Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
com
Performance Management Introduction - 101 guide series - by Bob Panic the Satyam Whitepaper
Definition:
Performance management is the process of creating a work environment in which people are empowered to perform to the best of their abilities. Performance management is a holistic system that begins when a job or function is defined. It ends when an employee leaves the organisation. Performance measurement is also the process of assessing progress toward achieving predetermined goals. Performance management is building on that process, adding the relevant communication and action on the progress achieved against these predetermined goals. In Organisational Development (OD , performance can be thought of as !ctual "esults vs Desired "esults. !ny discrepancy, where !ctual is less than Desired, could constitute the performance improvement #one. Performance management and improvement can be thought of as a cycle$ %. Performance planning where goals and objectives are established. &. Performance coaching where a manager intervenes to give feedback and adjust performance 3. Performance appraisal where individual performance is formally documented and feedback delivered ! performance problem is any gap between Desired "esults and !ctual "esults. Performance improvement is any effort targeted at closing the gap between !ctual "esults and Desired "esults. In my opinion, performance management helps organi#ations achieve their strategic goals. 'he main purpose of performance management is to link individual objectives and organi#ational objectives and bring about that individuals obey important worth for enterprise.
!dditionally, performance management tries to develop skills of people to achieve their capability to satisfy their own personal goals and aspirations.
Continual improvement
Provide ongoing coaching and feedback Provide effective orientation, education, and training
What is a !"A
! ,"! refers to a target that needs to be achieved by the employee in a given time. ,"!s are the set of performance e-pectations from the employee. 'he focus is on tangible outputs. 1owever this does not mean that tasks that have a 2ualitative output cannot form a ,"!. ,"!s are not job descriptions or routine activities.
$ha##enges
*otivational workforce practices do not work effectively in an organisation that lacks an objective performance measurement system. (hile employed at .atyam as 'ransformation and 6hange *anager for the implementation of .!P 7"P systems (&889 to &88: , I observed gaps in the effective discussion of employee5s Individual Development Plans (IDPs and regular feedback on ,ey "esult !reas (,"!s was lacking. Individuals felt a lack of clarity in their roles and the eligibility criteria for career growth. 'o address the employee concerns, I enhanced .atyam5s performance management system, to provide the employees (including my growing team members with greater opportunities to develop their career potential and align their performance with the organisation5s objectives.
Methodo#ogy
*y answer was simple and I established the PD6! process at .atyam for all global employees starting with my .!P team as a Proof of 6oncept (PO6 . I believe that employee performance management
%,o& '$ompetency ,e*e#opment+ Doing involves evaluating employee developmental needs that will help them strengthen their job+ related skills and competencies, and prioritising and developing a plan of action to achieve the set target. 4igure 9 shows how an employee is Individual Development Plan is developed and ,"!5s finalised$
%$hec-& '$ontinuous Monitoring+ 6hecking includes conducting ongoing reviews where employees5 performance is 2uantitatively measured against the set standards to identify how well the employees are meeting the set goals. 'hereafter, the 2uantitative data is used to derive performance rating during the appraisal period. If poor performance is identified, an immediate plan of action is taken rather than wait until the end of the appraisal period when summary rating levels are assigned.
Impact
(ith implementation of well laid out performance management system as highlighted above, companies reali#ed the following benefits$ (ith continuous performance feedback to employees, formal employee dissension on performance evaluation have reduced from %A+&8 to less than A on an employee base of A88+ %888 (Over :8B reduction (ith formalised P"P, C8B employees with unsatisfactory work performance have improved from a non+compliant level to meeting e-pectations level "eduction in rehiring cost through enhanced retention by using P"P 6ommon understanding between the managers and the subordinates on the e-pectations and the evaluation criteria through increased transparency in the appraisal system. Dreater employee satisfaction on uniform reward=recognition policy and development opportunities. 6onsistently achieving 6ustomer .atisfaction Inde- (6.I of greater than E (on a scale of A for almost F8B of our long term projects as a result of linking individual ,"!s with organisational goals