Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Training toolkit
The Commonwealth of Learning 1999 Any part of this document may be reproduced without permission but with acknowledgement to The Commonwealth of Learning and Asian Development Bank. Commercial use of these materials is prohibited without the prior written permission of The Commonwealth of Learning and Asian Development Bank. ISBN 1-895369-66-5
Published by: The Commonwealth of Learning 600 1285 West Broadway Vancouver, British Columbia Canada V6H 3X8 Telephone: (1 604) 775 8200 Fax: (1 604) 775 8210 Email: info@col.org Asian Development Bank P.O. Box 789 0980 Manila Philippines Telephone: (63 2) 632 4444 Fax: (63 2) 632 2444
FOREWORD
Human development is one of the strategic objectives of the Asian Development Bank. The Bank recognises that social and economic development ultimately depends on the quality of human development. People with basic education are more productive and more likely to play an active role in development. Well-nourished people are healthier and learn better. The synergies among education, health and nutrition are well documented, and it is universally recognised that investment in human development is an essential component of any development plan. The Bank has been investing directly in human development for more than twenty years. Since 1990 alone the Bank has provided over $2 billion and $.5 billion for health, or about seven percent of overall Bank lending for development in that period. Within its education portfolio, there has been a substantial shift in recent years towards primary, lower secondary, and non-formal education in recognition of the fact that investment in basic education has a much higher rate of return. The Bank continues to support higher and technical-vocational education but is increasing its focus on basic education. Within basic education, the Bank understands that quality and access are perhaps the two most critical issues. People must be able to attend school, and the education provided to them must be good enough to enable them to learn effectively. Provision of adequately trained teachers is all too often an impediment to providing quality basic education. Distance education has been shown to be an effective means of reaching untrained teachers in remote areas, enabling teachers to receive information and techniques that would otherwise have to be acquired through prohibitively expensive classroom-based instruction. The Bank has in the last decade supported a number of regional activities in the area of distance education, and extended that support to the area of distance education for primary teacher training in the context of a regional technical assistance project implemented together with United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and The Commonwealth of Learning. The project aimed to develop national action plans for primary teacher training through distance education in selected countries and to develop capacity to plan and implement distance education programmes. The Commonwealth of Learning collaborated with the Bank to undertake a series of training workshops in distance education and to develop materials for these workshops. Those materials comprise three topics in this series of six: (i) planning and management of open and distance learning, (ii) use and integration of media in open and distance learning, and (iii) designing open and distance learning materials. The materials have been designed in a flexible manner so that they can be used by a
variety of trainers in a variety of situations. Their basic aim is to contribute to the development of essential skills related to the design and implementation of distance education programmes an aim of great importance to both the Bank and The Commonwealth of Learning in their efforts to ensure that quality education is made available to all persons in a cost-effective manner.
YANG WEIMIN Director Agriculture and Social Sectors Department (East) Asian Development Bank
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FOREWORD Background and Introduction TOPIC 1: TOPIC 2: TOPIC 3: TOPIC 4: TOPIC 5: TOPIC 6: Introduction to Open and Distance Learning Operational Structures Operational Issues Course Planning and Development Course Delivery and Learner Support Quality, Research, and Evaluation
iii
Each of the training toolkits will incorporate several elements including: 1. detailed trainers guide including training strategies, exercises and activities 2. master overhead transparencies 3. recommended reading list 4. case studies of best practices The toolkits are designed to stand alone although it is envisaged that trainers may choose to use complementary segments from other kits in order to customise training workshops for particular audiences. It is assumed that the ultimate user of the toolkit, the trainers, will have extensive experience and knowledge of the subject area and will augment and embellish as required. Professional staff at COL were responsible for developing the preliminary blueprint for each of the six topic areas. The International Extension College, Cambridge, UK, was then commissioned to prepare the toolkits. IEC staff, COL staff and trainers, who were responsible for the first pilot test of the materials, consulted regularly throughout the development process.
A special thank you is extended to Dr. Charles Currin, Senior Education Specialist, Asian Development Bank, who has provided encourage and support throughout the RETA project. Sincere appreciation also goes to Dr. Barbara Spronk, Executive Director, IEC and her staff, for their dedication, commitment and hard work in developing and producing the toolkits. Finally, a special note regarding the case studies section of the toolkit and the gracious co-operation of the many colleagues from around the world who so readily agreed to share their experiences and prepared a case study for inclusion in the toolkits. The training of people in the practice of distance education continues to be a priority for The Commonwealth of Learning and we are hopeful that this series of toolkits will be a valuable resource for the distance education community. We of course would welcome your comments and feedback so that we can continue to improve and enhance the toolkits.
Interspersed throughout the materials are examples of the issue or practice that is being outlined. These examples have been set out in indented sections like the following: Example: The Open School was set up in India in 1979 to accelerate the provision of basic education for all and to serve as a model of cost-effective alternatives to secondary education. Suggestions for involving your workshop participants in the generation of additional examples that are drawn from their own experience are set out in screened boxes like the following:
vi
Discussion: Ask participants to spend 15 minutes with a partner discussing their institutions experiences with introducing a new technology. Ask each pair to produce one lesson they learned from that experience, to share with the group. The case studies are provided as yet another source of illustrative examples of actual practice. These materials are not intended as a course in open and distance learning. There are no objectives, no prescriptions, and no statements of what you should be able to do as a result of having worked through the kit. Neither are the materials intended as an outline of an actual workshop, for you are faced with new audiences, new contexts, and new challenges each time you set out to conduct a workshop. You may adapt these materials to any situation, as in the following examples: you may be asked to provide a three-day workshop to a group of ministry officials and high-level managers from a variety of educational institutions and agencies, all of whom are new to the idea of open and distance learning, to introduce them to the challenges of undertaking an open and distance learning program; or you might have two weeks to spend with an audience that consists of the deans and department heads of a variety of faculties from one institution, who have been given the taskof developing open and distance learning programs in their units and who have asked for a workshop that will give them an overview of what is involved; or you may be asked to do a one-day workshop on open and distance learning for field workers in development projects who are interested in incorporating some distance methods in their work.
As an experienced trainer you know that designing an effective workshop is the same as designing an effective course: the participants needs and contexts come first, and your decisions about what you will present and how you will present it will follow from what you are able to find out about your audience. Of course your workshop design will also be influenced by your own experience, expertise, and point of view because you bring a wealth of knowledge, skills, and understanding to your task. Consequently, a trainers kit can aim only to supplement your own resources and to offer some ideas and materials to use or not use as you choose, based on your tasks and needs. We hope you will find these materials useful. They are based on the real-life training experiences of a range of distance educators, some of whom prepared the outline for the kit, some of whom prepared the topic-by-topic materials, some of whom provided the case studies, and yet others who reviewed and piloted the first version and offered valuable advice and suggestions as a result. We look to you for continuing advice and suggestions, especially in the form of training materials that you have found useful and would be willing to share with others via the agency of the Commonwealth of Learning. Please contact the COL Project Manager, Patricia McWilliams, at the address provided in this kit, with your comments.
vii
Overview Source materials for this topic The concept of open and distance learning Definitions Distinguishing the types of open and distance learning Time and place continuum Open and distance learning systems Advantages of open and distance learning A systems approach to open and distance learning Functions of open and distance learning Kinds of open and distance learning Practice exercises Categorising various institutions Application to home institutions 1. Overview These materials support an introductory discussion on the topic of open and distance learning. The discussion is in two parts. The first part discusses the concept of open and distance learning by defining terms and distinguishing the various types of open and distance learning, and then by establishing each type along a time and place continuum. The various sections of the first part can be used as follows: The definitions section focuses on the six features common to most definitions of open and distance learning. You may want to reword these definitions, or add to them. A discussion of accreditation, for example, can show how open and distance learning involves both teaching and learning and thereby is different from entirely self-directed learning. A discussion of two-way communication can raise points about learning theory that are central to distance approaches. A discussion of industrialised processes can be a starting point for discussing ways in which the teaching function in open and distance learning is reconfigured into course development and course delivery, setting open and distance learning apart from more conventional approaches to teaching and learning.
1-1
The distinctions section provides material that will help you establish a working vocabulary for your workshop. Some examples are provided, but you will want to draw examples from your own experience and from the experience of your participants. The time and place continuum section provides an opportunity to discuss the varieties of delivery systems possible in open and distance learning. Again, you will want to draw examples from both your own and your participants experience.
The second part looks at the types of open and distance learning systems, and can be used as follows: The first section lists the advantages that open and distance learning offers. This section is intended to prompt discussion of the problems that participants expect open and distance learning to help them solve. Open and distance learning applications are then studied using a systems approach, which recognises that all parts of the system are interrelated. Then the functions list provides one way of describing and labelling the tasks involved in operating an open and distance learning programme. You may have another list. The point is to emphasise how distance makes a difference in carrying out these functions. Finally, the modes or types of open and distance learning institutions and programmes are described. Again, you will doubtless have many examples to offer, and you may also want to take this opportunity to start participants thinking about the mode of open and distance learning in which they are operating or plan to operate.
1.1 Source materials for this topic Jackling, N. Weaving my own design. In M. Parer (ed.) Development, design, and distance education. Churchill, Australia: Centre for Distance Learning, Monash University, 1989. Keegan, D. The foundations of distance education. London: Croom Helm, 1996. Keegan, D. (ed.) Theoretical principles of distance education. London: Routledge, 1993. Koul, B.N., and J. Jenkins (eds.) Distance education: a spectrum of case studies. London: Kogan Page, 1993. Mugridge, I. (ed.) Distance education in single and dual mode universities. Vancouver: Commonwealth of Learning, 1992. Mugridge, I. The language of distance and open learning. Journal of Distance Education, IV: 2, pp. 8385, 1989. Sewart, D. et al. (eds.). Distance education: international perspectives. London: Croom Helm, 1983.
1-2
Sparkes, J. The problem of creating a discipline of distance education. Distance Education, 4:2, pp. 17986, 1983. 2. The concept of open and distance learning 2.1 Definitions There is no one definition of open and distance learning. Rather, there are many approaches to defining the term. Most definitions, however, pay attention to the following characteristics: separation of teacher and learner in time or place, or in both time and place; institutional accreditation; that is, learning is accredited or certified by some institution or agency. This type of learning is distinct from learning through your own effort without the official recognition of a learning institution; use of mixed-media courseware, including print, radio, and television broadcasts, video and audio cassettes, computer-based learning, and telecommunications. Courseware tends to be pre-tested and validated before use; two-way communication allows learners and tutors to interact as distinguished from the passive receipt of broadcast signals. Communication can be synchronous or asynchronous; possibility of face-to-face meetings for tutorials, learnerlearner interaction, library study, and laboratory or practice sessions; and use of industrialised processes; that is, in large-scale open and distance learning operations, labour is divided and tasks are assigned to various staff who work together in course development teams. Discussion: Take advantage of the wealth of examples available both from your own and your participants experience. The case studies provided with this kit describe institutions around the world that exemplify the characteristics of open and distance learning. 2.2 Distinguishing the types of open and distance learning The term open and distance learning and its definition are relatively new in the field of education, having gained prominence only in the past 15 to 20 years. The language and terms used to describe distance learning activities can still be confusing, and geographical differences in usage for example, between North America and Europe can add to the confusion. Among the more commonly used terms related to open and distance learning are the following: correspondence education, home study, independent study, external studies, continuing education, distance teaching, selfinstruction, adult education, technology-based or mediated education, learnercentred education, open learning, open access, flexible learning, and distributed learning.
1-3
Correspondence education, home study, and independent study These distance learning methods are: well over a century old; based on stand-alone, self-study materials. Learners do not have to leave their homes to study; and often print-based with communication through postal services or telephone. They can, however, use a variety of means for tutorlearner contact, including the postal system, telephone, electronic mail, television and radio broadcasts, and video and audio cassettes. Example: Many university programmes in North America have, in the last 15 years, renamed their correspondence programmes to more current titles such as open and distance learning or independent study. External studies The term external studies: applies to instruction that takes place somewhere other than on a central campus, such as a classroom remote from campus; and includes a variety of delivery options like audio, video, or computer conferences or home study. Example: The Centre for External Studies at the University of Namibia is responsible for open and distance learning programming. Continuing education The term continuing education: usually applies to non-credit education; refers to courses that can be delivered on campus or at a distance; and has varied meanings. Example: See the case study on the Distance Education Unit at the University of Botswana, which is part of continuing education at the university. Distance teaching The term distance teaching: refers to only half of the open and distance learning equation: open and distance learning encompasses not only teaching but learning; and emphasises the teachers role rather than the system.
1-4
Self-instruction The term self-instruction refers to a process in which: materials take learners step-by-step through an instructional process; self-assessment exercises are a central feature; and instruction can be paper-based or computer-based. Example: The Faculty of Medicine at Chulalongkorn University in Thailand makes a variety of self-instructional packages available via computer-assisted instruction on topics such as the circulatory system. Many language schools offer self-instructional packages that consist of print materials and audio cassettes. Adult education The term adult education: emphasises the principles of adult learning, often known as andragogy, as compared to pedagogy, or child-centred learning. Example: See the case study on the University of Botswana, Distance Education Unit, which offers a Certificate in Adult Education at a distance. Technology-based or mediated education The term technology-based education: refers to systems of teaching and learning in which a technology other than print has a major role; and takes two major forms: stand-alone (for example, computer-assisted learning and computer-managed learning) and conferenced (for example, audio, video, or computer). Examples: The University of the West Indies uses audio conferencing to link its various campuses and learning centres. Two of the postgraduate degrees available in distance open and distance learning those offered by Athabasca University and the Open University of the United Kingdom use computer conferencing as a primary mode of delivery. See the case studies on both the University of Guyana, Institute of Distance and Continuing Education, which uses audio teleconferencing, and the Open Learning Information Network in Canada, which delivers courses via the World Wide Web. Learner-centred education In learner centred education, integrity and freedom of the individual is primary. Therefore, the teaching and learning process provides:
An Overview of Open and Distance Learning 1-5
flexible sequences of study; negotiated objectives and content; negotiated learning methods; negotiated methods of assessment; and a choice of support mechanisms. Open learning The educational philosophy of open learning emphasises giving learners choices about: medium or media, whether print, on-line, television, or video; place of study, whether at home, in the workplace, or on campus; pace of study, whether closely paced or unstructured; support mechanisms, whether tutors on demand, audio conferences, or computerassisted learning; and entry and exit points. Example: Many institutions use the term open in their names. See the case studies for: Open Access College and the Open Learning Institute of Charles Sturt University, both in Australia; Open Learning Information Network in Canada; Indira Gandhi National Open University in India; Open University of the University of the Philippines; and Open University of Sri Lanka. Open access The term open access implies a lack of: formal entry requirements; prerequisite credentials; and an entrance examination. Flexible learning The term flexible learning emphasises the creation of environments for learning that have the following characteristics: convergence of open and distance learning methods, media, and classroom strategies; learner-centred philosophy; recognition of diversity in learning styles and learners needs;
1-6 An Overview of Open and Distance Learning
recognition of the importance of equity in curriculum and pedagogy; use of a variety of learning resources and media; and fostering of lifelong learning habits and skills in learners and staff. Example: See the case study for Deakin University, which describes the challenges of implementing a flexible learning system. Distributed learning The term distributed learning: emphasises the learning itself rather than the type of technology used or the separation between teacher and learner; makes learning possible beyond classrooms; and when combined with classroom modes, becomes flexible learning. Discussion: You and your participants can provide a wealth of examples of different types of delivery systems from your experience in open and distance learning. The case studies included with this kit are a ready source of examples as well. 2.3 Time and Place Continuum Open and distance learning programmes fall somewhere along two continua: the continuum of time and the continuum of place. The place continuum has at one end all learners and their tutor or instructor gathered at the same place, and at the other end all learners and their tutor or instructor in different places. The time continuum has at one end all learners and their tutor or instructor interacting in real time, that is, at the same time, and at the other end all learners and their tutor or instructor interacting at different times. The following chart demonstrates how these two continua intersect. Their coordinates are numbered and match four scenarios for open and distance learning. Most open and distance learning providers use a combination of the four scenarios. Scenarios for Open and Distance Learning Same Time Different Time Same Place Different Place 1 3 2 4
1. Same place and same time: Classroom teaching, face-to-face tutorials and seminars, workshops, and residential schools.
1-7
Example: See the case study for the Open Learning Institute, Charles Sturt University in Australia, for an example of an institution that relies on residential schools to provide interaction between learners and tutors is being challenged. The case study for the University of Nairobi describes a programme that is implementing more residential schools, to replace its tutorials. 2. Same place but different time: Learning resource centres, which learners visit at their leisure. Example: See the case study for the Open Access College in Australia for an example of an institution that has a number of resource centres. 3. Different place but same time: Audio conferences and video conferences; television with one-way video, two-way audio; radio with listenerresponse capability; and telephone tutorials. Example: See the case study for the Indira Gandhi National Open University for an example of an institution that is using audio conferencing and television with one-way video and two-way audio. 4. Different place and different time: Home study, computer conferencing, tutorial support by e-mail, and fax communication. Example: The case studies provided with this kit describe a wide variety of ways to make learning materials available for this kind of independent study. 3. Open and distance learning systems 3.1 Advantages of open and distance learning Open and distance learning offers a number of advantages to both learners and to providers of opportunities for learning. Problems such as distance and time, which are barriers to conventional learning, are overcome in open and distance learning. Overcoming physical distance Open and distance learning can overcome problems of physical distance for: learners in remote locations who are unable or unwilling to physically attend a campus; and learners and teachers geographically separated in that teachers in urban settings instruct learners in rural settings.
1-8
Example: See the case study on the University of Guyana, Institute of Distance and Continuing Education, for an example of an institution that is serving a widely scattered and remote population using open and distance learning. Solving time or scheduling problems Open and distance learning can solve time or scheduling for: client groups unwilling or unable to assemble together frequently; learners engaged in full-time or part-time work, both waged and volunteer; and family and community commitments. Example: See the case study for the Southern Africa Extension Unit for a description of a programme for training councillors in local government. Expanding the limited number of places available Open and distance learning can expand the limited number of places available for: campus-based institutions few in number; and stringent entrance requirements. Example: See the case study for the Open University of Sri Lanka for an example of an institution that is expanding access to university education in a country where the number of places available at conventional universities is very limited. Accommodating low or dispersed enrolments Open and distance learning can accommodate: low enrolments over a long period of time; and low enrolments in one geographic region but additional enrolments elsewhere. Example: See the case studies for the University of Guyana and the Open Access College in Australia for examples of institutions that are meeting the challenge of dispersed enrolments. Making best use of the limited number of teachers available Open and distance learning can make the best use of the few teachers available when: there is a lack of trained teaching personnel relative to demand; teachers are geographically concentrated; teachers with certain expertise are in short supply. Example: See the case study for the Open Access College, Australia.
1-9
Dealing with cultural, religious, and political considerations Open and distance learning can deal with differences, and consequently: widens womens opportunities to learn; meets the needs of populations affected by violence, war, or displacement; and makes learning possible even when group assemblies are proscribed. Discussion: Use this opportunity for a discussion of the problems your participants are trying to solve. 3.2 A systems approach to open and distance learning A systems approach sets the conditions for proceeding in an orderly way. A systems approach also recognises that all the components of the system are interrelated. A change in one component will bring about changes in the others. Open and distance learning programmes, units, and institutions use a phased model for problem solving: analyse design develop implement evaluate revise Analysis: a detailed examination of all facets of the problem What is the problem to be solved? Is the problem an instructional problem or an environmental problem? Who has the problem? What are the resources available to solve the problem? What are the constraints or limitations to be faced? Output from the analysis phase: a clear statement of the problem a detailed description of the target population identification of the resources and constraints
Design: requires the preparation of a detailed solution Who are the target population and other stakeholders? What will the solution accomplish? How will the participants be different after the course or programme? How will the participants achieve the objectives? How will the course or programme be developed? How will you know your solution is effective? Output from the design phase:
1-10 An Overview of Open and Distance Learning
a detailed plan that describes how, when, by whom, and at what cost the problem will be solved
Development: must address the following kinds of questions What strategies, media, and methods will be used for each objective or task? What learning resources will be required? Where, when, and how will learners be ensured of feedback as they practise their skills? Where, how, and when will evaluation activities be used? What will be the consequences of success or failure or both? How will the instruction be evaluated and revised? Output from the development phase: a complete course or programme package, including all materials, tools, equipment, and plans for delivery, learner support, learner evaluation, and course evaluations
Implementation: putting the solution into practice Are all necessary resources (human, physical, financial) in place? Are data collection mechanisms in place? Are problem-solving and recording mechanisms in place? Output from the implementation phase: learner progress and performance records data from a variety of sources (for example, records and solutions) other evaluation data (for example, interviews, questionnaires)
Evaluation: not an add-on but an integral component How well does the system meet the goals initially identified? How well does it meet the needs of the learners and other stakeholders? Do you have sufficient specific information? How will you obtain it? What specific changes can be made to improve the system? Output from the evaluation phase: analyses of records and data specific solutions, including time, cost, and other resource estimates
Revision: including a review of all decisions and activities of previous phases Were the original analyses complete and correct?
An Overview of Open and Distance Learning 1-11
Have circumstances changed sufficiently to require a major review of the analyses? What changes, modifications, or improvements are evident in the evaluation data? Are sufficient resources available to complete the recommended changes? What action needs to be taken? Output from the revision phase: revised course or programme, including the course materials, learner support and evaluation plan, and a revised course evaluation plan
3.3 Functions of open and distance learning Regardless of the size of the programme, unit, or institution undertaking development and implementation of an open and distance learning system, the following functions must occur at some level. Valuable considerations in relation to each open and distance learning task are listed following. Obtaining and managing money and other resources grant-sustained, cost recovery (self-financing); higher development and start-up costs; and human support relatively expensive component. Developing or acquiring programmes and courses considerable development time required for full-scale development and production; buying or leasing courses from other open and distance learning providers may be more effective use of resources; and continuum of approaches, from single author to large teams of specialists. Example: See the case study for the University of Lincolnshire and Humberside for an example of course franchising. Recruiting and promoting analyse and assess the needs of your prospective learner populations; make information available at right place and time; provide sufficient accurate information about time, cost, and effort required; provide sufficient accurate information about when, where, and how to get involved; and reassure potential learners about legitimacy and credibility. Physically producing, reproducing, storing, and disseminating materials
1-12
course materials requirements may demand print, audio, video, or computer software; dissemination may require post, courier, transport companies, telecommunications, broadcasts, or satellites; physical production and reproduction time consuming; and specialised equipment and personnel required for storage, handling, packaging, dispatch, and inventory. Enrolling and registering process varies from simple manual lists to complex electronic systems; fixed or rolling entrance dates; and range of delivery options available. Delivering programmes and courses two-way communication required; evaluation and feedback; collaboration with other agencies; library services; and record systems. Providing learner support personal support such as advice or counselling; academic support such as tutoring, grading, and examining; and face-to-face or mediated support. Examining, crediting, and granting credentials range of credit options available; exam taking and credit evaluation requirements; and involvement of professional associations and external agencies. Evaluating and revising processes, procedures, programmes, and courses learner performance; learner satisfaction; meeting goals and objectives; and resistance to change.
1-13
Training and developing staff orientation and adjustment to new technologies and approaches; and awareness of advantages and limitations of open and distance learning operations. Discussion: There are many ways of labelling and describing these functions; the ones provided here are only suggestions. Extend your list with examples from both your own and your participants experience. 3.4 Kinds of open and distance learning systems A variety of terms describe the type of educational provision that involves some version of an open learning approach and uses open and distance learning techniques to a greater or lesser extent. Single mode institution set up to offer programmes of study at a distance; some face-to-face interaction involved, but often optional; teaching and learning process mediated in some way by print, including correspondence; by audio, including radio (one-way, two-way), cassettes, telephone, or audio conferences; by video, including television (one-way, two-way), cassettes, or video conferences; and by computer, including computer-based training, e-mail, computer conferencing, or World Wide Web; characterises many of the worlds mega-universities, including Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU), Universitas Terbuka, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University (STOU), and United Kingdom Open University (UKOU). Example: See the case study for IGNOU included with this kit. Dual mode institution offers two modes: one using traditional classroom-based methods; and one using distance methods; may also offer the same course in both modes, with common examinations; regards the two types of learner as distinct: on-campus and external; and may or may not allow cross-over registrations.
1-14
Example: See the case studies for the Open Learning Institute of Charles Sturt University, the University of Nairobi, the University of Botswana, and the University of Zambia for discussions of issues facing dual mode institutions. Mixed mode institution offers learners a wide choice of modes of study; independent, group-based, or some combination; and face-to-face, mediated, or some combination; maximises flexibility of place and pace of study; the result of convergence of face-to-face and distance modes; and increasingly characterises organisations that were once single mode or dual mode. Example: The case studies for Deakin University and Murdoch University provide examples of institutions that are now mixed mode. 4. Practice exercises 4.1 Categorising various institutions Instructions: Divide the participants into small working groups (no more than five to a group). Give each group a set of three case studies a single mode institution, a dual mode institution, and a mixed mode institution without labelling the institutions as such; the case studies that are part of this kit are suitable for this purpose. Ask each group to agree on the category they think is most appropriate to each of the three institutions; list the main characteristics of each institution that justify the category; and report their findings to the group as a whole. Use the findings of the working groups as a springboard for discussion of the challenges involved in defining open and distance learning. Timeframe: Depending on the language level and experience of the participants, the small group work can take as long as an hour. Materials: Case studies (see the case studies that are included with this kit); flip chart paper or overhead transparencies, and marker pens. 4.2 Application to home institution Instructions: Ask participants to spend half an hour, working on their own, describing the programme in which they work, in terms of how the supporting institution (or department or faculty) fulfils the nine functions of an open and distance learning system that have been discussed as part of this topic.
1-15
On the basis of this description, ask them to work with a partner to determine what kinds of changes will have to take place in each of these functions to make their institution function more effectively as an open and distance learning operation. Timeframe: An hour in total, half an hour for individual work and half an hour for paired discussion. Materials: Paper and pen or pencil for each participant.
1-16
Overview Source materials for this topic The uses of open and distance learning Basic education Teacher training University level Non-formal education Technical and vocational training Structures of open and distance learning Single mode institution A department within an existing teaching institution Co-operative arrangements Hybrids Factors for choosing a structure The scale of the educational need Educational purpose Resources available Degree of autonomy and control Is there a best buy? Practice exercise Classifying open and distance learning providers 1. Overview These materials assume that you have introduced your participants to the concept of open and distance learning and discussed the political context in which open and distance learning programmes become established. On this basis, the intention of this section is to support a more detailed discussion on the topic of the various operational structures used in open and distance learning.
2-1
The discussion of operational structures is in four parts: uses for open and distance learning; administrative structures for open and distance learning; factors to consider in choosing one of these structures; and whether there is a best buy among these structures. The intention here is to prompt discussion among your participants of the kinds of open and distance learning structures they are using or considering, and why they have chosen those operational structures. 1.1 Source materials for this topic Perraton, H. Administrative structures for distance education. London: The Commonwealth Secretariat and The Commonwealth of Learning, 1991. Mugridge, I. (ed.) Distance education in single and dual mode universities. Vancouver: The Commonwealth of Learning, 1992. 2. The uses of open and distance learning Open and distance learning is provided at five main educational levels. 2.1 Basic education Open and distance learning used for providing basic education in the form of second-chance programmes for adults; and programmes for school-age children. Examples: The Open School was set up in India in 1979 to accelerate the provision of basic education for all and to serve as a model of cost-effective alternatives to secondary education. The Open Access College in Australia provides courses for both children and adults. (See the case study in this kit.)
2.2 Teacher training Teacher training is one of the most widespread purposes for which open and distance learning has been adopted, due to: the huge demand for education and a consequent shortage in the supply of teachers; the ability to retain teachers in their schools, save on resources, and bring immediate benefits to classrooms; the fact that teachers are assumed to already possess study skills and therefore are likely to succeed as distance learners;
2-2
the ability of school boards to provide teachers with motivation to study (for example, promotions and wage increases); and the ability to overcome the problems teachers face in remote schools. Teacher training at a distance has taken three forms: upgrading of existing primary school teachers; initial training of primary teachers; and upgrading of secondary school teachers. Examples: The Emergency Science Programme in Guyana, the Northern Integrated Teacher Education Programme in Uganda (NITEP) and the Strengthening Primary Education in Kenya (SPRED II). A number of institutions offer teacher training at a distance. Three institutions University of Guyana, University of Nairobi, and the University of Botswana describe their teacher training programmes in the case studies in this kit. 2.3 University level At the university level, open and distance learning may be offered through: single mode institutions; Example: Indira Gandhi National Open University and the Open University of Sri Lanka as discussed in the case studies in this kit. bimodal institutions; Example: Open Learning Institute of Charles Sturt University, the University of Botswana, the University of Guyana, the University of Nairobi, Massey University, the University of Zambia as discussed in the case studies in this kit. mixed mode institutions; and Example: Deakin University and Murdoch University as discussed in the case studies in this kit. consortia and other co-operative arrangements. Example: The Commonwealth of Learning. 2.4 Non-formal education In non-formal education, open and distance learning is offered in the following areas: rural and social development; Example: INADES, lInstitut africain pour le dveloppement economique et social-formation in Cte dIvoire.
An Overview of Open and Distance Learning 2-3
literacy; and Example: the radio schools of Latin America. health. Example: AMREF, The African Medical Research and Educational Foundation. 2.5 Technical and vocational training For technical and vocational training, open and distance learning includes workplace-based learning; and employer-sponsored schemes. Discussion: Contribute other examples of open and distance learning applications from your own and your participants experience, and from the institutions described in the case studies included in this kit. 3. Structures of open and distance learning An open and distance learning programme can be set up in a number of ways. At the risk of over-simplification, these alternatives can be described in terms of the following organisational arrangements. 3.1 Single mode institutions A single mode institution operates with a free-standing structure, assuming that the institution will itself undertake most of the following functions: designing education programmes, including acquiring and developing teaching material; tutoring and counselling; awarding credit (in formal education programmes); producing, storing, and distributing learning materials; keeping records of learners, inventory, and finance; providing administration and finance; marketing programmes and recruiting learners; and evaluating programmes and processes. The free-standing operational structures of single mode institutions: are usually autonomous; and have open and distance learning as their dominant or sole function. They can be categorised into two types.
2-4
Single purpose, single mode institutions Some open and distance learning colleges have been set up to teach a single subject, especially for teacher training. Example: William Pitcher College in Swaziland was established to provide open and distance learning courses for the in-service training of teachers. Multi-purpose, single mode institutions open universities; Example: Indira Gandhi National Open University in India, the Open University of Sri Lanka, and the Open University in Britain. open colleges, which offer courses at a number of levels; and Example: the Open Access College as discussed in the case studies in this kit, the Tanzanian National Correspondence Institute, and the National Extension College in Britain. open schools. Example: the National Open School of India and the Open Access College as discussed in the case studies in this kit. Arguments for a purpose-built system that teaches only at a distance include the following: the administrative structures of conventional educational systems are not the most suitable ones for developing and managing open and distance learning systems; conventional institutions may regard open and distance learning as a poor relation and consequently be reluctant to allocate it adequate resources; the requirements of distance learners are likely to be better served if the institution is wholly dedicated to their needs; the characteristics of the target audience are significantly different from those of campus-based learners (for example, adults have distinctive approaches to learning compared with young people at the tertiary stage of learning); the pedagogy of open and distance learning is different than that of conventional systems; and significant innovation is more likely to occur outside the framework of traditional educational institutions. Example: These distinctions were true of the early days of the open universities of the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. Discussion: Feel free to disagree with these arguments, or to add to them.
2-5
3.2 A department within an existing teaching institution Many universities or colleges decide to set up a distance learning department that works alongside other departments, specialising in open and distance learning but within an otherwise conventional institution. Arguments for such bimodal or dual mode institutions include the following: the structured learning materials prepared by course teams provide consistent quality of instruction to both off-campus and on-campus learners; self-instructional materials encourage learning through activities and independent learning; learners are liberated from the constraints of the traditional lecture and tutorial system, and can move from one mode to another according to their needs; learners benefit from the esteem that comes from a conventional university and demonstrated parity of standards; and staff are freed to teach in more interactive ways. Bimodal structures can take two forms. Subject-oriented departments Subject-oriented departments teach externally in their own discipline. Example: At the University of the South Pacific the Department of Education launched the first open and distance learning programmes for teacher education before the university began to teach at a distance in other subjects. Distance education departments Distance education departments take the main responsibility for planning and running open and distance learning within a bimodal institution. Examples: The Distance Education Unit of the University of Botswana, and a number of institutes, such as the Institute of Distance and Continuing Education of the University of Guyana, the Institute of Distance and Continuing Education at the University of Papua New Guinea, and the Open Learning Institute of Charles Sturt University, as discussed in the case studies in this kit. Variants within this structure include: distance education departments that are purely administrative with no teaching functions;
2-6
Example: The University of Zambia can require staff to teach both face to face and at a distance but the specialist department only co-ordinates and distributes materials. specialist open and distance learning departments that have a pedagogical function; and Example: Murdoch University had at one time a specialist department that did not employ its own subject specialists but had staff with educational skills in open and distance learning who played a role in the development and use of materials that went beyond the purely administrative; and external teaching departments with their own subject-specialist staff concerned solely with external learners. Example: The University of Wisconsin Extension has a staff of well over 1000 and a full range of academic departments but exists in parallel with the University of Wisconsin.
3.3 Co-operative arrangements In a co-operative arrangement for open and distance learning, institutions work together to teach and support learners and distribute the various functions between them. A distinction can be drawn between two types of co-operative arrangements. National co-operative structures The functions of preparing materials, giving tutorial support to learners, and awarding credit may be carried out by different partners. Examples: The Chinese Television University produces materials that are used by a federation of universities who provide tutorial support to back the centrally produced courses. The National Extension College in the United Kingdom produces flexi-study packs of learning materials, which colleges can purchase for their own use, with advice from the NEC on running open and distance learning programmes. The University of Lincolnshire and Humberside have franchised their courses to other universities. The Open Learning Foundation is a consortium of tertiary level institutions in the United Kingdom which produces course material packs that are available at a discount to member institutions and at full price to non-member institutions.
2-7
Co-operative arrangements need not be permanent or all-purpose. Example: In Australia three universities co-operated on the development and running of a degree-level course in womens studies, in a situation in which it would have been difficult for any one of them to offer the course on its own, and in which the universities were not working together on their whole range of programmes. International co-operative structures Co-operation is also possible across national frontiers. Example: Commonwealth Heads of Government agreed in 1987 to set up The Commonwealth of Learning in order to promote co-operation in open and distance learning within the Commonwealth and to facilitate the sharing of resources among Commonwealth colleges and universities. Several other institutions have been established to promote international cooperation in open and distance learning. Examples: CIFFAD, the Consortium international francophone de formation a distance, set up with support from Canada and France with broadly comparable objectives to those of The Commonwealth of Learning;
CREAD,
the Consorcio-red educacion a distancia, which links open and distance learning organisations throughout the Western Hemisphere; and the European Association of Distance Teaching Universities, working on the sharing and joint development of teaching material.
EADTU,
To date, these organisations are not enrolling learners directly but are providing services to support the work of national institutions. 3.4 Hybrids The operational structures outlined above are somewhat arbitrary, and there are both possible and actual hybrids among them. For example, in several cases an institution has broader functions than this account of structures might suggest. Examples: The Indira Gandhi National Open University serves both as an autonomous institution and a co-operative body in that it has co-ordinating and funding responsibilities for the other Indian open universities.
2-8
The Lesotho Distance Teaching Centre and Tanzania National Correspondence Institute are multi-purpose institutions but in their teacher education programmes work within a cooperative framework that might be labelled a national cooperative structure. In addition, an open and distance learning programme may be mounted by an organisation that is quasi-autonomous and free-standing in some ways but not in others because it is one component of a multi-campus, state-wide, or nation-wide institution. Examples: The Open University of the Philippines is one of six universities that comprise the University of the Philippines as discussed in the case studies in this kit. The Tele-universit of Qubec is one institution among several that comprise the Universit de Qubec. Empire State College in New York is part of the SUNY (State University of New York) system. Yet another variant is the open and distance learning programme that is not yet institutionalised but is rather organised as a project, usually under the auspices of a government ministry, which may or may not eventually become an established component of the overall provision of education overseen by that ministry. Examples: Several upgrading schemes for primary teachers are operating under the auspices of ministries of education, as projects funded by donor agencies, and not yet formally institutionalised. Examples include NITEP (Northern Integrated Teacher Education Project) in Uganda and the SPRED projects (Strengthening of Primary Education) in Kenya both offer upgrading schemes for primary teachers. Athabasca University in Canada operated as a project of the government of the province of Alberta for a number of years before being chartered as the provinces fourth university. Discussion: Are there arrangements in your own and your participants experience that do not easily fit in any of these categories? 4. Factors for choosing a structure Of these various organisational structures, no one way is best. Rather, the choice of organisational structure depends on a number of factors, including educational goals and political and economic circumstances. Four factors that influence the choice of structure are discussed here.
2-9
4.1 The scale of the educational need If the intent is to recruit learners in large numbers, it may be unrealistic to consider anything other than an open university with a full range of functions. Example: Several open universities are labelled megauniversities because they enrol one hundred thousand learners or more. Examples include the Indira Gandhi National Open University as discussed in the case studies in this kit, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University in Thailand, Universitas Terbuka in Indonesia, and the Open University of the United Kingdom. On the other hand it would not make sense to set up such an institution if the intention was to recruit only a thousand learners. Example: In Malaysia, doubts about the viability of degreelevel open and distance learning led to the choice of a bimodal approach with the off-campus programme of Universiti Sains Malaysia recruiting learners in hundreds rather than thousands. 4.2 Educational purpose If the purpose is narrowly defined for example, the upgrading of primary school teachers the choice is likely to be limited to a single purpose, distance learning institution, a department within an existing institution, or a co-operative scheme. The level at which the scheme is to work will also be important. For example, it may be difficult to set up a unit within another institution if the parent institution has no experience in teaching at the level concerned. There are significant exceptions, however. Example: The Matriculation Programme for Women is a successful offering of Allama Iqbal Open University in Pakistan, and the University of Nairobi successful housed a unit working at secondary level for many years. 4.3 Resources available The level and nature of the human, physical, and financial resources likely to be available also affect the choice of structure. Example: Small countries with a limited educational infrastructure that already have difficulty in staffing a single conventional university are likely to have difficulty finding the staff for a separate open university.
2-10
When populations are low it is difficult to achieve the economies of scale that make open and distance learning attractive. Small states are likely to be constrained in the way they use open and distance learning. At the same time, the isolation of small island countries suggests a role for open and distance learning in providing educational resources that would not otherwise be available. Examples: Countries in the Caribbean and the South Pacific have been able to resolve the dilemma of low learner populations by calling on the resources of the two regional universities, both of which have launched programmes of open and distance learning. The University of Namibia is extending the reach of its programmes in this large but sparsely populated country by giving the Centre for External Studies the mandate to offer its highest demand courses at a distance. The price of this association may be that a unit teaching at a distance in one of these countries lacks the autonomy that may be enjoyed by institutions in larger countries. 4.4 Degree of autonomy and control If we classify the structures according to the degree of autonomy they allow the open and distance learning programme, then open universities lie at one end of the scale and some of the co-operative schemes at the other. Political realities are important to consider. There may be a political commitment to establishing a single mode or free-standing institution that could not be met by any other alternative. Or such an establishment may be strongly opposed by other educational or political interests and thereby rendered impossible. Ease of access to services from other institutions may determine how far it is desirable or realistic to seek a degree of autonomy or co-operation. Examples: The case study for the Open Learning Institute of Charles Sturt University describes the challenges of the politics involved in collaborative arrangements with other institutions. The Open Learning Institute of British Columbia (now the Open Learning Agency) decided from the outset to seek its subject-matter expertise primarily from the many tertiary level institutions that were already operating in the lower mainland of the province, rather than to hire permanent academic staff. This reliance on academics in other institutions could be seen as a form of dependence. On the other hand, it could also be seen as a form of collaboration with other institutions that helped establish the OLIs legitimacy as a provider of university-level programmes.
2-11
An organisation may wish to control some aspects or functions of the open and distance learning task and not others. Example: If the same organisation plans to develop teaching material and provide tutorial support for it, then it is likely to choose one of the bimodal structures. If on the other hand it plans to concentrate on the production of material and leave tutoring to a more local organisation, a co-operative structure will have its advantages. Example: The Open Learning Institute in Hong Kong has developed co-operative arrangements with other institutions of tertiary education in Hong Kong to provide tutorial support for its learners, and works with universities outside Hong Kong from which it is buying teaching materials. It also develops some teaching materials in-house. Who has control over and responsibility for teaching is a major issue in bimodal organisations. When open and distance learning units are only administrative, control over what is taught at a distance, who teaches it, and to a large extent how it is taught remains in the hands of the academic units. It is more often argued, however, that the development and production of good learning materials and the provision of tutorial services requires specialist skills that are somewhat different from those needed for conventional teaching. This leads to the variant in which open and distance learning units have staff with these skills to work with the academics, led by managers who have among their tasks negotiating with academic units and persuading them to offer some of their courses at a distance. Discussion: The case study for the Womens Studies programme at Massey University in New Zealand offers a comparative account of the differences between offering this programme at Massey, a bimodal institution, and at Athabasca University in Canada, a single mode institution. 4.5 Is there a best buy? Given the complexities of political context, needs, and resources, there is no consensus on a best buy among the structures as discussed. Some conclusions can be drawn, however, as follows. Open universities have a record of success that compels attention. Bimodal institutions appear to be most successful when they have established a well-supported open and distance learning unit; and they have their own educational staff who bring pedagogical expertise to developing open and distance learning.
2-12
Single purpose or single subject departments and institutions appear to have evolved into broader institutions or to have closed down, suggesting they are most appropriate for doing a specific job over a limited period of time. While many educators have expressed scepticism about co-operative structures, their potential for harnessing resources makes them of long-term significance nationally and internationally. 5. Practice exercise 5.1 Classifying open and distance learning providers Instructions: Provide each participant with a copy of the following classification chart for the structures of open and distance learning organisations. Ask each participant to identify as far as they can how their own organisation should be classified (allow about 20 minutes). Then have participants pair up and discuss their classifications with their partners (allow 20 minutes). In the subsequent whole-group discussion, draw out the difficulties they encountered while classifying their programmes, and discuss why these difficulties exist. Time required: Approximately one hour. Materials required: Enough copies of the classification chart to provide one copy per participant.
Do you want a freestanding institution, or a distance-education department within a college/university, or a co-operative structure?
Freestanding
A co-operative structure
several
one
one
several
national
international
Overview Source materials for this topic Issues in managing open and distance learning programmes Characteristics of open and distance learning Staffing The staffing mix Training staff Integrating media Managing project teams Variables of effective teamwork Systems thinking Collaborating with other agencies Centralising versus decentralising Planning and scheduling Costing and budgeting Monitoring and supporting staff at a distance Evaluating programme performance Measuring Comparing Correcting Practice exercise Management issues 1. Overview These materials support discussion on the topic of the operational issues that confront open and distance learning providers. The section opens with a list of the similarities between open and distance learning programmes and their more conventional counterparts. This list is only a beginning, and could be expanded during discussion with participants about features that are common to all education programmes, regardless of mode of development or delivery.
3-1
The remainder of the materials focus on ten operational issues that are of particular concern to managers of open and distance learning programmes. 1.1 Source materials for this topic Bates, T. Technology in open learning and distance education: a guide for decisionmakers. Vancouver: The Commonwealth of Learning and the Open Learning Agency, 1991. Moore, M., and G. Kearsley. Distance education: a systems view. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1996. Paul, R. Open learning and open management. London: Kogan Page, 1990. Snowden, B., and J. Daniel. The economics and management of small post-secondary distance education systems. Distance Education I: 1, [pp. 68-91] 1980. 2. Issues in managing open and distance learning programmes Managers of open and distance learning programmes face the same challenges as the managers of learning programmes delivered in more conventional, face-to-face settings: both aim to provide an education that is relevant and of high quality; both aim to offer and achieve certain minimum standards of education and training; both have administrative systems that enrol learners and register them on their chosen courses; and in the case of conventional programmes, both usually require learners to sit examinations before receiving certification. 3. Characteristics of open and distance learning However, open and distance learning programmes and conventional programmes have several differences. Specifically, open and distance learning programmes: often tend to be open programmes, concerned with improving access and with democratising education, as contrasted with maintaining education as a privilege of the elite; drop or lower the academic entrance requirements that conventional programmes typically require if they are also open programmes; have the same exit or graduation requirements as conventional programmes even though, because of their openness, they may accept learners with fewer formal qualifications, which creates a situation that places even greater demands on those providing tuition and learner support; tend to deliver their courses using a mix of technologies and media; they almost always include some print materials, but these are supported by a variety of electronic media, including radio, television, audio and video cassettes, computers, and telecommunications;
3-2
are typically supported by part-time tutors and counsellors who may be employed by conventional institutions; frequently require collaboration with other programmes and agencies to provide learning materials, course development and delivery personnel, facilities, or all of these; tend to need larger administrative bodies that accommodate a greater diversity of functions; and must remain open, flexible, and innovative in response to learner needs, a challenge that is best met by open, flexible, and innovative approaches to management. Discussion: You will likely want to add other similarities and differences to this list. You might also involve your participants in generating a list of the characteristics that are common to educational programmes in general, and then use that list as a basis for differentiating distance programmes from conventional programmes. These differences between open and distance learning and more conventional programmes raise a number of issues for managers of open and distance learning programmes: staffing for open and distance learning programmes; integrating media; managing project teams; analysing systems (systems thinking); collaborating with other agencies and organisations; centralising versus decentralising; planning and scheduling; costing and budgeting; monitoring and supervising staff at a distance; and evaluating programme performance. Discussion: This list is intended only as a prompt for discussion. You are welcome and urged to add other operational issues. 4. Staffing 4.1 The staffing mix The staffing mix required to implement an open and distance learning programme depends on the educational job to be done and the organisational model that has been chosen. To take an extreme example, compare the staffing needs of two completely different open and distance learning programmes.
An Overview of Open and Distance Learning 3-3
Example: A non-formal programme of literacy work with adult villagers, supported by radio and regular study circles, will require considerably different personnel than an executive MBA programme of formal study offered by a single mode, distance learning university. Nonetheless, personnel will likely fall into the following categories. Educational staff Educational staff include: subject specialists; specialists in the production of materials; specialists on tutoring and counselling; tutors, especially part-time tutors; broadcasting producers; and research workers and evaluators. Example: Both of the open and distance learning programmes in the example require educational staff set out in the following table. Staffing Needs of Two Different Open and Distance Learning Programmes Type of staff Subject specialist Literacy circle In the teaching of reading
MBA
programme
in management accounting in producing study guides in management accounting career advisors tutors communicating with learners via computer conferencing video producers for marketing the executive MBA programme and recruiting volunteers
Specialists in the production In producing effective of materials flannelgraph cut-outs and literacy primers Specialists in tutoring and counselling Tutors, especially part-time tutors Broadcasting producers trainers of study circle facilitators study circle facilitators
3-4
Materials production staff Materials production staff include: printers; copy editors; graphic designers; broadcasting technicians; typists and word processing clerks; and desktop publishing specialists. Administrative staff Administrative staff include: administrators and managers; personnel staff; financial staff; records clerks; secretaries and typists; warehousing and dispatch staff; and messengers, janitors, and drivers. 4.2 Training staff Arrangements will also be necessary for the training of staff, which may be done on the job; through short courses at the institution; by sending learners on full-time or part-time courses; or by enrolling them in an appropriate course taught at a distance. The choice of organisational model will influence the training strategy. Example: Within a bimodal institution, where a course writer is combining that role with teaching courses face-to-face, sensitivity is needed in arranging courses for experienced university course writers on how to write learning materials for use at a distance. Within a single mode institution, which contracts course writers from other, conventional institutions, the same kinds of sensitivity will be required in training, as well as even greater flexibility in timing the training sessions so that they fit in with the writers other commitments.
An Overview of Open and Distance Learning 3-5
Discussion: The intent here is to emphasise the similarities and differences in the configuration of teaching staff between conventional and distance programmes. Seek examples from both your own and your participants experience. 5. Integrating media Two quite different levels of decision-making are involved in selecting and using media and technologies in open learning and in open and distance learning: setting up a programme based on certain technologies; and making the most appropriate use of the media and technologies available. Ideally the decisions about how the programme should be set up will be driven by the second decision, which is based on the teaching resources available at the institution. This is an interactive process. For example, if television is available, a different kind of course can be produced than if it is not. When selecting media for your programme you can use the simple acronym, ACTIONS, to help you make your decision (Bates 1991). The ACTIONS Model for Media Choice in Open and Distance Learning
A C
Accessibility
Is the equipment your programme requires available to learners? Where will they be learning? At home? At their workplace? At a learning centre? Are the costs of production, delivery, and maintenance using this technology affordable? Are the costs appropriate to the number of learners who will be enrolled? Does the technology convey the level of facts, attitudes, and skills your programme requires? Is it suited to the kinds of learning required? Is the technology user friendly? Can it convey adequate and timely feedback to the learner? How open is your organisation to change and the introduction of new media? Is it important to your organisation to be leading edge? Is this a technology that learners will want to try? How fast can your programme implement this technology? How much training do staff and learners need in order to be able to use it? Will its use enable you to revise your learning materials as quickly as you need to?
Costs
T I O N S
Teaching ability
Speed
3-6
Discussion: Ask for an example of integrating media from your participants experience. 6. Managing project teams Much of the work of open and distance learning is carried out in teams. Example: The development and production of a course requires the collaboration of subject matter experts, instructional designers, editors, visual designers, and a variety of support people, including liaison librarians, printers, and so on. Likewise, the delivery of a course requires the collaboration of tutors, counsellors, librarians, registry personnel, and course materials warehousing and dispatch clerks, among others. Managing a team places different kinds of demands on managers than does line management: time, because you have specified start and finish dates; resources, because you need a high degree of financial accountability as projects are more difficult to cost and control than are routine line management functions; and personnel, because you tend to work with a cross-functional team of temporary members, some of whom will be in a reporting line to someone other than you. 6.1 Variables of effective teamwork Effective teamwork depends on a number of variables. Time A good deal of time is required to establish and re-establish the common ground that is essential to effective teamwork, which is achieved through shared experience, reflection, and discussion. Experience and maturity Experience in team-building among at least some of the team members is a great asset, as is a mature approach to the challenges of interpersonal communication. Knowledge Team members ideally should possess knowledge and expertise in a variety of fields that complement and reinforce each other rather than conflict, and that when taken together yield a much more complete and rounded picture than one field alone could produce. Skills Each team member needs to have skills he or she can put to direct use in making the team effective. Communication skills in particular include:
An Overview of Open and Distance Learning 3-7
explaining; describing; categorising; articulating; listening; checking out assumptions; attending to feelings; facilitating discussion; and demonstrating.
A sense of humour is also a valuable asset. Shared respect Each team member ideally should respect and admire the competence of the other members and the knowledge and skills of their respective fields or subfields. This respect extends to an eagerness to learn about the others fields and to use all contributions. Openness and flexibility Vital to teamwork, openness and flexibility have several facets: making and accepting offers; saying Yes, and more often than Yes, but or No; accepting and even welcoming differences and recognising that diversity is strength; demonstrating tolerance, raising biases to conscious levels, controlling them, and expressing tolerance out loud; sharing rather than trading ideas, experiences, and skills; building on each others learning and ideas to develop something new; and being willing to take risks, make errors, and learn from them as natural and useful parts of teamwork. Desire to learn, curiosity This variable stretches all the way from simple curiosity about how others might need to adapt our ideas in order to use them to viewing differences as exciting. Commitment to process All team members are concerned with efficiency and getting the job done and all get frustrated by the time taken up in meetings. Nonetheless, process is part of the task, and coming to grudging agreements rather than griping ones is vital.
3-8
Support and encouragement Teamwork is exciting and difficult, and support and encouragement are needed in good times and bad, and should be expressed out loud and often. Sensitivity Sensitivity emerges in two ways: putting others needs before ones own, at least some of the time, and paying attention to the emotional content of looks, words, and silences as well as to their intellectual substance. Trust Trust emerges as the keystone of teamwork. Without it teams fall apart. Risk is the flip side of trust, and must be accepted as part of the bargain. Attention to the use of power No matter how right or good our ideas are, telling others what to do is not the approach of a successful team, or between the team and others with whom the team interacts. Determination and energy Determination shines through in resistance to fatigue (headache, what headache?), in the insistence on recapturing focus when group discussion wanders too far off track, and in the continual juggling of tasks and time and other commitments in order to accommodate the needs of the group. Discussion: Ask participants for examples from their experience of teams that worked and of teams that did not work. 7. Systems thinking Implementing an open and distance learning programme requires thinking of the various tasks and sets of tasks involved in implementing components of a system. The way in which decisions are made and tasks are carried out in any one of the components has corresponding effects for all the other components in some way. First, let us look at the components of a typical open and distance learning system.
3-9
Various Tasks Involved in Implementing an Open and Distance Learning System Task Needs analysis Sub-tasks Design research method Carry out research Analyse results Draw conclusions for course Specifications Write course specifications, including aims and objectives technologies and media of presentation technologies and media of delivery Costs Allocate resources required for course Produce a budget Develop costs Staff Specify staff skills required Identify current staff available Recruit additional staff as required Brief and train staff as required Materials Search for existing materials Write or adapt materials Seek additional production staff as required Draw up appropriate contracts Edit materials Pilot materials Produce materials Assessment Identify types of assessment required Specify assessment methods Write assessment plan Write assessment items Support Specify support systems Write tutor guides Create record systems Brief tutors Agree systems with collaborating agencies
3-10
Task Marketing
Sub-tasks Identify market segments Produce sales and publicity materials Market the programmes Advise applicants Register learners Induct learners
Monitoring
Write monitoring plan Agree plan with staff and collaborating agencies Implement plan
Evaluation
Write evaluation plan Agree plan with stakeholders Implement evaluation Make revisions based on evaluation
This process is clearly not linear, for the following reasons: programme staff will be involved in several of these tasks at the same time; and the tasks are interdependent. Example: Decisions about the type of media to be used will depend partly on costs and partly on instructional appropriateness. Decisions about assessment will have to be made concurrently with materials design and development. Doing the revisions that fall out from the evaluation will involve reworking many or all of these tasks. 8. Collaborating with other agencies Collaboration among educational institutions, agencies, and programmes is becoming increasingly the order of the day, both in industrialised and less affluent countries, for a number of reasons, among them: public funding for education at all levels is decreasing, and governments are requiring institutions to work with each other and in many cases with industry in order to qualify for funding; and institutions and agencies are responding to decreasing levels of funding by seeking collaborative arrangements that can make scarce resources go further.
3-11
Open and distance learning programmes are far from the only ones affected by these pressures. Nonetheless, open and distance learning programmes are among the foremost seekers and implementers of collaborative arrangements, because of the nature of their work and for various other reasons: Learning materials development represents a major cost to distance programmes. Producers of such materials can share costs through co-development arrangements, or recoup costs by sales and leases of materials. Low-resource programmes can save on staffing and other recurrent costs by purchasing materials rather than developing their own. Learners are seeking flexibility, especially the ability to apply credits taken in one programme to the completion of requirements for another. Credit transfer arrangements place great demands on institutional collaborative arrangements. The technologies used in delivering distance programmes are forcing collaboration, partly because delivery agencies need to share costs, and partly because of the nature of the technologies themselves, which increasingly make distinctions between distance and conventional programmes irrelevant and meaningless. Examples: Collaborative arrangements in open and distance learning are many and varied. Here are only a few examples. A number of international organisations have been created to foster course sharing and other kinds of collaboration among their members, including The Commonwealth of Learning, CIFFAD (Consortium dinstitutions francophones de formation a distance), and the CREAD (Consorcio-red de educacion a distancia). The Open Learning Agency in British Columbia, Canada, collaborates in course sharing arrangements with a number of institutions, including Laurentian University and Athabasca University in Canada and the Open Learning Institute in Hong Kong. Some postgraduate degrees in open and distance learning have been the results of collaboration, for example between Deakin University and the University of South Australia, and between the University of London Institute of Education, the International Extension College, Deakin University, and the Open Learning Agency. The Contact North network in northern Ontario, Canada, makes delivery facilities available for a number of institutions to offer secondary and tertiary level programmes to widely scattered populations. For managers of open and distance learning programmes, this increasing collaboration means a need for the following kinds of skills and knowledge: a heightened awareness of and sensitivity to differences in institutional cultures;
3-12
skills in building effective trust relationships; and the ability to define, perceive, and monitor mutual benefits in collaborative arrangements. In many ways these are skills similar to the skills team members need. Thus managers of open and distance learning programmes need skills not only in managing teams but also in being part of them on a wider scale. Ross Paul in his book, Open Learning and Open Management (1990) gives the following advice to programme managers who are involved in collaborative projects: ensure that clear benefits from the collaboration are established and understood by all partners; ensure that clear and specific objectives and measures of achievement are stated; remain open to re-negotiation if necessary; keep the number of partners involved to the fewest possible to make the collaborative venture successful; delegate clear authority and responsibility to specific partners and individuals; take seriously the need to understand differences in corporate cultures; scrutinise the collaborative venture on a regular basis and disband if it is no longer meeting its objectives; and ensure that agreements have the full support of the executive officers of all the partner institutions. 9. Centralising versus decentralising In many open and distance learning programmes the delivery of learning materials and support to learners is provided through a series of regional learning centres. Regional networks of this kind afford a number advantages: they provide localised, personalised service to learners; they strengthen the local identity of the programme or institution; they can be an important marketing tool; they can reduce turnaround time in the return of feedback to learners on assignments; they can provide enhanced support to learners via laboratories, library resources, computing facilities, and audio and video conferencing; they provide sites for regular meetings and tutorials; and they provide the programme with direct feedback on its performance. Such networks also raise issues for managers: how much responsibility and which sets of tasks and functions should be delegated or decentralised to these regional centres?
3-13
Establishing a regional network Ross Paul recommends the following steps to managers in establishing a regional network: clearly define jurisdictions and responsibilities; make policy directives and reporting lines clear; give regional staff some leeway in decision making, so they can respond to local needs; understand the pressures for and advantages of face-to-face service; value criticisms and complaints from learners and from regional staff; develop appropriate skills in regional staff, including a recognition that they will have to perform a variety of tasks and fulfil a number of functions; and provide staff development and training for both regional and central staff, in equal measure. 10. Planning and scheduling To some extent the kinds of planning and scheduling that managers of open and distance learning programmes find themselves involved in are similar to those involved in systems thinking as discussed earlier. A preliminary planning and scheduling activity, however, particularly affects the launch of open and distance learning programmes. In this planning phase it is necessary to examine the broad goals the programme is to meet, the educational activities that flow from them, and organisational ways of meeting them, as well as finance, staffing, and the phasing of development. Goals and purpose: Research and stakeholder analysis is required to determine the educational needs that are to be met and the characteristics of potential learners. Educational activities: On the basis of a needs analysis, preliminary decisions can be made about the kind of courses to be offered; the teaching methods to be adopted; and the way learning materials are to be developed. Organisation: The organisational structure needs to take account of existing structures into which the programme will be fitted and the teaching methods the programme will use; the extent to which the new programme should be centralised; the development of any regional structure; and the way in which the programme will relate to other programmes and educational institutions. Operational systems will need to be designed for producing, storing, and distributing learning materials and for enrolling and supporting learners. Finance: Planners must determine the sources of funding and the balance between them; a detailed budget for the first two or three years and an outline budget for the first five; and the system that will be used for financial management and control. Staffing: Decisions about purpose and structure lead on to decisions about staffing, beginning with the job description and terms of service of the programme head.
3-14
Phasing: A key component is the timetable of activities to launch the new institution, setting out the stages from the completion of work of any planning group until learners are enrolled, and ideally extending to the point that the programme has reached a steady state. As a general rule it is most useful if this planning is carried out by a planning committee that consists of people who combine enough expert knowledge and prestige to enable the committee to both develop a workable plan and push it forward. 11. Costing and budgeting As a starting point in determining costs and budget for an open and distance learning programme, consider the following: the purpose of the programme; the anticipated numbers of learners to be enrolled; and the numbers of courses to be developed. These numbers will give some idea of the scale of resources needed. It is then helpful to distinguish between fixed costs, including capital and administrative staff costs; and variable costs, which will vary with the number of learners and courses. An open and distance learning programmes fixed costs are likely to be capital expenditures, including, where they do not already exist, buildings; furniture, fittings, and office equipment; computers and peripherals for management and course production; printing facilities; broadcasting studio, equipment, and transmitters; and vehicles. Recurrent expenditures will be primarily salaries. They will be determined by the extent to which the programme needs its own staff or can share or contract staff from other programmes; full-time field workers; and its own broadcasting or other media specialists. Some variable costs will vary with the number of courses, including salaries for consultants and outside writers; broadcasting production and transmission costs; and preparation costs for learning materials, including editing and graphic design.
An Overview of Open and Distance Learning 3-15
Other variable costs will vary with the number of learners, including cost of tutorial staff and associated costs for tutorials and marking; cost of travel; cost of producing learning materials such as costs of paper, audio and video cassettes, and so on; cost of distributing materials to learners; warehousing costs for storage of materials; and administrative costs for processing learner enrolments and servicing learners as they work through their courses. A question planners and managers of open and distance learning programmes inevitably are asked is, How do the costs of an open and distance learning programme compare with those of a conventional programme? The answer is not straightforward, for a number of reasons: We seldom have matched groups of learners studying at a distance and studying conventionally. For example, if distance programmes are also open programmes, learners may be less qualified upon entrance than those in conventional programmes. The structure of open and distance learning courses may differ from the structure of conventional programmes. For example, credit structures may differ. The media and teaching methods of open and distance learning programmes differ widely. Open and distance learning programmes may provide intangible social benefits such as increased access to education, and lowered opportunity costs for learners in terms of time taken up by study, but they may also involve social costs not included in a programme budget, such as the cost of radio transmissions provided by the national broadcasting system. Open and distance learning programmes tend to have high fixed costs and relatively low variable costs, which makes the cost per learner low when learner numbers are large. The cost per successful learner may be high, however, since open and distance learning programmes tend to have lower completion rates than conventional programmes. 12. Monitoring and supporting staff at a distance The management of open and distance learning programmes will almost always involve monitoring and supporting staff who are at a distance from central office. These staff may include regional centre staff, tutors, and learning materials producers such as writers of print materials and scripts for media production. It has become somewhat of a truism in open and distance learning that learners in open and distance learning programmes need continuing contact with the programme and support from programme personnel as they undertake and work through their studies.
3-16
Staff at a distance need the same kind of support and contact, especially since they are frequently working under conditions such as the following: they tend to be part-time, with major affiliation and commitment to some other institution; they tend to be on short-term or annual contracts; they likely have no regular face-to-face contact with supervisors and colleagues; and their roles are frequently diffuse and ill-defined. Too often the adage, Out of sight, out of mind, means not just isolation but invisibility for distant staff when it comes to decisions on policies and procedures, which tend to be made without due attention to their particular circumstances and needs. Because of the distance factor, it is even more important with distant staff to practise effective staff relations, by means of: clear role descriptions, expectations, and reporting lines; a thorough induction into the programme, its history, goals, policies, and procedures; frequent and effective two-way communication (e-mail is an excellent medium for this where available); opportunities for face-to-face meetings; frequent performance monitoring and review; accurate and efficient records systems; continual updating on changes in policies and procedures; and opportunities for input into decisions that affect their work. 13. Evaluating programme performance The three steps of evaluating can be labelled measuring; comparing; and correcting. Each presents special problems in an open and distance learning programme. 13.1 Measuring Measuring the learning activity of learners is complicated by distance. Even determining such apparently straightforward indicators as rates of learner progress or drop-out is surprisingly difficult to do on a continuous basis, especially in programmes that enrol learners throughout the year. Only in the vital areas of academic quality is measurement in a distance programme easier than in a conventional programme, for the team approach to course development
An Overview of Open and Distance Learning 3-17
and services delivery both encourages quality and ensures a wide awareness of any shortcomings. It is rather ironic that, although the team approach gives distance courses more quality and usually quantity than their conventional counterparts, the notion that distance study is substandard dies hard in traditional circles. 13.2 Comparing Comparing the performance of distance programmes with conventional programmes is also problematic. In the area of economic performance, standards borrowed from conventional education should be used with caution. Example: Capital-to-operating cost ratios tend to be considerably higher for conventional programmes than for distance programmes (except in cases in which a distance programme has had to make a major investment in technological infrastructure). In the area of learner performance, especially in terms of retention and graduation rates, comparing distance learners with conventional learners may be difficult given probable differences in entry qualifications and circumstances of study. Even comparing one distance programme with another is difficult, since different programmes tend to adopt different definitions of who counts as a learner. Example: Some programmes count as learners all those who have enrolled in a course, whereas others limit the use of the term to those who actually sit the exam, and discount the fact that only a small percentage of those initially registered have actually stayed with the course long enough to write the exam. 13.3 Correcting Because the standards of conventional programmes may often not be appropriate to open and distance learning programmes, the proper response to a gap between the measure and the standard may be to revise the standard rather than to initiate corrective action. If corrective action is required, however, the highly integrated and complex nature of an open and distance learning programme may make implementation somewhat problematic. In addition, although open and distance learning programmes tend and need to be flexible so that they can respond effectively to learners needs and circumstances, this flexibility should not be abused. Staff and learners do not appreciate being part of a continuing experiment in which all the variables are undergoing constant modification. Finally, the cost implications of corrective action may be more far-reaching in an integrated system of the kind that tends to characterise open and distance learning programmes.
3-18
Example: The introduction of a new technology for delivering the teaching component of the programme, even if it is confined to one course in the programme, will have consequences for all aspects of the programme, from recruiting and marketing to staffing and training to developing, producing, and dispatching materials. 14. Practice exercise 14.1 Management issues Instructions: Divide the group into a number of small working groups, five if possible. Assign to each group two of the operational issues discussed in this section: staffing; integrating media; managing teams; analysing systems (systems thinking); collaborating with other organisations and agencies; centralising versus decentralising; planning and scheduling; costing and budgeting; managing staff at a distance; and evaluating programme performance. Ask each group to discuss and document the following three things: examples of the ways in which these issues emerge in the programmes in which the group members are involved, even if those programmes do not at the moment involve any distance components; the ways in which their programmes are dealing with these issues; and the level of satisfaction with these responses, and the kinds of problems for which solutions are still being sought. Ask each group to present their findings to the larger group, for discussion. Timeframe: An hour to an hour and a half, depending on the size of your group. Materials: Flip chart paper or overhead transparencies and marker pens.
3-19
Overview Source materials for this topic Curriculum design Stakeholder analysis Identifying learning and training needs Deciding on a programme structure Course blueprinting Instructional design What is instructional design? Why use instructional design? What do instructional designers do? Tasks of the instructional designer Constructivist approaches to instructional design Should you use existing materials? Media choice Technologies used in open and distance learning A model for choosing media Media choice checklist Assessing learner performance Why assess? Who should assess? How can formative assessment help learners? When to assess How to assess External requirements Course production and delivery Terminology The course production process Managing production
4-1
Managing materials distribution Technological innovations Practice exercises How do you design instruction? Producing course material
1. Overview These materials support a discussion on the topic of planning and developing learning materials for distance delivery.
1.1 Source materials for this topic Bates, T. Technology in open learning and distance education: a guide for decisionmakers. Vancouver: The Commonwealth of Learning and the Open Learning Agency, 1991. Jackling, N. Weaving my own design. In M. Parer (ed.), Development, design, and distance education. Churchill, Australia: Centre for Distance Learning, Monash University, 1989. Lockwood, F. (ed.) Materials production in open and distance learning. London: Paul Chapman, 1994. Parer, M. (ed.) Development, design, and distance education. Churchill, Australia: Centre for Distance Learning, Monash University, 1989.Rowntree, D. Developing courses for students. London: Paul Chapman, 1985. Rowntree, D. Preparing materials for open, distance, and flexible learning: an action guide for teachers and trainers. London: Kogan Page, 1994. 2. Curriculum design In any educational or training setting, whether or not distance delivery is involved, a set of initial decisions need to be made when designing programmes and curricula. These include: conducting a stakeholder analysis; identifying learning and training needs; and deciding on programme content and structure. 2.1 Stakeholder analysis A curriculum or programme needs to ensure as far as possible that the range of topics covered, the structure of the courses, and their length, level, workload, teaching
4-2 An Overview of Open and Distance Learning
approach, and format are what is needed and wanted by the potential learners and other stakeholders. These stakeholders can include: the providing institution; the funding agency; employers; course developers; tutors and course support staff; existing learners or trainees; and potential learners. Discussion: You will want to add other stakeholders to this list in relation to the programmes offered in your own and your participants contexts. 2.2 Identifying learning and training needs The methods that are available for identifying learning and training needs include: organising a task group or working party that represents the spectrum of interests; Example: A small group of key people are typically charged with developing a plan. In the case of the development of a primary teacher upgrading programme, for example, the group is likely to involve Ministry of Education officials and district supervisors, teacher training colleges, teachers, and community representatives. consulting experts, clients, and target audiences; Example: This approach generates high quality and quantity of information, but those consulted may not be typical of the people whose views and opinions you seek. For example, an expert in teaching at the tertiary level may not be an appropriate expert to consult even though he is readily accessible. accurately measuring knowledge and skill shortage areas; Example: A researcher may be contracted to conduct a desk study of national trends, other training opportunities, and related developments, using documents that are available from government ministries, think tanks, research institutes, and libraries. monitoring and analysis of demand for existing courses;
4-3
Example: You may have data on trends in registration and learner profiles over time available in your own records. studying employers to identify current and anticipated training needs; and Example: Existing case studies may be available, or you can conduct your own focus group discussions or surveys, depending on the resources and time you have available. studying existing and potential learners to identify their current and anticipated needs. Example: Again, depending on the time and resources you have available you can collect case studies, or conduct focus group discussions or surveys. Discussion: How have your participants conducted stakeholder analyses in their own contexts? What examples can you provide from your own experience of curriculum development? 2.3 Deciding on a programme structure On-campus or at a distance? Distance-delivered courses mean that learners do the bulk of their learning through pre-prepared learning materials; and learners have little face-to-face contact with tutors or other learners. On-campus courses mean that learners (in theory) meet regularly with their teacher; and learners have the advantage (in principle) of being able to learn from each other. On-campus programmes are increasingly incorporating distance modes. Discussion: Remembering the earlier discussion of problems that open and distance learning programmes can solve, discuss whether face-to-face or distance modes are more appropriate for a particular curriculum. What will be taught? Useful distinctions can be made between: knowledge-oriented courses; methodological courses; and mixed courses that are
4-4 An Overview of Open and Distance Learning
issue-based or problem-based or interdisciplinary. Examples: A course on the history of open and distance learning is primarily knowledge-oriented, whereas a course on how to design effective instruction is primarily methodological. A course on instructional design may be mixed, however, combining learning theory with application. Such a course may also be problem-based (for example, where the outcome of the coursework is a design for an actual course), or interdisciplinary (drawing on principles from psychology, sociology, and anthropology for course design). Adopt or adapt existing course materials? Out of your needs assessment may emerge the existence of an established curriculum that you could adopt or adapt. Rather than give into the not-invented-here syndrome, ask the questions from the following checklist about this curriculum. Checklist for Choosing an Existing Curriculum