Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
A Finite Element Code for Full 3-D Electromagnetic Logging Response Computation
hei Yang, Petrophvsics Lab, Geoscience Department, Universitv of Petroleum, Beifing, China, 102200
Summary
Considering the inIluence oI conductivity and
displacement current at the meantime, we have derived a
new Iunctional Iormulation oI and developed a 3D
Einite Element code to simulate electromagnetic well
logging responses in Iull 3D and wide range Irequency.
We have computed the Iield distribution oI a horizontal
and a vertical magnetic Iield coil. We have also given the
response oI induction well logging in derived wells.
Einally we have analyzed the inIluence oI coil radius and
anisotropy.
Introduction
An eIIicient method to solve Iull three-dimensional (3-D)
electromagnetic (EM) Iields is in great demand Ior
practical applications oI EM methods. We have derived a
new Iunctional Iormulation oI and developed a 3D
Einite Element code to simulate electromagnetic responses
in the Irequency domain. Since we have considered the
inIluence oI conductivity and displacement current at the
meantime we can solve EM Iields in a wide range
Irequency.
Method
The diIIerential Iorm oI Maxwell equations in 3D arbitrary
Iormation is
Herein and represent isotropic inductive capacities.
We know Irom (3) that
!
can be expressed by
!
as
Substituting (8) in the equation (1) we have
ThereIore,
!
!
+ is non-curl it can be expressed by
the gradient oI as the Iollowing
!
!
It also can be written as
Substituting (6), (7), (8), (10) in the equation (2) and
rearranging terms, We get
II we assume that all Iields are sinusoidal and using the
complex notation we have
Einally we can have
herein
it is the second order vector wave
equation. In addition, since there is no electric charge
source in our model, equation (4) can be changed as
The variational Iormula oI equation (14) and (15) is
( ) ( )
1
1
1
1
]
1
,
_
,
_
,
_
! ! !
! ! !
Code Benchmark
Eirst, we compared the results oI the code with those oI 2-
D code and showed that they have a good agreement.
Eigure 1a is a 2D 3-layer model. Eigure 1b is the result oI
Numerical Mode Matching method (NMM) and 3D EEM
method in Irequency 20K, Iigure 1c is the result in
Irequency 20M. We can see that the 2 methods get the
very similar result, thereIore, the 3D EEM code is
validated in 2D situation in a wide range Irequency.
Eigure 1a: 2D 3-layer model
!
!
(1)
! !
!
!
+ +
(2)
!
(3)
!
(4)
We Iurther assume that
! !
(5)
! !
(6)
! !
(7)
! !
(8)
,
_
!
!
(9)
!
!
(10)
( )
!
!
!
(11)
! !
(12)
,
_
+ +
!
! ! ! !
(13)
! !
(14)
(15)
SEG Int'l Exposition and Annual Meeting * San Antonio, Texas * September 9-14, 2001
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
0
1
/
2
2
/
1
4
t
o
7
6
.
3
0
.
1
2
8
.
1
2
3
.
R
e
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
S
E
G
l
i
c
e
n
s
e
o
r
c
o
p
y
r
i
g
h
t
;
s
e
e
T
e
r
m
s
o
f
U
s
e
a
t
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
l
i
b
r
a
r
y
.
s
e
g
.
o
r
g
/
A Finite Element Code for Full 3-D Electromagnetic Logging Response Computation
8 10 12
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
Freq=20e3
EATT-2D
DFAI-2D
EATT-3D
DFAI-3D
Depth(m)
Eigure 1b: Result in requency 20K
8 10 12
10
15
20
25
30
35
Freq=20e6
EATT-2D
DFAI-2D
EATT-3D
DFAI-3D
Depth(m)
Eigure 1c: Result in requency 20M
To validate the code in 3D situation, We have also
benchmarked the code with the code discussed in
reIerences |1-2|. Eigure 2a is a 3D 6-layer model, Eigure
2b is the result comparison oI ours and reIerences |1-2| in
a highly deviated well (70