Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
i i ii
does not, of itself, have any bearing on incompatibility. It is the character of the offices rather than the physical condition or ability of the individual holding the position and the office or the two offices which is determinative. 3. Where the existence of the second office precludes the continued existence of the first office or position, no incompatibility exists. For example, if several school districts were dissolved and consolidated into a newly created district, a board member of any of the dissolved districts could ordinarily become a board member of the newly formed school district. 4. A situation that involves two different persons in two different positions does not raise questions of incompatibility of offices and positions. An example would be where one spouse occupies an office or position and the other spouse assumes an apparently incompatible office or position. Although the incompatibility doctrine is not implicated, there may be serious potential conflicts of interest, s 5. The amount or absence of compensation paid to the holder of each office or position being considered is not ordinarily a factor in determining compatibility. However, Tarpo held that absence of compensation is a factor in determining what remedy is appropriate once incompatibility of an office and a position is found.
the town. Even if the school board member were to abstain from voting on such issues, it is questionable whether the best interests of the public are being served when a school board member is a town supervisor. 3. School Board Members and Register of Deeds - In a 1976 opinion, 8 the Attorney General concluded that there are no constitutional or statutory provisions which expressly or impliedly prohibit an individual from holding the office of Register of Deeds and school board member of a common school district. 4. School Teacher and City Alderperson - Because teachers are under the supervision and control of the school board (the body which makes the rules and sets the policies for the district), a court would probably not find the position of teacher to be incompatible with the office of alderperson. Teachers are subordinate to the school board, not the common council. Hence, a major test of incompatibility would not be met. 5. School Board Member and Federal Officer- Article XlII, sec. 3 of the Wisconsin Constitution provides, in part, that no person, except postmasters, holding an office of profit or trust under the United States is eligible to hold any office of trust, profit or honor in Wisconsin. As a result, all such persons are excluded from membership on school boards. This constitutional prohibition against federal officers holding state offices would not be applicable to any federal employee whose position is not accorded the dignity of a federal office. For instance, a United States mail carrier, although a federal employee, is not considered a federal officer. Therefore, mail carriers and postmasters can properly serve as school board members.
Conclusion
The determination of whether a particular position or office is compatible with another depends upon the application of general principles to specific facts and the exact duties and responsibilities of each post. Therefore, if such an issue arises in your district, it is advisable to seek the advice of competent legal counsel.
-- FOOTNOTES 1. Martin v. Smith, 239 Wis. 314 (1941). 2. Article XlV, sec. 13, Wis. Const., provides that the common law, as it was in force in the territory of Wisconsin and not inconsistent with the Wisconsin Constitution, shall be and continue part of Wisconsin law until altered or suspended by the Legislature. 3. Tarpo v. Bowman Public School Dist. No. 1,232 N.W. 2d 67 (N.D.
197s).
4. 67 Op. Atty. Gen. 177 (1978). 5. See sec. 946.13, Wis. Stats. For a discussion of conflict of interest, see "Recurring Questions Concerning Criminal Conflicts of Interest," Wisconsin School News (Oct., 1981), and "Private Interests in Public Contracts Prohibited," Wisconsin School News, (Aug., 1976). 6. For a helpful compilation of the citations of all Attorney General Opinions (through 1969) dealing with the compatibility of particular offices see Index to Opinions, 58 Op. Atty. Gen. 248 (1969). 7. The courts of both North Dakota in Tarpo v. Bowman Public School Dist. No. 1, and Wyoming in Haskins v. State Ex rel. Harrington, $16 P.2d 1171 (Wyo. 1973), have held that a teacher serving a school district could not at the same time serve as a school board member. 8. Op. Atty. Gen. 79-76, (October 20, 1976).