Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 83

Introduction

Linn County West Feasibility Report


September 22, 2009

Introduction

Linn County West (LCW) is the adaptive re-use of a building constructed in 1978-79 as a

Montgomery Wards department store, one of four original anchor stores for Westdale Mall

shopping center. The LCW building contains just under 120,000 gross square feet of space

divided between two levels. Almost 75,000 square feet are located on the lower level and almost

45,000 square feet including the mechanical penthouse and the unheated “Outdoor Sales Area”

are on the upper level. Both levels are directly accessible from surface parking lots and both

levels have direct access to Westdale Mall.

Linn County leased the space to provide emergency housing for a number of its departments

displaced by the 2008 flood. Linn County would now like to consider the feasibility of converting

the former Montgomery Wards store into permanent County administrative offices.

page 1 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

In an attempt to make the findings of this feasibility study comparable with other options that the

County is considering, the renovation of Linn County West has the following goals:

1. Provide permanent office space for the departments currently located at Linn County West

and identified by Linn County as intended to remain.

2. Provide permanent office space for as yet unidentified departments, agencies or tenants

with a similar use of space as those departments being relocated to other facilities from

Linn County West.

3. Bring Linn County West into conformance with current building and energy Codes.

4. Provide finishes consistent with proposed renovation of the Linn County Administrative

Office Building (AOB).

5. The offices located at Linn County West are to remain open and accessible to the public

throughout construction.

6. The renovated Linn County West will qualify for LEED Silver certification.

page 2 of 55
Executive Summary
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

Executive Summary

Area of Linn County West

Land: 8.9+/- Acres

Building: 119,544 s.f.

Renovation Goals

1. Provide permanent office space for the departments currently located at Linn County West

and identified by Linn County as intended to remain.

2. Provide permanent office space for as yet unidentified departments, agencies or tenants

with a similar use of space as those departments being relocated to other facilities from

Linn County West.

3. Bring Linn County West into conformance with current building and energy Codes.

4. Provide finishes consistent with proposed renovation of the Linn County Administrative

Office Building (AOB).

5. The offices located at Linn County West are to remain open and accessible to the public

throughout construction.

6. The renovated Linn County West will qualify for LEED Silver certification.

Renovation First Cost: $ 15,289,000

Anticipated Annual Energy Costs: $ 77,500

Annual Common Area maintenance (CAM) Fees $ 50,000

Life Cycle Cost Analysis: Calculated Total Present Worth $ 19,409,030

page 3 of 55
Space Needs
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

Space Needs

The current configuration of spaces in the Linn County West building includes a number of

agencies or departments already scheduled to be relocated to other facilities. The specific space

requirements for these agencies are not included as part of this study, but the square footage they

occupy is. These departments or agencies scheduled for relocation include:

• Clerk of Courts – Juvenile & Traffic

• Court – Family, Traffic & Juvenile

• General Assistance

• Juvenile Probation

• Linn County Community Services (LCCS)

• LCCS Financial

• LCCS Conference Rooms

• MHDD – Case Management

• MHDD / CPC

• MHDD – In-Home Services & Supervised Apartment Living

• MHDD - Intake Services

• MHDD – Protective Payee

• Veterans Affairs

Most of these agencies are located on the second floor of the LCW building and occupy all of that

level except the Loading Dock and Purchasing/Mail Room. Family, Traffic and Juvenile Court, the

Clerk of Courts for Juvenile & Traffic and the Juvenile Probation office occupy a large area on the

ground floor of the LCW building.

page 4 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

The Board of Supervisors has considered other departments currently housed at the LCW

building for relocation to the Administration Office Building (AOB). These other departments

would remain at Linn County West if renovation of this facility into permanent county offices is

judged to be more feasible than other options. Table 1 lists the agencies that would remain at

LCW, the square footage they currently occupy, the space that has been assigned for them at the

AOB, and the space that has been budgeted to them in the LCW for this study. The larger square

footages occupied by each department in the current configuration is assumed to be the result of

inefficiencies in the layout driven by the need to locate the offices in the LCW quickly and with

minimum remodeling. The AOB space assignments result from a more careful consideration of

departmental needs and more accurately reflect the true space requirements for each

department. The program spaces used for this study are based on the space assignments

established for the AOB.

page 5 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

Table 1: Space Needs for County Departments Identified To Remain At LCW

LCW Current AOB Space Assumed

Space Usage Assignment Space Needs

Departments to Remain at LCW Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft.

Assessor – County 3,024 2,668 2,700

Auditor 7,104 4,480 4,500

Board of Supervisors / Finance 3,536 3,500


6,984
Human Resources / Risk 1,680 1,700

Supervisor’s Meeting Room 1,152 1,928 2,000

Purchasing / Mail Room 1,728 1,232 1,200

Recorder 5,760 4,928 4,900

Treasurer / Motor Vehicle 10,080 6,048 6,000

Planning / Development 4,608 2,760 2,800

IT Dept. 4,032 3,192 3,200

Facilities Unknown 2,658 2,700

Shared Conference Rooms 690 6,104 6,100

Electrical/Communications 285 400


3,664
Mechanical Spaces 899 1,500

Total 48,826 42,398 43,200

page 6 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

The total area of program spaces identified in Table 1 is considerably less than the available

space in the building. For the purposes of calculating air conditioning requirements and energy

demands for this study, it will be assumed that the County would fill the available space in the

building with other departments having similar offices.

Conference rooms are necessary to conduct routine business in most offices. Because they are

typically not used continuously, conference rooms offer an opportunity to share a resource among

departments. Strategic location of the conference rooms allows individual departments to take

ownership of smaller conference rooms, controlling that room’s scheduling for their convenience,

while facilitating the use of that same room by other departments when needed. Larger

conference rooms should be considered community property and should be located so that they

are not likely to become the property of any one department. Instead they should be located for

convenient use by multiple departments or by the public.

page 7 of 55
Existing Conditions
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

Available Space

The Lynn County West building includes 74,820 gross square feet on the lower level. The upper

level includes 36,444 gross square feet plus 4,616 gross square feet in what had previously

been known as the “Outdoor Sales Area”.

The “Outdoor Sales Area” is protected by its roof, a wall it shares with the main building on the

north and another wall that separates it from some mechanical spaces on the east. The south

and west sides are open to the weather, enclosed only by columns supporting the roof with steel

gates between. Since the closing of the Wards store, painted plywood attached to the interior

side of the steel gates has sealed the space from public view and to reduce the need for

maintenance in the area. Although not originally intended as part of the building’s interior space,

it would not be difficult to renovate this area into interior space. However, for the purposes of

this study, when energy costs and life cycle costs are calculated, the “Outdoor Sales Area” will

not be counted as conditioned interior space.

The following table summarizes the available space at Linn County West:

Table 2: Available Space at Linn County West

Upper Level

Primary Space 36,444 g.s.f.

Former Outdoor Sales 4,616 g.s.f.

Mechanical Penthouses 2,991 g.s.f.

Mechanical Rooms 673 g.s.f

44,724 g.s.f.

Lower Level 74,820 g.s.f.

Total 119,544 g.s.f.

page 8 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

The land associated with Linn County West covers an area of just under nine acres and

includes driveways and paved parking areas on the north, east and south sides of the building.

Surface parking is provided for 553 vehicles. The parking areas and driveways are paved with

asphalt originally installed in 1980. The condition of the asphalt is poor. Stormwater

management occurs off-site.

Existing Conditions: Site

Most of the site beyond the footprint of the Linn County West building is paved for walks, drives

and parking. Most of that pavement is in poor condition and has been allowed to deteriorate to

the point that it should be replaced. Vegetated areas are limited to a narrow strips between the

building and the perimeter sidewalk, to a steep side slope separating the south parking area

from the east parking area, to a small and narrow side slope separating the east parking area

from an entrance drive, and one small, triangular island marking the north side of an access

drive. There is no provision for detaining or treating stormwater on site.

Existing Conditions: Building Structure and Envelope

The Linn County West building is a free-standing, two-story, steel-framed structure independent

of the structure of Westdale Mall. Elements of the existing steel frame appear to be in good

condition as does the elevated floor slab. The joint separating the two structures is bridged by

cap flashing and sealants on the exterior, and by joint covers on the interior. If the mall building

were to be razed, wall materials would be exposed to view and to the weather that were not

intended to be exposed. The Linn County West building would remain essentially complete, but

new cladding would be needed in these areas to protect and conceal the newly exposed wall

materials.

page 9 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

A building envelope is the assembly of materials that shelter the building’s interior spaces from

the outdoor environment: the roof, the walls with doors and windows, the foundation and the

floor slab at grade. The visual characteristics of the building envelope provide cues to a

building’s style and appeal. The performance characteristics of the building envelope play a

large role in determining a building’s energy efficiency and the comfort of its inhabitants.

The existing building envelope at Lynn County West is in need of extensive maintenance work.

Water infiltration to occupied spaces following recent rains indicates that the building envelope

may be failing at a number of points. The building is poorly insulated by today’s standards. The

masonry exhibits extensive damage attributable to water infiltration and thermal movement.

page 10 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

The original roof design was a built-up bituminous membrane laid over 2 1/4” of rigid insulation

on a structurally sloped roof deck. The existing roofing system is a fully-adhered TPO

membrane over insulation on most of the building area. Two areas of roofing flanking the

mechanical penthouse have a ballasted TPO membrane. No roofing cores were taken at the

time observations were made for this study to determine the type or thickness of insulation in

the current roofing assembly. A warranty placard on display at the roof access indicates that

the TPO roofing system was under warranty until August 7, 2002. The system is now seven

years beyond its warranty date. Observations on the roof of fresh sealant applied at membrane

flashing keeper bars, of newer membrane patches and of ballast raked back to expose

membrane seams suggest an on-going battle against leaks. The roof exhibits numerous repairs

and is old enough that total replacement as part of the renovation makes the most sense.

page 11 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

The exterior masonry is a veneer of dark-colored, king-size, fired-clay brick units set in a 1/3

running bond. Typically, the masonry has an 8” steel stud frame back-up, but in specific areas,

such as at stair towers or at elevator shafts, the masonry has a concrete block back-up. There is

3 ½ “batt insulation with a vapor barrier facing the building’s interior between the studs where

the back-up is steel stud framing. Only ¾” thick rigid insulation is indicated for locations having

block back-up.

Typical for masonry veneer wall construction in the late 1970’s, the wall is treated as a barrier

with little or no provision made to manage water that may infiltrate the wall system. There is no

space between the brick veneer and its back-up to channel water away from the building’s

interior. There is no damp-proofing or building wrap indicated between the brick and the back-up

sheathing. No through-wall flashings are indicated in the plans for the foundation-masonry

interface or for other key locations, and no evidence of through-wall flashings was observed on

site. Relief joints in the masonry require new sealants. The existing sealants at relief joints have

cracked and pulled away from the masonry, providing little or no protection against water

infiltration.

page 12 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

There are no windows penetrating the masonry envelope. The only windows to the exterior in

the Linn County West building are side lights at the entrance vestibules and some skylights over

the escalators. The absence of natural light in the building’s interior may have been suitable for

a department store, but it is not acceptable for office space.

Parapets are those portions of the wall rising above a building’s roof line. The Linn County West

building features fairly tall parapets made to look like a seamless continuation of the wall below.

The framing for the parapets is typically a balloon-framed extension of the lower wall’s back-up

framing. The roof side of most parapets is clad with painted, corrugated steel panels over a

double layer of gypsum board sheathing. The paint on the steel panels is heavily oxidized and

the panels exhibit rust in many places. The wall that is common with mall is faced with fired clay

brick set in a 1/3 running bond backed with concrete masonry units. Metal cap flashings at

parapets also exhibit some rusting.

The Linn County West building also features five porches at the public entrances. The porches

feature masonry columns supporting massive masonry volumes designed to break down the

building’s scale and provide visual interest. The masonry volumes provide no usable space

within the building. The porches also feature banks of skylights over key entrances. The

masonry at the porches is in poor condition. There is evidence of water leaking into the wall

system from the skylights and of thermal stress on the brick units.

page 13 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

The original construction drawings show that the concrete foundations were to be protected

from water infiltration by the application of a 20 mil neoprene membrane extending from grade

to the footing, and with a flashing of the same neoprene material across the top of the footing

adding protection to the joint between the footing and the foundation wall. Four-inch diameter

footing drains to intercept ground water were to be installed at the base of the south foundation

wall and along the south end of the east foundation wall where the earth is graded up to the

building’s upper floor level. No clean-outs were observed for this footing drain and no outlet for

this drain was observed. No determination of silting within the drain could be made. Whether or

not the footing drain is functioning at all was not determined. County employees have installed a

new sump and pump along the building’s east wall outside of the freight elevator shaft. The new

sump pump is set to discharge water to the adjacent planting bed.

page 14 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

The original construction drawings indicate that 1” thick rigid insulation was to be applied to the

top four feet on the exterior side of foundations walls that were not exposed. Where the upper

parts of foundation walls were exposed, such as at the loading docks, the insulation was to be

applied to the first four feet below grade. The existence or condition of this insulation has not

been confirmed.

The original construction documents show the floor on the ground level of the building

constructed as a 4” concrete slab over a 6 mil membrane on a sand bed at least 4” thick. A

water stop was to have been cast into the joint between the floor slab and the foundation wall.

page 15 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

Existing Conditions: Electrical Power Distribution and Lighting

Linn County West inherited a 277/480 volt, 3,000 amp electrical service when it took possession

of the former Montgomery Wards store. The main switchboard is fed from a pad-mounted

transformer owned by Alliant Energy. The main switchboard feeds several 277/480 volt

distribution panels throughout the facility as well as a motor control center located in the

mechanical penthouse. At each 277/480 volt distribution panel location there is a transformer

and 120/208 volt panelboard. The original design drawing indicates that the large feeders used

aluminum conductors.

Generally, the electrical distribution system is functional; however, it is nearing the end of its

service life. Since the facility was designed as a department store, the major electrical loads

were cooling, heating and lighting with little 120/208 volt distribution. At least two of the

underground feeder conduits were conveying ground water into the distribution panels.

page 16 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

Emergency power is provided by a 45 kW gasoline engine driven generator and an automatic

transfer switch feeding an emergency panel. The engine-generator is original to the building. It

was not functional at the time of inspection, but was in the process of being repaired. The

engine generator is at the end of its service life and does not meet Linn County’s requirements

to have emergency power for the entire facility.

Lighting systems in the building date to the original construction. Open areas are lit with 6-lamp

fluorescent fixtures with egg-crate grills. Storage areas are lit with continuous rows of open

lamp fluorescent T12 strip fixtures. Lighting control is through lighting contactors distributed

throughout the facility.

page 17 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

The existing lighting systems exceed current energy code power density limits. The light fixture

type and light distribution is not appropriate for an office environment.

Existing telecommunicating infrastructure consists of a central computer room and intermediate

distribution points located throughout the facility. All current telecommunication facilities were

installed by the County. All telecommunications facilities will require replacement or relocation to

dedicated equipment spaces and cable pathways.

The existing fire alarm system is an addressable Notifier system with audible and visual

annunciation throughout the building and with smoke detection in select areas. The system

does not meet the County’s requirement to combine the fire alarm with a mass communication

system and no components are salvageable.

page 18 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

Existing Conditions: Mechanical Systems

Cooling

The building is cooled by three water cooled reciprocating chillers and a cooling tower located

on the roof outside the mechanical penthouse. The mechanical penthouse also contains two

custom built air handling units. Each unit contains a large array of pleated filters, direct

expansion cooling coils and a belt driven fan with inlet vanes for air volume control. HR Green

was unable to determine whether the inlet guide vanes still operated or what controls the

position of the vanes. Conditioned air is delivered to spaces via ductwork containing variable air

volume boxes that modulate in response to space temperatures. Air is returned to the unit

through a return air plenum above the ceiling on both floors. The mechanical penthouse

contains two large outside air louvers and two large relief air louvers each with roll-up doors on

the exterior side. Outside air and return air are mixed in the space outside the air handling unit

rooms. Currently, both relief air louvers are blocked causing relief air to exit by exfiltration

through mall entrances. One outside air louver has been blocked and the other has been

reduced in size resulting in an unknown amount of outside air entering the building.

page 19 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

The cooling system dates from original construction with very few modifications since that time.

The system was reported to be functional but all the equipment has exceeded its useful life.

The cooling tower shows signs of organic deposits on the interior of the unit which reduces the

efficiency of the unit. The chillers are less efficient than currently available cooling systems and

also contain the refrigerant R-22 which is being phased out of production in 2010. The existing

ductwork is sized and arranged to accommodate an open floor plan department store. The

ductwork is not sized correctly nor will the ductwork layout be sufficient when the space is

converted to an office type environment. In addition, due to its age, the ductwork is assumed to

have air leaks which result in higher energy costs. The entire cooling system including

ductwork and the air handling units will require replacement.

The computer/communications room is cooled year-round by a split system air conditioning unit

installed as part of the temporary renovation required for the county to occupy the building. The

space is served by a single unit and no backup system is present if the primary system fails.

Heating

The building is heated by a separate ductwork system. Electric resistance furnaces are located

above the ceiling and scattered throughout the building. The furnaces use air from the return

plenum above the ceiling and supply warm air through diffusers identical in appearance to the

cooling system diffusers. Smaller spaces created by the temporary remodel are likely to have

only one supply of air (hot or cold). Heat in entrances and auxiliary spaces is provided by

electric unit heaters and electric radiant heaters. Electric baseboards are used to handle the

skin loads in rooms with exterior walls. The two air handling units are reported to still operate

during the winter months to provide ventilation air to the building. The ventilation air is not

page 20 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

conditioned during the winter and a high return air to outside air ratio must be relied upon to

keep supply air temperatures high enough to avoid occupant discomfort.

The use of electric resistance heating throughout the building leads to high electrical

consumption and demand charges during the winter months. In addition, the entire heating

system dates from original construction making the equipment approximately 31 years old. The

equipment has exceeded its useful life and is an inefficient way to heat the building. The entire

heating system will require replacement.

Controls

The building is currently controlled by a pneumatic control system dating from the original

construction. The control system is reported to be working but the level of actual control over

the system is unknown. Due to the age of the system, it is very likely that the control has

diminished since original installation and that portions of the system may not function. In

addition, current Linn County building standards utilize direct digital control systems. The

control system will need to be completely removed and replaced.

page 21 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

Fire Protection

The existing fire protection system was installed to meet the requirements of an open floor plan

department store. Conversion of the space to an office layout will change the sprinkler

requirements. In order to adequately protect the new layout, the existing sprinkler will need to

be completely demolished and a new system designed and installed.

page 22 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

Plumbing

The building contains plumbing from original construction along with new plumbing that was

added to meet the needs of the temporary reconstruction. Locations of restrooms and quantity

of fixtures will be modified if the space is remodeled resulting in the need to remove all existing

plumbing. The existing fixtures do not meet the water efficiency requirements of the Energy

Policy Act (Epact) of 1992 or the LEED rating system and they will need to be replaced with

more water efficient fixtures.

page 23 of 55
Project Constraints
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

Applicable Codes

As a County-owned facility, Linn County West is subject to applicable Linn County’ Codes:

• International Building Code (IBC), 2006 Edition as amended by the Linn County Board

of Supervisors;

• International Fire Code (IFC), 2006 Edition as amended by the Linn County Board of

Supervisors;

• Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC), 2003 Edition as amended by the Linn County Board of

Supervisors;

• ICC Electrical Code, 2006 Edition as amended by the Linn County Board of

Supervisors;

• Linn County Mechanical Regulations:

o International Mechanical Code (IMC), 2006 Edition as amended by the Linn

County Board of Supervisors;

o International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC), 2006 Edition as amended by the Linn

County Board of Supervisors.

The Cedar Rapids Zoning Ordinance applies to parking requirements. (Section 32.05.020

Parking Standards, B. Off-Street Parking Requirements, 2. Amounts of Off-Street parking

Required – See Table 32.05-4:Minimum Off-Street Parking Requirements for Office; business,

professional, or governmental not listed separately: 4 per 1,000 s.f. Gross Floor Area.) With a

gross floor area of 119,544 square feet, Linn County West is required to provide 479 off-street

parking spaces.

page 24 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

Easements and Agreements

The real estate associated with Linn County West is encumbered with a series of easements

and agreements that integrate the use of the building and land associated with Westdale Mall

with the building and parking areas belonging to Linn County West. These provisions grant each

party easements into, over and across each other’s land and define how the maintenance and

operation of common areas will be managed and paid for. Succession and assignment clauses

cause the easements and agreements to run with the land and to survive changes in ownership

until July 14, 2037.

Some of the key easements are:

• For the passage and parking of vehicles and accommodation of pedestrians;

• The right to eject persons not authorized to use the common area;

• For the installation, operation, maintenance, repair or relocation of underground utilites;

• For the purposes of development and construction.

Key agreements address common area development and maintenance and include:

• Proportional responsibility for costs associated with construction of improvements to the

common areas;

• Allocable Share of Common Area Maintenance Costs (CAM)

• Restrict designated employee parking to spaces at least 250 feet from the enclosed

mall;

• Process for withdrawing a tract from the maintenance and operation provisions of the

agreement for the common areas;

page 25 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

• Required parking ratio (5.3 automobile parking spaces for each 1,000 gross square feet

of floor area = (119,544 g.s.f. / 1,000 g.s.f) x 5.3 = 634 automobile parking spaces.);

• Membership in the Merchants Association;

• Maximum development of floor area for Linn County West limited to 126,000 square

feet;

• Signage characteristics;

Some costs to Linn County West associated with the Common Area Maintenance (CAM)

provisions are known. For the purposes of this study, the CAM assessments will be assigned

the value of $50,000 annually. Other costs, such as the dues for membership in the Merchants

Association are unknown and not factored into the operating costs addressed in this study.

If Linn County were to pursue making the former Wards store into permanent County offices, it

may want to open negotiations with the Mall operator over issues such as membership in the

Merchants Association and its share of CAM fees. The CAM fees are structured on the

assumption that every property or tenant associated with the mall benefits equally per square

foot from the amenities of the enclosed mall. This may have been true when all of the occupants

were retail businesses that depended for their revenues on the traffic these amenities

generated. The County enjoys no such benefit, and in fact may help to generate traffic to the

benefit of its neighbors at the mall.

page 26 of 55
LEED
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

LEED Silver Certification

Linn County has set a goal for the renovation of Linn County West to be certified with a LEED

Silver rating. The LEED® (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Green Building

Rating System is a voluntary, third-party certification process that evaluates projects using a

consensus-based rating system for the design, construction and operation of high-performance

green buildings. “LEED 2009 for New Construction and Major Renovations”, recently published

by the U.S. Green Building Council, provides the criteria used by this study.

LEED has four levels of certification:

Certified, Silver, Gold and Platinum.

A project must earn 50-59 of the

possible 100 points available in the

rating system to achieve LEED Silver certification. Key areas evaluated in the certification

process include “Sustainable Site Development”, “Energy Efficiency”, “Indoor Environmental

Quality”, “Water Efficiency” and “Materials and Resources”.

The Linn County West renovation project offers many opportunities to make improvements in

each of these areas. A preliminary tabulation of the potential LEED points this project could

earn indicates that the Linn County West renovation can achieve LEED Silver certification with

55 LEED points. See Appendix A.

page 27 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

Sustainable Site Development

(21 LEED Points Anticipated)

The site scores very well in the categories of good community connectivity and access to public

transportation with no effort. Linn County West can earn five points for its location alone: It is

located on a previously developed site. It is within ½ mile of a residential neighborhood

averaging ten housing units per acre. It is within ½ mile of at least ten basic services and has

pedestrian access between Linn County West and those basic services. Another six points is

earned because two Cedar Rapids Transit bus routes, Route #10 and Route #12, run to

Westdale Mall and have stops within ¼ mile walking distance from the front entrance of Linn

County West.

The project can earn an additional LEED point by providing bicycle storage for at least 5% of all

of the building users in conjunction with providing shower and changing facilities for ½% of the

building’s full-time equivalent employees. Another three LEED points can be earned by

reserving 5% of the parking spaces for low-emitting and fuel efficient vehicles and locating those

reserved spaces closest to building entrances. (Spaces reserved for handicapped persons will

always have precedence in being located close to building entrances over other kinds of

reserved parking.)

Choices made regarding the design of the proposed roof replacement and re-pavement of the

parking areas can result in a reduction of the heat island effect and possibly earn another two

LEED points. Choosing parking lot lighting fixtures that direct light downward and do not bleed

light off of the property will earn another point for Light Pollution Reduction.

page 28 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

Additional work could be done to reduce the rate of stormwater run-off from Linn County West,

and to improve the quality of stormwater discharged from the site. However, these

improvements would have a large impact on the project cost and only earn a maximum of two

LEED points, so they have not been included among the strategies being pursued in this study.

Water Efficiency

(6 LEED Points Anticipated)

Water use reduction by 20% is a prerequisite of the LEED certification. This study anticipates

reducing water use at Linn County West by 30% to earn two LEED points. All of the existing

plumbing fixtures, which are thirty years old, are proposed to be replaced with new, water-

conserving fixtures in the renovation.

The local plumbing Code does not permit the use of gray water for flushing toilets. Further

reductions in water use can be achieved, however, by selecting plant materials for landscape

areas that require little or no irrigation and by using only collected rainwater for the irrigation that

does occur. The project could earn an additional four LEED points for eliminating the need for

using potable water for landscape support.

Energy & Atmosphere

(13 LEED Points Anticipated)

LEED has three prerequisites that must be met before any

additional points are earned in the Energy and Atmosphere

category: Fundamental Commissioning must be performed to verify

that the project’s energy-related systems are installed and calibrated

page 29 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

to perform as intended. The renovated building’s energy performance must be 5% better than

the renovated building’s calculated baseline performance rating. The renovated building’s HVAC

system must use no CFC-based refrigerants.

Most of the LEED points to be gained under the category of Energy Efficiency will be found in

the sub-category of “Optimize Energy Performance”. Optimizing energy performance involves

the pursuit of strategies that improve a building’s energy performance beyond the standard of

the prerequisite. Strategies for optimizing a building’s energy performance include

improvements to the building envelope’s thermal performance, use of high-efficiency HVAC

systems, the use of high efficiency lighting fixtures, and the use of occupancy sensor controls

for lighting and ventilation. This study anticipates earning seven LEED points for optimizing Linn

County West’s energy performance.

Other strategies proposed for earning LEED credits under the category of Energy & Atmosphere

for Linn County West include Enhanced Commissioning, Enhanced Refrigeration Management

and Measurement & Verification.

Enhanced Commissioning involves an independent commissioning authority who reports

directly to the Owner early in the design process to lead, review and oversee the completion of

all commissioning process activities. The Commissioning Authority participates through the

construction period to review contractor submittals and to perform basic commissioning

services. Ten months after substantial completion the Commissioning Authority reviews

operation of the building and provides recommendations for fine-tuning or recalibration of

systems. Enhanced Refrigeration Management requires the selection of central HVAC

page 30 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

equipment that minimizes the use of ozone-depleting refrigerants and the implementation of an

equipment maintenance program to prevent refrigerant leakage. Measurement & Verification

requires the development and implementation of a plan to meter equipment and track energy

use against the predicted performance of the design. This study anticipates earning six more

LEED points for pursuing these strategies.

Materials and Resources

(2 LEED Points Anticipated)

The category of Materials and Resources awards LEED points for the recycling and re-use of

used materials, the incorporation of recycled materials into new work, the re-use of existing

buildings, minimizing the distance materials need to be transported and for the selection of

renewable products. It is the realization of the concept to “reduce, reuse, recycle” at the heart of

the green movement. The Linn County West Renovation project will pursue points under the

subcategories of Construction Waste management and Regional Materials.

Construction Waste management involves recycling or salvaging nonhazardous construction

and demolition debris. A construction waste management plan would be implemented to identify

materials that are to be diverted from the waste stream. For the Linn County West project

materials that could be diverted from the waste stream include: light gauge steel framing

members, hollow metal doors and frames, gypsum board, glass, aluminum storefront framing,

copper piping and cables, steel ceiling suspension grid, fired-clay brick, Portland concrete and

asphaltic concrete. It is assumed that these materials will easily constitute over 55% of the total

waste by weight generated for this project. Implementation of construction waste management

plan would earn the project one LEED point.

page 31 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

Regional Materials awards points for the incorporation of materials that are extracted and

manufactured within 500 miles of the project to minimize the impact of transporting materials. It

is assumed that at least 10% of the materials incorporated into the Linn County West

renovation, based on cost, will be from sources within that 500 mile radius earning one more

LEED point.

This study is not assuming that the Linn County West project will earn the any of the three

LEED points available for the re-use of an existing building. At least 55% of the original

building’s structure and envelope must be re-used to qualify for the first point. The Linn County

West renovation project may not meet this threshold because this study assumes that all of the

existing masonry veneer will be replaced to enhance the building’s thermal performance and

water infiltration management.

Indoor Environmental Quality

(8 LEED Points Anticipated)

The Indoor Environmental Quality credits support project choices that enhance the health and

well-being of building occupants through the reduction of indoor air pollutants, good ventilation,

reduction of indoor contaminants and provision of the means to isolate and filter those

contaminants that are present, the introduction of natural daylight into occupied spaces and

views to the outside.

This study focuses on those sub-categories addressing indoor air quality, control of lighting

systems by occupants and thermal comfort for strategies to earn LEED points. The HVAC

system for the Linn County West renovation is assumed to include a building automation system

page 32 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

that monitors air flow and carbon dioxide levels, and issues a warning when measurements vary

by more than 10%. Monitoring outdoor air delivery in this way earns one LEED point.

Implementing an indoor air quality plan during construction is important because the facility will

be occupied throughout construction, and it will earn the project one more LEED point.

Specifying low-emitting adhesives and sealants, paints and coatings, and carpet systems

reduces the contamination of indoor air with volatile organic compounds (VOC) and earns

another three LEED points for the project.

Providing control of lighting to individual occupants or groups of occupants allows them to tailor

their light usage to their particular needs and earls one more LEED point for the project.

Providing occupant control for thermal comfort may be achieved through multiple strategies

including the use of individual thermostat controls, operable windows, manual diffuser dampers

and control of individual radiant panels. Enabling a minimum of 50% of the building’s occupants

to make adjustments to meet their individual needs and preferences will earn Linn County West

one LEED point.

This study also assumes that the Linn County

West renovation will be designed with an HVAC

system and building envelope meeting the

requirements of ASHRAE Standard 55-2004,

Thermal Comfort Conditions for Human

page 33 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

Occupancy, earning one LEED point. The HVAC system would include a permanent monitoring

system to measure and track the building’s performance against design comfort criteria to

provide verification. Verification would be also be provided by a thermal comfort survey

proposed to occur six to eighteen months after occupancy to assess overall occupant

satisfaction with the thermal performance of the building or to identify thermal comfort-related

problems. These verification efforts will earn Linn County West one additional LEED point.

This study assumes that daylighting will be greatly enhanced at Linn County West by the

introduction of many windows and some skylights to a building that has virtually none now.

However, the geometry of the building makes it very difficult to meet the threshold to earn

additional LEED points for daylighting and views. This study does not assume any LEED points

will be earned under these subcategories.

Innovation in Design

(1 LEED Point Anticipated)

The Innovation in Design category provides one LEED point that should be a given on any project

seeking LEED certification: one LEED point for having a LEED accredited professional on the

design team. There are additional points that can be earned under this category for innovative

design. This study assumes that the point for including a LEED accredited professional is earned,

but does not assume any innovative design credits are earned.

page 34 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

Regional Priority

(4 LEED Points Anticipated)

Regional Priority credits can are bonus points awarded in addition to the base 100 points available.

Up to four Regional Priority credits can be earned by obtaining the LEED credits for categories that

have been identified by the USGBC regional council as having special environmental importance

for that region. The following categories have been designated as regional priorities in the area of

Linn County West:

• Sustainable Sites Credit 2: Development Density and Community Connectivity

• Sustainable Sites Credit 4.1: Alternate Transportation – Public Transportation Access

• Sustainable Sites Credit 4.2: Alternate Transportation – Bicycle Storage and Changing Rooms

• Sustainable Sites Credit 6.1: Stormwater Design – Quantity Control

• Water Efficiency Credit 2: Innovative Wastewater Technologies

• Materials & Resources Credit 2: Construction Waste Management

This study has already indicated anticipation that Linn County West will earn the available points for

four of the identified regional priorities: Development Density and Community Connectivity, for

Alternate Transportation – Public Transportation Access, for Alternate Transportation – Bicycle

Storage and Changing Rooms and for Construction Waste Management. Linn County West should,

therefore, qualify for the associated LEED points for Regional Priority.

It has been determined that a LEED Silver Rating is very achievable for the Linn County West

project. If the County chose to pursue all of the credits identified in this study as having a

moderate impact on the design for Linn County West, a total of 79 points could be earned for a

possible LEED Gold rating.

page 35 of 55
Renovation Scope
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

Renovation Scope

The scope of construction work required to achieve the goals of this renovation is assumed as

follows:

Site Work

This study assumes that all of the parking area and drives paved with asphalt will be repaved as

part of the Linn County West renovation. Two different strategies for replacing the pavement

were given consideration. The first strategy is the most basic: simply repave those areas

currently paved with asphalt with new asphalt. The second strategy considered the potential for

improving the site’s stormwater retention by replacing 20% of the traditional asphalt paving with

a permeable pavement system. The construction cost for pursuing the second strategy was

42% greater than repaving with traditional asphalt. The goal of earning LEED Silver certification

for this project can be accomplished without incurring the cost of installing the permeable

pavement. For this study it is assumed that permeable pavement is not used.

Some additional green space will be obtained by the elimination of part of the truck well outside

of the loading docks on the south side of the building’s upper floor. The truck loading dock built

to support shipments to the Montgomery Wards department store is greatly oversized for the

operation of a county office building. Of the six existing loading bays, one is dedicated for refuse

collection and five are set up for loading and unloading semi trucks. At least three of the bays

will be converted to other uses and about 1,700 square feet of pavement front of them will be

demolished to create the new garden area.

page 36 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

Building Demolition

Demolition of the existing finishes, partitions, fixtures and equipment will be extensive. This

study assumes that the roofing will be torn-off down to the metal roof deck. The exterior wythe

of masonry will be removed, but the steel back-up framing will be retained. The existing

entrance porches and their structure would also be removed. All interior partition framing and

gypsum board, finishes, plumbing, lights and equipment would be removed. The escalators

would be removed. The existing passenger elevator would also be removed. The existing fire

sprinkler system would be removed. And finally, the existing HVAC system and all of its

ductwork would be removed.

Building Construction

The building envelope will require a great deal of work. A new built-up roofing system will be

installed with insulation to raise the roof’s R-value to 30. A “green” roofing system was

considered, but discarded for this study. The existing roof structure would need to be enhanced

to support the loads for a traditional “green” roof, and the LEED points available for this work

were not needed to achieve the goal of LEED Silver certification.

page 37 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

Insulation for the exterior walls will also be enhanced raising their R-value to 24. The exterior

walls would be reconstructed to manage water infiltration. Masonry walls would be constructed

as rain-screen cavity walls with a 1 ½” to 2” air space immediately behind the brick to intercept

water that penetrates the system and then channel it to flashings that redirect the water back to

the outside of the wall. A continuous 2” layer of rigid insulation board and a weather barrier are

located over the sheathing on the inboard side of the cavity to minimize thermal bridging at the

studs. Fiberglass batt insulation would be installed in the spaces between the existing 8” deep

steel studs. The wall would be finished with a continuous vapor barrier covered with 5/8”

gypsum board on the interior side.

The added insulation and air space required for the masonry rain-screen cavity walls requires

an additional 4” wall thickness. Because we are re-using the steel stud back-up framing in

place, that entire additional width is toward the outside of the wall. Where masonry rain-screen

walls are to be constructed for this project, therefore, foundations will need to be made 4”

thicker as well. Excavations to modify the foundations provide an opportunity to refresh

foundation damp proofing.

Not all of the existing masonry would be replaced with new masonry rain-screen cavity walls.

Introducing day lighting and views to the renovated building is part of the strategy for achieving

LEED Silver certification. Up to 40% of a wall can be opened as windows and still meet the

requirements of the Energy Code. Curtain wall rain-screen will be used in lieu of masonry in

some areas. Curtain wall provides the opportunity to introduce light and views, to manage water

infiltration and to enhance thermal performance without the need to make the foundation any

thicker.

page 38 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

The number of entrances would be reduced. The existing building has four large entrances on

the lower level, two facing north and two facing east, plus one large entrance to the upper level

from the south. This study assumes that there will be only two entrances on the lower level, one

from the north and one from the east, and one to the second level from the south. Each exterior

entrance will feature two pairs of glass doors in a glass and thermally broken aluminum

storefront fame with a second set of two pairs of glass doors in a glass and storefront frame to

create a vestibule.

The number of sanitary plumbing fixtures will be increased and public restrooms will be

relocated for more convenient access. Most of the restroom fixtures are currently located on the

lower level near the center of the south wall. Three single-user restrooms are currently located

on the upper level near the west end of the south wall. With all of the restrooms combined, the

existing fixture count does not satisfy the requirements of the Uniform Plumbing Code for Linn

County West’s occupant load. For the purposes of this study it is assumed that the renovation

will provide one public restroom for each sex centrally located on each level, one public family

page 39 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

restroom on each level located near the public restrooms, a staff restroom with a single shower

for each sex to be located near an employee lunch room and a private, unisex restroom located

near the Supervisors’ Board Room. A janitor’s closet with mop sink would be located on each

floor. Four pairs of drinking fountains would be located along corridors. Relocating plumbing

fixtures will entail cutting openings in the floor slab for installation of the new drains.

The escalators are to be removed because there is not enough

expected traffic to justify their continuous energy consumption

and because they represent a safety risk. During a visit to Linn

County West in preparation of this report, a senior citizen was

observed trying to descend on the escalator. He was unsteady

and having difficulty coordinating his step with the movement

of the escalator. In his first attempt he nearly pitched forward

down the steps. Before he tried again, one of the observers

suggested that he may prefer using the passenger elevator.

He was grateful to find out that there was a passenger

elevator. He had looked for one, but couldn’t find it. For the renovation, we are proposing that

the escalators be replaced with a new, centrally located elevator, and that the two levels of Linn

County West should be connected with a new, centrally located open stairway.

page 40 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

Power Distribution and Grounding

The electrical service will consist of a new 277/480,

electrical service with new distribution to mechanical

equipment, lighting panels and 120/208 volt branch

panels. Branch panels are to have 200% rated neutrals

for non-linear loads. All dry-type transformers are to be


EIA/TIA 607 Telecommunications
NEMA T-3 energy efficient, and K-rated. Feeds will be Grounding Bars

designed for a 2% max voltage drop. Surge protective devices (SPDs) will be provided

on the main switchboard and all 120/208 volt branch panels. A dedicated transformer

and branch panel will be provided for the main telecommunication room in accordance

with EIA/TIA 568.

A new grounding electrode system will be established and telecommunications

grounding system will be installed in accordance with EIA/TIA 607.

All conduits will be provided with an equipment ground conductor.

Emergency Power

The emergency power system will be capable of supplying power to the entire facility. A

diesel driven engine-generator will be housed in a walk in weatherproof enclosure with a

24 hour base mounted fuel tank. A closed-transition transfer switch will allow power to

page 41 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

be switched from source to source without interruption of power, allowing the facility to

be on an interruptible electrical rate, or control their electrical demand.

Lighting

A new fluorescent lighting system will be

designed to work with a new task lighting

system and provide an overall lighting

system with a power density of 0.75 watts

per square foot exceeding ASHRAE 90.1

and applicable Energy Codes. The High Performance T8 Lighting

lighting system will utilize high-performance T8 lamp and ballast combination and LED

task lighting.

LED Task Lighting

page 42 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

A lighting control system incorporating daylighting control, occupancy sensors and

schedules will control the lighting system. Architectural lighting will be installed at select

public areas.

Exterior lighting will be designed to exceed energy code requirements. All exterior lights

will be full cut-off.

Telecommunications Infrastructure

The telecommunications infrastructure will be in accordance with EIA/TIA 568 and 569.

Category 6 cables will be routed through a cable tray system to a central

telecommunications room. Intermediate communication rooms will be provided as

required to meet EIA/TIA 568. Telecommunications shall be complete from the outlet to

the patch panel.

Access Control System and Closed Circuit Television

An Access Control System (ACS) using the County’s approved vendor will be installed.

The ACS will utilize proximity card readers to control exterior doors and select interior

doors. A total of 16 controlled doors are anticipated. An IP based closed circuit

television system will be interfaced with the access control system to record activity at

select controlled doors. Additional cameras will monitor public areas and public

transaction counters. A total of 16 cameras are anticipated.

page 43 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

Fire Alarm / Mass Notification System

A new addressable fire alarm system with voice annunciation

will be installed. Smoke detection will be limited to select

areas. The sprinkler system will be monitored and duct smoke

detectors will be installed where required. The mass

notification system will be capable of distributing an audible


Fire Alarm with
Voice Notification
message throughout the facility.

HVAC System

The new heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system will consist of variable air

volume built up air handling units. The units will contain full energy recovery wheels that will

transfer thermal energy from the exhaust air stream to the outside air stream. The full energy

recovery wheels will decrease the energy costs associated with bringing outside air into the

building and will help the building obtain LEED silver certification. In addition, the units will have

full economizer capability in order to use cool, dry outside air for cooling when outside air

temperatures are suitable. This feature also helps to reduce the energy usage of the building

and contributes toward LEED silver certification. The fans on the air handling units will have

variable frequency drives that will vary the fan speed in response to building heating and cooling

demands. Variable air volume boxes with and without hot water re-heat coils will be located

throughout the building to provide individual temperature control for spaces.

The units will be equipped with outside air dampers to provide the amount of outside air

required by ASHRAE standard 62.1 in order to maintain acceptable indoor air quality for the

building. The units will use an energy saving feature called demand controlled ventilation to

page 44 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

determine the required amount of outside air during different levels of occupancy. The outside

damper will modulate to allow more or less outside air depending on the concentration of carbon

dioxide in the return air stream. This feature reduces energy consumption by delivering only the

needed outside air to the building.

Cooling for the building will be provided by two water-cooled

frictionless bearing centrifugal chillers, with each chiller

sized for 65 percent of the load. The chillers will provide

chilled water to each of the air handling units. The

condenser water will be cooled by a fiberglass cooling tower

located on the roof of the building. The frictionless chillers

exceed current energy code requirements for full-load and Centrifugal Chiller

part-load energy efficiency and will reduce the electrical usage of the building. The chillers also

use the environmentally friendly refrigerant R-134a which does not deplete the ozone and is not

currently subject to a phase-out schedule.

The building will be heated with gas-fired condensing hot water boilers. The boilers will provide

hot water to pre-heat coils located in the air handling units and re-heat coils located in variable

air volume boxes to allow for individual temperature control. Condensing boilers have

combustion efficiencies near 98 percent and will reduce the cost to heat the building.

Condensing boilers far exceed the energy code required efficiency for boilers and will contribute

to the building earning LEED silver certification.

page 45 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

The computer/communication rooms will be cooled by a high efficiency dedicated computer

room air conditioning unit designed to operate year round. Each room will also have a variable

air volume box to provide backup cooling in the event that the computer room air conditioner

fails.

A ground source geothermal heat pump system was also evaluated for the Linn County West

Building. The current parking lot is in disrepair and will need to be replaced creating the

opportunity to install the borefield underneath the parking lot. A ground source geothermal

system has the potential to provide energy savings in addition to those provided by the system

described above. For purposes of this study, the built up air handling unit system with water

cooled chillers was used in order to maintain consistency with the proposed design for the

Administrative Office Building. The Weidt Group has been hired by MidAmerican Energy and

Alliant Energy to review the feasibility of installing a ground source geothermal system at the

Administrative Office Building and to investigate what potential rebates would be available from

the utilities.

Controls

The HVAC controls system will be a complete direct digital control system. The system will

control all of the HVAC equipment and to provide a central point of control for the building. The

control system will also reduce energy consumption by allowing for scheduling of occupied and

occupied periods. During unoccupied periods, temperatures will be reset to warmer

temperatures in the summer and cooling temperatures in the winter.

page 46 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

Plumbing System

The new plumbing system will incorporate dual-flush toilets, low-flow

urinals, low-flow faucets, and low-flow showerheads to reduce the

building water consumption. The plumbing system will be designed to

meet the requirements of the Uniform Plumbing Code (2003). The

building will also feature a rainwater collection system that will collect

rainwater from the roof of the building and store for landscape irrigation.

The reduction of water usage by these strategies will help achieve the
Dual Flush Flushometer
LEED silver rating for the building.

Hot water for lavatories will be provided by instantaneous tankless water heaters located

underneath the lavatories. Tankless water heaters reduce the energy usage for hot water and

will help the facility to achieve the LEED silver certification. The restroom containing the shower

facilities will require an electric tank-type hot water heat to provide sufficient hot water to the

showers. Using this combination of point-of-use hot water heaters eliminates the cost of

installing hot water piping throughout the facility and eliminates the energy consumption of a hot

water circulation system.

Fire Protection

A new sprinkler system will be installed to meet the light-hazard occupancy classification of the

office areas and will be appropriately design to protect storage areas. The new system will be

designed in accordance with the International Fire Code 2006

page 47 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

Sequence of the Work

Because the building will be occupied and open to the public throughout the renovation, the

demolition and subsequent construction will need to occur in a piecemeal fashion. It is assumed

that all of the departments scheduled to be relocated to alternate facilities have completed that

move before demolition begins, which leaves the upper level vacant except for Purchasing and

the Mail Room. The area on the lower floor currently occupied by the Courts, the Clerk of Court

and Juvenile Probation will also be vacated. Having these large areas vacated prior to

construction will facilitate the process by allowing the renovation to be completed in one area

before a department is relocated to its new permanent office space, opening the next area for

construction.

There are costs associated with staging a renovation project in this fashion. Construction

moves slower, so the fixed monthly costs to the contractor, collectively known as general

conditions costs, are greater. Although precautions are taken, there is greater risk that an

employee of the county or a member of the public could be injured as the result of construction

activity, so insurance premiums are a little higher. There is no easy way to demolish the heating,

ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC) system and install a new one without affecting the

offices served. This study anticipates the contractor renting and installing, and eventually

removing, a temporary HVAC system to condition occupied spaces during the transition from

the building’s old to new mechanical system.

page 48 of 55
Opinion of Cost
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

Opinion of Renovation Cost

Howard R. Green Company has prepared a preliminary opinion of construction cost for the

renovation of Linn County West into permanent County offices. Assumptions underlying our

opinion of the cost of the work are discussed in the sections of this study titled “Renovation

Scope” and “Sequence of Work”. Table 3 provides a detail summary of the opinion of

construction cost.

page 49 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

Table 3: Preliminary Opinion of Construction Cost

page 50 of 55
Annual Energy Costs
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

Anticipated Annual Energy Costs

The energy costs for operating a building are estimated using the actual rates charged by

utilities applied to a building model that simulates the consumption of electricity and gas to heat,

cool, ventilate, light and operate incidental equipment in the building. For budgeting and

comparison purposes these costs are typically aggregated as annual costs.

HR Green utilized the Carrier E20-II load calculation and simulation program to estimate energy

usage and costs for the Linn County West building over a period of one year. The building

model incorporated the proposed new mechanical and electrical systems discussed in this

report and also included all proposed architectural changes. The following assumptions were

also used in the analysis.

• Only office equipment plug loads were included in the analysis. Office equipment plug

loads included computers, monitors, printer & copiers. Computers and monitors were

assumed to be in sleep/stand-by mode during hours when the building in unoccupied.

• Space usage and occupancy levels are similar to the current layout at Linn County West.

Offices were assumed to be occupied from approximately 8am to 5pm, Monday through

Friday and conference rooms were assumed to be occupied sporadically throughout the

day.

• Lighting levels were set at 0.75 watts per square foot.

• Entrance snow melting energy usage was not included in the analysis.

• Exterior lighting and elevator electrical usage were not included in the analysis.

• Building temperatures set points of 74/80 were used for occupied/unoccupied periods

during the summer and 70/64 during the winter.

page 51 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

• Electric rates used were for Large General Service from Interstate Power and Light

Company as listed in the Electric Tariff dated March 17, 2009.

• Gas rate - $1.00 per therm.

• Historical weather data for Cedar Rapids was input to simulate average weather

conditions for the entire year.

Using these assumptions, the annual energy cost for the renovated Linn County West building

is estimated to be approximately $77,500 per year. The complete energy usage and costs

report is found in Appendix B.

page 52 of 55
Life Cycle Analysis
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

Life Cycle Analysis

A life cycle cost is a number representing the cost of owning and operating a building over a set

period of time for the purpose of comparing different buildings or different building strategies.

Calculation of the life cycle cost considers the initial investment in construction costs, the cost of

energy to operate the building, the cost of maintenance and effect of inflation on those costs

over the life period. These costs are distilled into a single index called the “total present worth”.

By itself, the calculated total present worth is not a very meaningful number; it becomes

meaningful when compared to the total present worth of an alternate that has been analyzed

using similar assumptions.

HR Green utilized the Carrier Engineering Economic Analysis program to determine the life

cycle cost of the Linn County West Building. The estimated annual energy costs were imported

from the annual energy use analysis. Increases in energy, labor and material costs over time

are estimated by using escalation rates to inflate future costs. In order to perform the analysis

the following assumptions were used.

• Length of Analysis – 25 years

• Discount Rate – 4 %

• Energy Costs Escalation Rate – 2.6 %

• Maintenance Cost Escalation Rate – 1.8 %

• Equipment Cost Escalation Rate – 1.8 %

• HVAC system maintenance costs were calculated in accordance with the 1999 ASHRAE

Applications Handbook Chapter 35 and the ASHRAE Owning and Operating Cost

Database based on ASHRAE Research Project 1237-TRP.

• Equipment Useful Life – Obtained from ASHRAE useful life data

page 53 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

• Annual common area maintenance (CAM) Fee of $50,000 per year

The life cycle cost analysis estimated the total present worth of the Linn County West building to

be $19,409,030. The total present worth is the combination of the estimated initial construction

cost of $15,289,000 and the estimated annual operating cost of $207,360. Operating expenses

for each year of the analysis are discounted into today’s dollars using the discount rate in order

to calculate the total present worth. The life cycle cost report is found in Appendix C.

page 54 of 55
Summary
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009

Summary

Extensive work is required to adapt the former Montgomery Wards department store into

permanent County offices. Only the building’s frame, floor slabs, roof decking and side-wall

back-up framing are salvageable for re-use.

The Linn County West renovation project can achieve a LEED Silver certification in support of

the County’s “green” building initiative.

The renovation can be sequenced so that County offices currently housed at Linn County West

and intended to remain there can remain open to the public throughout the construction period,

provided that the offices intended for relocation to other sites have completed their transitions.

Howard R. Green Company has developed a preliminary opinion of construction costs for the

renovation totaling $15,289,000.

Annual energy costs are expected to be about $77,500 for the renovated building.

The current annual Common Area Maintenance (CAM) fees are about $50,000. If Linn County

elects to pursue renovation of Linn County West, then the CAM fees should be renegotiated to

better reflect the how the County is or is not benefitted by the amenities supported by the fees.

A life cycle cost analysis results in Linn County West having a calculated total present worth of

about $19,409,000.

page 55 of 55
Appendix A
Linn County West - LEED Feasibility Calculation

Administration
Base Maximum
Feasible Number of Number of
Remarks:
Y/N/? Points Credits
Anticipated Anticipated
Credit Pts
Sustainable Sites
Prereq 1 0 Construction Activities Pollution Prevention Y 0 0 Mandatory - provide a construction activities pollution prevention plan
Credit 1 1 Site Selection Y 1 1 Existing site meets the criteria for site selection
Credit 2 5 Development Density & Community Connectivity Y 5 5 Existing site has access to services to meet community connectivity standard
Credit 3 1 Brownfield Redevelopment N 0 0 This site is not considered a Brownfield site
Credit 4.1 6 Alt. Transportation: Public Transportation Y 6 6 Existing bus routes service this site
Credit 4.2 1 Alt Tran: Bicycle Storage & Changing Rooms ? 1 1 Provide bike racks and showers, included in AOB design
Credit 4.3 3 Alt Tran: Low-Emitting & Fuel Efficient Vehicles Y 3 3 Provide designated parking spaces for low-emitting and fuel efficient vehicles
Credit 4.4 2 Alt Tran: Parking Capacity Y 2 2 No new parking or reduce the number of existing parking spaces
To achieve this credit a large portion of the parking lot would need to be converted to green space or the
Credit 5.1 1 Site Development: Protect & Restore Habitat N 0 0
roof would need to be restructured to support a green roof
To achieve this credit a large portion of the parking lot would need to be converted to green space or the
Credit 5.2 1 Site Development: Maximize Open Space N 0 0
roof would need to be restructured to support a green roof
Credit 6.1 1 Storm Water: Quantity Control ? 0 1 Decrease the existing storm water run off by 25% - collect roof & pervious paving
Credit 6.2 1 Storm Water: Quality Control ? 0 1 Pervious paving and sand filtration basins at perimeter and medians or vegetated filter strip
Credit 7.1 1 Heat Island Effect: Non-roof Y 1 1 Specify light colored or pervious paving in parking lot
Credit 7.2 1 Heat Island Effect: Roof Y 1 1 Specify light colored roof surface
Credit 8 1 Light Pollution Reduction Y 1 1 Design choices for site lighting and internal lighting to minimize light pollution
Sustainable Sites Points Anticipated 21 23
Water Efficiency
Prereq 1 0 Water Use Reduction: 20% Y 0 0 Low flow fixtures choices
Credit 1.1 2 Water Efficient Landscaping: 50% reduction Y 2 2 Use collected rain water & use drought tolerant plants
Credit 1.2 2 Water Efficient Landscaping: No Potable Water Y 2 2 Use collected rain water & use drought tolerant plants
Credit 2 2 Innovative Wastewater Technologies ? 0 2 Water conserving fixtures & use collected rain water
Credit 3 4 Water Use Reduction Y 2 4 Water conserving fixtures & use collected rain water
Water Efficiency Points Anticipated 6 10
Energy & Atmosphere
Prereq 1 0 Fundamental Commissioning Y 0 0 Mandatory - provide base commissioning for the project
Prereq 2 0 Minimum Energy Performance Y 0 0 Mandatory - exceed ASHREA 90.1 2007 standards by 5%
Prereq 3 0 Fundamental Refrigerant Management Y 0 0 Mandatory - no CFC are currently being used in the building
Credit 1 19 Optimize Energy Performance Y 7 11 Improved thermal performance of building envelope, high efficiency system
Credit 2 7 On-Site Renewable Energy N 0 0 To achieve this credit solar panels or wind generators would need to be installed
Credit 3 2 Enhanced Commissioning Y 2 2 Contract for full commissioning services, which is a wise choice for a public building this size
Credit 4 2 Enhanced Refrigerant Management Y 2 2 HVAC system choices, ground source heat pump
Credit 5 3 Measurement & Verification Y 3 3 Develop and implement a measurement and verification plan
Negotiate with utility provider to purchase a percentage of power as green power. While the impact on the
Credit 6 2 Green Power ? 0 2 project is minimal, the requirement to make a long term commitment that effects operating costs makes
this credit less desirable.
Energy & Atmosphere Points Anticipated 14 20
Administration
Base Maximum
Feasible Number of Number of
Comments: estimated task needed to achieve this credit
Y/N/? Points Credits
Anticipated Anticipated
Materials & Resources
Prereq 1 0 Storage & Collection of Recyclables Y 0 0 Space assigned for recycling and signs
Credit 1.1 3 Building Reuse: Maintain Existing Walls, Floors, Roof ? 0 2 Reuse building structure and shell, minus opening for improving natural light levels
Credit 1.2 1 Building Reuse: 50% Non-Structural Elements N 0 0 To achieve this credit 50% of interior elements would need to be reused
Credit 2 2 Construction Waste Management Y 1 2 Specifications to require recycling of waste during construction
Credit 3 2 Material Reuse N 0 0 Specify salvaged materials be used on the project
Credit 4 2 Recycled Content: ? 0 2 Specify products with recycled content
Credit 5 2 Regional Materials: Y 1 2 Specify products produced within a 500 mile radius of the site
Credit 6 1 Rapidly Renewable Materials N 0 0 Specify products made from plants that are harvested within a 10-year or shorter cycle.
Credit 7 1 Certified Wood N 0 0 Specify wood that is certified by the Forestry Stewardship Council
Materials & Resources Points Anticipated 2 8
Indoor Environmental Quality
Prereq 1 0 Minimum IAQ Performance Y 0 0 Code requires this level of IAQ
Prereq 2 0 Environmental Tobacco Smoke Control Y 0 0 State law requires ETSC
Credit 1 1 Outdoor Air delivery Monitoring Y 1 1 Include outdoor air monitoring in mechanical system
Additional ventilation is required by code, but the level to achieve this credit would have a negative impact
Credit 2 1 Increased Ventilation N 0 0
on EA credit 1
Credit 3.1 1 Const. IAQ Management Plan: During Const. Y 1 1 Control filtration per standards and documentation
Credit 3.2 1 Const. IAQ Management Plan: Before Occupancy ? 0 1 Slow flush of building while occupied
Credit 4.1 1 Low-emitting Materials: Adhesive & sealants Y 1 1 Specify products with low VOC's
Credit 4.2 1 Low-emitting Materials: Paints & coatings Y 1 1 Specify products with low VOC's
Credit 4.3 1 Low-emitting Materials: Carpet systems Y 1 1 Specify products with low VOC's
Credit 4.4 1 Low-emitting Materials: Composite Wood N 0 0 Specify composite wood products that have no urea-formaldehyde resins
Credit 5 1 Indoor Chemical & Pollutant Source Control ? 0 1 Design building to standards outlined in this credit description
Credit 6.1 1 Controllability of Systems: Lighting Y 1 1 Provide controllable task lighting for work spaces
Credit 6.2 1 Controllability of Systems: Thermal Comfort N 0 0 Additional zones for the HVAC system
Credit 7.1 1 Thermal Comfort: Design Y 1 1 Build to the design standard of this credit for the mechanical system
Credit 7.2 1 Thermal Comfort: Verification Y 1 1 Conduct a post occupancy survey
Credit 8.1 1 Daylight & Views: 75% of spaces (light level) ? 0 1 Increase natural light levels through windows and skylights
The shape of the building does not lend itself to providing view to the outside for the required percentage of
Credit 8.2 1 Daylight & Views: 90% of spaces (view to outside) N 0 0
the building
Indoor Environmental Quality Points Anticipated 8 11
Innovation & Design
Credit 1 5 Innovation in Design ? 0 2 Possible place to pick up some points if needed
Credit 2 1 LEED AP Y 1 1 Have a LEED AP on design staff
Innovation & Design Points Anticipated 1 3
Regional Priority
Credit 1 4 Regional Priority Credit 4 4
SS 2 Development Density & Community Connectivity Y
Up to 4 points can be achieved for Regional Priority. An additional point is awarded to the project for
SS 4.1 Alt. Transportation: Public Transportation Y
achieving the credits determined by the USGBC as important for the area. The credits listed are the
SS 4.2 Alt Tran: Bicycle Storage & Changing Rooms ?
credits that are eligible for regional priority for this site. Of the 6 available, we have determined that 2 are
SS 6.1 Storm Water: Quantity Control ?
easy to achieve and 4 have a moderate impact on the project and should be considered.
WE 2 Innovative Wastewater Technologies ?
MR 2 Construction Waste Management (75%) ?
Regional Priority Points Anticipated 4 4
Total 110 56 79
O:\PROJ\196530J\REPORT\images & additional documentation\[LEED_NC v.3 cost spreadsheet.XLS]Sheet1
Appendix B
Annual Cost Summary
Linn County - Feasibility Study Model 09/21/2009
Howard R. Green Company 11:28AM

Table 1. Annual Costs


Linn County West
Component ($)
Air System Fans 7,784
Cooling 7,248
Heating 7,445
Pumps 4,011
Cooling Tower Fans 4,341
HVAC Sub-Total 30,829
Lights 28,161
Electric Equipment 17,495
Misc. Electric 879
Misc. Fuel Use 0
Non-HVAC Sub-Total 46,535
Grand Total 77,364

Table 2. Annual Cost per Unit Floor Area


Linn County West
Component ($/ft²)
Air System Fans 0.069
Cooling 0.064
Heating 0.066
Pumps 0.036
Cooling Tower Fans 0.039
HVAC Sub-Total 0.274
Lights 0.250
Electric Equipment 0.155
Misc. Electric 0.008
Misc. Fuel Use 0.000
Non-HVAC Sub-Total 0.413
Grand Total 0.687
Gross Floor Area (ft²) 112683.0
Conditioned Floor Area (ft²) 112683.0
Note: Values in this table are calculated using the Gross Floor Area.

Table 3. Component Cost as a Percentage of Total Cost


Linn County West
Component (%)
Air System Fans 10.1
Cooling 9.4
Heating 9.6
Pumps 5.2
Cooling Tower Fans 5.6
HVAC Sub-Total 39.8
Lights 36.4
Electric Equipment 22.6
Misc. Electric 1.1
Misc. Fuel Use 0.0
Non-HVAC Sub-Total 60.2
Grand Total 100.0

Hourly Analysis Program v.4.4 Page 1 of 1


Annual Component Costs - Linn County West
Linn County - Feasibility Study Model 09/21/2009
Howard R. Green Company 11:28AM

1.1% Misc. Electric


Air System Fans 10.1%
22.6% Electric Equipment

Cooling 9.4%

Heating 9.6%

Pumps 5.2%

Cooling Tower Fans 5.6%


36.4% Lights

1. Annual Costs
Annual Cost Percent of Total
Component ($) ($/ft²) (%)
Air System Fans 7,784 0.069 10.1
Cooling 7,248 0.064 9.4
Heating 7,445 0.066 9.6
Pumps 4,011 0.036 5.2
Cooling Tower Fans 4,341 0.039 5.6
HVAC Sub-Total 30,829 0.274 39.8
Lights 28,161 0.250 36.4
Electric Equipment 17,495 0.155 22.6
Misc. Electric 879 0.008 1.1
Misc. Fuel Use 0 0.000 0.0
Non-HVAC Sub-Total 46,535 0.413 60.2
Grand Total 77,364 0.687 100.0
Note: Cost per unit floor area is based on the gross building floor area.

Gross Floor Area 112683.0 ft²


Conditioned Floor Area 112683.0 ft²

Hourly Analysis Program v.4.4 Page 1 of 1


Annual Energy Costs - Linn County West
Linn County - Feasibility Study Model 09/21/2009
Howard R. Green Company 11:28AM

HVAC Electric 30.2%

60.1% Non-HVAC Electric

HVAC Natural Gas 9.6%

1. Annual Costs
Annual Cost Percent of Total
Component ($/yr) ($/ft²) (%)
HVAC Components
Electric 23,384 0.208 30.2
Natural Gas 7,444 0.066 9.6
Fuel Oil 0 0.000 0.0
Propane 0 0.000 0.0
Remote Hot Water 0 0.000 0.0
Remote Steam 0 0.000 0.0
Remote Chilled Water 0 0.000 0.0
HVAC Sub-Total 30,829 0.274 39.9
Non-HVAC Components
Electric 46,532 0.413 60.1
Natural Gas 0 0.000 0.0
Fuel Oil 0 0.000 0.0
Propane 0 0.000 0.0
Remote Hot Water 0 0.000 0.0
Remote Steam 0 0.000 0.0
Non-HVAC Sub-Total 46,532 0.413 60.1
Grand Total 77,361 0.687 100.0
Note: Cost per unit floor area is based on the gross building floor area.

Gross Floor Area 112683.0 ft²


Conditioned Floor Area 112683.0 ft²

Hourly Analysis Program v.4.4 Page 1 of 1


Monthly Component Costs - Linn County West
Linn County - Feasibility Study Model 09/21/2009
Howard R. Green Company 11:28AM

Air System Fans Cooling Heating Pumps

Cooling Tower Fans Lights Electric Equipment Misc. Electric

2500

2000
Cost ($)

1500

1000

500

0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Month
1. HVAC Component Costs
Air System Fans Cooling Heating Pumps Cooling Towers HVAC Total
Month ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($)
January 417 49 2,343 17 0 2,826
February 372 48 1,425 15 0 1,860
March 394 246 880 300 48 1,868
April 404 274 185 286 109 1,258
May 609 594 7 404 425 2,039
June 1,232 1,479 0 706 986 4,403
July 1,403 1,859 0 817 1,179 5,258
August 1,241 1,598 0 704 970 4,513
September 571 639 7 406 424 2,047
October 410 361 243 325 200 1,539
November 339 51 649 14 0 1,053
December 392 50 1,706 16 0 2,164
Total 7,784 7,248 7,445 4,011 4,341 30,829

2. Non-HVAC Component Costs


Electric
Lights Equipment Misc. Electric Misc. Fuel Use Non-HVAC Total Grand Total
Month ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($)
January 2,263 1,438 69 0 3,770 6,596
February 2,277 1,406 72 0 3,754 5,614
March 2,213 1,352 70 0 3,634 5,502
April 2,148 1,317 68 0 3,533 4,791
May 2,092 1,311 65 0 3,468 5,507
June 2,806 1,719 89 0 4,614 9,017
July 2,610 1,636 81 0 4,327 9,585
August 2,796 1,729 88 0 4,613 9,126
September 2,121 1,317 66 0 3,504 5,551
October 2,184 1,369 68 0 3,621 5,160
November 2,295 1,445 71 0 3,810 4,863
December 2,357 1,458 74 0 3,888 6,052
Total 28,161 17,495 879 0 46,535 77,364

Hourly Analysis Program v.4.4 Page 1 of 1


Monthly Energy Costs - Linn County West
Linn County - Feasibility Study Model 09/21/2009
Howard R. Green Company 11:28AM

HVAC Electric HVAC Natural Gas Non-HVAC Electric


5500
5000
4500
4000
3500
Cost ($)

3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Month
1. HVAC Costs
Remote Hot Remote Chilled
Electric Natural Gas Fuel Oil Propane Water Remote Steam Water
Month ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($)
January 484 2,343 0 0 0 0 0
February 435 1,425 0 0 0 0 0
March 989 880 0 0 0 0 0
April 1,072 185 0 0 0 0 0
May 2,032 7 0 0 0 0 0
June 4,403 0 0 0 0 0 0
July 5,258 0 0 0 0 0 0
August 4,513 0 0 0 0 0 0
September 2,040 7 0 0 0 0 0
October 1,297 243 0 0 0 0 0
November 404 649 0 0 0 0 0
December 458 1,706 0 0 0 0 0
Total 23,384 7,444 0 0 0 0 0

2. Non-HVAC Costs
Remote Hot
Electric Natural Gas Fuel Oil Propane Water Remote Steam
Month ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($)
January 3,770 0 0 0 0 0
February 3,754 0 0 0 0 0
March 3,634 0 0 0 0 0
April 3,532 0 0 0 0 0
May 3,467 0 0 0 0 0
June 4,613 0 0 0 0 0
July 4,326 0 0 0 0 0
August 4,613 0 0 0 0 0
September 3,504 0 0 0 0 0
October 3,621 0 0 0 0 0
November 3,810 0 0 0 0 0
December 3,888 0 0 0 0 0
Total 46,532 0 0 0 0 0

Hourly Analysis Program v.4.4 Page 1 of 1


Appendix C
Lifecycle Summary
Project: Linn County - Feasibility Study Model 9/22/2009
Prepared By: Howard R. Green Company 9:56:32 AM
Linn County West Life Cycle Cost Analysis
The purpose of this life cycle cost analysis is to determine the total present worth of the Linn County West Building. The
analysis includes the estimated initial construction cost, annual maintenance cost and annual energy costs.
Type of Analysis Public Sector Lifecycle Analysis
Type of Design Alternatives Mutually Exclusive
Length of Analysis 25 yrs
Discount Rate 4.00 %

Table 1. Executive Summary


Economic Criteria Best Design Case for Each Criteria Value ($)
Incremental SIR Analysis Linn County West -
Lowest Total Present Worth Linn County West $19,409,032
Lowest Annual Operating Cost Linn County West $207,360
Lowest First Cost Linn County West $15,289,000

Table 2. Design Cases Ranked by First Cost


Design Case Name Design Case Total Present Annual Operating First Cost ($)
Short Name Worth ($) Cost ($/yr)
Linn County West LCW $19,409,032 $207,360 $15,289,000

Table 3. Incremental Analysis Data


Challenger Base Case Additional NPW Savings SIR Payback
First Cost ($) ($) Period (yrs)
LCW [Winner] LCW [Winner] $0 $0 0.000 n/a

Engineering Economic Analysis v 3.0 Page 1 of 1


Cash Flow Details
Project: Linn County - Feasibility Study Model 9/22/2009
Prepared By: Howard R. Green Company 9:56:43 AM
Linn County West Life Cycle Cost Analysis
The purpose of this life cycle cost analysis is to determine the total present worth of the Linn County West Building. The analysis includes the estimated initial
construction cost, annual maintenance cost and annual energy costs.
Type of Analysis Public Sector Lifecycle Analysis
Type of Design Alternatives Mutually Exclusive
Length of Analysis 25 yrs
Discount Rate 4.00 %

1A. Component Cash Flows [Linn County West], Actual Value


Year Date Cash Loan Loan Interest Total Annual Non-Annual Total Total Cash
Investment ($) Principal ($) ($) Investment Operating Operating Operating Flow ($)
Cost ($) Cost ($) Cost ($) Cost ($)
0 Initial 15,289,000 0 0 15,289,000 0 0 0 15,289,000
1 1 0 0 0 0 211,711 0 211,711 211,711
2 2 0 0 0 0 216,157 0 216,157 216,157
3 3 0 0 0 0 220,699 0 220,699 220,699
4 4 0 0 0 0 225,340 0 225,340 225,340

Engineering Economic Analysis v 3.0 Page 1 of 3


Cash Flow Details
Project: Linn County - Feasibility Study Model 9/22/2009
Prepared By: Howard R. Green Company 9:56:43 AM
Year Date Cash Loan Loan Interest Total Annual Non-Annual Total Total Cash
Investment ($) Principal ($) ($) Investment Operating Operating Operating Flow ($)
Cost ($) Cost ($) Cost ($) Cost ($)
5 5 0 0 0 0 230,082 0 230,082 230,082
6 6 0 0 0 0 234,927 0 234,927 234,927
7 7 0 0 0 0 239,878 0 239,878 239,878
8 8 0 0 0 0 244,937 0 244,937 244,937
9 9 0 0 0 0 250,105 0 250,105 250,105
10 10 0 0 0 0 255,387 0 255,387 255,387
11 11 0 0 0 0 260,784 0 260,784 260,784
12 12 0 0 0 0 266,299 0 266,299 266,299
13 13 0 0 0 0 271,934 0 271,934 271,934
14 14 0 0 0 0 277,693 0 277,693 277,693
15 15 0 0 0 0 283,578 0 283,578 283,578
16 16 0 0 0 0 289,592 0 289,592 289,592
17 17 0 0 0 0 295,738 0 295,738 295,738
18 18 0 0 0 0 302,019 0 302,019 302,019
19 19 0 0 0 0 308,437 0 308,437 308,437
20 20 0 0 0 0 314,997 0 314,997 314,997
21 21 0 0 0 0 321,701 0 321,701 321,701
22 22 0 0 0 0 328,553 0 328,553 328,553
23 23 0 0 0 0 335,555 0 335,555 335,555
24 24 0 0 0 0 342,712 0 342,712 342,712
25 25 0 0 0 0 350,027 0 350,027 350,027
Totals 15,289,000 0 0 15,289,000 6,878,842 0 6,878,842 22,167,842

1B. Present Worth Cash Flows [Linn County West]


Year Date Total Investment Cost Total Operating Cost Total Present Worth
($) ($) ($)
0 Initial 15,289,000 0 15,289,000
1 1 0 203,569 203,569
2 2 0 199,849 199,849
3 3 0 196,201 196,201
4 4 0 192,622 192,622
5 5 0 189,111 189,111
6 6 0 185,667 185,667
7 7 0 182,288 182,288
8 8 0 178,973 178,973
9 9 0 175,721 175,721
10 10 0 172,530 172,530
Engineering Economic Analysis v 3.0 Page 2 of 3
Cash Flow Details
Project: Linn County - Feasibility Study Model 9/22/2009
Prepared By: Howard R. Green Company 9:56:43 AM
Year Date Total Investment Cost Total Operating Cost Total Present Worth
($) ($) ($)
11 11 0 169,400 169,400
12 12 0 166,329 166,329
13 13 0 163,317 163,317
14 14 0 160,361 160,361
15 15 0 157,461 157,461
16 16 0 154,616 154,616
17 17 0 151,824 151,824
18 18 0 149,085 149,085
19 19 0 146,397 146,397
20 20 0 143,761 143,761
21 21 0 141,173 141,173
22 22 0 138,635 138,635
23 23 0 136,144 136,144
24 24 0 133,699 133,699
25 25 0 131,301 131,301
Totals 15,289,000 4,120,034 19,409,034

Engineering Economic Analysis v 3.0 Page 3 of 3


Study Inputs
Project: Linn County - Feasibility Study Model 9/22/2009
Prepared By: Howard R. Green Company 9:56:53 AM

Study Title Linn County West Life Cycle Cost Analysis


Study Description :
The purpose of this life cycle cost analysis is to determine the total
present worth of the Linn County West Building. The analysis includes
the estimated initial construction cost, annual maintenance cost and
annual energy costs.

Type of Analysis Public Sector Lifecycle Analysis


Type of Design Alternatives Mutually Exclusive
Base Year 1
Currency Symbol $
Length of Analysis 25 yrs
Discount Rate 4.00 %

Engineering Economic Analysis v 3.0 Page 1 of 1


Cedar Rapids, IA New Lenox, IL
8710 Earhart Lane SW 323 Alana Drive
P.O. Box 9009 New Lenox, IL 60451-1766
Cedar Rapids, IA 52404 815.462.9324
319.841.4000 FAX 815.462.9328
FAX 319.841.4012
800.728.7805

Chicago, IL Sioux City, IA


225 W. Washington Street 519 Nebraska Street
22nd Floor P.O. Box 3556
Chicago, IL 60606 Sioux City, IA 51102
312.775.1002 712.258.4487
FAX 312.924.0201 FAX 712.255.0697

Des Moines, IA St. Louis, MO


5525 Merle Hay Road, 16020 Swingley Ridge Road
Suite 200 Suite 120
Johnston, IA 50131 St. Louis, MO 63017
515.278.2913 636.519.0990
FAX 515.278.1846 FAX 636.519.0996
800.593.2339 888.368.4389

Houston, TX Sioux Falls, SD


11000 Richmond Avenue 6010 South Minnesota Avenue
Suite 300 Suite 102
Houston, TX 77042 Sioux Falls, SD 57108-2715
713.965.9996 605.334.4499
FAX 713.965.0044 FAX 605.338.6124
800.765.3008

McHenry, IL St. Paul, MN


420 N. Front Street Court International Building
Suite 100 2550 University Avenue West
McHenry, IL 60050-5528 Suite 400N
815.385.1778 St. Paul, MN 55114
FAX 815.385.1781 651.644.4389
FAX 651.278.1846
800.765.2008

Moline, IL Yorkville, IL
1515 5th Avenue 651 Prairie Pointe
Heritage Place, Suite 102 Suite 201
Moline, IL 61265 Yorkville, IL 60560-6506
309.764.1220 630.553.7560
FAX 309.764.1921 FAX 630.553.7646
800.214.2731

www.hrgreen.com

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi