Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Climate Change Impact and Adaptation in Asian Coastal Cities Case of Metro Manila
Megumi MUTO Research Fellow JICA Research Institute Muto.Megumi@jica.go.jp
1
1 2 3 4 5 6
Downscale IPCC climate models for temperature increase @2050 for B1 and A1FI scenarios Assess local effects on precipitation and combine with sea level rise/ storm intensification Simulate different types of hydraulic effects: 1) through river systems, 2) through accumulation of water at lake, and 3) through sea level rise and storm surge at the coast (combination depends on city) Based on the flood maps produced for 12 cases (3 climate scenarios x 2 infrastructure scenarios x 2 return periods), estimate socioeconomic impact (both direct and indirect) with available data, thus deriving the benefit side of adaptation. Consider investment mix and their costs necessary for adaptation (focusing on flood control infrastructure) Conduct Net Present Value (economic, not financial) and EIRR calculations
In addition: Firm and urban poor household surveys to understand the details of vulnerabilities. Health impact analysis
KAMANAVA Area
Pasig-Marikina Basin
KAMANAVA area
Pasig-Marikina area
Downscale IPCC climate models for temperature increase @2050 for B1 and A1FI scenarios (University of Tokyo IR3S for all city case studies)
10
Assess local effects on precipitation and combine with sea level rise/ storm intensification
11
1 2 3 4 5
Status quo climate B1 with storm level at status quo B1 with strengthened storm level A1FI with storm level at status quo A1FI with strengthened storm level
0 19 19 29 29
Simulate different types of hydraulic effects: 1) through river systems, 2) through accumulation of water at lake, and 3) through sea level rise and storm surge at the coast (combination depends on city)
13
Based on the flood maps produced for 12 cases (3 climate scenarios x 2 infrastructure scenarios x 2 return periods), estimate socio-economic impact (both direct and indirect) with available data, thus deriving the benefit side of adaptation.
18
1 2 3
19
No adverse effect to all buildings, infrastructures, utilities and transportation Will affect transportation but no buildings, infrastructures and utilities Definitely affects transportation, some buildings, infrastructures and utilities Adverse effects on transportation, infrastructures, utilities and one floor level of buildings Same as category 5 but will affect two floor levels of buildings Same as category 5 but will affect three floor levels of buildings
20
2 3 4 5
6 7
Socio-economic assessment
Source: Adapted with revisions from Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission (1976) and Green et. al., (1983)
Income
Unit rate from Firm, household surveys
Loss of Income
Traffic Zones
Cost of buildings Vehicle operation cost savings Travel time savings through existing/future road investments Avoided income loss (firms, formal/informal households)
Use future predicted values as much as possible. Use growth rate to arrive from these future values up to 2050. Need more work on shadow prices, etc. Should savings of power/rail operator be included?
24
25
26
Trip data
!!"#$$!%&'()'*!%+',!-./ 01!23 11.87 01!4# 12.95 01!%#5# 13.64 4%6!23 4%6!4# 4%6!%#5# 5.25 6.97 7.62
"#$$!%&'()'*!"78!-./ 01!23 20.08 01!4# 22.13 01!%#5# 23.27 4%6!23 4%6!4# 4%6!%#5# 7.08 7.08 11.74
29
Commercial Buildings Median Construction Cost 11,100 Durable Assets2 27,750 Stocks2
333,000
6,150 2,550
1,538 638
2,691 1,116
7,750 5,700
19,375 14,250
232,500 171,000
Stocks2
1,100
7,500 4,100
2,025 1,107
750 410
Stocks2
22,990
3,550 1,900
15,620 8,360
13,490 7,220
30
Stocks
0.1280
0.267
0.8971
0.8971
Source: Adapted from the Manual for Economic Study on Flood Control, May 2000, Ministry of Construction (presently the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport), Japan 1/ maximum rate given is for depth of 200-299 cm. The same rates are likewise applied to Institutional and Industrial.
31
Existing Infra
32
Affected Roads
Flood Scenario (Existing Infra) Status Quo B1 A1FI Flood Scenario (Businessas-Usual) Status Quo B1 A1FI Road Length by Inundation Depth (kms) 8-20 cm Major 4.5 5.4 5.3 Minor 3.9 9.7 6.9 21-50 cm Major 22.1 13.6 14.6 Minor 23.8 15.1 18.2 Above 50 cm Major 31.9 47.9 53.6 Minor 39.8 55.6 60.3 Total 125.9 147.3 158.9
Road Length by Inundation Depth (kms) 8-20 cm Major 3.78 7.24 9.45 Minor 4.33 8.15 9.05 21-50 cm Major 6.40 9.54 12.62 Minor 10.45 15.73 16.28 Above 50 cm Major 7.45 12.07 14.97 Minor 13.42 20.82 25.63 Total 45.82 73.55 87.99
33
Affected Vehicles
27
12 13
14 28 15
Daily Traffic Volumes from Roadside Traffic Count Stations in Metro Manila
16
17 18 19 1 2 3 4 5 7 21 22 8 23 10 24 25 26 11 9 6 20 29
34
Total Public Direction Vehicles Both Directions Inundation Cost (Php/km) 687,965
Total
146,313
796,606 3,745,642
918,271 4,433,607
35
No. of Trips Private 217,645 280,046 295,015 999,355 1,223,565 1,212,727 121,971 174,004 229,933 208,314 341,766 429,490
Cumulative Travel Time Delay Cost (Php/hr) Public Private 38,517,064 46,426,792 47,652,359 144,518,892 157,970,385 159,739,956 15,107,760 22,263,697 27,597,116 32,950,807 51,703,832 68,449,818 17,629,240 22,683,717 23,896,185 147,904,489 177,993,032 179,483,552 9,879,688 14,058,719 18,624,607 30,830,421 50,581,344 63,564,534
36
EXISTING INFRA: 2002 Status Quo 855,935 B1 1,031,706 A1F1 1,058,941 EXISTING INFRA: 2050 Status Quo 1,741,191 B1 1,903,258 A1F1 1,924,578 BUSINESS-AS-USUAL 2002 Status Quo 335,728 B1 496,336 A1F1 613,269 BUSINESS-AS-USUAL 2050 Status Quo 396,998 B1 622,938 A1F1 824,697
LGU City of Manila Kalookan City Makati City Malabon City Mandaluyong City Marikina City Navotas Pasay City Pasig City Quezon City San Juan City Taguig City Pateros Total MM
Source: JICA-MMUTIS
Flood-affected Generated/Attracted Trips by Purpose School Recreation Medical Religious 2,002,254 41,034 164,033 92,195 284 3,339 5,507 169,085 2,464 5,445 18,075 197,922 1,538 2,764 11,520 143,333 1,275 4,052 6,639 173,042 2,820 4,878 16,313 115,391 1,943 1,758 6,840 30,505 662 2,199 1,158 280,050 4,897 13,777 22,249 460,404 4,080 47,833 33,372 58,564 499 2,725 3,408 96,033 4,665 2,415 5,971 52,406 600 522 3929 3,871,184 66,161 255,218 267,028
With a trip rate of 2.2, approximately 1.8 M students affected 37
Water facilities
No damage of flood assumed since: Pipes are positively charged; No record of floodrelated damage incidences; and Facilities are above flood levels.
38
Power sector
39
Substations CBP 1-A (at Mall of Asia, Pasay City) North Port (at Antipolo St., Tondo, Manila) Capasco (at Napindan Road, Taguig) Taguig (at Elisco Road, Taguig)
Affected Areas Pasay City Paranaque City Manila South Kalookan Navotas CAPASCO Taguig Taguig City Pateros Makati City Pasig City Mandaluyong City Malate, Manila Sta. Ana, Manila San Andres, Manila Paco, Manila Ermita, Manila Makati City Pasay City Paranaque City Makati City
4.88 4.88
6.10
40
Consider investment mix and their costs necessary for adaptation (focusing on flood control infrastructure)
42
43
Conduct Net Present Value (economic, not financial) and EIRR calculations
44
P30 Benefits
45
8.12
1,833
9,912
46
In addition
Firm and urban poor household surveys to understand the details of vulnerabilities. ! Health impact analysis.
!
47
KAMANAVA Area
100
100
300
48
49
Number of affected 139 households Mean absent days 3.95 Note:% of sample households is presented in the parenthesis
50
51
1 (0%) Kidney Disorder 0 (0%) 300 Total Note:% within column is presented in the parenthesis
52
Number of 100 housholds getting ill Mean medications fee 1063 Note:% of sample households is presented in the parenthesis
53
54
Tidal Surge 267 (89%) 19 (6%) 7 (2%) 3 (1%) 2 (1%) 0 (0%) 2 (1%) 52
Typhoons 233 (78%) 38 (13%) 18 (6%) 6 (2%) 3 (1%) 0 (0%) 2 (1%) 86 629
699 649 Mean income loss Note: % of sample households is presented in the parenthesis
55
Firm Level Number of affected firms & the temporarily stopped days
Area Pasig - Marikina Bgys Kamanava Bgys West Manggahan Bgys Other Barangays All Establishments Obs. 86 66 58 76 286 Affected firms (over the past 3 years) No. 28 37 29 40 134 % 32.6 56.1 50.0 52.6 46.9 Mean 1.0 2.3 1.8 1.8 1.8 Stopped days Min 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.5 0.1 Max 2 9 14 7 14
56
57
Area
Obs.
148 55 43
Other Barangays 60 46 2 1 13 1 Note: One firm may cite more than one reason, so the number of affected firms does not equal the number of the reasons of work absence
58
59
60
Estimated daily risk of infection via incidental ingestion of flood water in Manila City
61