Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 5

CHAPTER 16 STEPHENSON REAL ESTATE RECAPITALIZATION

1. If Stephenson wishes to maximize the overall value of the firm, it should use debt to finance the $60 million purchase. Since interest payments are tax deductible, debt in the firms capital structure will decrease the firms taxable income, creating a tax shield that will increase the overall value of the firm. Since Stephenson is an all-equity firm with 20 million shares of common stock outstanding, worth $35.50 per share, the market value of the firm is: Market value of equity = $35.50(20,000,000) Market value of equity = $710,000,000 So, the market value balance sheet before the land purchase is: Market value balance sheet $710,000,000 Equity $710,000,000 Debt & Equity

2.

Assets Total assets 3. a.

$710,000,000 $710,000,000

As a result of the purchase, the firms pre-tax earnings will increase by $14 million per year in perpetuity. These earnings are taxed at a rate of 40 percent. Therefore, after taxes, the purchase increases the annual expected earnings of the firm by: Earnings increase = $14,000,000(1 .40) Earnings increase = $8,400,000 Since Stephenson is an all-equity firm, the appropriate discount rate is the firms unlevered cost of equity, so the NPV of the purchase is: NPV = $60,000,000 + ($8,400,000 / .125) NPV = $7,200,000

b.

After the announcement, the value of Stephenson will increase by $7.2 million, the net present value of the purchase. Under the efficient-market hypothesis, the market value of the firms equity will immediately rise to reflect the NPV of the project. Therefore, the market value of Stephensons equity after the announcement will be: Equity value = $710,000,000 + 7,200,000 Equity value = $717,200,000 Market value balance sheet $710,000,000 7,200,000 Equity $717,200,000 Debt & Equity

Old assets NPV of project Total assets

$717,200,000 $717,200,000

Since the market value of the firms equity is $717,200,000 and the firm has 20 million shares of common stock outstanding, Stephensons stock price after the announcement will be: New share price = $717,200,000 / 20,000,000 New share price = $35.86 Since Stephenson must raise $60 million to finance the purchase and the firms stock is worth $35.86 per share, Stephenson must issue: Shares to issue = $60,000,000 / $35.86 Shares to issue = 1,673,173 c. Stephenson will receive $60 million in cash as a result of the equity issue. This will increase the firms assets and equity by $60 million. So, the new market value balance sheet after the stock issue will be: Market value balance sheet $ 60,000,000 710,000,000 7,200,000 Equity $777,200,000 Debt & Equity

Cash Old assets NPV of project Total assets

$777,200,000 $777,200,000

The stock price will remain unchanged. To show this, Stephenson will now have: Total shares outstanding = 20,000,000 + 1,673,173 Total shares outstanding = 21,673,173 So, the share price is: Share price = $777,200,000 / 21,673,173 Share price = $35.86

d.

The project will generate $14 million of additional annual pretax earnings forever. These earnings will be taxed at a rate of 40 percent. Therefore, after taxes, the project increases the annual earnings of the firm by $8.4 million. So, the aftertax present value of the earnings increase is: PVProject = $8,400,000 / .125 PVProject = $67,200,000 So, the market value balance sheet of the company will be: Market value balance sheet $710,000,000 67,200,000 Equity $777,200,000 Debt & Equity

Old assets PV of project Total assets 4. a.

$777,200,000 $777,200,000

Modigliani-Miller Proposition I states that in a world with corporate taxes: V L = V U + t CB As was shown in Question 3, Stephenson will be worth $777.2 million if it finances the purchase with equity. If it were to finance the initial outlay of the project with debt, the firm would have $60 million worth of 8 percent debt outstanding. So, the value of the company if it financed with debt is: VL = $777,200,000 + .40($60,000,000) VL = $801,200,000

b.

After the announcement, the value of Stephenson will immediately rise by the present value of the project. Since the market value of the firms debt is $60 million and the value of the firm is $801.2 million, we can calculate the market value of Stephensons equity. Stephensons market-value balance sheet after the debt issue will be: Market value balance sheet $777,200,000 Debt 24,000,000 Equity $801,200,000 Debt & Equity

Value unlevered Tax shield Total assets

$ 60,000,000 741,200,000 $801,200,000

Since the market value of the Stephensons equity is $741.2 million and the firm has 20 million shares of common stock outstanding, Stephensons stock price after the debt issue will be: Stock price = $741,200,000 / 20,000,000 Stock price = $37.06 5. If Stephenson uses equity in order to finance the project, the firms stock price will remain at $35.86 per share. If the firm uses debt in order to finance the project, the firms stock price will rise to $37.06 per share. Therefore, debt financing maximizes the per share stock price of a firms equity.

CHAPTER 17 McKENZIE CORPORATIONS CAPITAL BUDGETING


1. We assume the $8.4 million is spent over the course of the year so we can ignore time value of money considerations. If we include the time value of money, the numerical solutions will change slightly, but the analysis will remain the same. The expected value of the company in one year without expansion is: V = .30($30,000,000) + .50($35,000,000) + .20($51,000,000) V = $36,700,000 And the expected value of the company in one year with expansion is: V = .30($33,000,000) + .50($46,000,000) + .20($64,000,000) V = $45,700,000 The companys stockholders appear to be better off with expansion since the expected NPV of the project is positive. The difference in the expected value of the company with and without expansion is $9,000,000. If the required investment is $8.4 million, the expansion creates a positive increase in expected value for current shareholders. However, as further analysis will show, stockholders are actually worse off. 2. The value of the companys debt with low economic growth is the value of the company because the company value is less than the face value of the debt. In both other economic states, the value of the debt is the face value of the debt. So, the expected value of debt in one year without expansion is: VD = .30($30,000,000) + .50($34,000,000) + .20($34,000,000) VD = $32,800,000 And the value of the companys debt in one year with expansion is: VD = .30($33,000,000) + .50($34,000,000) + .20($34,000,000) VD = $33,700,000

3.

The value of the companys equity with low economic growth is zero both with and without expansion since the company value will be less than the face value of the debt. The value of equity with normal growth or high growth is the value of the company minus the $34 million face value of debt. So, the expected value of the equity without expansion is: VE = .30($0) + .50($1,000,000) + .20($17,000,000) VE = $3,900,000 And the value of equity with expansion is: VE = .30($0) + .50($12,000,000) + .20($30,000,000) VE = $12,000,000 The value expected for bondholders from the expansion is the difference in the expected value of debt. So, with expansion, the companys bondholders gain: Bondholder gain = $33,700,000 32,800,000 Bondholder gain = $900,000 And the value expected for stockholders is: Stockholder gain = $12,000,000 3,900,000 Stockholder gain = $8,100,000 The stockholder value increases by $8.1 million, but the expansion was funded entirely by equity, so the expected NPV of expansion for stockholders is actually: Stockholder NPV = $8,400,000 + 8,100,000 Stockholder NPV = $300,000

4.

Assuming bondholders are fully informed and they act rationally, they will expect the stockholders to act in their best interest and not expand, so the price of the bonds will not change. If the expansion is announced, the price of the bonds will increase. If they dont expand, nothing will happen since it is already priced into the bond. If the company announces the expansion, they signal they are willing to sacrifice for the bondholders, so the company will receive a lower interest rate in the future. It is a stronger signal that stockholders are not acting in their best interest if the expansion is financed with cash on hand. If the company issues new equity, the expected loss in stock value is shared proportionally by the new investors, so the current stockholders will not bear the entire loss in stock value alone. By expanding with cash on hand, current stockholders are bearing the entire expected loss in stock value.

5.

6.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi