt

Organizations

Independent
if

not

Sector webinar on

should give them a

1 of1

October

MEMORANDUM FOR

ALL

FROM

Nanette

EO EXAMINATION AREA MANAGERS

M Downing

Director

SUBJECT

EO

Procedures

Examinations

for

Dual Track Approach

Possible Political

EO

continues

We

expenditures
activities with

new

to enforce

political

Be

campaign intervention

checked

against

alleging

committee
possible

The

will

be

political

attached

learned

document

from past

handled through

to focus

on

political

examination

intervention

EO

has developed

risk

with respect to

in reporting

will

our standard

intervention

where no

referrals

will

continue

In addition other potential

intervention

identified

through

process

to

has been received

to

be

compliance

risk

modeling

reviewed

by a

issues involving
of

Form 990

data

for evaluation

provides guidance for processing

Any

referral

cases

questions regarding the dual track

CSCI manager Jason Kall Team Leader Frances McKenna

Matter Experts Vincent

and campaign

projects

Form 990

political

models

for examination

campaign

a committee

campaign intervention
to

cases

servants

campaign

sent to

campaigns

to political

and inconsistencies
These

Involving

data and

of career civil

political

referrals

for Issues

Intervention

Based on Form 990 data

noncompliance

Assist in identifying

Referrals

have

of impermissible

allegations

gather additional

relating

we

are combining what

to identify potential

possible

also

the rules

are using a dual track approach

models

Campaign

information gleaned from the redesigned

on serious

resources

We

work

its

4 2012

Fusco or Kim Wiley

involving

possible

process should be

political

directed

or Political Activity Subject

Attachment

Referral Track

Processing
Standard

Referrals

EO

referral

Alleging

procedures apply

intervention Organizations

Campaign

Political

to processing

the referral contains

information indicating

Steps for Referrals

Alleging

the organization

Campaign

Political

referrals

alleging

EO submodule

do not have an

that

Intervention

are included

an exempt

is

Intervention

all

campaign

political

process

in this

if

organization

501 c subsections

Step 1

A referral is

received

as

identified

in Classification Referrals

alleging

entered

an exempt organization

that

into the referral

has engaged

database

and

in prohibited political

campaign intervention

Step 2

The

by an experienced

referral is classified

the referral does not allege

process

dual track
but the

would

between

screened out cases

Step

3a

501

c3

political

not have

to wait for

501

Therefore

Step

or not

3b Other
Because

campaign

these

c3

501 c

intervention

to confirm

from the process

political

process and
of the close

continue
review

periodically

will

in the

and the need

activities

allegations should

be

make a

will

are permitted
generally

return

relative

go

ROO

determination

a year and

the return

the case to the

is

to

be

to

those

appropriate

organizations

to

be

we do

prohibited
action

ROO group

filed

to

filed

conduct

needed

return

limited

in order

campaign

political

to properly evaluate

all

of

campaign intervention

the organization

is

compliance

of Operations

has not

whether the organization

return appears

delinquent

PARC See

to

EOCA to

If

therefore

appears

Examinations

is

to its political

to

c3

before considering

filed

due or has been

is

501

are sent to the Review

organizations

or for

by

organizations that have not

cases

than

return to

return

the entitys activities

All

exclusion

in this

Because

for referrals

legislative

legislative

intervention

referrals

activities

If

process

says

of the referral letter

line

Matter Experts

that

not be included

will

it

Organizations

Because

whether

Subject

Political Activity

the classifier determines that

If

activity

would not be included

it

campaign and

political

and circumstances

facts

all

included

the subject

if

a UBI issue

the regular classification

follow

relationship

review

For instance

alleges only

letter

classifier

or legislative

political

to

filed

has been operating

be

8 with

for

will

more

delinquent

Classification Referrals

Steps 7 and

ROO

return

will

forward

the recommendation

for

EO

secure the delinquent return and examine the organization

conduct a compliance

check

If

it

appears

not been

operating

be

will

Other

These

501 c

referrals

than

a year

manager to

Note The

ROO

unit

the case

is

the organization

returned

has

to the

The
becomes

set up as a future year referral

when

Manager

Referrals

because

filed

the return

is filed

or

runs a monthly Future Year

Report and processes the required returns

Referrals

3c

more

resent to the

delinquent

Step

has not been

return

Referrals

Classification

case

that

organizations that have

are sent to

filed

a return

ROO

Step 4

The

entity

was examined

PACI and
is

are researched by Classification Referrals

referrals

and forwarded

retrieved

under the

previously

Political Activity

the result of that examination

ROO

to the

If

it

whether the

to determine

Compliance

Initiative

has been examined the

for consideration

along

prior

case

file

with the current

allegation

Step 5

The

ROO secures

Form

the

filed

Form 990

with any other relevant

along

returns such as

990 T and Form 1120 POL

Step 6

The

ROO tests

sheet
return

to

the organizations

see whether the

has been

filed

risk

against the risk models using

models would have

step

this

Form 990

is

skipped

ROO

identified

a check

the alleged violation

also completes

lead sheet

If

no

on the

case
Step 7

The case

file

the referral database

Committee

the referral is returned

including

and

is forwarded

to Classification Referrals

for review

by a

Political Activities

for updating

Referral

PARC

Step 8

The

PARC reviews

the case

file

and determines

the following

Future Year Referral

Not selected

for

Examination

Check

Selected

for

Compliance

Selected

for

Examination

OCEP

Selected

for

Examination

field

Selected

for

Examination not

Transfer

to

ROO

political

research

for additional

of

whether the case should be one

of

EO

have

will

career

servant

civil

basis for

employees

a minimum

EOCA

of the

operating

PARC

PARC

however

comprised

at all times

are

generally

positions

year The

period of one

PARCs

volunteers for the

and

PARC

one

at least

EPR Manager

filled

on a

rotational

and assign
Managers of EPR

will solicit

are overseen by the

operations

any case

they shall not override or influence

experienced

of three

decision

selection

PARCs

Step 9
If

the case

is

Selected

for

PARC

Examination the

Delivery

CSD

results in the

If

the

for

immediate assignment

case being retained

IRS concluded

intervened

in

in

a group

prior examination

that

the case

will

to

501

Case

10

receipt

c3

of

other which

or

a case order
had

organization

be

classified

to determine

whether

automatically

is

and

Selection

See Step

pending

in Classification

campaign

political

to

whether the case

determines

high priority which results in the case being forwarded

as

high

priority

Otherwise the
categorized

PARC

considers the following

factors

be

should

it

as a high priority

The amount

of

money expended

measured

either

in absolute

terms

or in

relation to the organizations other activities

The

size of the audience

exposed

whether the audience consisted

The

significance

was

for

The

frequency

of the political

national

office in

of the alleged

intervention

occurred

The degree

of specificity

support opposition
organization

The degree

was

five or

campaign

intervention

of candidate

to identify

participation

was an

officer

Any

to

which the organization

a mechanism

For instance
or

For instance whether the

fewer

election

race

For instance whether the

one time

the candidate
it

was

event

or the

very clear

whom the

exempt

or opposing

campaign intervention

constructed
donation

to

intervention

people versus 100

more times versus a

used

supporting

of

contested

closely

used the organizations resources

political

thousands

For instance whether

whether the candidate

The degree

to the alleged

of

in

promote
is

For instance

the alleged intervention

or director

of the

exempt organization

his or her

candidacy

soliciting contributions

to support

its

For instance whether the organization

to solicit

political

by the organization

other relevant factors

of

and

contributions versus

one time

Step 10
the

After

PARC makes

a decision

the classifier updates the referral database

and

routes the case appropriately

Cases
for

selected

Cases

selected

receipt

of

Cases
If

for

exam

as

High

PARC are

by the

Priority

forwarded

CSD

to

immediate assignment

the

exam

Cases

other

as

as compliance

selected

PARC decides

be updated

5666

for

will

be retained

pending

in Classification

a case order

in

checks

the database and

selected

for

future

Report

Information

be forwarded

will

EOCA

to

the case does not merit examination

that

filed

will

require

ROO will

year

future

will

file

not selected

as

year examination

for that

the case

ROO to

forward

Form

prepare

Form 5666

to

Classification Referrals

For cases

that

the additional

Data Analytics

Cases
identify

501

are transferred back

Form 990

noncompliance

potential

to evaluate

ROO

research

for additional
to the

PARC

for

ROO

do

will

review

Track

are identified based on

c3

to

and resubmit the case

research

and

organizations

with the

the

The goal

campaign

political

by law

established

limits

the accuracy of the risk

information

in selecting

intervention

cases

prohibition

501 c

for other

these

to

is

for

and

organizations

models

Step 1

The CSCI

Form 990

analyzes

Organizations

answer

3
4

organizations

No

recognition

5 501 c4
Section

on Form 990 Part IV and

file

report

Part

political

IV question

not report

political

expenditures

on Schedule

and

campaign

activity

on Form 990

but

file

501

527

exemption

or

organizations

that

have terminated

6 organizations

or

file

and

have not applied

2 have

for

a high percentage

that

report

political

expenditures

of

on Schedule

a Form 1120 POL

political

at the

Organizations

c4

contributions

but do not

established

do

that

of

income from

activity

models

1120 POL

Newly established

campaign

political

that

Form 990

to

Organizations

a Form

report

that

risk

a Schedule

2 501 c 3

returns using the following

organizations

same address

reporting

ceasing
within

payments

of

operations

one

to federal

with

501

c4

year
state or local

public

officials

Step 2

The CSCI

researches

previously

under the

prior

exam case

file

to determine

Compliance

Political Activities

and forwarded

is retrieved

have been examined

whether these organizations

PACI

Initiative

to

ROO

to

ROO

project

for consideration

If

so the

along

the

with

current case file

Step 3

The

list

The

ROO secures

organizations

of identified

is forwarded

Step 4
any relevant returns such as Form

990 T

and Form

1120 POL

Step 5

ROO completes the check

case file to the PARC

and a lead sheet

sheet

on each case and forwards the

Step 6

The

PARC reviews

the case

file

whether the case should be one

and determines

of

the following

Future Year Referral

Not selected

for

Examination

Check

Selected

for

Compliance

Selected

for

Examination

OCEP

Selected

for

Examination

field

Selected

for

Examination not

Transfer

to

ROO

political

research

for additional

Step 7
After

PARC makes

the

a decision

the cases are returned

to

ROO

for

database

updating

ROO forwards
Cases
If

the

selected

for

compliance

PARC decides

be returned

Cases

5666

cases selected

that

ROO for

to

selected

for

Information

for examination

checks

CSD

for

be forwarded

to

assignment

EOCA

the case does not merit examination

future

year examination

for that

the case

file

will

non select

closing as a

Report

will

to

future

will

year

require

ROO will

ROO to

forward

Form

prepare

Form 5666

to

Classification Referrals

For cases

that

the additional

are transferred back

research

to

ROO

for additional

and resubmit the case

of

to the

research

PARC

for

ROO

review

will

do

Page

Flax Nikole

From

Lerner Lois

Sent

Friday

To

Flax

Cc

Grant Joseph

Subject

We have

November

Nikole

456 one
about

21 2013

of

more

1175

Exempt

57

AM

the 84 that have thus

Director

02201210

Clarke Stephen

thing

in

our

filing

far filed for

Organizations

sample from 2010

2011

We

will

do

all

of those and

1 of 1