Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Linn County West (LCW) is the adaptive re-use of a building constructed in 1978-79 as a
Montgomery Wards department store, one of four original anchor stores for Westdale Mall
shopping center. The LCW building contains just under 120,000 gross square feet of space
divided between two levels. Almost 75,000 square feet are located on the lower level and almost
45,000 square feet including the mechanical penthouse and the unheated “Outdoor Sales Area”
are on the upper level. Both levels are directly accessible from surface parking lots and both
Linn County leased the space to provide emergency housing for a number of its departments
displaced by the 2008 flood. Linn County would now like to consider the feasibility of converting
the former Montgomery Wards store into permanent County administrative offices.
page 1 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
In an attempt to make the findings of this feasibility study comparable with other options that the
County is considering, the renovation of Linn County West has the following goals:
1. Provide permanent office space for the departments currently located at Linn County West
2. Provide permanent office space for as yet unidentified departments, agencies or tenants
with a similar use of space as those departments being relocated to other facilities from
3. Bring Linn County West into conformance with current building and energy Codes.
4. Provide finishes consistent with proposed renovation of the Linn County Administrative
5. The offices located at Linn County West are to remain open and accessible to the public
throughout construction.
6. The renovated Linn County West will qualify for LEED Silver certification.
page 2 of 55
Executive Summary
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
Executive Summary
Renovation Goals
1. Provide permanent office space for the departments currently located at Linn County West
2. Provide permanent office space for as yet unidentified departments, agencies or tenants
with a similar use of space as those departments being relocated to other facilities from
3. Bring Linn County West into conformance with current building and energy Codes.
4. Provide finishes consistent with proposed renovation of the Linn County Administrative
5. The offices located at Linn County West are to remain open and accessible to the public
throughout construction.
6. The renovated Linn County West will qualify for LEED Silver certification.
page 3 of 55
Space Needs
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
Space Needs
The current configuration of spaces in the Linn County West building includes a number of
agencies or departments already scheduled to be relocated to other facilities. The specific space
requirements for these agencies are not included as part of this study, but the square footage they
• General Assistance
• Juvenile Probation
• LCCS Financial
• MHDD / CPC
• Veterans Affairs
Most of these agencies are located on the second floor of the LCW building and occupy all of that
level except the Loading Dock and Purchasing/Mail Room. Family, Traffic and Juvenile Court, the
Clerk of Courts for Juvenile & Traffic and the Juvenile Probation office occupy a large area on the
page 4 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
The Board of Supervisors has considered other departments currently housed at the LCW
building for relocation to the Administration Office Building (AOB). These other departments
would remain at Linn County West if renovation of this facility into permanent county offices is
judged to be more feasible than other options. Table 1 lists the agencies that would remain at
LCW, the square footage they currently occupy, the space that has been assigned for them at the
AOB, and the space that has been budgeted to them in the LCW for this study. The larger square
footages occupied by each department in the current configuration is assumed to be the result of
inefficiencies in the layout driven by the need to locate the offices in the LCW quickly and with
minimum remodeling. The AOB space assignments result from a more careful consideration of
departmental needs and more accurately reflect the true space requirements for each
department. The program spaces used for this study are based on the space assignments
page 5 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
page 6 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
The total area of program spaces identified in Table 1 is considerably less than the available
space in the building. For the purposes of calculating air conditioning requirements and energy
demands for this study, it will be assumed that the County would fill the available space in the
Conference rooms are necessary to conduct routine business in most offices. Because they are
typically not used continuously, conference rooms offer an opportunity to share a resource among
departments. Strategic location of the conference rooms allows individual departments to take
ownership of smaller conference rooms, controlling that room’s scheduling for their convenience,
while facilitating the use of that same room by other departments when needed. Larger
conference rooms should be considered community property and should be located so that they
are not likely to become the property of any one department. Instead they should be located for
page 7 of 55
Existing Conditions
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
Available Space
The Lynn County West building includes 74,820 gross square feet on the lower level. The upper
level includes 36,444 gross square feet plus 4,616 gross square feet in what had previously
The “Outdoor Sales Area” is protected by its roof, a wall it shares with the main building on the
north and another wall that separates it from some mechanical spaces on the east. The south
and west sides are open to the weather, enclosed only by columns supporting the roof with steel
gates between. Since the closing of the Wards store, painted plywood attached to the interior
side of the steel gates has sealed the space from public view and to reduce the need for
maintenance in the area. Although not originally intended as part of the building’s interior space,
it would not be difficult to renovate this area into interior space. However, for the purposes of
this study, when energy costs and life cycle costs are calculated, the “Outdoor Sales Area” will
The following table summarizes the available space at Linn County West:
Upper Level
44,724 g.s.f.
page 8 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
The land associated with Linn County West covers an area of just under nine acres and
includes driveways and paved parking areas on the north, east and south sides of the building.
Surface parking is provided for 553 vehicles. The parking areas and driveways are paved with
asphalt originally installed in 1980. The condition of the asphalt is poor. Stormwater
Most of the site beyond the footprint of the Linn County West building is paved for walks, drives
and parking. Most of that pavement is in poor condition and has been allowed to deteriorate to
the point that it should be replaced. Vegetated areas are limited to a narrow strips between the
building and the perimeter sidewalk, to a steep side slope separating the south parking area
from the east parking area, to a small and narrow side slope separating the east parking area
from an entrance drive, and one small, triangular island marking the north side of an access
The Linn County West building is a free-standing, two-story, steel-framed structure independent
of the structure of Westdale Mall. Elements of the existing steel frame appear to be in good
condition as does the elevated floor slab. The joint separating the two structures is bridged by
cap flashing and sealants on the exterior, and by joint covers on the interior. If the mall building
were to be razed, wall materials would be exposed to view and to the weather that were not
intended to be exposed. The Linn County West building would remain essentially complete, but
new cladding would be needed in these areas to protect and conceal the newly exposed wall
materials.
page 9 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
A building envelope is the assembly of materials that shelter the building’s interior spaces from
the outdoor environment: the roof, the walls with doors and windows, the foundation and the
floor slab at grade. The visual characteristics of the building envelope provide cues to a
building’s style and appeal. The performance characteristics of the building envelope play a
large role in determining a building’s energy efficiency and the comfort of its inhabitants.
The existing building envelope at Lynn County West is in need of extensive maintenance work.
Water infiltration to occupied spaces following recent rains indicates that the building envelope
may be failing at a number of points. The building is poorly insulated by today’s standards. The
masonry exhibits extensive damage attributable to water infiltration and thermal movement.
page 10 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
The original roof design was a built-up bituminous membrane laid over 2 1/4” of rigid insulation
on a structurally sloped roof deck. The existing roofing system is a fully-adhered TPO
membrane over insulation on most of the building area. Two areas of roofing flanking the
mechanical penthouse have a ballasted TPO membrane. No roofing cores were taken at the
time observations were made for this study to determine the type or thickness of insulation in
the current roofing assembly. A warranty placard on display at the roof access indicates that
the TPO roofing system was under warranty until August 7, 2002. The system is now seven
years beyond its warranty date. Observations on the roof of fresh sealant applied at membrane
flashing keeper bars, of newer membrane patches and of ballast raked back to expose
membrane seams suggest an on-going battle against leaks. The roof exhibits numerous repairs
and is old enough that total replacement as part of the renovation makes the most sense.
page 11 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
The exterior masonry is a veneer of dark-colored, king-size, fired-clay brick units set in a 1/3
running bond. Typically, the masonry has an 8” steel stud frame back-up, but in specific areas,
such as at stair towers or at elevator shafts, the masonry has a concrete block back-up. There is
3 ½ “batt insulation with a vapor barrier facing the building’s interior between the studs where
the back-up is steel stud framing. Only ¾” thick rigid insulation is indicated for locations having
block back-up.
Typical for masonry veneer wall construction in the late 1970’s, the wall is treated as a barrier
with little or no provision made to manage water that may infiltrate the wall system. There is no
space between the brick veneer and its back-up to channel water away from the building’s
interior. There is no damp-proofing or building wrap indicated between the brick and the back-up
sheathing. No through-wall flashings are indicated in the plans for the foundation-masonry
interface or for other key locations, and no evidence of through-wall flashings was observed on
site. Relief joints in the masonry require new sealants. The existing sealants at relief joints have
cracked and pulled away from the masonry, providing little or no protection against water
infiltration.
page 12 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
There are no windows penetrating the masonry envelope. The only windows to the exterior in
the Linn County West building are side lights at the entrance vestibules and some skylights over
the escalators. The absence of natural light in the building’s interior may have been suitable for
Parapets are those portions of the wall rising above a building’s roof line. The Linn County West
building features fairly tall parapets made to look like a seamless continuation of the wall below.
The framing for the parapets is typically a balloon-framed extension of the lower wall’s back-up
framing. The roof side of most parapets is clad with painted, corrugated steel panels over a
double layer of gypsum board sheathing. The paint on the steel panels is heavily oxidized and
the panels exhibit rust in many places. The wall that is common with mall is faced with fired clay
brick set in a 1/3 running bond backed with concrete masonry units. Metal cap flashings at
The Linn County West building also features five porches at the public entrances. The porches
feature masonry columns supporting massive masonry volumes designed to break down the
building’s scale and provide visual interest. The masonry volumes provide no usable space
within the building. The porches also feature banks of skylights over key entrances. The
masonry at the porches is in poor condition. There is evidence of water leaking into the wall
system from the skylights and of thermal stress on the brick units.
page 13 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
The original construction drawings show that the concrete foundations were to be protected
from water infiltration by the application of a 20 mil neoprene membrane extending from grade
to the footing, and with a flashing of the same neoprene material across the top of the footing
adding protection to the joint between the footing and the foundation wall. Four-inch diameter
footing drains to intercept ground water were to be installed at the base of the south foundation
wall and along the south end of the east foundation wall where the earth is graded up to the
building’s upper floor level. No clean-outs were observed for this footing drain and no outlet for
this drain was observed. No determination of silting within the drain could be made. Whether or
not the footing drain is functioning at all was not determined. County employees have installed a
new sump and pump along the building’s east wall outside of the freight elevator shaft. The new
page 14 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
The original construction drawings indicate that 1” thick rigid insulation was to be applied to the
top four feet on the exterior side of foundations walls that were not exposed. Where the upper
parts of foundation walls were exposed, such as at the loading docks, the insulation was to be
applied to the first four feet below grade. The existence or condition of this insulation has not
been confirmed.
The original construction documents show the floor on the ground level of the building
constructed as a 4” concrete slab over a 6 mil membrane on a sand bed at least 4” thick. A
water stop was to have been cast into the joint between the floor slab and the foundation wall.
page 15 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
Linn County West inherited a 277/480 volt, 3,000 amp electrical service when it took possession
of the former Montgomery Wards store. The main switchboard is fed from a pad-mounted
transformer owned by Alliant Energy. The main switchboard feeds several 277/480 volt
distribution panels throughout the facility as well as a motor control center located in the
mechanical penthouse. At each 277/480 volt distribution panel location there is a transformer
and 120/208 volt panelboard. The original design drawing indicates that the large feeders used
aluminum conductors.
Generally, the electrical distribution system is functional; however, it is nearing the end of its
service life. Since the facility was designed as a department store, the major electrical loads
were cooling, heating and lighting with little 120/208 volt distribution. At least two of the
underground feeder conduits were conveying ground water into the distribution panels.
page 16 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
transfer switch feeding an emergency panel. The engine-generator is original to the building. It
was not functional at the time of inspection, but was in the process of being repaired. The
engine generator is at the end of its service life and does not meet Linn County’s requirements
Lighting systems in the building date to the original construction. Open areas are lit with 6-lamp
fluorescent fixtures with egg-crate grills. Storage areas are lit with continuous rows of open
lamp fluorescent T12 strip fixtures. Lighting control is through lighting contactors distributed
page 17 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
The existing lighting systems exceed current energy code power density limits. The light fixture
distribution points located throughout the facility. All current telecommunication facilities were
installed by the County. All telecommunications facilities will require replacement or relocation to
The existing fire alarm system is an addressable Notifier system with audible and visual
annunciation throughout the building and with smoke detection in select areas. The system
does not meet the County’s requirement to combine the fire alarm with a mass communication
page 18 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
Cooling
The building is cooled by three water cooled reciprocating chillers and a cooling tower located
on the roof outside the mechanical penthouse. The mechanical penthouse also contains two
custom built air handling units. Each unit contains a large array of pleated filters, direct
expansion cooling coils and a belt driven fan with inlet vanes for air volume control. HR Green
was unable to determine whether the inlet guide vanes still operated or what controls the
position of the vanes. Conditioned air is delivered to spaces via ductwork containing variable air
volume boxes that modulate in response to space temperatures. Air is returned to the unit
through a return air plenum above the ceiling on both floors. The mechanical penthouse
contains two large outside air louvers and two large relief air louvers each with roll-up doors on
the exterior side. Outside air and return air are mixed in the space outside the air handling unit
rooms. Currently, both relief air louvers are blocked causing relief air to exit by exfiltration
through mall entrances. One outside air louver has been blocked and the other has been
reduced in size resulting in an unknown amount of outside air entering the building.
page 19 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
The cooling system dates from original construction with very few modifications since that time.
The system was reported to be functional but all the equipment has exceeded its useful life.
The cooling tower shows signs of organic deposits on the interior of the unit which reduces the
efficiency of the unit. The chillers are less efficient than currently available cooling systems and
also contain the refrigerant R-22 which is being phased out of production in 2010. The existing
ductwork is sized and arranged to accommodate an open floor plan department store. The
ductwork is not sized correctly nor will the ductwork layout be sufficient when the space is
converted to an office type environment. In addition, due to its age, the ductwork is assumed to
have air leaks which result in higher energy costs. The entire cooling system including
The computer/communications room is cooled year-round by a split system air conditioning unit
installed as part of the temporary renovation required for the county to occupy the building. The
space is served by a single unit and no backup system is present if the primary system fails.
Heating
The building is heated by a separate ductwork system. Electric resistance furnaces are located
above the ceiling and scattered throughout the building. The furnaces use air from the return
plenum above the ceiling and supply warm air through diffusers identical in appearance to the
cooling system diffusers. Smaller spaces created by the temporary remodel are likely to have
only one supply of air (hot or cold). Heat in entrances and auxiliary spaces is provided by
electric unit heaters and electric radiant heaters. Electric baseboards are used to handle the
skin loads in rooms with exterior walls. The two air handling units are reported to still operate
during the winter months to provide ventilation air to the building. The ventilation air is not
page 20 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
conditioned during the winter and a high return air to outside air ratio must be relied upon to
The use of electric resistance heating throughout the building leads to high electrical
consumption and demand charges during the winter months. In addition, the entire heating
system dates from original construction making the equipment approximately 31 years old. The
equipment has exceeded its useful life and is an inefficient way to heat the building. The entire
Controls
The building is currently controlled by a pneumatic control system dating from the original
construction. The control system is reported to be working but the level of actual control over
the system is unknown. Due to the age of the system, it is very likely that the control has
diminished since original installation and that portions of the system may not function. In
addition, current Linn County building standards utilize direct digital control systems. The
page 21 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
Fire Protection
The existing fire protection system was installed to meet the requirements of an open floor plan
department store. Conversion of the space to an office layout will change the sprinkler
requirements. In order to adequately protect the new layout, the existing sprinkler will need to
page 22 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
Plumbing
The building contains plumbing from original construction along with new plumbing that was
added to meet the needs of the temporary reconstruction. Locations of restrooms and quantity
of fixtures will be modified if the space is remodeled resulting in the need to remove all existing
plumbing. The existing fixtures do not meet the water efficiency requirements of the Energy
Policy Act (Epact) of 1992 or the LEED rating system and they will need to be replaced with
page 23 of 55
Project Constraints
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
Applicable Codes
As a County-owned facility, Linn County West is subject to applicable Linn County’ Codes:
• International Building Code (IBC), 2006 Edition as amended by the Linn County Board
of Supervisors;
• International Fire Code (IFC), 2006 Edition as amended by the Linn County Board of
Supervisors;
• Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC), 2003 Edition as amended by the Linn County Board of
Supervisors;
• ICC Electrical Code, 2006 Edition as amended by the Linn County Board of
Supervisors;
o International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC), 2006 Edition as amended by the Linn
The Cedar Rapids Zoning Ordinance applies to parking requirements. (Section 32.05.020
Required – See Table 32.05-4:Minimum Off-Street Parking Requirements for Office; business,
professional, or governmental not listed separately: 4 per 1,000 s.f. Gross Floor Area.) With a
gross floor area of 119,544 square feet, Linn County West is required to provide 479 off-street
parking spaces.
page 24 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
The real estate associated with Linn County West is encumbered with a series of easements
and agreements that integrate the use of the building and land associated with Westdale Mall
with the building and parking areas belonging to Linn County West. These provisions grant each
party easements into, over and across each other’s land and define how the maintenance and
operation of common areas will be managed and paid for. Succession and assignment clauses
cause the easements and agreements to run with the land and to survive changes in ownership
• The right to eject persons not authorized to use the common area;
Key agreements address common area development and maintenance and include:
common areas;
• Restrict designated employee parking to spaces at least 250 feet from the enclosed
mall;
• Process for withdrawing a tract from the maintenance and operation provisions of the
page 25 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
• Required parking ratio (5.3 automobile parking spaces for each 1,000 gross square feet
of floor area = (119,544 g.s.f. / 1,000 g.s.f) x 5.3 = 634 automobile parking spaces.);
• Maximum development of floor area for Linn County West limited to 126,000 square
feet;
• Signage characteristics;
Some costs to Linn County West associated with the Common Area Maintenance (CAM)
provisions are known. For the purposes of this study, the CAM assessments will be assigned
the value of $50,000 annually. Other costs, such as the dues for membership in the Merchants
Association are unknown and not factored into the operating costs addressed in this study.
If Linn County were to pursue making the former Wards store into permanent County offices, it
may want to open negotiations with the Mall operator over issues such as membership in the
Merchants Association and its share of CAM fees. The CAM fees are structured on the
assumption that every property or tenant associated with the mall benefits equally per square
foot from the amenities of the enclosed mall. This may have been true when all of the occupants
were retail businesses that depended for their revenues on the traffic these amenities
generated. The County enjoys no such benefit, and in fact may help to generate traffic to the
page 26 of 55
LEED
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
Linn County has set a goal for the renovation of Linn County West to be certified with a LEED
Silver rating. The LEED® (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Green Building
Rating System is a voluntary, third-party certification process that evaluates projects using a
consensus-based rating system for the design, construction and operation of high-performance
green buildings. “LEED 2009 for New Construction and Major Renovations”, recently published
by the U.S. Green Building Council, provides the criteria used by this study.
rating system to achieve LEED Silver certification. Key areas evaluated in the certification
The Linn County West renovation project offers many opportunities to make improvements in
each of these areas. A preliminary tabulation of the potential LEED points this project could
earn indicates that the Linn County West renovation can achieve LEED Silver certification with
page 27 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
The site scores very well in the categories of good community connectivity and access to public
transportation with no effort. Linn County West can earn five points for its location alone: It is
averaging ten housing units per acre. It is within ½ mile of at least ten basic services and has
pedestrian access between Linn County West and those basic services. Another six points is
earned because two Cedar Rapids Transit bus routes, Route #10 and Route #12, run to
Westdale Mall and have stops within ¼ mile walking distance from the front entrance of Linn
County West.
The project can earn an additional LEED point by providing bicycle storage for at least 5% of all
of the building users in conjunction with providing shower and changing facilities for ½% of the
building’s full-time equivalent employees. Another three LEED points can be earned by
reserving 5% of the parking spaces for low-emitting and fuel efficient vehicles and locating those
reserved spaces closest to building entrances. (Spaces reserved for handicapped persons will
always have precedence in being located close to building entrances over other kinds of
reserved parking.)
Choices made regarding the design of the proposed roof replacement and re-pavement of the
parking areas can result in a reduction of the heat island effect and possibly earn another two
LEED points. Choosing parking lot lighting fixtures that direct light downward and do not bleed
light off of the property will earn another point for Light Pollution Reduction.
page 28 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
Additional work could be done to reduce the rate of stormwater run-off from Linn County West,
and to improve the quality of stormwater discharged from the site. However, these
improvements would have a large impact on the project cost and only earn a maximum of two
LEED points, so they have not been included among the strategies being pursued in this study.
Water Efficiency
Water use reduction by 20% is a prerequisite of the LEED certification. This study anticipates
reducing water use at Linn County West by 30% to earn two LEED points. All of the existing
plumbing fixtures, which are thirty years old, are proposed to be replaced with new, water-
The local plumbing Code does not permit the use of gray water for flushing toilets. Further
reductions in water use can be achieved, however, by selecting plant materials for landscape
areas that require little or no irrigation and by using only collected rainwater for the irrigation that
does occur. The project could earn an additional four LEED points for eliminating the need for
page 29 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
to perform as intended. The renovated building’s energy performance must be 5% better than
the renovated building’s calculated baseline performance rating. The renovated building’s HVAC
Most of the LEED points to be gained under the category of Energy Efficiency will be found in
the pursuit of strategies that improve a building’s energy performance beyond the standard of
systems, the use of high efficiency lighting fixtures, and the use of occupancy sensor controls
for lighting and ventilation. This study anticipates earning seven LEED points for optimizing Linn
Other strategies proposed for earning LEED credits under the category of Energy & Atmosphere
for Linn County West include Enhanced Commissioning, Enhanced Refrigeration Management
directly to the Owner early in the design process to lead, review and oversee the completion of
all commissioning process activities. The Commissioning Authority participates through the
services. Ten months after substantial completion the Commissioning Authority reviews
page 30 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
equipment that minimizes the use of ozone-depleting refrigerants and the implementation of an
requires the development and implementation of a plan to meter equipment and track energy
use against the predicted performance of the design. This study anticipates earning six more
The category of Materials and Resources awards LEED points for the recycling and re-use of
used materials, the incorporation of recycled materials into new work, the re-use of existing
buildings, minimizing the distance materials need to be transported and for the selection of
renewable products. It is the realization of the concept to “reduce, reuse, recycle” at the heart of
the green movement. The Linn County West Renovation project will pursue points under the
and demolition debris. A construction waste management plan would be implemented to identify
materials that are to be diverted from the waste stream. For the Linn County West project
materials that could be diverted from the waste stream include: light gauge steel framing
members, hollow metal doors and frames, gypsum board, glass, aluminum storefront framing,
copper piping and cables, steel ceiling suspension grid, fired-clay brick, Portland concrete and
asphaltic concrete. It is assumed that these materials will easily constitute over 55% of the total
waste by weight generated for this project. Implementation of construction waste management
page 31 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
Regional Materials awards points for the incorporation of materials that are extracted and
manufactured within 500 miles of the project to minimize the impact of transporting materials. It
is assumed that at least 10% of the materials incorporated into the Linn County West
renovation, based on cost, will be from sources within that 500 mile radius earning one more
LEED point.
This study is not assuming that the Linn County West project will earn the any of the three
LEED points available for the re-use of an existing building. At least 55% of the original
building’s structure and envelope must be re-used to qualify for the first point. The Linn County
West renovation project may not meet this threshold because this study assumes that all of the
existing masonry veneer will be replaced to enhance the building’s thermal performance and
The Indoor Environmental Quality credits support project choices that enhance the health and
well-being of building occupants through the reduction of indoor air pollutants, good ventilation,
reduction of indoor contaminants and provision of the means to isolate and filter those
contaminants that are present, the introduction of natural daylight into occupied spaces and
This study focuses on those sub-categories addressing indoor air quality, control of lighting
systems by occupants and thermal comfort for strategies to earn LEED points. The HVAC
system for the Linn County West renovation is assumed to include a building automation system
page 32 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
that monitors air flow and carbon dioxide levels, and issues a warning when measurements vary
by more than 10%. Monitoring outdoor air delivery in this way earns one LEED point.
Implementing an indoor air quality plan during construction is important because the facility will
be occupied throughout construction, and it will earn the project one more LEED point.
Specifying low-emitting adhesives and sealants, paints and coatings, and carpet systems
reduces the contamination of indoor air with volatile organic compounds (VOC) and earns
Providing control of lighting to individual occupants or groups of occupants allows them to tailor
their light usage to their particular needs and earls one more LEED point for the project.
Providing occupant control for thermal comfort may be achieved through multiple strategies
including the use of individual thermostat controls, operable windows, manual diffuser dampers
and control of individual radiant panels. Enabling a minimum of 50% of the building’s occupants
to make adjustments to meet their individual needs and preferences will earn Linn County West
page 33 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
Occupancy, earning one LEED point. The HVAC system would include a permanent monitoring
system to measure and track the building’s performance against design comfort criteria to
proposed to occur six to eighteen months after occupancy to assess overall occupant
satisfaction with the thermal performance of the building or to identify thermal comfort-related
problems. These verification efforts will earn Linn County West one additional LEED point.
This study assumes that daylighting will be greatly enhanced at Linn County West by the
introduction of many windows and some skylights to a building that has virtually none now.
However, the geometry of the building makes it very difficult to meet the threshold to earn
additional LEED points for daylighting and views. This study does not assume any LEED points
Innovation in Design
The Innovation in Design category provides one LEED point that should be a given on any project
seeking LEED certification: one LEED point for having a LEED accredited professional on the
design team. There are additional points that can be earned under this category for innovative
design. This study assumes that the point for including a LEED accredited professional is earned,
but does not assume any innovative design credits are earned.
page 34 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
Regional Priority
Regional Priority credits can are bonus points awarded in addition to the base 100 points available.
Up to four Regional Priority credits can be earned by obtaining the LEED credits for categories that
have been identified by the USGBC regional council as having special environmental importance
for that region. The following categories have been designated as regional priorities in the area of
• Sustainable Sites Credit 4.2: Alternate Transportation – Bicycle Storage and Changing Rooms
This study has already indicated anticipation that Linn County West will earn the available points for
four of the identified regional priorities: Development Density and Community Connectivity, for
Storage and Changing Rooms and for Construction Waste Management. Linn County West should,
therefore, qualify for the associated LEED points for Regional Priority.
It has been determined that a LEED Silver Rating is very achievable for the Linn County West
project. If the County chose to pursue all of the credits identified in this study as having a
moderate impact on the design for Linn County West, a total of 79 points could be earned for a
page 35 of 55
Renovation Scope
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
Renovation Scope
The scope of construction work required to achieve the goals of this renovation is assumed as
follows:
Site Work
This study assumes that all of the parking area and drives paved with asphalt will be repaved as
part of the Linn County West renovation. Two different strategies for replacing the pavement
were given consideration. The first strategy is the most basic: simply repave those areas
currently paved with asphalt with new asphalt. The second strategy considered the potential for
improving the site’s stormwater retention by replacing 20% of the traditional asphalt paving with
a permeable pavement system. The construction cost for pursuing the second strategy was
42% greater than repaving with traditional asphalt. The goal of earning LEED Silver certification
for this project can be accomplished without incurring the cost of installing the permeable
pavement. For this study it is assumed that permeable pavement is not used.
Some additional green space will be obtained by the elimination of part of the truck well outside
of the loading docks on the south side of the building’s upper floor. The truck loading dock built
to support shipments to the Montgomery Wards department store is greatly oversized for the
operation of a county office building. Of the six existing loading bays, one is dedicated for refuse
collection and five are set up for loading and unloading semi trucks. At least three of the bays
will be converted to other uses and about 1,700 square feet of pavement front of them will be
page 36 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
Building Demolition
Demolition of the existing finishes, partitions, fixtures and equipment will be extensive. This
study assumes that the roofing will be torn-off down to the metal roof deck. The exterior wythe
of masonry will be removed, but the steel back-up framing will be retained. The existing
entrance porches and their structure would also be removed. All interior partition framing and
gypsum board, finishes, plumbing, lights and equipment would be removed. The escalators
would be removed. The existing passenger elevator would also be removed. The existing fire
sprinkler system would be removed. And finally, the existing HVAC system and all of its
Building Construction
The building envelope will require a great deal of work. A new built-up roofing system will be
installed with insulation to raise the roof’s R-value to 30. A “green” roofing system was
considered, but discarded for this study. The existing roof structure would need to be enhanced
to support the loads for a traditional “green” roof, and the LEED points available for this work
page 37 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
Insulation for the exterior walls will also be enhanced raising their R-value to 24. The exterior
walls would be reconstructed to manage water infiltration. Masonry walls would be constructed
as rain-screen cavity walls with a 1 ½” to 2” air space immediately behind the brick to intercept
water that penetrates the system and then channel it to flashings that redirect the water back to
the outside of the wall. A continuous 2” layer of rigid insulation board and a weather barrier are
located over the sheathing on the inboard side of the cavity to minimize thermal bridging at the
studs. Fiberglass batt insulation would be installed in the spaces between the existing 8” deep
steel studs. The wall would be finished with a continuous vapor barrier covered with 5/8”
The added insulation and air space required for the masonry rain-screen cavity walls requires
an additional 4” wall thickness. Because we are re-using the steel stud back-up framing in
place, that entire additional width is toward the outside of the wall. Where masonry rain-screen
walls are to be constructed for this project, therefore, foundations will need to be made 4”
Not all of the existing masonry would be replaced with new masonry rain-screen cavity walls.
Introducing day lighting and views to the renovated building is part of the strategy for achieving
LEED Silver certification. Up to 40% of a wall can be opened as windows and still meet the
requirements of the Energy Code. Curtain wall rain-screen will be used in lieu of masonry in
some areas. Curtain wall provides the opportunity to introduce light and views, to manage water
infiltration and to enhance thermal performance without the need to make the foundation any
thicker.
page 38 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
The number of entrances would be reduced. The existing building has four large entrances on
the lower level, two facing north and two facing east, plus one large entrance to the upper level
from the south. This study assumes that there will be only two entrances on the lower level, one
from the north and one from the east, and one to the second level from the south. Each exterior
entrance will feature two pairs of glass doors in a glass and thermally broken aluminum
storefront fame with a second set of two pairs of glass doors in a glass and storefront frame to
create a vestibule.
The number of sanitary plumbing fixtures will be increased and public restrooms will be
relocated for more convenient access. Most of the restroom fixtures are currently located on the
lower level near the center of the south wall. Three single-user restrooms are currently located
on the upper level near the west end of the south wall. With all of the restrooms combined, the
existing fixture count does not satisfy the requirements of the Uniform Plumbing Code for Linn
County West’s occupant load. For the purposes of this study it is assumed that the renovation
will provide one public restroom for each sex centrally located on each level, one public family
page 39 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
restroom on each level located near the public restrooms, a staff restroom with a single shower
for each sex to be located near an employee lunch room and a private, unisex restroom located
near the Supervisors’ Board Room. A janitor’s closet with mop sink would be located on each
floor. Four pairs of drinking fountains would be located along corridors. Relocating plumbing
fixtures will entail cutting openings in the floor slab for installation of the new drains.
elevator. He had looked for one, but couldn’t find it. For the renovation, we are proposing that
the escalators be replaced with a new, centrally located elevator, and that the two levels of Linn
County West should be connected with a new, centrally located open stairway.
page 40 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
designed for a 2% max voltage drop. Surge protective devices (SPDs) will be provided
on the main switchboard and all 120/208 volt branch panels. A dedicated transformer
and branch panel will be provided for the main telecommunication room in accordance
Emergency Power
The emergency power system will be capable of supplying power to the entire facility. A
24 hour base mounted fuel tank. A closed-transition transfer switch will allow power to
page 41 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
be switched from source to source without interruption of power, allowing the facility to
Lighting
lighting system will utilize high-performance T8 lamp and ballast combination and LED
task lighting.
page 42 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
schedules will control the lighting system. Architectural lighting will be installed at select
public areas.
Exterior lighting will be designed to exceed energy code requirements. All exterior lights
Telecommunications Infrastructure
The telecommunications infrastructure will be in accordance with EIA/TIA 568 and 569.
required to meet EIA/TIA 568. Telecommunications shall be complete from the outlet to
An Access Control System (ACS) using the County’s approved vendor will be installed.
The ACS will utilize proximity card readers to control exterior doors and select interior
television system will be interfaced with the access control system to record activity at
select controlled doors. Additional cameras will monitor public areas and public
page 43 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
HVAC System
The new heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system will consist of variable air
volume built up air handling units. The units will contain full energy recovery wheels that will
transfer thermal energy from the exhaust air stream to the outside air stream. The full energy
recovery wheels will decrease the energy costs associated with bringing outside air into the
building and will help the building obtain LEED silver certification. In addition, the units will have
full economizer capability in order to use cool, dry outside air for cooling when outside air
temperatures are suitable. This feature also helps to reduce the energy usage of the building
and contributes toward LEED silver certification. The fans on the air handling units will have
variable frequency drives that will vary the fan speed in response to building heating and cooling
demands. Variable air volume boxes with and without hot water re-heat coils will be located
The units will be equipped with outside air dampers to provide the amount of outside air
required by ASHRAE standard 62.1 in order to maintain acceptable indoor air quality for the
building. The units will use an energy saving feature called demand controlled ventilation to
page 44 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
determine the required amount of outside air during different levels of occupancy. The outside
damper will modulate to allow more or less outside air depending on the concentration of carbon
dioxide in the return air stream. This feature reduces energy consumption by delivering only the
exceed current energy code requirements for full-load and Centrifugal Chiller
part-load energy efficiency and will reduce the electrical usage of the building. The chillers also
use the environmentally friendly refrigerant R-134a which does not deplete the ozone and is not
The building will be heated with gas-fired condensing hot water boilers. The boilers will provide
hot water to pre-heat coils located in the air handling units and re-heat coils located in variable
air volume boxes to allow for individual temperature control. Condensing boilers have
combustion efficiencies near 98 percent and will reduce the cost to heat the building.
Condensing boilers far exceed the energy code required efficiency for boilers and will contribute
page 45 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
room air conditioning unit designed to operate year round. Each room will also have a variable
air volume box to provide backup cooling in the event that the computer room air conditioner
fails.
A ground source geothermal heat pump system was also evaluated for the Linn County West
Building. The current parking lot is in disrepair and will need to be replaced creating the
opportunity to install the borefield underneath the parking lot. A ground source geothermal
system has the potential to provide energy savings in addition to those provided by the system
described above. For purposes of this study, the built up air handling unit system with water
cooled chillers was used in order to maintain consistency with the proposed design for the
Administrative Office Building. The Weidt Group has been hired by MidAmerican Energy and
Alliant Energy to review the feasibility of installing a ground source geothermal system at the
Administrative Office Building and to investigate what potential rebates would be available from
the utilities.
Controls
The HVAC controls system will be a complete direct digital control system. The system will
control all of the HVAC equipment and to provide a central point of control for the building. The
control system will also reduce energy consumption by allowing for scheduling of occupied and
page 46 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
Plumbing System
building will also feature a rainwater collection system that will collect
rainwater from the roof of the building and store for landscape irrigation.
The reduction of water usage by these strategies will help achieve the
Dual Flush Flushometer
LEED silver rating for the building.
Hot water for lavatories will be provided by instantaneous tankless water heaters located
underneath the lavatories. Tankless water heaters reduce the energy usage for hot water and
will help the facility to achieve the LEED silver certification. The restroom containing the shower
facilities will require an electric tank-type hot water heat to provide sufficient hot water to the
showers. Using this combination of point-of-use hot water heaters eliminates the cost of
installing hot water piping throughout the facility and eliminates the energy consumption of a hot
Fire Protection
A new sprinkler system will be installed to meet the light-hazard occupancy classification of the
office areas and will be appropriately design to protect storage areas. The new system will be
page 47 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
Because the building will be occupied and open to the public throughout the renovation, the
demolition and subsequent construction will need to occur in a piecemeal fashion. It is assumed
that all of the departments scheduled to be relocated to alternate facilities have completed that
move before demolition begins, which leaves the upper level vacant except for Purchasing and
the Mail Room. The area on the lower floor currently occupied by the Courts, the Clerk of Court
and Juvenile Probation will also be vacated. Having these large areas vacated prior to
construction will facilitate the process by allowing the renovation to be completed in one area
before a department is relocated to its new permanent office space, opening the next area for
construction.
There are costs associated with staging a renovation project in this fashion. Construction
moves slower, so the fixed monthly costs to the contractor, collectively known as general
conditions costs, are greater. Although precautions are taken, there is greater risk that an
employee of the county or a member of the public could be injured as the result of construction
activity, so insurance premiums are a little higher. There is no easy way to demolish the heating,
ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC) system and install a new one without affecting the
offices served. This study anticipates the contractor renting and installing, and eventually
removing, a temporary HVAC system to condition occupied spaces during the transition from
page 48 of 55
Opinion of Cost
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
Howard R. Green Company has prepared a preliminary opinion of construction cost for the
renovation of Linn County West into permanent County offices. Assumptions underlying our
opinion of the cost of the work are discussed in the sections of this study titled “Renovation
Scope” and “Sequence of Work”. Table 3 provides a detail summary of the opinion of
construction cost.
page 49 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
page 50 of 55
Annual Energy Costs
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
The energy costs for operating a building are estimated using the actual rates charged by
utilities applied to a building model that simulates the consumption of electricity and gas to heat,
cool, ventilate, light and operate incidental equipment in the building. For budgeting and
HR Green utilized the Carrier E20-II load calculation and simulation program to estimate energy
usage and costs for the Linn County West building over a period of one year. The building
model incorporated the proposed new mechanical and electrical systems discussed in this
report and also included all proposed architectural changes. The following assumptions were
• Only office equipment plug loads were included in the analysis. Office equipment plug
loads included computers, monitors, printer & copiers. Computers and monitors were
• Space usage and occupancy levels are similar to the current layout at Linn County West.
Offices were assumed to be occupied from approximately 8am to 5pm, Monday through
Friday and conference rooms were assumed to be occupied sporadically throughout the
day.
• Entrance snow melting energy usage was not included in the analysis.
• Exterior lighting and elevator electrical usage were not included in the analysis.
• Building temperatures set points of 74/80 were used for occupied/unoccupied periods
page 51 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
• Electric rates used were for Large General Service from Interstate Power and Light
• Historical weather data for Cedar Rapids was input to simulate average weather
Using these assumptions, the annual energy cost for the renovated Linn County West building
is estimated to be approximately $77,500 per year. The complete energy usage and costs
page 52 of 55
Life Cycle Analysis
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
A life cycle cost is a number representing the cost of owning and operating a building over a set
period of time for the purpose of comparing different buildings or different building strategies.
Calculation of the life cycle cost considers the initial investment in construction costs, the cost of
energy to operate the building, the cost of maintenance and effect of inflation on those costs
over the life period. These costs are distilled into a single index called the “total present worth”.
By itself, the calculated total present worth is not a very meaningful number; it becomes
meaningful when compared to the total present worth of an alternate that has been analyzed
HR Green utilized the Carrier Engineering Economic Analysis program to determine the life
cycle cost of the Linn County West Building. The estimated annual energy costs were imported
from the annual energy use analysis. Increases in energy, labor and material costs over time
are estimated by using escalation rates to inflate future costs. In order to perform the analysis
• Discount Rate – 4 %
• HVAC system maintenance costs were calculated in accordance with the 1999 ASHRAE
Applications Handbook Chapter 35 and the ASHRAE Owning and Operating Cost
page 53 of 55
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
The life cycle cost analysis estimated the total present worth of the Linn County West building to
be $19,409,030. The total present worth is the combination of the estimated initial construction
cost of $15,289,000 and the estimated annual operating cost of $207,360. Operating expenses
for each year of the analysis are discounted into today’s dollars using the discount rate in order
to calculate the total present worth. The life cycle cost report is found in Appendix C.
page 54 of 55
Summary
Linn County West Feasibility Report
September 22, 2009
Summary
Extensive work is required to adapt the former Montgomery Wards department store into
permanent County offices. Only the building’s frame, floor slabs, roof decking and side-wall
The Linn County West renovation project can achieve a LEED Silver certification in support of
The renovation can be sequenced so that County offices currently housed at Linn County West
and intended to remain there can remain open to the public throughout the construction period,
provided that the offices intended for relocation to other sites have completed their transitions.
Howard R. Green Company has developed a preliminary opinion of construction costs for the
Annual energy costs are expected to be about $77,500 for the renovated building.
The current annual Common Area Maintenance (CAM) fees are about $50,000. If Linn County
elects to pursue renovation of Linn County West, then the CAM fees should be renegotiated to
better reflect the how the County is or is not benefitted by the amenities supported by the fees.
A life cycle cost analysis results in Linn County West having a calculated total present worth of
about $19,409,000.
page 55 of 55
Appendix A
Linn County West - LEED Feasibility Calculation
Administration
Base Maximum
Feasible Number of Number of
Remarks:
Y/N/? Points Credits
Anticipated Anticipated
Credit Pts
Sustainable Sites
Prereq 1 0 Construction Activities Pollution Prevention Y 0 0 Mandatory - provide a construction activities pollution prevention plan
Credit 1 1 Site Selection Y 1 1 Existing site meets the criteria for site selection
Credit 2 5 Development Density & Community Connectivity Y 5 5 Existing site has access to services to meet community connectivity standard
Credit 3 1 Brownfield Redevelopment N 0 0 This site is not considered a Brownfield site
Credit 4.1 6 Alt. Transportation: Public Transportation Y 6 6 Existing bus routes service this site
Credit 4.2 1 Alt Tran: Bicycle Storage & Changing Rooms ? 1 1 Provide bike racks and showers, included in AOB design
Credit 4.3 3 Alt Tran: Low-Emitting & Fuel Efficient Vehicles Y 3 3 Provide designated parking spaces for low-emitting and fuel efficient vehicles
Credit 4.4 2 Alt Tran: Parking Capacity Y 2 2 No new parking or reduce the number of existing parking spaces
To achieve this credit a large portion of the parking lot would need to be converted to green space or the
Credit 5.1 1 Site Development: Protect & Restore Habitat N 0 0
roof would need to be restructured to support a green roof
To achieve this credit a large portion of the parking lot would need to be converted to green space or the
Credit 5.2 1 Site Development: Maximize Open Space N 0 0
roof would need to be restructured to support a green roof
Credit 6.1 1 Storm Water: Quantity Control ? 0 1 Decrease the existing storm water run off by 25% - collect roof & pervious paving
Credit 6.2 1 Storm Water: Quality Control ? 0 1 Pervious paving and sand filtration basins at perimeter and medians or vegetated filter strip
Credit 7.1 1 Heat Island Effect: Non-roof Y 1 1 Specify light colored or pervious paving in parking lot
Credit 7.2 1 Heat Island Effect: Roof Y 1 1 Specify light colored roof surface
Credit 8 1 Light Pollution Reduction Y 1 1 Design choices for site lighting and internal lighting to minimize light pollution
Sustainable Sites Points Anticipated 21 23
Water Efficiency
Prereq 1 0 Water Use Reduction: 20% Y 0 0 Low flow fixtures choices
Credit 1.1 2 Water Efficient Landscaping: 50% reduction Y 2 2 Use collected rain water & use drought tolerant plants
Credit 1.2 2 Water Efficient Landscaping: No Potable Water Y 2 2 Use collected rain water & use drought tolerant plants
Credit 2 2 Innovative Wastewater Technologies ? 0 2 Water conserving fixtures & use collected rain water
Credit 3 4 Water Use Reduction Y 2 4 Water conserving fixtures & use collected rain water
Water Efficiency Points Anticipated 6 10
Energy & Atmosphere
Prereq 1 0 Fundamental Commissioning Y 0 0 Mandatory - provide base commissioning for the project
Prereq 2 0 Minimum Energy Performance Y 0 0 Mandatory - exceed ASHREA 90.1 2007 standards by 5%
Prereq 3 0 Fundamental Refrigerant Management Y 0 0 Mandatory - no CFC are currently being used in the building
Credit 1 19 Optimize Energy Performance Y 7 11 Improved thermal performance of building envelope, high efficiency system
Credit 2 7 On-Site Renewable Energy N 0 0 To achieve this credit solar panels or wind generators would need to be installed
Credit 3 2 Enhanced Commissioning Y 2 2 Contract for full commissioning services, which is a wise choice for a public building this size
Credit 4 2 Enhanced Refrigerant Management Y 2 2 HVAC system choices, ground source heat pump
Credit 5 3 Measurement & Verification Y 3 3 Develop and implement a measurement and verification plan
Negotiate with utility provider to purchase a percentage of power as green power. While the impact on the
Credit 6 2 Green Power ? 0 2 project is minimal, the requirement to make a long term commitment that effects operating costs makes
this credit less desirable.
Energy & Atmosphere Points Anticipated 14 20
Administration
Base Maximum
Feasible Number of Number of
Comments: estimated task needed to achieve this credit
Y/N/? Points Credits
Anticipated Anticipated
Materials & Resources
Prereq 1 0 Storage & Collection of Recyclables Y 0 0 Space assigned for recycling and signs
Credit 1.1 3 Building Reuse: Maintain Existing Walls, Floors, Roof ? 0 2 Reuse building structure and shell, minus opening for improving natural light levels
Credit 1.2 1 Building Reuse: 50% Non-Structural Elements N 0 0 To achieve this credit 50% of interior elements would need to be reused
Credit 2 2 Construction Waste Management Y 1 2 Specifications to require recycling of waste during construction
Credit 3 2 Material Reuse N 0 0 Specify salvaged materials be used on the project
Credit 4 2 Recycled Content: ? 0 2 Specify products with recycled content
Credit 5 2 Regional Materials: Y 1 2 Specify products produced within a 500 mile radius of the site
Credit 6 1 Rapidly Renewable Materials N 0 0 Specify products made from plants that are harvested within a 10-year or shorter cycle.
Credit 7 1 Certified Wood N 0 0 Specify wood that is certified by the Forestry Stewardship Council
Materials & Resources Points Anticipated 2 8
Indoor Environmental Quality
Prereq 1 0 Minimum IAQ Performance Y 0 0 Code requires this level of IAQ
Prereq 2 0 Environmental Tobacco Smoke Control Y 0 0 State law requires ETSC
Credit 1 1 Outdoor Air delivery Monitoring Y 1 1 Include outdoor air monitoring in mechanical system
Additional ventilation is required by code, but the level to achieve this credit would have a negative impact
Credit 2 1 Increased Ventilation N 0 0
on EA credit 1
Credit 3.1 1 Const. IAQ Management Plan: During Const. Y 1 1 Control filtration per standards and documentation
Credit 3.2 1 Const. IAQ Management Plan: Before Occupancy ? 0 1 Slow flush of building while occupied
Credit 4.1 1 Low-emitting Materials: Adhesive & sealants Y 1 1 Specify products with low VOC's
Credit 4.2 1 Low-emitting Materials: Paints & coatings Y 1 1 Specify products with low VOC's
Credit 4.3 1 Low-emitting Materials: Carpet systems Y 1 1 Specify products with low VOC's
Credit 4.4 1 Low-emitting Materials: Composite Wood N 0 0 Specify composite wood products that have no urea-formaldehyde resins
Credit 5 1 Indoor Chemical & Pollutant Source Control ? 0 1 Design building to standards outlined in this credit description
Credit 6.1 1 Controllability of Systems: Lighting Y 1 1 Provide controllable task lighting for work spaces
Credit 6.2 1 Controllability of Systems: Thermal Comfort N 0 0 Additional zones for the HVAC system
Credit 7.1 1 Thermal Comfort: Design Y 1 1 Build to the design standard of this credit for the mechanical system
Credit 7.2 1 Thermal Comfort: Verification Y 1 1 Conduct a post occupancy survey
Credit 8.1 1 Daylight & Views: 75% of spaces (light level) ? 0 1 Increase natural light levels through windows and skylights
The shape of the building does not lend itself to providing view to the outside for the required percentage of
Credit 8.2 1 Daylight & Views: 90% of spaces (view to outside) N 0 0
the building
Indoor Environmental Quality Points Anticipated 8 11
Innovation & Design
Credit 1 5 Innovation in Design ? 0 2 Possible place to pick up some points if needed
Credit 2 1 LEED AP Y 1 1 Have a LEED AP on design staff
Innovation & Design Points Anticipated 1 3
Regional Priority
Credit 1 4 Regional Priority Credit 4 4
SS 2 Development Density & Community Connectivity Y
Up to 4 points can be achieved for Regional Priority. An additional point is awarded to the project for
SS 4.1 Alt. Transportation: Public Transportation Y
achieving the credits determined by the USGBC as important for the area. The credits listed are the
SS 4.2 Alt Tran: Bicycle Storage & Changing Rooms ?
credits that are eligible for regional priority for this site. Of the 6 available, we have determined that 2 are
SS 6.1 Storm Water: Quantity Control ?
easy to achieve and 4 have a moderate impact on the project and should be considered.
WE 2 Innovative Wastewater Technologies ?
MR 2 Construction Waste Management (75%) ?
Regional Priority Points Anticipated 4 4
Total 110 56 79
O:\PROJ\196530J\REPORT\images & additional documentation\[LEED_NC v.3 cost spreadsheet.XLS]Sheet1
Appendix B
Annual Cost Summary
Linn County - Feasibility Study Model 09/21/2009
Howard R. Green Company 11:28AM
Cooling 9.4%
Heating 9.6%
Pumps 5.2%
1. Annual Costs
Annual Cost Percent of Total
Component ($) ($/ft²) (%)
Air System Fans 7,784 0.069 10.1
Cooling 7,248 0.064 9.4
Heating 7,445 0.066 9.6
Pumps 4,011 0.036 5.2
Cooling Tower Fans 4,341 0.039 5.6
HVAC Sub-Total 30,829 0.274 39.8
Lights 28,161 0.250 36.4
Electric Equipment 17,495 0.155 22.6
Misc. Electric 879 0.008 1.1
Misc. Fuel Use 0 0.000 0.0
Non-HVAC Sub-Total 46,535 0.413 60.2
Grand Total 77,364 0.687 100.0
Note: Cost per unit floor area is based on the gross building floor area.
1. Annual Costs
Annual Cost Percent of Total
Component ($/yr) ($/ft²) (%)
HVAC Components
Electric 23,384 0.208 30.2
Natural Gas 7,444 0.066 9.6
Fuel Oil 0 0.000 0.0
Propane 0 0.000 0.0
Remote Hot Water 0 0.000 0.0
Remote Steam 0 0.000 0.0
Remote Chilled Water 0 0.000 0.0
HVAC Sub-Total 30,829 0.274 39.9
Non-HVAC Components
Electric 46,532 0.413 60.1
Natural Gas 0 0.000 0.0
Fuel Oil 0 0.000 0.0
Propane 0 0.000 0.0
Remote Hot Water 0 0.000 0.0
Remote Steam 0 0.000 0.0
Non-HVAC Sub-Total 46,532 0.413 60.1
Grand Total 77,361 0.687 100.0
Note: Cost per unit floor area is based on the gross building floor area.
2500
2000
Cost ($)
1500
1000
500
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Month
1. HVAC Component Costs
Air System Fans Cooling Heating Pumps Cooling Towers HVAC Total
Month ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($)
January 417 49 2,343 17 0 2,826
February 372 48 1,425 15 0 1,860
March 394 246 880 300 48 1,868
April 404 274 185 286 109 1,258
May 609 594 7 404 425 2,039
June 1,232 1,479 0 706 986 4,403
July 1,403 1,859 0 817 1,179 5,258
August 1,241 1,598 0 704 970 4,513
September 571 639 7 406 424 2,047
October 410 361 243 325 200 1,539
November 339 51 649 14 0 1,053
December 392 50 1,706 16 0 2,164
Total 7,784 7,248 7,445 4,011 4,341 30,829
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Month
1. HVAC Costs
Remote Hot Remote Chilled
Electric Natural Gas Fuel Oil Propane Water Remote Steam Water
Month ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($)
January 484 2,343 0 0 0 0 0
February 435 1,425 0 0 0 0 0
March 989 880 0 0 0 0 0
April 1,072 185 0 0 0 0 0
May 2,032 7 0 0 0 0 0
June 4,403 0 0 0 0 0 0
July 5,258 0 0 0 0 0 0
August 4,513 0 0 0 0 0 0
September 2,040 7 0 0 0 0 0
October 1,297 243 0 0 0 0 0
November 404 649 0 0 0 0 0
December 458 1,706 0 0 0 0 0
Total 23,384 7,444 0 0 0 0 0
2. Non-HVAC Costs
Remote Hot
Electric Natural Gas Fuel Oil Propane Water Remote Steam
Month ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($)
January 3,770 0 0 0 0 0
February 3,754 0 0 0 0 0
March 3,634 0 0 0 0 0
April 3,532 0 0 0 0 0
May 3,467 0 0 0 0 0
June 4,613 0 0 0 0 0
July 4,326 0 0 0 0 0
August 4,613 0 0 0 0 0
September 3,504 0 0 0 0 0
October 3,621 0 0 0 0 0
November 3,810 0 0 0 0 0
December 3,888 0 0 0 0 0
Total 46,532 0 0 0 0 0
Moline, IL Yorkville, IL
1515 5th Avenue 651 Prairie Pointe
Heritage Place, Suite 102 Suite 201
Moline, IL 61265 Yorkville, IL 60560-6506
309.764.1220 630.553.7560
FAX 309.764.1921 FAX 630.553.7646
800.214.2731
www.hrgreen.com